Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

 

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 

 

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013

or

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to             

Commission file number 001-09718

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

Pennsylvania   25-1435979

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

One PNC Plaza, 249 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222-2707

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(412) 762-2000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer   x    Accelerated filer   ¨
Non-accelerated filer   ¨    Smaller reporting company   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

As of July 31, 2013, there were 531,511,981 shares of the registrant’s common stock ($5 par value) outstanding.

 

 

 


Table of Contents

THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.

Cross-Reference Index to Second Quarter 2013 Form 10-Q

 

     Pages  

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

  

Item 1.      Financial Statements (Unaudited).

  

Consolidated Income Statement

     76   

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income

     77   

Consolidated Balance Sheet

     78   

Consolidated Statement Of Cash Flows

     79   

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

  

Note 1   Accounting Policies

     81   

Note 2   Acquisition and Divestiture Activity

     85   

Note 3   Loan Sale and Servicing Activities and Variable Interest Entities

     86   

Note 4   Loans and Commitments to Extend Credit

     92   

Note 5   Asset Quality

     92   

Note 6   Purchased Loans

     108   

Note 7    Allowances for Loan and Lease Losses and Unfunded Loan Commitments and Letters of Credit

     109   

Note 8   Investment Securities

     112   

Note 9   Fair Value

     118   

Note 10 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

     130   

Note 11 Capital Securities of Subsidiary Trusts and Perpetual Trust Securities

     133   

Note 12 Certain Employee Benefit And Stock Based Compensation Plans

     134   

Note 13 Financial Derivatives

     136   

Note 14 Earnings Per Share

     145   

Note 15 Total Equity And Other Comprehensive Income

     146   

Note 16 Income Taxes

     151   

Note 17 Legal Proceedings

     151   

Note 18 Commitments and Guarantees

     154   

Note 19 Segment Reporting

     158   

Note 20 Subsequent Events

     161   

Statistical Information (Unaudited)

  

Average Consolidated Balance Sheet And Net Interest Analysis

     162   

Item 2.       Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

  

Financial Review

  

Consolidated Financial Highlights

     1   

Executive Summary

     3   

Consolidated Income Statement Review

     11   

Consolidated Balance Sheet Review

     14   

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements And Variable Interest Entities

     27   

Fair Value Measurements

     27   

European Exposure

     28   

Business Segments Review

     30   

Critical Accounting Estimates And Judgments

     42   

Status Of Qualified Defined Benefit Pension Plan

     44   

Recourse And Repurchase Obligations

     44   

Risk Management

     48   

Internal Controls And Disclosure Controls And Procedures

     69   

Glossary Of Terms

     70   

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information

     74   

Item 3.       Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

     48-69, 118-130 and  136-144   

Item 4.      Controls and Procedures.

     69   

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

  

Item 1.      Legal Proceedings.

     164   

Item 1A.  RiskFactors.

     164   

Item 2.       Unregistered Sales Of Equity Securities And Use Of Proceeds.

     164   

Item 6.      Exhibits.

     165   

Exhibit Index.

     165   

Signature   

     165   

Corporate Information

     166   


Table of Contents

THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.

Cross-Reference Index to Second Quarter 2013 Form 10-Q (continued)

 

MD&A TABLE REFERENCE

 

Table

  

Description

  Page  

1

  

Consolidated Financial Highlights

    1   

2

  

Summarized Average Balance Sheet

    8   

3

  

Results Of Businesses – Summary

    9   

4

  

Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin

    11   

5

  

Noninterest Income

    12   

6

  

Summarized Balance Sheet Data

    14   

7

  

Details Of Loans

    14   

8

  

Accretion – Purchased Impaired Loans

    15   

9

  

Purchased Impaired Loans – Accretable Yield

    15   

10

  

Valuation of Purchased Impaired Loans

    16   

11

  

Weighted Average Life of the Purchased Impaired Portfolios

    16   

12

  

Accretable Difference Sensitivity – Total Purchased Impaired Loans

    17   

13

  

Net Unfunded Credit Commitments

    17   

14

  

Investment Securities

    18   

15

  

Vintage, Current Credit Rating and FICO Score for Asset-Backed Securities

    19   

16

  

Other-Than-Temporary Impairments

    20   

17

  

Net Unrealized Gains and Losses on Non-Agency Securities

    21   

18

  

Loans Held For Sale

    22   

19

  

Details Of Funding Sources

    23   

20

  

Shareholders’ Equity

    24   

21

  

Basel I Risk-Based Capital

    25   

22

  

Estimated Pro forma Basel III Tier 1 Common Capital Ratio

    26   

23

  

Fair Value Measurements – Summary

    27   

24

  

Summary of European Exposure

    28   

25

  

Retail Banking Table

    31   

26

  

Corporate & Institutional Banking Table

    33   

27

  

Asset Management Group Table

    36   

28

  

Residential Mortgage Banking Table

    38   

29

  

BlackRock Table

    40   

30

  

Non-Strategic Assets Portfolio Table

    40   

31

  

Pension Expense – Sensitivity Analysis

    44   

32

  

Analysis of Quarterly Residential Mortgage Repurchase Claims by Vintage

    45   

33

  

Analysis of Quarterly Residential Mortgage Unresolved Asserted Indemnification and Repurchase Claims

    46   

34

  

Analysis of Residential Mortgage Indemnification and Repurchase Claim Settlement Activity

    46   

35

  

Analysis of Home Equity Unresolved Asserted Indemnification and Repurchase Claims

    47   

36

  

Analysis of Home Equity Indemnification and Repurchase Claim Settlement Activity

    47   

37

  

Nonperforming Assets By Type

    50   

38

  

OREO and Foreclosed Assets

    51   

39

  

Change in Nonperforming Assets

    51   

40

  

Accruing Loans Past Due 30 To 59 Days

    52   

41

  

Accruing Loans Past Due 60 To 89 Days

    52   

42

  

Accruing Loans Past Due 90 Days Or More

    53   

43

  

Home Equity Lines of Credit – Draw Period End Dates

    54   

44

  

Consumer Real Estate Related Loan Modifications

    55   

45

  

Consumer Real Estate Related Loan Modifications Re-Default by Vintage

    56   

46

  

Summary of Troubled Debt Restructurings

    57   

47

  

Loan Charge-Offs And Recoveries

    58   

48

  

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

    59   

49

  

Credit Ratings as of June 30, 2013 for PNC and PNC Bank, N.A.

    63   

50

  

Contractual Obligations

    64   

51

  

Other Commitments

    64   

52

  

Interest Sensitivity Analysis

    65   

53

  

Net Interest Income Sensitivity to Alternative Rate Scenarios (Second Quarter 2013)

    65   

54

  

Alternate Interest Rate Scenarios: One Year Forward

    66   

55

  

Enterprise-Wide Trading-Related Gains/Losses Versus Value-at-Risk

    66   

56

  

Trading Revenue

    67   

57

  

Equity Investments Summary

    67   

58

  

Financial Derivatives Summary

    69   


Table of Contents

THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.

Cross-Reference Index to Second Quarter 2013 Form 10-Q (continued)

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS TABLE REFERENCE

 

Table

  

Description

   Page  

59

  

Certain Financial Information and Cash Flows Associated with Loan Sale and Servicing Activities

     87   

60

  

Consolidated VIEs – Carrying Value

     88   

61

  

Assets and Liabilities of Consolidated VIEs

     89   

62

  

Non-Consolidated VIEs

     89   

63

  

Loans Outstanding

     92   

64

  

Net Unfunded Credit Commitments

     92   

65

  

Age Analysis of Past Due Accruing Loans

     93   

66

  

Nonperforming Assets

     94   

67

  

Commercial Lending Asset Quality Indicators

     96   

68

  

Home Equity and Residential Real Estate Balances

     97   

69

   Home Equity and Residential Real Estate Asset Quality Indicators – Excluding Purchased Impaired Loans      97   

70

  

Home Equity and Residential Real Estate Asset Quality Indicators – Purchased Impaired Loans

     99   

71

  

Credit Card and Other Consumer Loan Classes Asset Quality Indicators

     101   

72

  

Summary of Troubled Debt Restructurings

     102   

73

  

Financial Impact and TDRs by Concession Type

     103   

74

  

TDRs which have Subsequently Defaulted

     105   

75

  

Impaired Loans

     107   

76

  

Purchased Impaired Loans – Balances

     108   

77

  

Purchased Impaired Loans – Accretable Yield

     108   

78

  

Rollforward of Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses and Associated Loan Data

     110   

79

  

Rollforward of Allowance for Unfunded Loan Commitments and Letters of Credit

     111   

80

  

Investment Securities Summary

     112   

81

  

Gross Unrealized Loss and Fair Value of Securities Available for Sale

     113   

82

   Credit Impairment Assessment Assumptions – Non-Agency Residential Mortgage-Backed and Asset-Backed Securities      114   

83

  

Other-Than-Temporary Impairments

     115   

84

  

Rollforward of Cumulative OTTI Credit Losses Recognized in Earnings

     115   

85

  

Gains (Losses) on Sales of Securities Available for Sale

     116   

86

  

Contractual Maturity of Debt Securities

     116   

87

  

Weighted-Average Expected Maturity of Mortgage and Other Asset-Backed Debt Securities

     117   

88

  

Fair Value of Securities Pledged and Accepted as Collateral

     117   

89

  

Fair Value Measurements – Summary

     119   

90

  

Reconciliation of Level 3 Assets and Liabilities

     120   

91

  

Fair Value Measurement – Recurring Quantitative Information

     124   

92

  

Fair Value Measurements – Nonrecurring

     126   

93

  

Fair Value Measurements – Nonrecurring Quantitative Information

     126   

94

  

Fair Value Option – Changes in Fair Value

     127   

95

  

Fair Value Option – Fair Value and Principal Balances

     128   

96

  

Additional Fair Value Information Related to Financial Instruments

     129   

97

  

Changes in Goodwill by Business Segment

     130   

98

  

Other Intangible Assets

     130   

99

  

Amortization Expense on Existing Intangible Assets

     131   

100

  

Summary of Changes in Customer-Related Other Intangible Assets

     131   

101

  

Commercial Mortgage Servicing Rights

     131   

102

  

Residential Mortgage Servicing Rights

     131   

103

  

Commercial Mortgage Loan Servicing Rights – Key Valuation Assumptions

     132   

104

  

Residential Mortgage Loan Servicing Rights – Key Valuation Assumptions

     132   

105

  

Fees from Mortgage and Other Loan Servicing

     132   

106

  

Net Periodic Pension and Postretirement Benefits Costs

     134   

107

  

Option Pricing Assumptions

     135   

108

  

Stock Option Rollforward

     135   


Table of Contents

THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.

Cross-Reference Index to Second Quarter 2013 Form 10-Q (continued)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS TABLE REFERENCE (continued)

 

Table

  

Description

   Page  

109

   Nonvested Incentive/Performance Unit Share Awards and Restricted Stock/Share Unit Awards – Rollforward      136   

110

  

Nonvested Cash-Payable Restricted Share Units – Rollforward

     136   

111

  

Derivatives Total Notional or Contractual Amounts and Fair Values

     139   

112

  

Derivative Assets and Liabilities Offsetting

     140   

113

  

Derivatives Designated in GAAP Hedge Relationships – Fair Value Hedges

     142   

114

  

Derivatives Designated in GAAP Hedge Relationships – Cash Flow Hedges

     142   

115

  

Derivatives Designated in GAAP Hedge Relationships – Net Investment Hedges

     143   

116

  

Gains (Losses) on Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments under GAAP

     143   

117

  

Credit Default Swaps

     144   

118

  

Credit Ratings of Credit Default Swaps

     144   

119

  

Referenced/Underlying Assets of Credit Default Swaps

     144   

120

  

Risk Participation Agreements Sold

     144   

121

  

Internal Credit Ratings of Risk Participation Agreements Sold

     144   

122

  

Basic and Diluted Earnings per Common Share

     145   

123

  

Rollforward of Total Equity

     146   

124

  

Other Comprehensive Income

     147   

125

  

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Components

     150   

126

  

Net Operating Loss Carryforwards and Tax Credit Carryforwards

     151   

127

  

Net Outstanding Standby Letters of Credit

     154   

128

  

Analysis of Commercial Mortgage Recourse Obligations

     155   

129

  

Analysis of Indemnification and Repurchase Liability for Asserted Claims and Unasserted Claims

     156   

130

  

Reinsurance Agreements Exposure

     157   

131

  

Reinsurance Reserves – Rollforward

     157   

132

  

Resale and Repurchase Agreements Offsetting

     158   

133

  

Results Of Businesses

     160   


Table of Contents

FINANCIAL REVIEW

THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.

TABLE 1: CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

 

Dollars in millions, except per share data

Unaudited

   Three months ended
June 30
     Six months ended
June 30
 
   2013     2012      2013      2012  

Financial Results (a)

            

Revenue

            

Net interest income

   $ 2,258      $ 2,526       $ 4,647       $ 4,817   

Noninterest income

     1,806        1,097         3,372         2,538   

Total revenue

     4,064        3,623         8,019         7,355   

Noninterest expense

     2,435        2,648         4,830         5,103   

Pretax, pre-provision earnings (b)

     1,629        975         3,189         2,252   

Provision for credit losses

     157        256         393         441   

Income before income taxes and noncontrolling interests

   $ 1,472      $ 719       $ 2,796       $ 1,811   

Net income

   $ 1,123      $ 546       $ 2,127       $ 1,357   

Less:

            

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

     1        (5      (8      1   

Preferred stock dividends and discount accretion

     53        25         128         64   

Net income attributable to common shareholders

   $ 1,069      $ 526       $ 2,007       $ 1,292   

Diluted earnings per common share

   $ 1.99      $ .98       $ 3.76       $ 2.42   

Cash dividends declared per common share

   $ .44      $ .40       $ .84       $ .75   

Performance Ratios

            

Net interest margin (c)

     3.58     4.08      3.69      3.99

Noninterest income to total revenue

     44        30         42         35   

Efficiency

     60        73         60         69   

Return on:

            

Average common shareholders’ equity

     11.81        6.23         11.25         7.80   

Average assets

     1.49        .74         1.42         .94   

See page 70 for a glossary of certain terms used in this Report.

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current period presentation, which we believe is more meaningful to readers of our consolidated financial statements.

(a) The Executive Summary and Consolidated Income Statement Review portions of the Financial Review section of this Report provide information regarding items impacting the comparability of the periods presented.
(b) We believe that pretax, pre-provision earnings, a non-GAAP measure, is useful as a tool to help evaluate the ability to provide for credit costs through operations.
(c) Calculated as annualized taxable-equivalent net interest income divided by average earning assets. The interest income earned on certain earning assets is completely or partially exempt from federal income tax. As such, these tax-exempt instruments typically yield lower returns than taxable investments. To provide more meaningful comparisons of net interest margins for all earning assets, we use net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis in calculating net interest margin by increasing the interest income earned on tax-exempt assets to make it fully equivalent to interest income earned on taxable investments. This adjustment is not permitted under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the Consolidated Income Statement. The taxable-equivalent adjustments to net interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012 were $40 million and $35 million, respectively. The taxable-equivalent adjustments to net interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012 were $80 million and $66 million, respectively.

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    1


Table of Contents

TABLE 1: CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (CONTINUED) (a)

 

Unaudited    June 30
2013
    December 31
2012
    June 30
2012
 

Balance Sheet Data (dollars in millions, except per share data)

        

Assets

   $ 304,415      $ 305,107      $ 299,575   

Loans (b) (c)

     189,775        185,856        180,425   

Allowance for loan and lease losses (b)

     3,772        4,036        4,156   

Interest-earning deposits with banks (b)

     3,797        3,984        3,995   

Investment securities (b)

     57,449        61,406        61,937   

Loans held for sale (c)

     3,814        3,693        3,333   

Goodwill and other intangible assets

     11,228        10,869        10,962   

Equity investments (b) (d)

     10,054        10,877        10,617   

Other assets (b) (c)

     24,297        23,679        24,559   
 

Noninterest-bearing deposits

     66,708        69,980        64,476   

Interest-bearing deposits

     145,571        143,162        142,447   

Total deposits

     212,279        213,142        206,923   

Transaction deposits

     175,564        176,705        166,043   

Borrowed funds (b) (c)

     39,864        40,907        43,689   

Shareholders’ equity

     40,286        39,003        37,005   

Common shareholders’ equity

     36,347        35,413        33,884   

Accumulated other comprehensive income

     45        834        402   
 

Book value per common share

   $ 68.46      $ 67.05      $ 64.00   

Common shares outstanding (millions)

     531        528        529   

Loans to deposits

     89     87     87
 

Client Assets (billions)

        

Discretionary assets under management

   $ 117      $ 112      $ 109   

Nondiscretionary assets under administration

     116        112        105   

Total assets under administration

     233        224        214   

Brokerage account assets

     39        38        36   

Total client assets

   $ 272      $ 262      $ 250   
 

Capital Ratios

        

Basel I capital ratios

        

Tier 1 common

     10.1     9.6     9.3

Tier 1 risk-based (e)

     12.0        11.6        11.4   

Total risk-based (e)

     15.2        14.7        14.2   

Leverage (e)

     10.9        10.4        10.1   

Common shareholders’ equity to assets

     11.9        11.6        11.3   

Pro forma Basel III Tier 1 common (f) 

     8.2     7.5     N/A (g) 
 

Asset Quality

        

Nonperforming loans to total loans

     1.75     1.75     1.92

Nonperforming assets to total loans, OREO and foreclosed assets

     1.99        2.04        2.31   

Nonperforming assets to total assets

     1.24        1.24        1.39   

Net charge-offs to average loans (for the three months ended) (annualized) (h)

     .44        .67        .71   

Allowance for loan and lease losses to total loans

     1.99        2.17        2.30   

Allowance for loan and lease losses to nonperforming loans (i)

     114     124     120

Accruing loans past due 90 days or more

   $ 1,762      $ 2,351      $ 2,483   
(a) The Executive Summary and Consolidated Balance Sheet Review portions of the Financial Review section of this Report provide information regarding items impacting the comparability of the periods presented.
(b) Amounts include consolidated variable interest entities. See Consolidated Balance Sheet in Part I, Item 1 of this Report for additional information.
(c) Amounts include assets and liabilities for which we have elected the fair value option. See Consolidated Balance Sheet in Part I, Item 1 of this Report for additional information.
(d) Amounts include our equity interest in BlackRock.
(e) The minimum U.S. regulatory capital ratios under Basel I are 4.0% for Tier 1 risk-based, 8.0% for Total risk-based, and 4.0% for Leverage. The comparable well-capitalized levels are 6.0% for Tier 1 risk-based, 10.0% for Total risk-based, and 5.0% for Leverage.
(f) PNC’s pro forma Basel III Tier 1 common capital ratio was estimated without the benefit of phase-ins and is based on our understanding of the prior Basel III rule proposals issued by the U.S. banking agencies in June 2012. See Table 21: Basel I Risk-Based Capital and Table 22: Estimated Pro forma Basel III Tier 1 Common Capital Ratio and related information for further detail on how this pro forma ratio differs from the Basel I Tier 1 common capital ratio. The Basel III ratio will replace the current Basel I ratio for this regulatory metric when PNC exits the parallel run qualification phase.
(g) Pro forma Basel III Tier 1 common capital ratio not disclosed in our second quarter 2012 Form 10-Q.
(h) Pursuant to alignment with interagency guidance on practices for loans and lines of credit related to consumer lending in the first quarter of 2013, additional charge-offs of $134 million were taken.
(i) The allowance for loan and lease losses includes impairment reserves attributable to purchased impaired loans. Nonperforming loans exclude certain government insured or guaranteed loans, loans held for sale, loans accounted for under the fair value option and purchased impaired loans.

 

2    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

This Financial Review, including the Consolidated Financial Highlights, should be read together with our unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements and unaudited Statistical Information included elsewhere in this Report and with Items 6, 7, 8 and 9A of our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K (2012 Form 10-K). We have reclassified certain prior period amounts to conform with the current period presentation, which we believe is more meaningful to readers of our consolidated financial statements. For information regarding certain business, regulatory and legal risks, see the following sections as they appear in this Report and in our 2012 Form 10-K and our First Quarter 2013 Form 10-Q: the Risk Management And Recourse and Repurchase Obligation sections of the Financial Review portion of the respective report; Item 1A Risk Factors included in our 2012 Form 10-K; and the Legal Proceedings and Commitments and Guarantees Notes of the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements included in the respective report. Also, see the Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information section in this Financial Review and the Critical Accounting Estimates And Judgments section in this Financial Review and in our 2012 Form 10-K for certain other factors that could cause actual results or future events to differ, perhaps materially, from historical performance and from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements included in this Report. See Note 19 Segment Reporting in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Report for a reconciliation of total business segment earnings to total PNC consolidated net income as reported on a GAAP basis.

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

PNC is one of the largest diversified financial services companies in the United States and is headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

PNC has businesses engaged in retail banking, corporate and institutional banking, asset management and residential mortgage banking, providing many of its products and services nationally, as well as other products and services in PNC’s primary geographic markets located in Pennsylvania, Ohio, New Jersey, Michigan, Illinois, Maryland, Indiana, North Carolina, Florida, Kentucky, Washington, D.C., Delaware, Alabama, Virginia, Georgia, Missouri, Wisconsin and South Carolina. PNC also provides certain products and services internationally.

KEY STRATEGIC GOALS

At PNC we manage our company for the long term. We are focused on the fundamentals of growing customers, loans, deposits and fee revenue and improving profitability, while investing for the future and managing risk and capital. We continue to invest in our products, markets and brand, and embrace our corporate responsibility to the communities where we do business.

We strive to expand and deepen customer relationships by offering convenient banking options and innovative technology solutions, providing a broad range of fee-based and credit products and services, focusing on customer service and enhancing our brand. Our approach is focused on organically growing and deepening client relationships that meet our risk/return measures. Our strategies for growing fee income across our lines of business are focused on achieving deeper market penetration and cross selling our diverse product mix. A key priority is to drive growth in newly acquired and underpenetrated markets, including in the Southeast. We may also grow revenue through appropriate and targeted acquisitions and, in certain businesses, by expanding into new geographical markets.

Our capital priorities for 2013 are to support client growth and business investment, maintain appropriate capital in light of economic uncertainty and the Basel III framework and return excess capital to shareholders through dividends, in accordance with our capital plan included in our 2013 Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) submission to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Federal Reserve). We continue to improve our capital levels and ratios through retention of quarterly earnings and expect to build capital through retention of future earnings. During 2013, PNC does not expect to repurchase common stock through a share buyback program. PNC continues to maintain a strong bank and bank holding company liquidity position. For more detail, see the 2013 Capital and Liquidity Actions portion of this Executive Summary, the Funding and Capital Sources portion of the Consolidated Balance Sheet Review section and the Liquidity Risk Management section of this Financial Review and the Supervision and Regulation section in Item 1 Business of our 2012 Form 10-K.

PNC faces a variety of risks that may impact various aspects of our risk profile from time to time. The extent of such impacts may vary depending on factors such as the current economic, political and regulatory environment, merger and acquisition activity and operational challenges. Many of these risks and our risk management strategies are described in more detail in our 2012 Form 10-K and elsewhere in this Report.

2013 CAPITAL AND LIQUIDITY ACTIONS

Our ability to take certain capital actions, including plans to pay or increase common stock dividends or to repurchase shares under current or future programs, is subject to the results of the supervisory assessment of capital adequacy undertaken by the Federal Reserve and our primary bank regulators as part of the CCAR process. This capital adequacy assessment is based on a review of a comprehensive capital plan submitted to the Federal Reserve.

In connection with the 2013 CCAR, PNC submitted its capital plan, approved by its board of directors, to the Federal Reserve and our primary bank regulators in January 2013. As

 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    3


Table of Contents

we announced on March 14, 2013, the Federal Reserve accepted the capital plan and did not object to our proposed capital actions, which included a recommendation to increase the quarterly common stock dividend in the second quarter of 2013. A share repurchase program for 2013 was not included in the capital plan primarily as a result of PNC’s 2012 acquisition of RBC Bank (USA) and expansion into Southeastern markets. For additional information concerning the CCAR process and the factors the Federal Reserve takes into consideration in evaluating capital plans, see Item 1 Business – Supervision and Regulation included in our 2012 Form 10-K.

See the Liquidity Risk Management portion of the Risk Management section of this Financial Review, as well as Note 20 Subsequent Events in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in this Report, for more detail on our 2013 capital and liquidity actions.

On April 4, 2013, consistent with our capital plan submitted to the Federal Reserve in 2013, our board of directors approved an increase to PNC’s quarterly common stock dividend from 40 cents per common share to 44 cents per common share with a payment date of May 5, 2013, payable the next business day, to shareholders of record at the close of business on April 16, 2013. On July 3, 2013, our board of directors declared a quarterly common stock cash dividend of 44 cents per share with a payment date of August 5, 2013 to shareholders of record at the close of business on July 15, 2013.

RECENT MARKET AND INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENTS

There have been numerous legislative and regulatory developments and dramatic changes in the competitive landscape of our industry over the last several years. The United States and other governments have undertaken major reform of the regulation of the financial services industry, including engaging in new efforts to impose requirements designed to strengthen the stability of the financial system and protect consumers and investors. We expect to face further increased regulation of our industry as a result of current and future initiatives intended to provide economic stimulus, financial market stability and enhanced regulation of financial services companies and to enhance the liquidity and solvency of financial institutions and markets. We also expect in many cases more intense scrutiny from our supervisors in the examination process and more aggressive enforcement of regulations on both the federal and state levels. Compliance with new regulations will increase our costs and reduce our revenue. Some new regulations may limit our ability to pursue certain desirable business opportunities.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank), enacted in July 2010, mandates the most wide-ranging overhaul of financial industry regulation in decades. Many parts of the law are now in effect,

and others are now in the implementation stage, which is likely to continue for several years.

New and evolving capital and liquidity standards will have a significant effect on banks and bank holding companies, including PNC. In July 2013, the U.S. banking agencies issued final rules to implement the Basel III capital framework in the United States. In addition, the banking agencies issued final rules to revise the framework for the risk-weighting of assets under Basel I and Basel II (referred to as the standardized approach and the advanced approaches, respectively). For banking organizations subject to Basel II (such as PNC), the Basel III final rules become effective on January 1, 2014, although many provisions are phased-in over a period of years, with the rules generally fully phased-in as of January 1, 2019. The changes made to the Basel I risk-weighting framework by the standardized approach rules become effective on January 1, 2015, and the changes made to the Basel II risk-weighting framework by the advanced approaches rules become effective on January 1, 2014.

The Basel III final rules, among other things, narrow the definition of regulatory capital, require banking organizations with $15 billion or more in assets to phase-out trust preferred securities from Tier 1 regulatory capital, establish a new Tier 1 common capital requirement for banking organizations and revise the capital levels at which a bank would be subject to prompt corrective action. As of June 30, 2013, PNC had $216 million of trust preferred securities included in Tier 1 capital which, under these rules and Dodd-Frank, will no longer qualify as Tier 1 capital over time to the extent they remain outstanding. The final rules also would require that significant common stock investments in unconsolidated financial institutions (as defined in the final rules), as well as mortgage servicing rights and deferred tax assets, be deducted from regulatory capital to the extent such items individually exceed 10%, or in the aggregate exceed 15%, of the organization’s adjusted Tier 1 common capital. The Basel III final rules also significantly limit the extent to which minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries (including minority interests in the form of REIT preferred securities) may be included in regulatory capital. As of June 30, 2013, PNC had approximately $1 billion of REIT preferred securities outstanding that will be subject to these limitations over time to the extent they remain outstanding. In addition, for Basel II banking organizations, like PNC, the final rules remove the filter that currently excludes unrealized gains and losses (other than those resulting from other-than-temporary impairments) on available for sale debt securities from affecting regulatory capital, which could increase the volatility of regulatory capital of Basel II banking organizations in response to changes in interest rates.

When fully phased-in on January 1, 2019, the Basel III rules require that banking organizations maintain a minimum Tier 1 common ratio of 4.5%, a Tier 1 capital ratio of 6.0%, a total capital ratio of 8.0% and a leverage ratio of 4.0%. Moreover,

 

 

4    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

the final rules, when fully phased-in, will also require banking organizations to maintain a Tier 1 common ratio of at least 7.0%, a Tier 1 capital ratio of at least 8.5%, and a total capital ratio of at least 10.5% to avoid limitations on capital distributions (including common stock dividends and share repurchases) and certain discretionary incentive compensation payments. For Basel II banking organizations (such as PNC), these higher buffer levels above the regulatory minimums could be supplemented by a countercyclical capital buffer of up to an additional 2.5% during periods of excessive credit growth, although this buffer is initially set at zero in the United States. After a Basel II banking organization exits its “parallel run” qualification phase under the Basel II framework, its compliance with these minimum and buffer ratio levels will be determined using the lower of the organization’s capital ratios calculated under the standardized or the advanced approach. For additional information concerning PNC’s estimated fully phased-in pro forma Basel III Tier 1 common ratio as well as the Basel II “parallel run” process, please see Balance Sheet Highlights in this Executive Summary section, and Capital and Table 22: Estimated Pro Forma Basel III Tier 1 Common Capital in the Consolidated Balance Sheet Review section, of this Report.

Basel II banking organizations also are subject to a new minimum 3% supplementary leverage ratio that becomes effective on January 1, 2018, with public reporting of the ratio beginning in 2015. Unlike the existing leverage ratio, the denominator of the supplementary leverage ratio takes into account certain off-balance sheet items, including loan commitments and potential future exposure under derivative contracts. We estimate that our supplementary leverage ratio currently exceeds the new minimum ratio requirement applicable to PNC that goes into effect in 2018. In July 2013, the U.S. banking agencies separately requested comment on a proposed rule that would raise the supplemental leverage ratio for U.S. bank holding companies that have $700 billion or more in total consolidated assets or $10 trillion or more in assets under custody and for the insured depository institution subsidiaries of these bank holding companies. Based on the asset and custody thresholds included in the proposed rule, PNC and PNC Bank, National Association would not be subject to this higher proposed supplemental leverage ratio.

As noted above, the final rules adopted by the U.S. banking agencies in July 2013 revise both the Basel I and Basel II risk-weighting framework. Both the standardized approach rules (which will replace the Basel I risk-weighting framework as of January 1, 2015) and the advanced approaches modifications to the Basel II risk-weighting framework replace the use of credit ratings with alternative methodologies for assessing creditworthiness and establish a new framework (referred to as the Simplified Supervisory Framework Approach) for risk-weighting securitization exposures (such as privately issued mortgage-backed securities and asset-backed securities). The standardized approach also would, among other things, increase the risk weight applicable to high volatility commercial real estate exposures and past due exposures,

establish a new framework for cleared derivatives and securities financing transactions, and require that equity exposures (other than those that are deducted from capital) be risk-weighted in a manner similar to the existing Basel II rules for equity exposures. In addition, Basel II banks that have not exited the parallel run qualification phase by the first quarter of 2015 are required to make certain public disclosures after that date under the standardized approach until the bank exits parallel run (after which it would make the public disclosures required by the advanced approaches rule). The advanced approaches rule would, among other things, significantly alter the methodology for determining counterparty credit risk weights, including the establishment of a credit valuation adjustment for counterparty risk in over-the-counter (OTC) derivative transactions, under Basel II.

The need to maintain more and higher quality capital could limit PNC’s business activities, including lending, and its ability to expand, either organically or through acquisitions. It could also result in PNC taking steps to increase its capital that may be dilutive to shareholders or being limited in its ability to pay dividends or otherwise return capital to shareholders, or selling or refraining from acquiring assets, the capital requirements for which are inconsistent with the assets’ underlying risks. Moreover, although these new requirements are being phased in over time, U.S. federal banking agencies have been taking into account expectations regarding the ability of banks to meet these new requirements, including under stressed conditions, in approving actions that represent uses of capital, such as dividend increases, share repurchases and acquisitions.

On July 31, 2013, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia granted summary judgment to the plaintiffs in NACS, et al. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The decision vacated the debit card interchange and network processing rules that went into effect in October 2011 and that were adopted by the Federal Reserve to implement provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. The court found among other things that the debit card interchange fees permitted under the rules allowed card issuers to recover costs that were not permitted by the statute. The court has temporarily stayed its decision. We do not now know the ultimate impact of this ruling, nor the timing of any such impact, but if the ruling were to take effect it could have a materially adverse impact on our debit card interchange revenues. Debit card interchange revenue for the year ended December 31, 2012 was approximately $305 million.

For additional information concerning recent legislative and regulatory developments, as well as certain governmental, legislative and regulatory inquiries and investigations that may affect PNC, please see Item 1 Business – Supervision and Regulation, Item 1A Risk Factors and Note 23 Legal Proceedings in Item 8 of our 2012 Form 10-K and Note 17 Legal Proceedings and Note 18 Commitments and Guarantees in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Report.

 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    5


Table of Contents

KEY FACTORS AFFECTING FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE

Our financial performance is substantially affected by a number of external factors outside of our control, including the following:

   

General economic conditions, including the continuity, speed and stamina of the moderate U.S. economic recovery in general and on our customers in particular,

   

The level of, and direction, timing and magnitude of movement in, interest rates and the shape of the interest rate yield curve,

   

The functioning and other performance of, and availability of liquidity in, the capital and other financial markets,

   

Loan demand, utilization of credit commitments and standby letters of credit, and asset quality,

   

Customer demand for non-loan products and services,

   

Changes in the competitive and regulatory landscape and in counterparty creditworthiness and performance as the financial services industry restructures in the current environment,

   

The impact of the extensive reforms enacted in the Dodd-Frank legislation and other legislative, regulatory and administrative initiatives, including those outlined elsewhere in this Report, in our 2012 Form 10-K and in our other SEC filings, and

   

The impact of market credit spreads on asset valuations.

In addition, our success will depend upon, among other things:

   

Further success in growing profitability through the acquisition and retention of customers,

   

Continued development of the geographic markets related to our recent acquisitions, including full deployment of our product offerings into our Southeast markets,

   

Our ability to effectively manage PNC’s balance sheet and generate net interest income,

   

Revenue growth and our ability to provide innovative and valued products to our customers,

   

Our ability to utilize technology to develop and deliver products and services to our customers and protect PNC’s systems and customer information,

   

Our ability to manage and implement strategic business objectives within the changing regulatory environment,

   

A sustained focus on expense management,

   

Managing the non-strategic assets portfolio and impaired assets,

   

Improving our overall asset quality,

   

Continuing to maintain and grow our deposit base as a low-cost funding source,

   

Prudent risk and capital management related to our efforts to manage risk to acceptable levels and to meet evolving regulatory capital standards,

   

Actions we take within the capital and other financial markets,

   

The impact of legal and regulatory-related contingencies, and

   

The appropriateness of reserves needed for critical estimates and related contingencies.

For additional information, please see the Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information section in this Financial Review and Item 1A Risk Factors in our 2012 Form 10-K.

INCOME STATEMENT HIGHLIGHTS

   

Net income for the second quarter of 2013 of $1.1 billion increased $.6 billion compared to the second quarter of 2012, driven by revenue growth of 12%, a decline in noninterest expense of 8% and a decrease in provision for credit losses. For additional detail, please see the Consolidated Income Statement Review section in this Financial Review.

   

Net interest income of $2.3 billion for the second quarter of 2013 decreased 11% compared with the second quarter of 2012, reflecting the impact of lower purchase accounting accretion and lower yields on loans and securities, partially offset by lower rates paid on borrowed funds.

   

Net interest margin decreased to 3.58% for the second quarter of 2013 compared to 4.08% for the second quarter of 2012. Consistent with the decline in net interest income, the decrease in net interest margin reflected lower purchase accounting accretion and lower yields on loans and securities, partially offset by lower rates paid on borrowed funds.

   

Noninterest income of $1.8 billion for the second quarter of 2013 increased by $.7 billion compared to the second quarter of 2012. The increase was attributable to lower provision for residential mortgage repurchase obligations, strong customer fee income and higher gains on asset sales and valuations.

   

The provision for credit losses decreased to $157 million for the second quarter of 2013 compared to $256 million for the second quarter of 2012 driven by overall credit quality improvement.

   

Noninterest expense of $2.4 billion for the second quarter of 2013 decreased 8% compared with the second quarter of 2012, primarily due to lower noncash charges related to redemption of trust preferred securities, the impact of second quarter 2012 integration costs, and lower residential mortgage foreclosure-related expenses.

CREDIT QUALITY HIGHLIGHTS

   

Overall credit quality improved during the second quarter of 2013. The following comparisons to December 31, 2012 were impacted by alignment with interagency guidance in the first quarter of 2013 on

 

 

6    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents
 

practices for loans and lines of credit related to consumer lending. This had the overall effect of (i) accelerating charge-offs, (ii) increasing nonperforming loans and (iii), in the case of loans accounted for under the fair value option, increasing nonaccrual loans. In addition, commercial real estate delinquencies declined due to improved performance. See the Credit Risk Management section of this Financial Review for further detail.

   

Nonperforming assets of $3.8 billion at June 30, 2013 remained relatively flat compared to December 31, 2012. The comparison includes the addition of $426 million of consumer loans to nonperforming pursuant to alignment with interagency guidance for loans and lines of credit that occurred in the first quarter of 2013, substantially offset by a reduction in total commercial nonperforming loans due to credit quality improvement and lower consumer nonperforming loans largely due to principal activity. Nonperforming assets to total assets were 1.24% at both June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 compared with 1.39% at June 30, 2012.

   

Overall delinquencies of $2.8 billion decreased $.9 billion as of June 30, 2013 compared with December 31, 2012. The reduction was partially due to a decline in total consumer loan delinquencies of $395 million pursuant to alignment with interagency guidance in which loans were moved from various delinquency categories to either nonperforming or, in the case of loans accounted for under the fair value option, nonaccruing. In addition, during the first six months of 2013, government insured residential real estate accruing loans past due 90 days or more declined $324 million, the majority of which were transferred to OREO. Finally, commercial real estate delinquencies decreased $84 million due to improved performance.

   

Net charge-offs of $208 million decreased $107 million compared to the second quarter of 2012, reflecting a decrease in home equity, commercial and commercial real estate net charge-offs of $97 million. On an annualized basis, net charge-offs were 0.44% of average loans for the second quarter of 2013 and 0.71% of average loans for the second quarter of 2012. Net charge-offs for the first six months were $664 million, up slightly compared to $648 million of net charge-offs for the first six months of 2012, due to the impact of alignment with interagency guidance in first quarter 2013, partially offset by improving credit quality in the second quarter of 2013. On an annualized basis, net charge-offs for the first half of 2013 were 0.71% of average loans and 0.76% of average loans for the first half of 2012.

   

The allowance for loan and lease losses was 1.99% of total loans and 114% of nonperforming loans at June 30, 2013, compared with 2.17% and 124% at December 31, 2012, respectively. The decrease in the

   

allowance compared with year end resulted from improved overall credit quality and the impact of alignment with interagency guidance.

BALANCE SHEET HIGHLIGHTS

   

Total loans increased by $3.9 billion to $190 billion at June 30, 2013 compared to December 31, 2012.

   

Total commercial lending increased by $4.3 billion, or 4%, from December 31, 2012, as a result of growth in commercial loans to new and existing customers.

   

Total consumer lending decreased $.4 billion from December 31, 2012 primarily from pay downs of residential real estate, education and credit card loans, partially offset by increases in home equity and automobile loans.

   

Total deposits decreased by $0.9 billion to $212 billion at June 30, 2013 compared with December 31, 2012.

   

PNC’s well-positioned balance sheet remained core funded with a loans to deposits ratio of 89% at June 30, 2013.

   

PNC had a strong capital position at June 30, 2013.

   

The Basel I Tier 1 common capital ratio increased to 10.1% compared with 9.6% at December 31, 2012.

   

The pro forma Basel III Tier 1 common capital ratio was an estimated 8.2% at June 30, 2013 compared with 7.5% at December 31, 2012 without benefit of phase-ins.

   

PNC continues to evaluate the Basel III final rules adopted in July 2013. Pending completion of that evaluation this estimate is based on our understanding of the prior U.S. Basel III rule proposals issued in 2012. We do not believe the changes in the final rules from the proposals will negatively impact our common capital ratio.

   

See the Capital discussion and Table 22: Estimated Pro forma Basel III Tier 1 Common Capital Ratio in the Consolidated Balance Sheet Review section of this Financial Review for more detail.

   

In April 2013, the PNC board of directors raised the quarterly cash dividend on common stock to 44 cents per share, an increase of 4 cents per share, or 10%, effective with the May dividend.

Our Consolidated Income Statement and Consolidated Balance Sheet Review sections of this Financial Review describe in greater detail the various items that impacted our results for the first six months of 2013 and 2012 and balances at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    7


Table of Contents

2012 ACQUISITION AND DIVESTITURE ACTIVITY

On March 2, 2012, we acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding common stock of RBC Bank (USA), the U.S. retail banking subsidiary of Royal Bank of Canada. As part of the acquisition, PNC also purchased a credit card portfolio from RBC Bank (Georgia), National Association.

Effective October 26, 2012, PNC divested certain deposits and assets of the Smartstreet business unit, which was acquired by PNC as part of the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition, to Union Bank, N.A.

See Note 2 Acquisition and Divestiture Activity in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in this Report for additional information regarding this 2012 acquisition and divestiture activity.

AVERAGE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET HIGHLIGHTS

Table 2: Summarized Average Balance Sheet

 

Six months ended June 30

Dollars in millions

   2013      2012  

Average assets

       

Interest-earning assets

       

Investment securities

   $ 57,683       $ 61,469   

Loans

     187,359         171,239   

Other

     11,099         11,225   

Total interest-earning assets

     256,141         243,933   

Other

     46,591         44,914   

Total average assets

   $ 302,732       $ 288,847   

Average liabilities and equity

       

Interest-bearing liabilities

       

Interest-bearing deposits

   $ 145,014       $ 138,220   

Borrowed funds

     39,161         41,668   

Total interest-bearing liabilities

     184,175         179,888   

Noninterest-bearing deposits

     64,800         59,189   

Other liabilities

     11,650         11,023   

Equity

     42,107         38,747   

Total average liabilities and equity

   $ 302,732       $ 288,847   

Various seasonal and other factors impact our period-end balances, whereas average balances are generally more indicative of underlying business trends apart from the impact of acquisitions and divestitures. The Consolidated Balance Sheet Review section of this Financial Review provides information on changes in selected Consolidated Balance Sheet categories at June 30, 2013 compared with December 31, 2012.

Total average assets increased to $302.7 billion for the first six months of 2013 compared with $288.8 billion for the first six months of 2012, primarily due to an increase of $12.2 billion in average interest-earning assets driven by an increase in average total loans, including the impact of loans added in the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition, which closed March 2, 2012.

Total assets were $304.4 billion at June 30, 2013 compared with $305.1 billion at December 31, 2012.

Average total loans increased by $16.1 billion to $187.4 billion for the first six months of 2013 compared with the six months of 2012, including increases in average commercial loans of $11.5 billion and average consumer loans of $3.0 billion. The overall increase in loans reflected organic loan growth, primarily in our Corporate & Institutional Banking segment, as well as the impact of loans added in the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition.

Loans represented 73% of average interest-earning assets for the first six months of 2013 and 70% of average interest-earning assets for the first six months of 2012.

Average investment securities decreased $3.8 billion to $57.7 billion in the first six months of 2013 compared with the first six months of 2012, primarily as a result of principal payments, including prepayments and maturities, partially offset by net purchase activity. During the second quarter of 2013, we entered into certain transactions to purchase securities that will be delivered in the third and fourth quarters of 2013. Total investment securities comprised 23% of average interest-earning assets for the first six months of 2013 and 25% for the first six months of 2012.

Average noninterest-earning assets increased $1.7 billion to $46.6 billion in the six months of 2013 compared with the six months of 2012. The increase included the impact of higher adjustments for net unrealized gains on securities, which are included in noninterest-earning assets for average balance sheet purposes, the six month impact of the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition, including goodwill, and an increase in equity investments. These increases were partially offset by decreased unsettled securities sales, which are included in noninterest-earning assets for average balance sheet purposes.

Average total deposits were $209.8 billion for the first six months of 2013 compared with $197.4 billion for the first six months of 2012. The increase of $12.4 billion primarily resulted from an increase of $17.4 billion in average transaction deposits which grew to $173.6 billion for the first six months of 2013 compared with $156.2 billion for the first six months of 2012. Growth in average interest-bearing demand deposits, average noninterest-bearing deposits and average money market deposits drove the increase in average transaction deposits, which resulted from the six month impact of the RBC Bank (USA) acquired deposits and organic growth. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $5.1 billion in average retail certificates of deposit attributable to runoff of maturing accounts. Total deposits at June 30, 2013 were $212.3 billion compared with $213.1 billion at December 31, 2012 and are further discussed within the Consolidated Balance Sheet Review section of this Financial Review.

Average total deposits represented 69% of average total assets for the first six months of 2013 and 68% for the first six months of 2012.

 

 

8    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

Average borrowed funds decreased by $2.5 billion to $39.2 billion for the first six months of 2013 compared with the first six months of 2012. Lower average Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) borrowings were partially offset by an increase in average commercial paper. Total borrowed funds at June 30, 2013 were $39.9 billion compared with $40.9 billion at December 31, 2012 and are further discussed within the Consolidated Balance Sheet Review section of this Financial Review. The Liquidity Risk Management portion of the Risk Management section of this Financial Review includes additional information regarding our borrowed funds.

BUSINESS SEGMENT HIGHLIGHTS

Total business segment earnings were $1.9 billion for the first six months of 2013 and $1.6 billion for the first six months of 2012. Highlights of results for the first six months and the second quarter of 2013 and 2012 are included below. The Business Segments Review section of this Financial Review includes further analysis of our business segment results over the first six months of 2013 and 2012, including presentation differences from Note 19 Segment Reporting in our Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements of this Report.

We provide a reconciliation of total business segment earnings to PNC total consolidated net income as reported on a GAAP basis in Note 19 Segment Reporting in our Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements of this Report.

Table 3: Results Of Businesses – Summary

(Unaudited)

 

     Net Income     Revenue      Average Assets (a)  
Six months ended June 30-in millions    2013      2012     2013      2012      2013      2012  

Retail Banking

   $ 278       $ 283      $ 3,037       $ 2,987       $ 74,317       $ 71,420   

Corporate & Institutional Banking

     1,153         1,072        2,761         2,705         111,941         97,866   

Asset Management Group

     79         74        509         483         7,210         6,613   

Residential Mortgage Banking

     65         (152     519         184         10,604         11,745   

BlackRock

     220         178        287         227         5,982         5,597   

Non-Strategic Assets Portfolio

     139         138        394         421         10,511         12,407   

Total business segments

     1,934         1,593        7,507         7,007         220,565         205,648   

Other (b) (c)

     193         (236     512         348         82,167         83,199   

Total

   $ 2,127       $ 1,357      $ 8,019       $ 7,355       $ 302,732       $ 288,847   
(a) Period-end balances for BlackRock.
(b) “Other” average assets include securities available for sale associated with asset and liability management activities.
(c) “Other” includes differences between the total business segment financial results and our total consolidated net income. Additional detail is included in the Business Segments Review section of this Financial Review and in Note 19 Segment Reporting in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in this Report.

 

Retail Banking

Retail Banking earned $278 million in the first six months of 2013 compared with $283 million for the same period a year ago. Earnings were essentially flat compared to a year ago as higher noninterest income was offset by lower net interest income and higher noninterest expense. Retail Banking’s core strategy is to efficiently grow customers by providing an experience that builds customer loyalty and expands loan, investment product, and money management share of wallet. Net checking relationships grew 114,000 in the first six months of 2013. The growth reflects strong results and gains in all of our markets, as well as strong customer retention in the overall network.

In the second quarter of 2013, Retail Banking earned $158 million compared with earnings of $136 million for the second quarter of 2012. The increase in earnings was primarily due to the gain on sale of 2 million Visa Class B common shares, higher fee income, lower provision for credit losses and lower additions to legal reserves. These increases were partially offset by a decline in net interest income.

Corporate & Institutional Banking

Corporate & Institutional Banking earned $1.2 billion in the first six months of 2013 as compared with $1.1 billion in the first six months of 2012. The increase in earnings was primarily due to an increase in noninterest income and improved credit quality, partially offset by lower net interest income. We continued to focus on building client relationships, including increasing cross sales and adding new clients where the risk-return profile was attractive.

In the second quarter of 2013, Corporate & Institutional Banking earned $612 million compared with earnings of $577 million in the second quarter of 2012. The increase reflected higher noninterest income and a benefit on the provision for credit losses, which were partially offset by a decrease in net interest income.

Asset Management Group

Asset Management Group earned $79 million through the first six months of 2013 compared with $74 million in the same period of 2012. The increase in earnings was due to higher

 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    9


Table of Contents

revenue of $26 million partially offset by higher noninterest expense. Assets under administration were $233 billion as of June 30, 2013 compared to $214 billion as of June 30, 2012. The core growth strategies for the business continue to include: investing in higher growth geographies, increasing internal referral sales and adding new front line sales staff.

In the second quarter of 2013, Asset Management Group earned $36 million compared with $38 million in the second quarter of 2012. The decrease is primarily due to an increase in noninterest expense from strategic business investments and an increase in the provision for credit losses.

Residential Mortgage Banking

Residential Mortgage Banking reported earnings of $65 million in the first six months of 2013 compared with losses of $152 million in the first six months of 2012. Earnings increased from the prior year six month period primarily as a result of decreased provision for residential mortgage repurchase obligations.

In the second quarter of 2013, Residential Mortgage Banking reported earnings of $20 million compared with a loss of $213 million in the second quarter of 2012 due to a decrease in provision for residential mortgage repurchase obligations and a decrease in the noninterest expense.

BlackRock

Our BlackRock business segment earned $220 million in the first six months of 2013 and $178 million in the first six months of 2012. In the second quarter of 2013, business segment earnings from BlackRock were $112 million compared with $88 million in the second quarter of 2012.

Non-Strategic Assets Portfolio

This business segment consists primarily of acquired non-strategic assets. Non-Strategic Assets Portfolio had earnings of $139 million for the first six months of 2013 compared with $138 million in the first six months of 2012. Earnings were relatively flat year-over-year as higher noninterest income and lower noninterest expense were offset by lower net interest income and a higher provision for credit losses.

In the second quarter of 2013, Non-Strategic Assets Portfolio had earnings of $60 million compared with $67 million for the second quarter of 2012. The decrease was due to a decrease in net interest income driven by lower purchase accounting accretion and lower loan balances.

Other

“Other” reported earnings of $193 million for the six months of 2013 compared with a loss of $236 million for the first six months of 2012. In the second quarter of 2013, “Other” reported earnings of $125 million compared with a loss of $147 million in the second quarter of 2012.

 

 

10    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT REVIEW

Our Consolidated Income Statement is presented in Part I, Item 1 of this Report.

Net income for the first six months of 2013 was $2.1 billion, compared with net income of $1.4 billion for the first six months of 2012. The increase in year-over-year net income was driven by revenue growth of 9%, a decline in noninterest expense of 5% and a decrease in provision for credit losses. Higher revenue for the first six months of 2013 reflected lower provision for residential mortgage repurchase obligations, strong customer fee income and higher gains on asset sales and valuations and was partially offset by lower net interest income.

Net income for the second quarter of 2013 was $1.1 billion compared with $.5 billion for the second quarter of 2012. The increase in net income was due to revenue growth of 12%, a decline in noninterest expense of 8% and a decrease in provision for credit losses. Higher revenue for the second quarter of 2013 reflected lower provision for residential mortgage repurchase obligations, strong customer fee income and higher gains on asset sales and valuations, partially offset by lower net interest income.

NET INTEREST INCOME

Table 4: Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin

 

    

Six months ended

June 30

    

Three months ended

June 30

 
Dollars in millions    2013      2012      2013      2012  

Net interest income

   $ 4,647       $ 4,817       $ 2,258       $ 2,526   

Net interest margin

     3.69      3.99      3.58      4.08

Changes in net interest income and margin result from the interaction of the volume and composition of interest-earning assets and related yields, interest-bearing liabilities and related rates paid, and noninterest-bearing sources of funding. See the Statistical Information (Unaudited) – Average Consolidated Balance Sheet And Net Interest Analysis section of this Report and the discussion of purchase accounting accretion of purchased impaired loans in the Consolidated Balance Sheet review of this Report for additional information.

Net interest income decreased by $170 million, or 4%, in the first half of 2013 compared with the first half of 2012. Net interest income decreased by $268 million, or 11%, in the

second quarter of 2013 compared with the second quarter of 2012. The decline in both comparisons reflected lower purchase accounting accretion, the impact of lower yields on loans and securities, as well as the impact of lower securities balances during the quarter as a result of portfolio management activities. The impact of the decline in earning asset yields and lower security balances was partially offset by increases in loan balances, reflecting commercial and consumer loan growth over the period, and lower rates paid on borrowed funds. The six months period comparison was also impacted by the March 2012 RBC Bank (USA) acquisition.

During the second quarter of 2013, we entered into transactions to purchase securities that will be delivered in the third and fourth quarters of 2013. As a result, we expect interest income from securities to improve in the third quarter versus second quarter.

The declines in net interest margin for both the first six months and second quarter of 2013 compared with the 2012 periods reflected lower purchase accounting accretion and lower yields on earning assets.

The decrease for the first six months of 2013 included a 43 basis point decrease in the yield on total interest-earning assets, partially offset by a decrease in the weighted-average rate accrued on total interest-bearing liabilities of 17 basis points. In the second quarter comparison, the yield on total interest-earning assets decreased 60 basis points, partially offset by a decrease in the weighted-average rate accrued on total interest-bearing liabilities of 12 basis points.

The decreases in the yield on interest-earning assets were primarily due to lower rates on new loans and purchased securities in the ongoing low rate environment. The decreases in the rate accrued on interest-bearing liabilities were primarily due to net redemptions and maturities of bank notes and senior debt and subordinated debt, including the redemption of trust preferred and hybrid capital securities.

With respect to the third quarter of 2013, we expect net interest income to be modestly lower as we expect the continuing impact of lower loan and security yields and a decline in purchase accounting accretion to be partially offset by loan growth and the impact of our securities portfolio management activities.

For the full year 2013, we expect net interest income to decrease compared with 2012, assuming an expected decline in the purchase accounting accretion component of net interest income of approximately $350 million.

 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    11


Table of Contents

NONINTEREST INCOME

Table 5: Noninterest Income

 

    

Six months ended

June 30

   

Three months ended

June 30

 
Dollars in millions    2013     2012     2013     2012  

Noninterest income

          

Asset management

   $ 648      $ 562      $ 340      $ 278   

Consumer services

     610        554        314        290   

Corporate services

     603        522        326        290   

Residential mortgage

     401        57        167        (173

Service charges on deposits

     283        271        147        144   

Net gains on sales of securities

     75        119        61        62   

Net other-than-temporary impairments

     (14     (72     (4     (34

Other

     766        525        455        240   

Total noninterest income

   $ 3,372      $ 2,538      $ 1,806      $ 1,097   

Noninterest income increased by $834 million, or 33%, during the first half of 2013 compared to the first half of 2012. Noninterest income for the second quarter increased by $709 million, or 65%, compared to the second quarter of 2012. Both increases were driven by lower provision for residential mortgage repurchase obligations in the 2013 periods, strong customer fee income and higher gains on asset sales and valuations.

Asset management revenue, including BlackRock, increased $86 million, or 15% in the first six months of 2013 compared to the first six months of 2012. The comparison included an increase of $62 million, or 22%, in the second quarter compared to the prior year quarter. Both increases were due to higher earnings from our BlackRock investment, stronger equity markets and growth in customers. Discretionary assets under management increased to $117 billion at June 30, 2013 compared with $109 billion at June 30, 2012 driven by stronger average equity markets and positive net flows.

Consumer service fees increased $56 million in the first six months of 2013 compared to the first six months of 2012 and increased $24 million in the second quarter of 2013 compared to the second quarter of 2012. Both increases reflected growth in debit card, brokerage, credit card and merchant services revenue. The six month comparison was also impacted by the March 2012 RBC Bank (USA) acquisition.

Corporate services revenue increased to $603 million in the first six months of 2013 compared with $522 million in the first six months of 2012, including $326 million in the second quarter of 2013 compared with $290 million in the second quarter of 2012. Corporate services revenue for the first six months of 2013 included $55 million related to valuation gains from the impact of rising interest rates on commercial

mortgage servicing rights valuations, including $44 million in the second quarter. These amounts contributed to increases in commercial mortgage servicing revenue, as the comparable amounts for the 2012 periods were not significant. In addition, the increase in the six months comparison also reflected higher treasury management fees. The increases in both comparisons were partially offset by lower merger and acquisition advisory fees.

Residential mortgage revenue increased to $401 million in the first six months of 2013 compared with $57 million in the first six months of 2012. The second quarter comparables were revenue of $167 million in the second quarter of 2013 and a loss of $173 million for the second quarter of 2012. Residential mortgage revenue for the first six months of 2013 included provision for residential mortgage repurchase obligations of $77 million compared to $470 million for the first six months of 2012. The comparable amounts for the second quarters of 2013 and 2012 were $73 million and $438 million, respectively. See the Recourse and Repurchase Obligations section of this Financial Review for further detail. These increases to both 2013 periods in residential mortgage revenue were partially offset by lower net hedging gains on mortgage servicing rights.

Other noninterest income totaled $766 million for the first six months of 2013 compared with $525 million for the first six months of 2012. Other noninterest income totaled $455 million for the second quarter of 2013 and $240 million for the second quarter of 2012. The increases in both 2013 periods included the $83 million gain on the sale of 2 million Visa Class B common shares during the second quarter of 2013. Other noninterest income for the first six months of 2013 also included $41 million of revenue from credit valuations related to customer-initiated hedging activities as higher market interest rates reduced the fair value of PNC’s credit exposure on these activities. The comparable amount for the first six months of 2012 was a loss of $28 million. The impacts to the second quarters of 2013 and 2012 were revenue of $39 million and a loss of $35 million, respectively. In addition, the increase in other noninterest income in the year-to-date comparison also reflected higher revenue associated with commercial mortgage banking activity.

We continue to hold approximately 12 million Visa Class B common shares with an estimated fair value of approximately $950 million and recorded investment of approximately $204 million as of June 30, 2013.

Other noninterest income typically fluctuates from period to period depending on the nature and magnitude of transactions completed. Further details regarding our trading activities are included in the Market Risk Management – Trading Risk portion of the Risk Management section of this Financial Review. Further details regarding private and other equity investments are included in the Market Risk Management – Equity And Other Investment Risk section, and further details

 

 

12    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

regarding gains or losses related to our equity investment in BlackRock are included in the Business Segments Review section.

For 2013, we continue to expect both full year 2013 noninterest income and total revenue to increase compared with 2012.

PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES

The provision for credit losses totaled $393 million for the first half of 2013 compared with $441 million for the first half of 2012. The provision for credit losses was $157 million for the second quarter of 2013 compared with $256 million for the second quarter of 2012. The declines in the comparisons were driven primarily by overall commercial credit quality improvement.

We expect our provision for credit losses for the third quarter of 2013 to be between $170 million and $250 million as we expect the pace of commercial credit improvement to ease and net credit exposure to increase.

The Credit Risk Management portion of the Risk Management section of this Financial Review includes additional information regarding factors impacting the provision for credit losses.

NONINTEREST EXPENSE

Noninterest expense was $4.8 billion for the first half of 2013, a decrease of $.3 billion, or 5%, from $5.1 billion for the first half of 2012. Noninterest expense for the first six months of 2013 included $30 million of noncash charges related to redemption of trust preferred securities and $18 million of residential mortgage foreclosure-related expenses. The first half of 2012 included $197 million of integration costs, noncash charges of $130 million related to redemption of trust preferred securities and $81 million of residential mortgage foreclosure-related expenses. These decreases to noninterest expense were partially offset by the impact of higher operating expense for the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition during the first half of 2013 compared to the first six months of 2012.

Noninterest expense decreased $.2 billion, or 8%, to $2.4 billion for the second quarter of 2013 compared with $2.6 billion for the second quarter of 2012. The second quarter of 2013 included $30 million of noncash charges related to redemption of trust preferred securities, while the second quarter of 2012 included $130 million of noncash charges related to redemption of trust preferred securities, $52 million of integration costs and $43 million of residential mortgage foreclosure-related expenses. The impact of residential mortgage foreclosure-related expenses in second quarter 2013 was not significant.

The decline in noninterest expense in the comparison also reflected our continued commitment to disciplined expense management, and we currently expect to exceed our $700 million continuous improvement savings goal for 2013. Through the first half of the year, we have captured approximately $600 million of annualized savings. Cost savings are expected to offset investments we are making in our businesses and infrastructure.

For the third quarter of 2013, we currently expect noninterest expenses to be modestly up compared to the second quarter of 2013.

We expect noninterest expense for 2013 to decline by at least five percent compared with 2012.

EFFECTIVE INCOME TAX RATE

The effective income tax rate was 23.9% in the first six months of 2013 compared with 25.1% in the first six months of 2012. For the second quarter of 2013, our effective income tax rate was 23.7% compared with 24.1% for the second quarter of 2012. The effective tax rate is generally lower than the statutory rate primarily due to tax credits PNC receives from our investments in low income housing and new markets investments, as well as increased earnings in other tax exempt investments.

The decrease in the effective tax rate for the second quarter and the first six months of 2013 compared to the 2012 periods resulted from increased tax exempt investments and tax benefits from tax audit settlements, partially offset by higher levels of pretax income.

 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    13


Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET REVIEW

Table 6: Summarized Balance Sheet Data

 

In millions    June 30
2013
    December 31
2012
 

Assets

      

Loans held for sale

   $ 3,814      $ 3,693   

Investment securities

     57,449        61,406   

Loans

     189,775        185,856   

Allowance for loan and lease losses

     (3,772     (4,036

Goodwill

     9,075        9,072   

Other intangible assets

     2,153        1,797   

Other, net

     45,921        47,319   

Total assets

   $ 304,415      $ 305,107   

Liabilities

      

Deposits

   $ 212,279      $ 213,142   

Borrowed funds

     39,864        40,907   

Other

     10,331        9,293   

Total liabilities

     262,474        263,342   

Equity

      

Total shareholders’ equity

     40,286        39,003   

Noncontrolling interests

     1,655        2,762   

Total equity

     41,941        41,765   

Total liabilities and equity

   $ 304,415      $ 305,107   

The summarized balance sheet data above is based upon our Consolidated Balance Sheet in this Report.

Total assets decreased $692 million, or less than 1%, at June 30, 2013 compared with December 31, 2012. Total liabilities declined $868 million, or less than 1%, in the same comparison. An analysis of changes in selected balance sheet categories follows.

LOANS

A summary of the major categories of loans outstanding follows. Outstanding loan balances of $189.8 billion at June 30, 2013 and $185.9 billion at December 31, 2012 were net of unearned income, net deferred loan fees, unamortized discounts and premiums, and purchase discounts and premiums of $2.3 billion at June 30, 2013 and $2.7 billion at December 31, 2012, respectively. The balances include purchased impaired loans but do not include future accretable net interest (i.e., the difference between the undiscounted expected cash flows and the carrying value of the loan) on those loans.

Table 7: Details Of Loans

 

In millions    June 30
2013
     December 31
2012
 

Commercial lending

       

Commercial

       

Retail/wholesale trade

   $ 14,466       $ 13,801   

Manufacturing

     14,270         13,856   

Service providers

     12,758         12,095   

Real estate related (a)

     10,248         10,616   

Financial services (b)

     10,834         9,026   

Health care

     7,618         7,267   

Other industries

     16,736         16,379   

Total commercial

     86,930         83,040   

Commercial real estate

       

Real estate projects (c)

     12,636         12,347   

Commercial mortgage

     6,355         6,308   

Total commercial real estate

     18,991         18,655   

Equipment lease financing

     7,349         7,247   

Total commercial lending (d)

     113,270         108,942   

Consumer lending

       

Home equity

       

Lines of credit

     22,559         23,576   

Installment

     13,857         12,344   

Total home equity

     36,416         35,920   

Residential real estate

       

Residential mortgage

     14,051         14,430   

Residential construction

     726         810   

Total residential real estate

     14,777         15,240   

Credit card

     4,135         4,303   

Other consumer

       

Education

     7,814         8,238   

Automobile

     9,066         8,708   

Other

     4,297         4,505   

Total consumer lending

     76,505         76,914   

Total loans

   $ 189,775       $ 185,856   
(a) Includes loans to customers in the real estate and construction industries.
(b) Includes loans issued to a Financing Special Purpose Entity which holds receivables from the other industries within Commercial Lending.
(c) Includes both construction loans and intermediate financing for projects.
(d) Construction loans with interest reserves and A/B Note restructurings are not significant to PNC.

The increase in loans of $3.9 billion from December 31, 2012 included an increase in commercial lending of $4.3 billion and a decrease in consumer lending of $.4 billion. The increase in commercial lending was the result of growth in commercial

 

 

14    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

loans, primarily from an increase in loan commitments to new and existing customers. The decline in consumer lending resulted from pay downs of residential real estate, education, credit card and other loans, along with the movement of residential real estate loans to OREO and charge-offs taken in the first quarter of 2013 related to the alignment with interagency supervisory guidance, partially offset by net growth in home equity and increases in indirect auto loans.

Loans represented 62% of total assets at June 30, 2013 and 61% of total assets at December 31, 2012. Commercial lending represented 60% of the loan portfolio at June 30, 2013 and 59% at December 31, 2012. Consumer lending represented 40% of the loan portfolio at June 30, 2013 and 41% at December 31, 2012.

Commercial real estate loans represented 10% of total loans and 6% of total assets at both June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. See the Credit Risk Management portion of the Risk Management section of this Financial Review for additional details of loans.

Total loans above include purchased impaired loans of $6.8 billion, or 4% of total loans, at June 30, 2013, and $7.4 billion, or 4% of total loans, at December 31, 2012.

Our loan portfolio continued to be diversified among numerous industries, types of businesses and consumers across our principal geographic markets.

The Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses (ALLL) and the Allowance for Unfunded Loan Commitments and Letters of Credit are sensitive to changes in assumptions and judgments and are inherently subjective as they require material estimates, all of which may be susceptible to significant change, including, among others:

   

Probability of default,

   

Loss given default,

   

Exposure at date of default,

   

Movement through delinquency stages,

   

Amounts and timing of expected cash flows,

   

Value of collateral, which may be obtained from third parties, and

   

Qualitative factors, such as changes in current economic conditions, that may not be reflected in historical results.

HIGHER RISK LOANS

Our total ALLL of $3.8 billion at June 30, 2013 consisted of $1.7 billion and $2.1 billion established for the commercial lending and consumer lending categories, respectively. The ALLL included what we believe to be appropriate loss coverage on higher risk loans in the commercial and consumer

portfolios. We do not consider government insured or guaranteed loans to be higher risk as defaults have historically been materially mitigated by payments of insurance or guarantee amounts for approved claims. Additional information regarding our higher risk loans is included in the Credit Risk Management portion of the Risk Management section of this Financial Review and in Note 5 Asset Quality and Note 7 Allowances for Loan and Lease Losses and Unfunded Loan Commitments and Letters of Credit in our Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Report.

PURCHASE ACCOUNTING ACCRETION AND VALUATION OF PURCHASED IMPAIRED LOANS

Information related to purchase accounting accretion and accretable yield for the second quarter and first six months of 2013 and 2012 follows. Additional information is provided in Note 6 Purchased Loans in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in this Report.

Table 8: Accretion – Purchased Impaired Loans

 

     Three months ended
June 30
    Six months ended
June 30
 
In millions    2013     2012     2013     2012  

Accretion on purchased impaired loans

          

Scheduled accretion

   $ 150      $ 178      $ 307      $ 336   

Reversal of contractual interest on impaired loans

     (83     (111     (168     (208

Scheduled accretion net of contractual interest

     67        67        139        128   

Excess cash recoveries

     11        51        61        91   

Total

   $ 78      $ 118      $ 200      $ 219   

Table 9: Purchased Impaired Loans – Accretable Yield

 

In millions    2013     2012  

January 1

   $ 2,166      $ 2,109   

Addition of accretable yield due to RBC Bank (USA) acquisition on March 2, 2012

       587   

Scheduled accretion

     (307     (336

Excess cash recoveries

     (61     (91

Net reclassifications to accretable from non-accretable and other activity (a)

     366        134   

June 30 (b)

   $ 2,164      $ 2,403   
(a) Approximately 58% of the net reclassifications for the first six months of 2013 were driven by the consumer portfolio and were due to improvements of cash expected to be collected on both RBC Bank (USA) and National City loans in future periods. The remaining net reclassifications were predominantly due to future cash flow changes in the commercial portfolio.
(b) As of June 30, 2013, we estimate that the reversal of contractual interest on purchased impaired loans will total approximately $1.2 billion in future periods. This will offset the total net accretable interest in future interest income of $2.2 billion on purchased impaired loans.
 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    15


Table of Contents

Information related to the valuation of purchased impaired loans at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 follows.

Table 10: Valuation of Purchased Impaired Loans

 

     June 30, 2013     December 31, 2012  
Dollars in millions    Balance      Net Investment     Balance      Net Investment  

Commercial and commercial real estate loans:

            

Unpaid principal balance

   $ 1,299         $ 1,680        

Purchased impaired mark

     (331              (431         

Recorded investment

     968           1,249        

Allowance for loan losses

     (183              (239         

Net investment

     785         60     1,010         60

Consumer and residential mortgage loans:

            

Unpaid principal balance

     6,095           6,639        

Purchased impaired mark

     (285              (482         

Recorded investment

     5,810           6,157        

Allowance for loan losses

     (934              (858         

Net investment

     4,876         80     5,299         80

Total purchased impaired loans:

            

Unpaid principal balance

     7,394           8,319        

Purchased impaired mark

     (616              (913         

Recorded investment

     6,778           7,406        

Allowance for loan losses

     (1,117              (1,097         

Net investment

   $ 5,661         77   $ 6,309         76

 

The unpaid principal balance of purchased impaired loans decreased to $7.4 billion at June 30, 2013 from $8.3 billion at December 31, 2012 due to payments, disposals and charge-offs of amounts determined to be uncollectible. The remaining purchased impaired mark at June 30, 2013 was $616 million, which was a decrease from $913 million at December 31, 2012. The associated allowance for loan losses remained relatively flat at $1.1 billion. The net investment of $5.7 billion at June 30, 2013 decreased 10% from $6.3 billion at December 31, 2012. At June 30, 2013, our largest individual purchased impaired loan had a recorded investment of $19 million.

We currently expect to collect total cash flows of $7.9 billion on purchased impaired loans, representing the $5.7 billion net investment at June 30, 2013 and the accretable net interest of $2.2 billion shown in Table 9: Purchased Impaired Loans – Accretable Yield.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE LIFE OF THE PURCHASED IMPAIRED PORTFOLIOS

The table below provides the weighted average life (WAL) for each of the purchased impaired portfolios as of the second quarter of 2013.

Table 11: Weighted Average Life of the Purchased Impaired Portfolios

 

As of June 30, 2013

In millions

  

Recorded

Investment

     WAL (a)  

Commercial

   $ 231         2.0 years   

Commercial real estate

     737         1.8 years   

Consumer (b)

     2,474         4.7 years   

Residential real estate

     3,336         4.8 years   

Total

   $ 6,778         4.3 years   
(a) Weighted average life represents the average number of years for which each dollar of unpaid principal remains outstanding.
(b) Portfolio primarily consists of nonrevolving home equity products.
 

 

16    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

PURCHASED IMPAIRED LOANS – ACCRETABLE DIFFERENCE SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

The following table provides a sensitivity analysis on the Purchased Impaired Loans portfolio. The analysis reflects hypothetical changes in key drivers for expected cash flows over the life of the loans under declining and improving conditions at a point in time. Any unusual significant economic events or changes, as well as other variables not considered below (e.g., natural or widespread disasters), could result in impacts outside of the ranges represented below. Additionally, commercial and commercial real estate loan settlements or sales proceeds can vary widely from appraised values due to a number of factors including, but not limited to, special use considerations, liquidity premiums and improvements/deterioration in other income sources.

Table 12: Accretable Difference Sensitivity – Total Purchased Impaired Loans

 

In billions   

June 30,

2013

   

Declining

Scenario (a)

   

Improving

Scenario (b)

 

Expected Cash Flows

   $ 7.9      $ (.3   $ .4   

Accretable Difference

     2.2        (.1     .2   

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

     (1.1     (.3     .2   
(a) Declining Scenario – Reflects hypothetical changes that would decrease future cash flow expectations. For consumer loans we assume home price forecast decreases by ten percent and unemployment rate forecast increases by two percentage points; for commercial loans, we assume that collateral values decrease by ten percent.
(b) Improving Scenario – Reflects hypothetical changes that would increase future cash flow expectations. For consumer loans, we assume home price forecast increases by ten percent, unemployment rate forecast decreases by two percentage points and interest rate forecast increases by two percentage points; for commercial loans, we assume that collateral values increase by ten percent.

The impact of declining cash flows is primarily reflected as immediate impairment (allowance for loan losses). The impact of increased cash flows is first recognized as a reversal of the allowance with any additional cash flow increases reflected as an increase in accretable yield over the life of the loan.

NET UNFUNDED CREDIT COMMITMENTS

Net unfunded credit commitments are comprised of the following:

Table 13: Net Unfunded Credit Commitments

 

In millions   June 30
2013
    December 31
2012
 

Commercial and commercial real estate (a)

  $ 82,790      $ 78,703   

Home equity lines of credit

    19,325        19,814   

Credit card

    17,101        17,381   

Other

    4,926        4,694   

Total

  $ 124,142      $ 120,592   
(a) Less than 5% of total net unfunded credit commitments relate to commercial real estate at each date.

Commitments to extend credit represent arrangements to lend funds or provide liquidity subject to specified contractual conditions. Commercial commitments reported above exclude syndications, assignments and participations, primarily to financial institutions, totaling $23.5 billion at June 30, 2013 and $22.5 billion at December 31, 2012.

Unfunded liquidity facility commitments and standby bond purchase agreements totaled $701 million at June 30, 2013 and $732 million at December 31, 2012 and are included in the preceding table primarily within the Commercial and commercial real estate category.

In addition to the credit commitments set forth in the table above, our net outstanding standby letters of credit totaled $10.9 billion at June 30, 2013 and $11.5 billion at December 31, 2012. Standby letters of credit commit us to make payments on behalf of our customers if specified future events occur.

Information regarding our Allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit is included in Note 7 Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses and Unfunded Loan Commitments and Letters of Credit in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Report.

 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    17


Table of Contents

INVESTMENT SECURITIES

Table 14: Investment Securities

 

    June 30, 2013     December 31, 2012  
In millions  

Amortized

Cost

   

Fair

Value

   

Amortized

Cost

   

Fair

Value

 

Total securities available for sale (a)

  $ 47,176      $ 47,899      $ 49,447      $ 51,052   

Total securities held to maturity

    9,550        9,749        10,354        10,860   

Total securities

  $ 56,726      $ 57,648      $ 59,801      $ 61,912   
(a) Includes $297 million of both amortized cost and fair value of securities classified as corporate stocks and other at June 30, 2013. Comparably, at December 31, 2012, amortized cost and fair value of these corporate stocks and other was $367 million. The remainder of securities available for sale are debt securities.

The carrying amount of investment securities totaled $57.4 billion at June 30, 2013, which was made up of $47.9 billion of securities available for sale carried at fair value and $9.5 billion of securities held to maturity carried at amortized cost. Comparably, at December 31, 2012, the carrying value of investment securities totaled $61.4 billion of which $51.0 billion represented securities available for sale carried at fair value and $10.4 billion of securities held to maturity carried at amortized cost.

The decrease in the carrying amount of investment securities of $4.0 billion since December 31, 2012 resulted primarily from a decline in agency residential mortgage-backed securities due to principal payments partially offset by net purchase activity. Investment securities represented 19% of total assets at June 30, 2013 and 20% at December 31, 2012.

We evaluate our portfolio of investment securities in light of changing market conditions and other factors and, where appropriate, take steps to improve our overall positioning. We consider the portfolio to be well-diversified and of high quality. U.S. Treasury and government agencies, agency residential mortgage-backed and agency commercial mortgage-backed securities collectively represented 56% of the investment securities portfolio at June 30, 2013.

At June 30, 2013, the securities available for sale portfolio included a net unrealized gain of $.7 billion, which

represented the difference between fair value and amortized cost. The comparable balance at December 31, 2012 was $1.6 billion. The decrease in the net unrealized gain since December 31, 2012 resulted from an increase in market interest rates and widening asset spreads. The fair value of investment securities is impacted by interest rates, credit spreads, market volatility and liquidity conditions. The fair value of investment securities generally decreases when interest rates increase and vice versa. In addition, the fair value generally decreases when credit spreads widen and vice versa. Net unrealized gains and losses in the securities available for sale portfolio are included in Shareholders’ equity as Accumulated other comprehensive income or loss, net of tax, on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Additional information regarding our investment securities is included in Note 8 Investment Securities and Note 9 Fair Value in our Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Report.

Unrealized gains and losses on available for sale securities do not impact liquidity or risk-based capital under currently effective capital rules. However, reductions in the credit ratings of these securities could have an impact on the liquidity of the securities or the determination of risk-weighted assets, which could reduce our regulatory capital ratios under currently effective capital rules. In addition, the amount representing the credit-related portion of other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) on available for sale securities would reduce our earnings and regulatory capital ratios.

The weighted-average expected life of investment securities (excluding corporate stocks and other) was 4.5 years at June 30, 2013 and 4.0 years at December 31, 2012.

The duration of investment securities was 2.8 years at June 30, 2013. We estimate that, at June 30, 2013, the effective duration of investment securities was 2.9 years for an immediate 50 basis points parallel increase in interest rates and 2.6 years for an immediate 50 basis points parallel decrease in interest rates. Comparable amounts at December 31, 2012 were 2.3 years and 2.2 years, respectively.

 

 

18    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

The following table provides details regarding the vintage, current credit rating and FICO score of the underlying collateral at origination, where available, for residential mortgage-backed, commercial mortgage-backed and other asset-backed securities held in the available for sale and held to maturity portfolios:

Table 15: Vintage, Current Credit Rating and FICO Score for Asset-Backed Securities

 

     Agency      Non-agency          

As of June 30, 2013

Dollars in millions

  

Residential
Mortgage-

Backed
Securities

   

Commercial
Mortgage-

Backed
Securities

    

Residential
Mortgage-

Backed
Securities

    

Commercial
Mortgage-

Backed
Securities

    

Asset-

Backed
Securities (a)

 

Fair Value – Available for Sale

   $ 24,248      $ 595       $ 5,852       $ 3,679       $ 6,034   

Fair Value – Held to Maturity

     3,825        1,319                  2,231         1,100   

Total Fair Value

   $ 28,073      $ 1,914       $ 5,852       $ 5,910       $ 7,134   

% of Fair Value:

                   

By Vintage

                   

2013

     4          1      4     

2012

     18     1      1      12     

2011

     25     49         6     

2010

     24     11      1      5      2

2009

     9     19         2      1

2008

     2     3              1

2007

     5     2      25      11      2

2006

     1     4      20      19      6

2005 and earlier

     6     11      51      41      5

Not Available

     6              1               83

Total

     100     100      100      100      100

By Credit Rating (at June 30, 2013)

                   

Agency

     100     100             

AAA

            3      69      66

AA

            1      9      25

A

            1      10      1

BBB

            4      4     

BB

            11      2     

B

            7      1      1

Lower than B

            71           7

No rating

                      2      5         

Total

     100     100      100      100      100

By FICO Score (at origination)

                   

>720

            51          

<720 and >660

            36           7

<660

                    2

No FICO score

                      13               91

Total

                      100               100
(a) Available for sale asset-backed securities include $2 million of available for sale agency asset-backed securities.

We conduct a comprehensive security-level impairment assessment quarterly on all securities. For those securities in an unrealized loss position, we determine whether the loss represents OTTI. Our assessment considers the security structure, recent security collateral performance metrics, external credit ratings, failure of the issuer to make scheduled interest or principal payments, our judgment and expectations of future performance, and relevant independent industry research, analysis and forecasts.

We also consider the severity of the impairment and the length of time that the security has been impaired in our assessment. Results of the periodic assessment are reviewed by a cross-functional senior management team representing Asset & Liability

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    19


Table of Contents

Management, Finance and Market Risk Management. The senior management team considers the results of the assessments, as well as other factors, in determining whether the impairment is other-than-temporary.

For those debt securities where we do not intend to sell and believe we will not be required to sell the securities prior to expected recovery, we recognize the credit portion of OTTI charges in current earnings and the noncredit portion of OTTI is included in Net unrealized gains (losses) on OTTI securities on our Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income and in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

We recognized OTTI for the first six months of 2013 and 2012 as follows:

Table 16: Other-Than-Temporary Impairments

 

     Three months ended June 30      Six months ended June 30  
In millions    2013      2012      2013     2012  

Credit portion of OTTI losses (a)

              

Non-agency residential mortgage-backed

   $ 3       $ 31       $ 10      $ 63   

Asset-backed

     1         3         4        8   

Other debt

                               1   

Total credit portion of OTTI losses

     4         34         14        72   

Noncredit portion of OTTI losses (recoveries) (b)

     6         (2      (3     (24

Total OTTI losses

   $ 10       $ 32       $ 11      $ 48   
(a) Reduction of Noninterest income on our Consolidated Income Statement.
(b) Included in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, on our Consolidated Balance Sheet and in Net unrealized gains (losses) on OTTI securities on our Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income.

 

20    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes net unrealized gains and losses recorded on non-agency residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities and other asset-backed securities, which represent our most significant categories of securities not backed by the U.S. government or its agencies. A summary of all OTTI credit losses recognized for the first six months of 2013 by investment type is included in Note 8 Investment Securities in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Report.

Table 17: Net Unrealized Gains and Losses on Non-Agency Securities

 

   

Residential Mortgage-

Backed Securities

   

Commercial Mortgage-

Backed Securities

   

Asset-Backed

Securities (a)

 

As of June 30, 2013

In millions

  Fair Value     Net Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
    Fair Value     Net Unrealized
Gain
    Fair Value     Net Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
 

Available for Sale Securities (Non-Agency)

                 

Credit Rating Analysis

                 

AAA

  $ 159      $ (8   $ 2,031      $ 43      $ 3,814      $ 12   

Other Investment Grade (AA, A, BBB)

    334        25        1,170        64        1,609        13   

Total Investment Grade

    493        17        3,201        107        5,423        25   

BB

    671        (66     139        5        4       

B

    393        (13     57        3        46       

Lower than B

    4,181        92                        534        (15

Total Sub-Investment Grade

    5,245        13        196        8        584        (15

Total No Rating

    114        6        282        4        25        (12

Total

  $ 5,852      $ 36      $ 3,679      $ 119      $ 6,032      $ (2

OTTI Analysis

                 

Investment Grade:

                 

OTTI has been recognized

                 

No OTTI recognized to date

  $ 493      $ 17      $ 3,201      $ 107      $ 5,423      $ 25   

Total Investment Grade

    493        17        3,201        107        5,423        25   

Sub-Investment Grade:

                 

OTTI has been recognized

    3,490        (82           551        (15

No OTTI recognized to date

    1,755        95        196        8        33           

Total Sub-Investment Grade

    5,245        13        196        8        584        (15

No Rating:

                 

OTTI has been recognized

    74        2              25        (12

No OTTI recognized to date

    40        4        282        4                   

Total No Rating

    114        6        282        4        25        (12

Total

  $ 5,852      $ 36      $ 3,679      $ 119      $ 6,032      $ (2

Securities Held to Maturity (Non-Agency)

                 

Credit Rating Analysis

                 

AAA

        $ 2,015      $ 30      $ 857      $ (1

Other Investment Grade (AA, A, BBB)

                    216        8        233        1   

Total Investment Grade

                    2,231        38        1,090           

BB

                10       

B

                 

Lower than B

                                               

Total Sub-Investment Grade

                                    10           

Total No Rating

                                               

Total

                  $ 2,231      $ 38      $ 1,100      $   
(a) Excludes $2 million of available for sale agency asset-backed securities.

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    21


Table of Contents

Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities

At June 30, 2013, our residential mortgage-backed securities portfolio was comprised of $28.1 billion fair value of U.S. government agency-backed securities and $5.9 billion fair value of non-agency (private issuer) securities. The agency securities are generally collateralized by 1-4 family, conforming, fixed-rate residential mortgages. The non-agency securities are also generally collateralized by 1-4 family residential mortgages. The mortgage loans underlying the non-agency securities are generally non-conforming (i.e., original balances in excess of the amount qualifying for agency securities) and predominately have interest rates that are fixed for a period of time, after which the rate adjusts to a floating rate based upon a contractual spread that is indexed to a market rate (i.e., a “hybrid ARM”), or interest rates that are fixed for the term of the loan.

Substantially all of the non-agency securities are senior tranches in the securitization structure and at origination had credit protection in the form of credit enhancement, over-collateralization and/or excess spread accounts.

During the first six months of 2013, we recorded OTTI credit losses of $10 million on non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities. All of the losses were associated with securities rated below investment grade. As of June 30, 2013, the net unrealized loss recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income for non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities for which we have recorded an OTTI credit loss totaled $80 million and the related securities had a fair value of $3.6 billion.

The fair value of sub-investment grade investment securities for which we have not recorded an OTTI credit loss as of June 30, 2013 totaled $1.8 billion, with unrealized net gains of $95 million. Based on the results of our security-level assessments, we anticipate recovering the cost basis of these securities.

Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities

The fair value of the non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities portfolio was $5.9 billion at June 30, 2013 and consisted of fixed-rate, private-issuer securities collateralized by non-residential properties, primarily retail properties, office buildings and multi-family housing. The agency commercial mortgage-backed securities portfolio had a fair value of $1.9 billion at June 30, 2013 consisting of multi-family housing. Substantially all of the securities are the most senior tranches in the subordination structure.

There were no OTTI credit losses on commercial mortgage-backed securities during the first six months of 2013.

Asset-Backed Securities

The fair value of the asset-backed securities portfolio was $7.1 billion at June 30, 2013. The portfolio consisted of fixed-rate

and floating-rate securities collateralized by various consumer credit products, primarily student loans and residential mortgage loans, as well as securities backed by corporate debt. Substantially all of the securities are senior tranches in the securitization structure and have credit protection in the form of credit enhancement, over-collateralization and/or excess spread accounts. Substantially all of the student loans in the securitizations are guaranteed by an agency of the U.S. government.

We recorded OTTI credit losses of $4 million on asset-backed securities during the first six months of 2013. All of the securities are collateralized by first and second lien residential mortgage loans and are rated below investment grade. As of June 30, 2013, the net unrealized loss recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income for asset-backed securities for which we have recorded an OTTI credit loss totaled $27 million and the related securities had a fair value of $576 million.

For the sub-investment grade investment securities for which we have not recorded an OTTI loss through June 30, 2013, the fair value was $43 million, with no unrealized net losses recorded. Based on the results of our security-level assessments, we anticipate recovering the cost basis of these securities.

Note 8 Investment Securities in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Report provides additional information on OTTI losses and further detail regarding our process for assessing OTTI.

If current housing and economic conditions were to deteriorate from current levels, and if market volatility and illiquidity were to deteriorate from current levels, or if market interest rates were to increase or credit spreads were to widen appreciably, the valuation of our investment securities portfolio could be adversely affected and we could incur additional OTTI credit losses that would impact our Consolidated Income Statement.

LOANS HELD FOR SALE

Table 18: Loans Held For Sale

 

In millions  

June 30

2013

    December 31
2012
 

Commercial mortgages at fair value

  $ 635      $ 772   

Commercial mortgages at lower of cost or market

    437        620   

Total commercial mortgages

    1,072        1,392   

Residential mortgages at fair value

    2,246        2,096   

Residential mortgages at lower of cost or market

    107        124   

Total residential mortgages

    2,353        2,220   

Other

    389        81   

Total

  $ 3,814      $ 3,693   
 

 

22    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

We stopped originating certain commercial mortgage loans held for sale designated at fair value and continue pursuing opportunities to reduce these positions at appropriate prices. At June 30, 2013, the balance relating to these loans was $635 million, compared to $772 million at December 31, 2012.

We sold $1.4 billion of commercial mortgages held for sale carried at lower of cost or market during the first six months of 2013 compared to $.9 billion during the first six months of 2012. All of these loan sales were to government agencies. Gains on sale, net of hedges, were $43 million during the first six months of 2013, including $20 million in the second quarter. Comparable amounts for 2012 were $15 million and $18 million, respectively.

Residential mortgage loan origination volume was $8.9 billion in the first six months of 2013 compared to $7.0 billion for the first six months of 2012. Substantially all such loans were originated under agency or Federal Housing Administration (FHA) standards. We sold $8.0 billion of loans and recognized related gains of $362 million during the first six months of 2013, of which $190 million occurred in the second quarter. The comparable amounts for the first six months of 2012 were $6.4 billion and $318 million, respectively, including $177 million in the second quarter.

Interest income on loans held for sale was $85 million in the first six months of 2013, including $32 million in the second quarter. Comparable amounts for 2012 were $95 million and $45 million, respectively. These amounts are included in Other interest income on our Consolidated Income Statement.

Additional information regarding our loan sale and servicing activities is included in Note 3 Loan Sales and Servicing Activities and Variable Interest Entities and Note 9 Fair Value in our Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Report.

GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Goodwill and other intangible assets totaled $11.2 billion at June 30, 2013 and $10.9 billion at December 31, 2012. The increase of $.3 billion was primarily due to mortgage and other loan servicing rights. See additional information regarding our goodwill and intangible assets in Note 10 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets included in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Report.

FUNDING AND CAPITAL SOURCES

Table 19: Details Of Funding Sources

 

In millions   

June 30

2013

     December 31
2012
 

Deposits

       

Money market

   $ 103,480       $ 102,706   

Demand

     72,080         73,995   

Retail certificates of deposit

     22,265         23,837   

Savings

     11,085         10,350   

Time deposits in foreign offices and other time

     3,369         2,254   

Total deposits

     212,279         213,142   

Borrowed funds

       

Federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements

     4,303         3,327   

Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings

     8,481         9,437   

Bank notes and senior debt

     11,177         10,429   

Subordinated debt

     7,113         7,299   

Commercial paper

     6,400         8,453   

Other

     2,390         1,962   

Total borrowed funds

     39,864         40,907   

Total funding sources

   $ 252,143       $ 254,049   

See the Liquidity Risk Management portion of the Risk Management section of this Financial Review and Note 20 Subsequent Events in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements of this Report for additional information regarding our 2013 capital and liquidity activities.

Total funding sources decreased $1.9 billion at June 30, 2013 compared with December 31, 2012.

Total deposits decreased $.9 billion at June 30, 2013 compared with December 31, 2012 due to decreases in demand deposits and retail certificates of deposit, partially offset by increases in time deposits in foreign offices and other time, money market and savings deposits. Interest-bearing deposits represented 69% of total deposits at June 30, 2013 compared to 67% at December 31, 2012. Total borrowed funds decreased $1.0 billion since December 31, 2012 as a result of declines in commercial paper and FHLB borrowings, partially offset by higher federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements and bank notes and senior debt.

 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    23


Table of Contents

CAPITAL

Table 20: Shareholders’ Equity

 

In millions    June 30
2013
    December 31
2012
 

Shareholders’ equity

      

Preferred stock (a)

      

Common stock

   $ 2,693      $ 2,690   

Capital surplus – preferred stock

     3,939        3,590   

Capital surplus – common stock and other

     12,234        12,193   

Retained earnings

     21,828        20,265   

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

     45        834   

Common stock held in treasury at cost

     (453     (569

Total shareholders’ equity

   $ 40,286      $ 39,003   
(a) Par value less than $.5 million at each date.

We manage our funding and capital positions by making adjustments to our balance sheet size and composition, issuing debt, equity or other capital instruments, executing treasury stock transactions and capital redemptions, managing dividend policies and retaining earnings.

Total shareholders’ equity increased $1.3 billion, to $40.3 billion at June 30, 2013, compared with December 31, 2012 primarily reflecting an increase in retained earnings of $1.6 billion (driven by net income of $2.1 billion and the impact of $.6 billion of dividends declared) and an increase of $.3

billion in capital surplus-preferred stock due to the net issuances of preferred stock. These increases were partially offset by the decline of accumulated other comprehensive income of $.8 billion primarily due to the impact of an increase in market interest rates and widening asset spreads on securities available for sale and derivatives that are part of cash flow hedging strategies. Common shares outstanding were 531 million at June 30, 2013 and 528 million at December 31, 2012.

See the Liquidity Risk Management portion of the Risk Management section of this Financial Review for additional information regarding our April 2013 redemption of our Series L Preferred Stock and our May 2013 issuance of our Series R Preferred Stock.

Our current common stock repurchase program permits us to purchase up to 25 million shares of PNC common stock on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. This program will remain in effect until fully utilized or until modified, superseded or terminated. The extent and timing of share repurchases under this program will depend on a number of factors including, among others, market and general economic conditions, economic and regulatory capital considerations, alternative uses of capital and the potential impact on our credit ratings. We do not expect to repurchase any shares under this program in 2013. We did not include any such share repurchases in our 2013 capital plan submitted to the Federal Reserve, primarily as a result of PNC’s 2012 acquisition of RBC Bank (USA) and expansion into Southeastern markets.

 

 

24    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

Table 21: Basel I Risk-Based Capital

 

Dollars in millions    June 30
2013
    December 31
2012
 

Capital components

      

Shareholders’ equity

      

Common

   $ 36,347      $ 35,413   

Preferred

     3,939        3,590   

Trust preferred capital securities

     216        331   

Noncontrolling interests

     985        1,354   

Goodwill and other intangible assets

     (9,727     (9,798

Eligible deferred income taxes on goodwill and other intangible assets

     346        354   

Pension and other postretirement benefit plan adjustments

     743        777   

Net unrealized securities (gains)/losses, after-tax

     (502     (1,052

Net unrealized (gains)/losses on cash flow hedge derivatives, after-tax

     (332     (578

Other

     (207     (165

Tier 1 risk-based capital

     31,808        30,226   

Subordinated debt

     5,081        4,735   

Eligible allowance for credit losses

     3,318        3,276   

Total risk-based capital

   $ 40,207      $ 38,237   

Tier 1 common capital

      

Tier 1 risk-based capital

   $ 31,808      $ 30,226   

Preferred equity

     (3,939     (3,590

Trust preferred capital securities

     (216     (331

Noncontrolling interests

     (985     (1,354

Tier 1 common capital

   $ 26,668      $ 24,951   

Assets

      

Risk-weighted assets, including off-balance sheet instruments and market risk equivalent assets

   $ 264,750      $ 260,847   

Adjusted average total assets

     291,605        291,426   

Basel I capital ratios

      

Tier 1 common

     10.1     9.6

Tier 1 risk-based

     12.0        11.6   

Total risk-based

     15.2        14.7   

Leverage

     10.9        10.4   

Federal banking regulators have stated that they expect all bank holding companies to have a level and composition of Tier 1 capital well in excess of the 4% Basel I regulatory minimum, and they have required the largest U.S. bank holding companies, including PNC, to have a capital buffer sufficient to withstand losses and allow them to meet the credit needs of their customers through estimated stress scenarios. They have also stated their view that common equity should be the dominant form of Tier 1 capital. As a result, regulators are now emphasizing the Tier 1 common capital ratio in their evaluation of bank holding company capital levels. We seek to manage our capital consistent with these regulatory principles, and believe that our June 30, 2013 capital levels were aligned with them.

Dodd-Frank requires the Federal Reserve to establish capital requirements that would, among other things, eliminate the Tier 1 treatment of trust preferred securities for bank holding companies with $15 billion or more in assets following a phase-in period that begins in 2014. Accordingly, PNC has redeemed trust preferred securities and will consider redeeming others on or after their first call date, based on such considerations as dividend rates, future capital requirements, capital market conditions and other factors. See Note 14 Capital Securities of Subsidiary Trusts and Perpetual Trust Securities in Item 8 of our 2012 Form 10-K and Note 11 Capital Securities of Subsidiary Trusts and Perpetual Trust Securities and Note 20 Subsequent Events in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in this Report for additional discussion of our trust preferred securities and completed or upcoming redemptions.

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    25


Table of Contents

Our Basel I Tier 1 common capital ratio was 10.1% at June 30, 2013, compared with 9.6% at December 31, 2012. Our Basel I Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio increased 40 basis points to 12.0% at June 30, 2013 from 11.6% at December 31, 2012. Our Basel I total risk-based capital ratio increased 50 basis points to 15.2% at June 30, 2013 from 14.7% at December 31, 2012. Basel I capital ratios increased in all comparisons primarily due to growth in retained earnings. The net issuance of preferred stock during the six months ended June 30, 2013 partially offset by the redemption of trust preferred securities favorably impacted the June 30, 2013 Basel I Tier 1 risk-based and Basel I total risk-based capital ratios. Basel I risk-weighted assets increased $3.9 billion to $264.8 billion at June 30, 2013.

At June 30, 2013, PNC and PNC Bank, National Association (PNC Bank, N.A.), our domestic bank subsidiary, were both considered “well capitalized” based on U.S. regulatory capital ratio requirements under Basel I. To qualify as “well-capitalized”, regulators currently require bank holding companies and banks to maintain Basel I capital ratios of at least 6% for Tier 1 risk-based, 10% for total risk-based, and 5% for leverage. We believe PNC and PNC Bank, N.A. will continue to meet these requirements during the remainder of 2013.

PNC and PNC Bank, N.A. entered the “parallel run” qualification phase under the Basel II capital framework on January 1, 2013. The Basel II framework, which was adopted by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in 2004, seeks to provide more risk-sensitive regulatory capital calculations and promote enhanced risk management practices among large, internationally active banking organizations. The U.S. banking agencies initially adopted rules to implement the Basel II capital framework in 2004. In July 2013, the U.S. banking agencies adopted final rules (referred to as the advanced approaches) that modify the Basel II risk-weighting framework. See Recent Market and Industry Developments in the Executive Summary section of this Financial Review and Item 1 Business – Supervision and Regulation and Item 1A Risk Factors in our 2012 Form 10-K. Prior to fully implementing the advanced approaches established by these rules to calculate risk-weighted assets, PNC and PNC Bank, N.A. must successfully complete a “parallel run” qualification phase. This phase must last at least four consecutive quarters, although, consistent with the experience of other U.S. banks, we currently anticipate a multi-year parallel run period.

We provide information below regarding PNC’s pro forma fully phased-in Basel III Tier 1 common capital ratio using PNC’s estimated Basel III advanced approaches risk-weighted assets and how it differs from the Basel I Tier 1 common capital ratio. The Basel III ratio will replace the current Basel I ratio for this regulatory metric when PNC exits the parallel run qualification phase.

The Federal Reserve announced final rules implementing Basel III on July 2, 2013. PNC continues its evaluation of these rules. Pending completion of that evaluation, we have estimated our Basel III capital information set forth below based on our understanding of the prior U.S. Basel III rule proposals issued in 2012.

Table 22: Estimated Pro forma Basel III Tier 1 Common Capital Ratio

 

Dollars in millions    June 30
2013
    December 31
2012
 

Basel I Tier 1 common capital

   $ 26,668      $ 24,951   

Less regulatory capital adjustments:

      

Basel III quantitative limits

     (2,224     (2,330

Accumulated other comprehensive income (a)

     (241     276   

All other adjustments

     (283     (396

Estimated Basel III Tier 1 common capital

   $ 23,920      $ 22,501   

Estimated Basel III risk-weighted assets

     290,838        301,006   

Pro forma Basel III Tier 1 common capital ratio

     8.2     7.5
(a) Represents net adjustments related to accumulated other comprehensive income for available for sale securities and pension and other postretirement benefit plans.

Tier 1 common capital as defined under the Basel III rules differs materially from Basel I. For example, under Basel III, significant common stock investments in unconsolidated financial institutions, mortgage servicing rights and deferred tax assets must be deducted from capital to the extent they individually exceed 10%, or in the aggregate exceed 15%, of the institution’s adjusted Tier 1 common capital. Also, Basel I regulatory capital excludes certain other comprehensive income related to both available for sale securities and pension and other postretirement plans, whereas under Basel III these items are a component of PNC’s capital. Basel III risk-weighted assets were estimated under the advanced approaches included in the Basel III rules and application of Basel II.5, and reflect credit, market and operational risk.

PNC utilizes this capital ratio estimate to assess its Basel III capital position (without the benefit of phase-ins), including comparison to similar estimates made by other financial institutions. This Basel III capital estimate is likely to be impacted by PNC’s ongoing analysis of the recently issued Basel III final rules and the ongoing evolution, validation and regulatory approval of PNC’s models integral to the calculation of advanced approaches risk-weighted assets.

The access to and cost of funding for new business initiatives, the ability to undertake new business initiatives including acquisitions, the ability to engage in expanded business activities, the ability to pay dividends or repurchase shares or other capital instruments, the level of deposit insurance costs, and the level and nature of regulatory oversight depend, in large part, on a financial institution’s capital strength.

 

 

26    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

We provide additional information regarding enhanced capital requirements and some of their potential impacts on PNC in Item 1A Risk Factors included in our 2012 Form 10-K.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS AND VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

We engage in a variety of activities that involve unconsolidated entities or that are otherwise not reflected in our Consolidated Balance Sheet that are generally referred to as “off-balance sheet arrangements.” Additional information on these types of activities is included in our 2012 Form 10-K and in the following sections of this Report:

   

Commitments, including contractual obligations and other commitments, included within the Risk Management section of this Financial Review,

   

Note 3 Loan Sale and Servicing Activities and Variable Interest Entities in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements,

   

Note 11 Capital Securities of Subsidiary Trusts and Perpetual Trust Securities in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements, and

   

Note 18 Commitments and Guarantees in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements.

PNC consolidates variable interest entities (VIEs) when we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is determined to be the party that meets both of the following criteria: (i) has the power to make decisions that most significantly affect the economic performance of the VIE and (ii) has the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that in either case could potentially be significant to the VIE.

A summary of VIEs, including those that we have consolidated and those in which we hold variable interests but have not consolidated into our financial statements, as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 is included in Note 3 of this Report.

TRUST PREFERRED SECURITIES AND REIT PREFERRED SECURITIES

We are subject to certain restrictions, including restrictions on dividend payments, in connection with $265 million in principal amount of outstanding junior subordinated debentures associated with $257 million of trust preferred securities that were issued by various subsidiary statutory trusts (both amounts as of June 30, 2013). Generally, if there is (i) an event of default under the debentures, (ii) PNC elects to defer interest on the debentures, (iii) PNC exercises its right to defer payments on the related trust preferred securities issued by the statutory trusts or (iv) there is a default under PNC’s guarantee of such payment obligations, as specified in the applicable governing documents, then PNC would be subject during the period of such default or deferral to restrictions on dividends and other provisions protecting the status of the debenture holders similar to or in some ways more restrictive than those potentially imposed under the Exchange Agreement with PNC Preferred Funding Trust II, as described in Note 14 Capital Securities of Subsidiary Trusts and Perpetual Trust Securities in our 2012 Form 10-K. See the Liquidity Risk Management portion of the Risk Management section of this Financial Review for additional information regarding our first quarter 2013 redemption of the REIT Preferred Securities issued by PNC Preferred Funding Trust III and additional discussion of redemptions of trust preferred securities.

 

 

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

In addition to the following, see Note 9 Fair Value in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Report and in our 2012 Form 10-K for further information regarding fair value.

The following table summarizes the assets and liabilities measured at fair value at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, and the portions of such assets and liabilities that are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.

Table 23: Fair Value Measurements – Summary

 

     June 30, 2013           December 31, 2012  
In millions   

Total Fair

Value

     Level 3          

Total Fair

Value

     Level 3  

Total assets

   $ 64,026       $ 10,812           $ 68,352       $ 10,988   

Total assets at fair value as a percentage of consolidated assets

     21             22     

Level 3 assets as a percentage of total assets at fair value

        17             16

Level 3 assets as a percentage of consolidated assets

              4                   4

Total liabilities

   $ 6,457       $ 578           $ 7,356       $ 376   

Total liabilities at fair value as a percentage of consolidated liabilities

     2             3     

Level 3 liabilities as a percentage of total liabilities at fair value

        9             5

Level 3 liabilities as a percentage of consolidated liabilities

              <1                   <1

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    27


Table of Contents

The majority of assets recorded at fair value are included in the securities available for sale portfolio. The majority of Level 3 assets represent non-agency residential mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities in the securities available for sale portfolio for which there was limited market activity.

An instrument’s categorization within the hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. PNC reviews and updates fair value hierarchy classifications quarterly. Changes from one quarter to the next related to the observability of inputs to a fair value measurement may result in a reclassification (transfer) of assets or liabilities between hierarchy levels. PNC’s policy is to recognize transfers in and transfers out as of the end of the reporting period. During the first six months of 2013, there were transfers of residential mortgage loans held for sale and loans from Level 2 to Level 3 of $6 million and $11 million, respectively, as a result of reduced market activity in the

nonperforming residential mortgage sales market which reduced the observability of valuation inputs. Also during 2013, there were transfers out of Level 3 residential mortgage loans held for sale and loans of $7 million and $16 million, respectively, primarily due to the transfer of residential mortgage loans held for sale and loans to OREO. In addition, there was approximately $46 million of Level 3 residential mortgage loans held for sale reclassified to Level 3 loans during the first six months of 2013 due to the loans being reclassified from held for sale loans to held in portfolio loans. This amount was included in Transfers out of Level 3 residential mortgage loans held for sale and Transfers into Level 3 loans within Table 90: Reconciliation of Level 3 Assets and Liabilities. In the comparable period of 2012, there were transfers of assets and liabilities from Level 2 to Level 3 of $460 million consisting of mortgage-backed available for sale securities transferred as a result of a ratings downgrade which reduced the observability of valuation inputs.

 

 

EUROPEAN EXPOSURE

Table 24: Summary of European Exposure

June 30, 2013

     Direct Exposure              Total
Exposure
 
     Funded      Unfunded                   
In millions    Loans      Leases      Securities      Total      Other (a)      Total Direct
Exposure
     Total Indirect
Exposure
    

Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal and Spain (GIIPS)

   $ 84       $ 124          $ 208       $ 3       $ 211       $ 36       $ 247   

Belgium and France

        72            72         35         107         919         1,026   

United Kingdom

     747         71            818         332         1,150         612         1,762   

Europe – Other (b)

     107         532       $ 324         963         49         1,012         703         1,715   

Total Europe (c)

   $ 938       $ 799       $ 324       $ 2,061       $ 419       $ 2,480       $ 2,270       $ 4,750   

December 31, 2012

     Direct Exposure                  
     Funded      Unfunded                   
In millions    Loans      Leases      Securities      Total      Other (a)      Total Direct
Exposure
     Total Indirect
Exposure
     Total
Exposure
 

Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal and Spain (GIIPS)

   $ 85       $ 122          $ 207       $ 3       $ 210       $ 31       $ 241   

Belgium and France

        73       $ 30         103         35         138         1,083         1,221   

United Kingdom

     698         32            730         449         1,179         525         1,704   

Europe – Other (b)

     113         529         168         810         63         873         838         1,711   

Total Europe (c)

   $ 896       $ 756       $ 198       $ 1,850       $ 550       $ 2,400       $ 2,477       $ 4,877   
(a) Includes unfunded commitments, guarantees, standby letters of credit and sold protection credit derivatives.
(b) Europe – Other primarily consists of Denmark, Germany, Netherlands, Sweden and Switzerland. For the period ended June 30, 2013, Europe – Other also included Norway.
(c) Included within Europe – Other is funded direct exposure of $68 million and $168 million consisting of AAA-rated sovereign debt securities at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. There was no other direct or indirect exposure to European sovereigns as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

European entities are defined as supranational, sovereign, financial institutions and non-financial entities within the countries that comprise the European Union, European Union candidate countries and other European countries. Foreign exposure underwriting and approvals are centralized. PNC currently underwrites new European activities if the credit is generally associated with activities of its United States commercial customers, and, in the case of PNC Business Credit’s United Kingdom operations, loans with moderate risk as they are predominantly well secured by short-term assets or, in limited situations, the borrower’s appraised value of certain fixed assets. Formerly, PNC had underwritten foreign infrastructure leases supported by highly rated bank letters of credit and other collateral, U.S. Treasury securities and the underlying assets of the lease. Country exposures are monitored and reported on a regular basis. We actively monitor sovereign risk, banking system health, and market conditions and adjust limits as appropriate. We rely on information from internal and external sources, including international financial institutions, economists and analysts, industry trade organizations, rating agencies, econometric data analytical service providers and geopolitical news analysis services.

 

28    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

Among the regions and nations that PNC monitors, we have identified seven countries for which we are more closely monitoring their economic and financial situation. The basis for the increased monitoring includes, but is not limited to, sovereign debt burden, near term financing risk, political instability, GDP trends, balance of payments, market confidence, banking system distress and/or holdings of stressed sovereign debt. The countries identified are: Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal, Spain (collectively “GIIPS”), Belgium and France.

Direct exposure primarily consists of loans, leases, securities, derivatives, letters of credit and unfunded contractual commitments with European entities. As of June, 30, 2013, the $2.1 billion of funded direct exposure (.68% of PNC’s total assets) primarily represented $655 million for cross-border leases in support of national infrastructure, which were supported by letters of credit and other collateral having trigger mechanisms that require replacement or collateral in the form of cash or United States Treasury or government securities, $598 million for United Kingdom foreign office loans and $68 million of securities issued by AAA-rated sovereigns. The comparable level of direct exposure outstanding at December 31, 2012 was $1.9 billion (.61% of PNC’s total assets), which primarily included $645 million for cross-border leases in support of national infrastructure, $600 million for United Kingdom foreign office loans and $168 million of securities issued by AAA-rated sovereigns.

The $419 million of unfunded direct exposure as of June 30, 2013 was largely comprised of $332 million for unfunded contractual commitments primarily for United Kingdom local office commitments to PNC Business Credit corporate customers on a secured basis or activities supporting our domestic customers export activities through the confirmation of trade letters of credit. Comparably, the $550 million of unfunded direct exposure as of December 31, 2012 was largely comprised of $449 million for unfunded contractual commitments primarily for United Kingdom local office commitments to PNC Business Credit corporate customers on a secured basis or activities supporting our domestic customers export activities through the confirmation of trade letters of credit.

We also track European financial exposures where our clients, primarily U.S. entities, appoint PNC as a letter of credit

issuing bank and we elect to assume the joint probability of default risk. As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, PNC had $2.3 billion and $2.5 billion, respectively, of indirect exposure. For PNC to incur a loss in these indirect exposures, both the obligor and the financial counterparty participating bank would need to default. PNC assesses both the corporate customers and the participating banks for counterparty risk and where PNC has found that a participating bank exposes PNC to unacceptable risk, PNC will reject the participating bank as an acceptable counterparty and will ask the corporate customer to find an acceptable participating bank.

Direct and indirect exposure to entities in the GIIPS countries totaled $247 million as of June 30, 2013, of which $124 million was direct exposure for cross-border leases within Portugal, $67 million represented direct exposure for loans outstanding within Ireland and $36 million represented indirect exposure for letters of credit with strong underlying obligors, primarily U.S. entities, with participating banks in Ireland, Italy and Spain. The comparable amounts as of December 31, 2012 were total direct and indirect exposure of $241 million, consisting of $122 million of direct exposure for cross-border leases within Portugal, $67 million represented direct exposure for loans outstanding within Ireland and $31 million represented indirect exposure for letters of credit with strong underlying obligors, primarily U.S. entities, with participating banks in Ireland, Italy and Spain.

Direct and indirect exposure to entities in Belgium and France totaled $1.0 billion as of June 30, 2013. Direct exposure of $107 million primarily consisted of $70 million for cross-border leases within Belgium and $35 million for unfunded contractual commitments in France. Indirect exposure was $919 million for letters of credit with strong underlying obligors, primarily U.S. entities, with creditworthy participant banks in France and Belgium. The comparable amounts as of December 31, 2012 were total direct and indirect exposure of $1.2 billion of which there was $138 million of direct exposure primarily consisting of $69 million for cross-border leases within Belgium, $35 million for unfunded contractual commitments in France and $30 million of covered bonds issued by a financial institution in France. Indirect exposure at December 31, 2012 was $1.1 billion for letters of credit with strong underlying obligors and creditworthy participant banks in France and Belgium.

 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    29


Table of Contents

BUSINESS SEGMENTS REVIEW

We have six reportable business segments:

   

Retail Banking

   

Corporate & Institutional Banking

   

Asset Management Group

   

Residential Mortgage Banking

   

BlackRock

   

Non-Strategic Assets Portfolio

Business segment results, including inter-segment revenues, and a description of each business are included in Note 19 Segment Reporting included in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Report. Certain amounts included in this Financial Review differ from those amounts shown in Note 19 primarily due to the presentation in this Financial Review of business net interest revenue on a taxable-equivalent basis.

Results of individual businesses are presented based on our internal management reporting practices. There is no comprehensive, authoritative body of guidance for management accounting equivalent to GAAP; therefore, the financial results of our individual businesses are not necessarily comparable with similar information for any other company. We periodically refine our internal methodologies as management reporting practices are enhanced. To the extent practicable, retrospective application of new methodologies is made to prior period reportable business segment results and disclosures to create comparability to the current period presentation to reflect any such refinements.

Financial results are presented, to the extent practicable, as if each business operated on a stand-alone basis. Additionally, we have aggregated the results for corporate support functions within “Other” for financial reporting purposes.

Assets receive a funding charge and liabilities and capital receive a funding credit based on a transfer pricing

methodology that incorporates product maturities, duration and other factors. A portion of capital is intended to cover unexpected losses and is assigned to our business segments using our risk-based economic capital model, including consideration of the goodwill and other intangible assets at those business segments, as well as the diversification of risk among the business segments.

We have allocated the allowances for loan and lease losses and for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit based on our assessment of risk in each business segment’s loan portfolio. Key reserve assumptions and estimation processes react to and are influenced by observed changes in loan portfolio performance experience, the financial strength of the borrower, and economic conditions. Key reserve assumptions are periodically updated. Our allocation of the costs incurred by operations and other shared support areas not directly aligned with the businesses is primarily based on the use of services.

Total business segment financial results differ from total consolidated net income. The impact of these differences is reflected in the “Other” category. “Other” for purposes of this Business Segments Review and the Business Segment Highlights in the Executive Summary section of this Financial Review includes residual activities that do not meet the criteria for disclosure as a separate reportable business, such as gains or losses related to BlackRock transactions, integration costs, asset and liability management activities including net securities gains or losses, other-than-temporary impairment of investment securities and certain trading activities, exited businesses, private equity investments, intercompany eliminations, most corporate overhead, tax adjustments that are not allocated to business segments and differences between business segment performance reporting and financial statement reporting (GAAP), including the presentation of net income attributable to noncontrolling interests as the segments’ results exclude their portion of net income attributable to noncontrolling interests.

 

 

30    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

RETAIL BANKING

(Unaudited)

Table 25: Retail Banking Table

 

Six months ended June 30

Dollars in millions, except as noted

   2013     2012  

Income Statement

      

Net interest income

   $ 2,061      $ 2,159   

Noninterest income

      

Service charges on deposits

     270        258   

Brokerage

     110        94   

Consumer services

     445        404   

Other

     151        72   

Total noninterest income

     976        828   

Total revenue

     3,037        2,987   

Provision for credit losses

     310        300   

Noninterest expense

     2,287        2,240   

Pretax earnings

     440        447   

Income taxes

     162        164   

Earnings

   $ 278      $ 283   

Average Balance Sheet

      

Loans

      

Consumer

      

Home equity

   $ 29,063      $ 27,499   

Indirect auto

     7,161        4,735   

Indirect other

     969        1,242   

Education

     8,101        9,270   

Credit cards

     4,085        4,001   

Other

     2,141        2,222   

Total consumer

     51,520        48,969   

Commercial and commercial real estate

     11,318        11,083   

Floor plan

     2,031        1,733   

Residential mortgage

     788        1,002   

Total loans

     65,657        62,787   

Goodwill and other intangible assets

     6,138        6,058   

Other assets

     2,522        2,575   

Total assets

   $ 74,317      $ 71,420   

Deposits

      

Noninterest-bearing demand

   $ 20,967      $ 19,572   

Interest-bearing demand

     31,595        26,986   

Money market

     48,469        45,436   

Total transaction deposits

     101,031        91,994   

Savings

     10,768        9,489   

Certificates of deposit

     22,251        27,309   

Total deposits

     134,050        128,792   

Other liabilities

     308        410   

Capital

     8,967        8,391   

Total liabilities and equity

   $ 143,325      $ 137,593   

Performance Ratios

      

Return on average capital

     6     7

Return on average assets

     .75        .80   

Noninterest income to total revenue

     32        28   

Efficiency

     75        75   

Other Information (a)

      

Credit-related statistics:

      

Commercial nonperforming assets

   $ 222      $ 275   

Consumer nonperforming assets

     1,068        685   

Total nonperforming assets (b)

   $ 1,290      $ 960   

Purchased impaired loans (c)

   $ 750      $ 886   

Commercial lending net charge-offs

   $ 59      $ 66   

Credit card lending net charge-offs

     84        99   

Consumer lending (excluding credit card) net charge-offs

     259        213   

Total net charge-offs

   $ 402      $ 378   

Commercial lending annualized net charge-off ratio

     .89     1.04

Credit card lending annualized net charge-off ratio

     4.15     4.98

Consumer lending (excluding credit card) annualized net charge-off ratio (h)

     1.08     .93

Total annualized net charge-off ratio (h)

     1.23     1.21

 

At June 30

Dollars in millions, except as noted

   2013      2012  

Other Information (Continued) (a)

       

Home equity portfolio credit statistics: (d)

       

% of first lien positions at origination (e)

     50      39

Weighted-average loan-to-value ratios (LTVs) (e) (f)

     85      78

Weighted-average updated FICO scores (g)

     745         742   

Annualized net charge-off ratio (h)

     1.39      1.01

Delinquency data: (i)

       

Loans 30 – 59 days past due

     .20      .32

Loans 60 – 89 days past due

     .08      .18

Total accruing loans past due

     .28      .50

Nonperforming loans

     3.12      1.98

Other statistics:

       

ATMs

     7,335         7,206   

Branches (j)

     2,780         2,888   

Full service brokerage offices

     37         40   

Brokerage account assets (billions)

   $ 39       $ 36   

Customer-related statistics: (in thousands)

       

Retail Banking checking relationships

     6,589         6,349   

Retail online banking active customers

     4,271         3,953   

Retail online bill payment active customers

     1,270         1,189   
(a) Presented as of June 30, except for net charge-offs and annualized net charge-off ratios, which are for the six months ended.
(b) Includes nonperforming loans of $1.2 billion at June 30, 2013 and $0.9 billion at June 30, 2012.
(c) Recorded investment of purchased impaired loans related to acquisitions.
(d) Lien position, LTV and FICO statistics are based upon customer balances.
(e) Lien position and LTV calculation at June 30, 2013 reflect the use of revised assumptions where data is missing.
(f) LTV statistics are based upon current information.
(g) Represents FICO scores that are updated at least quarterly.
(h) Ratios for the six months ended June 30, 2013 include additional consumer charge-offs taken as a result of alignment with interagency guidance on practices for loans and lines of credit we implemented in the first quarter of 2013.
(i) Data based upon recorded investment. Past due amounts exclude purchased impaired loans, even if contractually past due as we are currently accreting interest income over the expected life of the loans. In the first quarter of 2012, we adopted a policy stating that Home equity loans past due 90 days or more would be placed on nonaccrual status.
(j) Excludes satellite offices (e.g., drive-ups, electronic branches and retirement centers) that provide limited products and/or services.

Retail Banking earned $278 million in the first six months of 2013 compared with earnings of $283 million for the same period a year ago. Earnings were essentially flat compared to a year ago as higher noninterest income was offset by lower net interest income and higher noninterest expense.

Retail Banking’s core strategy is to efficiently grow customers by providing an experience that builds customer loyalty and expands loan, investment product, and money management share of wallet. Net checking relationships grew 114,000 in the first six months of 2013. The growth reflects strong results and gains in the majority of our markets, as well as strong customer retention in the overall network. As customer preferences for convenience evolve, we continue to provide more cost effective alternate servicing channels. Non-branch

 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    31


Table of Contents

deposits via ATM and mobile channels increased from 14 percent a year ago to 23 percent of the total deposits in the first half of 2013. Active online banking customers and active online bill payment customers increased by 8% and 7%, respectively, from a year ago.

Retail Banking’s footprint extends across 17 states and Washington, D.C., covering nearly half the U.S. population and serving 5.8 million consumers and 757 thousand small businesses with 2,780 branches and 7,335 ATMs. PNC consolidated 108 branches in the first six months of 2013 with plans to close an approximate total of 200 branches this year. We will continue to invest selectively in new branches and we opened seven branches in the first half of 2013.

Total revenue for the first six months of 2013 was $3.0 billion, $50 million higher than the same period of 2012. Net interest income of $2.1 billion decreased $98 million compared with the first six months of 2012. The decrease resulted from spread compression on both loans and deposits.

Noninterest income increased $148 million compared to the first half of 2012. The increase was driven by the second quarter pretax gain of $83 million on the sale of Visa Class B common shares and the impact of higher customer-initiated fee based transactions.

The provision for credit losses was $310 million and net charge-offs were $402 million in the first six months of 2013 compared with $300 million and $378 million, respectively, for the same period in 2012. The increase in net charge-offs year-over-year was due to the impact of alignment with regulatory guidance in the first quarter of 2013.

Noninterest expense increased $47 million in the first six months of 2013 compared to the same period of 2012. The increase was primarily attributable to a greater number of months’ operating expenses in 2013 associated with the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition, partially offset by lower additions to legal reserves.

Growing core checking deposits is key to Retail Banking’s growth and to providing a source of low-cost funding to PNC. The deposit product strategy of Retail Banking is to remain disciplined on pricing, target specific products and markets for growth, and focus on the retention and growth of balances for relationship customers. In the first six months of 2013, average total deposits of $134.1 billion increased $5.3 billion, or 4%, compared with the same period in 2012.

   

Average transaction deposits grew $9.0 billion, or 10% and average savings deposit balances grew $1.3 billion or 13% year-over-year as a result of organic deposit growth, continued customer preference for liquidity and the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition. In the first six months of 2013, compared with the same period a year ago, average demand deposits increased $6.0 billion, or 13%, to $52.6 billion and average

   

money market deposits increased $3.0 billion, or 7%, to $48.5 billion.

   

Total average certificates of deposit decreased $5.1 billion or 19% compared to the same period in 2012. The decline in average certificates of deposit was due to the run-off of maturing accounts.

Retail Banking continues to focus on a relationship-based lending strategy that targets specific products and markets for growth, small business and auto dealerships. In the first six months of 2013, average total loans were $65.7 billion, an increase of $2.9 billion, or 5%, over the same period in 2012.

   

Average indirect auto loans increased $2.4 billion, or 51%, over the first six months of 2012. The increase was primarily due to the expansion of our indirect sales force and product introduction to acquired markets, as well as overall increases in auto sales.

   

Average home equity loans increased $1.6 billion, or 6%, compared with the same period in 2012. The increase was driven by the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition. The remainder of the portfolio grew modestly as increases in term loans were offset by declines in lines of credit. Retail Banking’s home equity loan portfolio is relationship based, with 97% of the portfolio attributable to borrowers in our primary geographic footprint.

   

Average auto dealer floor plan loans grew $298 million, or 17%, compared with the first six months of 2012, primarily resulting from dealer line utilization and additional dealer relationships.

   

Average commercial and commercial real estate loans increased $235 million, or 2%, compared with the same period in 2012. The increase was due to the acquisition of RBC Bank (USA). The remainder of the portfolio showed a decline as loan demand was outpaced by paydowns, refinancings, and charge-offs.

   

Average credit card balances increased $84 million, or 2%, compared with the same period of 2012 as a result of the portfolio purchase from RBC Bank (Georgia), National Association in March 2012.

   

Average education loans for the first six months of 2013 declined $1.2 billion or 13% compared with the same period in 2012. The decline was a result of run-off of the discontinued government guaranteed portfolio.

   

Average indirect other and residential mortgages in this segment are primarily run-off portfolios and declined $273 million and $214 million, respectively, compared with the same period in 2012. The indirect other portfolio is comprised of marine, RV, and other indirect loan products.

Nonperforming assets totaled $1.3 billion at June 30, 2013, a 34% increase from a year ago. The increase was in consumer assets and was due to the alignment with interagency guidance on practices for loans and lines of credit related to consumer loans that we implemented in the first quarter of 2013.

 

 

32    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

CORPORATE & INSTITUTIONAL BANKING

(Unaudited)

Table 26: Corporate & Institutional Banking Table

 

Six months ended June 30

Dollars in millions, except as noted

   2013      2012  

Income Statement

       

Net interest income

   $ 1,899       $ 2,023   

Noninterest income

       

Corporate service fees

     543         448   

Other

     319         234   

Noninterest income

     862         682   

Total revenue

     2,761         2,705   

Provision for credit losses (benefit)

     (26      52   

Noninterest expense

     979         959   

Pretax earnings

     1,808         1,694   

Income taxes

     655         622   

Earnings

   $ 1,153       $ 1,072   

Average Balance Sheet

       

Loans

       

Commercial

   $ 53,696       $ 46,004   

Commercial real estate

     16,939         15,158   

Commercial – real estate related

     6,902         5,258   

Asset-based lending

     11,397         9,510   

Equipment lease financing

     6,604         5,808   

Total loans

     95,538         81,738   

Goodwill and other intangible assets

     3,763         3,595   

Loans held for sale

     1,101         1,217   

Other assets

     11,539         11,316   

Total assets

   $ 111,941       $ 97,866   

Deposits

       

Noninterest-bearing demand

   $ 40,239       $ 37,519   

Money market

     16,977         14,803   

Other

     6,947         5,653   

Total deposits

     64,163         57,975   

Other liabilities

     17,914         16,769   

Capital

     9,541         8,676   

Total liabilities and equity

   $ 91,618       $ 83,420   

Performance Ratios

       

Return on average capital

     24      25

Return on average assets

     2.08         2.20   

Noninterest income to total revenue

     31         25   

Efficiency

     35         35   

Six months ended June 30

Dollars in millions, except as noted

   2013      2012  

Commercial Mortgage Servicing Portfolio (in billions)

       

Beginning of period

   $ 282       $ 267   

Acquisitions/additions

     39         17   

Repayments/transfers

     (27      (20

End of period

   $ 294       $ 264   

Other Information

       

Consolidated revenue from: (a)

       

Treasury Management (b)

   $ 642       $ 697   

Capital Markets (c)

   $ 327       $ 307   

Commercial mortgage loans held for sale (d)

   $ 69       $ 47   

Commercial mortgage loan servicing income, net of amortization (e)

     106         83   

Commercial mortgage servicing rights recovery/(impairment), net of economic hedge (f)

     55         (1

Total commercial mortgage banking activities

   $ 230       $ 129   

Total loans (g)

   $ 97,708       $ 88,810   

Net carrying amount of commercial mortgage servicing rights (g)

   $ 525       $ 398   

Credit-related statistics:

       

Nonperforming assets (g) (h)

   $ 999       $ 1,686   

Purchased impaired loans (g) (i)

   $ 708       $ 1,088   

Net charge-offs

   $ 39       $ 73   
(a) Represents consolidated PNC amounts. See the additional revenue discussion regarding treasury management, capital markets-related products and services, and commercial mortgage banking activities in the Product Revenue section of the Corporate & Institutional Banking Review.
(b) Includes amounts reported in net interest income and corporate service fees.
(c) Includes amounts reported in net interest income, corporate service fees and other noninterest income.
(d) Includes valuations on commercial mortgage loans held for sale and related commitments, derivative valuations, origination fees, gains on sale of loans held for sale and net interest income on loans held for sale.
(e) Includes net interest income and noninterest income from loan servicing and ancillary services, net of commercial mortgage servicing rights amortization and a direct write-down of commercial mortgage servicing rights of $24 million recognized in the first quarter of 2012. Commercial mortgage servicing rights (impairment)/recovery, net of economic hedge is shown separately.
(f) Includes amounts reported in corporate services fees.
(g) As of June 30.
(h) Includes nonperforming loans of $.9 billion at June 30, 2013 and $1.6 billion at June 30, 2012.
(i) Recorded investment of purchased impaired loans related to acquisitions.
 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    33


Table of Contents

Corporate & Institutional Banking earned $1.2 billion in the first six months of 2013, an increase of $81 million compared with the first six months of 2012. The increase in earnings was due to an increase in noninterest income and improved credit quality, partially offset by lower net interest income. We continued to focus on building client relationships, including increasing cross sales and adding new clients where the risk-return profile was attractive.

Results for the first six months of 2013 include the impact of the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition, which added approximately $7.5 billion of loans and $4.8 billion of deposits as of March 2, 2012.

Highlights of Corporate & Institutional Banking’s performance include the following:

   

Corporate & Institutional Banking continued to execute on strategic initiatives, including in the Southeast, by organically growing and deepening client relationships that meet our risk/return measures. Approximately 345 new primary Corporate Banking clients were added in the first six months of 2013.

   

Loan commitments increased 10% to $186 billion at June 30, 2013 compared to June 30, 2012, primarily due to growth in our Corporate Banking, Real Estate and Business Credit businesses.

   

Period-end loan balances have increased for the eleventh consecutive quarter, including an increase of 3.0% at June 30, 2013 compared with March 31, 2013 and 10.0% compared with June 30, 2012.

   

Our Treasury Management business, which ranks among the top providers in the country, continued to invest in markets, products and infrastructure as well as major initiatives such as healthcare.

   

Midland Loan Services was the number one servicer of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac multifamily and healthcare loans and was the second leading servicer of commercial and multifamily loans by volume as of December 31, 2012 according to Mortgage Bankers Association. Midland is the only U.S. commercial mortgage servicer to receive the highest primary, master and special servicer ratings from Fitch Ratings, Standard & Poor’s and Morningstar.

   

Mergers and Acquisitions Journal named Harris Williams & Co. its 2012 Mid-Market Investment Bank of the Year. This is the second time in three years that Harris Williams & Co. has earned the title.

Net interest income was $1.9 billion in the first six months of 2013, a decrease of $124 million from the first six months of 2012, reflecting lower spreads on loans and deposits and lower purchase accounting accretion, partially offset by higher average loans and deposits.

Corporate service fees were $543 million in the first six months of 2013, an increase of $95 million from the first six

months of 2012, primarily due to higher commercial mortgage servicing revenue primarily driven by the impact of higher market interest rates on commercial mortgage servicing rights valuations, and higher treasury management fees, partially offset by lower merger and acquisition advisory fees. The major components of corporate service fees are treasury management revenue, corporate finance fees, including revenue from certain capital markets-related products and services, and commercial mortgage servicing revenue.

Other noninterest income was $319 million in the first six months of 2013 compared with $234 million in the first six months of 2012. The increase of $85 million was driven by the impact of higher market interest rates on credit valuations related to customer-initiated hedging activities and an increase in commercial mortgage loans held for sale, which more than offset lower customer driven derivatives revenue.

The provision for credit losses was a benefit of $26 million in the first six months of 2013 compared with a provision of $52 million in the first six months of 2012, primarily due to positive credit migration. Overall credit quality remains strong. Net charge-offs were $39 million in the first six months of 2013, which decreased $34 million, or 47%, compared with the 2012 period primarily attributable to lower levels of commercial real estate and commercial charge-offs and an increase in commercial real estate recoveries.

Nonperforming assets declined for the thirteenth consecutive quarter, and at $1.0 billion, represented a 41% decrease from June 30, 2012 as a result of improving credit quality.

Noninterest expense was $979 million in the first six months of 2013, an increase of $20 million or 2% from the comparable period of 2012, and included the impact of the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition and higher asset impairments.

Average loans were $95.5 billion in the first six months of 2013 compared with $81.7 billion in the first six months of 2012, an increase of 17%. This increase includes 16% organic growth, excluding the impact of the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition.

   

The Corporate Banking business provides lending, treasury management and capital markets-related products and services to mid-sized corporations, government and not-for-profit entities, and to large corporations. Average loans for this business increased $7.4 billion, or 17%, in the first six months of 2013 compared with the first six months of 2012, primarily due to an increase in loan commitments from new customers. Organically, average loans for this business grew 15% in the comparison.

   

PNC Real Estate provides commercial real estate and real estate-related lending and is one of the industry’s top providers of both conventional and affordable multifamily financing. Average loans for this business increased $3.6 billion, or 20%, in the first

 

 

34    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents
   

six months of 2013 compared with the first six months of 2012 due to increased originations.

   

PNC Business Credit is one of the top three asset-based lenders in the country, as of year-end 2012, with increasing market share according to the Commercial Finance Association. The loan portfolio is relatively high yielding, with moderate risk as the loans are mainly secured by short-term assets. Average loans increased $1.9 billion, or 20%, in the first six months of 2013 compared with the first six months of 2012 due to customers seeking stable lending sources, loan usage rates and market share expansion.

   

PNC Equipment Finance is the 4th largest bank-affiliated leasing company with over $11 billion in equipment finance assets.

Average deposits were $64.2 billion in the first six months of 2013, an increase of $6.2 billion, or 11%, compared with the first six months of 2012 due to deposits added in the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition and inflows into noninterest-bearing deposits.

The commercial mortgage servicing portfolio was $294 billion at June 30, 2013 compared with $264 billion at June 30, 2012 as servicing additions exceeded portfolio run-off.

Product Revenue

In addition to credit and deposit products for commercial customers, Corporate & Institutional Banking offers other services, including treasury management, capital markets-related products and services, and commercial mortgage banking activities, for customers of all our business segments. The revenue from these other services is included in net interest income, corporate service fees and other noninterest income. The majority of the revenue and expense related to these services is reflected in the Corporate & Institutional Banking segment results and the remainder is reflected in the results of other businesses. The Other Information section in Table 26: Corporate & Institutional Banking Table in this Business Segments Review section includes the consolidated revenue to PNC for these services. A discussion of the consolidated revenue from these services follows.

Treasury management revenue, comprised of fees and net interest income from customer deposit balances, totaled $642 million for the first six months of 2013 and $697 million for the first six months of 2012. Lower spreads on deposits drove the decline in revenue in the first six months of 2013 compared to the first six months of 2012. Growth in deposit balances and core businesses such as commercial card, account services, wire and ACH was strong.

Capital markets revenue includes merger and acquisition advisory fees, loan syndications, derivatives, foreign exchange, fees on the asset-backed commercial paper conduit and fixed income activities. Revenue from capital markets-related products and services totaled $327 million in the first six months of 2013 compared with $307 million in the first six months of 2012. The increase in the comparison was driven by the impact of higher market interest rates on credit valuations related to customer-initiated hedging activities, mostly offset by lower merger and acquisition advisory fees and lower customer driven derivatives revenue.

Commercial mortgage banking activities include revenue derived from commercial mortgage servicing (including net interest income and noninterest income from loan servicing and ancillary services, net of commercial mortgage servicing rights amortization, and commercial mortgage servicing rights valuations net of economic hedge), and revenue derived from commercial mortgage loans intended for sale and related hedges (including loan origination fees, net interest income, valuation adjustments and gains or losses on sales).

Commercial mortgage banking activities resulted in revenue of $230 million in the first six months of 2013 compared with $129 million in the first six months of 2012. The increase in the comparison was mainly due to higher net revenue from commercial mortgage servicing, primarily driven by the impact of higher market interest rates on commercial mortgage servicing rights valuations and higher loan originations. The first six months of 2012 included a direct write-down of commercial mortgage servicing rights of $24 million.

 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    35


Table of Contents

ASSET MANAGEMENT GROUP

(Unaudited)

Table 27: Asset Management Group Table

 

Six months ended June 30

Dollars in millions, except as noted

   2013      2012  

Income Statement

       

Net interest income

   $ 143       $ 150   

Noninterest income

     366         333   

Total revenue

     509         483   

Provision for credit losses

     6         9   

Noninterest expense

     378         357   

Pretax earnings

     125         117   

Income taxes

     46         43   

Earnings

   $ 79       $ 74   

Average Balance Sheet

       

Loans

       

Consumer

   $ 4,870       $ 4,252   

Commercial and commercial real estate

     1,040         1,112   

Residential mortgage

     772         692   

Total loans

     6,682         6,056   

Goodwill and other intangible assets

     302         339   

Other assets

     226         218   

Total assets

   $ 7,210       $ 6,613   

Deposits

       

Noninterest-bearing demand

   $ 1,290       $ 1,468   

Interest-bearing demand

     3,545         2,656   

Money market

     3,781         3,593   

Total transaction deposits

     8,616         7,717   

CDs/IRAs/savings deposits

     448         519   

Total deposits

     9,064         8,236   

Other liabilities

     59         70   

Capital

     465         405   

Total liabilities and equity

   $ 9,588       $ 8,711   

Performance Ratios

       

Return on average capital

     34      37

Return on average assets

     2.21         2.25   

Noninterest income to total revenue

     72         69   

Efficiency

     74         74   

Six months ended June 30

Dollars in millions, except as noted

   2013      2012  

Other Information

       

Total nonperforming assets (a) (b)

   $ 69       $ 67   

Purchased impaired loans (a) (c)

   $ 102       $ 122   

Total net charge-offs

   $ 5       $ 5   

Assets Under Administration
(in billions) (a) (d)

       

Personal

   $ 112       $ 102   

Institutional

     121         112   

Total

   $ 233       $ 214   

Asset Type

       

Equity

   $ 130       $ 116   

Fixed Income

     70         66   

Liquidity/Other

     33         32   

Total

   $ 233       $ 214   

Discretionary assets under management

       

Personal

   $ 78       $ 71   

Institutional

     39         38   

Total

   $ 117       $ 109   

Asset Type

       

Equity

   $ 62       $ 56   

Fixed Income

     39         38   

Liquidity/Other

     16         15   

Total

   $ 117       $ 109   

Nondiscretionary assets under administration

       

Personal

   $ 34       $ 31   

Institutional

     82         74   

Total

   $ 116       $ 105   

Asset Type

       

Equity

   $ 68       $ 60   

Fixed Income

     31         28   

Liquidity/Other

     17         17   

Total

   $ 116       $ 105   
(a) As of June 30.
(b) Includes nonperforming loans of $64 million at June 30, 2013 and $63 million at June 30, 2012.
(c) Recorded investment of purchased impaired loans related to acquisitions.
(d) Excludes brokerage account assets.
 

 

36    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

Asset Management Group earned $79 million through the first six months of 2013 compared with $74 million in the same period of 2012. The increase in earnings was due to higher revenue of $26 million partially offset by higher noninterest expense. Assets under administration were $233 billion as of June 30, 2013 compared to $214 billion as of June 30, 2012.

The core growth strategies for the business continue to include: investing in higher growth geographies, increasing internal referral sales and adding new front line sales staff. Through the first six months of 2013, the business delivered strong sales production and benefited from significant referrals from other PNC lines of business. Over time, the successful execution of these strategies and the accumulation of our strong sales performance are expected to create meaningful growth in assets under management and noninterest income.

Highlights of Asset Management Group’s performance during the first six months of 2013 include the following:

   

Positive net flows of approximately $2.1 billion in discretionary assets under management after adjustments to total net flows for cyclical client activities,

   

New primary client acquisition increased 36% over the first six months of 2012,

   

Strong sales production, up nearly 24% over the first six months of 2012,

   

Significant referrals from other PNC lines of business, an increase of 51% over the first six months of 2012, and

   

Continuing levels of new business investment and focused hiring to drive growth resulting in a 6% increase in personnel at June 30, 2013 versus June 30, 2012.

Assets under administration were $233 billion at June 30, 2013, an increase of $19 billion compared to June 30 of the

prior year. Discretionary assets under management were $117 billion at June 30, 2013 compared with $109 billion at June 30, 2012. The increase was driven by higher equity markets and positive net flows due to strong sales performance and successful client retention.

Total revenue for the first half of 2013 was $509 million compared with $483 million for the same period in 2012. Net interest income was $143 million for the first six months of 2013 compared with $150 million for the same period in 2012 due to narrower spreads partially offset by balance sheet growth. Noninterest income was $366 million for the first six months of 2013, an increase of $33 million, or 10%, from the prior year period due to stronger average equity markets and positive net flows.

Provision for credit losses was $6 million for the first six months of 2013 compared to $9 million for the same period of 2012. Noninterest expense was $378 million in the first half of 2013, an increase of $21 million, or 6%, from the prior year period. The increase was primarily attributable to compensation expense. Over the last 12 months, total full-time headcount has increased by approximately 195 positions, or 6%. Asset Management Group remains focused on disciplined expense management as it invests in these strategic growth opportunities.

Average deposits for the first half of 2013 increased $828 million, or 10%, over the prior year period. Average transaction deposits grew 12% compared with the first half of 2012 and were partially offset by the run-off of maturing certificates of deposit. Average loan balances of $6.7 billion increased $.6 billion, or 10%, from the prior year period due to continued growth in the consumer loan portfolio, primarily home equity installment loans due to a favorable rate environment.

 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    37


Table of Contents

RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE BANKING

(Unaudited)

Table 28: Residential Mortgage Banking Table

 

Six months ended June 30

Dollars in millions, except as noted

   2013     2012  

Income Statement

      

Net interest income

   $ 99      $ 104   

Noninterest income

      

Loan servicing revenue

      

Servicing fees

     78        108   

Net MSR hedging gains

     63        110   

Loan sales revenue

      

Provision for residential mortgage repurchase obligations

     (77     (470

Loan sales revenue

     362        318   

Other

     (6     14   

Total noninterest income

     420        80   

Total revenue

     519        184   

Provision for credit losses (benefit)

     24        (9

Noninterest expense

     392        433   

Pretax earnings

     103        (240

Income taxes (benefit)

     38        (88

Earnings (loss)

   $ 65      $ (152

Average Balance Sheet

      

Portfolio loans

   $ 2,478      $ 2,836   

Loans held for sale

     2,072        1,753   

Mortgage servicing rights (MSR)

     807        655   

Other assets

     5,247        6,501   

Total assets

   $ 10,604      $ 11,745   

Deposits

   $ 3,183      $ 1,723   

Borrowings and other liabilities

     3,351        4,209   

Capital

     1,622        995   

Total liabilities and equity

   $ 8,156      $ 6,927   

Performance Ratios

      

Return on average capital

     8     (31 )% 

Return on average assets

     1.24        (2.60

Noninterest income to total revenue

     81        43   

Efficiency

     76        235   

Six months ended June 30

Dollars in millions, except as noted

   2013     2012  

Residential Mortgage Servicing Portfolio – Third-Party (in billions)

      

Beginning of period

   $ 119      $ 118   

Acquisitions

     6        7   

Additions

     8        6   

Repayments/transfers

     (17     (15

End of period

   $ 116      $ 116   

Servicing portfolio – third-party statistics: (a)

      

Fixed rate

     92     91

Adjustable rate/balloon

     8     9

Weighted-average interest rate

     4.72     5.21

MSR capitalized value (in billions)

   $ 1.0      $ .6   

MSR capitalization value (in basis points)

     84        50   

Weighted-average servicing fee
(in basis points)

     28        29   

Residential Mortgage Repurchase Reserve

      

Beginning of period

   $ 614      $ 83   

Provision

     77        470   

RBC Bank (USA) acquisition

       26   

Losses – loan repurchases and settlements

     (168     (117

End of Period

   $ 523      $ 462   

Other Information

      

Loan origination volume (in billions)

   $ 8.9      $ 7.0   

Loan sale margin percentage

     4.05     4.54

Percentage of originations represented by:

      

Agency and government programs

     100     100

Refinance volume

     76     77

Total nonperforming assets (a) (b)

   $ 220      $ 78   

Purchased impaired loans (a) (c)

   $ 8      $ 84   
(a) As of June 30.
(b) Includes nonperforming loans of $177 million at June 30, 2013 and $37 million at June 30, 2012.
(c) Recorded investment of purchased impaired loans related to acquisitions.
 

 

38    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

Residential Mortgage Banking reported net income of $65 million in the first six months of 2013 compared with a net loss of $152 million in the first six months of 2012. Earnings increased from the prior year six month period primarily as a result of decreased provision for residential mortgage repurchase obligations.

The strategic focus of the business is the acquisition of new customers through a retail loan officer sales force with an emphasis on home purchase transactions. Two key aspects of this strategy are: (1) competing on the basis of superior service to new and existing customers in serving their home purchase and refinancing needs; and (2) operating strategic partnerships with reputable residential real estate franchises to acquire new customers. A key consideration in pursuing this approach is the cross-sell opportunity, especially in the bank footprint markets.

Residential Mortgage Banking overview:

   

Total loan originations were $8.9 billion for the first six months of 2013 compared with $7.0 billion in the comparable period of 2012. Loans continue to be originated primarily through direct channels under Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC) and Federal Housing Administration (FHA)/Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) agency guidelines. Refinancings were 76% of originations for the first six months of 2013 and 77% in the first six months of 2012. During the first six months of 2013, 33% of loan originations were under the original or revised Home Affordable Refinance Program (HARP or HARP 2).

   

Investors having purchased mortgage loans may request PNC to indemnify them against losses on certain loans or to repurchase loans that they believe do not comply with applicable contractual loan origination covenants and representations and warranties we have made. At June 30, 2013, the

   

liability for estimated losses on repurchase and indemnification claims for the Residential Mortgage Banking business segment was $523 million compared with $462 million at June 30, 2012. See the Recourse And Repurchase Obligations section of this Financial Review and Note 18 Commitments and Guarantees in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements of this Report for additional information.

   

PNC has and expects to experience elevated levels of residential mortgage loan repurchase demands reflecting a change in behavior and demand patterns of two government-sponsored enterprises, FNMA and FHLMC, primarily related to loans sold in 2008 and prior in agency securitizations.

   

Residential mortgage loans serviced for others totaled $116 billion at both June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012 as payoffs continued to approximate new direct loan origination volume and acquisitions.

   

Noninterest income was $420 million in the first six months of 2013 compared with $80 million in the first six months of 2012. The decreases in MSR hedging gains and servicing fees were more than offset by lower recourse provision in the 2013 period and increased loan sales revenue.

   

Net interest income was $99 million in the first six months of 2013 compared with $104 million in the first six months of 2012.

   

Noninterest expense was $392 million in the first six months of 2013 compared with $433 million in the first six months of 2012. Increased expense on higher loan origination volumes was more than offset by lower residential mortgage foreclosure-related expenses and legal expenses.

   

The fair value of mortgage servicing rights was $1.0 billion at June 30, 2013 compared with $0.6 billion at June 30, 2012. The increase in fair value was primarily due to rising residential mortgage interest rates at June 30, 2013.

 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    39


Table of Contents

BLACKROCK

(Unaudited)

Table 29: BlackRock Table

Information related to our equity investment in BlackRock follows:

 

Six months ended June 30

Dollars in millions

   2013      2012  

Business segment earnings (a)

   $ 220       $ 178   

PNC’s economic interest in BlackRock (b)

     22      22
(a) Includes PNC’s share of BlackRock’s reported GAAP earnings and additional income taxes on those earnings incurred by PNC.
(b) At June 30.

 

In billions    June 30
2013
     December 31
2012
 

Carrying value of PNC’s investment in BlackRock (c)

   $ 5.8       $ 5.6   

Market value of PNC’s investment in BlackRock (d)

     9.2         7.4   
(c) PNC accounts for its investment in BlackRock under the equity method of accounting, exclusive of a related deferred tax liability of $1.9 billion at both June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. Our voting interest in BlackRock common stock was approximately 21% at June 30, 2013.
(d) Does not include liquidity discount.

PNC accounts for its BlackRock Series C Preferred Stock at fair value, which offsets the impact of marking-to-market the obligation to deliver these shares to BlackRock to partially fund BlackRock long-term incentive plan (LTIP) programs. The fair value amount of the BlackRock Series C Preferred Stock is included on our Consolidated Balance Sheet in the caption Other assets. Additional information regarding the valuation of the BlackRock Series C Preferred Stock is included in Note 9 Fair Value in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Report and in Note 9 in our 2012 Form 10-K.

On January 31, 2013, we transferred 205,350 shares of BlackRock Series C Preferred Stock to BlackRock to satisfy a portion of our LTIP obligation. The transfer reduced Other assets and Other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheet by $33 million. At June 30, 2013, we hold approximately 1.3 million shares of BlackRock Series C Preferred Stock which are available to fund our obligation in connection with the BlackRock LTIP programs.

Our 2012 Form 10-K includes additional information about our investment in BlackRock.

NON-STRATEGIC ASSETS PORTFOLIO

(Unaudited)

Table 30: Non-Strategic Assets Portfolio Table

 

 

Six months ended June 30

Dollars in millions

   2013      2012  

Income Statement

       

Net interest income

   $ 367       $ 438   

Noninterest income

     27         (17

Total revenue

     394         421   

Provision for credit losses

     81         68   

Noninterest expense

     93         135   

Pretax earnings

     220         218   

Income taxes

     81         80   

Earnings

   $ 139       $ 138   

Average Balance Sheet

       

Commercial Lending:

       

Commercial/Commercial real estate

   $ 487       $ 1,006   

Lease financing

     691         672   

Total commercial lending

     1,178         1,678   

Consumer Lending:

       

Home equity

     4,139         4,758   

Residential real estate

     5,823         6,291   

Total consumer lending

     9,962         11,049   

Total portfolio loans

     11,140         12,727   

Other assets (a)

     (629      (320

Total assets

   $ 10,511       $ 12,407   

Deposits and other liabilities

   $ 222       $ 179   

Capital

     1,104         1,244   

Total liabilities and equity

   $ 1,326       $ 1,423   

Performance Ratios

       

Return on average capital

     25      22

Return on average assets

     2.67         2.24   

Noninterest income to total revenue

     7         (4

Efficiency

     24         32   

Other Information

       

Nonperforming assets (b)(c)

   $ 935       $ 1,120   

Purchased impaired loans (b)(d)

   $ 5,193       $ 5,889   

Net charge-offs (e)

   $ 140       $ 174   

Annualized net charge-off ratio (e)

     2.53      2.75

Loans (b)

       

Commercial Lending

       

Commercial/Commercial real estate

   $ 388       $ 945   

Lease financing

     696         677   

Total commercial lending

     1,084         1,622   

Consumer Lending

       

Home equity

     4,029         4,575   

Residential real estate

     5,659         6,475   

Total consumer lending

     9,688         11,050   

Total loans

   $ 10,772       $ 12,672   
(a) Other assets includes deferred taxes, ALLL and OREO. Other assets were negative in both periods due to the ALLL.
(b) As of June 30.
(c) Includes nonperforming loans of $.7 billion at June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012
(d) Recorded investment of purchased impaired loans related to acquisitions. At June 30, 2013, this segment contained 77% of PNC’s purchased impaired loans.
(e) For the six months ended June 30.
 

 

40    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

This business segment consists primarily of non-strategic assets obtained through acquisitions of other companies. Non-Strategic Assets Portfolio had earnings of $139 million in the first six months of 2013 compared with $138 million in the first six months of 2012. Earnings were relatively flat year-over-year as higher noninterest income and lower noninterest expense were offset by lower net interest income and a higher provision for credit losses.

The first six months of 2013 included the impact of the March 2012 RBC Bank (USA) acquisition, which added approximately $1.0 billion of residential real estate loans, $.2 billion of commercial/commercial real estate loans and $.2 billion of OREO assets. Of these assets, $1.0 billion were deemed purchased impaired loans.

Non-Strategic Assets Portfolio overview:

   

Net interest income was $367 million in the first six months of 2013 compared with $438 million in the first six months of 2012. The decrease was driven by lower purchase accounting accretion as well as lower average loan balances.

   

Noninterest income was $27 million in the first six months of 2013 compared with a loss of $17 million in the first six months of 2012. The increase was driven by lower provision for estimated losses on home equity repurchase obligations.

   

The provision for credit losses was $81 million in the first six months of 2013 compared with $68 million in the first six months of 2012 driven by a decrease in expected cash flows on purchased impaired home equity loans.

   

Noninterest expense in the first six months of 2013 was $93 million compared with $135 million in the first six months of 2012. The decrease was driven by lower commercial OREO write-downs.

   

Average portfolio loans declined to $11.1 billion in the first six months of 2013 compared with $12.7 billion in the first six months of 2012. The overall decline was driven by customer payment activity and portfolio management activities to reduce under-performing assets, partially offset by the addition of loans from the March 2012 RBC Bank (USA) acquisition.

   

Nonperforming loans were at $.7 billion at June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012. The consumer lending portfolio comprised 86% of the nonperforming loans in this segment at June 30, 2013. Nonperforming

   

consumer loans increased $128 million from June 30, 2012, due to alignment with interagency guidance in the first quarter of 2013. The commercial lending portfolio comprised 14% of the nonperforming loans as of June 30, 2013. Nonperforming commercial loans decreased $99 million from June 30, 2012.

   

Net charge-offs were $140 million in the first six months of 2013 and $174 million in the first six months of 2012 primarily due to lower charge-offs on home equity loans.

The business activity of this segment is to manage the wind-down of the portfolio while maximizing the value and mitigating risk. The fair value marks taken upon acquisition of the assets, the team we have in place and targeted asset resolution strategies help us to manage these assets.

   

The Commercial Lending portfolio declined 33% since June 30, 2012. Commercial and commercial real estate loans declined 59% to $.4 billion while the lease financing portfolio remained relatively flat at $.7 billion. The leases are long-term with relatively low credit risk.

   

The Consumer Lending portfolio declined $1.4 billion, or 12%, when compared to June 30 of last year. The portfolio’s credit quality has stabilized through actions taken by management. We have implemented various refinance programs, line management programs and loss mitigation programs to mitigate risks within this portfolio while assisting borrowers to maintain home ownership when possible.

   

When loans are sold, we may assume certain loan repurchase obligations to indemnify investors against losses or to repurchase loans that they believe do not comply with applicable contractual loan origination covenants and representations and warranties we have made. From 2005 to 2007, home equity loans were sold with such contractual provisions. At June 30, 2013, the liability for estimated losses on repurchase and indemnification claims for the Non-Strategic Assets Portfolio was $24 million compared to $61 million at June 30, 2012. See the Recourse And Repurchase Obligations section of this Financial Review and Note 18 Commitments and Guarantees in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Report for additional information.

 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    41


Table of Contents

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND JUDGMENTS

Note 1 Accounting Policies in Item 8 of our 2012 Form 10-K and in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Report describe the most significant accounting policies that we use. Certain of these policies require us to make estimates or economic assumptions that may prove inaccurate or be subject to variations that may significantly affect our reported results and financial position for the period or in future periods.

We must use estimates, assumptions and judgments when assets and liabilities are required to be recorded at, or adjusted to reflect, fair value.

Assets and liabilities carried at fair value inherently result in a higher degree of financial statement volatility. Fair values and the information used to record valuation adjustments for certain assets and liabilities are based on either quoted market prices or are provided by independent third-party sources, including appraisers and valuation specialists, when available. When such third-party information is not available, we estimate fair value primarily by using cash flow and other financial modeling techniques. Changes in underlying factors, assumptions or estimates could materially impact our future financial condition and results of operations.

We discuss the following critical accounting policies and judgments under this same heading in Item 7 of our 2012 Form 10-K:

   

Fair Value Measurements

   

Allowances For Loan And Lease Losses And Unfunded Loan Commitments And Letters of Credit

   

Estimated Cash Flows On Purchased Impaired Loans

   

Goodwill

   

Lease Residuals

   

Revenue Recognition

   

Residential And Commercial Mortgage Servicing Rights

   

Income Taxes

   

Proposed Accounting Standards

We provide additional information about many of these items in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item l of this Report.

The following critical accounting estimate and judgment has been updated during the first six months of 2013.

ALLOWANCES FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES AND UNFUNDED LOAN COMMITMENTS AND LETTERS OF CREDIT

We maintain the ALLL and the Allowance For Unfunded Loan Commitments And Letters Of Credit at levels that we believe to be appropriate to absorb estimated probable credit losses incurred in the loan and lease portfolio and on these

unfunded credit facilities as of the balance sheet date. Our determination of these allowances is based on periodic evaluations of the loan and lease portfolios and unfunded credit facilities and other relevant factors. These critical estimates include the use of significant amounts of PNC’s own historical data and complex methods to interpret them. We have an ongoing process to evaluate and enhance the quality, quantity and timeliness of our data and interpretation methods used in the determination of these allowances. These evaluations are inherently subjective as they require material estimates, all of which may be susceptible to significant change, including, among others:

   

Probability of default (PD),

   

Loss given default (LGD),

   

Exposure at date of default,

   

Movement through delinquency stages,

   

Amounts and timing of expected future cash flows,

   

Value of collateral, which may be obtained from third parties, and

   

Qualitative factors, such as changes in current economic conditions, that may not be reflected in historical results.

In determining the appropriateness of the ALLL, we make specific allocations to impaired loans and allocations to portfolios of commercial and consumer loans. We also allocate reserves to provide coverage for probable losses incurred in the portfolio at the balance sheet date based upon current market conditions, which may not be reflected in historical loss data. Commercial lending is the largest category of credits and is sensitive to changes in assumptions and judgments underlying the determination of the ALLL. We have allocated approximately $1.7 billion, or 44%, of the ALLL at June 30, 2013 to the commercial lending category. Consumer lending allocations are made based on historical loss experience adjusted for recent activity. Approximately $2.1 billion, or 56%, of the ALLL at June 30, 2013 has been allocated to these consumer lending categories.

RECENTLY PROPOSED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Proposed Accounting Standards Update (ASU) Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. This exposure draft would change the determination of the classification and measurement of financial instruments. Under the proposal, loans and securities would be classified and measured based on both the contractual cash flow characteristics of the assets and the business model for managing the assets. Financial assets would be included in one of three categories: (i) amortized cost, (ii) fair value through other comprehensive income, and (iii) fair value through net income, while financial liabilities would generally be measured at amortized cost. In April 2013, the FASB issued a related document which proposes amendments to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification as a result of the proposed classification and measurement

 

 

42    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

model. The effective date of the proposals has not yet been determined. We are evaluating the impact of these proposals on our financial statements.

In April 2013, the FASB issued Proposed ASU, Investments – Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Accounting for Investments in Qualified Affordable Housing Projects. This exposure draft addresses the accounting for an investment in a Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) partnership through a limited partnership investment. If certain criteria are met, the allocated tax credits, net of amortization of the investment, could be recognized in income taxes attributable to continuing operations under the effective yield method. The exposure draft also requires disclosure of information regarding the nature of LIHTC investments and whether they are accounted for under the effective yield or equity method. The effective date has not yet been determined. We are evaluating the impact of this proposal on our financial statements.

In May 2013, the FASB issued Proposed ASU, Leases (Topic 842), a revision of the 2010 proposed FASB Accounting Standards Update, Leases (Topic 840). The Proposed ASU would require lessees to recognize right of use assets and lease liabilities for most leases. Depending on the significance of the present value of minimum lease payments to the fair value of the underlying asset or its useful life to the lease term, leases are classified as “Type A” or “Type B” leases. As per the Proposed ASU, most leases of assets other than property (i.e. land and/or building or part of a building) would be classified as Type A leases, while most property leases would be classified as Type B leases. For Type A leases, lessees would generally recognize amortization of the right of use asset on a straight-line basis and interest expense on the lease liability under the effective interest method, whereas, for Type B leases, lessees would generally recognize the total lease expense on a straight-line basis. Lessors would account for a Type A lease similar to a finance lease and a Type B lease similar to an operating lease. The effective date has not been determined. We are evaluating the impact of the proposal on our financial statements.

In June 2013, the FASB issued Proposed ASU, Insurance Contracts (Topic 834). This exposure draft would change the accounting and financial reporting for insurance and reinsurance contracts issued and reinsurance contracts held, regardless of the type of entity issuing or holding these contracts. Certain financial guarantee contracts would also meet the definition of an insurance contract. The exposure draft introduces a building-block approach (based on a discounted estimate of future cash flows under the contract and a margin to remove any gain at inception) to account for most life, annuity, and long-term health contracts and a

premium allocation approach (comprising a liability for the remaining coverage under the contract and a liability for incurred claims) for most property and casualty and short-term health contracts. The effective date has not yet been determined. We are evaluating the impact of the proposal on our financial statements.

In July 2013, the FASB issued Proposed ASU, Receivables – Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors (Subtopic 310-40): Reclassification of Collateralized Mortgage Loans upon a Troubled Debt Restructuring. This exposure draft would clarify that an in substance repossession or foreclosure occurs, and a creditor is considered to have received physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan, upon (1) the creditor obtaining legal title to the residential real estate property or (2) completion of a deed in lieu of foreclosure or similar legal agreement under which the borrower conveys all interest in the residential real estate property to the creditor to satisfy that loan, even though the legal title may not yet have passed. The exposure draft would also require additional disclosures, including: (1) a rollforward schedule reconciling the change from the beginning to the ending balance of foreclosed properties at every reporting period and (2) the recorded investment in consumer mortgage loans secured by residential real estate properties that are in the process of foreclosure. The effective date has not yet been determined. We are evaluating the impact of the proposal on our financial statements.

In July 2013, the FASB issued Proposed ASU, Consolidation (Topic 810): Measuring the Financial Liabilities of a Consolidated Collateralized Financing Entity. This Proposed ASU would define “collateralized financing entity” and allow a reporting entity that consolidates a collateralized financing entity and recognizes the associated financial assets at fair value, to measure the financial liabilities based on the fair value of the financial assets. The reporting entity would allocate this value to individual liabilities on a reasonable and consistent basis. The Proposed ASU would allow for a modified retrospective transition approach which includes a cumulative-effect adjustment to equity as of the beginning of the period of adoption. Early adoption would be permitted. The effective date has not yet been determined. We are evaluating the impact of the proposal on our financial statements.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

For information on Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements, see Note 1 Accounting Policies in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item I of this Report regarding the impact of the adoption of new accounting guidance issued by the FASB.

 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    43


Table of Contents

STATUS OF QUALIFIED DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN

We have a noncontributory, qualified defined benefit pension plan (plan or pension plan) covering eligible employees. Benefits are determined using a cash balance formula where earnings credits are applied as a percentage of eligible compensation. We calculate the expense associated with the pension plan, and the assumptions and methods that we use include a policy of reflecting trust assets at their fair market value. On an annual basis, we review the actuarial assumptions related to the pension plan.

We currently estimate a pretax pension expense of $74 million in 2013 compared with pretax expense of $89 million in 2012. This year-over-year expected decrease reflects the impact of favorable returns on plan assets experienced in 2012, as well as the effects of the lower discount rate required to be used in 2013.

The following table reflects the estimated effects on pension expense of certain changes in annual assumptions, using 2013 estimated expense as a baseline.

Table 31: Pension Expense – Sensitivity Analysis

 

Change in Assumption (a)    Estimated Increase to 2013
Pension Expense (In  millions)
 

.5% decrease in discount rate

   $ 21  

.5% decrease in expected long-term return on assets

   $ 19   

.5% increase in compensation rate

   $ 2   
(a) The impact is the effect of changing the specified assumption while holding all other assumptions constant.

We provide additional information on our pension plan in Note 15 Employee Benefit Plans in our 2012 Form 10-K.

RECOURSE AND REPURCHASE OBLIGATIONS

As discussed in Note 3 Loan Sale and Servicing Activities and Variable Interest Entities in our 2012 Form 10-K, PNC has sold commercial mortgage, residential mortgage and home equity loans directly or indirectly through securitization and loan sale transactions in which we have continuing involvement. One form of continuing involvement includes certain recourse and loan repurchase obligations associated with the transferred assets.

COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE LOAN RECOURSE OBLIGATIONS

We originate, close and service certain multi-family commercial mortgage loans which are sold to FNMA under FNMA’s Delegated Underwriting and Servicing (DUS) program. We participated in a similar program with the FHLMC. For more information regarding our Commercial Mortgage Loan Recourse Obligations, see the Recourse and

Repurchase Obligations section of Note 18 Commitments and Guarantees included in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in Part 1, Item 1 of this Report.

RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE REPURCHASE OBLIGATIONS

While residential mortgage loans are sold on a non-recourse basis, we assume certain loan repurchase obligations associated with mortgage loans we have sold to investors. These loan repurchase obligations primarily relate to situations where PNC is alleged to have breached certain origination covenants and representations and warranties made to purchasers of the loans in the respective purchase and sale agreements. Residential mortgage loans covered by these loan repurchase obligations include first and second-lien mortgage loans we have sold through Agency securitizations, Non-Agency securitizations, and loan sale transactions. As discussed in Note 3 in our 2012 Form 10-K, Agency securitizations consist of mortgage loan sale transactions with FNMA, FHLMC and the Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA), while Non-Agency securitizations consist of mortgage loan sale transactions with private investors. Mortgage loan sale transactions that are not part of a securitization may involve FNMA, FHLMC or private investors. Our historical exposure and activity associated with Agency securitization repurchase obligations has primarily been related to transactions with FNMA and FHLMC, as indemnification and repurchase losses associated with FHA and VA-insured and uninsured loans pooled in GNMA securitizations historically have been minimal. Repurchase obligation activity associated with residential mortgages is reported in the Residential Mortgage Banking segment.

Loan covenants and representations and warranties are established through loan sale agreements with various investors to provide assurance that PNC has sold loans that are of sufficient investment quality. Key aspects of such covenants and representations and warranties include the loan’s compliance with any applicable loan criteria established for the transaction, including underwriting standards, delivery of all required loan documents to the investor or its designated party, sufficient collateral valuation and the validity of the lien securing the loan. As a result of alleged breaches of these contractual obligations, investors may request PNC to indemnify them against losses on certain loans or to repurchase loans.

We investigate every investor claim on a loan by loan basis to determine the existence of a legitimate claim, and that all other conditions for indemnification or repurchase have been met prior to the settlement with that investor. Indemnifications for loss or loan repurchases typically occur when, after review of the claim, we agree insufficient evidence exists to dispute the investor’s claim that a breach of a loan covenant and representation and warranty has occurred, such breach has not been cured and the effect of such breach is deemed to have had a material and adverse effect on the value of the transferred loan. Depending on the sale agreement and upon

 

 

44    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

proper notice from the investor, we typically respond to such indemnification and repurchase requests within 60 days, although final resolution of the claim may take a longer period of time. With the exception of the sales agreements associated with the Agency securitizations, most sale agreements do not provide for penalties or other remedies if we do not respond timely to investor indemnification or repurchase requests.

Indemnification and repurchase claims are typically settled on an individual loan basis through make-whole payments or loan repurchases; however, on occasion we may negotiate pooled settlements with investors. In connection with pooled settlements, we typically do not repurchase loans and the consummation of such transactions generally results in us no longer having indemnification and repurchase exposure with the investor in the transaction.

For the first and second-lien mortgage balances of unresolved and settled claims contained in the tables below, a significant amount of these claims were associated with sold loans originated through correspondent lender and broker origination channels. In certain instances when indemnification or repurchase claims are settled for these types of sold loans, we have recourse back to the correspondent lenders, brokers and other third-parties (e.g., contract underwriting companies, closing agents, appraisers, etc.). Depending on the underlying reason for the investor claim, we determine our ability to pursue recourse with these parties and file claims with them accordingly. Our historical recourse recovery rate has been insignificant as our efforts have been impacted by the inability of such parties to reimburse us for their recourse obligations (e.g., their capital availability or whether they remain in business) or factors that

limit our ability to pursue recourse from these parties (e.g., contractual loss caps, statutes of limitations).

Origination and sale of residential mortgages is an ongoing business activity and, accordingly, management continually assesses the need to recognize indemnification and repurchase liabilities pursuant to the associated investor sale agreements. We establish indemnification and repurchase liabilities for estimated losses on sold first and second-lien mortgages for which indemnification is expected to be provided or for loans that are expected to be repurchased. For the first and second-lien mortgage sold portfolio, we have established an indemnification and repurchase liability pursuant to investor sale agreements based on claims made and our estimate of future claims on a loan by loan basis. To estimate the mortgage repurchase liability arising from breaches of representations and warranties, we consider the following factors: (i) borrower performance in our historically sold portfolio (both actual and estimated future defaults), (ii) the level of outstanding unresolved repurchase claims, (iii) estimated probable future repurchase claims, considering information about file requests, delinquent and liquidated loans, resolved and unresolved mortgage insurance rescission notices and our historical experience with claim rescissions, (iv) the potential ability to cure the defects identified in the repurchase claims (“rescission rate”) and (v) the estimated severity of loss upon repurchase of the loan or collateral, make-whole settlement or indemnification.

See Note 18 Commitments and Guarantees in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Report for additional information.

 

 

The following tables present the unpaid principal balance of repurchase claims by vintage and total unresolved repurchase claims for the past five quarters.

Table 32: Analysis of Quarterly Residential Mortgage Repurchase Claims by Vintage

 

Dollars in millions    June 30
2013
     March 31
2013
     December 31
2012
     September 30
2012
     June 30
2012
 

2004 & Prior

   $ 51       $ 12       $ 11       $ 15       $ 31   

2005

     7         10         8         10         19   

2006

     19         28         23         30         56   

2007

     36         108         45         137         182   

2008

     9         15         7         23         49   

2008 & Prior

     122         173         94         215         337   

2009 – 2013

     14         50         38         52         42   

Total

   $ 136       $ 223       $ 132       $ 267       $ 379   

FNMA, FHLMC and GNMA %

     92      95      94      87      86

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    45


Table of Contents

Table 33: Analysis of Quarterly Residential Mortgage Unresolved Asserted Indemnification and Repurchase Claims

 

Dollars in millions    June 30
2013
     March 31
2013
     December 31
2012
     September 30
2012
     June 30
2012
 

FNMA, FHLMC and GNMA Securitizations

   $ 96       $ 165       $ 290       $ 430       $ 419   

Private Investors (a)

     37         45         47         82         83   

Total unresolved claims

   $ 133       $ 210       $ 337       $ 512       $ 502   

FNMA, FHLMC and GNMA %

     72      79      86      84      83
(a) Activity relates to loans sold through Non-Agency securitization and loan sale transactions.

The table below details our indemnification and repurchase claim settlement activity during the first six months and the second quarter of 2013 and 2012.

Table 34: Analysis of Residential Mortgage Indemnification and Repurchase Claim Settlement Activity

 

     2013      2012  
Six months ended June 30 – In millions    Unpaid
Principal
Balance (a)
     Losses
Incurred (b)
     Fair Value of
Repurchased
Loans (c)
     Unpaid
Principal
Balance (a)
     Losses
Incurred (b)
     Fair Value of
Repurchased
Loans (c)
 

Residential mortgages (d):

                   

FNMA, FHLMC and GNMA securitizations

   $ 263       $ 153       $ 67       $ 153       $ 89       $ 38   

Private investors (e)

     23         15         3         46         28         4   

Total indemnification and repurchase settlements

   $ 286       $ 168       $ 70       $ 199       $ 117       $ 42   

 

     2013      2012  
Three months ended June 30 – In millions    Unpaid
Principal
Balance (a)
     Losses
Incurred (b)
     Fair Value of
Repurchased
Loans (c)
     Unpaid
Principal
Balance (a)
     Losses
Incurred (b)
     Fair Value of
Repurchased
Loans (c)
 

Residential mortgages (d):

                   

FNMA, FHLMC, and GNMA securitizations

   $ 109       $ 62       $ 33       $ 103       $ 60       $ 25   

Private investors (e)

     13         10         1         25         17         1   

Total indemnification and repurchase settlements

   $ 122       $ 72       $ 34       $ 128       $ 77       $ 26   
(a) Represents unpaid principal balance of loans at the indemnification or repurchase date. Excluded from these balances are amounts associated with pooled settlement payments as loans are typically not repurchased in these transactions.
(b) Represents both i) amounts paid for indemnification/settlement payments and ii) the difference between loan repurchase price and fair value of the loan at the repurchase date. These losses are charged to the indemnification and repurchase liability.
(c) Represents fair value of loans repurchased only as we have no exposure to changes in the fair value of loans or underlying collateral when indemnification/settlement payments are made to investors.
(d) Repurchase activity associated with insured loans, government-guaranteed loans and loans repurchased through the exercise of our removal of account provision (ROAP) option are excluded from this table. Refer to Note 3 in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in this Report for further discussion of ROAPs.
(e) Activity relates to loans sold through Non-Agency securitizations and loan sale transactions.

 

During 2012 and the first six months of 2013, unresolved and settled investor indemnification and repurchase claims were primarily related to one of the following alleged breaches in representations and warranties: (i) misrepresentation of income, assets or employment; (ii) property evaluation or status issues (e.g., appraisal, title, etc.); (iii) underwriting guideline violations; or (iv) mortgage insurance rescissions. During 2012, FNMA and FHLMC expanded their efforts to reduce their exposure to losses on purchased loans resulting in a dramatic increase in second and third quarter 2012 repurchase claims, primarily on the 2006-2008 vintages, but also on other vintages. Included in this higher volume were repurchase claims made on loans in later stages of default than had previously been observed. For example, in the second quarter of 2012, we experienced repurchase claims on loans which had defaulted more than two years prior to the claim date, which was inconsistent with historical activity. In

December 2012, PNC discussed with FNMA and FHLMC their intentions to further expand their purchased loan review activities in 2013 with a focus on 2004 and 2005 vintages, as well as certain loan modifications and aged default loans not previously reviewed. Based on those discussions, we expected an increase in repurchase claims in 2013 and increased the liability for estimated losses on indemnification and repurchase claims accordingly during the fourth quarter of 2012. Additional discussions with FNMA and FHLMC during the second quarter of 2013 resulted in further refinements to incremental file request expectations, primarily relating to older vintages. As a result, the liability for estimated losses on indemnification and repurchase claims was increased in June 2013 to reflect this expected additional claim activity, despite the fact that the volume of government-sponsored enterprise (GSE) claims in the second quarter of 2013 dropped compared to first quarter of 2013.

 

 

46    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

In addition to the decline in repurchase claim activity in the second quarter of 2013, the level of unresolved claims for residential mortgages is also continuing to decline. This decline is due to an acceleration of settlement activity and a continued high level of claim rescissions.

At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the liability for estimated losses on indemnification and repurchase claims for residential mortgages totaled $523 million and $614 million, respectively. We believe our indemnification and repurchase liability appropriately reflects the estimated probable losses on indemnification and repurchase claims for all residential mortgage loans sold and outstanding as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. In making these estimates, we consider the losses that we expect to incur over the life of the sold loans. See Note 18 Commitments and Guarantees in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Report for additional information.

Indemnification and repurchase liabilities, which are included in Other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, are initially recognized when loans are sold to investors and are subsequently evaluated by management. Initial recognition and subsequent adjustments to the indemnification and repurchase liability for the sold residential mortgage portfolio are recognized in Residential mortgage revenue on the Consolidated Income Statement.

HOME EQUITY REPURCHASE OBLIGATIONS

PNC’s repurchase obligations include obligations with respect to certain brokered home equity loans/lines that were sold to a limited number of private investors in the financial services industry by National City prior to our acquisition of National City. PNC is no longer engaged in the brokered home equity lending business, and our exposure under these loan repurchase obligations is limited to repurchases of the loans sold in these transactions. Repurchase activity associated with brokered home equity lines/loans is reported in the Non-Strategic Assets Portfolio segment. For more information regarding our Home Equity Repurchase Obligations, see the Recourse and Repurchase Obligations portion of the Risk Management section of the Financial Review under Item 7 of our 2012 Form 10-K.

The following table details the unpaid principal balance of our unresolved home equity indemnification and repurchase claims at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

Table 35: Analysis of Home Equity Unresolved Asserted Indemnification and Repurchase Claims

 

In millions    June 30
2013
     Dec. 31
2012
 

Home equity loans/lines:

  

    

Private investors (a)

   $ 18       $ 74   
(a) Activity relates to brokered home equity loans/lines sold through loan sale transactions which occurred during 2005-2007.
 

 

The table below details our home equity indemnification and repurchase claim settlement activity during the first six months and the second quarter of 2013 and 2012.

Table 36: Analysis of Home Equity Indemnification and Repurchase Claim Settlement Activity

 

     2013    2012  
Six months ended June 30 – In millions    Unpaid
Principal
Balance (a)
     Losses
Incurred (b)
     Fair Value of
Repurchased
Loans (c)(d)
   Unpaid
Principal
Balance (a)
     Losses
Incurred (b)
     Fair Value of
Repurchased
Loans (c)
 

Home equity loans/lines:

                   

Private investors – Repurchases (e)

   $ 4       $ 32            $ 16       $ 13       $ 3   

 

     2013    2012  
Three months ended June 30 – In millions    Unpaid
Principal
Balance (a)
     Losses
Incurred (b)
     Fair Value of
Repurchased
Loans (c)(d)
   Unpaid
Principal
Balance (a)
     Losses
Incurred (b)
     Fair Value of
Repurchased
Loans (c)
 

Home equity loans/lines:

                   

Private investors – Repurchases (e)

   $ 2       $ 2            $ 6       $ 5       $ 1   
(a) Represents unpaid principal balance of loans at the indemnification or repurchase date. Excluded from these balances are amounts associated with pooled settlement payments as loans are typically not repurchased in these transactions.
(b) Represents the difference between loan repurchase price and fair value of the loan at the repurchase date. These losses are charged to the indemnification and repurchase liability. Losses incurred in the first six months of 2013 also includes amounts for settlement payments.
(c) Represents fair value of loans repurchased only as we have no exposure to changes in the fair value of loans or underlying collateral when indemnification/settlement payments are made to investors.
(d) Activity was less than $.5 million for both the six months and three months ended June 30, 2013.
(e) Activity relates to brokered home equity loans/lines sold through loan sale transactions which occurred during 2005-2007.

During 2012 and the first six months of 2013, unresolved and settled investor indemnification and repurchase claims were primarily related to one of the following alleged breaches in representations and warranties: (i) misrepresentation of income, assets or employment, (ii) property evaluation or status issues (e.g., appraisal, title, etc.) or (iii) underwriting guideline violations. The lower balance of unresolved indemnification and repurchase claims at June 30, 2013 is attributed to settlement activity in 2013. The lower first six months of 2013 repurchase activity was affected by lower claim activity and lower inventory of claims.

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    47


Table of Contents

An indemnification and repurchase liability for estimated losses for which indemnification is expected to be provided or for loans that are expected to be repurchased was established at the acquisition of National City. Management’s evaluation of these indemnification and repurchase liabilities is based upon trends in indemnification and repurchase claims, actual loss experience, risks in the underlying serviced loan portfolios, current economic conditions and the periodic negotiations that management may enter into with investors to settle existing and potential future claims.

At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the liability for estimated losses on indemnification and repurchase claims for home equity loans/lines was $24 million and $58 million, respectively. We believe our indemnification and repurchase liability appropriately reflects the estimated probable losses on indemnification and repurchase claims for all home equity loans/lines sold and outstanding as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. In making these estimates, we consider the losses that we expect to incur over the life of the sold loans. See Note 18 Commitments and Guarantees in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Report for additional information.

Indemnification and repurchase liabilities, which are included in Other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, are evaluated by management on a quarterly basis. Initial recognition and subsequent adjustments to the indemnification and repurchase liability for home equity loans/lines are recognized in Other noninterest income on the Consolidated Income Statement.

RISK MANAGEMENT

PNC encounters risk as part of the normal course of operating our business. Accordingly, we design risk management processes to help manage these risks.

The Risk Management section included in Item 7 of our 2012 Form 10-K describes our risk management philosophy, appetite, culture, governance, risk identification, controls and monitoring and reporting. Additionally, our 2012 Form 10-K provides an analysis of our key areas of risk: credit, operational, liquidity, market and model. The discussion of market risk is further subdivided into interest rate, trading and equity and other investment risk areas. Our use of financial derivatives as part of our overall asset and liability risk management process is also addressed within the Risk Management section of this Item 7.

The following information updates our 2012 Form 10-K risk management disclosures.

CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT

Credit risk represents the possibility that a customer, counterparty or issuer may not perform in accordance with contractual terms. Credit risk is inherent in the financial services business and results from extending credit to customers, purchasing securities, and entering into financial derivative transactions and certain guarantee contracts. Credit risk is one of our most significant risks. Our processes for managing credit risk are embedded in PNC’s risk culture and in our decision-making processes using a systematic approach whereby credit risks and related exposures are: identified and assessed, managed through specific policies and processes, measured and evaluated against our risk tolerance limits, and reported, along with specific mitigation activities, to management and the board through our governance structure.

ASSET QUALITY OVERVIEW

Asset quality trends for the first six months of 2013 improved from both December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2012, including the impact of alignment with interagency supervisory guidance during the first quarter of 2013, and included the following:

   

Nonperforming loans remained flat from December 31, 2012 at $3.3 billion as of June 30, 2013 and included the impact from the alignment with interagency supervisory guidance for loans and lines of credit related to consumer loans of $426 million that occurred in the first quarter of 2013. The increase in nonperforming loans from this alignment was substantially offset by a reduction in total commercial nonperforming loans, mainly related to commercial real estate, in addition to principal activity within consumer loans.

   

Overall loan delinquencies decreased $944 million, or 25%, from year-end 2012 levels. The reduction was partially due to a decline in total consumer loan delinquencies of $395 million pursuant to alignment with interagency supervisory guidance in which loans were moved from various delinquency categories to either nonperforming or, in the case of loans accounted for under the fair value option, nonaccruing. In addition, government insured residential real estate accruing loans past due 90 days or more declined $324 million, the majority of which were transferred to OREO. Finally, commercial real estate delinquencies decreased $84 million due to improved performance.

   

Second quarter 2013 net charge-offs were $208 million, down 34% from second quarter 2012 net charge-offs of $315 million primarily due to improving credit quality. Six months ending June 30, 2013 net charge-offs were $664 million, up slightly from six months ending June 30, 2012 net charge-offs of $648 million, due to the impact of alignment with interagency supervisory guidance in the first

 

 

48    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents
   

quarter of 2013 as discussed above partially offset by improving credit quality in the second quarter of 2013.

   

Provision for credit losses decreased to $157 million in the second quarter of 2013 compared with $256 million for the second quarter of 2012. Provision for credit losses for the six months ending June 30, 2013 declined to $393 million compared with $441 million for the six months ending June 30, 2012. The declines in the comparisons were driven primarily by overall commercial credit quality improvement.

   

The level of ALLL decreased to $3.8 billion at June 30, 2013 from $4.0 billion at December 31, 2012 and $4.2 billion at June 30, 2012.

NONPERFORMING ASSETS AND LOAN DELINQUENCIES

Nonperforming Assets, including OREO and Foreclosed Assets

Nonperforming assets include nonperforming loans and leases for which ultimate collectability of the full amount of contractual principal and interest is not probable and include troubled debt restructurings (TDRs), OREO and foreclosed assets. Loans held for sale, certain government insured or guaranteed loans, purchased impaired loans and loans accounted for under the fair value option are excluded from nonperforming loans. Additional information regarding our nonperforming loans and nonaccrual policies is included in Note 1 Accounting Policies in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Report. The major categories of nonperforming assets are presented in Table 37: Nonperforming Assets By Type.

Nonperforming assets stayed flat at $3.8 billion between June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. Nonperforming loans increased $67 million to $3.3 billion while OREO and foreclosed assets decreased $83 million to $457 million. The ratio of nonperforming loans to total loans stayed constant at 1.75 % at June 30, 2013 compared to December 31, 2012. The ratio of nonperforming assets to total loans, OREO and foreclosed assets decreased to 1.99% at June 30, 2013 from 2.04% at December 31, 2012.

In the first quarter of 2013, we completed our alignment of certain nonaccrual and charge-off policies consistent with interagency supervisory guidance on practices for loans and lines of credit related to consumer lending. This alignment primarily related to (i) subordinate consumer loans (home

equity loans and lines and residential mortgages) where the first-lien loan was 90 days or more past due, (ii) government guaranteed loans where the guarantee may not result in collection of substantially all contractual principal and interest and (iii) loans with borrowers in bankruptcy. In the first quarter of 2013, nonperforming loans increased by $426 million and net charge-offs increased by $134 million as a result of completing the alignment of the aforementioned policies. Additionally, overall delinquencies decreased $395 million due to loans now being reported as either nonperforming or, in the case of loans accounted for under the fair value option, nonaccruing or having been charged off. The impact of the alignment of the policies was considered in our reserving process in the determination of our ALLL at December 31, 2012. See Table 37: Nonperforming Assets By Type, Table 39: Change in Nonperforming Assets, Table 40: Accruing Loans Past Due 30 To 59 Days, Table 41: Accruing Loans Past Due 60 To 89 Days and Table 42: Accruing Loans Past Due 90 Days Or More for additional information.

At June 30, 2013, TDRs included in nonperforming loans were $1.5 billion, or 46%, of total nonperforming loans compared to $1.6 billion, or 49%, of nonperforming loans as of December 31, 2012. Within consumer nonperforming loans, residential real estate TDRs comprise 53% of total residential real estate nonperforming loans at June 30, 2013, down from 64% at December 31, 2012. Home equity TDRs comprise 59% of home equity nonperforming loans at June 30, 2013, down from 70% at December 31, 2012. The level of TDRs in these portfolios is expected to result in elevated nonperforming loan levels for longer periods because TDRs generally remain in nonperforming status until a borrower has made at least six consecutive months of payments under the modified terms or ultimate resolution occurs. Loans where borrowers have been discharged from personal liability through Chapter 7 bankruptcy and have not formally reaffirmed their loan obligation to PNC are not returned to accrual status.

At June 30, 2013, our largest nonperforming asset was $37 million in the Real Estate, Rental and Leasing Industry and our average nonperforming loans associated with commercial lending were under $1 million. Nine of our ten largest outstanding nonperforming assets are from the commercial lending portfolio and represent 14% and 4% of total commercial lending nonperforming loans and total nonperforming assets, respectively, as of June 30, 2013.

 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    49


Table of Contents

Table 37: Nonperforming Assets By Type

 

In millions    June 30
2013
    December 31
2012
 

Nonperforming loans

      

Commercial lending

      

Commercial

      

Retail/wholesale trade

   $ 63      $ 61   

Manufacturing

     62        73   

Service providers

     110        124   

Real estate related (a)

     163        178   

Financial services

     14        9   

Health care

     24        25   

Other industries

     85        120   

Total commercial

     521        590   

Commercial real estate

      

Real estate projects (b)

     516        654   

Commercial mortgage

     123        153   

Total commercial real estate

     639        807   

Equipment lease financing

     7        13   

Total commercial lending

     1,167        1,410   

Consumer lending (c)

      

Home equity (d)

     1,131        951   

Residential real estate

      

Residential mortgage (d)

     947        824   

Residential construction

     15        21   

Credit card

     4        5   

Other consumer (d)

     57        43   

Total consumer lending

     2,154        1,844   

Total nonperforming loans (e)

     3,321        3,254   

OREO and foreclosed assets

      

Other real estate owned (OREO) (f)

     432        507   

Foreclosed and other assets

     25        33   

Total OREO and foreclosed assets

     457        540   

Total nonperforming assets

   $ 3,778      $ 3,794   

Amount of commercial lending nonperforming loans contractually current as to remaining principal and interest

   $ 319      $ 342   

Percentage of total commercial lending nonperforming loans

     27     24

Amount of TDRs included in nonperforming loans

   $ 1,531      $ 1,589   

Percentage of total nonperforming loans

     46     49

Nonperforming loans to total loans

     1.75     1.75

Nonperforming assets to total loans, OREO and foreclosed assets

     1.99        2.04   

Nonperforming assets to total assets

     1.24        1.24   

Allowance for loan and lease losses to total nonperforming loans (g)

     114        124   
(a) Includes loans related to customers in the real estate and construction industries.
(b) Includes both construction loans and intermediate financing for projects.
(c) Excludes most consumer loans and lines of credit, not secured by residential real estate, which are charged off after 120 to 180 days past due and are not placed on nonperforming status.
(d) Pursuant to alignment with interagency supervisory guidance on practices for loans and lines of credit related to consumer lending in the first quarter of 2013, nonperforming home equity loans increased $214 million, nonperforming residential mortgage loans increased $187 million and nonperforming other consumer loans increased $25 million. Charge-offs have been taken on these loans where the fair value less costs to sell the collateral was less than the recorded investment of the loan and were $134 million.
(e) Nonperforming loans exclude certain government insured or guaranteed loans, loans held for sale, loans accounted for under the fair value option and purchased impaired loans.
(f) OREO excludes $311 million and $380 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, related to residential real estate that was acquired by us upon foreclosure of serviced loans because they are insured by the FHA or guaranteed by the VA.
(g) The allowance for loan and lease losses includes impairment reserves attributable to purchased impaired loans. See Note 7 Allowances for Loan and Lease Losses and Unfunded Loan Commitments and Letters of Credit in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in this Report for additional information.

 

50    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

Table 38 : OREO and Foreclosed Assets

 

In millions    June 30
2013
     December 31
2012
 

Other real estate owned (OREO):

       

Residential properties

   $ 149       $ 167   

Residential development properties

     100         135   

Commercial properties

     183         205   

Total OREO

     432         507   

Foreclosed and other assets

     25         33   

Total OREO and foreclosed assets

   $ 457       $ 540   

Total OREO and foreclosed assets decreased $83 million during the first six months of 2013 from $540 million at December 31, 2012, to $457 million, or 12% of total nonperforming assets, at June 30, 2013. As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, 33% and 31%, respectively, of our OREO and foreclosed assets were comprised of 1-4 family residential properties. The lower level of OREO and foreclosed assets was driven mainly by continued strong sales activity offset slightly by an increase in foreclosures. Excluded from OREO at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, was $311 million and $380 million of residential real estate that was acquired by us upon foreclosure of serviced loans because they are insured by the FHA or guaranteed by the VA.

Table 39: Change in Nonperforming Assets

 

In millions    2013     2012  

January 1

   $ 3,794      $ 4,156   

New nonperforming assets (a)

     1,805        1,983   

Charge-offs and valuation adjustments (b)

     (559     (529

Principal activity, including paydowns and payoffs

     (586     (842

Asset sales and transfers to loans held for sale

     (260     (314

Returned to performing status

     (416     (278

June 30

   $ 3,778      $ 4,176   
(a) New nonperforming assets include $560 million of loans added in the first quarter of 2013 due to the alignment with interagency supervisory guidance on practices for loans and lines of credit related to consumer lending.
(b) Charge-offs and valuation adjustments include $134 million of charge-offs added in the first quarter of 2013 due to the alignment with interagency supervisory guidance discussed in footnote (a) above.

The table above presents nonperforming asset activity for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, nonperforming assets decreased $16 million from $3.8 billion at December 31, 2012, driven primarily by a decrease in commercial lending nonperforming loans and principal activity within consumer, partially offset by increases in consumer lending nonperforming loans due to alignment with interagency supervisory guidance in the first quarter of 2013. Approximately 86% of total nonperforming loans are secured by collateral which would be expected to reduce credit losses and require less reserve in the event of default, and 27% of commercial lending nonperforming loans

are contractually current as to both principal and interest obligations. As of June 30, 2013, commercial nonperforming loans are carried at approximately 61% of their unpaid principal balance, due to charge-offs recorded to date, before consideration of the ALLL. See Note 5 Asset Quality in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Report for additional information on these loans.

Purchased impaired loans are considered performing, even if contractually past due (or if we do not expect to receive payment in full based on the original contractual terms), as we are currently accreting interest income over the expected life of the loans. The accretable yield represents the excess of the expected cash flows on the loans at the measurement date over the carrying value. Generally decreases, other than interest rate decreases for variable rate notes, in the net present value of expected cash flows of individual commercial or pooled purchased impaired loans would result in an impairment charge to the provision for loan losses in the period in which the change is deemed probable. Generally increases in the net present value of expected cash flows of purchased impaired loans would first result in a recovery of previously recorded allowance for loan losses, to the extent applicable, and then an increase to accretable yield for the remaining life of the purchased impaired loans. Total nonperforming loans and assets in the tables above are significantly lower than they would have been due to this accounting treatment for purchased impaired loans. This treatment also results in a lower ratio of nonperforming loans to total loans and a higher ratio of ALLL to nonperforming loans. See Note 6 Purchased Loans in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in this Report for additional information on these loans.

Loan Delinquencies

We regularly monitor the level of loan delinquencies and believe these levels may be a key indicator of loan portfolio asset quality. Measurement of delinquency status is based on the contractual terms of each loan. Loans that are 30 days or more past due in terms of payment are considered delinquent. Loan delinquencies exclude loans held for sale and purchased impaired loans, but include government insured or guaranteed loans and loans accounted for under the fair value option.

Total early stage loan delinquencies (accruing loans past due 30 to 89 days) decreased from $1.4 billion at December 31, 2012, to $1.0 billion at June 30, 2013. The reduction in consumer lending early stage delinquencies was mainly due to the alignment with interagency supervisory guidance in the first quarter of 2013 whereby such loans were classified as either nonperforming or, in the case of loans accounted for under the fair value option, nonaccruing. See Note 1 Accounting Policies in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Report for additional information regarding our nonperforming loan and nonaccrual policies. Commercial lending early stage delinquencies decreased primarily due to improving credit quality.

 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    51


Table of Contents

Accruing loans past due 90 days or more are referred to as late stage delinquencies. These loans are not included in nonperforming loans and continue to accrue interest because they are well secured by collateral, and/or are in the process of collection, or are managed in homogenous portfolios with specified charge-off timeframes adhering to regulatory guidelines. These loans decreased $.6 billion, or 25%, from $2.4 billion at December 31, 2012, to $1.8 billion at June 30, 2013, mainly due to the alignment with interagency supervisory guidance in the first quarter of 2013 in which loans were moved to either nonperforming or, in the case of loans accounted for under the fair value option, nonaccruing. In addition, government insured residential real estate loans declined $324 million, the majority of which were transferred to OREO. The following tables display the delinquency status of our loans at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. Additional information regarding accruing loans past due is included in Note 5 Asset Quality in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Report.

Table 40: Accruing Loans Past Due 30 To 59 Days (a)(b)

 

     Amount      Percentage of Total Outstandings  
Dollars in millions    June 30
2013
     December 31
2012
     June 30
2013
     December 31
2012
 

Commercial

   $ 85       $ 115         .10      .14

Commercial real estate

     66         100         .35         .54   

Equipment lease financing

     2         17         .03         .23   

Home equity

     76         117         .21         .33   

Residential real estate

             

Non government insured

     120         151         .81         .99   

Government insured

     110         127         .74         .83   

Credit card

     27         34         .65         .79   

Other consumer

             

Non government insured

     52         65         .25         .30   

Government insured

     148         193         .70         .90   

Total

   $ 686       $ 919         .36         .49   
(a) See note (a) at Table 42: Accruing Loans Past Due 90 Days Or More.
(b) See note (b) at Table 42: Accruing Loans Past Due 90 Days Or More.

Table 41: Accruing Loans Past Due 60 To 89 Days (a)(b)

 

     Amount      Percentage of Total Outstandings  
Dollars in millions    June 30
2013
     December 31
2012
     June 30
2013
     December 31
2012
 

Commercial

   $ 53       $ 55         .06      .07

Commercial real estate

     22         57         .12         .31   

Equipment lease financing

     4         1         .05         .01   

Home equity

     29         58         .08         .16   

Residential real estate

             

Non government insured

     29         49         .20         .32   

Government insured

     79         97         .53         .64   

Credit card

     19         23         .46         .53   

Other consumer

             

Non government insured

     14         21         .07         .10   

Government insured

     100         110         .47         .51   

Total

   $ 349       $ 471         .18         .25   
(a) See note (a) at Table 42: Accruing Loans Past Due 90 Days Or More.
(b) See note (b) at Table 42: Accruing Loans Past Due 90 Days Or More.

 

52    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

Table 42: Accruing Loans Past Due 90 Days Or More (a)(b)

 

     Amount      Percentage of Total Outstandings  
Dollars in millions    June 30
2013
     December 31
2012
     June 30
2013
     December 31
2012
 

Commercial

   $ 31       $ 42         .04      .05

Commercial real estate

        15            .08   

Equipment lease financing

        2            .03   

Residential real estate

             

Non government insured

     50         46         .34         .30   

Government insured

     1,326         1,855         8.97         12.17   

Credit card

     33         36         .80         .84   

Other consumer

             

Non government insured

     12         18         .06         .08   

Government insured

     310         337         1.46         1.57   

Total

   $ 1,762       $ 2,351         .93         1.26   
(a) Amounts in table represent recorded investment.
(b) Pursuant to alignment with interagency supervisory guidance on practices for loans and lines of credit related to consumer lending in the first quarter of 2013, accruing consumer loans past due 30 – 59 days decreased $44 million, accruing consumer loans past due 60 – 89 days decreased $36 million and accruing consumer loans past due 90 days or more decreased $315 million, of which $295 million related to residential real estate government insured loans. As part of this alignment, these loans were moved into nonaccrual status.

 

On a regular basis our Special Asset Committee closely monitors loans, primarily commercial loans, that are not included in the nonperforming or accruing past due categories and for which we are uncertain about the borrower’s ability to comply with existing repayment terms over the next six months. These loans totaled $.2 billion at both June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

Home Equity Loan Portfolio

Our home equity loan portfolio totaled $36.4 billion as of June 30, 2013, or 19% of the total loan portfolio. Of that total, $22.5 billion, or 62%, was outstanding under primarily variable-rate home equity lines of credit and $13.9 billion, or 38%, consisted of closed-end home equity installment loans. Approximately 3% of the home equity portfolio was on nonperforming status as of June 30, 2013.

As of June 30, 2013, we are in an originated first lien position for approximately 46% of the total portfolio and, where originated as a second lien, we currently hold or service the first lien position for approximately an additional 2% of the portfolio. Historically, we have originated and sold first lien residential real estate mortgages which resulted in a low percentage of home equity loans where we hold the first lien

mortgage position. The remaining 52% of the portfolio was secured by second liens where we do not hold the first lien position. For the majority of the home equity portfolio where we are in, hold or service the first lien position, the credit performance of this portion of the portfolio is superior to the portion of the portfolio where we hold the second lien position but do not hold the first lien.

Lien position information is generally based upon original LTV at the time of origination. However, after origination PNC is not typically notified when a senior lien position that is not held by PNC is satisfied. Therefore, information about the current lien status of junior lien loans is less readily available in cases where PNC does not also hold the senior lien. Additionally, PNC is not typically notified when a junior lien position is added after origination of a PNC first lien. This updated information for both junior and senior liens must be obtained from external sources and therefore PNC has contracted with an industry leading third-party service provider to obtain updated loan, lien and collateral data that is aggregated from public and private sources. In the first quarter of 2013, PNC further refined our process to include additional validation efforts around the use of third-party data.

 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    53


Table of Contents

We track borrower performance monthly, including obtaining original LTVs, updated FICO scores at least quarterly, updated LTVs semi-annually, and other credit metrics at least quarterly, including the historical performance of any mortgage loans regardless of lien position that we may or may not hold. This information is used for internal reporting and risk management. For internal reporting and risk management we also segment the population into pools based on product type (e.g., home equity loans, brokered home equity loans, home equity lines of credit, brokered home equity lines of credit). As part of our overall risk analysis and monitoring, we segment the home equity portfolio based upon the delinquency, modification status and bankruptcy status of these loans, as well as the delinquency, modification status and bankruptcy status of any mortgage loan with the same borrower (regardless of whether it is a first lien senior to our second lien).

In establishing our ALLL for non-impaired loans, we utilize a delinquency roll-rate methodology for pools of loans. In accordance with accounting principles, under this methodology, we establish our allowance based upon incurred losses and not lifetime expected losses. We also consider the incremental impact to ALLL when home equity lines of credit transition from interest only product to principal and interest product. The roll-rate methodology estimates transition/roll of loan balances from one delinquency state (e.g., 30-59 days past due) to another delinquency state (e.g., 60-89 days past due) and ultimately to charge-off. The roll through to charge-off is based on PNC’s actual loss experience for each type of pool. Since a pool may consist of first and second liens, the charge-off amounts for the pool are proportionate to the composition of first and second liens in the pool. Our experience has been that the ratio of first to second lien loans has been consistent over time and is appropriately represented in our pools used for roll-rate calculations.

Generally, our variable-rate home equity lines of credit have either a seven or ten year draw period, followed by a 20 year amortization term. During the draw period, we have home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay interest only and home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay principal and interest. The risk associated with our home equity lines of credit end of period draw dates is considered in establishing our ALLL. Based upon outstanding balances at June 30, 2013, the following table presents the periods when home equity lines of credit draw periods are scheduled to end.

Table 43: Home Equity Lines of Credit – Draw Period End Dates

 

In millions    Interest Only
Product
     Principal and
Interest Product
 

Remainder of 2013

   $ 1,191       $ 132   

2014

     1,906         448   

2015

     1,878         620   

2016

     1,469         477   

2017

     2,832         659   

2018 and thereafter

     5,378         5,031   

Total (a)

   $ 14,654       $ 7,367   
(a) Includes approximately $218 million, $199 million, $203 million, $57 million, $65 million and $597 million of home equity lines of credit with balloon payments with draw periods scheduled to end in the remainder of 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 and thereafter, respectively.

We view home equity lines of credit where borrowers are paying principal and interest under the draw period as less risky than those where the borrowers are paying interest only, as these borrowers have a demonstrated ability to make some level of principal and interest payments.

Based upon outstanding balances, and excluding purchased impaired loans, at June 30, 2013, for home equity lines of credit for which the borrower can no longer draw (e.g., draw period has ended or borrowing privileges have been terminated), approximately 3.53% were 30-89 days past due and approximately 5.64% were greater than or equal to 90 days past due. Generally, when a borrower becomes 60 days past due we terminate borrowing privileges and those privileges are not subsequently reinstated. At that point, we continue our collection/recovery processes, which may include a loss mitigation loan modification resulting in a loan that is classified as a TDR.

See Note 5 Asset Quality in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Report for additional information.

 

 

54    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

LOAN MODIFICATIONS AND TROUBLED DEBT RESTRUCTURINGS

Consumer Loan Modifications

We modify loans under government and PNC-developed programs based upon our commitment to help eligible homeowners and borrowers avoid foreclosure, where appropriate. Initially, a borrower is evaluated for a modification under a government program. If a borrower does not qualify under a government program, the borrower is then evaluated under a PNC program. Our programs utilize both temporary and permanent modifications and typically reduce the interest rate, extend the term and/or defer principal. Temporary and permanent modifications under programs involving a change to loan terms are generally classified as TDRs. Further, certain payment plans and trial payment arrangements which do not include a contractual change to loan terms may be classified as TDRs. Additional detail on TDRs is discussed below as well as in Note 5 Asset Quality in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Report.

A temporary modification, with a term between 3 and 60 months, involves a change in original loan terms for a period of time and reverts to a calculated exit rate for the remaining term of the loan as of a specific date. A permanent modification, with a term greater than 60 months, is a modification in which the terms of the original loan are

changed. Permanent modifications primarily include the government-created Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) or PNC-developed HAMP-like modification programs.

For home equity lines of credit we will enter into a temporary modification when the borrower has indicated a temporary hardship and a willingness to bring current the delinquent loan balance. Examples of this situation often include delinquency due to illness or death in the family or loss of employment. The majority of these modifications involve periods of three to 24 months. Permanent modifications are entered into when it is confirmed that the borrower does not possess the income necessary to continue making loan payments at the current amount, but our expectation is that payments at lower amounts can be made.

We also monitor the success rates and delinquency status of our loan modification programs to assess their effectiveness in serving our customers’ needs while mitigating credit losses. Table 44: Consumer Real Estate Related Loan Modifications provides the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified consumer real estate related loans and Table 45: Consumer Real Estate Related Loan Modifications Re-Default by Vintage provides the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified loans that were 60 days or more past due as of six months, nine months, twelve months and fifteen months after the modification date.

 

 

Table 44: Consumer Real Estate Related Loan Modifications

 

     June 30, 2013      December 31, 2012  
Dollars in millions    Number of
Accounts
    

Unpaid

Principal

Balance

    

Number of

Accounts

     Unpaid
Principal
Balance
 

Home equity

             

Temporary Modifications

     7,744       $ 646         9,187       $ 785   

Permanent Modifications

     9,716         730         7,457         535   

Total home equity

     17,460         1,376         16,644         1,320   

Residential Mortgages

             

Permanent Modifications

     8,933         1,652         9,151         1,676   

Non-Prime Mortgages

             

Permanent Modifications

     4,390         622         4,449         629   

Residential Construction

             

Permanent Modifications

     2,053         630         1,735         609   

Total Consumer Real Estate Related Loan Modifications

     32,836       $ 4,280         31,979       $ 4,234   

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    55


Table of Contents

Table 45: Consumer Real Estate Related Loan Modifications Re-Default by Vintage (a) (b)

 

     Six Months     Nine Months     Twelve Months     Fifteen Months         

June 30, 2013

Dollars in thousands

   Number of
Accounts
Re-defaulted
    

% of

Vintage

Re-defaulted

   

Number of

Accounts

Re-defaulted

    

% of

Vintage

Re-defaulted

   

Number of

Accounts

Re-defaulted

    

% of

Vintage

Re-defaulted

   

Number of

Accounts

Re-defaulted

    

% of

Vintage

Re-defaulted

   

Unpaid

Principal

Balance (c)

 

Permanent Modifications

  

                     

Home Equity

                        

Fourth Quarter 2012

     38         3.0                  $ 4,114   

Third Quarter 2012

     48         3.0        75         4.6               7,293   

Second Quarter 2012

     35         2.0        59         3.3        73         4.1          5,262   

First Quarter 2012

     24         2.2        42         3.8        47         4.2        52         4.7     3,371   

Fourth Quarter 2011

     9         2.0        17         3.8        24         5.3        25         5.5        1,797   

Residential Mortgages

                        

Fourth Quarter 2012

     127         17.5                       22,350   

Third Quarter 2012

     219         22.5        260         26.7                  43,799   

Second Quarter 2012

     182         17.4        310         29.6        319         30.5             52,455   

First Quarter 2012

     166         16.3        218         21.4        293         28.7        319         31.2        51,617   

Fourth Quarter 2011

     183         20.3        245         27.2        275         30.5        346         38.4        51,456   

Non-Prime Mortgages

                        

Fourth Quarter 2012

     25         21.4                       3,498   

Third Quarter 2012

     30         21.0        36         25.2                  5,534   

Second Quarter 2012

     37         19.3        55         28.7        66         34.4             7,935   

First Quarter 2012

     41         18.9        52         24.0        69         31.8        71         32.7        9,912   

Fourth Quarter 2011

     36         14.0        56         21.7        78         30.2        90         34.9        11,642   

Residential Construction

  

                     

Fourth Quarter 2012

     3         1.7                       418   

Third Quarter 2012

     3         1.3        1         0.4                  405   

Second Quarter 2012 (d)

                  1         0.8        2         1.7             170   

First Quarter 2012

     2         1.6        5         3.9        6         4.7        6         4.7        2,141   

Fourth Quarter 2011

     5         5.6        7         7.8        13         14.4        12         13.3        3,000   

Temporary Modifications

  

                     

Home Equity

                        

Fourth Quarter 2012

     6         5.7                  $ 574   

Third Quarter 2012

     17         10.4        24         14.7               1,745   

Second Quarter 2012

     29         10.1        35         12.2        46         16.0          3,788   

First Quarter 2012

     32         7.0        43         9.5        57         12.5        62         13.6     4,632   

Fourth Quarter 2011

     26         5.3        39         7.9        51         10.4        55         11.2        4,498   
(a) An account is considered in re-default if it is 60 days or more delinquent after modification. The data in this table represents loan modifications completed during the quarters ending December 31, 2011 through December 31, 2012 and represents a vintage look at all quarterly accounts and the number of those modified accounts (for each quarterly vintage) 60 days or more delinquent at six, nine, twelve, and fifteen months after modification. Account totals include active and inactive accounts that were delinquent when they achieved inactive status. Accounts that are no longer 60 days or more delinquent, or were re-modified since prior period, are removed from re-default status in the period they are cured or re-modified.
(b) Vintage refers to the quarter in which the modification occurred.
(c) Reflects June 30, 2013 unpaid principal balances of the re-defaulted accounts for the Fourth Quarter 2012 Vintage at Six Months, for the Third Quarter 2012 Vintage at Nine Months, for the Second Quarter 2012 Vintage at Twelve Months, and for the First Quarter 2012 and prior Vintages at Fifteen Months.
(d) There were no Residential Construction modified loans which became six months past due in the second quarter of 2012.

 

56    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

In addition to temporary loan modifications, we may make available to a borrower a payment plan or a HAMP trial payment period. Under a payment plan or a HAMP trial payment period, there is no change to the loan’s contractual terms so the borrower remains legally responsible for payment of the loan under its original terms.

Payment plans may include extensions, re-ages and/or forbearance plans. All payment plans bring an account current once certain requirements are achieved and are primarily intended to demonstrate a borrower’s renewed willingness and ability to re-pay. Due to the short term nature of the payment plan there is a minimal impact to the ALLL.

Under a HAMP trial payment period, we establish an alternate payment, generally at an amount less than the contractual payment amount, for the borrower during this short time period. This allows a borrower to demonstrate successful payment performance before permanently restructuring the loan into a HAMP modification. Subsequent to successful borrower performance under the trial payment period, we will capitalize the original contractual amount past due and restructure the loan’s contractual terms, along with bringing the restructured account to current. As the borrower is often already delinquent at the time of participation in the HAMP trial payment period, there is not a significant increase in the ALLL. If the trial payment period is unsuccessful, the loan will be evaluated for further action based upon our existing policies.

Residential conforming and certain residential construction loans have been permanently modified under HAMP or, if they do not qualify for a HAMP modification, under PNC-developed programs, which in some cases may operate similarly to HAMP. These programs first require a reduction of the interest rate followed by an extension of term and, if appropriate, deferral of principal payments. As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, 5,125 accounts with a balance of $.8 billion and 4,188 accounts with a balance of $.6 billion, respectively, of residential real estate loans had been modified under HAMP and were still outstanding on our balance sheet.

We do not re-modify a defaulted modified loan except for subsequent significant life events, as defined by the OCC. A re-modified loan continues to be classified as a TDR for the remainder of its term regardless of subsequent payment performance.

Commercial Loan Modifications and Payment Plans

Modifications of terms for commercial loans are based on individual facts and circumstances. Commercial loan modifications may involve reduction of the interest rate, extension of the term of the loan and/or forgiveness of principal. Modified commercial loans are usually already nonperforming prior to modification. We evaluate these modifications for TDR classification based upon whether we granted a concession to a borrower experiencing financial

difficulties. Additional detail on TDRs is discussed below as well as in Note 5 Asset Quality in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in this Report.

Beginning in 2010, we established certain commercial loan modification and payment programs for small business loans, Small Business Administration loans, and investment real estate loans. As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, $57 million and $68 million, respectively, in loan balances were covered under these modification and payment plan programs. Of these loan balances, $19 million and $24 million have been determined to be TDRs as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

Troubled Debt Restructurings

A TDR is a loan whose terms have been restructured in a manner that grants a concession to a borrower experiencing financial difficulties. TDRs result from borrowers that have been discharged from personal liability through Chapter 7 bankruptcy and have not formally reaffirmed their loan obligations to PNC. Additionally, TDRs result from our loss mitigation activities and include rate reductions, principal forgiveness, postponement/reduction of scheduled amortization and extensions, which are intended to minimize economic loss and to avoid foreclosure or repossession of collateral. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, $1.7 billion of loans held for sale, loans accounted for under the fair value option and pooled purchased impaired loans, as well as certain consumer government insured or guaranteed loans, were excluded from the TDR population. The comparable amount for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $1.6 billion.

Table 46: Summary of Troubled Debt Restructurings

 

In millions   

June 30

2013

    

December 31

2012

 

Consumer lending:

       

Real estate-related

   $ 1,982       $ 2,028   

Credit card (a)

     208         233   

Other consumer

     53         57   

Total consumer lending

     2,243         2,318   

Total commercial lending

     599         541   

Total TDRs

   $ 2,842       $ 2,859   

Nonperforming

   $ 1,531       $ 1,589   

Accruing (b)

     1,103         1,037   

Credit card (a)

     208         233   

Total TDRs

   $ 2,842       $ 2,859   
(a) Includes credit cards and certain small business and consumer credit agreements whose terms have been restructured and are TDRs. However, since our policy is to exempt these loans from being placed on nonaccrual status as permitted by regulatory guidance as generally these loans are directly charged off in the period that they become 180 days past due, these loans are excluded from nonperforming loans.
(b) Accruing loans have demonstrated a period of at least six months of performance under the restructured terms and are excluded from nonperforming loans. Loans where borrowers have been discharged from personal liability through Chapter 7 bankruptcy and have not formally reaffirmed their loan obligation to PNC are not returned to accrual status.
 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    57


Table of Contents

Total TDRs decreased $17 million, or 1%, during the first six months of 2013. Nonperforming TDRs totaled $1.5 billion, which represents approximately 46% of total nonperforming loans.

TDRs that have returned to performing (accruing) status are excluded from nonperforming loans. Generally, these loans have been returned to performing status as the borrowers are performing under the restructured terms for at least six consecutive months. These TDRs increased $66 million, or 6%, during the first six months of 2013 to $1.1 billion as of June 30, 2013. This increase reflects the further seasoning and performance of the TDRs. Loans where borrowers have been discharged from personal liability through Chapter 7 bankruptcy and have not formally reaffirmed their loan obligation to PNC are not returned to accrual status. See Note 5 Asset Quality in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in this Report for additional information.

ALLOWANCES FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES AND UNFUNDED LOAN COMMITMENTS AND LETTERS OF CREDIT

We recorded $664 million in net charge-offs for the first six months of 2013, compared to $648 million in the first six months of 2012. Commercial lending net charge-offs decreased from $189 million in the first six months of 2012 to $151 million in the first six months of 2013. Consumer lending net charge-offs increased from $459 million in the first six months of 2012 to $513 million in the first six months of 2013.

Table 47: Loan Charge-Offs And Recoveries

 

Six months ended June 30

Dollars in millions

   Charge-offs      Recoveries     

Net

Charge-offs /
(Recoveries)

   

Percent of

Average Loans

(annualized)

 

2013

            

Commercial

   $ 195       $ 129       $ 66        .16

Commercial real estate

     137         46         91        .97   

Equipment lease financing

     4         10         (6     (.17

Home equity

     286         37         249        1.39   

Residential real estate

     122            122        1.64   

Credit card

     95         11         84        4.13   

Other consumer

     86         28         58        .55   

Total

   $ 925       $ 261       $ 664        .71   

2012

            

Commercial

   $ 234       $ 147       $ 87        .24

Commercial real estate

     159         52         107        1.22   

Equipment lease financing

     10         15         (5     (.16

Home equity

     252         30         222        1.28   

Residential real estate

     67            67        .87   

Credit card

     110         11         99        4.95   

Other consumer

     97         26         71        .73   

Total

   $ 929       $ 281       $ 648        .76   

 

For the first six months of 2013, loan charge-offs were $925 million and annualized net charge-offs to average loans was 0.71%. Pursuant to alignment with interagency guidance on practices for loans and lines of credit related to consumer lending in the first quarter of 2013, additional charge-offs of $134 million were taken.

In addition, total net charge-offs are lower than they would have been otherwise due to the accounting treatment for purchased impaired loans. This treatment also results in a lower ratio of net charge-offs to average loans. See Note 6 Purchased Loans in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Report for additional information on net charge-offs related to these loans.

We maintain an ALLL to absorb losses from the loan and lease portfolio and determine this allowance based on quarterly assessments of the estimated probable credit losses incurred in the loan and lease portfolio. We maintain the ALLL at a level that we believe to be appropriate to absorb estimated probable credit losses incurred in the loan and lease portfolio as of the balance sheet date. The reserve calculation and determination process is dependent on the use of key assumptions. Key reserve assumptions and estimation processes react to and are influenced by observed changes in loan and lease portfolio performance experience, the financial strength of the borrower, and economic conditions. Key reserve assumptions are periodically updated.

 

 

58    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

We establish specific allowances for loans considered impaired using methods prescribed by GAAP. All impaired loans are subject to individual analysis, except leases and large groups of smaller-balance homogeneous loans which may include, but are not limited to, credit card, residential mortgage and consumer installment loans. Specific allowances for individual loans (including commercial and consumer TDRs) are determined based on an analysis of the present value of expected future cash flows from the loans discounted at their effective interest rate, observable market price or the fair value of the underlying collateral.

Reserves allocated to non-impaired commercial loan classes are based on PD and LGD credit risk ratings.

Our commercial pool reserve methodology is sensitive to changes in key risk parameters such as PD and LGD; the results of these parameters are then applied to the loan balance to determine the amount of the reserve. In general, a given change in any of the major risk parameters will have a corresponding change in the pool reserve allocations for non-impaired commercial loans.

The majority of the commercial portfolio is secured by collateral, including loans to asset-based lending customers that continue to show demonstrably lower LGD. Further, the large investment grade or equivalent portion of the loan portfolio has performed well and has not been subject to significant deterioration. Additionally, guarantees on loans greater than $1 million and owner guarantees for small business loans do not significantly impact our ALLL.

Allocations to non-impaired consumer loan classes are based upon a roll-rate model which uses statistical relationships, calculated from historical data that estimate the movement of loan outstandings through the various stages of delinquency and ultimately charge-off.

A portion of the ALLL related to qualitative and measurement factors has been assigned to loan categories. These factors may include, but are not limited to, the following:

   

Industry concentrations and conditions,

   

Recent credit quality trends,

   

Recent loss experience in particular portfolios,

   

Recent macro-economic factors,

   

Model imprecision,

   

Changes in lending policies and procedures,

   

Timing of available information, including the performance of first lien positions, and

   

Limitations of available historical data.

Purchased impaired loans are initially recorded at fair value and applicable accounting guidance prohibits the carry over or creation of valuation allowances at acquisition. Because the initial fair values of these loans already reflect a credit

component, additional reserves are established when performance is expected to be worse than our expectations as of the acquisition date. At June 30, 2013, we had established reserves of $1.1 billion for purchased impaired loans. In addition, all loans (purchased impaired and non-impaired) acquired in the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition were recorded at fair value. No allowance for loan losses was carried over and no allowance was created at acquisition. See Note 6 Purchased Loans in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in this Report for additional information.

In addition to the ALLL, we maintain an allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit. We report this allowance as a liability on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. We maintain the allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit at a level we believe is appropriate to absorb estimated probable losses on these unfunded credit facilities. We determine this amount using estimates of the probability of the ultimate funding and losses related to those credit exposures. Other than the estimation of the probability of funding, this methodology is very similar to the one we use for determining our ALLL.

We refer you to Note 5 Asset Quality and Note 7 Allowances for Loan and Lease Losses and Unfunded Loan Commitments and Letters of Credit in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Report for further information on key asset quality indicators that we use to evaluate our portfolio and establish the allowances.

Table 48: Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

 

Dollars in millions    2013     2012  

January 1

   $ 4,036      $ 4,347   

Total net charge-offs

     (664     (648

Provision for credit losses

     393        441   

Net change in allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit

     8        16   

Other

     (1        

June 30

   $ 3,772      $ 4,156   

Net charge-offs to average loans (for the six months ended) (annualized) (a)

     .71     .76

Allowance for loan and lease losses to total loans

     1.99        2.30   

Commercial lending net charge-offs

   $ (151   $ (189

Consumer lending net charge-offs

     (513     (459

Total net charge-offs

   $ (664   $ (648

Net charge-offs to average loans (for the six months ended) (annualized)

      

Commercial lending

     .27     .39

Consumer lending (a)

     1.35        1.25   
(a) Pursuant to alignment with interagency guidance on practices for loans and lines of credit related to consumer lending in the first quarter of 2013, additional charge-offs of $134 million have been taken.
 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    59


Table of Contents

As further described in the Consolidated Income Statement Review section of this Report, the provision for credit losses totaled $393 million for the first six months of 2013 compared to $441 million for the first six months of 2012. For the first six months of 2013, the provision for commercial lending credit losses decreased by $60 million, or 68%, from the first six months of 2012. The provision for consumer lending credit losses increased $12 million, or 3%, from the first six months of 2012.

At June 30, 2013, total ALLL to total nonperforming loans was 114%. The comparable amount for December 31, 2012 was 124%. These ratios are 71% and 79%, respectively, when excluding the $1.4 billion and $1.5 billion, respectively, of ALLL at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 allocated to consumer loans and lines of credit not secured by residential real estate and purchased impaired loans. We have excluded consumer loans and lines of credit not secured by real estate as they are charged off after 120 to 180 days past due and not placed on nonperforming status. Additionally, we have excluded purchased impaired loans as they are considered performing regardless of their delinquency status as interest is accreted based on our estimate of expected cash flows and additional allowance is recorded when these cash flows are below recorded investment. See Table 37: Nonperforming Assets By Type within this Credit Risk Management section for additional information.

The ALLL balance increases or decreases across periods in relation to fluctuating risk factors, including asset quality trends, charge-offs and changes in aggregate portfolio balances. During the first six months of 2013, improving asset quality trends, including, but not limited to, delinquency status and improving economic conditions, realization of previously estimated losses through charge-offs, including the impact of alignment with interagency guidance and overall portfolio growth, combined to result in the ALLL balance declining $.2 billion, or 5% to $3.8 billion as of June 30, 2013 compared to December 31, 2012.

See Note 7 Allowances for Loan and Lease Losses and Unfunded Loan Commitments and Letters of Credit and Note 6 Purchased Loans in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1of this Report regarding changes in the ALLL and in the allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit.

LIQUIDITY RISK MANAGEMENT

Liquidity risk has two fundamental components. The first is potential loss assuming we were unable to meet our funding requirements at a reasonable cost. The second is the potential inability to operate our businesses because adequate contingent liquidity is not available in a stressed environment. We manage liquidity risk at the consolidated company level (bank, parent company, and nonbank subsidiaries combined) to help ensure that we can obtain cost-effective funding to meet current and future obligations under both normal “business as usual” and stressful circumstances, and to help ensure that we maintain an appropriate level of contingent liquidity.

Spot and forward funding gap analyses are used to measure and monitor consolidated liquidity risk. Funding gaps represent the difference in projected sources of liquidity available to offset projected uses. We calculate funding gaps for the overnight, thirty-day, ninety-day, one hundred eighty-day and one-year time intervals. Management also monitors liquidity through a series of early warning indicators that may indicate a potential market, or PNC-specific, liquidity stress event. Finally, management performs a set of liquidity stress tests and maintains a contingency funding plan to address a potential liquidity crisis. In the most severe liquidity stress simulation, we assume that PNC’s liquidity position is under pressure, while the market in general is under systemic pressure. The simulation considers, among other things, the impact of restricted access to both secured and unsecured external sources of funding, accelerated run-off of customer deposits, valuation pressure on assets and heavy demand to fund contingent obligations. Risk limits are established within our Liquidity Risk Policy. Management’s Asset and Liability Committee regularly reviews compliance with the established limits.

Parent company liquidity guidelines are designed to help ensure that sufficient liquidity is available to meet our parent company obligations over the succeeding 24-month period. Risk limits for parent company liquidity are established within our Enterprise Capital and Liquidity Management Policy. The Board of Directors’ Risk Committee regularly reviews compliance with the established limits.

BANK LEVEL LIQUIDITY – USES

Obligations requiring the use of liquidity can generally be characterized as either contractual or discretionary. At the bank level, primary contractual obligations include funding loan commitments, satisfying deposit withdrawal requests and maturities and debt service related to bank borrowings. As of June 30, 2013, there were approximately $13.5 billion of bank borrowings with contractual maturities of less than one year. We also maintain adequate bank liquidity to meet future potential loan demand and provide for other business needs, as necessary. See the Bank Level Liquidity – Sources section below.

 

 

60    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

On March 15, 2013 we redeemed $375 million of REIT preferred securities issued by PNC Preferred Funding Trust III with a current distribution rate of 8.7%.

BANK LEVEL LIQUIDITY – SOURCES

Our largest source of bank liquidity on a consolidated basis is the deposit base that comes from our retail and commercial businesses. Total deposits decreased to $212.3 billion at June 30, 2013 from $213.1 billion at December 31, 2012, primarily due to runoff of year-end seasonally higher transactions deposits. Liquid assets and unused borrowing capacity from a number of sources are also available to maintain our liquidity position. Borrowed funds come from a diverse mix of short and long-term funding sources.

At June 30, 2013, our liquid assets consisted of short-term investments (Federal funds sold, resale agreements, trading securities and interest-earning deposits with banks) totaling $7.5 billion and securities available for sale totaling $47.9 billion. Of our total liquid assets of $55.4 billion, we had $23.1 billion pledged as collateral for borrowings, trust, and other commitments. The level of liquid assets fluctuates over time based on many factors, including market conditions, loan and deposit growth and balance sheet management activities.

In addition to the customer deposit base, which has historically provided the single largest source of relatively stable and low-cost funding, the bank also obtains liquidity through the issuance of traditional forms of funding including long-term debt (senior notes and subordinated debt and FHLB advances) and short-term borrowings (Federal funds purchased, securities sold under repurchase agreements, commercial paper issuances and other short-term borrowings).

PNC Bank, N.A. is authorized by its board to offer up to $20 billion in senior and subordinated unsecured debt obligations with maturities of more than nine months. Through June 30, 2013, PNC Bank, N.A. had issued $15.0 billion of debt under this program including the following during 2013:

   

$750 million of fixed rate senior notes with a maturity date of January 28, 2016. Interest is payable semi-annually, at a fixed rate of .80%, on January 28 and July 28 of each year, beginning on July 28, 2013,

   

$250 million of floating rate senior notes with a maturity date of January 28, 2016. Interest is payable at the 3-month LIBOR rate, reset quarterly, plus a spread of .31%, on January 28, April 28, July 28, and October 28 of each year, beginning on April 28, 2013,

   

$750 million of subordinated notes with a maturity date of January 30, 2023. Interest is payable semi-annually, at a fixed rate of 2.950%, on January 30 and July 30 of each year, beginning on July 30, 2013,

   

$1.4 billion of senior extendible floating rate bank notes issued to an affiliate with an initial maturity date of April 14, 2014, subject to the holder’s monthly option to extend, and a final maturity date of

   

January 14, 2015. Interest is payable at the 3-month LIBOR rate, reset quarterly, plus a spread of .225%, which spread is subject to four potential one basis point increases in the event of certain extensions of maturity by the holder. Interest is payable on March 14, June 14, September 14, and December 14 of each year, beginning on June 14, 2013,

   

$645 million of floating rate senior notes with a maturity date of April 29, 2016. Interest is payable at the 3-month LIBOR rate, reset quarterly, plus a spread of .32% on January 29, April 29, July 29 and October 29 of each year, beginning on July 29, 2013, and

   

$800 million of senior extendible floating rate bank notes with an initial maturity date of July 18, 2014, subject to the holder’s monthly option to extend, and a final maturity date of June 18, 2015. Interest is payable at the 3-Month LIBOR rate, reset quarterly, plus a spread of .225%, which spread is subject to four potential one basis point increases in the event of certain extensions of maturity by the holder. Interest is payable on March 20, June 20, September 20 and December 20 of each year, beginning on September 20, 2013.

Total senior and subordinated debt of PNC Bank, N.A. increased to $9.4 billion at June 30, 2013 from $7.6 billion at December 31, 2012 primarily due to $4.6 billion in new borrowing less $2.6 billion in calls and maturities.

PNC Bank, N.A. is a member of the FHLB-Pittsburgh and as such has access to advances from FHLB-Pittsburgh secured generally by residential mortgage and other mortgage-related loans. At June 30, 2013, our unused secured borrowing capacity was $17.2 billion with FHLB-Pittsburgh. Total FHLB borrowings decreased to $8.5 billion at June 30, 2013 from $9.4 billion at December 31, 2012 due to $6 billion in calls and maturities and $5 billion of new issuance.

PNC Bank, N.A. has the ability to offer up to $10.0 billion of its commercial paper to provide additional liquidity. As of June 30, 2013, there was $500 million outstanding under this program. Commercial paper on our Consolidated Balance Sheet also includes $5.9 billion of commercial paper issued by Market Street Funding LLC, a consolidated VIE.

PNC Bank, N.A. can also borrow from the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland’s (Federal Reserve Bank) discount window to meet short-term liquidity requirements. The Federal Reserve Bank, however, is not viewed as the primary means of funding our routine business activities, but rather as a potential source of liquidity in a stressed environment or during a market disruption. These potential borrowings are secured by securities and commercial loans. At June 30, 2013, our unused secured borrowing capacity was $27.3 billion with the Federal Reserve Bank.

 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    61


Table of Contents

See Note 20 Subsequent Events in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements of this Report for information on the issuance of subordinated notes of $750 million on July 25, 2013.

PARENT COMPANY LIQUIDITY – USES

Obligations requiring the use of liquidity can generally be characterized as either contractual or discretionary. The parent company’s contractual obligations consist primarily of debt service related to parent company borrowings and funding non-bank affiliates. As of June 30, 2013, there were approximately $1.4 billion of parent company borrowings with maturities of less than one year.

Additionally, the parent company maintains adequate liquidity to fund discretionary activities such as paying dividends to PNC shareholders, share repurchases, and acquisitions. See the Parent Company Liquidity – Sources section below.

See Supervision and Regulation in Item 1 of this Report for information regarding the Federal Reserve’s CCAR process, including its impact on our ability to take certain capital actions, including plans to pay or increase common stock dividends, reinstate or increase common stock repurchase programs, or redeem preferred stock or other regulatory capital instruments.

On March 14, 2013, we used $1.4 billion of parent company cash to purchase senior extendible floating rate bank notes issued by PNC Bank, N.A.

On March 19, 2013, PNC announced the redemption completed on April 19, 2013 of depositary shares representing interests in PNC’s 9.875% Fixed-To-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series L. Each depositary share represents a 1/4,000th interest in a share of the Series L Preferred Stock. All 6,000,000 depositary shares outstanding were redeemed, as well as all 1,500 shares of Series L Preferred Stock underlying such depositary shares, resulting in a net outflow of $150 million.

On March 22, 2013, we called for the redemption completed on April 23, 2013 of $15 million of trust preferred securities issued by Yardville Capital Trust VI.

On April 8, 2013 we called for redemption completed on May 23, 2013 of the $30 million of trust preferred securities issued by Fidelity Capital Trust III.

On May 1, 2013 we called for redemption completed on June 17, 2013 of the following trust preferred securities:

   

$15 million issued by Sterling Financial Statutory Trust III,

   

$15 million issued by Sterling Financial Statutory Trust IV,

   

$20 million issued by Sterling Financial Statutory Trust V,

   

$30 million issued by MAF Bancorp Capital Trust I, and

   

$8 million issued by James Monroe Statutory Trust III.

See Note 20 Subsequent Events in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements of this Report for information on the redemption of $22 million on July 23, 2013 and a planned redemption of $35 million on September 16, 2013 of trust preferred securities.

PARENT COMPANY LIQUIDITY – SOURCES

The principal source of parent company liquidity is the dividends it receives from its subsidiary bank, which may be impacted by the following:

   

Bank-level capital needs,

   

Laws and regulations,

   

Corporate policies,

   

Contractual restrictions, and

   

Other factors.

There are statutory and regulatory limitations on the ability of national banks to pay dividends or make other capital distributions or to extend credit to the parent company or its non-bank subsidiaries. The amount available for dividend payments by PNC Bank, N.A. to the parent company without prior regulatory approval was approximately $1.1 billion at June 30, 2013. See Note 22 Regulatory Matters in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of our 2012 Form 10-K for a further discussion of these limitations. We provide additional information on certain contractual restrictions under the “Trust Preferred Securities” section of the Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements And Variable Interest Entities section of this Financial Review and in Note 14 Capital Securities of Subsidiary Trusts and Perpetual Trust Securities in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of our 2012 Form 10-K.

In addition to dividends from PNC Bank, N.A., other sources of parent company liquidity include cash and investments, as well as dividends and loan repayments from other subsidiaries and dividends or distributions from equity investments. As of June 30, 2013, the parent company had approximately $4.5 billion in funds available from its cash and investments.

We can also generate liquidity for the parent company and PNC’s non-bank subsidiaries through the issuance of debt securities and equity securities, including certain capital instruments, in public or private markets and commercial paper. We have an effective shelf registration statement pursuant to which we can issue additional debt, equity and other capital instruments. Total senior and subordinated debt and hybrid capital instruments decreased to $10.8 billion at June 30, 2013 from $11.5 billion at December 31, 2012.

The parent company, through its subsidiary PNC Funding Corp, has the ability to offer up to $3.0 billion of commercial

 

 

62    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

paper to provide additional liquidity. As of June 30, 2013, there were no issuances outstanding under this program.

Note 19 Equity in Item 8 of our 2012 Form 10-K describes the 16,885,192 warrants we have outstanding, each to purchase one share of PNC common stock at an exercise price of $67.33 per share. These warrants were sold by the U.S. Treasury in a secondary public offering in May 2010 after the U.S. Treasury exchanged its TARP Warrant. These warrants will expire December 31, 2018.

On May 7, 2013, we issued 500,000 depositary shares, each representing a 1/100th interest in a share of our Fixed-to-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series R, in an underwritten public offering resulting in gross proceeds of $500 million to us before commissions and expenses. We issued 5,000 shares of Series R Preferred Stock to the depositary in this transaction. Non-cumulative cash dividends are payable when, as, and if declared by our board of directors, or an authorized committee of our board, semi-annually on June 1 and December 1 of each year, beginning on December 1, 2013 and ending on June 1, 2023, at a rate of 4.850%. From and including June 1, 2023, such dividends will be payable quarterly on March 1, June 1, September 1 and December 1 of each year beginning on September 1, 2023 at a rate of three-month LIBOR plus 3.04% per annum. The Series R Preferred Stock is redeemable at our option on or

after June 1, 2023 and at our option within 90 days of a regulatory capital treatment event as defined in the designations.

STATUS OF CREDIT RATINGS

The cost and availability of short-term and long-term funding, as well as collateral requirements for certain derivative instruments, is influenced by PNC’s debt ratings.

In general, rating agencies base their ratings on many quantitative and qualitative factors, including capital adequacy, liquidity, asset quality, business mix, level and quality of earnings, and the current legislative and regulatory environment, including implied government support. In addition, rating agencies themselves have been subject to scrutiny arising from the financial crisis and could make or be required to make substantial changes to their ratings policies and practices, particularly in response to legislative and regulatory changes, including as a result of provisions in Dodd-Frank. Potential changes in the legislative and regulatory environment and the timing of those changes could impact our ratings, which as noted above, could impact our liquidity and financial condition. A decrease, or potential decrease, in credit ratings could impact access to the capital markets and/or increase the cost of debt, and thereby adversely affect liquidity and financial condition.

 

 

Table 49: Credit Ratings as of June 30, 2013 for PNC and PNC Bank, N.A.

 

      Moody’s     

Standard &

Poor’s

     Fitch  

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.

          

Senior debt

     A3         A-         A+   

Subordinated debt

     Baa1         BBB+         A   

Preferred stock

     Baa3         BBB         BBB-   
 

PNC Bank, N.A.

          

Subordinated debt

     A3         A-         A   

Long-term deposits

     A2         A         AA-   

Short-term deposits

     P-1         A-1         F1+   

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    63


Table of Contents

Commitments

The following tables set forth contractual obligations and various other commitments as of June 30, 2013 representing required and potential cash outflows.

Table 50: Contractual Obligations

 

             Payment Due By Period  
June 30, 2013 – in millions    Total     

Less than one

year

    

One to three

years

    

Four to five

years

    

After five

years

 

Remaining contractual maturities of time deposits (a)

   $ 25,634       $ 17,824       $ 4,328       $ 1,072       $ 2,410   

Borrowed funds (a) (b)

     39,864         20,308         6,388         5,440         7,728   

Minimum annual rentals on noncancellable leases

     2,735         392         652         476         1,215   

Nonqualified pension and postretirement benefits

     584         96         120         113         255   

Purchase obligations (c)

     765         454         237         48         26   

Total contractual cash obligations

   $ 69,582       $ 39,074       $ 11,725       $ 7,149       $ 11,634   
(a) Includes purchase accounting adjustments.
(b) Includes basis adjustment relating to accounting hedges.
(c) Includes purchase obligations for goods and services covered by noncancellable contracts and contracts including cancellation fees.

 

We had unrecognized tax benefits of $109 million at June 30, 2013. This liability for unrecognized tax benefits represents an estimate of tax positions that we have taken in our tax returns which ultimately may not be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. Since the ultimate amount and timing of any future cash settlements cannot be predicted with reasonable certainty, this estimated liability has been excluded from the contractual obligations table. See Note 16 Income Taxes in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements of this Report for additional information.

Our contractual obligations totaled $71.1 billion at December 31, 2012. The decrease in the comparison is primarily attributable to the decrease in borrowed funds and time deposits. See Funding and Capital Sources in the Consolidated Balance Sheet Review section of this Financial Review for additional information regarding our funding sources.

 

 

Table 51: Other Commitments (a)

 

             Amount Of Commitment Expiration By Period  
June 30, 2013 – in millions   

Total

Amounts

Committed

    

Less than one

year

    

One to three

years

    

Four to five

years

    

After five

years

 

Net unfunded credit commitments

   $ 124,142       $ 51,305       $ 40,591       $ 31,707       $ 539   

Net outstanding standby letters of credit (b)

     10,917         5,066         4,566         1,274         11   

Reinsurance agreements (c)

     5,731         2,954         43         31         2,703   

Other commitments (d)

     909         647         226         34         2   

Total commitments

   $ 141,699       $ 59,972       $ 45,426       $ 33,046       $ 3,255   
(a) Other commitments are funding commitments that could potentially require performance in the event of demands by third parties or contingent events. Loan commitments are reported net of syndications, assignments and participations.
(b) Includes $6.8 billion of standby letters of credit that support remarketing programs for customers’ variable rate demand notes.
(c) Reinsurance agreements are with third-party insurers related to insurance sold to our customers. Balances represent estimates based on availability of financial information.
(d) Includes unfunded commitments related to private equity investments of $171 million that are not on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Also includes commitments related to tax credit investments of $674 million and other direct equity investments of $64 million that are included in Other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Our total commitments totaled $138.8 billion at December 31, 2012. The increase in the comparison is primarily due to an increase in commercial and commercial real estate net unfunded credit commitments.

 

64    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

MARKET RISK MANAGEMENT

Market risk is the risk of a loss in earnings or economic value due to adverse movements in market factors such as interest rates, credit spreads, foreign exchange rates and equity prices. We are exposed to market risk primarily by our involvement in the following activities, among others:

   

Traditional banking activities of taking deposits and extending loans,

   

Equity and other investments and activities whose economic values are directly impacted by market factors, and

   

Fixed income securities, derivatives and foreign exchange activities, as a result of customer activities and underwriting.

We have established enterprise-wide policies and methodologies to identify, measure, monitor and report market risk. Market Risk Management provides independent oversight by monitoring compliance with these limits and

guidelines, and reporting significant risks in the business to the Risk Committee of the Board.

MARKET RISK MANAGEMENT – INTEREST RATE RISK

Interest rate risk results primarily from our traditional banking activities of gathering deposits and extending loans. Many factors, including economic and financial conditions, movements in interest rates and consumer preferences, affect the difference between the interest that we earn on assets and the interest that we pay on liabilities and the level of our noninterest-bearing funding sources. Due to the repricing term mismatches and embedded options inherent in certain of these products, changes in market interest rates not only affect expected near-term earnings, but also the economic values of these assets and liabilities.

Asset and Liability Management centrally manages interest rate risk as prescribed in our risk management policies, which are approved by management’s Asset and Liability Committee and the Risk Committee of the Board.

 

 

 

Sensitivity results and market interest rate benchmarks for the second quarters of 2013 and 2012 follow:

Table 52: Interest Sensitivity Analysis

 

      Second
Quarter
2013
    Second
Quarter
2012
 

Net Interest Income Sensitivity Simulation

      

Effect on net interest income in first year from gradual interest rate change over following 12 months of:

      

100 basis point increase

     1.7     2.5

100 basis point decrease (a)

     (1.0 )%      (1.9 )% 

Effect on net interest income in second year from gradual interest rate change over the preceding 12 months of:

      

100 basis point increase

     6.0     7.9

100 basis point decrease (a)

     (4.5 )%      (5.1 )% 

Duration of Equity Model (a)

      

Base case duration of equity (in years):

     (2.4     (8.2

Key Period-End Interest Rates

      

One-month LIBOR

     .19     .25

Three-year swap

     .82     .62
(a) Given the inherent limitations in certain of these measurement tools and techniques, results become less meaningful as interest rates approach zero.

 

In addition to measuring the effect on net interest income assuming parallel changes in current interest rates, we routinely simulate the effects of a number of nonparallel interest rate environments. The following Net Interest Income Sensitivity to Alternative Rate Scenarios (Second Quarter 2013) table reflects the percentage change in net interest income over the next two 12-month periods assuming (i) the PNC Economist’s most likely rate forecast, (ii) implied market forward rates and (iii) Yield Curve Slope Flattening (a 100 basis point yield curve slope flattening between 1-month and ten-year rates superimposed on current base rates) scenario.

Table 53: Net Interest Income Sensitivity to Alternative Rate Scenarios (Second Quarter 2013)

 

      PNC
Economist
    Market
Forward
     Slope
Flattening
 

First year sensitivity

     (.43 )%      .99      (.74 )% 

Second year sensitivity

     (.17 )%      4.09      (3.21 )% 
 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    65


Table of Contents

All changes in forecasted net interest income are relative to results in a base rate scenario where current market rates are assumed to remain unchanged over the forecast horizon.

When forecasting net interest income, we make assumptions about interest rates and the shape of the yield curve, the volume and characteristics of new business and the behavior of existing on- and off-balance sheet positions. These assumptions determine the future level of simulated net interest income in the base interest rate scenario and the other interest rate scenarios presented in the above table. These simulations assume that as assets and liabilities mature, they are replaced or repriced at then current market rates. We also consider forward projections of purchase accounting accretion when forecasting net interest income.

The following graph presents the LIBOR/Swap yield curves for the base rate scenario and each of the alternate scenarios one year forward.

Table 54: Alternate Interest Rate Scenarios: One Year Forward

 

LOGO

The second quarter 2013 interest sensitivity analyses indicate that our Consolidated Balance Sheet is positioned to benefit from an increase in interest rates and an upward sloping interest rate yield curve. We believe that we have the deposit funding base and balance sheet flexibility to adjust, where appropriate and permissible, to changing interest rates and market conditions.

MARKET RISK MANAGEMENT – TRADING RISK

Our trading activities are primarily customer-driven trading in fixed income securities, derivatives and foreign exchange contracts, as well as the daily mark-to-market impact from the credit valuation adjustment (CVA) on the customer derivatives portfolio. They also include the underwriting of fixed income and equity securities.

We use value-at-risk (VaR) as the primary means to measure and monitor market risk in trading activities. We calculate a diversified VaR at a 95% confidence interval. VaR is used to estimate the probability of portfolio losses based on the statistical analysis of historical market risk factors. A diversified VaR reflects empirical correlations across different asset classes.

During the first six months of 2013, our 95% VaR ranged between $1.9 million and $5.5 million, averaging $4.1 million. During the first six months of 2012, our 95% VaR ranged between $2.5 million and $5.3 million, averaging $3.9 million.

To help ensure the integrity of the models used to calculate VaR for each portfolio and enterprise-wide, we use a process known as backtesting. The backtesting process consists of comparing actual observations of trading-related gains or losses against the VaR levels that were calculated at the close of the prior day. This assumes that market exposures remain constant throughout the day and that recent historical market variability is a good predictor of future variability. Our actual trading-related activity includes customer revenue and intraday hedging which helps to reduce trading losses, and may reduce the number of instances of actual losses exceeding the prior day VaR measure. There were no such instances during the first six months of 2013 under our diversified VaR measure. In comparison, there was two such instance during the first six months of 2012. We use a 500 day look back period for backtesting and include customer related revenue.

The following graph shows a comparison of enterprise-wide trading-related gains and losses against prior day diversified VaR for the period indicated.

Table 55: Enterprise-Wide Trading-Related Gains/Losses Versus Value-at-Risk

 

LOGO

 

 

66    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

Total trading revenue was as follows:

Table 56: Trading Revenue

 

Six months ended June 30

In millions

   2013      2012  

Net interest income

   $ 17       $ 20   

Noninterest income

     144         105   

Total trading revenue

   $ 161       $ 125   

Securities underwriting and trading (a)

   $ 41       $ 43   

Foreign exchange

     42         47   

Financial derivatives and other

     78         35   

Total trading revenue

   $ 161       $ 125   

 

Three months ended June 30

In millions

   2013      2012  

Net interest income

   $ 8       $ 11   

Noninterest income

     93         33   

Total trading revenue

   $ 101       $ 44   

Securities underwriting and trading (a)

   $ 16       $ 18   

Foreign exchange

     23         27   

Financial derivatives and other

     62         (1

Total trading revenue

   $ 101       $ 44   
(a) Includes changes in fair value for certain loans accounted for at fair value.

The trading revenue disclosed above includes results from providing investing, risk management and underwriting services to our customers as well as results from hedges of customer activity. Trading revenue excludes the impact of economic hedging activities which we transact to manage risk primarily related to residential and commercial mortgage servicing rights and residential and commercial mortgage loans held-for-sale. Derivatives used for economic hedges are not designated as accounting hedges because the contracts they are hedging are typically also carried at fair value on the balance sheet, resulting in symmetrical accounting treatment for both the hedging instrument and the hedged item. Economic hedge results, along with the associated hedged items, are reported in the respective income statement line items, as appropriate.

Trading revenues for the first six months of 2013 increased $36 million compared with the first six months of 2012. Trading revenue for the second quarter of 2013 increased $57 million compared with the second quarter of 2012. The increases in both comparisons primarily result from the impact of higher market interest rates on credit valuations related to customer-initiated hedging activities and improved debt underwriting results which were partially offset by reduced client derivatives revenue.

MARKET RISK MANAGEMENT – EQUITY AND OTHER INVESTMENT RISK

Equity investment risk is the risk of potential losses associated with investing in both private and public equity markets. PNC invests primarily in private equity markets. In addition to extending credit, taking deposits, and underwriting and trading financial instruments, we make and manage direct investments in a variety of transactions, including management buyouts, recapitalizations, and growth financings in a variety of industries. We also have investments in affiliated and non-affiliated funds that make similar investments in private equity and in debt and equity-oriented hedge funds. The economic and/or book value of these investments and other assets such as loan servicing rights are directly affected by changes in market factors.

The primary risk measurement for equity and other investments is economic capital. Economic capital is a common measure of risk for credit, market and operational risk. It is an estimate of the potential value depreciation over a one year horizon commensurate with solvency expectations of an institution rated single-A by the credit rating agencies. Given the illiquid nature of many of these types of investments, it can be a challenge to determine their fair values. See Note 9 Fair Value in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in this Report and in our 2012 Form 10-K for additional information.

Various PNC business units manage our equity and other investment activities. Our businesses are responsible for making investment decisions within the approved policy limits and associated guidelines.

A summary of our equity investments follows:

Table 57: Equity Investments Summary

 

In millions    June 30
2013
     Dec. 31
2012
 

BlackRock

   $ 5,713       $ 5,614   

Tax credit investments

     2,175         2,965   

Private equity

     1,729         1,802   

Visa

     204         251   

Other

     233         245   

Total

   $ 10,054       $ 10,877   

BLACKROCK

PNC owned approximately 36 million common stock equivalent shares of BlackRock equity at June 30, 2013, accounted for under the equity method. The primary risk measurement, similar to other equity investments, is economic capital. The Business Segments Review section of this Financial Review includes additional information about BlackRock.

 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    67


Table of Contents

TAX CREDIT INVESTMENTS

Included in our equity investments are tax credit investments which are accounted for under the equity method. These investments, as well as equity investments held by consolidated partnerships, totaled $2.2 billion at June 30, 2013 and $3.0 billion at December 31, 2012. These equity investment balances include unfunded commitments totaling $674 million and $685 million, respectively. These unfunded commitments are included in Other Liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Note 3 Loan Sale and Servicing Activities and Variable Interest Entities in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Report has further information on Tax Credit Investments.

PRIVATE EQUITY

The private equity portfolio is an illiquid portfolio comprised of mezzanine and equity investments that vary by industry, stage and type of investment.

Private equity investments carried at estimated fair value totaled $1.7 billion at June 30, 2013 compared with $1.8 billion at December 31, 2012. As of June 30, 2013, $1.1 billion was invested directly in a variety of companies and $.6 billion was invested indirectly through various private equity funds. Included in direct investments are investment activities of two private equity funds that are consolidated for financial reporting purposes. The noncontrolling interests of these funds totaled $235 million as of June 30, 2013. The interests held in indirect private equity funds are not redeemable, but PNC may receive distributions over the life of the partnership from liquidation of the underlying investments. See Item 1 Business – Supervision and Regulation and Item 1A Risk Factors included in our 2012 Form 10-K for discussion of potential impacts of the Volcker Rule provisions of Dodd-Frank on our holding interests in and sponsorship of private equity or hedge funds.

Our unfunded commitments related to private equity totaled $171 million at June 30, 2013 compared with $182 million at December 31, 2012.

VISA

During second quarter of 2013 we sold 2 million of Visa Class B common shares, in addition to the 9 million shares sold in the second half of 2012, and entered into swap agreements with the purchaser of the shares. See Note 9 Fair Value in this Report and in our 2012 Form 10-K and Note 13 Financial Derivatives in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Report for additional information. At June 30, 2013, our investment in Visa Class B common shares totaled approximately 12 million shares and was recorded at $204 million. Based on the June 30, 2013 closing price of $182.75 for the Visa Class A common shares,

the fair value of our total investment was approximately $950 million at the current conversion rate which reflects adjustments in respect of all litigation funding by Visa to date. The Visa Class B common shares that we own are transferable only under limited circumstances (including those applicable to the sales in the second quarter of 2013 and in the second half of 2012) until they can be converted into shares of the publicly traded class of stock, which cannot happen until the settlement of all of the specified litigation. It is expected that Visa will continue to adjust the conversion rate of Visa Class B common shares to Class A common shares in connection with any settlements of the specified litigation in excess of any amounts then in escrow for that purpose and will also reduce the conversion rate to the extent that it adds any funds to the escrow in the future.

Our 2012 Form 10-K has additional information regarding the October 2007 Visa restructuring, our involvement with judgment and loss sharing agreements with Visa and certain other banks, and the status of pending interchange litigation. See Note 17 Legal Proceedings and Note 18 Commitments and Guarantees in our Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements of this Report for additional information.

OTHER INVESTMENTS

We also make investments in affiliated and non-affiliated funds with both traditional and alternative investment strategies. The economic values could be driven by either the fixed-income market or the equity markets, or both. At June 30, 2013, other investments totaled $233 million compared with $245 million at December 31, 2012. We recognized net gains related to these investments of $25 million and $13 million during the first six months of 2013 and 2012, including net gains of $5 million during the second quarter of 2013 and $2 million loss during second quarter of 2012.

Given the nature of these investments, if market conditions affecting their valuation were to worsen, we could incur future losses.

Our unfunded commitments related to other investments were less than $1 million at June 30, 2013 and $3 million at December 31, 2012.

FINANCIAL DERIVATIVES

We use a variety of financial derivatives as part of the overall asset and liability risk management process to help manage exposure to interest rate, market and credit risk inherent in our business activities. Substantially all such instruments are used to manage risk related to changes in interest rates. Interest rate and total return swaps, interest rate caps and floors, swaptions, options, forwards and futures contracts are the primary instruments we use for interest rate risk management. We also enter into derivatives with customers to facilitate their risk management activities.

 

 

68    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

Financial derivatives involve, to varying degrees, interest rate, market and credit risk. For interest rate swaps and total return swaps, options and futures contracts, only periodic cash payments and, with respect to options, premiums are exchanged. Therefore, cash requirements and exposure to credit risk are significantly less than the notional amount on these instruments.

Further information on our financial derivatives is presented in Note 1 Accounting Policies and Note 9 Fair Value in our Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of our 2012 Form 10-K and in Note 9 Fair Value and Note 13 Financial Derivatives in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Report, which is incorporated here by reference.

Not all elements of interest rate, market and credit risk are addressed through the use of financial or other derivatives, and such instruments may be ineffective for their intended purposes due to unanticipated market changes, among other reasons.

The following table summarizes the notional or contractual amounts and net fair value of financial derivatives at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

Table 58: Financial Derivatives Summary

 

     June 30, 2013     December 31, 2012  
In millions    Notional/
Contractual
Amount
     Net Fair
Value (a)
    Notional/
Contractual
Amount
     Net Fair
Value (a)
 

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under GAAP

                                  

Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments

   $ 33,857       $ 1,051      $ 29,270       $ 1,720   

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under GAAP

            

Total derivatives used for residential mortgage banking activities

   $ 160,604       $ 477      $ 166,819       $ 588   

Total derivatives used for commercial mortgage banking activities

     9,991         (16     4,606         (23

Total derivatives used for customer-related activities

     163,935         74        163,848         30   

Total derivatives used for other risk management activities

     2,261         (331     1,813         (357

Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments

   $ 336,791       $ 204      $ 337,086       $ 238   

Total Derivatives

   $ 370,648       $ 1,255      $ 366,356       $ 1,958   
(a) Represents the net fair value of assets and liabilities.

INTERNAL CONTROLS AND DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

As of June 30, 2013, we performed an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures and of changes in our internal control over financial reporting.

Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) were effective as of June 30, 2013, and that there has been no change in PNC’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second quarter of 2013 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    69


Table of Contents

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

Accretable net interest (Accretable yield) – The excess of cash flows expected to be collected on a purchased impaired loan over the carrying value of the loan. The accretable net interest is recognized into interest income over the remaining life of the loan using the constant effective yield method.

Adjusted average total assets – Primarily comprised of total average quarterly (or annual) assets plus (less) unrealized losses (gains) on investment securities, less goodwill and certain other intangible assets (net of eligible deferred taxes).

Annualized – Adjusted to reflect a full year of activity.

Assets under management – Assets over which we have sole or shared investment authority for our customers/clients. We do not include these assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Basel I Tier 1 common capital – Basel I Tier 1 risk-based capital, less preferred equity, less trust preferred capital securities, and less noncontrolling interests.

Basel I Tier 1 common capital ratio – Basel I Tier 1 common capital divided by period-end Basel I risk-weighted assets.

Basel I Leverage ratio – Basel I Tier 1 risk-based capital divided by adjusted average total assets.

Basel I Tier 1 risk-based capital – Total shareholders’ equity, plus trust preferred capital securities, plus certain noncontrolling interests that are held by others; less goodwill and certain other intangible assets (net of eligible deferred taxes relating to taxable and nontaxable combinations), less equity investments in nonfinancial companies less ineligible servicing assets and less net unrealized holding losses on available for sale equity securities. Net unrealized holding gains on available for sale equity securities, net unrealized holding gains (losses) on available for sale debt securities and net unrealized holding gains (losses) on cash flow hedge derivatives are excluded from total shareholders’ equity for Basel I Tier 1 risk-based capital purposes.

Basel I Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio – Basel I Tier 1 risk-based capital divided by period-end Basel I risk-weighted assets.

Basel I Total risk-based capital – Basel I Tier 1 risk-based capital plus qualifying subordinated debt and trust preferred securities, other noncontrolling interest not qualified as Basel I Tier 1, eligible gains on available for sale equity securities and the allowance for loan and lease losses, subject to certain limitations.

Basel I Total risk-based capital ratio – Basel I Total risk-based capital divided by period-end Basel I risk-weighted assets.

Basis point – One hundredth of a percentage point.

Carrying value of purchased impaired loans – The net value on the balance sheet which represents the recorded investment less any valuation allowance.

Cash recoveries – Cash recoveries used in the context of purchased impaired loans represent cash payments from customers that exceeded the recorded investment of the designated impaired loan.

Charge-off – Process of removing a loan or portion of a loan from our balance sheet because it is considered uncollectible. We also record a charge-off when a loan is transferred from portfolio holdings to held for sale by reducing the loan carrying amount to the fair value of the loan, if fair value is less than carrying amount.

Combined loan-to-value ratio (CLTV) – This is the aggregate principal balance(s) of the mortgages on a property divided by its appraised value or purchase price.

Commercial mortgage banking activities – Includes commercial mortgage servicing, originating commercial mortgages for sale and related hedging activities. Commercial mortgage banking activities revenue includes revenue derived from commercial mortgage servicing (including net interest income and noninterest income from loan servicing and ancillary services, net of commercial mortgage servicing rights amortization, and commercial mortgage servicing rights valuations net of economic hedge), and revenue derived from commercial mortgage loans intended for sale and related hedges (including loan origination fees, net interest income, valuation adjustments and gains or losses on sales).

Common shareholders’ equity to total assets – Common shareholders’ equity divided by total assets. Common shareholders’ equity equals total shareholders’ equity less the liquidation value of preferred stock.

Core net interest income – Core net interest income is total net interest income less purchase accounting accretion.

Credit derivatives – Contractual agreements, primarily credit default swaps, that provide protection against a credit event of one or more referenced credits. The nature of a credit event is established by the protection buyer and protection seller at the inception of a transaction, and such events include bankruptcy, insolvency and failure to meet payment obligations when due. The buyer of the credit derivative pays a periodic fee in return for a payment by the protection seller upon the occurrence, if any, of a credit event.

Credit spread – The difference in yield between debt issues of similar maturity. The excess of yield attributable to credit spread is often used as a measure of relative creditworthiness, with a reduction in the credit spread reflecting an improvement in the borrower’s perceived creditworthiness.

 

 

70    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

Derivatives – Financial contracts whose value is derived from changes in publicly traded securities, interest rates, currency exchange rates or market indices. Derivatives cover a wide assortment of financial contracts, including but not limited to forward contracts, futures, options and swaps.

Duration of equity – An estimate of the rate sensitivity of our economic value of equity. A negative duration of equity is associated with asset sensitivity (i.e., positioned for rising interest rates), while a positive value implies liability sensitivity (i.e., positioned for declining interest rates). For example, if the duration of equity is -1.5 years, the economic value of equity increases by 1.5% for each 100 basis point increase in interest rates.

Earning assets – Assets that generate income, which include: federal funds sold; resale agreements; trading securities; interest-earning deposits with banks; loans held for sale; loans; investment securities; and certain other assets.

Economic capital – Represents the amount of resources that a business or business segment should hold to guard against potentially large losses that could cause insolvency and is based on a measurement of economic risk. The economic capital measurement process involves converting a risk distribution to the capital that is required to support the risk, consistent with our target credit rating. As such, economic risk serves as a “common currency” of risk that allows us to compare different risks on a similar basis.

Effective duration – A measurement, expressed in years, that, when multiplied by a change in interest rates, would approximate the percentage change in value of on- and off- balance sheet positions.

Efficiency – Noninterest expense divided by total revenue.

Fair value – The price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.

FICO score – A credit bureau-based industry standard score created by Fair Isaac Co. which predicts the likelihood of borrower default. We use FICO scores both in underwriting and assessing credit risk in our consumer lending portfolio. Lower FICO scores indicate likely higher risk of default, while higher FICO scores indicate likely lower risk of default. FICO scores are updated on a periodic basis.

Foreign exchange contracts – Contracts that provide for the future receipt and delivery of foreign currency at previously agreed-upon terms.

Funds transfer pricing – A management accounting methodology designed to recognize the net interest income effects of sources and uses of funds provided by the assets and liabilities of a business segment. We assign these balances

LIBOR-based funding rates at origination that represent the interest cost for us to raise/invest funds with similar maturity and repricing structures.

Futures and forward contracts – Contracts in which the buyer agrees to purchase and the seller agrees to deliver a specific financial instrument at a predetermined price or yield. May be settled either in cash or by delivery of the underlying financial instrument.

GAAP – Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Home price index (HPI) – A broad measure of the movement of single-family house prices in the U.S.

Impaired loans – Loans are determined to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that all contractually required payments will not be collected. Impaired loans include commercial nonperforming loans and consumer and commercial TDRs, regardless of nonperforming status. Excluded from impaired loans are nonperforming leases, loans held for sale, loans accounted for under the fair value option, smaller balance homogenous type loans and purchased impaired loans.

Interest rate floors and caps – Interest rate protection instruments that involve payment from the protection seller to the protection buyer of an interest differential, which represents the difference between a short-term rate (e.g., three-month LIBOR) and an agreed-upon rate (the strike rate) applied to a notional principal amount.

Interest rate swap contracts – Contracts that are entered into primarily as an asset/liability management strategy to reduce interest rate risk. Interest rate swap contracts are exchanges of interest rate payments, such as fixed-rate payments for floating-rate payments, based on notional principal amounts.

Intrinsic value – The difference between the price, if any, required to be paid for stock issued pursuant to an equity compensation arrangement and the fair market value of the underlying stock.

Investment securities – Collectively, securities available for sale and securities held to maturity.

LIBOR – Acronym for London InterBank Offered Rate. LIBOR is the average interest rate charged when banks in the London wholesale money market (or interbank market) borrow unsecured funds from each other. LIBOR rates are used as a benchmark for interest rates on a global basis. PNC’s product set includes loans priced using LIBOR as a benchmark.

Loan-to-value ratio (LTV) – A calculation of a loan’s collateral coverage that is used both in underwriting and

 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    71


Table of Contents

assessing credit risk in our lending portfolio. LTV is the sum total of loan obligations secured by collateral divided by the market value of that same collateral. Market values of the collateral are based on an independent valuation of the collateral. For example, an LTV of less than 90% is better secured and has less credit risk than an LTV of greater than or equal to 90%.

Loss given default (LGD) – An estimate of loss, net of recovery based on collateral type, collateral value, loan exposure, or the guarantor(s) quality and guaranty type (full or partial). Each loan has its own LGD. The LGD risk rating measures the percentage of exposure of a specific credit obligation that we expect to lose if default occurs. LGD is net of recovery, through either liquidation of collateral or deficiency judgments rendered from foreclosure or bankruptcy proceedings.

Net interest margin – Annualized taxable-equivalent net interest income divided by average earning assets.

Nonaccretable difference – Contractually required payments receivable on a purchased impaired loan in excess of the cash flows expected to be collected.

Nonaccrual loans – Loans for which we do not accrue interest income. Nonaccrual loans include nonperforming loans, in addition to loans accounted for under fair value option and loans accounted for as held for sale for which full collection of contractual principal and/or interest is not probable.

Nondiscretionary assets under administration – Assets we hold for our customers/clients in a nondiscretionary, custodial capacity. We do not include these assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Nonperforming assets – Nonperforming assets include nonperforming loans and OREO and foreclosed assets, but exclude certain government insured or guaranteed loans for which we expect to collect substantially all principal and interest, loans held for sale, loans accounted for under the fair value option and purchased impaired loans. We do not accrue interest income on assets classified as nonperforming.

Nonperforming loans – Loans accounted for at amortized cost for which we do not accrue interest income. Nonperforming loans include loans to commercial, commercial real estate, equipment lease financing, home equity, residential real estate, credit card and other consumer customers as well as TDRs which have not returned to performing status. Nonperforming loans exclude certain government insured or guaranteed loans for which we expect to collect substantially all principal and interest, loans held for sale, loans accounted for under the fair value option and purchased impaired loans. Nonperforming loans exclude purchased impaired loans as we are currently accreting interest income over the expected life of the loans.

Notional amount – A number of currency units, shares, or other units specified in a derivative contract.

Operating leverage – The period to period dollar or percentage change in total revenue (GAAP basis) less the dollar or percentage change in noninterest expense. A positive variance indicates that revenue growth exceeded expense growth (i.e., positive operating leverage) while a negative variance implies expense growth exceeded revenue growth (i.e., negative operating leverage).

Options – Contracts that grant the purchaser, for a premium payment, the right, but not the obligation, to either purchase or sell the associated financial instrument at a set price during a specified period or at a specified date in the future.

Other real estate owned (OREO) and foreclosed assets – Assets taken in settlement of troubled loans primarily through deed-in-lieu of foreclosure or foreclosure. Foreclosed assets include real and personal property, equity interests in corporations, partnerships, and limited liability companies.

Other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) – When the fair value of a security is less than its amortized cost basis, an assessment is performed to determine whether the impairment is other-than-temporary. If we intend to sell the security or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current-period credit loss, an other-than-temporary impairment is considered to have occurred. In such cases, an other-than-temporary impairment is recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the investment’s amortized cost basis and its fair value at the balance sheet date. Further, if we do not expect to recover the entire amortized cost of the security, an other-than-temporary impairment is considered to have occurred. However for debt securities, if we do not intend to sell the security and it is not more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before its recovery, the other-than-temporary loss is separated into (a) the amount representing the credit loss, and (b) the amount related to all other factors. The other-than-temporary impairment related to credit losses is recognized in earnings while the amount related to all other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income, net of tax.

Parent company liquidity coverage – Liquid assets divided by funding obligations within a two year period.

Pretax earnings – Income before income taxes and noncontrolling interests.

Pretax, pre-provision earnings – Total revenue less noninterest expense.

Primary client relationship – A corporate banking client relationship with annual revenue generation of $10,000 to

 

 

72    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

$50,000 or more, and for Asset Management Group, a client relationship with annual revenue generation of $10,000 or more.

Probability of default (PD) – An internal risk rating that indicates the likelihood that a credit obligor will enter into default status.

Purchase accounting accretion – Accretion of the discounts and premiums on acquired assets and liabilities. The purchase accounting accretion is recognized in net interest income over the weighted-average life of the financial instruments using the constant effective yield method. Accretion for purchased impaired loans includes any cash recoveries received in excess of the recorded investment.

Purchased impaired loans – Acquired loans determined to be credit impaired under FASB ASC 310-30 (AICPA SOP 03-3). Loans are determined to be impaired if there is evidence of credit deterioration since origination and for which it is probable that all contractually required payments will not be collected.

Recorded investment (purchased impaired loans) – The initial investment of a purchased impaired loan plus interest accretion and less any cash payments and writedowns to date. The recorded investment excludes any valuation allowance which is included in our allowance for loan and lease losses.

Recovery – Cash proceeds received on a loan that we had previously charged off. We credit the amount received to the allowance for loan and lease losses.

Residential development loans – Project-specific loans to commercial customers for the construction or development of residential real estate including land, single family homes, condominiums and other residential properties.

Residential mortgage servicing rights hedge gains/(losses), net – We have elected to measure acquired or originated residential mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) at fair value under GAAP. We employ a risk management strategy designed to protect the economic value of MSRs from changes in interest rates. This strategy utilizes securities and a portfolio of derivative instruments to hedge changes in the fair value of MSRs arising from changes in interest rates. These financial instruments are expected to have changes in fair value which are negatively correlated to the change in fair value of the MSR portfolio. Net MSR hedge gains/(losses) represent the change in the fair value of MSRs, exclusive of changes due to time decay and payoffs, combined with the change in the fair value of the associated securities and derivative instruments.

Return on average assets – Annualized net income divided by average assets.

Return on average capital – Annualized net income divided by average capital.

Return on average common shareholders’ equity – Annualized net income attributable to common shareholders divided by average common shareholders’ equity.

Risk-weighted assets – Computed by the assignment of specific risk-weights (as defined by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System) to assets and off-balance sheet instruments.

Securitization – The process of legally transforming financial assets into securities.

Servicing rights – An intangible asset or liability created by an obligation to service assets for others. Typical servicing rights include the right to receive a fee for collecting and forwarding payments on loans and related taxes and insurance premiums held in escrow.

Swaptions – Contracts that grant the purchaser, for a premium payment, the right, but not the obligation, to enter into an interest rate swap agreement during a specified period or at a specified date in the future.

Taxable-equivalent interest – The interest income earned on certain assets is completely or partially exempt from Federal income tax. As such, these tax-exempt instruments typically yield lower returns than taxable investments. To provide more meaningful comparisons of yields and margins for all interest-earning assets, we use interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis in calculating average yields and net interest margins by increasing the interest income earned on tax-exempt assets to make it fully equivalent to interest income earned on other taxable investments. This adjustment is not permitted under GAAP on the Consolidated Income Statement.

Total equity – Total shareholders’ equity plus noncontrolling interests.

Total return swap – A non-traditional swap where one party agrees to pay the other the “total return” of a defined underlying asset (e.g., a loan), usually in return for receiving a stream of LIBOR-based cash flows. The total returns of the asset, including interest and any default shortfall, are passed through to the counterparty. The counterparty is therefore assuming the credit and economic risk of the underlying asset.

Transaction deposits – The sum of interest-bearing money market deposits, interest-bearing demand deposits, and noninterest-bearing deposits.

Troubled debt restructuring (TDR) – A loan whose terms have been restructured in a manner that grants a concession to a borrower experiencing financial difficulties.

 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    73


Table of Contents

Value-at-risk (VaR) – A statistically-based measure of risk that describes the amount of potential loss which may be incurred due to adverse market movements. The measure is of the maximum loss which should not be exceeded on 95 out of 100 days for a 95% VaR.

Watchlist – A list of criticized loans, credit exposure or other assets compiled for internal monitoring purposes. We define criticized exposure for this purpose as exposure with an internal risk rating of other assets especially mentioned, substandard, doubtful or loss.

Yield curve – A graph showing the relationship between the yields on financial instruments or market indices of the same credit quality with different maturities. For example, a “normal” or “positive” yield curve exists when long-term bonds have higher yields than short-term bonds. A “flat” yield curve exists when yields are the same for short-term and long-term bonds. A “steep” yield curve exists when yields on long-term bonds are significantly higher than on short-term bonds. An “inverted” or “negative” yield curve exists when short-term bonds have higher yields than long-term bonds.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

We make statements in this Report, and we may from time to time make other statements, regarding our outlook for earnings, revenues, expenses, capital levels and ratios, liquidity levels, asset levels, asset quality, financial position, and other matters regarding or affecting PNC and its future business and operations that are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by words such as “believe,” “plan,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “see,” “look,” “intend,” “outlook,” “project,” “forecast,” “estimate,” “goal,” “will,” “should” and other similar words and expressions. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties, which change over time.

Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made. We do not assume any duty and do not undertake to update forward-looking statements. Actual results or future events could differ, possibly materially, from those anticipated in forward-looking statements, as well as from historical performance.

Our forward-looking statements are subject to the following principal risks and uncertainties.

   

Our businesses, financial results and balance sheet values are affected by business and economic conditions, including the following:

   

Changes in interest rates and valuations in debt, equity and other financial markets.

   

Disruptions in the liquidity and other functioning of U.S. and global financial markets.

   

The impact on financial markets and the economy of any changes in the credit ratings of U.S. Treasury obligations and other U.S. government-backed debt, as well as issues surrounding the level of U.S. and European government debt and concerns regarding the creditworthiness of certain sovereign governments, supranationals and financial institutions in Europe.

   

Actions by Federal Reserve, U.S. Treasury and other government agencies, including those that impact money supply and market interest rates.

   

Changes in customers’, suppliers’ and other counterparties’ performance and creditworthiness.

   

Slowing or failure of the current moderate economic expansion.

   

Continued effects of aftermath of recessionary conditions and uneven spread of positive impacts of recovery on the economy and our counterparties, including adverse impacts on levels of unemployment, loan utilization rates, delinquencies, defaults and counterparty ability to meet credit and other obligations.

   

Changes in customer preferences and behavior, whether due to changing business and economic conditions, legislative and regulatory initiatives, or other factors.

   

Our forward-looking financial statements are subject to the risk that economic and financial market conditions will be substantially different than we are currently expecting. These statements are based on our current view that the moderate U.S. economic expansion will persist, despite drags from Federal fiscal restraint and a European recession, and short-term interest rates will remain very low but bond yields will be higher in the second half of 2013. These forward-looking statements also do not, unless otherwise indicated, take into account the impact of potential legal and regulatory contingencies.

   

PNC’s ability to take certain capital actions, including paying dividends and any plans to increase common stock dividends, repurchase common stock under current or future programs, or issue or redeem preferred stock or other regulatory capital instruments, is subject to the review of such proposed actions by the Federal Reserve as part of PNC’s comprehensive capital plan for the applicable period in connection with the regulators’ Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) process and to the acceptance of such capital plan and non-objection to such capital actions by the Federal Reserve.

   

PNC’s regulatory capital ratios in the future will depend on, among other things, the company’s

 

 

74    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents
   

financial performance, the scope and terms of final capital regulations then in effect (particularly those implementing the Basel Capital Accords), and management actions affecting the composition of PNC’s balance sheet. In addition, PNC’s ability to determine, evaluate and forecast regulatory capital ratios, and to take actions (such as capital distributions) based on actual or forecasted capital ratios, will be dependent on the ongoing development, validation and regulatory approval of related models.

   

Legal and regulatory developments could have an impact on our ability to operate our businesses, financial condition, results of operations, competitive position, reputation, or pursuit of attractive acquisition opportunities. Reputational impacts could affect matters such as business generation and retention, liquidity, funding, and ability to attract and retain management. These developments could include:

   

Changes resulting from legislative and regulatory reforms, including major reform of the regulatory oversight structure of the financial services industry and changes to laws and regulations involving tax, pension, bankruptcy, consumer protection, and other industry aspects, and changes in accounting policies and principles. We will be impacted by extensive reforms provided for in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) and otherwise growing out of the recent financial crisis, the precise nature, extent and timing of which, and their impact on us, remains uncertain.

   

Changes to regulations governing bank capital and liquidity standards, including due to the Dodd-Frank Act and to Basel-related initiatives.

   

Unfavorable resolution of legal proceedings or other claims and regulatory and other governmental investigations or other inquiries. In addition to matters relating to PNC’s business and activities, such matters may include proceedings, claims, investigations, or inquiries relating to pre-acquisition business and activities of acquired companies, such as National City. These matters may result in monetary judgments or settlements or other remedies, including fines, penalties, restitution or alterations in our business practices, and in additional expenses and collateral costs, and may cause reputational harm to PNC.

   

Results of the regulatory examination and supervision process, including our failure to satisfy requirements of agreements with governmental agencies.

   

Impact on business and operating results of any costs associated with obtaining rights in intellectual property claimed by others and of adequacy of our intellectual property protection in general.

   

Business and operating results are affected by our ability to identify and effectively manage risks inherent in our businesses, including, where appropriate, through effective use of third-party insurance, derivatives, and capital management techniques, and to meet evolving regulatory capital standards. In particular, our results currently depend on our ability to manage elevated levels of impaired assets.

   

Business and operating results also include impacts relating to our equity interest in BlackRock, Inc. and rely to a significant extent on information provided to us by BlackRock. Risks and uncertainties that could affect BlackRock are discussed in more detail by BlackRock in its SEC filings.

   

We grow our business in part by acquiring from time to time other financial services companies, financial services assets and related deposits and other liabilities. Acquisition risks and uncertainties include those presented by the nature of the business acquired, including in some cases those associated with our entry into new businesses or new geographic or other markets and risks resulting from our inexperience in those new areas, as well as risks and uncertainties related to the acquisition transactions themselves, regulatory issues, and the integration of the acquired businesses into PNC after closing.

   

Competition can have an impact on customer acquisition, growth and retention and on credit spreads and product pricing, which can affect market share, deposits and revenues. Industry restructuring in the current environment could also impact our business and financial performance through changes in counterparty creditworthiness and performance and in the competitive and regulatory landscape. Our ability to anticipate and respond to technological changes can also impact our ability to respond to customer needs and meet competitive demands.

   

Business and operating results can also be affected by widespread natural and other disasters, dislocations, terrorist activities or international hostilities through impacts on the economy and financial markets generally or on us or our counterparties specifically.

We provide greater detail regarding these as well as other factors in our 2012 Form 10-K, in our first quarter 2013 Form 10-Q, and elsewhere in this Report, including in the Risk Factors and Risk Management sections and the Legal Proceedings and Commitments and Guarantees Notes of the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in those reports. Our forward-looking statements may also be subject to other risks and uncertainties, including those discussed elsewhere in this Report or in our other filings with the SEC.

 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    75


Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT

THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.

 

In millions, except per share data

Unaudited

   Three months ended
June 30
   

Six months ended

June 30

 
   2013     2012     2013     2012  

Interest Income

        

Loans

   $ 1,955      $ 2,163      $ 3,984      $ 4,114   

Investment securities

     422        527        892        1,053   

Other

     92        106        204        226   

Total interest income

     2,469        2,796        5,080        5,393   

Interest Expense

        

Deposits

     86        83        179        186   

Borrowed funds

     125        187        254        390   

Total interest expense

     211        270        433        576   

Net interest income

     2,258        2,526        4,647        4,817   

Noninterest Income

        

Asset management

     340        278        648        562   

Consumer services

     314        290        610        554   

Corporate services

     326        290        603        522   

Residential mortgage

     167        (173     401        57   

Service charges on deposits

     147        144        283        271   

Net gains on sales of securities

     61        62        75        119   

Other-than-temporary impairments

     (10     (32     (11     (48

Less: Noncredit portion of other-than-temporary impairments (a)

     (6     2        3        24   

Net other-than-temporary impairments

     (4     (34     (14     (72

Other

     455        240        766        525   

Total noninterest income

     1,806        1,097        3,372        2,538   

Total revenue

     4,064        3,623        8,019        7,355   

Provision For Credit Losses

     157        256        393        441   

Noninterest Expense

        

Personnel

     1,186        1,119        2,355        2,230   

Occupancy

     206        199        417        389   

Equipment

     189        181        372        356   

Marketing

     67        67        112        135   

Other

     787        1,082        1,574        1,993   

Total noninterest expense

     2,435        2,648        4,830        5,103   

Income before income taxes and noncontrolling interests

     1,472        719        2,796        1,811   

Income taxes

     349        173        669        454   

Net income

     1,123        546        2,127        1,357   

Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

     1        (5     (8     1   

 Preferred stock dividends and discount accretion and redemptions

     53        25        128        64   

Net income attributable to common shareholders

   $ 1,069      $ 526      $ 2,007      $ 1,292   

Earnings Per Common Share

        

Basic

   $ 2.02      $ 1.00      $ 3.79      $ 2.44   

Diluted

     1.99        .98        3.76        2.42   

Average Common Shares Outstanding

        

Basic

     528        527        527        526   

Diluted

     531        530        530        529   
(a) Included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).

See accompanying Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

76    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.

 

In millions

Unaudited

   Three months ended
June 30
   

Six months ended

June 30

 
   2013     2012     2013     2012  

Net income

   $ 1,123      $ 546      $ 2,127      $ 1,357   

Other comprehensive income, before tax and net of reclassifications into Net income:

        

Net unrealized gains (losses) on non-OTTI securities

     (793     158        (963     396   

Net unrealized gains (losses) on OTTI securities

     (45     8        96        414   

Net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedge derivatives

     (281     6        (388     (84

Pension and other postretirement benefit plan adjustments

     7        39        53        87   

Other

     (7     (30     (13     (18

Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax and net of reclassifications into Net income

     (1,119     181        (1,215     795   

Income tax benefit (expense) related to items of Other comprehensive income

     397        (60     426        (288

Other comprehensive income (loss), after tax and net of reclassifications into Net income

     (722     121        (789     507   

Comprehensive income

     401        667        1,338        1,864   

Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

     1        (5     (8     1   

Comprehensive income attributable to PNC

   $ 400      $ 672      $ 1,346      $ 1,863   

See accompanying Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    77


Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.

 

In millions, except par value

Unaudited

  

June 30

2013

    December 31
2012
 

Assets

    

Cash and due from banks (includes $4 and $4 for VIEs) (a)

   $ 4,051      $ 5,220   

Federal funds sold and resale agreements (includes $210 and $256 measured at fair value) (b)

     1,613        1,463   

Trading securities

     2,109        2,096   

Interest-earning deposits with banks (includes $6 and $6 for VIEs) (a)

     3,797        3,984   

Loans held for sale (includes $2,881 and $2,868 measured at fair value) (b)

     3,814        3,693   

Investment securities (includes $7 and $9 for VIEs) (a)

     57,449        61,406   

Loans (includes $7,845 and $7,781 for VIEs) (a)
(includes $811 and $244 measured at fair value) (b)

     189,775        185,856   

Allowance for loan and lease losses (includes $(64) and $(75) for VIEs) (a)

     (3,772     (4,036

Net loans

     186,003        181,820   

Goodwill

     9,075        9,072   

Other intangible assets

     2,153        1,797   

Equity investments (includes $492 and $1,429 for VIEs) (a)

     10,054        10,877   

Other (includes $567 and $1,281 for VIEs) (a)
(includes $291 and $319 measured at fair value) (b)

     24,297        23,679   

Total assets

   $ 304,415      $ 305,107   

Liabilities

    

Deposits

    

Noninterest-bearing

   $ 66,708      $ 69,980   

Interest-bearing

     145,571        143,162   

Total deposits

     212,279        213,142   

Borrowed funds

    

Federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements

     4,303        3,327   

Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings

     8,481        9,437   

Bank notes and senior debt

     11,177        10,429   

Subordinated debt

     7,113        7,299   

Commercial paper (includes $5,900 and $6,045 for VIEs) (a)

     6,400        8,453   

Other (includes $434 and $257 for VIEs) (a) (includes $195 and $0 measured at fair value) (b)

     2,390        1,962   

Total borrowed funds

     39,864        40,907   

Allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit

     242        250   

Accrued expenses (includes $120 and $132 for VIEs) (a)

     4,057        4,449   

Other (includes $378 and $976 for VIEs) (a)

     6,032        4,594   

Total liabilities

     262,474        263,342   

Equity

    

Preferred stock (c)

    

Common stock ($5 par value, authorized 800 shares, issued 539 and 538 shares)

     2,693        2,690   

Capital surplus – preferred stock

     3,939        3,590   

Capital surplus – common stock and other

     12,234        12,193   

Retained earnings

     21,828        20,265   

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

     45        834   

Common stock held in treasury at cost: 8 and 10 shares

     (453     (569

Total shareholders’ equity

     40,286        39,003   

Noncontrolling interests

     1,655        2,762   

Total equity

     41,941        41,765   

Total liabilities and equity

   $ 304,415      $ 305,107   
(a) Amounts represent the assets or liabilities of consolidated variable interest entities (VIEs).
(b) Amounts represent items for which the Corporation has elected the fair value option.
(c) Par value less than $.5 million at each date.

See accompanying Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

78    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.

 

In millions

Unaudited

    

Six months ended

June 30

 
     2013      2012  

Operating Activities

       

Net income

     $ 2,127       $ 1,357   

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided (used) by operating activities

       

Provision for credit losses

       393         441   

Depreciation and amortization

       583         554   

Deferred income taxes

       804         412   

Net gains on sales of securities

       (75      (119

Net other-than-temporary impairments

       14         72   

Mortgage servicing rights valuation adjustment

       (254      216   

Gain on sale of Visa Class B common shares

       (83   

Noncash charges on trust preferred securities redemption

       30         130   

Undistributed earnings of BlackRock

       (173      (132

Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements

       (18      (15

Net change in

       

Trading securities and other short-term investments

       463         1,394   

Loans held for sale

       (755      (521

Other assets

       133         168   

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

       (1,293      11   

Other

       (100      (154

Net cash provided (used) by operating activities

       1,796         3,814   

Investing Activities

       

Sales

       

Securities available for sale

       3,814         6,594   

Loans

       888         771   

Repayments/maturities

       

Securities available for sale

       5,232         4,198   

Securities held to maturity

       1,191         1,638   

Purchases

       

Securities available for sale

       (6,785      (10,104

Securities held to maturity

       (224      (100

Loans

       (603      (672

Net change in

       

Federal funds sold and resale agreements

       (155      553   

Interest-earning deposits with banks

       187         (2,537

Loans

       (4,494      (8,206

Net cash paid for acquisition activity

          (3,294

Other (a)

       306         (82

Net cash provided (used) by investing activities

       (643      (11,241

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    79


Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.

(continued from previous page)

 

In millions

Unaudited

    

Six months ended

June 30

 
     2013      2012  

Financing Activities

       

Net change in

       

Noninterest-bearing deposits

     $ (3,226    $ 1,264   

Interest-bearing deposits

       2,409         (350

Federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements

       978         836   

Commercial paper

       (2,170      3,152   

Other borrowed funds

       (153      566   

Sales/issuances

       

Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings

       5,000         7,000   

Bank notes and senior debt

       2,442         2,089   

Subordinated debt

       744      

Commercial paper

       5,244         9,117   

Other borrowed funds

       402         548   

Preferred stock

       496         1,482   

Common and treasury stock

       131         112   

Repayments/maturities

       

Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings

       (5,956      (4,497

Bank notes and senior debt

       (1,425      (3,777

Subordinated debt

       (705      (829

Commercial paper

       (5,127      (7,071

Other borrowed funds

       (314      (1,689

Preferred stock

       (150   

Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements

       18         15   

Redemption of noncontrolling interests

       (375   

Acquisition of treasury stock

       (23      (51

Preferred stock cash dividends paid

       (118      (63

Common stock cash dividends paid

       (444      (396

Net cash provided (used) by financing activities

       (2,322      7,458   

Net Increase (Decrease) In Cash And Due From Banks

       (1,169      31   

Cash and due from banks at beginning of period

       5,220         4,105   

Cash and due from banks at end of period

     $ 4,051       $ 4,136   

Supplemental Disclosures

       

Interest paid

     $ 440       $ 633   

Income taxes paid

       214         22   

Income taxes refunded

       1         9   

Non-cash Investing and Financing Items

       

Transfer from (to) loans to (from) loans held for sale, net

       13         356   

Transfer from loans to foreclosed assets

       378         509   

See accompanying Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

(a) Includes the impact of the consolidation of a variable interest entity as of March 31, 2013.

 

80    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.

 

BUSINESS

PNC is one of the largest diversified financial services companies in the United States and is headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

PNC has businesses engaged in retail banking, corporate and institutional banking, asset management, and residential mortgage banking, providing many of its products and services nationally, as well as other products and services in PNC’s primary geographic markets located in Pennsylvania, Ohio, New Jersey, Michigan, Illinois, Maryland, Indiana, North Carolina, Florida, Kentucky, Washington, D.C., Delaware, Alabama, Virginia, Georgia, Missouri, Wisconsin and South Carolina. PNC also provides certain products and services internationally.

NOTE 1 ACCOUNTING POLICIES

BASIS OF FINANCIAL STATEMENT PRESENTATION

Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the parent company and its subsidiaries, most of which are wholly owned, and certain partnership interests and variable interest entities.

We prepared these consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). We have eliminated intercompany accounts and transactions. We have also reclassified certain prior year amounts to conform to the 2013 presentation. These reclassifications did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations. We evaluate the materiality of identified errors in the financial statements using both an income statement and a balance sheet approach, based on relevant quantitative and qualitative factors. Net income includes certain adjustments to correct immaterial errors related to previously reported periods.

In our opinion, the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements reflect all normal, recurring adjustments needed to present fairly our results for the interim periods. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year or any other interim period.

When preparing these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements, we have assumed that you have read the audited consolidated financial statements included in our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Reference is made to Note 1 Accounting Policies in the 2012 Form 10-K for a detailed description of significant accounting policies. There have been no significant changes to these policies in the first six months of 2013 other than as disclosed herein. These interim

consolidated financial statements serve to update the 2012 Form 10-K and may not include all information and notes necessary to constitute a complete set of financial statements.

We have considered the impact on these consolidated financial statements of subsequent events.

USE OF ESTIMATES

We prepared these consolidated financial statements using financial information available at the time, which requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported. Our most significant estimates pertain to our fair value measurements, allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit, and accretion on purchased impaired loans. Actual results may differ from the estimates and the differences may be material to the consolidated financial statements.

INVESTMENT IN BLACKROCK, INC.

We account for our investment in the common stock and Series B Preferred Stock of BlackRock (deemed to be in-substance common stock) under the equity method of accounting. In May 2012, we exchanged 2 million shares of Series B Preferred Stock of BlackRock for an equal number of shares of BlackRock common stock. The exchange transaction had no impact on the carrying value of our investment in BlackRock or our use of the equity method of accounting. The investment in BlackRock is reflected on our Consolidated Balance Sheet in Equity investments, while our equity in earnings of BlackRock is reported on our Consolidated Income Statement in Asset management revenue.

We also hold shares of Series C Preferred Stock of BlackRock pursuant to our obligation to partially fund a portion of certain BlackRock long-term incentive plan (LTIP) programs. Since these preferred shares are not deemed to be in-substance common stock, we have elected to account for these preferred shares at fair value and the changes in fair value will offset the impact of marking-to-market the obligation to deliver these shares to BlackRock. Our investment in the BlackRock Series C Preferred Stock is included on our Consolidated Balance Sheet in Other assets. Our obligation to transfer these shares to BlackRock is classified as a derivative not designated as a hedging instrument under GAAP as disclosed in Note 13 Financial Derivatives.

On January 31, 2013, we transferred 205,350 shares to BlackRock in connection with our obligation. After this transfer, we hold approximately 1.3 million shares of BlackRock Series C Preferred Stock which are available to fund our obligation in connection with the BlackRock LTIP programs.

 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    81


Table of Contents

NONPERFORMING ASSETS

Nonperforming assets include nonperforming loans and leases, including nonperforming troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) and other real estate owned and foreclosed assets.

Commercial Loans

We generally classify Commercial Lending (Commercial, Commercial Real Estate, and Equipment Lease Financing) loans as nonperforming and place them on nonaccrual status when we determine that the collection of interest or principal is not probable, including when delinquency of interest or principal payments has existed for 90 days or more and the loans are not well-secured and/or in the process of collection. A loan is considered well-secured when the collateral in the form of liens on (or pledges of) real or personal property, including marketable securities, has a realizable value sufficient to discharge the debt in full, including accrued interest. Such factors that would lead to nonperforming status would include, but are not limited to, the following:

   

Deterioration in the financial position of the borrower resulting in the loan moving from accrual to cash basis accounting,

   

The collection of principal or interest is 90 days or more past due unless the asset is both well-secured and in the process of collection,

   

Reasonable doubt exists as to the certainty of the borrower’s future debt service ability, whether 90 days have passed or not,

   

The borrower has filed or will likely file for bankruptcy,

   

The bank advances additional funds to cover principal or interest,

   

We are in the process of liquidating a commercial borrower, or

   

We are pursuing remedies under a guarantee.

We charge off commercial nonperforming loans when we determine that a specific loan, or portion thereof, is uncollectible. This determination is based on the specific facts and circumstances of the individual loans. In making this determination, we consider the viability of the business or project as a going concern, the past due status when the asset is not well-secured, the expected cash flows to repay the loan, the value of the collateral, and the ability and willingness of any guarantors to perform.

Additionally, in general, for smaller dollar commercial loans of $1 million or less, a partial or full charge-off will occur at 120 days past due for term loans and 180 days past due for revolvers.

Certain small business credit card balances are placed on nonaccrual status when they become 90 days or more past due. Such loans are charged-off at 180 days past due.

Consumer Loans

Nonperforming loans are those loans accounted for at amortized cost that have deteriorated in credit quality to the extent that full collection of contractual principal and interest is not probable. These loans are also classified as nonaccrual. For these loans, the current year accrued and uncollected interest is reversed through net interest income and prior year accrued and uncollected interest is charged-off. Additionally, these loans may be charged-off down to the fair value less costs to sell.

Loans acquired and accounted for under ASC 310-30 – Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality are reported as performing and accruing loans due to the accretion of interest income.

Loans accounted for under the fair value option and loans accounted for as held for sale are reported as performing loans as these loans are accounted for at fair value and the lower of carrying value or fair value less costs to sell, respectively. However, based upon the nonaccrual policies discussed below, interest income is not accrued. Additionally, based upon the nonaccrual policies discussed below, certain government insured loans for which we do not expect to collect substantially all principal and interest are reported as nonperforming and do not accrue interest. Alternatively, certain government insured loans for which we expect to collect substantially all principal and interest are not reported as nonperforming loans and continue to accrue interest.

In the first quarter of 2013, we completed our alignment of certain nonaccrual and charge-off policies consistent with interagency supervisory guidance on practices for loans and lines of credit related to consumer lending. This alignment primarily related to (i) subordinate consumer loans (home equity loans and lines and residential mortgages) where the first-lien loan was 90 days or more past due, (ii) government guaranteed loans where the guarantee may not result in collection of substantially all contractual principal and interest and (iii) loans with borrowers in bankruptcy. In the first quarter of 2013, due to classification as either nonperforming or, in the case of loans accounted for under the fair value option, nonaccrual loans, nonperforming loans increased by $426 million and net charge-offs increased by $134 million as a result of completing the alignment of the aforementioned policies. Additionally, overall delinquencies decreased $395 million due to loans now being reported as either nonperforming or, in the case of loans accounted for under the fair value option, nonaccruing or having been charged-off. The impact of the alignment of the policies was considered in our reserving process in the determination of our Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses (ALLL) at December 31, 2012. See Note 5 Asset Quality and Note 7 Allowances for Loan and Lease Losses and Unfunded Loan Commitments and Letters of Credit for additional information.

A consumer loan is considered well-secured when the collateral in the form of liens on (or pledges of) real or

 

 

82    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

personal property, including marketable securities, has a realizable value sufficient to discharge the debt in full, including accrued interest. Home equity installment loans and lines of credit, whether well-secured or not, are classified as nonaccrual at 90 days past due. Well-secured residential real estate loans are classified as nonaccrual at 180 days past due. In addition to these delinquency-related policies, a consumer loan may also be placed on nonaccrual status when:

   

The loan has been modified and classified as a TDR, as further discussed below;

   

Notification of bankruptcy has been received and the loan is 30 days or more past due;

   

The bank holds a subordinate lien position in the loan and the first lien loan is seriously stressed (i.e., 90 days or more past due);

   

Other loans within the same borrower relationship have been placed on nonaccrual or charge-off has been taken on them;

   

The bank has repossessed non-real estate collateral securing the loan; or

   

The bank has charged-off the loan to the value of the collateral.

Most consumer loans and lines of credit, not secured by residential real estate, are charged off after 120 to 180 days past due. Generally, they are not placed on nonaccrual status as permitted by regulatory guidance.

Home equity installment loans, home equity lines of credit, and residential real estate loans that are not well-secured and in the process of collection are charged-off at no later than 180 days past due to the estimated fair value of the collateral less costs to sell. In addition to this policy, the bank will also recognize a charge-off on a secured consumer loan when:

   

The bank holds a subordinate lien position in the loan and a foreclosure notice has been received on the first lien loan;

   

The bank holds a subordinate lien position in the loan which is 30 days or more past due with a combined loan to value ratio of greater than or equal to 110% and the first lien loan is seriously stressed (i.e., 90 days or more past due);

   

It is modified or otherwise restructured in a manner that results in the loan becoming collateral dependent;

   

Notification of bankruptcy has been received within the last 60 days and the loan is 60 days or more past due;

   

The borrower has been discharged from personal liability through Chapter 7 bankruptcy and has not formally reaffirmed his or her loan obligation to PNC; or

   

The collateral securing the loan has been repossessed and the value of the collateral is less than the recorded investment of the loan outstanding.

If payment is received on a nonaccrual loan, generally the payment is first applied to the recorded investment; payments are then applied to recover any charged-off amounts related to

the loan. Finally, if both recorded investment and any charge-offs have been recovered, then the payment will be recorded as fee and interest income.

Nonaccrual loans are generally not returned to accrual status until the borrower has performed in accordance with the contractual terms for a reasonable period of time (e.g., 6 months). When a nonperforming loan is returned to accrual status, it is then considered a performing loan.

A TDR is a loan whose terms have been restructured in a manner that grants a concession to a borrower experiencing financial difficulties. TDRs may include restructuring certain terms of loans, receipts of assets from debtors in partial satisfaction of loans, or a combination thereof. For TDRs, payments are applied based upon their contractual terms unless the related loan is deemed non-performing. TDRs are generally included in nonperforming loans until returned to performing status through the fulfilling of restructured terms for a reasonable period of time (generally 6 months). TDRs resulting from borrowers that have been discharged from personal liability through Chapter 7 bankruptcy and have not formally reaffirmed their loan obligations to PNC are not returned to accrual status.

See Note 5 Asset Quality and Note 7 Allowances for Loan and Lease Losses and Unfunded Loan Commitments and Letters of Credit for additional TDR information.

Foreclosed assets are comprised of any asset seized or property acquired through a foreclosure proceeding or acceptance of a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. Other real estate owned is comprised principally of commercial real estate and residential real estate properties obtained in partial or total satisfaction of loan obligations. After obtaining a foreclosure judgment, or in some jurisdictions the initiation of proceedings under a power of sale in the loan instruments, the property will be sold. When we are awarded title, we transfer the loan to foreclosed assets included in Other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. Property obtained in satisfaction of a loan is initially recorded at estimated fair value less cost to sell. Based upon the estimated fair value less cost to sell, the recorded investment of the loan is adjusted and, typically, a charge-off/recovery is recognized to the ALLL. We estimate fair values primarily based on appraisals, or sales agreements with third parties. Fair value also considers the proceeds expected from government insurance and guarantees upon the conveyance of the other real estate owned (OREO).

Subsequently, foreclosed assets are valued at the lower of the amount recorded at acquisition date or estimated fair value less cost to sell. Valuation adjustments on these assets and gains or losses realized from disposition of such property are reflected in Other noninterest expense.

See Note 5 Asset Quality and Note 7 Allowances for Loan and Lease Losses and Unfunded Loan Commitments and Letters of Credit for additional information.

 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    83


Table of Contents

ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES

We maintain the ALLL at a level that we believe to be appropriate to absorb estimated probable credit losses incurred in the loan and lease portfolios as of the balance sheet date. Our determination of the allowance is based on periodic evaluations of these loan and lease portfolios and other relevant factors. This critical estimate includes the use of significant amounts of PNC’s own historical data and complex methods to interpret them. We have an ongoing process to evaluate and enhance the quality, quantity and timeliness of our data and interpretation methods used in the determination of this allowance. These evaluations are inherently subjective as it requires material estimates, all of which may be susceptible to significant change, including, among others:

   

Probability of default (PD),

   

Loss given default (LGD),

   

Outstanding balance of the loan,

   

Movement through delinquency stages,

   

Amounts and timing of expected future cash flows,

   

Value of collateral, which may be obtained from third parties, and

   

Qualitative factors such as changes in current economic conditions that may not be reflected in historical results.

While our reserve methodologies strive to reflect all relevant risk factors, there continues to be uncertainty associated with, but not limited to, potential imprecision in the estimation process due to the inherent time lag of obtaining information and normal variations between estimates and actual outcomes. We provide additional reserves that are designed to provide coverage for losses attributable to such risks. The ALLL also includes factors which may not be directly measured in the determination of specific or pooled reserves. Such qualitative factors may include:

   

Industry concentrations and conditions,

   

Recent credit quality trends,

   

Recent loss experience in particular portfolios,

   

Recent macro-economic factors,

   

Model imprecision,

   

Changes in lending policies and procedures,

   

Timing of available information, including the performance of first lien positions, and

   

Limitations of available historical data.

In determining the appropriateness of the ALLL, we make specific allocations to impaired loans and allocations to portfolios of commercial and consumer loans.

Nonperforming loans are considered impaired under ASC 310-Receivables and are evaluated for a specific reserve. Specific reserve allocations are determined as follows:

   

For commercial nonperforming loans and TDRs greater than or equal to a defined dollar threshold, specific reserves are based on an analysis of the present value of the loan’s expected future cash

   

flows, the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral.

   

For commercial nonperforming loans and TDRs below the defined dollar threshold, the loans are aggregated for purposes of measuring specific reserve impairment using the applicable loan’s LGD percentage multiplied by the balance of the loan.

   

Consumer nonperforming loans are collectively reserved for unless classified as TDRs. For TDRs, specific reserves are determined through an analysis of the present value of the loan’s expected future cash flows, except for those instances where loans have been deemed collateral dependent, including loans where borrowers have been discharged from personal liability through Chapter 7 bankruptcy and have not formally reaffirmed their loan obligations to PNC. Once that determination has been made, those TDRs are charged down to the fair value of the collateral less costs to sell at each period end.

   

For purchased impaired loans, subsequent decreases to the net present value of expected cash flows will generally result in an impairment charge to the provision for credit losses, resulting in an increase to the ALLL.

When applicable, this process is applied across all the loan classes in a similar manner. However, as previously discussed, certain consumer loans and lines of credit, not secured by residential real estate, are charged off instead of being classified as nonperforming.

Our credit risk management policies, procedures and practices are designed to promote sound lending standards and prudent credit risk management. We have policies, procedures and practices that address financial statement requirements, collateral review and appraisal requirements, advance rates based upon collateral types, appropriate levels of exposure, cross-border risk, lending to specialized industries or borrower type, guarantor requirements, and regulatory compliance.

See Note 5 Asset Quality and Note 7 Allowances for Loan and Lease Losses and Unfunded Loan Commitments and Letters of Credit for additional information.

ALLOWANCE FOR UNFUNDED LOAN COMMITMENTS AND LETTERS OF CREDIT

We maintain the allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit at a level we believe is appropriate to absorb estimated probable credit losses on these unfunded credit facilities as of the balance sheet date. We determine the allowance based on periodic evaluations of the unfunded credit facilities, including an assessment of the probability of commitment usage, credit risk factors, and, solely for commercial lending, the terms and expiration dates of the unfunded credit facilities. Other than the estimation of the

 

 

84    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

probability of funding, the reserve for unfunded loan commitments is estimated in a manner similar to the methodology used for determining reserves for funded exposures. The allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit is recorded as a liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Net adjustments to the allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit are included in the provision for credit losses.

See Note 5 Asset Quality and Note 7 Allowances for Loan and Lease Losses and Unfunded Loan Commitments and Letters of Credit for additional information.

EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

Basic earnings per common share is calculated using the two-class method to determine income attributable to common shareholders. Unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are considered participating securities under the two-class method. Income attributable to common shareholders is then divided by the weighted-average common shares outstanding for the period.

Diluted earnings per common share is calculated under the more dilutive of either the treasury method or the two-class method. For the diluted calculation, we increase the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding by the assumed conversion of outstanding convertible preferred stock from the beginning of the year or date of issuance, if later, and the number of shares of common stock that would be issued assuming the exercise of stock options and warrants and the issuance of incentive shares using the treasury stock method. These adjustments to the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding are made only when such adjustments will dilute earnings per common share. See Note 14 Earnings Per Share for additional information.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In June 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2013-08, Financial Services – Investment Companies (ASC Topic 946): Amendments to the Scope, Measurement and Disclosure Requirement. This ASU modifies the guidance in ASC 946 for determining whether an entity is an investment company, as well as the measurement and disclosure requirements for investment companies. The ASU does not change current accounting where a noninvestment company parent retains the specialized accounting applied by an investment company subsidiary in consolidation. ASU 2013-08 will be applied prospectively for all periods beginning after December 15, 2013. We do not expect this ASU to have a material effect on our results of operations or financial position.

In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-10, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Inclusion of the Fed Funds Effective Swap Rate (or Overnight Index Swap Rate) as a Benchmark Interest Rate for Hedge Accounting Purposes. This ASU

amends existing guidance to include the Fed Funds effective swap rate (OIS) as a U.S. benchmark interest rate for hedge accounting purposes. The amendments also remove the restriction on using different benchmark interest rates for similar hedges. The effective date of ASU 2013-10 was July 17, 2013. However, since this ASU does not impact existing hedge accounting relationships, it did not have an effect on our results of operations or financial position.

In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-11, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists. This ASU clarifies current guidance to require that an unrecognized tax benefit or a portion thereof be presented in the statement of financial position as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for an NOL carryforward, similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward except when an NOL carryforward, similar tax loss, or tax credit carryforward is not available under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction to settle any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position. In such a case, the unrecognized tax benefit would be presented in the statement of financial position as a liability. No additional recurring disclosures are required by this ASU. This ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. Early adoption is permitted with prospective application to all unrecognized tax benefits that exist at the effective date. Retrospective application is also permitted. We do not expect this ASU to have a material effect on our results of operations or financial position.

For information on Recent Accounting Pronouncements issued prior to the second quarter, see Note 1 Accounting Policies in the Notes To The Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item I of our First Quarter 2013 Form 10-Q.

NOTE 2 ACQUISITION AND DIVESTITURE ACTIVITY

RBC Bank (USA) Acquisition

On March 2, 2012, PNC acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding common stock of RBC Bank (USA), the U.S. retail banking subsidiary of Royal Bank of Canada. As part of the acquisition, PNC also purchased a credit card portfolio from RBC Bank (Georgia), National Association. PNC paid $3.6 billion in cash as consideration for the acquisition of both RBC Bank (USA) and the credit card portfolio. The fair value of the net assets acquired totaled approximately $2.6 billion, including $18.1 billion of deposits, $14.5 billion of loans and $.2 billion of other intangible assets. Goodwill of $1.0 billion was recorded as part of the acquisition. Refer to Note 2 Acquisition and Divestiture Activity in Item 8 of our 2012 Form 10-K for additional details related to the RBC Bank (USA) transactions.

 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    85


Table of Contents

Sale of Smartstreet

Effective October 26, 2012, PNC divested certain deposits and assets of the Smartstreet business unit, which was acquired by PNC as part of the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition, to Union Bank, N.A. Smartstreet is a nationwide business focused on homeowner or community association managers and had approximately $1 billion of assets and deposits as of September 30, 2012. The gain on sale was immaterial and resulted in a reduction of goodwill and core deposit intangibles of $46 million and $13 million, respectively. Results from operations of Smartstreet from March 2, 2012 through October 26, 2012 are included in our Consolidated Income Statement.

NOTE 3 LOAN SALE AND SERVICING ACTIVITIES AND VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

Loan Sale and Servicing Activities

We have transferred residential and commercial mortgage loans in securitization or sales transactions in which we have continuing involvement. These transfers have occurred through Agency securitization, Non-agency securitization, and loan sale transactions. Agency securitizations consist of securitization transactions with Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC), and Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) (collectively the Agencies). FNMA and FHLMC generally securitize our transferred loans into mortgage-backed securities for sale into the secondary market through special purpose entities (SPEs) that they sponsor. We, as an authorized GNMA issuer/servicer, pool Federal Housing Administration (FHA) and Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) insured loans into mortgage-backed securities for sale into the secondary market. In Non-agency securitizations, we have transferred loans into securitization SPEs. In other instances, third-party investors have also purchased our loans in loan sale transactions and in certain instances have subsequently sold these loans into securitization SPEs. Securitization SPEs utilized in the Agency and Non-agency securitization transactions are variable interest entities (VIEs).

Our continuing involvement in the FNMA, FHLMC, and GNMA securitizations, Non-agency securitizations, and loan sale transactions generally consists of servicing, repurchases of previously transferred loans under certain conditions and loss share arrangements, and, in limited circumstances, holding of mortgage-backed securities issued by the securitization SPEs.

Depending on the transaction, we may act as the master, primary, and/or special servicer to the securitization SPEs or third-party investors. Servicing responsibilities typically consist of collecting and remitting monthly borrower principal and interest payments, maintaining escrow deposits, performing loss mitigation and foreclosure activities, and, in certain instances, funding of servicing advances. Servicing advances, which are reimbursable, are recognized in Other

assets at cost and are made for principal and interest and collateral protection.

We earn servicing and other ancillary fees for our role as servicer and, depending on the contractual terms of the servicing arrangement, we can be terminated as servicer with or without cause. At the consummation date of each type of loan transfer, we recognize a servicing right at fair value. Servicing rights are recognized in Other intangible assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheet and when subsequently accounted for at fair value are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. See Note 9 Fair Value and Note 10 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets for further discussion of our residential and commercial servicing rights.

Certain loans transferred to the Agencies contain removal of account provisions (ROAPs). Under these ROAPs, we hold an option to repurchase at par individual delinquent loans that meet certain criteria. When we have the unilateral ability to repurchase a delinquent loan, effective control over the loan has been regained and we recognize an asset (in either Loans or Loans held for sale) and a corresponding liability (in Other borrowed funds) on the balance sheet regardless of our intent to repurchase the loan. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the balance of our ROAP asset and liability totaled $149 million and $190 million, respectively.

The Agency and Non-agency mortgage-backed securities issued by the securitization SPEs that are purchased and held on our balance sheet are typically purchased in the secondary market. PNC does not retain any credit risk on its Agency mortgage-backed security positions as FNMA, FHLMC, and the U.S. Government (for GNMA) guarantee losses of principal and interest. Substantially all of the Non-agency mortgage-backed securities acquired and held on our balance sheet are senior tranches in the securitization structure.

We also have involvement with certain Agency and Non-agency commercial securitization SPEs where we have not transferred commercial mortgage loans. These SPEs were sponsored by independent third-parties and the loans held by these entities were purchased exclusively from other third-parties. Generally, our involvement with these SPEs is as servicer with servicing activities consistent with those described above.

We recognize a liability for our loss exposure associated with contractual obligations to repurchase previously transferred loans due to breaches of representations and warranties and also for loss sharing arrangements (recourse obligations) with the Agencies. Other than providing temporary liquidity under servicing advances and our loss exposure associated with our repurchase and recourse obligations, we have not provided nor are we required to provide any type of credit support, guarantees, or commitments to the securitization SPEs or third-party investors in these transactions. See Note 18 Commitments and Guarantees for further discussion of our repurchase and recourse obligations.

 

 

86    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

The following table provides information related to certain financial information and cash flows associated with PNC’s loan sale and servicing activities:

Table 59: Certain Financial Information and Cash Flows Associated with Loan Sale and Servicing Activities

 

In millions    Residential
Mortgages
     Commercial
Mortgages (a)
     Home Equity
Loans/Lines (b)
 

FINANCIAL INFORMATION – June 30, 2013

          

Servicing portfolio (c)

   $ 115,740       $ 166,356       $ 5,176   

Carrying value of servicing assets (d)

     975         525        

Servicing advances (e)

     558         502         5   

Repurchase and recourse obligations (f)

     523         37         24   

Carrying value of mortgage-backed securities held (g)

     4,503         1,528            

FINANCIAL INFORMATION – December 31, 2012

          

Servicing portfolio (c)

   $ 119,262       $ 153,193       $ 5,353   

Carrying value of servicing assets (d)

     650         420        

Servicing advances (e)

     582         505         5   

Repurchase and recourse obligations (f)

     614         43         58   

Carrying value of mortgage-backed securities held (g)

     5,445         1,533            

 

In millions    Residential
Mortgages
    Commercial
Mortgages (a)
     Home Equity
Loans/Lines (b)
 

CASH FLOWS – Three months ended June 30, 2013

         

Sales of loans (h)

   $     4,190      $ 489        

Repurchases of previously transferred loans (i)

     278         $ 2   

Servicing fees (j)

     89        43         5   

Servicing advances recovered/(funded), net

     30        8         (1

Cash flows on mortgage-backed securities held (g)

     389        70            

CASH FLOWS – Three months ended June 30, 2012

         

Sales of loans (h)

   $ 2,939      $ 468        

Repurchases of previously transferred loans (i)

     358         $ 6   

Servicing fees (j)

     95        46         6   

Servicing advances recovered/(funded), net

     20        13        

Cash flows on mortgage-backed securities held (g)

     283        223            

CASH FLOWS – Six months ended June 30, 2013

         

Sales of loans (h)

   $ 7,994      $     1,415        

Repurchases of previously transferred loans (i)

     650         $ 4   

Servicing fees (j)

     179        89         11   

Servicing advances recovered/(funded), net

     24        3         (1

Cash flows on mortgage-backed securities held (g)

     756        193            

CASH FLOWS – Six months ended June 30, 2012

         

Sales of loans (h)

   $ 6,448      $ 949        

Repurchases of previously transferred loans (i)

     769         $      16   

Servicing fees (j)

     194        91         11   

Servicing advances recovered/(funded), net

     (1     21        

Cash flows on mortgage-backed securities held (g)

     539        352            
(a) Represents financial and cash flow information associated with both commercial mortgage loan transfer and servicing activities.
(b) These activities were part of an acquired brokered home equity lending business in which PNC is no longer engaged. See Note 18 Commitments and Guarantees for further information.
(c) For our continuing involvement with residential mortgage and home equity loan/line transfers, amount represents outstanding balance of loans transferred and serviced. For commercial mortgages, amount represents overall servicing portfolio in which loans have been transferred by us or third parties to VIEs.
(d) See Note 9 Fair Value and Note 10 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets for further information.
(e) Pursuant to certain contractual servicing agreements, represents outstanding balance of funds advanced (i) to investors for monthly collections of borrower principal and interest, (ii) for borrower draws on unused home equity lines of credit, and (iii) for collateral protection associated with the underlying mortgage collateral.

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    87


Table of Contents
(f) Represents liability for our loss exposure associated with loan repurchases for breaches of representations and warranties for our Residential Mortgage Banking and Non-Strategic Assets Portfolio segments, and our commercial mortgage loss share arrangements for our Corporate & Institutional Banking segment. See Note 18 Commitments and Guarantees for further information.
(g) Represents securities held where PNC transferred to and/or services loans for a securitization SPE and we hold securities issued by that SPE.
(h) There were no gains or losses recognized on the transaction date for sales of residential mortgage loans as these loans are recognized on the balance sheet at fair value. For transfers of commercial mortgage loans not recognized on the balance sheet at fair value, gains/losses recognized on sales of these loans were $20 million and $18 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012, respectively, and $43 million and $15 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012, respectively.
(i) Includes government insured or guaranteed loans repurchased through the exercise of our ROAP option and loans repurchased due to breaches of origination covenants or representations and warranties made to purchasers.
(j) Includes contractually specified servicing fees, late charges and ancillary fees.

Variable Interest Entities (VIEs)

As discussed in our 2012 Form 10-K, we are involved with various entities in the normal course of business that are deemed to be VIEs. The following provides a summary of VIEs, including those that we have consolidated and those in which we hold variable interests but have not consolidated into our financial statements as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

Table 60: Consolidated VIEs – Carrying Value (a) (b)

 

June 30, 2013

In millions

   Market Street      Credit Card and Other
Securitization Trusts  (c)
     Tax Credit
Investments
     Total  

Assets

             

Cash and due from banks

         $ 4       $ 4   

Interest-earning deposits with banks

           6         6   

Investment securities

   $ 7               7   

Loans

     6,116       $ 1,729            7,845   

Allowance for loan and lease losses

        (64         (64

Equity investments

           492         492   

Other assets (d)

     6         27         534         567   

Total assets

   $ 6,129       $ 1,692       $ 1,036       $ 8,857   

Liabilities

             

Commercial paper

   $ 5,900             $ 5,900   

Other borrowed funds

      $ 195       $ 239         434   

Accrued expenses

           120         120   

Other liabilities

     223                  155         378   

Total liabilities

   $ 6,123       $ 195       $ 514       $ 6,832   

 

December 31, 2012

In millions

   Market Street      Credit Card
Securitization Trust (e)
     Tax Credit
Investments
     Total  

Assets

             

Cash and due from banks

         $ 4       $ 4   

Interest-earning deposits with banks

           6         6   

Investment securities

   $ 9               9   

Loans

     6,038       $ 1,743            7,781   

Allowance for loan and lease losses

        (75         (75

Equity investments

           1,429         1,429   

Other assets

     536         31         714         1,281   

Total assets

   $ 6,583       $ 1,699       $ 2,153       $ 10,435   

Liabilities

             

Commercial paper

   $ 6,045             $ 6,045   

Other borrowed funds

         $ 257         257   

Accrued expenses

           132         132   

Other liabilities

     529                  447         976   

Total liabilities

   $ 6,574                $ 836       $ 7,410   
(a) Amounts represent carrying value on PNC’s Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(b) Difference between total assets and total liabilities represents the equity portion of the VIE or intercompany assets and liabilities which are eliminated in consolidation.
(c) During the first quarter of 2013, PNC consolidated a Non-agency securitization trust due to modification of contractual provisions.
(d) During the second quarter of 2013, certain Market Street amounts previously classified in “Other assets” were reclassified to “Loans”.
(e) During the first quarter of 2012, the last securitization series issued by the SPE matured, resulting in the zero balance of liabilities at December 31, 2012.

 

88    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

Table 61: Assets and Liabilities of Consolidated VIEs (a)

 

In millions    Aggregate
Assets
     Aggregate
Liabilities
 

June 30, 2013

       

Market Street

   $ 7,322       $ 7,322   

Credit Card and Other Securitization Trusts

     1,978         195   

Tax Credit Investments

     1,045         544   
 

December 31, 2012

       

Market Street

   $ 7,796       $ 7,796   

Credit Card Securitization Trust

     1,782        

Tax Credit Investments

     2,162         853   
(a) Amounts in this table differ from total assets and liabilities in the preceding “Consolidated VIEs – Carrying Value” table due to the elimination of intercompany assets and liabilities in the preceding table.

Table 62: Non-Consolidated VIEs

 

In millions    Aggregate
Assets
     Aggregate
Liabilities
     PNC Risk
of Loss
     Carrying
Value of
Assets
     Carrying
Value of
Liabilities
 

June 30, 2013

                

Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securitizations (a)

   $ 71,374       $ 71,374       $ 1,836       $ 1,836  (c)      

Residential Mortgage-Backed Securitizations (a)

     35,798         35,798         4,516         4,516  (c)     $ (e) 

Tax Credit Investments and Other (b)

     6,564         2,093         1,405         1,405  (d)       644  (e) 

Total

   $ 113,736       $ 109,265       $ 7,757       $ 7,757        $ 651    

 

In millions    Aggregate
Assets
     Aggregate
Liabilities
     PNC Risk
of Loss
     Carrying
Value of
Assets
     Carrying
Value of
Liabilities
 

December 31, 2012

                

Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securitizations (a)

   $ 72,370       $ 72,370       $ 1,829       $ 1,829  (c)      

Residential Mortgage-Backed Securitizations (a)

     42,719         42,719         5,456         5,456  (c)     $ 90  (e) 

Tax Credit Investments and Other (b)

     5,960         2,101         1,283         1,283  (d)       623  (e) 

Total

   $ 121,049       $ 117,190       $ 8,568       $ 8,568        $ 713    
(a) Amounts reflect involvement with securitization SPEs where PNC transferred to and/or services loans for an SPE and we hold securities issued by that SPE. Asset amounts equal outstanding liability amounts of the SPEs due to limited availability of SPE financial information. We also invest in other mortgage and asset-backed securities issued by third-party VIEs with which we have no continuing involvement. Further information on these securities is included in Note 8 Investment Securities and values disclosed represent our maximum exposure to loss for those securities’ holdings.
(b) Aggregate assets and aggregate liabilities are based on limited availability of financial information associated with certain acquired partnerships.
(c) Included in Trading securities, Investment securities, Other intangible assets, and Other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(d) Included in Equity investments on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(e) Included in Other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    89


Table of Contents

Market Street

Market Street Funding LLC (Market Street), owned by an independent third-party, is a multi-seller asset-backed commercial paper conduit that primarily purchases assets or makes loans secured by interests in pools of receivables from U.S. corporations. Market Street funds the purchases of assets or loans by issuing commercial paper. Market Street is supported by pool-specific credit enhancements, liquidity facilities, and a program-level credit enhancement. Generally, Market Street mitigates its potential interest rate risk by entering into agreements with its borrowers that reflect interest rates based upon its weighted-average commercial paper cost of funds. During 2012 and the first six months of 2013, Market Street met all of its funding needs through the issuance of commercial paper.

PNC Bank, National Association, (PNC Bank, N.A.) provides certain administrative services, the program-level credit enhancement and liquidity facilities to Market Street in exchange for fees negotiated based on market rates. The program-level credit enhancement covers net losses in the amount of 10% of commitments, excluding explicitly rated AAA/Aaa facilities. Coverage is a cash collateral account funded by a loan facility. This facility expires in June 2018. At June 30, 2013, $1.2 billion was outstanding on this facility.

Although the commercial paper obligations at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were supported by Market Street’s assets, PNC Bank, N.A. may be obligated to fund Market Street under the $11.4 billion of liquidity facilities for events such as commercial paper market disruptions, borrower bankruptcies, collateral deficiencies or covenant violations. Our credit risk under the liquidity facilities is secondary to the risk of first loss absorbed by Market Street borrowers through over-collateralization of assets and losses absorbed by deal-specific credit enhancement provided by a third party. The deal-specific credit enhancement is generally structured to cover a multiple of expected losses for the pool of assets and is sized to meet rating agency standards for comparably structured transactions.

Through the credit enhancement and liquidity facility arrangements, PNC Bank, N.A. has the power to direct the activities of Market Street that most significantly affect its economic performance and these arrangements expose PNC Bank, N.A. to expected losses or residual returns that are potentially significant to Market Street. Therefore, PNC Bank, N.A. consolidates Market Street. PNC Bank, N.A. is not required to nor have we provided additional financial support to Market Street and Market Street creditors have no direct recourse to PNC Bank, N.A.

Credit Card Securitization Trust

We were the sponsor of several credit card securitizations facilitated through a trust. This bankruptcy-remote SPE was established to purchase credit card receivables from the sponsor and to issue and sell asset-backed securities created

by it to independent third-parties. The SPE was financed primarily through the sale of these asset-backed securities. These transactions were originally structured to provide liquidity and to afford favorable capital treatment.

Our continuing involvement in these securitization transactions consisted primarily of holding certain retained interests and acting as the primary servicer. For each securitization series that was outstanding, our retained interests held were in the form of a pro-rata undivided interest, or sellers’ interest, in the transferred receivables, subordinated tranches of asset-backed securities, interest-only strips, discount receivables, and subordinated interests in accrued interest and fees in securitized receivables. We consolidated the SPE as we were deemed the primary beneficiary of the entity based upon our level of continuing involvement. Our role as primary servicer gave us the power to direct the activities of the SPE that most significantly affect its economic performance and our holding of retained interests gave us the obligation to absorb expected losses, or the ability to receive residual returns that could be potentially significant to the SPE. The underlying assets of the consolidated SPE were restricted only for payment of the beneficial interests issued by the SPE. We were not required to nor did we provide additional financial support to the SPE. Additionally, creditors of the SPE have no direct recourse to PNC.

During the first quarter of 2012, the last series issued by the SPE, Series 2007-1, matured. At June 30, 2013, the SPE continued to exist and we consolidated the entity as we continued to be the primary beneficiary of the SPE through our holding of seller’s interest and our role as the primary servicer.

Tax Credit Investments

We make certain equity investments in various tax credit limited partnerships or limited liability companies (LLCs). The purpose of these investments is to achieve a satisfactory return on capital and to assist us in achieving goals associated with the Community Reinvestment Act.

Also, we are a national syndicator of affordable housing equity. In these syndication transactions, we create funds in which our subsidiaries are the general partner or managing member and sell limited partnership or non-managing member interests to third parties. In some cases PNC may also purchase a limited partnership or non-managing member interest in the fund. The purpose of this business is to generate income from the syndication of these funds, generate servicing fees by managing the funds, and earn tax credits to reduce our tax liability. General partner or managing member activities include selecting, evaluating, structuring, negotiating, and closing the fund investments in operating limited partnerships or LLCs, as well as oversight of the ongoing operations of the fund portfolio.

Typically, the general partner or managing member will be the party that has the right to make decisions that will most

 

 

90    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

significantly impact the economic performance of the entity. However, certain partnership or LLC agreements provide the limited partner or non-managing member the ability to remove the general partner or managing member without cause. This results in the limited partner or non-managing member being the party that has the right to make decisions that will most significantly impact the economic performance of the entity. The primary sources of losses and benefits for these investments are the tax credits and tax benefits due to passive losses on the investments. We have consolidated investments in which we have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s performance, and have an obligation to absorb expected losses or receive benefits that could be potentially significant. The assets are primarily included in Equity investments and Other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheet with the liabilities classified in Other borrowed funds, Accrued expenses, and Other liabilities and the third party investors’ interests included in the Equity section as Noncontrolling interests. Neither creditors nor equity investors in these investments have any recourse to our general credit. We have not provided financial support to the limited partnership or LLC that we are not contractually obligated to provide. The consolidated aggregate assets and liabilities of these investments are provided in the Consolidated VIEs table and reflected in the “Other” business segment.

For tax credit investments in which we do not have the right to make decisions that will most significantly impact the economic performance of the entity, we are not the primary beneficiary and thus they are not consolidated. These investments are disclosed in Table 62: Non-Consolidated VIEs. The table also reflects our maximum exposure to loss exclusive of any potential tax credit recapture. Our maximum exposure to loss is equal to our legally binding equity commitments adjusted for recorded impairment and partnership results. We use the equity method to account for our investment in these entities with the investments reflected in Equity investments on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. In addition, we increase our recognized investments and recognize a liability for all legally binding unfunded equity commitments. These liabilities are reflected in Other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

During the second quarter of 2013, PNC sold limited partnership or non-managing member interests previously held in certain consolidated funds. As a result, PNC no longer met the consolidation criteria for those investments and deconsolidated approximately $675 million of net assets related to the funds.

Residential and Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securitizations

In connection with each Agency and Non-agency securitization discussed above, we evaluate each SPE utilized in these transactions for consolidation. In performing these assessments, we evaluate our level of continuing involvement in these transactions as the nature of our involvement ultimately determines whether or not we hold a variable interest and/or are the primary beneficiary of the SPE. Factors we consider in our consolidation assessment include the significance of (i) our role as servicer, (ii) our holdings of mortgage-backed securities issued by the securitization SPE, and (iii) the rights of third-party variable interest holders.

The first step in our assessment is to determine whether we hold a variable interest in the securitization SPE. We hold variable interests in Agency and Non-agency securitization SPEs through our holding of mortgage-backed securities issued by the SPEs and/or our recourse obligations. Each SPE in which we hold a variable interest is evaluated to determine whether we are the primary beneficiary of the entity. For Agency securitization transactions, our contractual role as servicer does not give us the power to direct the activities that most significantly affect the economic performance of the SPEs. Thus, we are not the primary beneficiary of these entities. For Non-agency securitization transactions, we would be the primary beneficiary to the extent our servicing activities give us the power to direct the activities that most significantly affect the economic performance of the SPE and we hold a more than insignificant variable interest in the entity.

In the first quarter 2013, contractual provisions of a Non-agency securitization were modified resulting in PNC being deemed the primary beneficiary of the securitization. As a result, we consolidated the SPE and recorded the SPE’s home equity line of credit assets and associated beneficial interest liabilities and are continuing to account for these instruments at fair value. These balances are included within the Credit Card and Other Securitization Trusts balances line in Table 60: Consolidated VIEs – Carrying Value and Table 61: Assets and Liabilities of Consolidated VIEs. We are not required to provide additional support to the SPE. Additionally, creditors of the SPE have no direct recourse to PNC.

Details about the Agency and Non-agency securitization SPEs where we hold a variable interest and are not the primary beneficiary are included in Table 62: Non-Consolidated VIEs. Our maximum exposure to loss as a result of our involvement with these SPEs is the carrying value of the mortgage-backed securities, servicing assets, servicing advances, and our liabilities associated with our recourse obligations. Creditors of the securitization SPEs have no recourse to PNC’s assets or general credit.

 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    91


Table of Contents

NOTE 4 LOANS AND COMMITMENTS TO EXTEND CREDIT

Loans outstanding were as follows:

Table 63: Loans Outstanding

 

In millions   

June 30

2013

     December 31
2012
 

Commercial lending

       

Commercial

   $ 86,930       $ 83,040   

Commercial real estate

     18,991         18,655   

Equipment lease financing

     7,349         7,247   

Total commercial lending

     113,270         108,942   

Consumer lending

       

Home equity

     36,416         35,920   

Residential real estate

     14,777         15,240   

Credit card

     4,135         4,303   

Other consumer

     21,177         21,451   

Total consumer lending

     76,505         76,914   

Total loans (a) (b)

   $ 189,775       $ 185,856   
(a) Net of unearned income, net deferred loan fees, unamortized discounts and premiums, and purchase discounts and premiums totaling $2.3 billion and $2.7 billion at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.
(b) Future accretable yield related to purchased impaired loans is not included in loans outstanding.

At June 30, 2013, we pledged $22.9 billion of commercial loans to the Federal Reserve Bank and $45.5 billion of residential real estate and other loans to the Federal Home Loan Bank as collateral for the contingent ability to borrow, if necessary. The comparable amounts at December 31, 2012 were $23.2 billion and $37.3 billion, respectively.

Table 64: Net Unfunded Credit Commitments

 

In millions   

June 30

2013

     December 31
2012
 

Commercial and commercial real estate

   $ 82,790       $ 78,703   

Home equity lines of credit

     19,325         19,814   

Credit card

     17,101         17,381   

Other

     4,926         4,694   

Total (a)

   $ 124,142       $ 120,592   
(a) Excludes standby letters of credit. See Note 18 Commitments and Guarantees for additional information on standby letters of credit.

Commitments to extend credit represent arrangements to lend funds or provide liquidity subject to specified contractual conditions. At June 30, 2013, commercial commitments reported above exclude $23.5 billion of syndications, assignments and participations, primarily to financial institutions. The comparable amount at December 31, 2012 was $22.5 billion.

Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates, may require payment of a fee, and contain termination clauses in the event the customer’s credit quality deteriorates. Based on our historical experience, most commitments expire unfunded, and therefore cash requirements are substantially less than the total commitment.

NOTE 5 ASSET QUALITY

Asset Quality

We closely monitor economic conditions and loan performance trends to manage and evaluate our exposure to credit risk. Trends in delinquency rates may be a key indicator, among other considerations, of credit risk within the loan portfolios. The measurement of delinquency status is based on the contractual terms of each loan. Loans that are 30 days or more past due in terms of payment are considered delinquent. Loan delinquencies exclude loans held for sale and purchased impaired loans, but include government insured or guaranteed loans and loans accounted for under the fair value option.

The trends in nonperforming assets represent another key indicator of the potential for future credit losses. Nonperforming assets include nonperforming loans, OREO and foreclosed assets. Nonperforming loans are those loans accounted for at amortized cost that have deteriorated in credit quality to the extent that full collection of contractual principal and interest is not probable. Interest income is not recognized on these loans. Loans accounted for under the fair value option are reported as performing loans as these loans are accounted for at fair value. However, based upon the nonaccrual policies discussed within Note 1 Accounting Policies, interest income is not recognized. Additionally, certain government insured or guaranteed loans for which we expect to collect substantially all principal and interest are not reported as nonperforming loans and continue to accrue interest. Purchased impaired loans are excluded from nonperforming as we are currently accreting interest income over the expected life of the loans. See Note 6 Purchased Loans for further information.

See Note 1 Accounting Policies for additional delinquency, nonperforming, and charge-off information.

 

 

92    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

The following tables display the delinquency status of our loans and our nonperforming assets at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Table 65: Age Analysis of Past Due Accruing Loans (a)

 

    Accruing                              
In millions  

Current or

Less

Than 30

Days

Past Due

   

30-59

Days
Past Due

    60-89 Days
Past Due
    90 Days
Or More
Past Due
    Total Past
Due (b)
    Nonperforming
Loans
   

Fair Value

Option
Nonaccrual
Loans (c)

    Purchased
Impaired
   

Total

Loans

 

June 30, 2013

                             

Commercial

  $ 86,009      $ 85      $ 53      $ 31      $ 169      $ 521          $ 231      $ 86,930   

Commercial real estate

    17,527        66        22            88        639            737        18,991   

Equipment lease financing

    7,336        2        4            6        7                7,349   

Home equity (d)

    32,707        76        29            105        1,131            2,473        36,416   

Residential real estate (d) (e)

    8,464        230        108        1,376        1,714        962      $ 301        3,336        14,777   

Credit card

    4,052        27        19        33        79        4                4,135   

Other consumer (d) (f)

    20,483        200        114        322        636        57                1        21,177   

Total

  $ 176,578      $ 686      $ 349      $ 1,762      $ 2,797      $ 3,321      $ 301      $ 6,778      $ 189,775   

Percentage of total loans

    93.05     .36     .18     .93     1.47     1.75     .16     3.57     100.00

December 31, 2012

                             

Commercial

  $ 81,930      $ 115      $ 55      $ 42      $ 212      $ 590          $ 308      $ 83,040   

Commercial real estate

    16,735        100        57        15        172        807            941        18,655   

Equipment lease financing

    7,214        17        1        2        20        13                7,247   

Home equity

    32,174        117        58            175        951            2,620        35,920   

Residential real estate (e)

    8,464        278        146        1,901        2,325        845      $ 70        3,536        15,240   

Credit card

    4,205        34        23        36        93        5                4,303   

Other consumer (f)

    20,663        258        131        355        744        43                1        21,451   

Total

  $ 171,385      $ 919      $ 471      $ 2,351      $ 3,741      $ 3,254      $ 70      $ 7,406      $ 185,856   

Percentage of total loans

    92.21     .49     .25     1.26     2.00     1.75     .05     3.99     100.00
(a) Amounts in table represent recorded investment and exclude loans held for sale.
(b) Past due loan amounts exclude purchased impaired loans, even if contractually past due (or if we do not expect to receive payment in full based on the original contractual terms), as we are currently accreting interest income over the expected life of the loans.
(c) Consumer loans accounted for under the fair value option which we do not expect to collect substantially all principal and interest are subject to nonaccrual accounting and classification upon meeting any of our nonaccrual policies. Given that these loans are not accounted for at amortized cost, these loans have been excluded from the nonperforming loan population.
(d) Pursuant to alignment with interagency supervisory guidance on practices for loans and lines of credit related to consumer lending in the first quarter of 2013, accruing consumer loans past due 30 – 59 days decreased $44 million, accruing consumer loans past due 60 – 89 days decreased $36 million and accruing consumer loans past due 90 days or more decreased $315 million, of which $295 million related to Residential real estate government insured loans. As part of this alignment, these loans were moved into nonaccrual status.
(e) Past due loan amounts at June 30, 2013, include government insured or guaranteed Residential real estate mortgages, totaling $.1 billion for 30 to 59 days past due, $.1 billion for 60 to 89 days past due and $1.3 billion for 90 days or more past due. Past due loan amounts at December 31, 2012, include government insured or guaranteed Residential real estate mortgages, totaling $.1 billion for 30 to 59 days past due, $.1 billion for 60 to 89 days past due and $1.9 billion for 90 days or more past due.
(f) Past due loan amounts at June 30, 2013, include government insured or guaranteed Other consumer loans, totaling $.1 billion for 30 to 59 days past due, $.1 billion for 60 to 89 days past due and $.3 billion for 90 days or more past due. Past due loan amounts at December 31, 2012, include government insured or guaranteed Other consumer loans, totaling $.2 billion for 30 to 59 days past due, $.1 billion for 60 to 89 days past due and $.3 billion for 90 days or more past due.

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    93


Table of Contents

Table 66: Nonperforming Assets

 

Dollars in millions    June 30
2013
    December 31
2012
 

Nonperforming loans

      

Commercial lending

      

Commercial

   $ 521      $ 590   

Commercial real estate

     639        807   

Equipment lease financing

     7        13   

Total commercial lending

     1,167        1,410   

Consumer lending (a)

      

Home equity (b)

     1,131        951   

Residential real estate (b)

     962        845   

Credit card

     4        5   

Other consumer (b)

     57        43   

Total consumer lending

     2,154        1,844   

Total nonperforming loans (c)

     3,321        3,254   

OREO and foreclosed assets

      

Other real estate owned (OREO) (d)

     432        507   

Foreclosed and other assets

     25        33   

Total OREO and foreclosed assets

     457        540   

Total nonperforming assets

   $ 3,778      $ 3,794   

Nonperforming loans to total loans

     1.75     1.75

Nonperforming assets to total loans, OREO and foreclosed assets

     1.99        2.04   

Nonperforming assets to total assets

     1.24        1.24   
(a) Excludes most consumer loans and lines of credit, not secured by residential real estate, which are charged off after 120 to 180 days past due and are not placed on nonperforming status.
(b) Pursuant to alignment with interagency supervisory guidance on practices for loans and lines of credit related to consumer lending in the first quarter of 2013, nonperforming home equity loans increased $214 million, nonperforming residential mortgage loans increased $187 million and nonperforming other consumer loans increased $25 million. Charge-offs have been taken on these loans where the fair value less costs to sell the collateral was less than the recorded investment of the loan and were $134 million.
(c) Nonperforming loans exclude certain government insured or guaranteed loans, loans held for sale, loans accounted for under the fair value option and purchased impaired loans.
(d) OREO excludes $311 million and $380 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, related to residential real estate that was acquired by us upon foreclosure of serviced loans because they are insured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) or guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).

 

Nonperforming loans also include certain loans whose terms have been restructured in a manner that grants a concession to a borrower experiencing financial difficulties. In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, these loans are considered TDRs. See Note 1 Accounting Policies and the TDR section of this Note 5 for additional information. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, $1.7 billion of loans held for sale, loans accounted for under the fair value option, pooled purchased impaired loans, as well as certain consumer government insured or guaranteed loans which were evaluated for TDR consideration, are not classified as TDRs. The comparable amount for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $1.6 billion.

Total nonperforming loans in the nonperforming assets table above include TDRs of $1.5 billion at June 30, 2013 and $1.6 billion at December 31, 2012. TDRs returned to performing (accruing) status totaled $1.1 billion and $1.0 billion at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, and are excluded from nonperforming loans. Generally, these loans have demonstrated a period of at least six months of consecutive performance under the restructured terms. Loans

where borrowers have been discharged from personal liability through Chapter 7 bankruptcy and have not formally reaffirmed their loan obligation to PNC are not returned to accrual status. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, remaining commitments to lend additional funds to debtors in a commercial or consumer TDR were immaterial.

Additional Asset Quality Indicators

We have two overall portfolio segments – Commercial Lending and Consumer Lending. Each of these two segments is comprised of multiple loan classes. Classes are characterized by similarities in initial measurement, risk attributes and the manner in which we monitor and assess credit risk. The commercial segment is comprised of the commercial, commercial real estate, equipment lease financing, and commercial purchased impaired loan classes. The consumer segment is comprised of the home equity, residential real estate, credit card, other consumer, and consumer purchased impaired loan classes. Asset quality indicators for each of these loan classes are discussed in more detail below.

 

 

94    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

COMMERCIAL LENDING ASSET CLASSES

Commercial Loan Class

For commercial loans, we monitor the performance of the borrower in a disciplined and regular manner based upon the level of credit risk inherent in the loan. To evaluate the level of credit risk, we assign an internal risk rating reflecting the borrower’s PD and LGD. This two-dimensional credit risk rating methodology provides granularity in the risk monitoring process on an ongoing basis. These ratings are reviewed and updated on a risk-adjusted basis, generally at least once per year. Additionally, on an annual basis, we update PD rates related to each rating grade based upon internal historical data, augmented by market data. For small balance homogenous pools of commercial loans, mortgages and leases, we apply statistical modeling to assist in determining the probability of default within these pools. Further, on a periodic basis, we update our LGD estimates associated with each rating grade based upon historical data. The combination of the PD and LGD ratings assigned to a commercial loan, capturing both the combination of expectations of default and loss severity in event of default, reflects the relative estimated likelihood of loss for that loan at the reporting date. In general, loans with better PD and LGD tend to have a lower likelihood of loss compared to loans with worse PD and LGD which tend to have a higher likelihood of loss. The loss amount also considers exposure at date of default, which we also periodically update based upon historical data.

Based upon the amount of the lending arrangement and our risk rating assessment, we follow a formal schedule of written periodic review. On a quarterly basis, we conduct formal reviews of a market’s or business unit’s entire loan portfolio, focusing on those loans which we perceive to be of higher risk, based upon PDs and LGDs, or loans for which credit quality is weakening. If circumstances warrant, it is our practice to review any customer obligation and its level of credit risk more frequently. We attempt to proactively manage our loans by using various procedures that are customized to the risk of a given loan, including ongoing outreach, contact, and assessment of obligor financial conditions, collateral inspection and appraisal.

Commercial Real Estate Loan Class

We manage credit risk associated with our commercial real estate projects and commercial mortgage activities similar to commercial loans by analyzing PD and LGD. Additionally, risks connected with commercial real estate projects and commercial mortgage activities tend to be correlated to the loan structure and collateral location, project progress and business environment. As a result, these attributes are also monitored and utilized in assessing credit risk.

As with the commercial class, a formal schedule of periodic review is performed to also assess market/geographic risk and business unit/industry risk. Often as a result of these overviews, more in-depth reviews and increased scrutiny is placed on areas of higher risk, including adverse changes in risk ratings, deteriorating operating trends, and/or areas that concern management. These reviews are designed to assess risk and take actions to mitigate our exposure to such risks.

Equipment Lease Financing Loan Class

We manage credit risk associated with our equipment lease financing class similar to commercial loans by analyzing PD and LGD.

Based upon the dollar amount of the lease and of the level of credit risk, we follow a formal schedule of periodic review. Generally, this occurs on a quarterly basis, although we have established practices to review such credit risk more frequently if circumstances warrant. Our review process entails analysis of the following factors: equipment value/residual value, exposure levels, jurisdiction risk, industry risk, guarantor requirements, and regulatory compliance.

Commercial Purchased Impaired Loans Class

The credit impacts of purchased impaired loans are primarily determined through the estimation of expected cash flows. Commercial cash flow estimates are influenced by a number of credit related items, which include but are not limited to: estimated collateral value, receipt of additional collateral, secondary trading prices, circumstances of possible and/or ongoing liquidation, capital availability, business operations and payment patterns.

We attempt to proactively manage these factors by using various procedures that are customized to the risk of a given loan. These procedures include a review by our Special Asset Committee (SAC), ongoing outreach, contact, and assessment of obligor financial conditions, collateral inspection and appraisal.

See Note 6 Purchased Loans for additional information.

 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    95


Table of Contents

Table 67: Commercial Lending Asset Quality Indicators (a)

 

             Criticized Commercial Loans          
In millions    Pass
Rated (b)
     Special
Mention (c)
     Substandard (d)      Doubtful (e)     

Total

Loans

 

June 30, 2013

                

Commercial

   $ 82,619       $ 1,607       $ 2,363       $ 110       $ 86,699   

Commercial real estate

     16,344         399         1,382         129         18,254   

Equipment lease financing

     7,169         99         79         2         7,349   

Purchased impaired loans

     31         42         732         163         968   

Total commercial lending (f) (g)

   $ 106,163       $ 2,147       $ 4,556       $ 404       $ 113,270   

December 31, 2012

                

Commercial

   $ 78,048       $ 1,939       $ 2,600       $ 145       $ 82,732   

Commercial real estate

     14,898         804         1,802         210         17,714   

Equipment lease financing

     7,062         68         112         5         7,247   

Purchased impaired loans

     49         60         852         288         1,249   

Total commercial lending (f)

   $ 100,057       $ 2,871       $ 5,366       $ 648       $ 108,942   
(a) Based upon PDs and LGDs.
(b) Pass Rated loans include loans not classified as “Special Mention”, “Substandard”, or “Doubtful”.
(c) Special Mention rated loans have a potential weakness that deserves management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of repayment prospects at some future date. These loans do not expose us to sufficient risk to warrant a more adverse classification at this time.
(d) Substandard rated loans have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the collection or liquidation of debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that we will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.
(e) Doubtful rated loans possess all the inherent weaknesses of a Substandard loan with the additional characteristics that the weakness makes collection or liquidation in full improbable due to existing facts, conditions, and values.
(f) Loans are included above based on their contractual terms as “Pass”, “Special Mention”, “Substandard” or “Doubtful”.
(g) We began to refine our process for categorizing commercial loans in the second quarter of 2013 in order to apply a split rating classification to certain loans meeting threshold criteria. By assigning split classifications, a loan’s exposure amount may be split into more than one classification category in the above table. This refinement is expected to be completed by the fourth quarter of 2013.

 

CONSUMER LENDING ASSET CLASSES

HOME EQUITY AND RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE LOAN CLASSES

We use several credit quality indicators, including delinquency information, nonperforming loan information, updated credit scores, originated and updated LTV ratios, and geography, to monitor and manage credit risk within the home equity and residential real estate loan classes. We evaluate mortgage loan performance by source originators and loan servicers. A summary of asset quality indicators follows:

Delinquency/Delinquency Rates: We monitor trending of delinquency/delinquency rates for home equity and residential real estate loans. See the Asset Quality section of this Note 5 for additional information.

Nonperforming Loans: We monitor trending of nonperforming loans for home equity and residential real estate loans. See the Asset Quality section of this Note 5 for additional information.

Credit Scores: We use a national third-party provider to update FICO credit scores for home equity loans and lines of credit and residential real estate loans on at least a quarterly basis. The updated scores are incorporated into a series of credit management reports, which are utilized to monitor the risk in the loan classes.

LTV (inclusive of combined loan-to-value (CLTV) for first and subordinate lien positions): At least semi-annually, we update the property values of real estate collateral and calculate an updated LTV ratio. For open-end credit lines secured by real estate in regions experiencing significant declines in property values, more frequent valuations may occur. We examine LTV migration and stratify LTV into categories to monitor the risk in the loan classes.

Historically, we used, and we continue to use, a combination of original LTV and updated LTV for internal risk management reporting and risk management purposes (e.g., line management, loss mitigation strategies). In addition to the fact that estimated property values by their nature are estimates, given certain data limitations it is important to note that updated LTVs may be based upon management’s assumptions (e.g., if an updated LTV is not provided by the third-party service provider, home price index (HPI) changes will be incorporated in arriving at management’s estimate of updated LTV).

Geography: Geographic concentrations are monitored to evaluate and manage exposures. Loan purchase programs are sensitive to, and focused within, certain regions to manage geographic exposures and associated risks.

 

 

96    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

A combination of updated FICO scores, originated and updated LTV ratios and geographic location assigned to home equity loans and lines of credit and residential real estate loans is used to monitor the risk in the loan classes. Loans with higher FICO scores and lower LTVs tend to have a lower level of risk. Conversely, loans with lower FICO scores, higher LTVs, and in certain geographic locations tend to have a higher level of risk.

In the first quarter of 2013, we refined our process for the Home Equity and Residential Real Estate Asset Quality Indicators shown in the following tables. These refinements include, but are not limited to, improvements in the process for determining lien position and LTV in both Table 69: Home Equity and Residential Real Estate Asset Quality Indicators – Excluding Purchased Impaired Loans and Table 70: Home Equity and Residential Real Estate Asset Quality Indicators – Purchased Impaired Loans. Additionally, we are now presenting Table 69 at recorded investment as opposed to our prior presentation of outstanding balance. Table 70 continues to be presented at outstanding balance. Both the 2013 and

2012 period end balance disclosures are presented in the below tables using this refined process.

Table 68: Home Equity and Residential Real Estate Balances

 

In millions    June 30
2013
     December 31
2012
 

Home equity and residential real estate loans – excluding purchased impaired loans (a)

   $ 43,372       $ 42,725   

Home equity and residential real estate loans – purchased impaired loans (b)

     6,094         6,638   

Government insured or guaranteed residential real estate mortgages (a)

     2,012         2,279   

Purchase accounting adjustments – purchased impaired loans

     (285      (482

Total home equity and residential real estate loans (a)

   $ 51,193       $ 51,160   
(a) Represents recorded investment.
(b) Represents outstanding balance.
 

 

Table 69: Home Equity and Residential Real Estate Asset Quality Indicators – Excluding Purchased Impaired Loans (a) (b)

 

     Home Equity      Residential Real Estate          
June 30, 2013 – in millions    1st Liens      2nd Liens              Total  

Current estimated LTV ratios (c) (d)

                 

Greater than or equal to 125% and updated FICO scores:

                 

Greater than 660

   $ 455       $ 2,446       $ 778       $ 3,679   

Less than or equal to 660 (e) (f)

     74         492         245         811   

Missing FICO

     1         10         26         37   
     

Greater than or equal to 100% to less than 125% and updated FICO scores:

                 

Greater than 660

     1,057         3,308         1,212         5,577   

Less than or equal to 660 (e) (f)

     162         560         244         966   

Missing FICO

     2         6         34         42   
     

Greater than or equal to 90% to less than 100% and updated FICO scores:

                 

Greater than 660

     1,076         2,095         838         4,009   

Less than or equal to 660

     137         308         148         593   

Missing FICO

     2         5         25         32   
     

Less than 90% and updated FICO scores:

                 

Greater than 660

     12,360         7,151         4,994         24,505   

Less than or equal to 660

     1,256         942         637         2,835   

Missing FICO

     24         14         248         286   

Total home equity and residential real estate loans

   $ 16,606       $ 17,337       $ 9,429       $ 43,372   

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    97


Table of Contents
     Home Equity      Residential Real Estate          
December 31, 2012 – in millions    1st Liens      2nd Liens              Total  

Current estimated LTV ratios (c)

                 

Greater than or equal to 125% and updated FICO scores:

                 

Greater than 660

   $ 470       $ 2,772       $ 667       $ 3,909   

Less than or equal to 660 (d) (e)

     84         589         211         884   

Missing FICO

     1         10         19         30   
     

Greater than or equal to 100% to less than 125% and updated FICO scores:

                 

Greater than 660

     1,027         3,636         1,290         5,953   

Less than or equal to 660 (d) (e)

     159         641         253         1,053   

Missing FICO

     3         6         45         54   
     

Greater than or equal to 90% to less than 100% and updated FICO scores:

                 

Greater than 660

     1,056         2,229         1,120         4,405   

Less than or equal to 660

     130         319         164         613   

Missing FICO

     1         5         23         29   
     

Less than 90% and updated FICO scores:

                 

Greater than 660

     10,736         7,255         4,701         22,692   

Less than or equal to 660

     1,214         921         621         2,756   

Missing FICO

     23         13         269         305   
     

Missing LTV and updated FICO scores:

                 

Missing FICO

                       42         42   

Total home equity and residential real estate loans

   $ 14,904       $ 18,396       $ 9,425       $ 42,725   
(a) Excludes purchased impaired loans of approximately $5.8 billion and $6.2 billion in recorded investment, certain government insured or guaranteed residential real estate mortgages of approximately $2.0 billion and $2.3 billion, and loans held for sale at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. See the Home Equity and Residential Real Estate Asset Quality Indicators – Purchased Impaired Loans table below for additional information on purchased impaired loans.
(b) Amounts shown represent recorded investment.
(c) Based upon updated LTV (inclusive of combined loan-to-value (CLTV) for first and subordinate lien positions). Updated LTV are estimated using modeled property values. These ratios are updated at least semi-annually. The related estimates and inputs are based upon an approach that uses a combination of third-party automated valuation models (AVMs), HPI indices, property location, internal and external balance information, origination data and management assumptions. In cases where we are in an originated second lien position, we generally utilize origination balances provided by a third-party which do not include an amortization assumption when calculating updated LTV. Accordingly, the results of these calculations do not represent actual appraised loan level collateral or updated LTV based upon a current first lien balance, and as such, are necessarily imprecise and subject to change as we enhance our methodology. In the second quarter of 2013, we enhanced our CLTV determination process by further refining the data and correcting certain methodological inconsistencies. As a result, the amounts in the December 31, 2012 table above have been updated.
(d) Higher risk loans are defined as loans with both an updated FICO score of less than or equal to 660 and an updated LTV greater than or equal to 100%.
(e) The following states have the highest percentage of higher risk loans at June 30, 2013: New Jersey 13%, Illinois 12%, Pennsylvania 11%, Ohio 10%, Florida 9%, California 6%, Michigan 6% and Maryland 6%. The remainder of the states have lower than 4% of the high risk loans individually, and collectively they represent approximately 27% of the higher risk loans. The following states had the highest percentage of higher risk loans at December 31, 2012: New Jersey 14%, Illinois 11%, Pennsylvania 11%, Ohio 10%, Florida 9%, California 6%, Maryland 6%, and Michigan 5%. The remainder of the states have lower than 4% of the high risk loans individually, and collectively they represent approximately 28% of the higher risk loans.

 

98    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

Table 70: Home Equity and Residential Real Estate Asset Quality Indicators – Purchased Impaired Loans (a)

 

     Home Equity (b) (c)      Residential Real Estate (b) (c)          
June 30, 2013 – in millions    1st Liens      2nd Liens              Total  

Current estimated LTV ratios (d)

                 

Greater than or equal to 125% and updated FICO scores:

                 

Greater than 660

   $ 15       $ 673       $ 488       $ 1,176   

Less than or equal to 660

     16         316         391         723   

Missing FICO

        17         31         48   
     

Greater than or equal to 100% to less than 125% and updated FICO scores:

                 

Greater than 660

     23         550         390         963   

Less than or equal to 660

     18         246         323         587   

Missing FICO

     1         16         18         35   
     

Greater than or equal to 90% to less than 100% and updated FICO scores:

                 

Greater than 660

     12         145         217         374   

Less than or equal to 660

     13         89         162         264   

Missing FICO

        7         11         18   
     

Less than 90% and updated FICO scores:

                 

Greater than 660

     92         189         626         907   

Less than or equal to 660

     135         169         599         903   

Missing FICO

     1         8         38         47   
     

Missing LTV and updated FICO scores:

                 

Greater than 660

     2              19         21   

Less than or equal to 660

     1              17         18   

Missing FICO

              3         7         10   

Total home equity and residential real estate loans

   $ 329       $ 2,428       $ 3,337       $ 6,094   

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    99


Table of Contents
     Home Equity (b) (c)      Residential Real Estate (b) (c)          
December 31, 2012 – in millions    1st Liens      2nd Liens              Total  

Current estimated LTV ratios (d)

                 

Greater than or equal to 125% and updated FICO scores:

                 

Greater than 660

   $ 17       $ 791       $ 597       $ 1,405   

Less than or equal to 660

     17         405         498         920   

Missing FICO

        23         46         69   
     

Greater than or equal to 100% to less than 125% and updated FICO scores:

                 

Greater than 660

     26         552         435         1,013   

Less than or equal to 660

     20         269         383         672   

Missing FICO

        18         23         41   
     

Greater than or equal to 90% to less than 100% and updated FICO scores:

                 

Greater than 660

     14         140         216         370   

Less than or equal to 660

     14         99         182         295   

Missing FICO

        7         11         18   
     

Less than 90% and updated FICO scores:

                 

Greater than 660

     86         174         589         849   

Less than or equal to 660

     142         163         598         903   

Missing FICO

     2         8         39         49   
     

Missing LTV and updated FICO scores:

                 

Greater than 660

             18         18   

Less than or equal to 660

             7         7   

Missing FICO

                       9         9   

Total home equity and residential real estate loans

   $ 338       $ 2,649       $ 3,651       $ 6,638   
(a) Amounts shown represent outstanding balance. See Note 6 Purchased Loans for additional information.
(b) For the estimate of cash flows utilized in our purchased impaired loan accounting, other assumptions and estimates are made, including amortization of first lien balances, pre-payment rates, etc., which are not reflected in this table.
(c) The following states have the highest percentage of loans at June 30, 2013: California 18%, Florida 15%, Illinois 11%, Ohio 7%, North Carolina 6%, Michigan 5%, and Georgia 4%, respectively. The remainder of the states have lower than a 4% concentration of purchased impaired loans individually, and collectively they represent approximately 34% of the purchased impaired portfolio. The following states have the highest percentage of loans at December 31, 2012: California 18%, Florida 15%, Illinois 12%, Ohio 7%, North Carolina 6% and Michigan 5% The remainder of the states have lower than a 4% concentration of purchased impaired loans individually, and collectively they represent approximately 37% of the purchased impaired portfolio.
(d) Based upon updated LTV (inclusive of combined loan-to-value (CLTV) for first and subordinate lien positions). Updated LTV are estimated using modeled property values. These ratios are updated at least semi-annually. The related estimates and inputs are based upon an approach that uses a combination of third-party automated valuation models (AVMs), HPI indices, property location, internal and external balance information, origination data and management assumptions. In cases where we are in an originated second lien position, we generally utilize origination balances provided by a third-party which do not include an amortization assumption when calculating updated LTV. Accordingly, the results of these calculations do not represent actual appraised loan level collateral or updated LTV based upon a current first lien balance, and as such, are necessarily imprecise and subject to change as we enhance our methodology. In the second quarter of 2013, we enhanced our CLTV determination process by further refining the data and correcting certain methodological inconsistencies. As a result, the amounts in the December 31, 2012 table above have been updated.

CREDIT CARD AND OTHER CONSUMER LOAN CLASSES

We monitor a variety of asset quality information in the management of the credit card and other consumer loan classes. Other consumer loan classes include education, automobile, and other secured and unsecured lines and loans. Along with the trending of delinquencies and losses for each class, FICO credit score updates are generally obtained on a monthly basis, as well as a variety of credit bureau attributes. Loans with high FICO scores tend to have a lower likelihood of loss. Conversely, loans with low FICO scores tend to have a higher likelihood of loss.

 

100    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

CONSUMER PURCHASED IMPAIRED LOANS CLASS

Estimates of the expected cash flows primarily determine the credit impacts of consumer purchased impaired loans. Consumer cash flow estimates are influenced by a number of credit related items, which include, but are not limited to: estimated real estate values, payment patterns, updated FICO scores, the current economic environment, updated LTV ratios and the date of origination. These key factors are monitored to help ensure that concentrations of risk are mitigated and cash flows are maximized.

See Note 6 Purchased Loans for additional information.

Table 71: Credit Card and Other Consumer Loan Classes Asset Quality Indicators

 

     Credit Card (a)      Other Consumer (b)  
Dollars in millions    Amount      % of Total Loans
Using FICO
Credit Metric
     Amount      % of Total Loans
Using FICO
Credit Metric
 

June 30, 2013

               

FICO score greater than 719

   $ 2,178         53    $ 7,709         63

650 to 719

     1,153         28         3,225         25   

620 to 649

     180         4         467         4   

Less than 620

     240         6         554         5   

No FICO score available or required (c)

     384         9         351         3   

Total loans using FICO credit metric

     4,135         100      12,306         100

Consumer loans using other internal credit metrics (b)

                       8,871            

Total loan balance

   $ 4,135                $ 21,177            

Weighted-average updated FICO score (d)

              727                  741   

December 31, 2012

               

FICO score greater than 719

   $ 2,247         52    $ 7,006         60

650 to 719

     1,169         27         2,896         25   

620 to 649

     188         5         459         4   

Less than 620

     271         6         602         5   

No FICO score available or required (c)

     428         10         741         6   

Total loans using FICO credit metric

     4,303         100      11,704         100

Consumer loans using other internal credit metrics (b)

                       9,747            

Total loan balance

   $ 4,303                $ 21,451            

Weighted-average updated FICO score (d)

              726                  739   
(a) At June 30, 2013, we had $33 million of credit card loans that are higher risk (i.e., loans with both updated FICO scores less than 660 and in late stage (90+ days) delinquency status). The majority of the June 30, 2013 balance related to higher risk credit card loans is geographically distributed throughout the following areas: Ohio 19%, Pennsylvania 15%, Michigan 12%, Illinois 7%, Indiana 6%, Florida 5%, New Jersey 5% and Kentucky 5%. All other states have less than 4% individually and make up the remainder of the balance. At December 31, 2012, we had $36 million of credit card loans that are higher risk. The majority of the December 31, 2012 balance related to higher risk credit card loans is geographically distributed throughout the following areas: Ohio 18%, Pennsylvania 14%, Michigan 12%, Illinois 8%, Indiana 6%, Florida 6%, New Jersey 5%, Kentucky 4% and North Carolina 4%. All other states have less than 3% individually and make up the remainder of the balance.
(b) Other consumer loans for which updated FICO scores are used as an asset quality indicator include non-government guaranteed or insured education loans, automobile loans and other secured and unsecured lines and loans. Other consumer loans for which other internal credit metrics are used as an asset quality indicator include primarily government guaranteed or insured education loans, as well as consumer loans to high net worth individuals. Other internal credit metrics may include delinquency status, geography or other factors.
(c) Credit card loans and other consumer loans with no FICO score available or required refers to new accounts issued to borrowers with limited credit history, accounts for which we cannot obtain an updated FICO (e.g., recent profile changes), cards issued with a business name, and/or cards secured by collateral. Management proactively assesses the risk and size of this loan portfolio and, when necessary, takes actions to mitigate the credit risk.
(d) Weighted-average updated FICO score excludes accounts with no FICO score available or required.

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    101


Table of Contents

TROUBLED DEBT RESTRUCTURINGS (TDRS)

A TDR is a loan whose terms have been restructured in a manner that grants a concession to a borrower experiencing financial difficulties. TDRs result from borrowers that have been discharged from personal liability through Chapter 7 bankruptcy and have not formally reaffirmed their loan obligations to PNC. Additionally, TDRs result from our loss mitigation activities, and include rate reductions, principal forgiveness, postponement/reduction of scheduled amortization, and extensions, which are intended to minimize economic loss and to avoid foreclosure or repossession of collateral. In those situations where principal is forgiven, the amount of such principal forgiveness is immediately charged off.

Some TDRs may not ultimately result in the full collection of principal and interest, as restructured, and result in potential incremental losses. These potential incremental losses have been factored into our overall ALLL estimate. The level of any subsequent defaults will likely be affected by future economic conditions. Once a loan becomes a TDR, it will continue to be reported as a TDR until it is ultimately repaid in full, the collateral is foreclosed upon, or it is fully charged off. We held specific reserves in the ALLL of $.5 billion and $.6 billion at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, for the total TDR portfolio.

Table 72: Summary of Troubled Debt Restructurings

 

In millions    June 30
2013
     Dec. 31
2012
 

Total consumer lending

   $ 2,243       $ 2,318   

Total commercial lending

     599         541   

Total TDRs

   $ 2,842       $ 2,859   

Nonperforming

   $ 1,531       $ 1,589   

Accruing (a)

     1,103         1,037   

Credit card (b)

     208         233   

Total TDRs

   $ 2,842       $ 2,859   
(a) Accruing loans have demonstrated a period of at least six months of performance under the restructured terms and are excluded from nonperforming loans. Loans where borrowers have been discharged from personal liability through Chapter 7 bankruptcy and have not formally reaffirmed their loan obligation to PNC are not returned to accrual status.
(b) Includes credit cards and certain small business and consumer credit agreements whose terms have been restructured and are TDRs. However, since our policy is to exempt these loans from being placed on nonaccrual status as permitted by regulatory guidance as generally these loans are directly charged off in the period that they become 180 days past due, these loans are excluded from nonperforming loans.

Table 73: Financial Impact and TDRs by Concession Type quantifies the number of loans that were classified as TDRs as well as the change in the recorded investments as a result of the TDR classification during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. Additionally, the table provides information about the types of TDR concessions. The Principal Forgiveness TDR category includes principal forgiveness and accrued interest forgiveness. These types of TDRs result in a write down of the recorded investment and a charge-off if such action has not already taken place. The Rate Reduction TDR category includes reduced interest rate and interest deferral. The TDRs within this category would result in reductions to future interest income. The Other TDR category primarily includes consumer borrowers that have been discharged from personal liability through Chapter 7 bankruptcy and have not formally reaffirmed their loan obligation to PNC, as well as postponement/reduction of scheduled amortization and contractual extensions for both consumer and commercial borrowers.

In some cases, there have been multiple concessions granted on one loan. This is most common within the commercial loan portfolio. When there have been multiple concessions granted in the commercial loan portfolio, the principal forgiveness TDR was prioritized for purposes of determining the inclusion in the table below. For example, if there is principal forgiveness in conjunction with lower interest rate and postponement of amortization, the type of concession will be reported as Principal Forgiveness. Second in priority would be rate reduction. For example, if there is an interest rate reduction in conjunction with postponement of amortization, the type of concession will be reported as a Rate Reduction. In the event that multiple concessions are granted on a consumer loan, concessions resulting from discharge from personal liability through Chapter 7 bankruptcy without formal affirmation of the loan obligation to PNC would be prioritized and included in the Other type of concession in the table below. After that, consumer loan concessions would follow the previously discussed priority of concessions for the commercial loan portfolio.

 

 

102    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

Table 73: Financial Impact and TDRs by Concession Type (a)

 

    

Number
of Loans

    

Pre-TDR

Recorded
Investment (b)

     Post-TDR Recorded Investment (c)  

During the three months ended June 30, 2013

Dollars in millions

         Principal
Forgiveness
     Rate
Reduction
     Other      Total  

Commercial lending

                                                     

Commercial

     47       $ 48       $ 4       $ 2       $ 28       $ 34   

Commercial real estate

     30         50         6         2         27         35   

Equipment lease financing

     5         23                  11         1         12   

Total commercial lending

     82         121         10         15         56         81   

Consumer lending

                         

Home equity

     1,410         98            43         39         82   

Residential real estate

     285         32            7         25         32   

Credit card

     2,288         18            17              17   

Other consumer

     783         9                  1         6         7   

Total consumer lending

     4,766         157                  68         70         138   

Total TDRs

     4,848       $ 278       $ 10       $ 83       $ 126       $ 219   
       

During the three months ended June 30, 2012

Dollars in millions

                                               

Commercial lending

                         

Commercial

     33       $ 102       $ 1       $ 40       $ 42       $ 83   

Commercial real estate

     13         26         8         5         9         22   

Equipment lease financing

     1         3         1                           1   

Total commercial lending

     47         131         10         45         51         106   

Consumer lending

                         

Home equity

     1,083         69            60         8         68   

Residential real estate

     200         41            18         20         38   

Credit card

     2,268         17            16              16   

Other consumer

     61         1                           1         1   

Total consumer lending

     3,612         128                  94         29         123   

Total TDRs

     3,659       $ 259       $ 10       $ 139       $ 80       $ 229   

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    103


Table of Contents

During the six months ended June 30, 2013

Dollars in millions

  

Number
of Loans

    

Pre-TDR

Recorded
Investment (b)

     Post-TDR Recorded Investment (c)  
         Principal
Forgiveness
     Rate
Reduction
     Other      Total  

Commercial lending

                                                     

Commercial

     78       $ 86       $ 4       $ 4       $ 50       $ 58   

Commercial real estate

     65         183         12         42         102         156   

Equipment lease financing

     7         29                  11         2         13   

Total commercial lending

     150         298         16         57         154         227   

Consumer lending

                   

Home equity

     3,715         217            82         88         170   

Residential real estate

     609         78            19         58         77   

Credit card

     4,663         35            33            33   

Other consumer

     1,425         19                  1         15         16   

Total consumer lending

     10,412         349                  135         161         296   

Total TDRs

     10,562       $ 647       $ 16       $ 192       $ 315       $ 523   
     

During the six months ended June 30, 2012

Dollars in millions

                                               

Commercial lending

                   

Commercial

     137       $ 128       $ 3       $ 44       $ 53       $ 100   

Commercial real estate

     34         100         17         43         29         89   

Equipment lease financing

     6         18         1                  11         12   

Total commercial lending

     177         246         21         87         93         201   

Consumer lending

                   

Home equity

     2,186         143            112         30         142   

Residential real estate

     382         74            29         42         71   

Credit card

     4,651         35            33            33   

Other consumer

     413         10                  1         9         10   

Total consumer lending

     7,632         262                  175         81         256   

Total TDRs

     7,809       $ 508       $ 21       $ 262       $ 174       $ 457   
(a) Impact of partial charge-offs at TDR date are included in this table.
(b) Represents the recorded investment of the loans as of the quarter end prior to TDR designation, and excludes immaterial amounts of accrued interest receivable.
(c) Represents the recorded investment of the TDRs as of the quarter end the TDR occurs, and excludes immaterial amounts of accrued interest receivable.

TDRs may result in charge-offs and interest income not being recognized. At or around the time of modification, the amount of principal balance of the TDRs charged off during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 was not material. A financial effect of rate reduction TDRs is that interest income is not recognized. Interest income not recognized that otherwise would have been earned in the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, related to both commercial TDRs and consumer TDRs was not material.

After a loan is determined to be a TDR, we continue to track its performance under its most recent restructured terms. In Table 74: TDRs which have Subsequently Defaulted, we consider a TDR to have subsequently defaulted when it becomes 60 days past due after the most recent date the loan was restructured. The following table presents the recorded investment of loans that were classified as TDRs or were subsequently modified during each 12-month period prior to the reporting periods preceding April 1, 2013, January 1, 2013, April 1, 2012 and January 1, 2012, respectively, and subsequently defaulted during these reporting periods.

 

104    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

Table 74: TDRs which have Subsequently Defaulted

 

During the three months ended June 30, 2013

Dollars in millions

   Number of Contracts      Recorded Investment  

Commercial lending

       

Commercial

     11       $ 8   

Commercial real estate

     12         21   

Total commercial lending (a)

     23         29   

Consumer lending

       

Home equity

     402         26   

Residential real estate

     251         35   

Credit card

     1,225         9   

Other consumer

     55         1   

Total consumer lending

     1,933         71   

Total TDRs

     1,956       $ 100   
 

During the three months ended June 30, 2012

Dollars in millions

   Number of Contracts      Recorded Investment  

Commercial lending

       

Commercial

     27       $ 5   

Commercial real estate

     15         35   

Equipment lease financing

     5         11   

Total commercial lending

     47         51   

Consumer lending

       

Home equity

     161         14   

Residential real estate

     144         23   

Credit card

     2,114         15   

Other consumer

     39         1   

Total consumer lending

     2,458         53   

Total TDRs

     2,505       $ 104   

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    105


Table of Contents

During the six months ended June 30, 2013

Dollars in millions

   Number of Contracts      Recorded Investment  

Commercial lending

       

Commercial

     26       $ 18   

Commercial real estate

     18         31   

Total commercial lending (a)

     44         49   

Consumer lending

       

Home equity

     565         37   

Residential real estate

     353         49   

Credit card

     2,373         18   

Other consumer

     88         2   

Total consumer lending

     3,379         106   

Total TDRs

     3,423       $ 155   
 

During the six months ended June 30, 2012

Dollars in millions

   Number of Contracts      Recorded Investment  

Commercial lending

       

Commercial

     58       $ 15   

Commercial real estate

     23         40   

Equipment lease financing

     5         11   

Total commercial lending

     86         66   

Consumer lending

       

Home equity

     366         33   

Residential real estate

     307         46   

Credit card

     2,815         20   

Other consumer

     76         3   

Total consumer lending

     3,564         102   

Total TDRs

     3,650       $ 168   
(a) During the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, there were no loans classified as TDRs in the Equipment lease financing loan class that have subsequently defaulted.

 

The impact to the ALLL for commercial lending TDRs is the effect of moving to the specific reserve methodology from the quantitative reserve methodology for those loans that were not already put on nonaccrual status. There is an impact to the ALLL as a result of the concession made, which generally results in the expectation of fewer future cash flows. The decline in expected cash flows, consideration of collateral value, and/or the application of a present value discount rate, when compared to the recorded investment, results in a charge-off or increased ALLL. As TDRs are individually evaluated under the specific reserve methodology, which builds in expectations of future performance, subsequent defaults do not generally have a significant additional impact to the ALLL.

For consumer lending TDRs, except TDRs resulting from borrowers that have been discharged from personal liability through Chapter 7 bankruptcy and have not formally reaffirmed their loan obligations to PNC, the ALLL is calculated using a discounted cash flow model, which leverages subsequent default, prepayment, and severity rate assumptions based upon historically observed data. Similar to the commercial lending specific reserve methodology, the reduced expected cash flows resulting from the concessions granted impact the consumer lending ALLL. The decline in

expected cash flows due to the application of a present value discount rate or the consideration of collateral value, when compared to the recorded investment, results in increased ALLL or a charge-off. See Note 1 Accounting Policies for information on how the ALLL is determined for loans where borrowers have been discharged from personal liability through Chapter 7 bankruptcy and have not formally reaffirmed their loan obligation to PNC.

IMPAIRED LOANS

Impaired loans include commercial nonperforming loans and consumer and commercial TDRs, regardless of nonperforming status. Excluded from impaired loans are nonperforming leases, loans held for sale, loans accounted for under the fair value option, smaller balance homogeneous type loans and purchased impaired loans. See Note 6 Purchased Loans for additional information. Nonperforming equipment lease financing loans of $7 million and $12 million at June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, respectively, are excluded from impaired loans pursuant to authoritative lease accounting guidance. We did not recognize any interest income on impaired loans that have not returned to performing status, while they were impaired during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012. The following table provides further detail on impaired loans individually

 

 

106    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

evaluated for impairment and the associated ALLL. Certain commercial impaired loans do not have a related ALLL as the

valuation of these impaired loans exceeded the recorded investment.

 

 

Table 75: Impaired Loans

 

In millions    Unpaid
Principal
Balance
     Recorded
Investment (a)
     Associated
Allowance (b)
     Average
Recorded
Investment (a)
 

June 30, 2013

             

Impaired loans with an associated allowance

             

Commercial

   $ 636       $ 444       $ 117       $ 475   

Commercial real estate

     702         481         111         548   

Home equity

     1,033         1,012         354         1,014   

Residential real estate

     589         479         86         589   

Credit card

     209         208         39         202   

Other consumer

     64         53         3         73   

Total impaired loans with an associated allowance

   $ 3,233       $ 2,677       $ 710       $ 2,901   

Impaired loans without an associated allowance

             

Commercial

   $ 376       $ 155          $ 141   

Commercial real estate

     531         359            363   

Home equity

     292         118            107   

Residential real estate

     395         373                  279   

Total impaired loans without an associated allowance

   $ 1,594       $ 1,005                $ 890   

Total impaired loans

   $ 4,827       $ 3,682       $ 710       $ 3,791   

December 31, 2012

             

Impaired loans with an associated allowance

             

Commercial

   $ 824       $ 523       $ 150       $ 653   

Commercial real estate

     851         594         143         778   

Home equity

     1,070         1,013         328         851   

Residential real estate

     778         663         168         700   

Credit card

     204         204         48         227   

Other consumer

     104         86         3         63   

Total impaired loans with an associated allowance

   $ 3,831       $ 3,083       $ 840       $ 3,272   

Impaired loans without an associated allowance

             

Commercial

   $ 362       $ 126          $ 157   

Commercial real estate

     562         355            400   

Home equity

     169         121            40   

Residential real estate

     316         231                  77   

Total impaired loans without an associated allowance

   $ 1,409       $ 833                $ 674   

Total impaired loans

   $ 5,240       $ 3,916       $ 840       $ 3,946   
(a) Recorded investment in a loan includes the unpaid principal balance plus accrued interest and net accounting adjustments, less any charge-offs. Recorded investment does not include any associated valuation allowance. Average recorded investment is for the six months ended June 30, 2013, and the year ended December 31, 2012, respectively.
(b) Associated allowance amounts include $.5 billion and $.6 billion for TDRs at June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, respectively.

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    107


Table of Contents

NOTE 6 PURCHASED LOANS

PURCHASED IMPAIRED LOANS

Purchased impaired loan accounting addresses differences between contractual cash flows and cash flows expected to be collected from the initial investment in loans if those differences are attributable, at least in part, to credit quality. Several factors were considered when evaluating whether a loan was considered a purchased impaired loan, including the delinquency status of the loan, updated borrower credit status, geographic information, and updated loan-to-values (LTV). GAAP allows purchasers to aggregate purchased impaired loans acquired in the same fiscal quarter into one or more pools, provided that the loans have common risk characteristics. A pool is then accounted for as a single asset with a single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows. Purchased impaired homogeneous consumer, residential real estate and smaller balance commercial loans with common risk characteristics are aggregated into pools where appropriate. Commercial loans with a total commitment greater than a defined threshold are accounted for individually. The excess of undiscounted cash flows expected at acquisition over the estimated fair value is referred to as the accretable yield and is recognized as interest income over the remaining life of the loan using the constant effective yield method. The difference between contractually required payments at acquisition and the cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition is referred to as the nonaccretable difference. Subsequent changes in the expected cash flows of individual or pooled purchased impaired loans from the date of acquisition will either impact the accretable yield or result in an impairment charge to provision for credit losses in the period in which the changes become probable. Decreases to the net present value of expected cash flows will generally result in an impairment charge recorded as a provision for credit losses, resulting in an increase to the allowance for loan and lease losses, and a reclassification from accretable yield to nonaccretable difference. Prepayments and interest rate decreases for variable rate notes are treated as a reduction of expected and contractual cash flows such that the nonaccretable difference is not affected. Thus, for decreases in cash flows expected to be collected resulting from prepayments and interest rate decreases for variable rate notes, the effect will be to reduce the yield prospectively.

The following table provides purchased impaired loans at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

Table 76: Purchased Impaired Loans – Balances

 

    June 30, 2013     December 31, 2012  
In millions   Recorded
Investment
   

Outstanding

Balance

    Recorded
Investment
   

Outstanding

Balance

 

Commercial lending

         

Commercial

  $ 231      $ 391      $ 308      $ 524   

Commercial real estate

    737        908        941        1,156   

Total commercial lending

    968        1,299        1,249        1,680   

Consumer lending

         

Consumer

    2,474        2,754        2,621        2,988   

Residential real estate

    3,336        3,341        3,536        3,651   

Total consumer lending

    5,810        6,095        6,157        6,639   

Total

  $ 6,778      $ 7,394      $ 7,406      $ 8,319   

During the first six months of 2013, $90 million of provision and $70 million of charge-offs were recorded on purchased impaired loans. At June 30, 2013, the allowance for loan and lease losses was $1.1 billion on $6.2 billion of purchased impaired loans while the remaining $.6 billion of purchased impaired loans required no allowance as the net present value of expected cash flows equaled or exceeded the recorded investment. As of December 31, 2012, the allowance for loan and lease losses related to purchased impaired loans was $1.1 billion. If any allowance for loan losses is recognized on a purchased impaired pool, which is accounted for as a single asset, the entire balance of that pool would be disclosed as requiring an allowance. Subsequent increases in the net present value of cash flows will result in a recovery of any previously recorded allowance for loan and lease losses, to the extent applicable, and/or a reclassification from non-accretable difference to accretable yield, which will be recognized prospectively. Disposals of loans, which may include sales of loans or foreclosures, result in removal of the loan for cash flow estimation purposes. The cash flow re-estimation process is completed quarterly to evaluate the appropriateness of the allowance associated with the purchased impaired loans.

Activity for the accretable yield for the first six months of 2013 follows:

Table 77: Purchased Impaired Loans – Accretable Yield

 

In millions   2013  

January 1

  $ 2,166   

Accretion (including excess cash recoveries)

    (368

Net reclassifications to accretable from non-accretable (a)

    379   

Disposals

    (13

June 30

  $ 2,164   
(a) Approximately 58% of the net reclassifications were driven by the consumer portfolio and were due to improvements of cash expected to be collected on both RBC Bank (USA) and National City loans in future periods. The remaining net reclassifications were predominantly due to future cash flow changes in the commercial portfolio.
 

 

108    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

NOTE 7 ALLOWANCES FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES AND UNFUNDED LOAN COMMITMENTS AND LETTERS OF CREDIT

We maintain the ALLL and the Allowance for Unfunded Loan Commitments and Letters of Credit at levels that we believe to be appropriate to absorb estimated probable credit losses incurred in the portfolios as of the balance sheet date. We use the two main portfolio segments – Commercial Lending and Consumer Lending – and we develop and document the ALLL under separate methodologies for each of these segments as further discussed and presented below.

ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES COMPONENTS

For all loans, except purchased impaired loans, the ALLL is the sum of three components: (i) asset specific/individual impaired reserves, (ii) quantitative (formulaic or pooled) reserves and (iii) qualitative (judgmental) reserves. See Note 6 Purchased Loans for additional ALLL information. The reserve calculation and determination process is dependent on the use of key assumptions. Key reserve assumptions and estimation processes react to and are influenced by observed changes in loan portfolio performance experience, the financial strength of the borrower, and economic conditions. Key reserve assumptions are periodically updated.

ASSET SPECIFIC/INDIVIDUAL COMPONENT

Commercial nonperforming loans and all TDRs are considered impaired and are evaluated for a specific reserve. See Note 1 Accounting Policies for additional information.

COMMERCIAL LENDING QUANTITATIVE COMPONENT

The estimates of the quantitative component of ALLL for incurred losses within the commercial lending portfolio segment are determined through statistical loss modeling utilizing PD, LGD and outstanding balance of the loan. Based upon loan risk ratings, we assign PDs and LGDs. Each of these statistical parameters is determined based on internal historical data and market data. PD is influenced by such factors as liquidity, industry, obligor financial structure, access to capital and cash flow. LGD is influenced by collateral type, original and/or updated LTV and guarantees by related parties.

CONSUMER LENDING QUANTITATIVE COMPONENT

Quantitative estimates within the consumer lending portfolio segment are calculated using a roll-rate model based on statistical relationships, calculated from historical data that estimate the movement of loan outstandings through the various stages of delinquency and ultimately charge-off.

QUALITATIVE COMPONENT

While our reserve methodologies strive to reflect all relevant risk factors, there continues to be uncertainty associated with, but not limited to, potential imprecision in the estimation process due to the inherent time lag of obtaining information and normal variations between estimates and actual outcomes. We provide additional reserves that are designed to provide coverage for losses attributable to such risks. The ALLL also includes factors that may not be directly measured in the determination of specific or pooled reserves. Such qualitative factors may include:

   

Industry concentrations and conditions,

   

Recent credit quality trends,

   

Recent loss experience in particular portfolios,

   

Recent macro-economic factors,

   

Model imprecision,

   

Changes in lending policies and procedures,

   

Timing of available information, including the performance of first lien positions, and

   

Limitations of available historical data.

ALLOWANCE FOR RBC BANK (USA) PURCHASED NON-IMPAIRED LOANS

ALLL for RBC Bank (USA) purchased non-impaired loans is determined based upon the methodologies described above compared to the remaining acquisition date fair value discount that has yet to be accreted into interest income. After making the comparison, an ALLL is recorded for the amount greater than the discount, or no ALLL is recorded if the discount is greater.

ALLOWANCE FOR PURCHASED IMPAIRED LOANS

ALLL for purchased impaired loans is determined in accordance with ASC 310-30 by comparing the net present value of the cash flows expected to be collected to the Recorded Investment for a given loan (or pool of loans). In cases where the net present value of expected cash flows is lower than Recorded Investment, ALLL is established. Cash flows expected to be collected represent management’s best estimate of the cash flows expected over the life of a loan (or pool of loans). For large balance commercial loans, cash flows are separately estimated and compared to the Recorded Investment at the loan level. For smaller balance pooled loans, cash flows are estimated using cash flow models and compared at the risk pool level, which was defined at acquisition based on the risk characteristics of the loan. Our cash flow models use loan data including, but not limited to, delinquency status of the loan, updated borrower FICO credit scores, geographic information, historical loss experience, and updated LTVs, as well as best estimates for unemployment rates, home prices and other economic factors, to determine estimated cash flows.

 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    109


Table of Contents

Table 78: Rollforward of Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses and Associated Loan Data

 

In millions    Commercial
Lending
     Consumer
Lending
     Total  

June 30, 2013

          

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

          

January 1

   $ 1,774       $ 2,262       $ 4,036   

Charge-offs

     (336      (589      (925

Recoveries

     185         76         261   

Net charge-offs

     (151      (513      (664

Provision for credit losses

     28         365         393   

Net change in allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit

     8            8   

Other

     (1               (1

June 30

   $ 1,658       $ 2,114       $ 3,772   

TDRs individually evaluated for impairment

   $ 25       $ 482       $ 507   

Other loans individually evaluated for impairment

     203            203   

Loans collectively evaluated for impairment

     1,247         698         1,945   

Purchased impaired loans

     183         934         1,117   

June 30

   $ 1,658       $ 2,114       $ 3,772   

Loan Portfolio

          

TDRs individually evaluated for impairment

   $ 599       $ 2,243       $ 2,842   

Other loans individually evaluated for impairment

     840            840   

Loans collectively evaluated for impairment (a)

     110,863         68,452         179,315   

Purchased impaired loans

     968         5,810         6,778   

June 30

   $ 113,270       $ 76,505       $ 189,775   

Portfolio Segment ALLL as a percentage of total ALLL

     44      56      100

Ratio of the allowance for loan and lease losses to total loans

     1.46      2.76      1.99

June 30, 2012

          

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

          

January 1

   $ 1,995       $ 2,352       $ 4,347   

Charge-offs

     (403      (526      (929

Recoveries

     214         67         281   

Net charge-offs

     (189      (459      (648

Provision for credit losses

     88         353         441   

Net change in allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit

     7         9         16   

June 30

   $ 1,901       $ 2,255       $ 4,156   

TDRs individually evaluated for impairment

   $ 45       $ 527       $ 572   

Other loans individually evaluated for impairment

     419            419   

Loans collectively evaluated for impairment

     1,210         920         2,130   

Purchased impaired loans

     227         808         1,035   

June 30

   $ 1,901       $ 2,255       $ 4,156   

Loan Portfolio

          

TDRs individually evaluated for impairment

   $ 483       $ 1,836       $ 2,319   

Other loans individually evaluated for impairment

     1,523            1,523   

Loans collectively evaluated for impairment

     100,607         67,893         168,500   

Purchased impaired loans

     1,532         6,551         8,083   

June 30

   $ 104,145       $ 76,280       $ 180,425   

Portfolio segment ALLL as a percentage of total ALLL

     46      54      100

Ratio of the allowance for loan and lease losses to total loans

     1.83      2.96      2.30
(a) Includes $291 million of loans collectively evaluated for impairment based upon collateral values and written down to the respective collateral value less costs to sell. Accordingly, there is no allowance recorded for these loans.

 

110    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

ALLOWANCE FOR UNFUNDED LOAN COMMITMENTS AND LETTERS OF CREDIT

We maintain the allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit at a level we believe is appropriate to absorb estimated probable credit losses on these unfunded credit facilities as of the balance sheet date. See Note 1 Accounting Policies for additional information.

Table 79: Rollforward of Allowance for Unfunded Loan Commitments and Letters of Credit

 

In millions    2013      2012  

January 1

   $ 250       $ 240   

Net change in allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit

     (8      (16

June 30

   $ 242       $ 224   
 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    111


Table of Contents

NOTE 8 INVESTMENT SECURITIES

Table 80: Investment Securities Summary

 

     Amortized      Unrealized      Fair  
In millions    Cost      Gains      Losses      Value  

June 30, 2013

             

Securities Available for Sale

             

Debt securities

             

U.S. Treasury and government agencies

   $ 2,052       $ 158          $ 2,210   

Residential mortgage-backed

             

Agency

     23,915         514       $ (181      24,248   

Non-agency

     5,816         292         (256      5,852   

Commercial mortgage-backed

             

Agency

     574         22         (1      595   

Non-agency

     3,560         135         (16      3,679   

Asset-backed

     6,036         57         (59      6,034   

State and municipal

     2,193         64         (40      2,217   

Other debt

     2,733         60         (26      2,767   

Total debt securities

     46,879         1,302         (579      47,602   

Corporate stocks and other

     297                           297   

Total securities available for sale

   $ 47,176       $ 1,302       $ (579    $ 47,899   

Securities Held to Maturity

             

Debt securities

             

U.S. Treasury and government agencies

   $ 234       $ 21          $ 255   

Residential mortgage-backed (agency)

     3,773         84       $ (32      3,825   

Commercial mortgage-backed

             

Agency

     1,262         57            1,319   

Non-agency

     2,193         42         (4      2,231   

Asset-backed

     1,100         3         (3      1,100   

State and municipal

     639         19            658   

Other debt

     349         12                  361   

Total securities held to maturity

   $ 9,550       $ 238       $ (39    $ 9,749   

December 31, 2012

             

Securities Available for Sale

             

Debt securities

             

U.S. Treasury and government agencies

   $ 2,868       $ 245          $ 3,113   

Residential mortgage-backed

             

Agency

     25,844         952       $ (12      26,784   

Non-agency

     6,102         314         (309      6,107   

Commercial mortgage-backed

             

Agency

     602         31            633   

Non-agency

     3,055         210         (1      3,264   

Asset-backed

     5,667         65         (79      5,653   

State and municipal

     2,197         111         (21      2,287   

Other debt

     2,745         103         (4      2,844   

Total debt securities

     49,080         2,031         (426      50,685   

Corporate stocks and other

     367                           367   

Total securities available for sale

   $ 49,447       $ 2,031       $ (426    $ 51,052   

Securities Held to Maturity

             

Debt securities

             

U.S. Treasury and government agencies

   $ 230       $ 47          $ 277   

Residential mortgage-backed (agency)

     4,380         202            4,582   

Commercial mortgage-backed

             

Agency

     1,287         87            1,374   

Non-agency

     2,582         85            2,667   

Asset-backed

     858         5            863   

State and municipal

     664         61            725   

Other debt

     353         19                  372   

Total securities held to maturity

   $ 10,354       $ 506                $ 10,860   

 

112    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

The fair value of investment securities is impacted by interest rates, credit spreads, market volatility and liquidity conditions. Net unrealized gains and losses in the securities available for sale portfolio are included in shareholders’ equity as accumulated other comprehensive income or loss, net of tax, unless credit-related. Securities held to maturity are carried at amortized cost. At June 30, 2013, accumulated other comprehensive income included pretax gains of $73 million from derivatives that hedged the purchase of investment securities classified as held to maturity. The gains will be accreted into interest income as an adjustment of yield on the securities.

The gross unrealized loss on debt securities held to maturity was $39 million at June 30, 2013 and less than $1 million at December 31, 2012, with $1.6 billion and $73 million of positions in a continuous loss position for less than 12 months at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The fair value of debt securities held to maturity that were in a continuous loss position for 12 months or more was $35 million and $56 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Table 81: Gross Unrealized Loss and Fair Value of Securities Available for Sale presents gross unrealized loss and fair value of securities available for sale at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. The securities are segregated between investments that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than twelve months and twelve months or more based on the point in time the fair value declined below the amortized cost basis. The table includes debt securities where a portion of other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) has been recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).

Table 81: Gross Unrealized Loss and Fair Value of Securities Available for Sale

 

In millions   

Unrealized loss position

less than 12 months

    

Unrealized loss position

12 months or more

     Total  
      Unrealized
Loss
   

Fair

Value

     Unrealized
Loss
     Fair
Value
     Unrealized
Loss
    

Fair

Value

 

June 30, 2013

                  

Debt securities

                  

Residential mortgage-backed

                  

Agency

   $ (176   $ 8,046       $ (5    $ 163       $ (181    $ 8,209   

Non-agency

     (53     1,563         (203      1,877         (256      3,440   

Commercial mortgage-backed

                  

Agency

     (1     32               (1      32   

Non-agency

     (16     1,039               (16      1,039   

Asset-backed

     (8     1,055         (51      228         (59      1,283   

State and municipal

     (22     818         (18      274         (40      1,092   

Other debt

     (25     867         (1      16         (26      883   

Total

   $ (301   $ 13,420       $ (278    $ 2,558       $ (579    $ 15,978   

December 31, 2012

                  

Debt securities

                  

Residential mortgage-backed

                  

Agency

   $ (9   $ 1,128       $ (3    $ 121       $ (12    $ 1,249   

Non-agency

     (3     219         (306      3,185         (309      3,404   

Commercial mortgage-backed

                  

Non-agency

     (1     60               (1      60   

Asset-backed

     (1     370         (78      625         (79      995   

State and municipal

     (2     240         (19      518         (21      758   

Other debt

     (2     61         (2      15         (4      76   

Total

   $ (18   $ 2,078       $ (408    $ 4,464       $ (426    $ 6,542   

EVALUATING INVESTMENT SECURITIES FOR OTHER-THAN-TEMPORARY IMPAIRMENTS

For the securities in the preceding table, as of June 30, 2013 we do not intend to sell and believe we will not be required to sell the securities prior to recovery of the amortized cost basis.

On at least a quarterly basis, we conduct a comprehensive security-level assessment on all securities. For those securities in an unrealized loss position we determine if OTTI exists. An unrealized loss exists when the current fair value of an individual security is less than its amortized cost basis. An OTTI loss must be recognized for a debt security in an unrealized loss position if we intend

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    113


Table of Contents

to sell the security or it is more likely than not we will be required to sell the security prior to recovery of its amortized cost basis. In this situation, the amount of loss recognized in income is equal to the difference between the fair value and the amortized cost basis of the security. Even if we do not expect to sell the security, we must evaluate the expected cash flows to be received to determine if we believe a credit loss has occurred. In the event of a credit loss, only the amount of impairment associated with the credit loss is recognized in income. The portion of the unrealized loss relating to other factors, such as liquidity conditions in the market or changes in market interest rates, is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).

The security-level assessment is performed on each security, regardless of the classification of the security as available for sale or held to maturity. Our assessment considers the security structure, recent security collateral performance metrics if applicable, external credit ratings, failure of the issuer to make scheduled interest or principal payments, our judgment and expectations of future performance, and relevant independent industry research, analysis and forecasts. Results of the periodic assessment are reviewed by a cross-functional senior management team representing Asset & Liability Management, Finance, and Market Risk Management. The senior management team considers the results of the assessments, as well as other factors, in determining whether the impairment is other-than-temporary.

For debt securities, a critical component of the evaluation for OTTI is the identification of credit-impaired securities, where management does not expect to receive cash flows sufficient to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security. The paragraphs below describe our process for identifying credit impairment for our most significant categories of securities not backed by the U.S. government or its agencies.

NON-AGENCY RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES AND ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES COLLATERALIZED BY FIRST-LIEN AND SECOND-LIEN NON-AGENCY RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE LOANS

Potential credit losses on these securities are evaluated on a security-by-security basis. Collateral performance assumptions are developed for each security after reviewing collateral composition and collateral performance statistics. This includes analyzing recent delinquency roll rates, loss severities, voluntary prepayments, and various other collateral and performance metrics. This information is then combined with general expectations on the housing market, employment, and other economic factors to develop estimates of future performance.

Security level assumptions for prepayments, loan defaults, and loss given default are applied to every security using a third-party cash flow model. The third-party cash flow model then generates projected cash flows according to the structure of each security. Based on the results of the cash flow analysis, we determine whether we expect that we will recover the amortized cost basis of our security.

The following table provides detail on the significant assumptions used to determine credit impairment for non-agency residential mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities collateralized by first-lien and second-lien non-agency residential mortgage loans.

Table 82: Credit Impairment Assessment Assumptions – Non-Agency Residential Mortgage-Backed and Asset-Backed Securities (a)

 

June 30, 2013    Range      Weighted-
average (b)
 

Long-term prepayment rate (annual CPR)

       

Prime

     7-20      14

Alt-A

     5-12         6   

Option ARM

     3-6         3   

Remaining collateral expected to default

       

Prime

     1-45      18

Alt-A

     7-57         33   

Option ARM

     16-69         48   

Loss severity

       

Prime

     25-71      43

Alt-A

     30-85         56   

Option ARM

     40-70         59   
(a) Collateralized by first and second-lien non-agency residential mortgage loans.
(b) Calculated by weighting the relevant assumption for each individual security by the current outstanding cost basis of the security.

NON-AGENCY COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES

Credit losses on these securities are measured using property-level cash flow projections and forward-looking property valuations. Cash flows are projected using a detailed analysis of net operating income (NOI) by property type which, in turn, is based on the analysis of NOI performance over the past several business cycles combined with PNC’s economic outlook for the current cycle. Loss severities are based on property price projections, which are calculated using capitalization rate projections. The capitalization rate projections are based on a combination of historical capitalization rates and expected capitalization rates implied by current market activity, our outlook and relevant independent industry research, analysis and forecasts. Securities exhibiting weaker performance within the model are subject to further analysis. This analysis is performed at the loan level, and includes assessing local market conditions, reserves, occupancy, rent rolls and master/special servicer details.

 

 

114    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

During the second quarter and first six months of 2013 and 2012, respectively, the OTTI credit losses recognized in noninterest income and the OTTI noncredit losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, on securities that we do not expect to sell were as follows:

Table 83: Other-Than-Temporary Impairments

 

      Three months ended June 30      Six months ended June 30  
In millions    2013     2012      2013      2012  

Credit portion of OTTI losses

              

Available for sale securities:

              

Non-agency residential mortgage-backed

   $ (3   $ (31    $ (10    $ (63

Asset-backed

     (1     (3      (4      (8

Other debt

                               (1

Total credit portion of OTTI losses

     (4     (34      (14      (72

Noncredit portion of OTTI (losses) recoveries

     (6     2         3         24   

Total OTTI losses

   $ (10   $ (32      (11      (48

The following table presents a rollforward of the cumulative OTTI credit losses recognized in earnings for all debt securities for which a portion of an OTTI loss was recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).

Table 84: Rollforward of Cumulative OTTI Credit Losses Recognized in Earnings

 

In millions    Non-agency
residential
mortgage-backed
    Non-agency
commercial
mortgage-backed
    Asset-backed     Other debt     Total  

For the three months ended June 30, 2013

            

March 31, 2013

   $ (887   $ (6   $ (258   $ (14   $ (1,165

Additional loss where credit impairment was previously recognized

     (3       (1       (4

Reduction due to credit impaired securities sold or matured

     5                                5   

June 30, 2013

   $ (885   $ (6   $ (259   $ (14   $ (1,164

 

In millions    Non-agency
residential
mortgage-backed
    Non-agency
commercial
mortgage-backed
    Asset-backed     Other debt     Total  

For the three months ended June 30, 2012

            

March 31, 2012

   $ (859   $ (6   $ (249   $ (14   $ (1,128

Loss where impairment was not previously recognized

     (1           (1

Additional loss where credit impairment was previously recognized

     (30             (3             (33

June 30, 2012

   $ (890   $ (6   $ (252   $ (14   $ (1,162

 

In millions    Non-agency
residential
mortgage-backed
    Non-agency
commercial
mortgage-backed
    Asset-backed     Other debt     Total  

For the six months ended June 30, 2013

            

December 31, 2012

   $ (926   $ (6   $ (255   $ (14   $ (1,201

Additional loss where credit impairment was previously recognized

     (10       (4       (14

Reduction due to credit impaired securities sold or matured

     51                                51   

June 30, 2013

   $ (885   $ (6   $ (259   $ (14   $ (1,164

 

In millions    Non-agency
residential
mortgage-backed
    Non-agency
commercial
mortgage-backed
    Asset-backed     Other debt     Total  

For the six months ended June 30, 2012

            

December 31, 2011

   $ (828   $ (6   $ (244   $ (13   $ (1,091

Loss where impairment was not previously recognized

     (2         (1     (3

Additional loss where credit impairment was previously recognized

     (61       (8       (69

Reduction due to credit impaired securities sold or matured

     1                                1   

June 30, 2012

   $ (890   $ (6   $ (252   $ (14   $ (1,162

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    115


Table of Contents

Information relating to gross realized securities gains and losses from the sales of securities is set forth in the following table.

Table 85: Gains (Losses) on Sales of Securities Available for Sale

 

In millions    Proceeds      Gross
Gains
     Gross
Losses
     Net
Gains
     Tax
Expense
 

For the six months ended June 30

                

2013

   $ 3,877       $ 98       $ (23    $ 75       $ 26   

2012

     6,607         129         (10      119         42   

The following table presents, by remaining contractual maturity, the amortized cost, fair value and weighted-average yield of debt securities at June 30, 2013.

Table 86: Contractual Maturity of Debt Securities

 

June 30, 2013

Dollars in millions

   1 Year or Less      After 1 Year
through 5 Years
     After 5 Years
through 10 Years
     After 10
Years
     Total  

Securities Available for Sale

                

U.S. Treasury and government agencies

   $ 1       $ 1,082       $ 804       $ 165       $ 2,052   

Residential mortgage-backed

                

Agency

     1         33         513         23,368         23,915   

Non-agency

        12         2         5,802         5,816   

Commercial mortgage-backed

                

Agency

     10         528         36            574   

Non-agency

     75         59         105         3,321         3,560   

Asset-backed

     5         1,088         2,138         2,805         6,036   

State and municipal

     12         116         389         1,676         2,193   

Other debt

     524         1,337         529         343         2,733   

Total debt securities available for sale

   $ 628       $ 4,255       $ 4,516       $ 37,480       $ 46,879   

Fair value

   $ 635       $ 4,356       $ 4,658       $ 37,953       $ 47,602   

Weighted-average yield, GAAP basis

     2.72      2.45      2.38      3.30      3.13

Securities Held to Maturity

                

U.S. Treasury and government agencies

            $ 234       $ 234   

Residential mortgage-backed (agency)

              3,773         3,773   

Commercial mortgage-backed

                

Agency

      $ 423       $ 834         5         1,262   

Non-agency

        51            2,142         2,193   

Asset-backed

        60         80         960         1,100   

State and municipal

        34         282         323         639   

Other debt

              1         348                  349   

Total debt securities held to maturity

            $ 569       $ 1,544       $ 7,437       $ 9,550   

Fair value

      $ 583       $ 1,607       $ 7,559       $ 9,749   

Weighted-average yield, GAAP basis

              3.32      3.42      3.82      3.72

 

116    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

Based on current interest rates and expected prepayment speeds, the weighted-average expected maturity of mortgage and other asset-backed debt securities were as follows as of June 30, 2013:

Table 87: Weighted-Average Expected Maturity of Mortgage and Other Asset-Backed Debt Securities

 

June 30, 2013    Years  

Agency residential mortgage-backed securities

     4.6   

Non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities

     5.9   

Agency commercial mortgage-backed securities

     4.2   

Non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities

     2.4   

Asset-backed securities

     3.8   

Weighted-average yields are based on historical cost with effective yields weighted for the contractual maturity of each security. At June 30, 2013, there were no securities of a single issuer, other than FNMA, that exceeded 10% of total shareholders’ equity.

The following table presents the fair value of securities that have been either pledged to or accepted from others to collateralize outstanding borrowings.

Table 88: Fair Value of Securities Pledged and Accepted as Collateral

 

In millions    June 30
2013
     December 31
2012
 

Pledged to others

   $ 23,058       $ 25,648   

Accepted from others:

       

Permitted by contract or custom to sell or repledge

     1,122         1,015   

Permitted amount repledged to others

     888         685   

The securities pledged to others include positions held in our portfolio of investment securities, trading securities, and securities accepted as collateral from others that we are permitted by contract or custom to sell or repledge, and were used to secure public and trust deposits, repurchase agreements, and for other purposes. The securities accepted from others that we are permitted by contract or custom to sell or repledge are a component of Federal funds sold and resale agreements on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    117


Table of Contents

NOTE 9 FAIR VALUE

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT

GAAP establishes a fair value reporting hierarchy to maximize the use of observable inputs when measuring fair value. There are three levels of inputs used to measure fair value. For more information regarding the fair value hierarchy and the valuation methodologies for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, see Note 9 Fair Value in our Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of our 2012 Form 10-K.

VALUATION PROCESSES

We have various processes and controls in place to help ensure that fair value is reasonably estimated. Any models used to determine fair values or to validate dealer quotes are subject to review and independent testing as part of our model validation and internal control testing processes. Our Model Risk Management Committee reviews significant models at least annually. In addition, we have teams independent of the traders that verify marks and assumptions used for valuations at each period end.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value, by their nature, result in a higher degree of financial statement volatility. Assets and liabilities classified within Level 3 inherently require the use of various assumptions, estimates and judgments when measuring their fair value. As observable market activity is commonly not available to use when estimating the fair value of Level 3 assets and liabilities, we must estimate fair value using various modeling techniques. These techniques include the use of a variety of inputs/assumptions including credit quality, liquidity, interest rates or other relevant inputs across the entire population of our Level 3 assets and liabilities. Changes in the significant underlying factors or assumptions (either an increase or a decrease) in any of these areas underlying our estimates may result in a significant increase/decrease in the Level 3 fair value measurement of a particular asset and/or liability from period to period.

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS ACCOUNTED FOR AT FAIR VALUE ON A RECURRING BASIS

A cross-functional team comprised of representatives from Asset & Liability Management, Finance, and Market Risk Management oversees the governance of the processes and methodologies used to estimate the fair value of securities and the price validation testing that is performed. This management team reviews pricing sources and trends and the results of validation testing.

For more information regarding the fair value of financial instruments accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis, see Note 9 Fair Value in our Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of our 2012 Form 10-K.

The following disclosures for financial instruments accounted for at fair value have been updated during the first six months of 2013:

LOANS

Loans accounted for at fair value consist primarily of residential mortgage loans. These loans are generally valued similarly to residential mortgage loans held for sale and are classified as Level 2. However, similar to residential mortgage loans held for sale, if these loans are repurchased and unsalable, they are classified as Level 3. During the first quarter of 2013, we have elected to account for certain home equity lines of credit at fair value. These loans are classified as Level 3. This category also includes repurchased brokered home equity loans. These loans are repurchased due to a breach of representations or warranties in the loan sales agreements and occur typically after the loan is in default. The fair value price is based on bids and market observations of transactions of similar vintage. Because transaction details regarding the credit and underwriting quality are often unavailable, unobservable bid information from brokers and investors is heavily relied upon. Accordingly, based on the significance of unobservable inputs, these loans are classified as Level 3. The fair value of these loans is included in the Loans – Home equity line item in Table 91: Fair Value Measurement – Recurring Quantitative Information in this Note 9 for both June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. A significant input to the valuation includes a credit and liquidity discount that is deemed representative of current market conditions. Significant increases (decreases) in this assumption would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement.

OTHER BORROWED FUNDS

During the first quarter of 2013, we have elected to account for certain other borrowed funds consisting primarily of secured debt at fair value. These other borrowed funds are classified as Level 3. Significant unobservable inputs for these borrowed funds include credit and liquidity discount and spread over the benchmark curve. Significant increases (decreases) in these assumptions would result in significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement.

FINANCIAL DERIVATIVES

In connection with the sales of a portion of our Visa Class B common shares in the second quarter of 2013 and the second half of 2012, we entered into swap agreements with the purchaser of the shares to account for future changes in the value of the Class B common shares resulting from changes in the settlement of certain specified litigation and its effect on the conversion rate of Class B common shares into Visa Class A common shares and to make payments calculated by reference to the market price of the Class A common shares and a fixed rate of interest. The swaps are classified as Level 3 instruments and the fair values of the liability positions totaled $61 million at June 30, 2013 and $43 million at December 31, 2012, respectively.

 

 

118    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, including instruments for which PNC has elected the fair value option, follow.

Table 89: Fair Value Measurements – Summary

 

    June 30, 2013     December 31, 2012  
In millions   Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Total
Fair Value
    Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Total
Fair Value
 

Assets

                 

Securities available for sale

                 

U.S. Treasury and government agencies

  $ 1,480      $ 730        $ 2,210      $ 2,269      $ 844        $ 3,113   

Residential mortgage-backed

                 

Agency

      24,248          24,248          26,784          26,784   

Non-agency

      141      $ 5,711        5,852          $ 6,107        6,107   

Commercial mortgage-backed

                 

Agency

      595          595          633          633   

Non-agency

      3,679          3,679          3,264          3,264   

Asset-backed

      5,362        672        6,034          4,945        708        5,653   

State and municipal

      1,886        331        2,217          1,948        339        2,287   

Other debt

            2,719        48        2,767                2,796        48        2,844   

Total debt securities

    1,480        39,360        6,762        47,602        2,269        41,214        7,202        50,685   

Corporate stocks and other

    281        16                297        351        16                367   

Total securities available for sale

    1,761        39,376        6,762        47,899        2,620        41,230        7,202        51,052   

Financial derivatives (a) (b)

                 

Interest rate contracts

    27        6,248        50        6,325        5        8,326        101        8,432   

Other contracts

            259        1        260                131        5        136   

Total financial derivatives

    27        6,507        51        6,585        5        8,457        106        8,568   

Residential mortgage loans held for sale (c)

      2,216        30        2,246          2,069        27        2,096   

Trading securities (d)

                 

Debt (e) (f)

    1,277        781        32        2,090        1,062        951        32        2,045   

Equity

    19                        19        42        9                51   

Total trading securities

    1,296        781        32        2,109        1,104        960        32        2,096   

Trading loans

      21          21          76          76   

Residential mortgage servicing rights (g)

        975        975            650        650   

Commercial mortgage loans held for sale (c)

        635        635            772        772   

Equity investments

                 

Direct investments

        1,115        1,115            1,171        1,171   

Indirect investments (h)

                    623        623                        642        642   

Total equity investments

                    1,738        1,738                        1,813        1,813   

Customer resale agreements (i)

      210          210          256          256   

Loans (j)

      500        311        811          110        134        244   

Other assets

                 

BlackRock Series C Preferred Stock (k)

        270        270            243        243   

Other

    330        189        8        527        283        194        9        486   

Total other assets

    330        189        278        797        283        194        252        729   

Total assets

  $ 3,414      $ 49,800      $ 10,812      $ 64,026      $ 4,012      $ 53,352      $ 10,988      $ 68,352   

Liabilities

                 

Financial derivatives (b) (l)

                 

Interest rate contracts

  $ 12      $ 4,771      $ 48      $ 4,831      $ 1      $ 6,105      $ 12      $ 6,118   

BlackRock LTIP

        270        270            243        243   

Other contracts

            164        65        229                128        121        249   

Total financial derivatives

    12        4,935        383        5,330        1        6,233        376        6,610   

Trading securities sold short (m)

                 

Debt

    929        3                932        731        10                741   

Total trading securities sold short

    929        3                932        731        10                741   

Other borrowed funds

        195        195             

Other liabilities

                                            5                5   

Total liabilities

  $ 941      $ 4,938      $ 578      $ 6,457      $ 732      $ 6,248      $ 376      $ 7,356   

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    119


Table of Contents
(a) Included in Other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(b) Amounts at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are presented gross and are not reduced by the impact of legally enforceable master netting agreements that allow PNC to net positive and negative positions and cash collateral held or placed with the same counterparty. The net asset amounts were $2.2 billion at June 30, 2013 compared with $2.4 billion at December 31, 2012 and the net liability amounts were $1.1 billion and $.6 billion, respectively.
(c) Included in Loans held for sale on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. PNC has elected the fair value option for certain commercial and residential mortgage loans held for sale.
(d) Fair value includes net unrealized losses of $13 million at June 30, 2013 compared with net unrealized gains of $59 million at December 31, 2012.
(e) Approximately 23% of these securities are residential mortgage-backed securities and 61% are U.S. Treasury and government agencies securities at June 30, 2013. Comparable amounts at December 31, 2012 were 25% and 52%, respectively.
(f) At both June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the balance of residential mortgage-backed agency securities with embedded derivatives carried in Trading securities was zero.
(g) Included in Other intangible assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(h) The indirect equity funds are not redeemable, but PNC receives distributions over the life of the partnership from liquidation of the underlying investments by the investee, which we expect to occur over the next twelve years. The amount of unfunded contractual commitments related to indirect equity investments was $134 million and related to direct equity investments was $37 million as of June 30, 2013, respectively.
(i) Included in Federal funds sold and resale agreements on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. PNC has elected the fair value option for these items.
(j) Included in Loans on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(k) PNC has elected the fair value option for these shares.
(l) Included in Other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(m) Included in Other borrowed funds on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Reconciliations of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using Level 3 inputs for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 follow.

Table 90: Reconciliation of Level 3 Assets and Liabilities

Three Months Ended June 30, 2013

 

Level 3 Instruments Only

In millions

  Fair Value
March 31,
2013
   

Total realized / unrealized

gains or losses for the period (a) 

    Purchases     Sales     Issuances     Settlements     Transfers
into
Level 3 (b)
    Transfers
out of
Level 3 (b)
    Fair
Value
June 30,
2013
   

Unrealized

gains (losses)

on assets and
liabilities held on

Consolidated
Balance Sheet

at June 30,

2013 (c)

 
    Included in
Earnings
   

Included

in Other

comprehensive

income

                 

Assets

                                                                                       

Securities available for sale

                       

Residential mortgage-backed non-agency

  $ 6,038      $ 47      $ (100         $ (274       $ 5,711      $ (3

Commercial mortgage-backed non-agency

      2                (2          

Asset-backed

    701        1        4              (34         672        (1

State and municipal

    330          (2   $ 4            (1         331       

Other debt

    49                        1      $ (2                                     48           

Total securities available for sale

    7,118        50        (98     5        (2             (311                     6,762        (4

Financial derivatives

    93        64          1            (105     $ (2     51        50   

Residential mortgage loans held for sale

    44            21        (1       1      $ 3        (38     30       

Trading securities – Debt

    32                        32       

Residential mortgage servicing rights

    779        208            $ 43        (55         975        208   

Commercial mortgage loans held for sale

    769        (13         (100       (21         635        (14

Equity investments

                       

Direct investments

    1,193        15          49        (142             1,115       

Indirect investments

    627        20                6        (30                                     623        20   

Total equity investments

    1,820        35                55        (172                                     1,738        20   

Loans

    272        16                (10     45        (12     311        12   

Other assets

                       

BlackRock Series C Preferred Stock

    270                        270       

Other

    9                (1                                                     8           

Total other assets

    279                (1                                                     278           

Total assets

  $ 11,206      $ 360  (e)    $ (99   $ 82      $ (275   $ 43      $ (501   $ 48      $ (52   $ 10,812      $ 272  (f) 

Liabilities

                       

Financial derivatives (d)

    400        84            1          (102         383        16   

Other borrowed funds

    130        3                                        62                        195           

Total liabilities

  $ 530      $ 87  (e)                    $ 1              $ (40                   $ 578      $ 16  (f) 

 

120    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

Three Months Ended June 30, 2012

 

          

Total realized /

unrealized

gains or losses

for the period (a)

                                             

Unrealized

gains (losses)

on assets and

liabilities

held on

 
Level 3 Instruments
Only

In millions
  Fair Value
March 31,
2012
    Included in
Earnings
    Included
in Other
comprehensive
income
    Purchases     Sales     Issuances     Settlements     Transfers
out of
Level 3 (b)
    Fair
Value
June 30,
2012
    Consolidated
Balance
Sheet
at June 30,
2012 (c)
 

Assets

                       

Securities available for sale

                       

Residential mortgage-backed non-agency

  $ 6,121      $ 20      $ (34   $ 47          $ (267     $ 5,887      $ (31

Commercial mortgage-backed non-agency

      1                (1          

Asset-backed

    752        (1     17        $ (47       (33       688        (3

State and municipal

    336        1                    337       

Other debt

    55                        3        (3                             55           

Total securities available for sale

    7,264        21        (17     50        (50             (301             6,967        (34

Financial derivatives

    84        115          1            (82   $ (1     117        123   

Trading securities – Debt

    39        2                    41        1   

Residential mortgage servicing rights

    724        (126         $ 24        (41       581        (124

Commercial mortgage loans held for sale

    840        4                (7       837        (2

Equity investments

                       

Direct investments

    865        20          116        (44           957        20   

Indirect investments

    657        37                19        (36                             677        35   

Total equity investments

    1,522        57                135        (80                             1,634        55   

Loans

    6            1                7       

Other assets

                       

BlackRock Series C
Preferred Stock

    241        (41                 200        (41

Other

    7                                                                7           

Total other assets

    248        (41                                                     207        (41

Total assets

  $ 10,727      $ 32  (e)    $ (17   $ 187      $ (130   $ 24      $ (431   $ (1   $ 10,391      $ (22 ) (f) 

Total liabilities (d)

  $ 334      $ (56 ) (e)                    $ 1              $ 10              $ 289      $ (40 ) (f) 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    121


Table of Contents

Six Months Ended June 30, 2013

 

          

Total realized /

unrealized

gains or losses

for the period (a)

                                                    

Unrealized
gains (losses)
on assets and
liabilities

held on

 
Level 3 Instruments Only
In millions
  Fair Value
Dec. 31,
2012
    Included in
Earnings
   

Included

in Other
comprehensive
income

    Purchases     Sales     Issuances     Settlements     Transfers
into
Level 3 (b)
    Transfers
out of
Level 3 (b)
   

Fair

Value
June 30,
2013

   

Consolidated

Balance
Sheet
at June 30,
2013 (c)

 

Assets

                         

Securities available for sale

                         

Residential mortgage-backed non-agency

  $ 6,107      $ 90      $ 39            $ (525       $ 5,711      $ (10

Commercial mortgage-backed non-agency

      3                (3            

Asset-backed

    708        4        29              (69         672        (4

State and municipal

    339        1        $ 4            (13         331       

Other debt

    48                        2      $ (2                                     48           

Total securities available for sale

    7,202        98        68        6        (2             (610                     6,762        (14

Financial derivatives

    106        153          2            (208     $ (2     51        113   

Residential mortgage loans held for sale

    27        1          49        (1       1      $ 6        (53     30        1   

Trading securities – Debt

    32                        32       

Residential mortgage servicing rights

    650        286          64        $ 80        (105         975        279   

Commercial mortgage loans held for sale

    772        (12         (102       (23         635        (13

Equity investments

                         

Direct investments

    1,171        34          63        (153             1,115        14   

Indirect investments

    642        33                10        (62                                     623        33   

Total equity investments

    1,813        67                73        (215                                     1,738        47   

Loans

    134        21                115        57        (16     311        17   

Other assets

                         

BlackRock Series C
Preferred Stock

    243        60                (33         270        60   

Other

    9                (1                                                     8           

Total other assets

    252        60        (1                             (33                     278        60   

Total assets

  $ 10,988      $ 674  (e)    $ 67      $ 194      $ (320   $ 80      $ (863   $ 63      $ (71   $ 10,812      $ 490  (f) 

Liabilities

                         

Financial derivatives (d)

    376        160            1          (154         383        77   

Other borrowed funds

            3                                        192                        195           

Total liabilities

  $ 376      $ 163  (e)                    $ 1              $ 38                      $ 578      $ 77  (f) 

 

122    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

Six Months Ended June 30, 2012

 

          

Total realized /

unrealized

gains or losses

for the period (a)

                                                    

Unrealized
gains (losses)

on assets and

liabilities

held on

Consolidated
Balance
Sheet

at June 30,

2012 (c)

 

Level 3 Instruments Only

In millions

  Fair Value
Dec. 31,
2011
    Included in
Earnings
    Included
in Other
comprehensive
income
    Purchases     Sales     Issuances     Settlements     Transfers
into
Level 3 (b)
    Transfers
out of
Level 3 (b)
    Fair
Value
June 30,
2012
   

Assets

                                                                                       

Securities available for sale

                       

Residential mortgage-backed non-agency

  $ 5,557      $ 11      $ 486      $ 47      $ (163     $ (509   $ 458        $ 5,887      $ (63

Commercial mortgage backed non-agency

      2                (2          

Asset-backed

    787        (7     59          (87       (64         688        (8

State and municipal

    336          3              (2         337       

Other debt

    49        (1     1        9        (3                                     55        (1

Total securities available for sale

    6,729        5        549        56        (253             (577     458                6,967        (72

Financial derivatives

    67        195          4            (150     3      $ (2     117        176   

Trading securities – Debt

    39        3                (1         41        2   

Residential mortgage servicing rights

    647        (106       64        $ 53        (77         581        (104

Commercial mortgage loans held for sale

    843        (2         (4             837        (4

Equity investments

                       

Direct investments

    856        42          159        (100             957        41   

Indirect investments

    648        68                30        (69                                     677        65   

Total equity investments

    1,504        110                189        (169                                     1,634        106   

Loans

    5            2                  7       

Other assets

                       

BlackRock Series C

                       

Preferred Stock

    210        (10)                      200        (10)   

Other

    7                                                                        7           

Total other assets

    217        (10)                                                                207        (10)   

Total assets

  $ 10,051      $ 195  (e)    $ 549      $ 315      $ (426   $ 53      $ (805   $ 461      $ (2   $ 10,391      $ 94  (f) 

Total liabilities (d)

  $ 308      $ 21  (e)                    $ 1              $ (40   $ 1      $ (2   $ 289      $ (8)  (f) 
(a) Losses for assets are bracketed while losses for liabilities are not.
(b) PNC’s policy is to recognize transfers in and transfers out as of the end of the reporting period.
(c) The amount of the total gains or losses for the period included in earnings that is attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses related to those assets and liabilities held at the end of the reporting period.
(d) Financial derivatives, which include swaps entered into in connection with sales of certain Visa Class B common shares.
(e) Net gains (realized and unrealized) included in earnings relating to Level 3 assets and liabilities were $273 million for the second quarter of 2013, while for the first six months of 2013 there were $511 million of net gains (realized and unrealized) included in earnings. The comparative amounts included net gains (realized and unrealized) of $88 million for second quarter 2012 and net gains (realized and unrealized) of $174 million for the first six months of 2012. These amounts also included amortization and accretion of $54 million for the second quarter of 2013 and $111 million for the first six months of 2013. The comparative amounts were $54 million for the second quarter of 2012 and $86 million for the first six months of 2012. The amortization and accretion amounts were included in Interest income on the Consolidated Income Statement, and the remaining net gains/(losses) (realized and unrealized) were included in Noninterest income on the Consolidated Income Statement.
(f) Net unrealized gains relating to those assets and liabilities held at the end of the reporting period were $256 million for the second quarter of 2013, while for the first six months of 2013 there were $413 million of net unrealized gains. The comparative amounts included net unrealized gains of $18 million for the second quarter of 2012 and net unrealized gains of $102 million for the first six months of 2012. These amounts were included in Noninterest income on the Consolidated Income Statement.

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    123


Table of Contents

An instrument’s categorization within the hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. PNC reviews and updates fair value hierarchy classifications quarterly. Changes from one quarter to the next related to the observability of inputs to a fair value measurement may result in a reclassification (transfer) of assets or liabilities between hierarchy levels. PNC’s policy is to recognize transfers in and transfers out as of the end of the reporting period. During the first six months of 2013, there were transfers of residential mortgage loans held for sale and loans from Level 2 to Level 3 of $6 million and $11 million, respectively, as a result of reduced market activity in the nonperforming residential mortgage sales market which reduced the observability of valuation inputs. Also during 2013, there were transfers out of Level 3 residential mortgage loans held for sale and loans of $7 million and $16 million, respectively, primarily due to the transfer of residential mortgage loans held for sale and loans to OREO. In addition, there was approximately $46 million of Level 3 residential mortgage loans held for sale reclassified to Level 3 loans during the first six months of 2013 due to the loans being reclassified from held for sale loans to held in portfolio loans. This amount was included in Transfers out of Level 3 residential mortgages loans held for sale and Transfers into Level 3 loans within Table 90: Reconciliation of Level 3 Assets and Liabilities. In the comparable period of 2012, there were transfers of assets and liabilities from Level 2 to Level 3 of $460 million consisting of mortgage-backed available for sale securities transferred as a result of a ratings downgrade which reduced the observability of valuation inputs.

Quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs within Level 3 recurring assets and liabilities follows.

Table 91: Fair Value Measurement – Recurring Quantitative Information

June 30, 2013

 

Level 3 Instruments Only

Dollars in millions

  Fair Value     Valuation Techniques   Unobservable Inputs   Range (Weighted Average)  

Residential mortgage-backed non-agency

  $ 5,711      Priced by a third-party vendor   Constant prepayment rate (CPR)   1.0%-27.0%(5.0%)     (a
    using a discounted cash flow   Constant default rate (CDR)   0%-22.0%(7.0%)     (a
    pricing model (a)   Loss Severity   6.0%-100%(51.0%)     (a
      Spread over the benchmark curve (b)   267bps weighted average     (a

Asset-backed

    672      Priced by a third-party vendor   Constant prepayment rate (CPR)   1.0%-11.0%(4.0%) (a)    
    using a discounted cash flow   Constant default rate (CDR)   3.0%-19.0%(10.0%) (a)    
    pricing model (a)   Loss Severity   10.0%-100%(73.0%) (a)    
      Spread over the benchmark curve (b)   358bps weighted average     (a

State and municipal

    130      Discounted cash flow   Spread over the benchmark curve (b)   85bps-240bps (101bps)    
    201      Consensus pricing (c)   Credit and Liquidity discount   0%-30.0%(8.0%)    

Other debt

    48      Consensus pricing (c)   Credit and Liquidity discount   7.0%-95.0%(86.0%)    

Commercial mortgage loan commitments

    37      Discounted cash flow   Spread over the benchmark curve (b) Embedded servicing value   80bps-500bps (153bps) .8%-3.0%(1.1%)    

Trading securities - Debt

    32      Consensus pricing (c)   Credit and Liquidity discount   0%-20.0%(8.3%)    

Residential mortgage loans held for sale

    30      Consensus pricing (c)   Cumulative default rate   2.6%-100%(6.8%)    
      Loss Severity   0%-86.7%(47.9%)    
      Gross discount rate   13.0%-14.0%(13.3%)    

Residential mortgage servicing rights

    975      Discounted cash flow   Constant prepayment rate (CPR)   3.8%-48.7%(10.1%)    
      Spread over the benchmark curve (b)   939bps-1,918bps (1,096bps)    

Commercial mortgage loans held for sale

    635      Discounted cash flow   Spread over the benchmark curve (b)   460bps-5,160bps (947bps)    

Equity investments - Direct investments

    1,115      Multiple of adjusted earnings   Multiple of earnings   4.5x-9.5x (7.1x)    

Equity investments - Indirect (d)

    623      Net asset value   Net asset value      

Loans - Residential real estate

    178      Consensus pricing (c)   Cumulative default rate   2.6%-100%(85.7%)    
      Loss Severity   0%-100%(52.9%)    
      Gross discount rate   12.0%    

Loans - Home equity

    133      Consensus pricing (c)   Credit and Liquidity discount   37.0%-99.0%(69.0%)    

BlackRock Series C Preferred Stock

    270      Consensus pricing (c)   Liquidity discount   20.0%    

BlackRock LTIP

    (270   Consensus pricing (c)   Liquidity discount   20.0%    

Swaps related to sales of certain Visa

    (61   Discounted cash flow   Estimated conversion factor of      

Class B common shares

      Class B shares into Class A shares   41.5%    
      Estimated growth rate of Visa      
      Class A share price   7.6%    

Other borrowed funds (e)

    (195   Consensus pricing (c)   Credit and Liquidity discount   0%-99.0%(43.0%)    
      Spread over the benchmark curve (b)   58bps    

Insignificant Level 3 assets, net of liabilities (f)

    (30          
 

 

 

           

Total Level 3 assets, net of liabilities (g)

  $ 10,234                       

 

124    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

December 31, 2012

 

Level 3 Instruments Only

Dollars in millions

  Fair Value     Valuation Techniques   Unobservable Inputs   Range (Weighted Average)  

Residential mortgage-backed non-agency

  $ 6,107      Priced by a third-party vendor   Constant prepayment rate (CPR)   1.0%-30.0%(5.0%)     (a
    using a discounted cash flow   Constant default rate (CDR)   0%-24.0%(7.0%)     (a
    pricing model (a)   Loss Severity   10.0%-95.0%(52.0%)     (a
      Spread over the benchmark curve (b)   315bps weighted average     (a

Asset-backed

    708      Priced by a third-party vendor   Constant prepayment rate (CPR)   1.0%-11.0%(3.0%)     (a
    using a discounted cash flow   Constant default rate (CDR)   1.0%-25.0%(9.0%)     (a
    pricing model (a)   Loss Severity   10.0%-100%(70.0%)     (a
      Spread over the benchmark curve (b)   511bps weighted average     (a

State and municipal

    130      Discounted cash flow   Spread over the benchmark curve (b)   100bps-280bps (119bps)    
    209      Consensus pricing (c)   Credit and Liquidity discount   0%-30.0%(8.0%)    

Other debt

    48      Consensus pricing (c)   Credit and Liquidity discount   7.0%-95.0%(86.0%)    

Residential mortgage loan commitments

    85      Discounted cash flow   Probability of funding   8.5%-99.0%(71.1%)    
      Embedded servicing value   .5%-1.2%(.9%)    

Trading securities - Debt

    32      Consensus pricing (c)   Credit and Liquidity discount   8.0%-20.0%(12.0%)    

Residential mortgage loans held

    27      Consensus pricing (c)   Cumulative default rate   2.6%-100%(76.1%)    

for sale

      Loss Severity   0%-92.7%(55.8%)    
      Gross discount rate   14.0%-15.3%(14.9%)    

Residential mortgage servicing rights

    650      Discounted cash flow   Constant prepayment rate (CPR)   3.9%-57.3%(18.8%)    
      Spread over the benchmark curve (b)   939bps-1,929bps (1,115bps)    

Commercial mortgage loans held for sale

    772      Discounted cash flow   Spread over the benchmark curve (b)   485bps-4,155bps (999bps)    

Equity investments - Direct investments

    1,171      Multiple of adjusted earnings   Multiple of earnings   4.5x-10.0x (7.1x)    

Equity investments - Indirect (d)

    642      Net asset value   Net asset value      

Loans - Residential real estate

    127      Consensus pricing (c)   Cumulative default rate   2.6%-100%(76.3%)    
      Loss Severity   0%-99.4%(61.1%)    
      Gross discount rate   12.0%-12.5%(12.2%)    

Loans - Home equity

    7      Consensus pricing (c)   Credit and Liquidity discount   37.0%-97.0%(65.0%)    

BlackRock Series C Preferred Stock

    243      Consensus pricing (c)   Liquidity discount   22.5%    

BlackRock LTIP

    (243   Consensus pricing (c)   Liquidity discount   22.5%    

Other derivative contracts

    (72   Discounted cash flow   Credit and Liquidity discount   37.0%-99.0%(46.0%)    
      Spread over the benchmark curve (b)   79bps    

Swaps related to sales of certain

    (43   Discounted cash flow   Estimated conversion factor of      

Visa Class B common shares

      Class B shares into Class A shares   41.5%    
      Estimated growth rate of Visa Class      
      A share price   12.6%    

Insignificant Level 3 assets, net of liabilities (f)

    12             
 

 

 

           

Total Level 3 assets, net of liabilities (g)

  $ 10,612                       
(a) Level 3 residential mortgage-backed non-agency and asset-backed securities with fair values as of June 30, 2013 totaling $5,013 million and $642 million, respectively, were priced by a third-party vendor using a discounted cash flow pricing model, that incorporates consensus pricing, where available. The comparable amounts as of December 31, 2012 were $5,363 million and $677 million, respectively. The significant unobservable inputs for these securities were provided by the third-party vendor and are disclosed in the table. Our procedures to validate the prices provided by the third-party vendor related to these securities are discussed further in the Fair Value Measurement section of Note 9 Fair Value in our Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of our 2012 Form 10-K. Certain Level 3 residential mortgage-backed non-agency and asset-backed securities with fair values as of June 30, 2013 of $698 million and $30 million, respectively, were valued using a pricing source, such as a dealer quote or comparable security price, for which the significant unobservable inputs used to determine the price were not reasonably available. The comparable amounts as of December 31, 2012 were $744 million and $31 million, respectively.
(b) The assumed yield spread over the benchmark curve for each instrument is generally intended to incorporate non-interest-rate risks such as credit and liquidity risks.
(c) Consensus pricing refers to fair value estimates that are generally internally developed using information such as dealer quotes or other third-party provided valuations or comparable asset prices.
(d) The range on these indirect equity investments has not been disclosed since these investments are recorded at their net asset redemption values.
(e) Relates to a Non-agency securitization that PNC consolidated in the first quarter of 2013.
(f) Represents the aggregate amount of Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis that are individually and in the aggregate insignificant. The amount includes loans and certain financial derivative assets and liabilities and other assets.
(g) Consisted of total Level 3 assets of $10,812 million and total Level 3 liabilities of $578 million as of June 30, 2013 and $10,988 million and $376 million as of December 31, 2012, respectively.

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    125


Table of Contents

OTHER FINANCIAL ASSETS ACCOUNTED FOR AT FAIR VALUE ON A NONRECURRING BASIS

We may be required to measure certain other financial assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These adjustments to fair value usually result from the application of lower-of-cost-or-fair value accounting or write-downs of individual assets due to impairment and are included in Table 92: Fair Value Measurements – Nonrecurring and Table 93: Fair Value Measurements – Nonrecurring Quantitative Information. For more information regarding the valuation methodologies for assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, see Note 9 Fair Value in our Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements under item 8 of our 2012 Form 10-K.

Table 92: Fair Value Measurements – Nonrecurring (a)

 

     Fair Value      Gains (Losses)
Three months ended
     Gains (Losses)
Six months ended
 
In millions    June 30
2013
     December 31
2012
     June 30
2013
     June 30
2012
     June 30
2013
     June 30
2012
 

Assets

                   

Nonaccrual loans

   $ 83       $ 158       $ (9    $ (42    $ (10    $ (96

Loans held for sale

     209         315         (11      (1      (11      (1

Equity investments

     6         12         (3         (3     

Commercial mortgage servicing rights

     519         191         60         (14      73         (9

OREO and foreclosed assets

     199         207         (19      (32      (33      (59

Long-lived assets held for sale

     52         24         (12      (6      (27      (13

Total assets

   $ 1,068       $ 907       $ 6       $ (95    $ (11    $ (178
(a) All Level 3 as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

Quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs within Level 3 nonrecurring assets follows.

Table 93: Fair Value Measurements – Nonrecurring Quantitative Information

 

Level 3 Instruments Only

Dollars in millions

  Fair Value     Valuation Techniques   Unobservable Inputs   Range (Weighted  Average)

June 30, 2013

         

Assets

         

Nonaccrual loans (a)

  $ 64      Fair value of collateral   Loss severity   6.3%-85.2%(35.1%)

Loans held for sale

    209      Discounted cash flow   Spread over the benchmark curve (b)   80bps-247bps (109bps)
      Embedded servicing value   .8%-3.0%(2.8%)

Equity Investments

    6      Discounted cash flow   Market rate of return   6.5%

Commercial mortgage servicing rights

    519      Discounted cash flow   Constant prepayment rate (CPR) Discount rate   6.2%-11.7%(6.9%) 6.2%-7.5%(7.1%)

Other (c)

    270      Fair value of property or collateral   Appraised value/sales price   Not meaningful
 

 

 

         

Total Assets

  $ 1,068               

December 31, 2012

         

Assets

         

Nonaccrual loans (a)

  $ 90      Fair value of collateral   Loss severity   4.6%-97.2%(58.1%)

Loans held for sale

    315      Discounted cash flow   Spread over the benchmark curve (b) Embedded servicing value   40bps-233bps (86bps) .8%-2.6%(2.0%)

Equity Investments

    12      Discounted cash flow   Market rate of return   4.6%-6.5%(5.4%)

Commercial mortgage servicing rights

    191      Discounted cash flow   Constant prepayment rate (CPR) Discount rate   7.1%-20.1%(7.8%) 5.6%-7.8%(7.7%)

Other (c)

    299      Fair value of property or collateral   Appraised value/sales price   Not meaningful
 

 

 

         

Total Assets

  $ 907               
(a) The fair value of nonaccrual loans included in this line item is determined based on internal loss rates. The fair value of nonaccrual loans where the fair value is determined based on the appraised value or sales price is included within Other, below.
(b) The assumed yield spread over benchmark curve for each instrument is generally intended to incorporate non-interest-rate risks such as credit and liquidity risks.
(c) Other included nonaccrual loans of $19 million, OREO and foreclosed assets of $199 million and Long-lived assets held for sale of $52 million as of June 30, 2013. Comparably, as of December 31, 2012, Other included nonaccrual loans of $68 million, OREO and foreclosed assets of $207 million and Long-lived assets held for sale of $24 million. The fair value of these assets are determined based on appraised value or sales price, the range of which is not meaningful to disclose.

 

126    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

FINANCIAL ASSETS ACCOUNTED FOR UNDER FAIR VALUE OPTION

For more information regarding assets we elected to measure at fair value under fair value option on our Consolidated Balance Sheet, see Note 9 Fair Value in our Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of our 2012 Form 10-K.

The following disclosures for financial instruments accounted for at fair value under fair value option have been updated for the first six months of 2013 as PNC consolidated a Non-agency securitization resulting in an incremental $125 million of home equity lines of credit and $195 million of other borrowed funds, of which $70 million had previously been recorded in our financial statements.

Residential Mortgage Loans – Portfolio

Interest income on the Home Equity Lines of Credit for which we have elected the fair value option during first quarter 2013 is reported on the Consolidated Income Statement in Loan interest income.

Other Borrowed Funds

Interest expense on the Other borrowed funds for which we have elected the fair value option during first quarter 2013 is reported on the Consolidated Income Statement in Borrowed funds interest expense.

The changes in fair value included in Noninterest income for items for which we elected the fair value option are included in the table below.

 

 

Table 94: Fair Value Option – Changes in Fair Value (a)

 

     Gains (Losses)
Three months ended
     Gains (Losses)
Six months ended
 
In millions    June 30
2013
     June 30
2012
     June 30
2013
     June 30
2012
 

Assets

             

Customer resale agreements

   $ (3    $ (2    $ (5    $ (6

Residential mortgage-backed agency securities with embedded derivatives (b)

        (1         13   

Trading loans

     1            2        

Commercial mortgage loans held for sale

     (13      4         (12      (2

Residential mortgage loans held for sale

     (48      (287      66         (200

Residential mortgage loans – portfolio

     13         (9      19         (26

BlackRock Series C Preferred Stock

        (41      60         (10

Liabilities

             

Other borrowed funds

     (3               (3         
(a) The impact on earnings of offsetting hedged items or hedging instruments is not reflected in these amounts.
(b) These residential mortgage-backed agency securities with embedded derivatives were carried as Trading securities.

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    127


Table of Contents

Fair values and aggregate unpaid principal balances of items for which we elected the fair value option follow.

Table 95: Fair Value Option – Fair Value and Principal Balances

 

In millions    Fair Value      Aggregate Unpaid
Principal Balance
     Difference  

June 30, 2013

          

Assets

          

Customer resale agreements

   $ 210       $ 196       $ 14   

Trading loans

     21         22         (1

Residential mortgage loans held for sale

          

Performing loans

     2,200         2,196         4   

Accruing loans 90 days or more past due

     5         4         1   

Nonaccrual loans

     41         67         (26

Total

     2,246         2,267         (21

Commercial mortgage loans held for sale (a)

          

Performing loans

     632         739         (107

Nonaccrual loans

     3         7         (4

Total

     635         746         (111

Residential mortgage loans – portfolio

          

Performing loans

     179         282         (103

Accruing loans 90 days or more past due (b)

     331         535         (204

Nonaccrual loans

     301         530         (229

Total

     811         1,347         (536

Liabilities

          

Other borrowed funds (c)

   $ 195       $ 344       $ (149

December 31, 2012

          

Assets

          

Customer resale agreements

   $ 256       $ 237       $ 19   

Trading loans

     76         76        

Residential mortgage loans held for sale

          

Performing loans

     2,072         1,971         101   

Accruing loans 90 days or more past due

     8         14         (6

Nonaccrual loans

     16         36         (20

Total

     2,096         2,021         75   

Commercial mortgage loans held for sale (a)

          

Performing loans

     766         889         (123

Nonaccrual loans

     6         12         (6

Total

     772         901         (129

Residential mortgage loans – portfolio

          

Performing loans

     58         116         (58

Accruing loans 90 days or more past due (b)

     116         141         (25

Nonaccrual loans

     70         207         (137

Total

   $ 244       $ 464       $ (220
(a) There were no accruing loans 90 days or more past due within this category at June 30, 2013 or December 31, 2012.
(b) The majority of these loans are government insured loans, which positively impacts the fair value.
(c) Related to a Non-agency securitization that PNC consolidated in the first quarter of 2013.

 

128    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

The following table provides additional information regarding the fair value and classification within the fair value hierarchy of financial instruments.

Table 96: Additional Fair Value Information Related to Financial Instruments

 

In millions

  

Carrying

Amount

     Fair Value  
      Total      Level 1      Level 2      Level 3  

June 30, 2013

                

Assets

                

Cash and due from banks

   $ 4,051       $ 4,051       $ 4,051           

Short-term assets

     6,454         6,454          $ 6,454        

Trading securities

     2,109         2,109         1,296         781       $ 32   

Investment securities

     57,449         57,648         2,016         48,848         6,784   

Trading loans

     21         21            21        

Loans held for sale

     3,814         3,819            2,216         1,603   

Net loans (excludes leases)

     178,656         180,811            500         180,311   

Other assets

     4,168         4,168         330         1,822         2,016   

Mortgage servicing rights

     1,500         1,505               1,505   

Financial derivatives

                

Designated as hedging instruments under GAAP

     1,380         1,380            1,380        

Not designated as hedging instruments under GAAP

     5,205         5,205         27         5,127         51   

Total Assets

   $ 264,807       $ 267,171       $ 7,720       $ 67,149       $ 192,302   

Liabilities

                

Demand, savings and money market deposits

   $ 186,645       $ 186,645          $ 186,645        

Time deposits

     25,634         25,694            25,694        

Borrowed funds

     40,109         40,855       $ 929         38,695       $ 1,231   

Financial derivatives

                

Designated as hedging instruments under GAAP

     329         329            329        

Not designated as hedging instruments under GAAP

     5,001         5,001         12         4,606         383   

Unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit

     225         225                           225   

Total Liabilities

   $ 257,943       $ 258,749       $ 941       $ 255,969       $ 1,839   

December 31, 2012

                

Assets

                

Cash and due from banks

   $ 5,220       $ 5,220       $ 5,220           

Short-term assets

     6,495         6,495          $ 6,495        

Trading securities

     2,096         2,096         1,104         960       $ 32   

Investment securities

     61,406         61,912         2,897         51,789         7,226   

Trading loans

     76         76            76        

Loans held for sale

     3,693         3,697            2,069         1,628   

Net loans (excludes leases)

     174,575         177,215            110         177,105   

Other assets

     4,265         4,265         283         1,917         2,065   

Mortgage servicing rights

     1,070         1,077               1,077   

Financial derivatives

                

Designated as hedging instruments under GAAP

     1,872         1,872            1,872        

Not designated as hedging instruments under GAAP

     6,696         6,696         5         6,585         106   

Total Assets

   $ 267,464       $ 270,621       $ 9,509       $ 71,873       $ 189,239   

Liabilities

                

Demand, savings and money market deposits

   $ 187,051       $ 187,051          $ 187,051        

Time deposits

     26,091         26,347            26,347        

Borrowed funds

     40,907         42,329       $ 731         40,505       $ 1,093   

Financial derivatives

                

Designated as hedging instruments under GAAP

     152         152            152        

Not designated as hedging instruments under GAAP

     6,458         6,458         1         6,081         376   

Unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit

     231         231                           231   

Total Liabilities

   $ 260,890       $ 262,568       $ 732       $ 260,136       $ 1,700   

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    129


Table of Contents

The aggregate fair value of financial instruments in Table 96: Additional Fair Value Information Related to Financial Instruments does not represent the total market value of PNC’s assets and liabilities as the table excludes the following:

   

real and personal property,

   

lease financing,

   

loan customer relationships,

   

deposit customer intangibles,

   

retail branch networks,

   

fee-based businesses, such as asset management and brokerage, and

   

trademarks and brand names.

For more information regarding the fair value amounts for financial instruments and their classifications within the fair value hierarchy, see Note 9 Fair Value in our Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of our 2012 Form 10-K.

The aggregate carrying value of our investments that are carried at cost and FHLB and FRB stock was $1.6 billion at June 30, 2013 and $1.7 billion at December 31, 2012, which approximates fair value at each date.

NOTE 10 GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Changes in goodwill by business segment during the first six months of 2013 follow:

Table 97: Changes in Goodwill by Business Segment (a)

 

In millions    Retail
Banking
     Corporate &
Institutional
Banking
     Asset
Management
Group
     Total  

December 31, 2012

   $ 5,794       $ 3,214       $ 64       $ 9,072   

Other

     2         1                  3   

June 30, 2013

   $ 5,796       $ 3,215       $ 64       $ 9,075   
(a) The Residential Mortgage Banking and Non-Strategic Assets Portfolio business segments do not have any goodwill allocated to them as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

Assets and liabilities of acquired entities are recorded at estimated fair value as of the acquisition date.

The gross carrying amount, accumulated amortization and net carrying amount of other intangible assets by major category consisted of the following:

Table 98: Other Intangible Assets

 

In millions    June 30
2013
    December 31
2012
 

Customer-related and other intangibles

      

Gross carrying amount

   $ 1,676      $ 1,676   

Accumulated amortization

     (1,024     (950

Net carrying amount

   $ 652      $ 726   

Mortgage and other loan servicing rights

      

Gross carrying amount

   $ 2,456      $ 2,071   

Valuation allowance

     (103     (176

Accumulated amortization

     (852     (824

Net carrying amount (a)

   $ 1,501      $ 1,071   

Total

   $ 2,153      $ 1,797   
(a) Included mortgage servicing rights for other loan portfolios of $1 million at both June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Our other intangible assets have finite lives and are amortized primarily on a straight-line basis. Core deposit intangibles are amortized on an accelerated basis.

For customer-related and other intangibles, the estimated remaining useful lives range from 1 year to 11 years, with a weighted-average remaining useful life of 8 years.

 

 

130    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

Amortization expense on existing intangible assets follows:

Table 99: Amortization Expense on Existing Intangible Assets (a)

 

In millions  

Six months ended June 30, 2013

   $ 128   

Six months ended June 30, 2012

     169   

Remainder of 2013

     115   

2014

     202   

2015

     179   

2016

     161   

2017

     140   

2018

     123   
(a) Amortization expense included amortization of mortgage servicing rights for other loan portfolios of less than $0.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013. The amount for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $1 million.

Changes in customer-related intangible assets during the first six months of 2013 follow:

Table 100: Summary of Changes in Customer-Related Other Intangible Assets

 

In millions    Customer-
Related
 

December 31, 2012

   $ 726   

Amortization

     (74

June 30, 2013

   $ 652   

Changes in commercial mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) follow:

Table 101: Commercial Mortgage Servicing Rights

 

In millions    2013      2012  

Commercial Mortgage Servicing Rights – Net Carrying Amount

       

January 1

   $ 420       $ 468   

Additions (a)

     86         25   

Amortization expense (b)

     (54      (86

Change in valuation allowance

     73         (9

June 30

   $ 525       $ 398   

Commercial Mortgage Servicing Rights – Valuation Allowance

          

January 1

   $ (176    $ (197

Provision

     (4      (44

Recoveries

     76         11   

Other (b)

     1         24   

June 30

   $ (103    $ (206
(a) Additions for the first six months of 2013 included $31 million from loans sold with servicing retained and $55 million from purchases of servicing rights from third parties. Comparably, additions for the first six months of 2012 included $18 million from loans sold with servicing retained and $7 million from purchases of servicing rights from third parties.
(b) Includes a direct write-down of servicing rights of $24 million for the first six months of 2012.

We recognize as an other intangible asset the right to service mortgage loans for others. Commercial MSRs are purchased or originated when loans are sold with servicing retained. Commercial MSRs are initially recorded at fair value. These rights are subsequently accounted for at the lower of amortized cost or fair value, and are substantially amortized in proportion to and over the period of estimated net servicing income of 5 to 10 years.

Commercial MSRs are periodically evaluated for impairment. For purposes of impairment, the commercial MSRs are stratified based on asset type, which characterizes the predominant risk of the underlying financial asset. If the carrying amount of any individual stratum exceeds its fair value, a valuation reserve is established with a corresponding charge to Corporate services on our Consolidated Income Statement.

The fair value of commercial MSRs is estimated by using a discounted cash flow model incorporating inputs for assumptions as to constant prepayment rates, discount rates and other factors determined based on current market conditions and expectations.

Changes in the residential MSRs follow:

Table 102: Residential Mortgage Servicing Rights

 

In millions    2013     2012  

January 1

   $ 650      $ 647   

Additions:

      

From loans sold with servicing retained

     80        53   

RBC Bank (USA) acquisition

       16   

Purchases

     64        48   

Changes in fair value due to:

      

Time and payoffs (a)

     (105     (77

Other (b)

     286        (106

June 30

   $ 975      $ 581   

Unpaid principal balance of loans serviced for others at June 30

   $ 115,740      $ 116,011   
(a) Represents decrease in MSR value due to passage of time, including the impact from both regularly scheduled loan principal payments and loans that were paid down or paid off during the period.
(b) Represents MSR value changes resulting primarily from market-driven changes in interest rates.

We recognize mortgage servicing right assets on residential real estate loans when we retain the obligation to service these loans upon sale and the servicing fee is more than adequate compensation. MSRs are subject to declines in value principally from actual or expected prepayment of the underlying loans and also defaults. We manage this risk by economically hedging the fair value of MSRs with securities and derivative instruments which are expected to increase (or decrease) in value when the value of MSRs declines (or increases).

 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    131


Table of Contents

The fair value of residential MSRs is estimated by using a cash flow valuation model which calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows, taking into consideration actual and expected mortgage loan prepayment rates, discount rates, servicing costs, and other economic factors which are determined based on current market conditions.

The fair value of commercial and residential MSRs and significant inputs to the valuation models as of June 30, 2013 are shown in the tables below. The expected and actual rates of mortgage loan prepayments are significant factors driving the fair value. Management uses internal proprietary models to estimate future commercial mortgage loan prepayments and a third party model to estimate future residential mortgage loan prepayments. These models have been refined based on current market conditions and management judgment. Future interest rates are another important factor in the valuation of MSRs. Management utilizes market implied forward interest rates to estimate the future direction of mortgage and discount rates. The forward rates utilized are derived from the current yield curve for U.S. dollar interest rate swaps and are consistent with pricing of capital markets instruments. Changes in the shape and slope of the forward curve in future periods may result in volatility in the fair value estimate.

A sensitivity analysis of the hypothetical effect on the fair value of MSRs to adverse changes in key assumptions is presented below. These sensitivities do not include the impact of the related hedging activities. Changes in fair value generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in the assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, the effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of the MSRs is calculated independently without changing any other assumption. In reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another (for example, changes in mortgage interest rates, which drive changes in prepayment rate estimates, could result in changes in the interest rate spread), which could either magnify or counteract the sensitivities.

The following tables set forth the fair value of commercial and residential MSRs and the sensitivity analysis of the hypothetical effect on the fair value of MSRs to immediate adverse changes of 10% and 20% in those assumptions:

Table 103: Commercial Mortgage Loan Servicing Rights – Key Valuation Assumptions

 

Dollars in millions    June 30
2013
     December 31
2012
 

Fair Value

   $ 530       $ 427   

Weighted-average life (years)

     5.5         5.4   

Weighted-average constant prepayment rate

     6.60      7.63

Decline in fair value from 10% adverse change

   $ 10       $ 8   

Decline in fair value from 20% adverse change

   $ 19       $ 16   

Effective discount rate

     7.06      7.70

Decline in fair value from 10% adverse change

   $ 13       $ 12   

Decline in fair value from 20% adverse change

   $ 27       $ 23   

Table 104: Residential Mortgage Loan Servicing Rights – Key Valuation Assumptions

 

Dollars in millions    June 30
2013
     December 31
2012
 

Fair value

   $ 975       $ 650   

Weighted-average life (years)

     6.9         4.3   

Weighted-average constant prepayment rate

     10.13      18.78

Decline in fair value from 10% adverse change

   $ 38       $ 45   

Decline in fair value from 20% adverse change

   $ 74       $ 85   

Weighted-average option adjusted spread

     10.96      11.15

Decline in fair value from 10% adverse change

   $ 42       $ 26   

Decline in fair value from 20% adverse change

   $ 80       $ 49   

Fees from mortgage and other loan servicing comprised of contractually specified servicing fees, late fees and ancillary fees follows:

Table 105: Fees from Mortgage and Other Loan Servicing

 

In millions    2013      2012  

Six months ended June 30

   $ 274       $ 276   

Three months ended June 30

     137         138   

We also generate servicing fees from fee-based activities provided to others for which we do not have an associated servicing asset.

Fees from commercial MSRs, residential MSRs and other loan servicing are reported on our Consolidated Income Statement in the line items Corporate services, Residential mortgage, and Consumer services, respectively.

 

 

132    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

NOTE 11 CAPITAL SECURITIES OF SUBSIDIARY TRUSTS AND PERPETUAL TRUST SECURITIES

CAPITAL SECURITIES OF SUBSIDIARY TRUSTS

Our capital securities of subsidiary trusts (“Trusts”) are described in Note 14 Capital Securities of Subsidiary Trusts and Perpetual Trust Securities in our 2012 Form 10-K. All of these Trusts are wholly owned finance subsidiaries of PNC. In the event of certain changes or amendments to regulatory requirements or federal tax rules, the capital securities are redeemable. The financial statements of the Trusts are not included in PNC’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP.

The obligations of the respective parent of each Trust, when taken collectively, are the equivalent of a full and unconditional guarantee of the obligations of such Trust under the terms of the capital securities. Such guarantee is subordinate in right of payment in the same manner as other junior subordinated debt. There are certain restrictions on PNC’s overall ability to obtain funds from its subsidiaries. For additional disclosure on these funding restrictions, including an explanation of dividend and intercompany loan limitations, see Note 22 Regulatory Matters in our 2012 Form 10-K.

On April 23, 2013, we redeemed the $15 million of trust preferred securities issued by the Yardville Capital Trust VI. On May 23, 2013, we redeemed $30 million of trust preferred securities issued by Fidelity Capital Trust III. On June 17, 2013 we redeemed the following trust preferred securities:

   

$15 million issued by Sterling Financial Statutory Trust III,

   

$15 million issued by Sterling Financial Statutory Trust IV,

   

$20 million issued by Sterling Financial Statutory Trust V,

   

$30 million issued by MAF Bancorp Capital Trust I, and

   

$8 million issued by James Monroe Statutory Trust III.

See Note 20 Subsequent Events for additional information on the redemption of $22 million on July 23, 2013 and a planned redemption of $35 million on September 16, 2013 of trust preferred securities.

PNC is also subject to restrictions on dividends and other provisions potentially imposed under the Exchange Agreement with PNC Preferred Funding Trust II, as described in Note 14 in our 2012 Form 10-K in the Perpetual Trust Securities section, and to other provisions similar to or in some ways more restrictive than those potentially imposed under that agreement.

PERPETUAL TRUST SECURITIES

Our perpetual trust securities are described in Note 14 in our 2012 Form 10-K. Our 2012 Form 10-K also includes additional information regarding the PNC Preferred Funding Trust I and Trust II Securities, including descriptions of replacement capital and dividend restriction covenants. Prior to their redemption, the PNC Preferred Funding Trust III Securities included dividend restriction covenants similar to those described for the PNC Preferred Funding Trust II Securities.

On March 15, 2013, we redeemed $375 million of Fixed-To-Floating Non-cumulative Exchangeable Perpetual Trust Securities (REIT Preferred Securities) issued by PNC Preferred Funding Trust III with a current distribution rate of 8.7%.

 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    133


Table of Contents

NOTE 12 CERTAIN EMPLOYEE BENEFIT AND STOCK BASED COMPENSATION PLANS

PENSION AND POSTRETIREMENT PLANS

As described in Note 15 Employee Benefit Plans in our 2012 Form 10-K, we have a noncontributory, qualified defined benefit pension plan covering eligible employees. Benefits are determined using a cash balance formula where earnings credits are a percentage of eligible compensation. Pension contributions are based on an actuarially determined amount necessary to fund total benefits payable to plan participants.

We also maintain nonqualified supplemental retirement plans for certain employees and provide certain health care and life insurance benefits for qualifying retired employees (postretirement benefits) through various plans. The nonqualified pension and postretirement benefit plans are unfunded. The Company reserves the right to terminate plans or make plan changes at any time.

The components of our net periodic pension and post-retirement benefit cost for the first six months of 2013 and 2012, respectively, were as follows:

Table 106: Net Periodic Pension and Postretirement Benefits Costs

 

     Qualified Pension Plan     Nonqualified Retirement Plans      Postretirement Benefits  

Three months ended June 30

In millions

   2013     2012     2013      2012      2013     2012  

Net periodic cost consists of:

                    

Service cost

   $ 29      $ 25      $ 1       $ 1       $ 2      $ 2   

Interest cost

     43        48        3         4         4        4   

Expected return on plan assets

     (72     (71              

Amortization of prior service credit

     (2     (2             (1     (1

Amortization of actuarial losses/(gains)

     21        22        2         1                 (1

Net periodic cost/(benefit)

   $ 19      $ 22      $ 6       $ 6       $ 5      $ 4   

 

     Qualified Pension Plan     Nonqualified Retirement Plans      Postretirement Benefits  

Six months ended June 30

In millions

       2013      2012     2013      2012      2013     2012  

Net periodic cost consists of:

                     

Service cost

   $ 57       $ 51      $ 2       $ 2       $ 3      $ 3   

Interest cost

     85         96        6         7         8        8   

Expected return on plan assets

     (144      (142              

Amortization of prior service credit

     (4      (4             (2     (2

Amortization of actuarial losses

     43         44        4         3                    

Net periodic cost/(benefit)

   $ 37       $ 45      $ 12       $ 12       $ 9      $ 9   

STOCK BASED COMPENSATION PLANS

As more fully described in Note 16 Stock Based Compensation Plans in our 2012 Form 10-K, we have long-term incentive award plans (Incentive Plans) that provide for the granting of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, incentive shares/performance units, restricted stock, restricted share units, other share-based awards and dollar-denominated awards to executives and, other than incentive stock options, to non-employee directors. Certain Incentive Plan awards may be paid in stock, cash or a combination of stock and cash. We typically grant a substantial portion of our stock-based compensation awards during the first quarter of the year. As of June 30, 2013, no stock appreciation rights were outstanding.

Total compensation expense recognized related to all share-based payment arrangements during the first six months of 2013 and 2012 was $84 million and $56 million, respectively.

 

 

134    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTIONS

Options are granted at exercise prices not less than the market value of common stock on the grant date. Generally, options become exercisable in installments after the grant date. No option may be exercisable after 10 years from its grant date. Payment of the option exercise price may be in cash or by surrendering shares of common stock at market value on the exercise date. The exercise price may be paid in previously owned shares.

For purposes of computing stock option expense, we estimated the fair value of stock options primarily by using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Option pricing models

require the use of numerous assumptions, many of which are very subjective. The option pricing assumptions used by PNC are as follows:

Table 107: Option Pricing Assumptions

 

Weighted-average for the six months ended

June 30

   2013     2012  

Risk-free interest rate

     .9     1.1

Dividend yield

     2.5        2.3   

Volatility

     34.0        35.1   

Expected life

     6.5 yrs.        5.9 yrs.   

Grant-date fair value

   $ 16.35      $ 16.22   
 

 

The following table represents the stock option activity for the first six months of 2013.

Table 108: Stock Option Rollforward

 

     PNC     

PNC Options

Converted From

National City

Options

     Total  
In thousands, except weighted-average data    Shares     Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
     Shares      Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
     Shares      Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
 

Outstanding at December 31, 2012

     14,817      $ 55.52         747       $ 681.16         15,564       $ 85.55   

Granted

     161        63.87                 161         63.87   

Exercised

     (2,492     44.84                 (2,492      44.84   

Cancelled

     (475     57.64         (19      462.07         (494      73.25   

Outstanding at June 30, 2013

     12,011      $ 57.76         728       $ 686.89         12,739       $ 93.72   

Exercisable at June 30, 2013

     10,253      $ 56.84         728       $ 686.89         10,981       $ 98.61   

 

During the first six months of 2013, we issued approximately 2 million shares from treasury stock in connection with stock option exercise activity. As with past exercise activity, we currently intend to utilize treasury stock primarily for any future stock option exercises.

INCENTIVE/PERFORMANCE UNIT SHARE AWARDS AND RESTRICTED STOCK/SHARE UNIT AWARDS

The fair value of nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/share unit awards is initially determined based on prices not less than the market value of our common stock on the date of grant. The value of certain incentive/performance unit share awards is subsequently remeasured based on the achievement of one or more financial and other performance goals generally over a three-year period. The Personnel and Compensation Committee (“P&CC”) of the Board of Directors approves the final award payout with respect to incentive/performance unit share awards. Restricted stock/share unit awards have various vesting periods generally ranging from 36 months to 60 months.

Beginning in 2013, we incorporated several enhanced risk-related performance changes to certain long-term incentive compensation programs. In addition to achieving certain financial performance metrics on both an absolute basis and relative to our peers, final payout amounts will be subject to a negative adjustment if PNC fails to meet certain risk-related performance metrics as specified in the award agreement. However, the P&CC has the discretion to reduce any or all of this negative adjustment under certain circumstances. These awards have either a three-year or a four-year performance period and are payable in either stock or a combination of stock and cash.

Additionally, performance-based restricted share units were granted in 2013 to certain executives as part of annual bonus deferral criteria. These units, payable solely in stock, vest ratably over a four-year period and contain the same risk-related discretionary criteria noted in the paragraph above.

 

 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    135


Table of Contents

In the following table, the unit shares and related weighted-average grant date fair value of the incentive/performance awards exclude the effect of dividends on the underlying shares, as those dividends will be paid in cash.

Table 109: Nonvested Incentive/Performance Unit Share Awards and Restricted Stock/Share Unit Awards – Rollforward

 

Shares in thousands   Nonvested
Incentive/
Performance
Unit Shares
    Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
    Nonvested
Restricted
Stock/
Share
Units
    Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 

December 31, 2012

    1,119      $ 61.14        3,061      $ 60.04   

Granted

    885        63.86        1,123        63.49   

Vested/Released

    (326     58.26        (611     55.07   

Forfeited

    (20     59.36        (125     61.76   

June 30, 2013

    1,658      $ 63.18        3,448      $ 61.98   

At June 30, 2013, there was $179 million of unamortized share-based compensation expense related to nonvested equity compensation arrangements granted under the Incentive Plans. This unamortized cost is expected to be recognized as expense over a period of no longer than five years.

LIABILITY AWARDS

We granted cash-payable restricted share units to certain executives. The grants were made primarily as part of an annual bonus incentive deferral plan. While there are time-based and other vesting criteria, there are no market or performance criteria associated with these awards. Compensation expense recognized related to these awards was recorded in prior periods as part of annual cash bonus criteria. As of June 30, 2013, there were 829,615 of these cash-payable restricted share units outstanding.

A summary of all nonvested, cash-payable restricted share unit activity follows:

Table 110: Nonvested Cash-Payable Restricted Share Units – Rollforward

 

In thousands    Nonvested
Cash-Payable
Restricted
Share Units
     Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 

Outstanding at December 31, 2012

     920        

Granted

     485        

Vested and Released

     (457     

Forfeited

     (2     

Outstanding at June 30, 2013

     946       $ 68,944   

NOTE 13 FINANCIAL DERIVATIVES

We use derivative financial instruments (derivatives) primarily to help manage exposure to interest rate, market and credit risk and reduce the effects that changes in interest rates may have on net income, fair value of assets and liabilities, and cash flows. We also enter into derivatives with customers to facilitate their risk management activities.

Derivatives represent contracts between parties that usually require little or no initial net investment and result in one party delivering cash or another type of asset to the other party based on a notional amount and an underlying as specified in the contract. Derivative transactions are often measured in terms of notional amount, but this amount is generally not exchanged and it is not recorded on the balance sheet. The notional amount is the basis to which the underlying is applied to determine required payments under the derivative contract. The underlying is a referenced interest rate (commonly LIBOR), security price, credit spread or other index. Residential and commercial real estate loan commitments associated with loans to be sold also qualify as derivative instruments.

All derivatives are carried on our Consolidated Balance Sheet at fair value. Derivative balances are presented on the Consolidated Balance Sheet on a net basis taking into consideration the effects of legally enforceable master netting agreements and any related cash collateral exchanged with counterparties. Further discussion regarding the rights of setoff associated with these legally enforceable master netting agreements is included in the Offsetting, Counterparty Credit Risk, and Contingent Features section below.

Further discussion on how derivatives are accounted for is included in Note 1 Accounting Policies in our 2012 Form 10-K.

DERIVATIVES DESIGNATED IN HEDGE RELATIONSHIPS

Certain derivatives used to manage interest rate risk as part of our asset and liability risk management activities are designated as accounting hedges under GAAP. Derivatives hedging the risks associated with changes in the fair value of assets or liabilities are considered fair value hedges, derivatives hedging the variability of expected future cash flows are considered cash flow hedges, and derivatives hedging a net investment in a foreign subsidiary are considered net investment hedges. Designating derivatives as accounting hedges allows for gains and losses on those derivatives, to the extent effective, to be recognized in the income statement in the same period the hedged items affect earnings.

FAIR VALUE HEDGES

We enter into receive-fixed, pay-variable interest rate swaps to hedge changes in the fair value of outstanding fixed-rate debt

 

 

136    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

and borrowings caused by fluctuations in market interest rates. The specific products hedged may include bank notes, Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings, and senior and subordinated debt. We also enter into pay-fixed, receive-variable interest rate swaps and zero-coupon swaps to hedge changes in the fair value of fixed rate and zero-coupon investment securities caused by fluctuations in market interest rates. The specific products hedged include U.S. Treasury, government agency and other debt securities. For these hedge relationships, we use statistical regression analysis to assess hedge effectiveness at both the inception of the hedge relationship and on an ongoing basis. There were no components of derivative gains or losses excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness.

The ineffective portion of the change in value of our fair value hedge derivatives resulted in net losses of $13 million for the first six months of 2013 compared with net losses of $25 million for the first six months of 2012.

CASH FLOW HEDGES

We enter into receive-fixed, pay-variable interest rate swaps to modify the interest rate characteristics of designated commercial loans from variable to fixed in order to reduce the impact of changes in future cash flows due to market interest rate changes. For these cash flow hedges, any changes in the fair value of the derivatives that are effective in offsetting changes in the forecasted interest cash flows are recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income and are reclassified to interest income in conjunction with the recognition of interest received on the loans. In the 12 months that follow June 30, 2013, we expect to reclassify from the amount currently reported in Accumulated other comprehensive income, net derivative gains of $222 million pretax, or $144 million after-tax, in association with interest received on the hedged loans. This amount could differ from amounts actually recognized due to changes in interest rates, hedge de-designations, and the addition of other hedges subsequent to June 30, 2013. The maximum length of time over which forecasted loan cash flows are hedged is 7 years. We use statistical regression analysis to assess the effectiveness of these hedge relationships at both the inception of the hedge relationship and on an ongoing basis.

We also periodically enter into forward purchase and sale contracts to hedge the variability of the consideration that will be paid or received related to the purchase or sale of investment securities. The forecasted purchase or sale is consummated upon gross settlement of the forward contract itself. As a result, hedge ineffectiveness, if any, is typically minimal. Gains and losses on these forward contracts are recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income and are recognized in earnings when the hedged cash flows affect earnings. In the 12 months that follow June 30, 2013, we expect to reclassify from the amount currently reported in Accumulated other comprehensive income, net derivative gains of $34 million pretax, or $22 million after-tax, as

adjustments of yield on investment securities. The maximum length of time we are hedging forecasted purchases is four months. With respect to forecasted sale of securities, there were no amounts in Accumulated other comprehensive income at June 30, 2013.

There were no components of derivative gains or losses excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness related to either cash flow hedge strategy.

During the first six months of 2013 and 2012, there were no gains or losses from cash flow hedge derivatives reclassified to earnings because it became probable that the original forecasted transaction would not occur. The amount of cash flow hedge ineffectiveness recognized in income for the first six months of 2013 and 2012 was not material to PNC’s results of operations.

NET INVESTMENT HEDGES

We enter into foreign currency forward contracts to hedge non-U.S. Dollar (USD) net investments in foreign subsidiaries against adverse changes in foreign exchange rates. We assess whether the hedging relationship is highly effective in achieving offsetting changes in the value of the hedge and hedged item by qualitatively verifying that the critical terms of the hedge and hedged item match at the inception of the hedging relationship and on an ongoing basis. There were no components of derivative gains or losses excluded from the assessment of the hedge effectiveness.

For the first six months of 2013 and 2012, there was no net investment hedge ineffectiveness.

Further detail regarding the notional amounts, fair values and gains and losses recognized related to derivatives used in fair value, cash flow, and net investment hedge strategies is presented in the following derivative tables: Tables 111: Derivatives Total Notional or Contractual Amounts and Fair Values, 113: Derivatives Designated in GAAP Hedge Relationships – Fair Value Hedges, 114: Derivatives Designated in GAAP Hedge Relationships – Cash Flow Hedges, and 115: Derivatives Designated in GAAP Hedge Relationships – Net Investment Hedges.

DERIVATIVES NOT DESIGNATED IN HEDGE RELATIONSHIPS

We also enter into derivatives that are not designated as accounting hedges under GAAP.

The majority of these derivatives are used to manage risk related to residential and commercial mortgage banking activities and are considered economic hedges. Although these derivatives are used to hedge risk, they are not designated as accounting hedges because the contracts they are hedging are typically also carried at fair value on the balance sheet, resulting in symmetrical accounting treatment for both the hedging instrument and the hedged item.

 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    137


Table of Contents

Our residential mortgage banking activities consist of originating, selling and servicing mortgage loans. Residential mortgage loans that will be sold in the secondary market, and the related loan commitments, which are considered derivatives, are accounted for at fair value. Changes in the fair value of the loans and commitments due to interest rate risk are hedged with forward contracts to sell mortgage-backed securities, as well as U.S. Treasury and Eurodollar futures and options. Gains and losses on the loans and commitments held for sale and the derivatives used to economically hedge them are included in Residential mortgage noninterest income on the Consolidated Income Statement.

We typically retain the servicing rights related to residential mortgage loans that we sell. Residential mortgage servicing rights are accounted for at fair value with changes in fair value influenced primarily by changes in interest rates. Derivatives used to hedge the fair value of residential mortgage servicing rights include interest rate futures, swaps, options (including caps, floors, and swaptions), and forward contracts to purchase mortgage-backed securities. Gains and losses on residential mortgage servicing rights and the related derivatives used for hedging are included in Residential mortgage noninterest income.

Certain commercial mortgage loans held for sale are accounted for at fair value. These loans, and the related loan commitments, which are considered derivatives, are accounted for at fair value. In addition we originate loans for sale into the secondary market that are carried at the lower of cost or fair value. Derivatives used to economically hedge these loans and commitments from changes in fair value due to interest rate risk and credit risk include forward loan sale contracts, interest rate swaps, and credit default swaps. Gains and losses on the commitments, loans and derivatives are included in Other noninterest income. Derivatives used to economically hedge the change in value of commercial mortgage servicing rights include interest rate swaps and futures. Gains or losses on these derivatives are included in Corporate services noninterest income.

The residential and commercial mortgage loan commitments associated with loans to be sold which are accounted for as derivatives are valued based on the estimated fair value of the underlying loan and the probability that the loan will fund within the terms of the commitment. The fair value also takes into account the fair value of the embedded servicing right.

We offer derivatives to our customers in connection with their risk management needs. These derivatives primarily consist of interest rate swaps, interest rate caps, floors, swaptions and foreign exchange contracts. We primarily manage our market

risk exposure from customer transactions by entering into a variety of hedging transactions with third-party dealers. Gains and losses on customer-related derivatives are included in Other noninterest income.

The derivatives portfolio also includes derivatives used for other risk management activities. These derivatives are entered into based on stated risk management objectives and include credit default swaps (CDSs) used to mitigate the risk of economic loss on a portion of our loan exposure. We enter into credit default swaps under which we buy loss protection from or sell loss protection to a counterparty for the occurrence of a credit event related to a referenced entity or index. There were no credit default swaps sold as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. The fair values of these derivatives typically are based on related credit spreads. Gains and losses on the derivatives entered into for other risk management are included in Other noninterest income. CDSs are included in the following derivative tables: Tables 111: Derivatives Total Notional or Contractual Amounts and Fair Values, 117: Credit Default Swaps, 118: Credit Ratings of Credit Default Swaps and 119: Referenced/Underlying Assets of Credit Default Swaps.

We also periodically enter into risk participation agreements to share some of the credit exposure with other counterparties related to interest rate derivative contracts or to take on credit exposure to generate revenue. We will make/receive payments under these agreements if a customer defaults on its obligation to perform under certain derivative swap contracts. Risk participation agreements are included in the following derivative tables: Tables 111: Derivatives Total Notional or Contractual Amounts and Fair Values, 116: Gains (Losses) on Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments under GAAP, 120: Risk Participation Agreements Sold and 121: Internal Credit Ratings of Risk Participation Agreements Sold.

Included in the customer, mortgage banking risk management, and other risk management portfolios are written interest-rate caps and floors entered into with customers and for risk management purposes. We receive an upfront premium from the counterparty and are obligated to make payments to the counterparty if the underlying market interest rate rises above or falls below a certain level designated in the contract. Our ultimate obligation under written options is based on future market conditions and is only quantifiable at settlement.

Further detail regarding the derivatives not designated in hedging relationships is presented in the following derivative tables: Tables 111: Derivatives Total Notional or Contractual Amounts and Fair Values and 116: Gains (Losses) on Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments under GAAP.

 

 

138    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

Table 111: Derivatives Total Notional or Contractual Amounts and Fair Values

 

     June 30, 2013      December 31, 2012  
In millions    Notional/
Contract
Amount
     Asset
Fair
Value (a)
     Liability
Fair
Value (b)
     Notional/
Contract
Amount
     Asset
Fair
Value (a)
     Liability
Fair
Value (b)
 

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under GAAP

                   

Interest rate contracts:

                   

Cash flow hedges:

                   

Receive fixed swaps (c)

   $ 13,799       $ 307       $ 69       $ 13,428       $ 504        

Forward purchase commitments

     3,480         9         38         250         1            

Subtotal

   $ 17,279       $ 316       $ 107       $ 13,678       $ 505        

Fair value hedges:

                   

Receive fixed swaps (c)

   $ 13,856       $ 990       $ 153       $ 12,394       $ 1,365        

Pay fixed swaps (c) (d)

     1,874         26         69         2,319         2       $ 144   

Subtotal

   $ 15,730       $ 1,016       $ 222       $ 14,713       $ 1,367       $ 144   

Foreign exchange contracts:

                   

Net investment hedge

     848         48                  879                  8   

Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments

   $ 33,857       $ 1,380       $ 329       $ 29,270       $ 1,872       $ 152   

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under GAAP

                   

Derivatives used for residential mortgage banking activities:

                   

Residential mortgage servicing

                   

Interest rate contracts:

                   

Swaps

   $ 61,792       $ 1,629       $ 1,290       $ 59,607       $ 2,204       $ 1,790   

Swaptions

     6,417         33         24         5,890         209         119   

Futures (e)

     46,276               49,816           

Future options

     25,750         25         5         34,350         5         2   

Mortgage-backed securities commitments

     4,467         17         50         3,429         3         1   

Subtotal

   $ 144,702       $ 1,704       $ 1,369       $ 153,092       $ 2,421       $ 1,912   

Loan sales

                   

Interest rate contracts:

                   

Futures (e)

   $ 485             $ 702           

Bond options

     400       $ 10            900       $ 3        

Mortgage-backed securities commitments

     11,279         232       $ 89         8,033         5       $ 14   

Residential mortgage loan commitments

     3,738         11         22         4,092         85            

Subtotal

   $ 15,902       $ 253       $ 111       $ 13,727       $ 93       $ 14   

Subtotal

   $ 160,604       $ 1,957       $ 1,480       $ 166,819       $ 2,514       $ 1,926   

Derivatives used for commercial mortgage banking activities

                   

Interest rate contracts:

                   

Swaps

   $ 1,054       $ 22       $ 49       $ 1,222       $ 56       $ 84   

Swaptions

     1,050         5         4              

Futures (e)

     1,279               2,030           

Future options

     5,200         2         7              

Commercial mortgage loan commitments

     1,313         37         24         1,259         12         9   

Subtotal

   $ 9,896       $ 66       $ 84       $ 4,511       $ 68       $ 93   

Credit contracts:

                   

Credit default swaps

     95         2                  95         2            

Subtotal

   $ 9,991       $ 68       $ 84       $ 4,606       $ 70       $ 93   

Derivatives used for customer-related activities:

                   

Interest rate contracts:

                   

Swaps

   $ 126,963       $ 2,862       $ 2,848       $ 127,567       $ 3,869       $ 3,917   

Caps/floors – Sold

     4,920            7         4,588            1   

Caps/floors – Purchased

     4,716         22            4,187         21        

Swaptions

     2,889         61         60         2,285         82         35   

Futures (e)

     5,344               9,113           

Mortgage-backed securities commitments

     2,689         24         22         1,736         2         2   

Subtotal

   $ 147,521       $ 2,969       $ 2,937       $ 149,476       $ 3,974       $ 3,955   

Foreign exchange contracts

     12,645         209         164         10,737         126         112   

Equity contracts

              105         1         3   

Credit contracts:

                   

Risk participation agreements

     3,769         1         4         3,530         5         6   

Subtotal

   $ 163,935       $ 3,179       $ 3,105       $ 163,848       $ 4,106       $ 4,076   

Derivatives used for other risk management activities:

                   

Interest rate contracts:

                   

Swaps

   $ 552             $ 601       $ 4        

Futures (e)

     155               274           

Residential mortgage loan commitments

     600       $ 1       $ 1                              

Subtotal

   $ 1,307       $ 1       $ 1       $ 875       $ 4        

Foreign exchange contracts

     13               17          $ 3   

Equity contracts

              8         2         2   

Credit contracts:

                   

Credit default swaps

              15           

Other contracts (f)

     941                  331         898                  358   

Subtotal

   $ 2,261       $ 1       $ 332       $ 1,813       $ 6       $ 363   

Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments

   $ 336,791       $ 5,205       $ 5,001       $ 337,086       $ 6,696       $ 6,458   

Total Gross Derivatives

   $ 370,648       $ 6,585       $ 5,330       $ 366,356       $ 8,568       $ 6,610   

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    139


Table of Contents
(a) Included in Other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(b) Included in Other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(c) The floating rate portion of interest rate contracts is based on money-market indices. As a percent of notional amount, 48% were based on 1-month LIBOR and 52% on 3-month LIBOR at June 30, 2013 compared with 51% and 49%, respectively, at December 31, 2012.
(d) Includes zero-coupon swaps.
(e) Futures contracts settle in cash daily and therefore, no derivative asset or liability is recognized on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(f) Includes PNC’s obligation to fund a portion of certain BlackRock LTIP programs and the swaps entered into in connection with sales of a portion of Visa Class B common shares in the second quarter of 2013 and second half of 2012. Refer to Note 9 Fair Value for additional information on the Visa swaps.

 

OFFSETTING, COUNTERPARTY CREDIT RISK, AND CONTINGENT FEATURES

We utilize a net presentation on the Consolidated Balance Sheet for those derivative financial instruments entered into with counterparties under legally enforceable master netting agreements. The master netting agreements reduce credit risk by permitting the closeout netting of various types of derivative instruments with the same counterparty upon the occurrence of an event of default. The master netting agreement also may require the exchange of cash or marketable securities to collateralize either party’s net position. In certain cases, minimum thresholds must be exceeded before any collateral is exchanged. Collateral is typically exchanged daily based on the net fair value of the positions with the counterparty as of the preceding day. Any cash collateral exchanged with counterparties under these master netting agreements is also netted against the applicable derivative fair values on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. However, the fair value of any securities held or pledged is not included in the net presentation on the balance sheet. In order for an arrangement to be eligible for netting under GAAP (ASC 210-20), we must obtain the requisite assurance that the offsetting rights included in the master netting

agreement would be legally enforceable in the event of bankruptcy, insolvency, or a similar proceeding of such third party. Enforceability is evidenced by obtaining a legal opinion that supports, with sufficient confidence, the enforceability of the master netting agreement in bankruptcy.

The following derivative Table 112: Derivative Assets and Liabilities Offsetting shows the impact legally enforceable master netting agreements had on our derivative assets and derivative liabilities as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. The table also includes the fair value of any securities collateral held or pledged under legally enforceable master netting agreements. Cash and securities collateral amounts are included in the table only to the extent of the related net derivative fair values.

For further discussion on ASU 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities and the impact of other instruments entered into under master netting arrangements, see Note 1 under Recent Accounting Pronouncements in the March 31, 2013 Form 10-Q. Refer to Note 18 Commitments and Guarantees for additional information related to resale and repurchase agreements offsetting.

 

 

Table 112: Derivative Assets and Liabilities Offsetting

 

June 30, 2013

In millions

  

Gross
Fair Value

Derivative
Assets

     Amounts Offset on the
Consolidated Balance Sheet    
    

Net
Fair Value

Derivative
Assets

   

Securities
Collateral
Held Under

Master Netting
Agreements

     Net
Amounts
 
      Fair Value
Offset Amount
     Cash
Collateral
         

Derivative assets

                                                    

Interest rate contracts

   $ 6,325       $ 3,534       $ 635       $ 2,156      $ 233       $ 1,923   

Foreign exchange contracts

     257         146         23         88           88   

Credit contracts

     3         3                                      

Total derivative assets

   $ 6,585       $ 3,683       $ 658       $ 2,244  (a)    $ 233       $ 2,011   

 

June 30, 2013

In millions

  

Gross Fair
Value

Derivative
Liabilities

    

Amounts Offset on the

Consolidated Balance Sheet    

    

Net
Fair Value

Derivative
Liabilities

   

Securities
Collateral
Pledged Under

Master Netting
Agreements

    

Net
Amounts

 
      Fair Value
Offset Amount
     Cash
Collateral
         

Derivative liabilities

                                                    

Interest rate contracts

   $ 4,831       $ 3,625       $ 573       $ 633      $         –       $ 633   

Foreign exchange contracts

     164         55         9         100           100   

Credit contracts

     4         3            1           1   

Other contracts

     331                           331                 331   

Total derivative liabilities

   $ 5,330       $ 3,683       $ 582       $ 1,065  (b)    $       $ 1,065   

 

140    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

December 31, 2012

In millions

  

Gross Fair
Value

Derivative
Assets

    

Amounts Offset on the

Consolidated Balance Sheet    

    

Net
Fair Value

Derivative
Assets

   

Securities
Collateral
Held Under

Master Netting
Agreements

     Net
Amounts
 
      Fair Value
Offset Amount
     Cash
Collateral
         

Derivative assets

                                                    

Interest rate contracts

   $ 8,432       $ 5,041       $ 1,024       $ 2,367      $ 135       $ 2,232   

Foreign exchange contracts

     126         61         7         58           58   

Equity contracts

     3         3                

Credit contracts

     7         2                  5                 5   

Total derivative assets

   $ 8,568       $ 5,107       $ 1,031       $ 2,430  (a)    $ 135       $ 2,295   

 

December 31, 2012

In millions

  

Gross Fair
Value

Derivative
Liabilities

     Amounts Offset on the
Consolidated Balance Sheet    
    

Net
Fair Value

Derivative
Liabilities

   

Securities
Collateral
Pledged Under

Master Netting
Agreements

     Net
Amounts
 
      Fair Value
Offset Amount
     Cash
Collateral
         

Derivative liabilities

                                                    

Interest rate contracts

   $ 6,118       $ 5,060       $ 908       $ 150      $ 18       $ 132   

Foreign exchange contracts

     123         47         6         70           70   

Equity contracts

     5               5           5   

Credit contracts

     6               6           6   

Other contracts

     358                           358                 358   

Total derivative liabilities

   $ 6,610       $ 5,107       $ 914       $ 589  (b)    $ 18       $ 571   
(a) Represents the net amount of derivative assets included in Other Assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(b) Represents the net amount of derivative liabilities included in Other Liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

 

In addition to using master netting and related collateral agreements to reduce credit risk associated with derivative instruments, we also seek to minimize credit risk by entering into transactions with counterparties with high credit ratings and by using internal credit approvals, limits, and monitoring procedures. Collateral may also be exchanged under certain derivative agreements that are not considered master netting agreements.

At June 30, 2013, we held cash, U.S. government securities and mortgage-backed securities totaling $1.0 billion under master netting and other collateral agreements to collateralize net derivative assets due from counterparties, and we have pledged cash, U.S. government securities and agency mortgage-backed securities totaling $618 million under these agreements to collateralize net derivative liabilities owed to counterparties. These totals may differ from the amounts presented in the preceding offsetting table because they may include collateral exchanged under an agreement that does not qualify as a master netting agreement or because the total amount of collateral held or pledged exceeds the net derivative fair value with the counterparty as of the balance sheet date due to timing or other factors. To the extent not netted against the derivative fair value under a master netting agreement, the receivable for cash pledged is included in Other assets and the obligation for cash held is included in Other borrowed funds on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. Securities held from counterparties are not recognized on our balance sheet. Likewise securities we have pledged to counterparties remain on our balance sheet.

Certain of the master netting agreements and certain other derivative agreements also contain provisions that require PNC’s debt to maintain an investment grade credit rating from each of the major credit rating agencies. If PNC’s debt ratings were to fall below investment grade, we would be in violation of these provisions and the counterparties to the derivative instruments could request immediate payment or demand immediate and ongoing full overnight collateralization on derivative instruments in net liability positions. The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a net liability position on June 30, 2013 was $837 million for which PNC had posted collateral of $617 million in the normal course of business. The maximum amount of collateral PNC would have been required to post if the credit-risk-related contingent features underlying these agreements had been triggered on June 30, 2013, would be an additional $220 million.

Our exposure related to risk participations where we sold protection is discussed in the Credit Derivatives section below.

Any nonperformance risk, including credit risk, is included in the determination of the estimated net fair value of the derivatives.

GAINS (LOSSES) ON DERIVATIVES

The following tables provide the gains (losses) on derivatives designated as hedging instruments and not designated as hedging instruments under GAAP.

 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    141


Table of Contents

Gains (losses) on derivative instruments and related hedged items follow:

Table 113: Derivatives Designated in GAAP Hedge Relationships – Fair Value Hedges

 

Six months ended

In millions

            June 30, 2013     June 30, 2012  
            Gain
(Loss) on
Derivatives
Recognized
in Income
    Gain (Loss)
on Related
Hedged
Items
Recognized
in Income
    Gain
(Loss) on
Derivatives
Recognized
in Income
    Gain (Loss)
on Related
Hedged
Items
Recognized
in Income
 
   Hedged Items    Location   Amount     Amount     Amount     Amount  

Interest rate contracts

   U.S. Treasury and
Government Agencies
Securities
   Investment securities

(interest income)

  $ 63      $ (66   $ (29   $ 26   

Interest rate contracts

   Other Debt Securities    Investment securities

(interest income)

    5        (5     (2     2   

Interest rate contracts

   Subordinated debt    Borrowed funds

(interest expense)

    (263     256        8        (24

Interest rate contracts

   Bank notes and senior debt    Borrowed funds

(interest expense)

    (271     268        74        (80

Total

            $ (466   $ 453      $ 51      $ (76

 

Three months ended

In millions

            June 30, 2013     June 30, 2012  
            Gain
(Loss) on
Derivatives
Recognized
in Income
    Gain (Loss)
on Related
Hedged
Items
Recognized
in Income
    Gain
(Loss) on
Derivatives
Recognized
in Income
    Gain (Loss)
on Related
Hedged
Items
Recognized
in Income
 
   Hedged Items    Location   Amount     Amount     Amount     Amount  

Interest rate contracts

   U.S. Treasury and

Government Agencies
Securities

   Investment securities

(interest income)

  $ 41      $ (43   $ (48   $ 50   

Interest rate contracts

   Other Debt Securities    Investment securities
(interest income)
    3        (3     (2     2   

Interest rate contracts

   Subordinated debt    Borrowed funds
(interest expense)
    (195     190        44        (50

Interest rate contracts

   Bank notes and senior debt    Borrowed funds
(interest expense)
    (206     204        127        (128

Total

            $ (357   $ 348      $ 121      $ (126

Table 114: Derivatives Designated in GAAP Hedge Relationships – Cash Flow Hedges

 

Six months ended
In millions
         Gain (Loss) on Derivatives
Recognized in OCI
(Effective Portion)
    Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated
OCI into Income
(Effective Portion)
     Gain (Loss)  Recognized in Income on
Derivatives
(Ineffective Portion)
            Amount     Location    Amount      Location    Amount (a)

June 30, 2013

   Interest rate contracts    $ (179   Interest income    $ 186       Interest income     
        Noninterest income      23           

June 30, 2012

   Interest rate contracts    $ 207      Interest income    $ 232       Interest income     
                  Noninterest income      59             

 

Three months ended
In millions
         Gain (Loss) on Derivatives
Recognized in OCI
(Effective Portion)
    Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated
OCI into Income
(Effective Portion)
     Gain (Loss)  Recognized in Income on
Derivatives
(Ineffective Portion)
            Amount     Location    Amount      Location    Amount (a)

June 30, 2013

  

Interest rate contracts

   $ (193   Interest income    $ 80       Interest income     
        Noninterest income      8           

June 30, 2012

   Interest rate contracts    $ 154      Interest income    $ 116       Interest income     
                  Noninterest income      32             
(a) The amount of cash flow hedge ineffectiveness recognized in income was not material for the periods presented.

 

142    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

Table 115: Derivatives Designated in GAAP Hedge Relationships – Net Investment Hedges

 

Six months ended

In millions

         Gain (Loss) on Derivatives
Recognized in OCI
(Effective Portion)
 

June 30, 2013

   Foreign exchange contracts    $ 56   

June 30, 2012

   Foreign exchange contracts        

 

Three months ended
In millions
         Gain (Loss) on Derivatives
Recognized in OCI
(Effective Portion)
 

June 30, 2013

   Foreign exchange contracts    $ (1

June 30, 2012

   Foreign exchange contracts      12   

Table 116: Gains (Losses) on Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments under GAAP

 

     Three months
ended June 30
    Six months
ended June 30
 
In millions    2013     2012     2013     2012  

Derivatives used for residential mortgage banking activities:

          

Residential mortgage servicing

          

Interest rate contracts

   $ (172   $ 123      $ (211   $ 206   

Loan sales

          

Interest rate contracts

     142        14        176        36   

Gains (losses) included in residential mortgage banking activities (a)

   $ (30   $ 137      $ (35   $ 242   

Derivatives used for commercial mortgage banking activities:

          

Interest rate contracts (b) (c)

   $ 1      $ 19      $ 7      $ 21   

Credit contracts (c)

                     (1     (1

Gains (losses) from commercial mortgage banking activities

   $ 1      $ 19      $ 6      $ 20   

Derivatives used for customer-related activities:

          

Interest rate contracts

   $ 67      $ (9   $ 86      $ 27   

Foreign exchange contracts

     (2     39        21        56   

Equity contracts

       (3     (3     (5

Credit contracts

     (2     (1     (3     (2

Gains (losses) from customer-related activities (c)

   $ 63      $ 26      $ 101      $ 76   

Derivatives used for other risk management activities:

          

Interest rate contracts

   $ 4      $ (8   $ 4      $ (7

Foreign exchange contracts

     2        (1     2        (1

Credit contracts

           (1

Other contracts (d)

     (18     44        (77     (10

Gains (losses) from other risk management activities (c)

   $ (12   $ 35      $ (71   $ (19

Total gains (losses) from derivatives not designated as hedging instruments

   $ 22      $ 217      $ 1      $ 319   
(a) Included in Residential mortgage noninterest income.
(b) Included in Corporate services noninterest income.
(c) Included in Other noninterest income.
(d) Includes BlackRock LTIP, a forward purchase commitment for certain loans upon conversion from a variable rate to a fixed rate, and the swap entered into in connection with the sale of a portion of Visa Class B common shares.

CREDIT DERIVATIVES

The credit derivative underlying is based on the credit risk of a specific entity, entities, or an index. As discussed above, we enter into credit derivatives, specifically credit default swaps and risk participation agreements, as part of our commercial mortgage banking hedging activities and for customer and other risk management purposes. Detail regarding credit default swaps and risk participations sold follows.

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    143


Table of Contents

Table 117: Credit Default Swaps (a)

 

     June 30, 2013      December 31, 2012  
Dollars in millions    Notional
Amount
     Fair
Value
     Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Maturity
In Years
     Notional
Amount
     Fair
Value
     Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Maturity
In Years
 

Credit Default Swaps – Purchased

                   

Single name

   $ 35            7.8       $ 50            5.8   

Index traded

     60       $ 2         35.7         60       $ 2         36.1   

Total

   $ 95       $ 2         25.4       $ 110       $ 2         22.4   
(a) There were no credit default swaps sold as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

 

The notional amount of these credit default swaps by credit rating follows:

Table 118: Credit Ratings of Credit Default Swaps (a)

 

Dollars in millions    June 30
2013
     December 31
2012
 

Credit Default Swaps – Purchased

       

Investment grade (b)

   $ 95       $ 95   

Subinvestment grade (c)

              15   

Total

   $ 95       $ 110   
(a) There were no credit default swaps sold as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
(b) Investment grade with a rating of BBB-/Baa3 or above based on published rating agency information.
(c) Subinvestment grade with a rating below BBB-/Baa3 based on published rating agency information.

The referenced/underlying assets for these credit default swaps follow:

Table 119: Referenced/Underlying Assets of Credit Default Swaps

 

      Corporate
Debt
    Commercial
mortgage-backed
securities
    Loans  

June 30, 2013

     37     63     0

December 31, 2012

     32     54     14

RISK PARTICIPATION AGREEMENTS

We have sold risk participation agreements with terms ranging from less than 1 year to 24 years. We will be required to make payments under these agreements if a customer defaults on its obligation to perform under certain derivative swap contracts with third parties.

Table 120: Risk Participation Agreements Sold

 

Dollars in millions    Notional
Amount
     Fair Value     Weighted-Average
Remaining  Maturity
In Years
 

June 30, 2013

   $ 2,240       $ (4     6.3   

December 31, 2012

   $ 2,053       $ (6     6.6   

Based on our internal risk rating process of the underlying third parties to the swap contracts, the percentages of the exposure amount of risk participation agreements sold by internal credit rating follow:

Table 121: Internal Credit Ratings of Risk Participation Agreements Sold

 

      June 30, 2013     December 31, 2012  

Pass (a)

     98     99

Below pass (b)

     2     1
(a) Indicates the expected risk of default is currently low.
(b) Indicates a higher degree of risk of default.

Assuming all underlying swap counterparties defaulted at June 30, 2013, the exposure from these agreements would be $76 million based on the fair value of the underlying swaps, compared with $143 million at December 31, 2012.

 

 

144    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

NOTE 14 EARNINGS PER SHARE

Table 122: Basic and Diluted Earnings per Common Share

 

     Three months
ended June 30
     Six months
ended June 30
 
In millions, except per share data    2013      2012      2013      2012  

Basic

           

Net income

   $ 1,123       $ 546       $ 2,127       $ 1,357   

Less:

           

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

     1         (5      (8      1   

Preferred stock dividends and discount accretion

     53         25         128         64   

Dividends and undistributed earnings allocated to nonvested restricted shares

     5         1         9         5   

Net income attributable to basic common shares

   $ 1,064       $ 525       $ 1,998       $ 1,287   

Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding

     528         527         527         526   

Basic earnings per common share (a)

   $ 2.02       $ 1.00       $ 3.79       $ 2.44   

Diluted

           

Net income attributable to basic common shares

   $ 1,064       $ 525       $ 1,998       $ 1,287   

Less: Impact of BlackRock earnings per share dilution

     4         4         9         7   

Net income attributable to diluted common shares

   $ 1,060       $ 521       $ 1,989       $ 1,280   

Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding

     528         527         527         526   

Dilutive potential common shares (b) (c)

     3         3         3         3   

Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding

     531         530         530         529   

Diluted earnings per common share (a)

   $ 1.99       $ .98       $ 3.76       $ 2.42   
(a) Basic and diluted earnings per share under the two-class method are determined on net income reported on the income statement less earnings allocated to nonvested restricted shares (participating securities).
(b) Excludes number of stock options considered to be anti-dilutive of 1 million and 5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012, respectively, and 1 million and 5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012, respectively.
(c) Excludes number of warrants considered to be anti-dilutive of 17 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, and 17 million for the six months ended both June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012. No warrants were considered to be anti-dilutive for the three months ended June 30, 2013.

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    145


Table of Contents

NOTE 15 TOTAL EQUITY AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Activity in total equity for the first six months of 2012 and 2013 follows.

Table 123: Rollforward of Total Equity

 

           Shareholders’ Equity                
In millions   Shares
Outstanding
Common
Stock
    Common
Stock
    Capital
Surplus –
Preferred
Stock
    Capital
Surplus –
Common
Stock
and Other
    Retained
Earnings
   

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income

(Loss)

    Treasury
Stock
    Non-
controlling
Interests
    Total
Equity
 

Balance at January 1, 2012

    527      $ 2,683      $ 1,637      $ 12,072      $ 18,253      $ (105   $ (487   $ 3,193      $ 37,246   

Net income

              1,356              1        1,357   

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

                507              507   

Cash dividends declared

                       

Common ($.75 per share)

              (396             (396

Preferred

              (63             (63

Preferred stock discount accretion

          1          (1            

Common stock activity (a)

        4          26                  30   

Treasury stock activity

    2            46            36          82   

Preferred stock issuance – Series P (b)

          1,482                    1,482   

Other

                            (46                             15        (31

Balance at June 30, 2012 (c)

    529      $ 2,687      $ 3,120      $ 12,098      $ 19,149      $ 402      $ (451   $ 3,209      $ 40,214   

Balance at January 1, 2013

    528      $ 2,690      $ 3,590      $ 12,193      $ 20,265      $ 834      $ (569   $ 2,762      $ 41,765   

Net income

              2,135              (8     2,127   

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

                (789           (789

Cash dividends declared

                       

Common ($.84 per share)

              (444             (444

Preferred

              (118             (118

Preferred stock discount accretion

          3          (3            

Redemption of noncontrolling interests (d)

              (7           (368     (375

Common stock activity

    1        3          32                  35   

Treasury stock activity

    2            (42         116          74   

Preferred stock redemption – Series L (e)

          (150                 (150

Preferred stock issuance – Series R (f)

          496                    496   

Other (g)

                            51                                (731     (680

Balance at June 30, 2013 (c)

    531      $ 2,693      $ 3,939      $ 12,234      $ 21,828      $ 45      $ (453   $ 1,655      $ 41,941   
(a) Common stock activity totaled less than .5 million shares issued.
(b) 15,000 Series P preferred shares with a $1 par value were issued on April 24, 2012.
(c) The par value of our preferred stock outstanding was less than $.5 million at each date and, therefore, is excluded from this presentation.
(d) Relates to the redemption of REIT preferred securities in the first quarter of 2013. See Note 11 Capital Securities of Subsidiary Trusts and Perpetual Trust Securities for additional information.
(e) 1,500 Series L preferred shares with a $1 par value were redeemed on April 19, 2013.
(f) 5,000 Series R preferred shares with a $1 par value were issued on May 7, 2013.
(g) Includes deconsolidation of low income housing tax credit investments in the amount of $675 million as of June 30, 2013. See Note 3 Loan Sale and Servicing Activities and Variable Interest Entities for additional information.

 

146    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

Table 124: Other Comprehensive Income

Details of other comprehensive income (loss) are as follows:

 

In millions    Pretax     Tax      After-tax  

Net unrealized gains (losses) on non-OTTI securities

         

Balance at March 31, 2012

   $ 1,336      $ (490    $ 846   

Second Quarter 2012 activity

         

Increase in net unrealized gains (losses) on non-OTTI securities

     200        (74      126   

Less: Net gains (losses) realized as a yield adjustment reclassified to investment securities in interest income

     12        (5      7   

Less: Net gains (losses) realized on sales of securities reclassified to noninterest income

     30        (11      19   

Net unrealized gains (losses) on non-OTTI securities

     158        (58      100   

Balance at June 30, 2012

     1,494        (548      946   

Balance at March 31, 2013

     1,688        (619      1,069   

Second Quarter 2013 activity

         

Increase in net unrealized gains (losses) on non-OTTI securities

     (729     264         (465

Less: Net gains (losses) realized as a yield adjustment reclassified to investment securities in interest income

     11        (4      7   

Less: Net gains (losses) realized on sales of securities reclassified to noninterest income

     53        (19      34   

Net unrealized gains (losses) on non-OTTI securities

     (793     287         (506

Balance at June 30, 2013

   $ 895      $ (332    $ 563   

Net unrealized gains (losses) on OTTI securities

         

Balance at March 31, 2012

   $ (760   $ 279       $ (481

Second Quarter 2012 activity

         

Increase in net unrealized gains (losses) on OTTI securities

     (26     10         (16

Less: OTTI losses realized on securities reclassified to noninterest income

     (34     13         (21

Net unrealized gains (losses) on OTTI securities

     8        (3      5   

Balance at June 30, 2012

     (752     276         (476

Balance at March 31, 2013

     (54     21         (33

Second Quarter 2013 activity

         

Increase in net unrealized gains (losses) on OTTI securities

     (49     17         (32

Less: OTTI losses realized on securities reclassified to noninterest income

     (4     1         (3

Net unrealized gains (losses) on OTTI securities

     (45     16         (29

Balance at June 30, 2013

   $ (99   $ 37       $ (62

Net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedge derivatives

         

Balance at March 31, 2012

   $ 1,041      $ (381    $ 660   

Second Quarter 2012 activity

         

Increase in net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedge derivatives

     154        (57      97   

Less: Net gains (losses) realized as a yield adjustment reclassified to loan interest income (a)

     101        (37      64   

Less: Net gains (losses) realized as a yield adjustment reclassified to investment securities interest income (a)

     15        (6      9   

Less: Net gains (losses) realized on sales of securities reclassified to noninterest income (a)

     32        (12      20   

Net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedge derivatives

     6        (2      4   

Balance at June 30, 2012

     1,047        (383      664   

Balance at March 31, 2013

     804        (294      510   

Second Quarter 2013 activity

         

Increase in net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedge derivatives

     (193     71         (122

Less: Net gains (losses) realized as a yield adjustment reclassified to loan interest income (a)

     66        (24      42   

Less: Net gains (losses) realized as a yield adjustment reclassified to investment securities interest income (a)

     14        (5      9   

Less: Net gains (losses) realized on sales of securities reclassified to noninterest income (a)

     8        (3      5   

Net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedge derivatives

     (281     103         (178

Balance at June 30, 2013

   $ 523      $ (191    $ 332   

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    147


Table of Contents
In millions    Pretax     Tax      After-tax  

Pension and other postretirement benefit plan adjustments

         

Balance at March 31, 2012

   $ (1,143   $ 419       $ (724

Second Quarter 2012 activity

         

Net pension and other postretirement benefit plan activity

     18        (7      11   

Amortization of actuarial loss (gain) reclassified to other noninterest expense

     24        (9      15   

Amortization of prior service cost (credit) reclassified to other noninterest expense

     (3     1         (2

Total First Quarter 2012 activity

     39        (15      24   

Balance at June 30, 2012

     (1,104     404         (700

Balance at March 31, 2013

     (1,180     432         (748

Second Quarter 2013 activity

         

Net pension and other postretirement benefit plan activity

     (14     5         (9

Amortization of actuarial loss (gain) reclassified to other noninterest expense

     24        (9      15   

Amortization of prior service cost (credit) reclassified to other noninterest expense

     (3     1         (2

Total Second Quarter 2013 activity

     7        (3      4   

Balance at June 30, 2013

   $ (1,173   $ 429       $ (744

Other

         

Balance at March 31, 2012

   $ (39   $ 19       $ (20

Second Quarter 2012 Activity

         

BlackRock gains (losses)

     (27     17         (10

Net investment hedge derivatives (b)

     12        (4      8   

Foreign currency translation adjustments

     (15     5         (10

Total Second Quarter 2012 activity

     (30     18         (12

Balance at June 30, 2012

     (69     37         (32

Balance at March 31, 2013

     (47     16         (31

Second Quarter 2013 Activity

         

BlackRock gains (losses)

     (7     (6      (13

Net investment hedge derivatives (b)

     (1        (1

Foreign currency translation adjustments

     1                 1   

Total Second Quarter 2013 activity

     (7     (6      (13

Balance at June 30, 2013

   $ (54   $ 10       $ (44
(a) Cash flow hedge derivatives are interest rate contract derivatives designated as hedging instruments under GAAP.
(b) Net investment hedge derivatives are foreign exchange contracts designated as hedging instruments under GAAP.

 

148    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents
In millions    Pretax     Tax      After-tax  

Net unrealized gains (losses) on non-OTTI securities

         

Balance at December 31, 2011

   $ 1,098      $ (402    $ 696   

2012 activity

         

Increase in net unrealized gains (losses) on non-OTTI securities

     481        (177      304   

Less: Net gains (losses) realized as a yield adjustment reclassified to investment securities in interest income

     19        (7      12   

Less: Net gains (losses) realized on sale of securities reclassified to noninterest income

     66        (24      42   

Net unrealized gains (losses) on non-OTTI securities

     396        (146      250   

Balance at June 30, 2012

     1,494        (548      946   

Balance at December 31, 2012

     1,858        (681      1,177   

2013 activity

         

Increase in net unrealized gains (losses) on non-OTTI securities

     (886     321         (565

Less: Net gains (losses) realized as a yield adjustment reclassified to investment securities in interest income

     25        (9      16   

Less: Net gains (losses) realized on sale of securities reclassified to noninterest income

     52        (19      33   

Net unrealized gains (losses) on non-OTTI securities

     (963     349         (614

Balance at June 30, 2013

   $ 895      $ (332    $ 563   

Net unrealized gains (losses) on OTTI securities

         

Balance at December 31, 2011

   $ (1,166   $ 428       $ (738

2012 activity

         

Increase in net unrealized gains (losses) on OTTI securities

     336        (123      213   

Less: Net gains (losses) realized on sales of securities reclassified to noninterest income

     (6     2         (4

Less: OTTI losses realized on securities reclassified to noninterest income

     (72     27         (45

Net unrealized gains (losses) on OTTI securities

     414        (152      262   

Balance at June 30, 2012

     (752     276         (476

Balance at December 31, 2012

     (195     72         (123

2013 activity

         

Increase in net unrealized gains (losses) on OTTI securities

     82        (30      52   

Less: OTTI losses realized on securities reclassified to noninterest income

     (14     5         (9

Net unrealized gains (losses) on OTTI securities

     96        (35      61   

Balance at June 30, 2013

   $ (99   $ 37       $ (62

Net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedge derivatives

         

Balance at December 31, 2011

   $ 1,131      $ (414    $ 717   

2012 activity

         

Increase in net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedge derivatives

     207        (76      131   

Less: Net gains (losses) realized as a yield adjustment reclassified to loan interest income (a)

     201        (74      127   

Less: Net gains (losses) realized as a yield adjustment reclassified to investment securities interest income (a)

     31        (11      20   

Less: Net gains (losses) realized on sales of securities reclassified to noninterest income (a)

     59        (22      37   

Net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedge derivatives

     (84     31         (53

Balance at June 30, 2012

     1,047        (383      664   

Balance at December 31, 2012

     911        (333      578   

2013 activity

         

Increase in net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedge derivatives

     (179     66         (113

Less: Net gains (losses) realized as a yield adjustment reclassified to loan interest income (a)

     153        (56      97   

Less: Net gains (losses) realized as a yield adjustment reclassified to investment securities interest income (a)

     33        (12      21   

Less: Net gains (losses) realized on sales of securities reclassified to noninterest income (a)

     23        (8      15   

Net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedge derivatives

     (388     142         (246

Balance at June 30, 2013

   $ 523      $ (191    $ 332   

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    149


Table of Contents
In millions    Pretax      Tax      After-tax  

Pension and other postretirement benefit plan adjustments

          

Balance at December 31, 2011

   $ (1,191    $ 436       $ (755

2012 Activity

          

Net pension and other postretirement benefit plan activity

     45         (16      29   

Amortization of actuarial loss (gain) reclassified to other noninterest expense

     48         (18      30   

Amortization of prior service cost (credit) reclassified to other noninterest expense

     (6      2         (4

Total 2012 activity

     87         (32      55   

Balance at June 30, 2012

     (1,104      404         (700

Balance at December 31, 2012

     (1,226      449         (777

2013 Activity

          

Net pension and other postretirement benefit plan activity

     11         (4      7   

Amortization of actuarial loss (gain) reclassified to other noninterest expense

     48         (18      30   

Amortization of prior service cost (credit) reclassified to other noninterest expense

     (6      2         (4

Total 2013 Activity

     53         (20      33   

Balance at June 30, 2013

   $ (1,173    $ 429       $ (744

Other

          

Balance at December 31, 2011

   $ (51    $ 26       $ (25

2012 Activity

          

BlackRock gains (losses)

     (20      12         (8

Foreign currency translation adjustments

     2         (1      1   

Total 2012 activity

     (18      11         (7

Balance at June 30, 2012

     (69      37         (32

Balance at December 31, 2012

     (41      20         (21

2013 Activity

          

BlackRock gains (losses)

     (11      (11      (22

Net investment hedge derivatives (b)

     56         (21      35   

Foreign currency translation adjustments

     (58      22         (36

Total 2013 activity

     (13      (10      (23

Balance at June 30, 2013

   $ (54    $ 10       $ (44
(a) Cash flow hedge derivatives are interest rate contract derivatives designated as hedging instruments under GAAP.
(b) Net investment hedge derivatives are foreign exchange contracts designated as hedging instruments under GAAP.

Table 125: Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Components

 

     June 30, 2013      December 31, 2012  
In millions    Pretax     After-tax      Pretax      After-tax  

Net unrealized gains (losses) on non-OTTI securities

   $ 895      $ 563       $ 1,858       $ 1,177   

Net unrealized gains (losses) on OTTI securities

     (99     (62      (195      (123

Net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedge derivatives

     523        332         911         578   

Pension and other postretirement benefit plan adjustments

     (1,173     (744      (1,226      (777

Other

     (54     (44      (41      (21

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

   $ 92      $ 45       $ 1,307       $ 834   

 

150    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

NOTE 16 INCOME TAXES

The net operating loss carryforwards at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 follow:

Table 126: Net Operating Loss Carryforwards and Tax Credit Carryforwards

 

In millions    June 30
2013
     December 31
2012
 

Net Operating Loss Carryforwards:

       

Federal

   $ 1,157       $ 1,698   

State

     2,371         2,468   

Tax Credit Carryforwards:

       

Federal

   $ 33       $ 29   

State

     4         4   

Valuation Allowance:

       

State

   $ 59       $ 54   

The federal net operating loss carryforwards expire from 2027 to 2032. The state net operating loss carryforwards will expire from 2013 to 2031. The majority of the tax credit carryforwards expire in 2032. All federal and most state net operating loss and credit carryforwards are from acquired entities and utilization is subject to various statutory limitations. It is anticipated that the company will be able to fully utilize its carryforwards for federal tax purposes. A valuation allowance has been recorded against certain state carryforwards as reflected above.

Examinations are substantially completed for PNC’s consolidated federal income tax returns for 2007 and 2008 and there are no outstanding unresolved issues. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is currently examining PNC’s 2009 and 2010 returns. National City’s consolidated federal income tax returns through 2008 have been audited by the IRS. Certain adjustments remain under review by the IRS Appeals Division for years 2003 through 2008.

The Company had unrecognized tax benefits of $109 million at June 30, 2013 and $176 million at December 31, 2012. The decrease results from the company partially resolving certain adjustments relating to legacy National City federal examinations and from resolving various state examinations. At June 30, 2013, $86 million of unrecognized tax benefits, if recognized, would favorably impact the effective income tax rate.

It is reasonably possible that the liability for unrecognized tax benefits could increase or decrease in the next twelve months due to completion of tax authorities’ exams or the expiration of statutes of limitations. Management estimates that the liability for unrecognized tax benefits could decrease by $68 million within the next twelve months.

NOTE 17 LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We establish accruals for legal proceedings, including litigation and regulatory and governmental investigations and inquiries, when information related to the loss contingencies represented by those matters indicates both that a loss is probable and that the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. Any such accruals are adjusted thereafter as appropriate to reflect changed circumstances. When we are able to do so, we also determine estimates of possible losses or ranges of possible losses, whether in excess of any related accrued liability or where there is no accrued liability, for Disclosed Matters. “Disclosed Matters” includes those matters disclosed in this Note 17 and also those matters disclosed in Note 23 Legal Proceedings in Part II, Item 8 of our 2012 Form 10-K and Note 17 Legal Proceedings in Part I, Item 1 of our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 (such prior disclosure referred to as “Prior Disclosure”). For Disclosed Matters where we are able to estimate such possible losses or ranges of possible losses, as of June 30, 2013, we estimate that it is reasonably possible that we could incur losses in an aggregate amount of up to approximately $400 million. The estimates included in this amount are based on our analysis of currently available information and are subject to the application of significant judgment and a variety of assumptions and uncertainties. As new information is obtained, we may change our estimates. Due to the inherent subjectivity of the assessments and unpredictability of outcomes of legal proceedings, any amounts accrued or included in this aggregate amount may not represent the ultimate loss to us from the legal proceedings in question. Thus, our exposure and ultimate losses may be higher, and possibly significantly so, than the amounts accrued or this aggregate amount.

The aggregate estimated amount provided above does not include an estimate for every Disclosed Matter, as we are unable, at this time, to estimate the losses that it is reasonably possible that we could incur or ranges of such losses with respect to some of the matters disclosed for one or more of the following reasons. In our experience, legal proceedings are inherently unpredictable. In many legal proceedings, various factors exacerbate this inherent unpredictability, including, among others, one or more of the following: the proceeding is in its early stages; the damages sought are unspecified, unsupported or uncertain; it is unclear whether a case brought as a class action will be allowed to proceed on that basis or, if permitted to proceed as a class action, how the class will be defined; the plaintiff is seeking relief other than or in addition to compensatory damages; the matter presents meaningful legal uncertainties, including novel issues of law; we have not engaged in meaningful settlement discussions; discovery has not started or is not complete; there are significant facts in dispute; and there are a large number of parties named as defendants (including where it is uncertain how damages or liability, if any, will be shared among multiple defendants). Generally, the less progress that has been made in the

 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    151


Table of Contents

proceedings or the broader the range of potential results, the harder it is for us to estimate losses or ranges of losses that it is reasonably possible we could incur. Therefore, as the estimated aggregate amount disclosed above does not include all of the Disclosed Matters, the amount disclosed above does not represent our maximum reasonably possible loss exposure for all of the Disclosed Matters. The estimated aggregate amount also does not reflect any of our exposure to matters not so disclosed, as discussed below under “Other.”

We include in some of the descriptions of individual Disclosed Matters certain quantitative information related to the plaintiff’s claim against us as alleged in the plaintiff’s pleadings or other public filings or otherwise based on publicly available information. While information of this type may provide insight into the potential magnitude of a matter, it does not necessarily represent our estimate of reasonably possible loss or our judgment as to any currently appropriate accrual.

Some of our exposure in Disclosed Matters may be offset by applicable insurance coverage. We do not consider the possible availability of insurance coverage in determining the amounts of any accruals (although we record the amount of related insurance recoveries that are deemed probable up to the amount of the accrual) or in determining any estimates of possible losses or ranges of possible losses.

The following descriptions update our disclosure of pending legal proceedings provided in our Prior Disclosure.

INTERCHANGE LITIGATION

In the cases that have been consolidated for pretrial proceedings in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York under the caption In re Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant-Discount Antitrust Litigation (Master File No. 1:05-md-1720-JG-JO), the court has scheduled a hearing with respect to final court approval for September 2013. Numerous merchants, including some large national merchants, have objected to or requested exclusion (opted out) from the proposed class settlements, and some of those opting out have filed complaints in the U.S. District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York against Visa, MasterCard and, in some instances, one or more of the other issuing banks.

CBNV MORTGAGE LITIGATION

MDL Proceedings in Pennsylvania. In June 2013, the court in the multidistrict litigation proceeding (MDL) in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania under the caption In re: Community Bank of Northern Virginia Lending Practices Litigation (No. 03-0425 (W.D. Pa.), MDL No. 1674) granted in part and denied in part the motion, dismissing the claims of any plaintiff whose loan did not originate or was not assigned to our predecessor, Community Bank of Northern Virginia (CBNV), narrowing the scope of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) claim,

and dismissing several of the named plaintiffs for lack of standing. The court also dismissed the claims against the other lender defendant on jurisdictional grounds. The limitation of the potential class to CBNV borrowers reduces its size to approximately 22,500. Also in June 2013, the plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification, which was granted in July 2013.

OVERDRAFT LITIGATION

In August 2013, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (the “MDL Court”) granted final approval to the settlement described below of the three pending lawsuits naming PNC Bank that had been consolidated for pre-trial proceedings in the MDL Court (together with one other case naming National City Bank, two cases naming RBC Bank (USA), and similar lawsuits against numerous other banks) under the caption In re Checking Account Overdraft Litigation (MDL No. 2036, Case No. 1:09-MD-02036-JLK ). PNC Bank had reached an agreement to settle these cases for $90 million in June 2012.

The complaints in these three lawsuits alleged that PNC Bank engaged in unlawful practices in assessing overdraft fees arising from electronic point-of-sale and ATM debits. The principal practice challenged in these lawsuits is PNC Bank’s purportedly common policy of posting debit transactions on a daily basis from highest amount to lowest amount, thereby allegedly inflating the number of overdraft fees assessed. Other practices challenged include the failure to decline to honor debit card transactions where the account has insufficient funds to cover the transactions.

In the consolidated amended complaint against PNC Bank in the MDL Court, the plaintiffs asserted claims for breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing; unconscionability; conversion; unjust enrichment; and violation of the consumer protection statutes of Pennsylvania, Illinois and New Jersey.

The cases against PNC Bank in the MDL Court sought to certify multi-state classes of customers for the common law claims described below (covering all states in which PNC Bank had retail branch operations during the class periods), and subclasses of PNC Bank customers with accounts in Pennsylvania and New Jersey branches, with each subclass being asserted for purposes of claims under those states’ consumer protection statutes. No class periods were stated in any of the complaints, other than for the applicable statutes of limitations, which vary by state and claim.

PNC Bank’s motion to dismiss a consolidated amended complaint with respect to the cases pending against it in the MDL Court was denied in March 2011. In December 2011, the plaintiffs in cases pending against PNC Bank in the MDL Court moved for class certification, which was granted in May 2012.

The lawsuits pending against RBC Bank (USA) consolidated in the MDL Court as well as another lawsuit making similar allegations against PNC Bank, as described in Prior Disclosure, remain pending.

 

 

152    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

CAPTIVE MORTGAGE REINSURANCE LITIGATION

In June 2013, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, in White, et al. v. The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., et al. (Civil Action No. 11-7928), dismissed, without prejudice, the amended complaint on statute of limitations grounds. A second amended complaint, in response to the court’s dismissal order, was filed in July 2013. We filed a motion to dismiss the second amended complaint, also in July 2013. The court has not yet ruled on this motion.

RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES INDEMNIFICATION DEMANDS

The parties have settled several of the cases with respect to which we have received indemnification demands. There has not been any determination that the parties seeking indemnification have any liability to the plaintiffs in the other lawsuits and the amount, if any, for which we are responsible in the settled cases has not been determined.

LENDER PLACED INSURANCE LITIGATION

In June 2013, a lawsuit (Lauren v. PNC Bank, N.A., et al., Case No. 2:13-cv-00762-TFM) was filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania against PNC Bank and a provider of property and casualty insurance to PNC for certain residential mortgages. This lawsuit, which was brought as a class action, alleges, with respect to PNC Bank, that it breached alleged contractual (including the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing) and fiduciary duties to residential mortgage borrowers, and, as to Ohio borrowers, violated the Ohio Consumer Sales Practice Act in connection with the administration of PNC Bank’s program for placement of insurance for borrowers who fail to obtain certain insurance coverages required by the terms of their mortgages. The plaintiff alleges, among other things, that defendants placed insurance in unnecessary and excessive amounts and that PNC Bank improperly profited from these arrangements by means of the payment of commissions to PNC Bank and by reinsurance arrangements between PNC Bank and the insurance provider. The plaintiff seeks to certify a nationwide class and an Ohio sub-class (for the Ohio statutory claim) of all persons who, during applicable periods, have or had a residential mortgage loan or line of credit with PNC Bank, and had hazard insurance placed upon the secured property by PNC Bank. The plaintiff seeks, among other things, damages, restitution or disgorgement of profits improperly obtained, injunctive relief, interest, and attorneys’ fees.

PATENT INFRINGEMENT LITIGATION

In June 2013, a lawsuit (Intellectual Ventures I LLC & Intellectual Ventures II LLC v. PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., and PNC Bank NA, Case No. 2:13-cv-00740-AJS) was filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania against PNC and PNC Bank for patent infringement. The plaintiffs allege that multiple systems by which PNC and PNC Bank provide online banking

services and other services via electronic means infringe five patents owned by the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs seek, among other things, a declaration that PNC and PNC Bank are infringing each of the patents, damages for past and future infringement, and attorneys’ fees.

OTHER REGULATORY AND GOVERNMENTAL INQUIRIES

PNC is the subject of investigations, audits and other forms of regulatory and governmental inquiry covering a broad range of issues in our banking, securities and other financial services businesses, in some cases as part of reviews of specified activities at multiple industry participants. Over the last few years, we have experienced an increase in regulatory and governmental investigations, audits and other inquiries. Areas of current regulatory or governmental inquiry with respect to PNC include consumer financial protection, fair lending, mortgage origination and servicing, mortgage-related insurance and reinsurance, sales by third party providers of voluntary identity protection services to PNC customers, municipal finance activities, and participation in government insurance or guarantee programs, some of which are described below and in Prior Disclosure. These inquiries, including those described below and in Prior Disclosure, may lead to administrative, civil or criminal proceedings, and possibly result in remedies including fines, penalties, restitution, or alterations in our business practices, and in additional expenses and collateral costs.

 

   

PNC has received a subpoena from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York seeking information regarding claims for foreclosure expenses that are incurred in connection with the foreclosure of loans insured or guaranteed by FHA, Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. This inquiry is in its early stage, and PNC is cooperating with the investigation.

   

The Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau are jointly investigating whether mortgage loan pricing by National City and PNC had a disparate impact on protected classes. In June 2013, PNC was advised by the CFPB that it had authorized settlement negotiations with PNC, as successor to National City Corporation, and by the Department of Justice that it had authorized the filing of a civil complaint against PNC, also as successor to National City. PNC continues to cooperate with the agencies’ investigation.

Our practice is to cooperate fully with regulatory and governmental investigations, audits and other inquiries, including those described in this Note 17 and in Prior Disclosure.

OTHER

In addition to the proceedings or other matters described above and in Prior Disclosure, PNC and persons to whom we may have indemnification obligations, in the normal course of

 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    153


Table of Contents

business, are subject to various other pending and threatened legal proceedings in which claims for monetary damages and other relief are asserted. We do not anticipate, at the present time, that the ultimate aggregate liability, if any, arising out of such other legal proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our financial position. However, we cannot now determine whether or not any claims asserted against us or others to whom we may have indemnification obligations, whether in the proceedings or other matters described above or otherwise, will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in any future reporting period, which will depend on, among other things, the amount of the loss resulting from the claim and the amount of income otherwise reported for the reporting period.

See Note 18 Commitments and Guarantees for additional information regarding the Visa indemnification and our other obligations to provide indemnification, including to current and former officers, directors, employees and agents of PNC and companies we have acquired.

NOTE 18 COMMITMENTS AND GUARANTEES

EQUITY FUNDING AND OTHER COMMITMENTS

Our unfunded commitments at June 30, 2013 included private equity investments of $171 million.

STANDBY LETTERS OF CREDIT

We issue standby letters of credit and have risk participations in standby letters of credit issued by other financial institutions, in each case to support obligations of our customers to third parties, such as insurance requirements and the facilitation of transactions involving capital markets product execution. Net outstanding standby letters of credit and internal credit ratings were as follows:

Table 127: Net Outstanding Standby Letters of Credit

 

Dollars in billions    June 30
2013
    December 31
2012
 

Net outstanding standby letters of credit (a)

   $ 10.9      $ 11.5   

Internal credit ratings (as a percentage of portfolio):

      

Pass (b)

     96     95

Below pass (c)

     4     5
(a) The amounts above exclude participations in standby letters of credit of $3.2 billion to other financial institutions as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. The amounts above also include $6.8 billion and $7.5 billion which support remarketing programs at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.
(b) Indicates that expected risk of loss is currently low.
(c) Indicates a higher degree of risk of default.

If the customer fails to meet its financial or performance obligation to the third party under the terms of the contract or there is a need to support a remarketing program, then upon the request of the guaranteed party, subject to the terms of the letter of credit, we would be obligated to make payment to them. The standby letters of credit outstanding on June 30, 2013 had terms ranging from less than 1 year to 7 years.

As of June 30, 2013, assets of $2.4 billion secured certain specifically identified standby letters of credit. In addition, a portion of the remaining standby letters of credit issued on behalf of specific customers is also secured by collateral or guarantees that secure the customers’ other obligations to us. The carrying amount of the liability for our obligations related to standby letters of credit and participations in standby letters of credit was $215 million at June 30, 2013.

STANDBY BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENTS AND OTHER LIQUIDITY FACILITIES

We enter into standby bond purchase agreements to support municipal bond obligations. At June 30, 2013, the aggregate of our commitments under these facilities was $556 million. We also enter into certain other liquidity facilities to support individual pools of receivables acquired by commercial paper conduits. At June 30, 2013, our total commitments under these facilities were $145 million.

INDEMNIFICATIONS

We are a party to numerous acquisition or divestiture agreements under which we have purchased or sold, or agreed to purchase or sell, various types of assets. These agreements can cover the purchase or sale of entire businesses, loan portfolios, branch banks, partial interests in companies, or other types of assets.

These agreements generally include indemnification provisions under which we indemnify the third parties to these agreements against a variety of risks to the indemnified parties as a result of the transaction in question. When PNC is the seller, the indemnification provisions will generally also provide the buyer with protection relating to the quality of the assets we are selling and the extent of any liabilities being assumed by the buyer. Due to the nature of these indemnification provisions, we cannot quantify the total potential exposure to us resulting from them.

We provide indemnification in connection with securities offering transactions in which we are involved. When we are the issuer of the securities, we provide indemnification to the underwriters or placement agents analogous to the indemnification provided to the purchasers of businesses from us, as described above. When we are an underwriter or placement agent, we provide a limited indemnification to the issuer related to our actions in connection with the offering and, if there are other underwriters, indemnification to the other underwriters intended to result in an appropriate sharing of the risk of participating in the offering. Due to the nature of these indemnification provisions, we cannot quantify the total potential exposure to us resulting from them.

In the ordinary course of business, we enter into certain types of agreements that include provisions for indemnifying third parties. We also enter into certain types of agreements, including leases, assignments of leases, and subleases, in which we agree to indemnify third parties for acts by our

 

 

154    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

agents, assignees and/or sublessees, and employees. We also enter into contracts for the delivery of technology service in which we indemnify the other party against claims of patent and copyright infringement by third parties. Due to the nature of these indemnification provisions, we cannot calculate our aggregate potential exposure under them.

In the ordinary course of business, we enter into contracts with third parties under which the third parties provide services on behalf of PNC. In many of these contracts, we agree to indemnify the third party service provider under certain circumstances. The terms of the indemnity vary from contract to contract and the amount of the indemnification liability, if any, cannot be determined.

We are a general or limited partner in certain asset management and investment limited partnerships, many of which contain indemnification provisions that would require us to make payments in excess of our remaining unfunded commitments. While in certain of these partnerships the maximum liability to us is limited to the sum of our unfunded commitments and partnership distributions received by us, in the others the indemnification liability is unlimited. As a result, we cannot determine our aggregate potential exposure for these indemnifications.

In some cases, indemnification obligations of the types described above arise under arrangements entered into by predecessor companies for which we become responsible as a result of the acquisition.

Pursuant to their bylaws, PNC and its subsidiaries provide indemnification to directors, officers and, in some cases, employees and agents against certain liabilities incurred as a result of their service on behalf of or at the request of PNC and its subsidiaries. PNC and its subsidiaries also advance on behalf of covered individuals costs incurred in connection with certain claims or proceedings, subject to written undertakings by each such individual to repay all amounts advanced if it is ultimately determined that the individual is not entitled to indemnification. We generally are responsible for similar indemnifications and advancement obligations that companies we acquire had to their officers, directors and sometimes employees and agents at the time of acquisition. We advanced such costs on behalf of several such individuals with respect to pending litigation or investigations during the first six months of 2013. It is not possible for us to determine the aggregate potential exposure resulting from the obligation to provide this indemnity or to advance such costs.

VISA INDEMNIFICATION

Our payment services business issues and acquires credit and debit card transactions through Visa U.S.A. Inc. card association or its affiliates (Visa). Our 2012 Form 10-K has additional information regarding the October 2007 Visa restructuring, our involvement with judgment and loss sharing

agreements with Visa and certain other banks, and the status of pending interchange litigation. This information was updated in Note 23 Legal Proceedings in our 2012 Form 10-K and in Note 17 Legal Proceedings in this Report. Additionally, we continue to have an obligation to indemnify Visa for judgments and settlements for the remaining specified litigation.

RECOURSE AND REPURCHASE OBLIGATIONS

As discussed in Note 3 Loan Sale and Servicing Activities and Variable Interest Entities, PNC has sold commercial mortgage, residential mortgage and home equity loans directly or indirectly through securitization and loan sale transactions in which we have continuing involvement. One form of continuing involvement includes certain recourse and loan repurchase obligations associated with the transferred assets.

COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE LOAN RECOURSE OBLIGATIONS

We originate, close and service certain multi-family commercial mortgage loans which are sold to FNMA under FNMA’s Delegated Underwriting and Servicing (DUS) program. We participated in a similar program with the FHLMC.

Under these programs, we generally assume up to a one-third pari passu risk of loss on unpaid principal balances through a loss share arrangement. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the unpaid principal balance outstanding of loans sold as a participant in these programs was $12.7 billion and $12.8 billion, respectively. The potential maximum exposure under the loss share arrangements was $3.9 billion at both June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

We maintain a reserve for estimated losses based upon our exposure. The reserve for losses under these programs totaled $37 million and $43 million as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, and is included in Other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. The comparable reserve as of June 30, 2012 was $48 million. If payment is required under these programs, we would not have a contractual interest in the collateral underlying the mortgage loans on which losses occurred, although the value of the collateral is taken into account in determining our share of such losses. Our exposure and activity associated with these recourse obligations are reported in the Corporate & Institutional Banking segment.

Table 128: Analysis of Commercial Mortgage Recourse Obligations

 

In millions    2013     2012  

January 1

   $ 43      $ 47   

Reserve adjustments, net

     (6     5   

Losses – loan repurchases and settlements

             (4

June 30

   $ 37      $ 48   
 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    155


Table of Contents

RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE LOAN AND HOME EQUITY REPURCHASE OBLIGATIONS

While residential mortgage loans are sold on a non-recourse basis, we assume certain loan repurchase obligations associated with mortgage loans we have sold to investors. These loan repurchase obligations primarily relate to situations where PNC is alleged to have breached certain origination covenants and representations and warranties made to purchasers of the loans in the respective purchase and sale agreements. For additional information on loan sales see Note 3 Loan Sale and Servicing Activities and Variable Interest Entities. Our historical exposure and activity associated with Agency securitization repurchase obligations has primarily been related to transactions with FNMA and FHLMC, as indemnification and repurchase losses associated with FHA and VA-insured and uninsured loans pooled in GNMA securitizations historically have been minimal. Repurchase obligation activity associated with residential mortgages is reported in the Residential Mortgage Banking segment.

PNC’s repurchase obligations also include certain brokered home equity loans/lines that were sold to a limited number of private investors in the financial services industry by National City prior to our acquisition of National City. PNC is no longer engaged in the brokered home equity lending business, and our exposure under these loan repurchase obligations is limited to repurchases of loans sold in these transactions. Repurchase activity associated with brokered home equity loans/lines is reported in the Non-Strategic Assets Portfolio segment.

 

Indemnification and repurchase liabilities are initially recognized when loans are sold to investors and are subsequently evaluated by management. Initial recognition and subsequent adjustments to the indemnification and repurchase liability for the sold residential mortgage portfolio are recognized in Residential mortgage revenue on the Consolidated Income Statement. Since PNC is no longer engaged in the brokered home equity lending business, only subsequent adjustments are recognized to the home equity loans/lines indemnification and repurchase liability. These adjustments are recognized in Other noninterest income on the Consolidated Income Statement.

Management’s subsequent evaluation of these indemnification and repurchase liabilities is based upon trends in indemnification and repurchase requests, actual loss experience, risks in the underlying serviced loan portfolios, and current economic conditions. As part of its evaluation, management considers estimated loss projections over the life of the subject loan portfolio. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the total indemnification and repurchase liability for estimated losses on indemnification and repurchase claims totaled $547 million and $672 million, respectively, and was included in Other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. An analysis of the changes in this liability during the first six months of 2013 and 2012 follows:

 

 

Table 129: Analysis of Indemnification and Repurchase Liability for Asserted Claims and Unasserted Claims

 

            2013                      2012          
In millions    Residential
Mortgages (a)
    Home Equity
Loans/Lines (b)
     Total      Residential
Mortgages (a)
     Home Equity
Loans/Lines (b)
     Total  

January 1

   $ 614      $ 58       $ 672       $ 83       $ 47       $ 130   

Reserve adjustments, net

     4        (3      1         32         12         44   

RBC Bank (USA) acquisition

             26            26   

Losses – loan repurchases and settlements

     (96     (30      (126      (40      (8      (48

March 31

   $ 522      $ 25       $ 547       $ 101       $ 51       $ 152   

Reserve adjustments, net

     73        1         74         438         15         453   

Losses – loan repurchases and settlements

     (72     (2      (74      (77      (5      (82

June 30

   $ 523      $ 24       $ 547       $ 462       $ 61       $ 523   
(a) Repurchase obligation associated with sold loan portfolios of $114.4 billion and $115.7 billion at June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012, respectively.
(b) Repurchase obligation associated with sold loan portfolios of $3.8 billion and $4.4 billion at June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012, respectively. PNC is no longer engaged in the brokered home equity business, which was acquired with National City.

 

Management believes our indemnification and repurchase liabilities appropriately reflect the estimated probable losses on indemnification and repurchase claims for all loans sold and outstanding as of June 30, 2013 and 2012. In making these estimates, we consider the losses that we expect to incur over the life of the sold loans. While management seeks to obtain all relevant information in estimating the indemnification and repurchase liability, the estimation process is inherently uncertain and imprecise and, accordingly, it is reasonably possible that future

indemnification and repurchase losses could be more or less than our established liability. Factors that could affect our estimate include the volume of valid claims driven by investor strategies and behavior, our ability to successfully negotiate claims with investors, housing prices and other economic conditions. At June 30, 2013, we estimate that it is reasonably possible that we could incur additional losses in excess of our accrued indemnification and repurchase liability of up to approximately $355 million for our portfolio of residential mortgage loans sold. At June 30, 2013, the reasonably

 

 

156    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

possible loss above our accrual for our portfolio of home equity loans/lines sold was not material. This estimate of potential additional losses in excess of our liability is based on assumed higher repurchase claims and lower claim rescissions than our current assumptions.

REINSURANCE AGREEMENTS

We have two wholly-owned captive insurance subsidiaries which provide reinsurance to third-party insurers related to insurance sold to our customers. These subsidiaries enter into various types of reinsurance agreements with third-party insurers where the subsidiary assumes the risk of loss through either an excess of loss or quota share agreement up to 100% reinsurance. In excess of loss agreements, these subsidiaries assume the risk of loss for an excess layer of coverage up to specified limits, once a defined first loss percentage is met. In quota share agreements, the subsidiaries and third-party insurers share the responsibility for payment of all claims.

These subsidiaries provide reinsurance for accidental death & dismemberment, credit life, accident & health, lender placed hazard and borrower and lender paid mortgage insurance with an aggregate maximum exposure up to the specified limits for all reinsurance contracts as follows:

Table 130: Reinsurance Agreements Exposure (a)

 

In millions    June 30
2013
    December 31
2012
 

Accidental Death & Dismemberment

   $ 1,973      $ 2,049   

Credit Life, Accident & Health

     674        795   

Lender Placed Hazard (b)

     2,901        2,774   

Borrower and Lender Paid Mortgage Insurance

     183        228   

Maximum Exposure

   $ 5,731      $ 5,846   

Percentage of reinsurance agreements:

      

Excess of Loss – Mortgage Insurance

     3     3

Quota Share

     97     97

Maximum Exposure to Quota Share Agreements with 100% Reinsurance

   $ 673      $ 794   
(a) Reinsurance agreements exposure balances represent estimates based on availability of financial information from insurance carriers.
(b) Through the purchase of catastrophe reinsurance connected to the Lender Placed Hazard Exposure, should a catastrophic event occur, PNC will benefit from this reinsurance. No credit for the catastrophe reinsurance protection is applied to the aggregate exposure figure.

A rollforward of the reinsurance reserves for probable losses for the first six months of 2013 and 2012 follows:

Table 131: Reinsurance Reserves – Rollforward

 

In millions    2013     2012  

January 1

   $ 61      $ 82   

Paid Losses

     (21     (35

Net Provision

     8        23   

June 30

   $ 48      $ 70   

 

There were no changes to the terms of existing agreements, nor were any new relationships entered into or existing relationships exited.

There is a reasonable possibility that losses could be more than or less than the amount reserved due to ongoing uncertainty in various economic, social and other factors that could impact the frequency and severity of claims covered by these reinsurance agreements. At June 30, 2013, the reasonably possible loss above our accrual was not material.

REPURCHASE AND RESALE AGREEMENTS

We enter into repurchase and resale agreements where we transfer investment securities to/from a third party with the agreement to repurchase/resell those investment securities at a future date for a specified price. Repurchase and resale agreements are treated as collateralized financing transactions for accounting purposes and are generally carried at the amounts at which the securities will be subsequently reacquired or resold, including accrued interest. Our policy is to take possession of securities purchased under agreements to resell. We monitor the market value of securities to be repurchased and resold and additional collateral may be obtained where considered appropriate to protect against credit exposure.

Repurchase and resale agreements are typically entered into with counterparties under industry standard master netting agreements which provide for the right to setoff amounts owed one another with respect to multiple repurchase and resale agreements under such master netting agreement (referred to as netting arrangements) and liquidate the purchased or borrowed securities in the event of counterparty default. In order for an arrangement to be eligible for netting under GAAP (ASC 210-20), we must obtain the requisite assurance that the offsetting rights included in the master netting agreement would be legally enforceable in the event of bankruptcy, insolvency, or a similar proceeding of such third party. Enforceability is evidenced by obtaining a legal opinion that supports, with sufficient confidence, the enforceability of the master netting agreement in bankruptcy.

In accordance with the disclosure requirements of ASU 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, Table 132: Resale and Repurchase Agreements Offsetting shows the amounts owed under resale and repurchase agreements and the securities collateral associated with those agreements where a legal opinion supporting the enforceability of the offsetting rights has been obtained. We do not present resale and repurchase agreements entered into with the same counterparty under a legally enforceable master netting agreement on a net basis on our Consolidated Balance Sheet or within Table 132: Resale and Repurchase Agreements Offsetting. The amounts reported in Table 132 exclude the fair value adjustment on the structured resale agreements of $14 million and $19 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, that we have elected to account for at fair value.

 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    157


Table of Contents

Refer to Note 9 Fair Value for additional information regarding the structured resale agreements at fair value.

For further discussion on ASU 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities and the impact of other instruments entered into under master netting arrangements, see Note 1 under Recent Accounting Pronouncements in the March 31, 2013 Form 10-Q. Refer to Note 13 Financial Derivatives for additional information related to offsetting of financial derivatives.

Table 132: Resale and Repurchase Agreements Offsetting

 

In millions    Gross
Resale
Agreements
     Amounts
Offset on the
Consolidated
Balance Sheet
   Net Resale
Agreements (a) (b)
     Securities Collateral
Held Under Master
Netting Agreements (c)
     Net
Amounts (b)
 

Resale Agreements

                

June 30, 2013

   $ 1,089          $ 1,089       $ 999       $ 90   

December 31, 2012

     975              975         884         91   

 

In millions    Gross
Repurchase
Agreements
     Amounts
Offset on the
Consolidated
Balance Sheet
   Net Repurchase
Agreements (d) (e)
     Securities Collateral
Pledged Under Master
Netting Agreements (c)
     Net
Amounts (e)
 

Repurchase Agreements

                

June 30, 2013

   $ 3,237          $ 3,237       $ 2,355       $ 882   

December 31, 2012

     3,215              3,215         2,168         1,047   
(a) Represents the resale agreement amount included in Federal funds sold and resale agreements on our Consolidated Balance Sheet and the related accrued interest income in the amount of $1 million at both June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, which is included in Other Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(b) These amounts include certain long term resale agreements of $89 million at both June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, which are fully collateralized but do not have the benefits of a netting opinion and therefore might be subject to a stay in insolvency proceedings and therefore are not eligible under ASC 210-20 for netting.
(c) In accordance with the requirements of ASU 2011-11, represents the fair value of securities collateral purchased or sold, up to the amount owed under the agreement, for agreements supported by a legally enforceable master netting agreement.
(d) Represents the repurchase agreement amount included in Federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements on our Consolidated Balance Sheet and the related accrued interest expense in the amount of less than $1 million at both June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, which is included in Other Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(e) These amounts include overnight repurchase agreements of $832 million and $997 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, entered into with municipalities, pension plans, and certain trusts and insurance companies as well as certain long term repurchase agreements of $50 million at both June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, which are fully collateralized but do not have the benefits of a netting opinion and therefore might be subject to a stay in insolvency proceedings and therefore are not eligible under ASC 210-20 for netting.

 

NOTE 19 SEGMENT REPORTING

We have six reportable business segments:

   

Retail Banking

   

Corporate & Institutional Banking

   

Asset Management Group

   

Residential Mortgage Banking

   

BlackRock

   

Non-Strategic Assets Portfolio

Results of individual businesses are presented based on our internal management reporting practices. There is no comprehensive, authoritative body of guidance for management accounting equivalent to GAAP; therefore, the financial results of our individual businesses are not necessarily comparable with similar information for any other company. We periodically refine our internal methodologies as management reporting practices are enhanced. To the extent practicable, retrospective application of new methodologies is made to prior period reportable business segment results and disclosures to create comparability to the current period presentation to reflect any such refinements.

Financial results are presented, to the extent practicable, as if each business operated on a stand-alone basis. Additionally,

we have aggregated the results for corporate support functions within “Other” for financial reporting purposes.

Assets receive a funding charge and liabilities and capital receive a funding credit based on a transfer pricing methodology that incorporates product maturities, duration and other factors. A portion of capital is intended to cover unexpected losses and is assigned to our business segments using our risk-based economic capital model, including consideration of the goodwill and other intangible assets at those business segments, as well as the diversification of risk among the business segments.

We have allocated the allowances for loan and lease losses and for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit based on our assessment of risk in each business segment’s loan portfolio. Key reserve assumptions and estimation processes react to and are influenced by observed changes in loan portfolio performance experience, the financial strength of the borrower, and economic conditions. Key reserve assumptions are periodically updated.

Our allocation of the costs incurred by operations and other shared support areas not directly aligned with the businesses is primarily based on the use of services.

 

 

158    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

Total business segment financial results differ from total consolidated net income. The impact of these differences is reflected in the “Other” category in the business segment tables. “Other” includes residual activities that do not meet the criteria for disclosure as a separate reportable business, such as gains or losses related to BlackRock transactions, integration costs, asset and liability management activities including net securities gains or losses, other-than-temporary impairment of investment securities and certain trading activities, exited businesses, private equity investments, intercompany eliminations, most corporate overhead, tax adjustments that are not allocated to business segments, and differences between business segment performance reporting and financial statement reporting (GAAP), including the presentation of net income attributable to noncontrolling interests as the segments’ results exclude their portion of net income attributable to noncontrolling interests. Assets, revenue and earnings attributable to foreign activities were not material in the periods presented for comparative purposes.

BUSINESS SEGMENT PRODUCTS AND SERVICES

Retail Banking provides deposit, lending, brokerage, investment management and cash management services to consumer and small business customers within our primary geographic markets. Our customers are serviced through our branch network, ATMs, call centers, online banking and mobile channels. The branch network is located primarily in Pennsylvania, Ohio, New Jersey, Michigan, Illinois, Maryland, Indiana, North Carolina, Florida, Kentucky, Washington, D.C., Delaware, Alabama, Virginia, Georgia, Missouri, Wisconsin and South Carolina.

Corporate & Institutional Banking provides lending, treasury management, and capital markets-related products and services to mid-sized corporations, government and not-for-profit entities, and selectively to large corporations. Lending products include secured and unsecured loans, letters of credit and equipment leases. Treasury management services include cash and investment management, receivables management, disbursement services, funds transfer services, information reporting, and global trade services. Capital markets-related products and services include foreign exchange, derivatives, loan syndications, mergers and acquisitions advisory and related services to middle-market companies, our multi-seller conduit, securities underwriting, and securities sales and trading. Corporate & Institutional Banking also provides commercial loan servicing and real estate advisory and technology solutions for the commercial real estate finance industry. Corporate & Institutional Banking provides products and services generally within our primary geographic markets, with certain products and services offered nationally and internationally.

Asset Management Group includes personal wealth management for high net worth and ultra high net worth clients and institutional asset management. Wealth management products and services include investment and retirement planning, customized investment management, private banking, tailored credit solutions, and trust

management and administration for individuals and their families. Institutional asset management provides investment management, custody and retirement administration services. Institutional clients include corporations, unions, municipalities, non-profits, foundations and endowments, primarily located in our geographic footprint.

Residential Mortgage Banking directly originates primarily first lien residential mortgage loans on a nationwide basis with a significant presence within the retail banking footprint, and also originates loans through majority owned affiliates. Mortgage loans represent loans collateralized by one-to-four-family residential real estate. These loans are typically underwritten to government agency and/or third-party standards, and sold, servicing retained, to secondary mortgage conduits of FNMA, FHLMC, Federal Home Loan Banks and third-party investors, or are securitized and issued under the GNMA program. The mortgage servicing operation performs all functions related to servicing mortgage loans, primarily those in first lien position, for various investors and for loans owned by PNC. Certain loan applications are brokered by majority owned affiliates to others.

BlackRock is a leader in investment management, risk management and advisory services for institutional and retail clients worldwide. BlackRock provides diversified investment management services to institutional clients, intermediary and individual investors through various investment vehicles. Investment management services primarily consist of the management of equity, fixed income, multi-asset class, alternative investment and cash management products. BlackRock offers its investment products in a variety of vehicles, including open-end and closed-end mutual funds, iShares® exchange-traded funds (ETFs), collective investment trusts and separate accounts. In addition, BlackRock provides market risk management, financial markets advisory and enterprise investment system services to a broad base of clients. Financial markets advisory services include valuation services relating to illiquid securities, dispositions and workout assignments (including long-term portfolio liquidation assignments), risk management and strategic planning and execution.

We hold an equity investment in BlackRock, which is a key component of our diversified revenue strategy. BlackRock is a publically traded company, and additional information regarding its business is available in its filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). At June 30, 2013, our economic interest in BlackRock was 22%.

PNC received cash dividends from BlackRock of $125 million and $113 million during the first six months of 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Non-Strategic Assets Portfolio includes a consumer portfolio of mainly residential mortgage and brokered home equity loans and a small commercial loan and lease portfolio. We obtained a significant portion of these non-strategic assets through acquisitions of other companies.

 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    159


Table of Contents

Table 133: Results Of Businesses

 

Three months ended June 30

In millions

   Retail
Banking
     Corporate &
Institutional
Banking
   

Asset

Management

Group

   

Residential
Mortgage

Banking

    BlackRock     

Non-Strategic

Assets

Portfolio

    Other     Consolidated  

2013

                    

Income Statement

                    

Net interest income

   $ 1,012       $ 912      $ 70      $ 51         $ 164      $ 49      $ 2,258   

Noninterest income

     542         477        184        177      $ 149         11        266        1,806   

Total revenue

     1,554         1,389        254        228        149         175        315        4,064   

Provision for credit losses (benefit)

     148         (40     1        4           39        5        157   

Depreciation and amortization

     45         32        11        3             86        177   

Other noninterest expense

     1,111         467        184        189                 41        266        2,258   

Income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling interests

     250         930        58        32        149         95        (42     1,472   

Income taxes (benefit)

     92         318        22        12        37         35        (167     349   

Net income

   $ 158       $ 612      $ 36      $ 20      $ 112       $ 60      $ 125      $ 1,123   

Inter-segment revenue

   $ 2       $ 5      $ 3      $ 2      $ 4       $ (3   $ (13        

Average Assets (a)

   $ 74,516       $ 112,207      $ 7,289      $ 10,407      $ 5,982       $ 10,290      $ 81,336      $ 302,027   

2012

                    

Income Statement

                    

Net interest income

   $ 1,114       $ 1,059      $ 75      $ 53         $ 221      $ 4      $ 2,526   

Noninterest income

     437         354        165        (162   $ 111         2        190        1,097   

Total revenue

     1,551         1,413        240        (109     111         223        194        3,623   

Provision for credit losses (benefit)

     165         33        (1     (2        50        11        256   

Depreciation and amortization

     48         34        10        2             83        177   

Other noninterest expense

     1,123         462        171        228                 67        420        2,471   

Income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling interests

     215         884        60        (337     111         106        (320     719   

Income taxes (benefit)

     79         307        22        (124     23         39        (173     173   

Net income (loss)

   $ 136       $ 577      $ 38      $ (213   $ 88       $ 67      $ (147   $ 546   

Inter-segment revenue

            $ 9      $ 3      $ 2      $ 4       $ (3   $ (15        

Average Assets (a)

   $ 73,093       $ 102,835      $ 6,659      $ 11,501      $ 5,597       $ 12,690      $ 83,776      $ 296,151   

 

160    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

Six months ended June 30

In millions

   Retail
Banking
     Corporate &
Institutional
Banking
    Asset
Management
Group
     Residential
Mortgage
Banking
    BlackRock      Non-Strategic
Assets
Portfolio
    Other     Consolidated  

2013

                     

Income Statement

                     

Net interest income

   $ 2,061       $ 1,838      $ 143       $ 99         $ 367      $ 139      $ 4,647   

Noninterest income

     976         862        366         420      $ 287         27        434        3,372   

Total revenue

     3,037         2,700        509         519        287         394        573        8,019   

Provision for credit losses (benefit)

     310         (26     6         24           81        (2     393   

Depreciation and amortization

     92         64        21         6             169        352   

Other noninterest expense

     2,195         915        357         386                 93        532        4,478   

Income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling interests

     440         1,747        125         103        287         220        (126     2,796   

Income taxes (benefit)

     162         594        46         38        67         81        (319     669   

Net income

   $ 278       $ 1,153      $ 79       $ 65      $ 220       $ 139      $ 193      $ 2,127   

Inter-segment revenue

   $ 2       $ 11      $ 6       $ 3      $ 8       $ (5   $ (25        

Average Assets (a)

   $ 74,317       $ 111,941      $ 7,210       $ 10,604      $ 5,982       $ 10,511      $ 82,167      $ 302,732   

2012

                     

Income Statement

                     

Net interest income

   $ 2,158       $ 1,975      $ 150       $ 104         $ 438      $ (8   $ 4,817   

Noninterest income

     828         682        333         80      $ 227         (17     405        2,538   

Total revenue

     2,986         2,657        483         184        227         421        397        7,355   

Provision for credit losses (benefit)

     300         52        9         (9        68        21        441   

Depreciation and amortization

     94         67        20         5             158        344   

Other noninterest expense

     2,146         892        337         428                 135        821        4,759   

Income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling interests

     446         1,646        117         (240     227         218        (603     1,811   

Income taxes (benefit)

     163         574        43         (88     49         80        (367     454   

Net income (loss)

   $ 283       $ 1,072      $ 74       $ (152   $ 178       $ 138      $ (236   $ 1,357   

Inter-segment revenue

            $ 18      $ 6       $ 4      $ 7       $ (5   $ (30        

Average Assets (a)

   $ 71,420       $ 97,866      $ 6,613       $ 11,745      $ 5,597       $ 12,407      $ 83,199      $ 288,847   
(a) Period-end balances for BlackRock.

NOTE 20 SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On July 23, 2013, we completed the redemption of the $22 million of trust preferred securities issued by Fidelity Capital Trust II, originally called on June 7, 2013.

On July 25, 2013, PNC Bank issued $750 million of subordinated notes with a maturity date of July 25, 2023. Interest is payable semi-annually at a fixed rate of 3.80% on January 25 and July 25 of each year, beginning on January 25, 2014.

On August 1, 2013, we called for redemption, to be completed on September 16, 2013, the $35 million of trust preferred securities issued by MAF Bancorp Capital Trust II.

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    161


Table of Contents

STATISTICAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.

Average Consolidated Balance Sheet And Net Interest Analysis

 

        Six months ended June 30  
       2013        2012  
Taxable-equivalent basis
Dollars in millions
     Average
Balances
       Interest
Income/
Expense
       Average
Yields/
Rates
       Average
Balances
       Interest
Income/
Expense
       Average
Yields/
Rates
 

Assets

                               

Interest-earning assets:

                               

Investment securities

                               

Securities available for sale

                               

Residential mortgage-backed

                               

Agency

     $ 24,751         $ 334           2.70      $ 27,000         $ 426           3.16

Non-agency

       5,957           163           5.46           6,646           183           5.50   

Commercial mortgage-backed

       3,800           76           4.01           3,667           81           4.42   

Asset-backed

       5,826           54           1.86           4,865           50           2.06   

US Treasury and government agencies

       2,393           18           1.53           2,836           29           2.04   

State and municipal

       2,186           52           4.71           1,836           45           4.87   

Other debt

       2,689           34           2.48           3,087           39           2.56   

Corporate stocks and other

       335                      .13           332                      .07   

Total securities available for sale

       47,937           731           3.05           50,269           853           3.39   

Securities held to maturity

                               

Residential mortgage-backed

       3,988           67           3.35           4,418           80           3.64   

Commercial mortgage-backed

       3,634           82           4.53           4,506           104           4.59   

Asset-backed

       902           8           1.76           1,022           9           1.75   

US Treasury and government agencies

       232           4           3.78           223           4           3.79   

State and municipal

       640           14           4.25           671           14           4.19   

Other

       350           5           2.86           360           5           2.86   

Total securities held to maturity

       9,746           180           3.70           11,200           216           3.86   

Total investment securities

       57,683           911           3.16           61,469           1,069           3.48   

Loans

                               

Commercial

       84,752           1,648           3.87           73,208           1,716           4.64   

Commercial real estate

       18,855           469           4.94           17,630           490           5.50   

Equipment lease financing

       7,296           155           4.23           6,481           157           4.85   

Consumer

       61,499           1,383           4.54           58,490           1,374           4.72   

Residential real estate

       14,957           390           5.21           15,430           425           5.51   

Total loans

       187,359           4,045           4.32           171,239           4,162           4.84   

Loans held for sale

       3,175           85           5.39           2,963           95           6.44   

Federal funds sold and resale agreements

       1,159           4           .68           1,744           13           1.52   

Other

       6,765           115           3.44           6,518           120           3.67   

Total interest-earning assets/interest income

       256,141           5,160           4.03           243,933           5,459           4.46   

Noninterest-earning assets:

                               

Allowance for loan and lease losses

       (3,879                    (4,245          

Cash and due from banks

       3,961                       3,735             

Other

       46,509                       45,424             

Total assets

     $ 302,732                     $ 288,847             

Liabilities and Equity

                               

Interest-bearing liabilities:

                               

Interest-bearing deposits

                               

Money market

     $ 69,063           63           .19         $ 64,032           69           .22   

Demand

       39,774           9           .05           32,993           7           .04   

Savings

       10,899           5           .10           9,596           5           .10   

Retail certificates of deposit

       23,062           96           .84           28,192           97           .69   

Time deposits in foreign offices and other time

       2,216           6           .52           3,407           8           .49   

Total interest-bearing deposits

       145,014           179           .25           138,220           186           .27   

Borrowed funds

                               

Federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements

       4,229           3           .15           4,744           5           .22   

Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings

       7,437           21           .57           9,603           37           .77   

Bank notes and senior debt

       10,679           95           1.77           10,878           132           2.39   

Subordinated debt

       7,125           100           2.81           7,506           185           4.94   

Commercial paper

       7,613           9           .23           6,957           9           .26   

Other

       2,078           26           2.45           1,980           22           2.14   

Total borrowed funds

       39,161           254           1.29           41,668           390           1.86   

Total interest-bearing liabilities/interest expense

       184,175           433           .47           179,888           576           .64   

Noninterest-bearing liabilities and equity:

                               

Noninterest-bearing deposits

       64,800                       59,189             

Allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit

       244                       242             

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

       11,406                       10,781             

Equity

       42,107                       38,747             

Total liabilities and equity

     $ 302,732                               $ 288,847                         

Interest rate spread

                 3.56                     3.82   

Impact of noninterest-bearing sources

                             .13                                 .17   

Net interest income/margin

                $ 4,727           3.69                 $ 4,883           3.99

Nonaccrual loans are included in loans, net of unearned income. The impact of financial derivatives used in interest rate risk management is included in the interest income/expense and average yields/rates of the related assets and liabilities. Basis adjustments related to hedged items are included in noninterest-earning assets and noninterest-bearing liabilities. Average balances of securities are based on amortized historical cost (excluding adjustments to fair value, which are included in other assets). Average balances for certain loans and borrowed funds accounted for at fair value, with changes in fair value recorded in trading noninterest income, are included in noninterest-earning assets and noninterest-bearing liabilities. The interest-earning deposits with the Federal Reserve are included in the ‘Other’ interest-earning assets category.

 

162    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents
Second Quarter 2013     First Quarter 2013     Second Quarter 2012  
               

Average

Balances

    Interest Income/
Expense
   

Average

Yields/

Rates

   

Average

Balances

   

Interest

Income/

Expense

   

Average

Yields/

Rates

   

Average

Balances

   

Interest

Income/

Expense

   

Average

Yields/

Rates

 
               
               
               
               
               
  $24,339      $ 152        2.50   $ 25,168      $ 182        2.90   $ 26,968      $ 214        3.17
  5,889        82        5.51        6,025        81        5.40        6,716        94        5.63   
  3,855        38        4.00        3,745        38        4.02        3,561        39        4.41   
  5,919        27        1.80        5,731        27        1.92        5,401        26        1.91   
  2,074        7        1.37        2,715        11        1.65        2,549        15        2.33   
  2,182        24        4.48        2,189        28        4.93        1,902        22        4.63   
  2,728        17        2.39        2,649        17        2.58        3,178        20        2.56   
  304                .14        368                .12        317                .11   
  47,290        347        2.93        48,590        384        3.16        50,592        430        3.40   
               
  3,833        31        3.26        4,146        36        3.44        4,259        39        3.70   
  3,521        38        4.34        3,747        44        4.71        4,376        51        4.56   
  978        4        1.74        826        4        1.80        874        4        1.83   
  233        2        3.80        231        2        3.77        225        2        3.79   
  640        7        4.27        639        7        4.23        671        7        4.20   
  349        3        2.89        352        2        2.82        359        2        2.89   
  9,554        85        3.57        9,941        95        3.82        10,764        105        3.90   
  56,844        432        3.04        58,531        479        3.27        61,356        535        3.49   
               
  86,015        807        3.71        83,476        841        4.03        77,131        927        4.75   
  18,860        231        4.84        18,850        238        5.05        18,440        270        5.78   
  7,350        82        4.41        7,241        73        4.05        6,586        81        4.96   
  61,587        676        4.40        61,411        707        4.67        59,832        695        4.67   
  14,794        190        5.13        15,121        200        5.29        15,932        216        5.44   
  188,606        1,986        4.19        186,099        2,059        4.45        177,921        2,189        4.90   
  3,072        32        4.22        3,279        53        6.49        3,016        45        6.00   
  1,141        2        .61        1,176        2        .74        1,666        6        1.45   
  6,439        57        3.66        7,095        58        3.25        6,173        56        3.62   
  256,102        2,509        3.91        256,180        2,651        4.15        250,132        2,831        4.51   
               
  (3,821)            (3,937         (4,176    
  3,869            4,055            3,694       
  45,877            47,147            46,501       
  $302,027          $ 303,445          $ 296,151       
               
               
               
  $69,123        30        .18      $ 69,003        33        .19      $ 66,902        34        .21   
  40,172        5        .05        39,372        4        .04        34,388        4        .04   
  11,124        2        .10        10,671        3        .10        10,008        2        .10   
  22,641        47        .82        23,488        49        .85        27,373        39        .57   
  2,164        2        .43        2,267        4        .61        3,577        4        .49   
  145,224        86        .24        144,801        93        .26        142,248        83        .24   
               
  4,132        1        .14        4,328        2        .16        4,937        3        .21   
  7,218        10        .53        7,657        11        .61        10,238        19        .74   
  10,886        47        1.71        10,469        48        1.83        10,618        62        2.30   
  7,003        49        2.78        7,249        51        2.83        7,293        87        4.77   
  7,263        4        .22        7,967        5        .25        8,229        5        .26   
  2,099        14        2.62        2,057        12        2.28        1,809        11        2.25   
  38,601        125        1.28        39,727        129        1.30        43,124        187        1.72   
  183,825        211        .46        184,528        222        .48        185,372        270        .58   
               
  64,749            64,850            60,478       
  238            249            243       
  10,929            11,891            10,375       
  42,286            41,927            39,683       
  $302,027                      $ 303,445                      $ 296,151                   
      3.45            3.67            3.93   
                  .13                        .14                        .15   
        $ 2,298        3.58           $ 2,429        3.81           $ 2,561        4.08

Loan fees for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012 were $110 million and $105 million, respectively. Loan fees for the three months ended June 30, 2013, March 31, 2013, and June 30, 2012 were $58 million, $52 million, and $56 million, respectively.

Interest income includes the effects of taxable-equivalent adjustments using a statutory federal income tax rate of 35% to increase tax-exempt interest income to a taxable-equivalent basis. The taxable-equivalent adjustments to interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012 were $80 million and $66 million, respectively. The taxable-equivalent adjustments to interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2013, March 31, 2013, and June 30, 2012 were $40 million, $40 million, and $35 million, respectively.

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    163


Table of Contents

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

See the information set forth in Note 17 Legal Proceedings in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements under Part I, Item 1 of this Report, which is incorporated by reference in response to this item.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

There are no material changes from any of the risk factors previously disclosed in PNC’s 2012 Form 10-K in response to Part I, Item 1A.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Details of our repurchases of PNC common stock during the second quarter of 2013 are included in the following table:

In thousands, except per share data

 

2013 period  

Total shares
purchased

(a)

 

Average

price
paid per
share

   

Total shares
purchased

as part of

publicly
announced
programs
(b)

 

Maximum

number

of shares

that may

yet be

purchased
under the

programs
(b)

 

April 1 – 30

  34   $ 59.63          21,551   

May 1 – 31

  18   $ 61.81          21,551   

June 1 – 30

  19   $ 62.07          21,551   

Total

  71   $ 60.85               
(a) Reflects PNC common stock purchased in connection with our various employee benefit plans. No shares were purchased under the program referred to in note (b) to this table during the second quarter of 2013. Note 15 Employee Benefit Plans and Note 16 Stock Based Compensation Plans in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K include additional information regarding our employee benefit plans that use PNC common stock.
(b) Our current stock repurchase program allows us to purchase up to 25 million shares on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. This program was authorized on October 4, 2007 and will remain in effect until fully utilized or until modified, superseded or terminated. The extent and timing of share repurchases under this program will depend on a number of factors including, among others, market and general economic conditions, economic capital and regulatory capital considerations, alternative uses of capital, the potential impact on our credit ratings, and contractual and regulatory limitations, including the impact of the Federal Reserve’s supervisory assessment of capital adequacy program.

In addition to the repurchases of PNC common stock during the second quarter of 2013 included in the table above, on April 19, 2013, PNC redeemed all 1,500 shares of its Series L Preferred Stock at a price of $100,000 per share plus accrued and unpaid interest and all 6,000,000 depositary shares representing fractional interests therein at a price of $25.00 per depositary share plus accrued and unpaid interest.

 

 

164    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

The following exhibit index lists Exhibits filed, or in the case of Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 furnished, with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q:

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

10.82    Additional 2013 forms of employee stock option, performance unit, restricted stock and restricted share unit agreements
12.1    Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
12.2    Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
31.1    Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2    Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1    Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
32.2    Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
101    Interactive Data File (XBRL)

You can obtain copies of these Exhibits electronically at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov or by mail from the Public Reference Section of the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549 at prescribed rates. The Exhibits are also available as part of this Form 10-Q on PNC’s corporate website at www.pnc.com/secfilings. Shareholders and bondholders may also obtain copies of Exhibits, without charge, by contacting Shareholder Relations at 800-843-2206 or via e-mail at investor.relations@pnc.com. The interactive data file (XBRL) exhibit is only available electronically.

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on August 8, 2013 on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.

 

/s/ Richard J. Johnson

Richard J. Johnson

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)

 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    165


Table of Contents

CORPORATE INFORMATION

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.

CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.

One PNC Plaza, 249 Fifth Avenue

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222-2707

412-762-2000

STOCK LISTING The common stock of The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol PNC.

INTERNET INFORMATION The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.’s financial reports and information about its products and services are available on the internet at www.pnc.com. We provide information for investors on our corporate website under “About PNC – Investor Relations,” such as Investor Events, Quarterly Earnings, SEC Filings, Financial Information, Financial Press Releases and Message from the CEO. Under “Investor Relations,” we will from time to time post information that we believe may be important or useful to investors. We use our Twitter account, @pncnews, as an additional way of disseminating public information from time to time to investors. We generally post the following on our corporate website shortly before or promptly following its first use or release: financially-related press releases (including earnings releases), various SEC filings, presentation materials associated with earnings and other investor conference calls or events, and access to live and taped audio from earnings and other investor conference calls or events. For other investor conference calls or events, we generally post presentation materials associated with such events on our corporate website prior to or promptly following the event, and when posting prior to the event, this may range from shortly before to potentially several days in advance of the event. When warranted, we will also use our website to expedite public access to time-critical information regarding PNC in advance of distribution of a press release or a filing with the SEC disclosing the same information.

Starting in 2013, PNC is required to provide additional public disclosure regarding estimated income, losses and pro forma regulatory capital ratios under supervisory hypothetical severely adverse economic scenarios in March of each year and under a PNC-developed hypothetical severely adverse economic scenario in September of each year, as well as information concerning its capital stress testing processes, pursuant to the stress testing regulations adopted by the Federal Reserve and the OCC, and is required to make certain market risk-related public disclosures under the Federal banking agencies’ final market risk capital rule that became effective on January 1, 2013 and implements the enhancements to the market risk framework adopted by the Basel Committee (commonly referred to as “Basel II.5”). Under these regulations, PNC may be able to satisfy at least a

portion of these requirements through postings on its website, and PNC expects to do so without also providing disclosure of this information through filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

You can also find the SEC reports and corporate governance information described in the sections below in the Investor Relations section of our website.

Where we have included web addresses in this Report, such as our web address and the web address of the SEC, we have included those web addresses as inactive textual references only. Except as specifically incorporated by reference into this Report, information on those websites is not part hereof.

FINANCIAL INFORMATION We are subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), and, in accordance with the Exchange Act, we file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements, and other information with the SEC. Our SEC File Number is 001-09718. You can obtain copies of these and other filings, including exhibits, electronically at the SEC’s internet website at www.sec.gov or on PNC’s corporate internet website at www.pnc.com/secfilings. Shareholders and bond holders may also obtain copies of these filings without charge by contacting Shareholder Services at 800-982-7652 or via the online contact form at www.computershare.com/contactus for copies without exhibits, and by contacting Shareholder Relations at 800-843-2206 or via email at investor.relations@pnc.com for copies of exhibits, including financial statement and schedule exhibits where applicable. The interactive data file (XBRL) exhibit is only available electronically.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AT PNC Information about our Board of Directors and its committees and corporate governance at PNC is available on PNC’s corporate website at www.pnc.com/corporategovernance. Shareholders who would like to request printed copies of PNC’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics or our Corporate Governance Guidelines or the charters of our Board’s Audit, Nominating and Governance, Personnel and Compensation, or Risk Committees (all of which are posted on the PNC corporate website) may do so by sending their requests to PNC’s Corporate Secretary at corporate headquarters at the above address. Copies will be provided without charge to shareholders.

INQUIRIES For financial services call 888-PNC-2265.

Individual shareholders should contact Shareholder Services at 800-982-7652.

Analysts and institutional investors should contact William H. Callihan, Senior Vice President, Director of Investor Relations, at 412-762-8257 or via email at investor.relations@pnc.com.

 

 

166    The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q


Table of Contents

News media representatives and others seeking general information should contact Fred Solomon, Senior Vice President, Corporate Communications, at 412-762-4550 or via email at corporate.communications@pnc.com.

COMMON STOCK PRICES/DIVIDENDS DECLARED The table below sets forth by quarter the range of high and low sale and quarter-end closing prices for The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. common stock and the cash dividends declared per common share.

 

     High     Low     Close     Cash
Dividends
Declared
(a)
 

2013 Quarter

         

First

  $ 66.93      $ 58.96      $ 66.50      $ .40   

Second

    74.19        63.69        72.92        .44   

Total

                          $ .84   

2012 Quarter

         

First

  $ 64.79      $ 56.88      $ 64.49      $ .35   

Second

    67.89        55.60        61.11        .40   

Third

    67.04        56.76        63.10        .40   

Fourth

    65.73        53.36        58.31        .40   

Total

                          $ 1.55   
(a) Our Board approved a third quarter 2013 cash dividend of $.44 per common share, which was payable on August 5, 2013.

DIVIDEND POLICY Holders of PNC common stock are entitled to receive dividends when declared by the Board of Directors out of funds legally available for this purpose. Our Board of

Directors may not pay or set apart dividends on the common stock until dividends for all past dividend periods on any series of outstanding preferred stock have been paid or declared and set apart for payment. The Board presently intends to continue the policy of paying quarterly cash dividends. The amount of any future dividends will depend on economic and market conditions, our financial condition and operating results, and other factors, including contractual restrictions and applicable government regulations and policies (such as those relating to the ability of bank and non-bank subsidiaries to pay dividends to the parent company and regulatory capital limitations, including the impact of the Federal Reserve’s supervisory assessment of capital adequacy program).

DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT AND STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan enables holders of our common and preferred Series B stock to conveniently purchase additional shares of common stock. You can obtain a prospectus and enrollment form by contacting Shareholder Services at 800-982-7652.

REGISTRAR AND STOCK TRANSFER AGENT

Computershare Trust Company, N.A.

250 Royall Street

Canton, MA 02021

800-982-7652

 

 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. – Form 10-Q    167