UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
x |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012
or
¨ |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-09718
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Pennsylvania |
|
25-1435979 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
One PNC Plaza, 249 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222-2707
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(412) 762-2000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every
Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller
reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer |
|
x |
|
Accelerated filer |
|
¨ |
|
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer |
|
¨ |
|
Smaller reporting company |
|
¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
As of May 2, 2012, there were 528,783,529 shares of the registrants common stock ($5 par value) outstanding.
THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP,
INC.
Cross-Reference Index to First Quarter 2012 Form 10-Q
THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP,
INC.
Cross-Reference Index to First Quarter 2012 Form 10-Q (continued)
MD&A TABLE REFERENCE
FINANCIAL REVIEW
TABLE 1: CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
HIGHLIGHTS
THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP,
INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars in millions, except per share data
Unaudited |
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Financial Results (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
2,291 |
|
|
$ |
2,176 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
1,441 |
|
|
|
1,455 |
|
Total revenue |
|
|
3,732 |
|
|
|
3,631 |
|
Noninterest expense (b) |
|
|
2,455 |
|
|
|
2,070 |
|
Pretax, pre-provision earnings (c) |
|
|
1,277 |
|
|
|
1,561 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
421 |
|
Income before income taxes and noncontrolling interests (pretax earnings) |
|
$ |
1,092 |
|
|
$ |
1,140 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
811 |
|
|
$ |
832 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Preferred stock dividends and discount accretion |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
766 |
|
|
$ |
833 |
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
1.44 |
|
|
$ |
1.57 |
|
Cash dividends declared per common share (d) |
|
$ |
.35 |
|
|
$ |
.10 |
|
Integration costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax |
|
$ |
145 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
After-tax |
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
Impact on diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (e) |
|
|
3.90 |
% |
|
|
3.94 |
% |
Noninterest income to total revenue |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Efficiency |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
Return on: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shareholders equity |
|
|
9.41 |
|
|
|
11.12 |
|
Average assets |
|
|
1.16 |
|
|
|
1.29 |
|
See page 57 for a glossary of certain terms used in this Report.
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current period presentation, which we believe is more meaningful to readers of our consolidated financial statements. The after-tax
amounts in this table and notes below were calculated using a marginal federal income tax rate of 35% and include applicable income tax adjustments.
(a) |
The Executive Summary and Consolidated Income Statement Review portions of the Financial Review section of this Report provide information regarding items impacting the
comparability of the periods presented. |
(b) |
Includes expenses of $38 million and $5 million ($24 million and $4 million after taxes, respectively) for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and March 31,
2011 for residential mortgage foreclosure-related expenses. The impact on diluted earnings per share was $.05, and $.01 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011. |
(c) |
We believe that pretax, pre-provision earnings, a non-GAAP measure, is useful as a tool to help evaluate our earnings created by operating leverage.
|
(d) |
In April 2012, the PNC Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend on common stock of 40 cents per share, an increase of 5 cents per share, or 14%, from the
prior quarterly dividend of 35 cents per share. The increased dividend was paid on the next business day after May 5, 2012 to shareholders of record at the close of business on April 17, 2012. |
(e) |
Calculated as annualized taxable-equivalent net interest income divided by average earning assets. The interest income earned on certain earning assets is completely or
partially exempt from federal income tax. As such, these tax-exempt instruments typically yield lower returns than taxable investments. To provide more meaningful comparisons of net interest margins for all earning assets, we use net interest income
on a taxable-equivalent basis in calculating net interest margin by increasing the interest income earned on tax-exempt assets to make it fully equivalent to interest income earned on taxable investments. This adjustment is not permitted under
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the Consolidated Income Statement. The taxable-equivalent adjustments to net interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011 were $31 million and $24 million,
respectively. |
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 1
TABLE 1: CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
(CONTINUED) (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited |
|
March 31 2012 |
|
|
December 31 2011 |
|
|
March 31 2011 |
|
Balance Sheet Data (dollars in millions, except per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
$ |
295,883 |
|
|
$ |
271,205 |
|
|
$ |
259,378 |
|
Loans (b) (c) |
|
|
176,214 |
|
|
|
159,014 |
|
|
|
149,387 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses (b) |
|
|
4,196 |
|
|
|
4,347 |
|
|
|
4,759 |
|
Interest-earning deposits with banks (b) |
|
|
2,084 |
|
|
|
1,169 |
|
|
|
1,359 |
|
Investment securities (b) |
|
|
64,554 |
|
|
|
60,634 |
|
|
|
60,992 |
|
Loans held for sale (c) |
|
|
2,456 |
|
|
|
2,936 |
|
|
|
2,980 |
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets |
|
|
11,188 |
|
|
|
10,144 |
|
|
|
10,764 |
|
Equity investments (b) (d) |
|
|
10,352 |
|
|
|
10,134 |
|
|
|
9,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
|
62,463 |
|
|
|
59,048 |
|
|
|
48,707 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
143,664 |
|
|
|
128,918 |
|
|
|
133,283 |
|
Total deposits |
|
|
206,127 |
|
|
|
187,966 |
|
|
|
181,990 |
|
Transaction deposits |
|
|
164,575 |
|
|
|
147,637 |
|
|
|
134,516 |
|
Borrowed funds (b) |
|
|
42,539 |
|
|
|
36,704 |
|
|
|
34,996 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
35,045 |
|
|
|
34,053 |
|
|
|
31,132 |
|
Common shareholders equity |
|
|
33,408 |
|
|
|
32,417 |
|
|
|
30,485 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
(309 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Book value per common share |
|
|
63.26 |
|
|
|
61.52 |
|
|
|
58.01 |
|
Common shares outstanding (millions) |
|
|
528 |
|
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
526 |
|
Loans to deposits |
|
|
85 |
% |
|
|
85 |
% |
|
|
82 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Client Assets (billions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discretionary assets under management |
|
$ |
112 |
|
|
$ |
107 |
|
|
$ |
110 |
|
Nondiscretionary assets under administration |
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
Total assets under administration |
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
Brokerage account assets |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Total client assets |
|
$ |
256 |
|
|
$ |
244 |
|
|
$ |
254 |
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 common |
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
10.3 |
% |
Tier 1 risk-based (e) |
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
Total risk-based (e) |
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
16.2 |
|
Leverage (e) |
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
Common shareholders equity to assets |
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Quality |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming loans to total loans |
|
|
2.03 |
% |
|
|
2.24 |
% |
|
|
2.88 |
% |
Nonperforming assets to total loans, OREO and foreclosed assets |
|
|
2.46 |
|
|
|
2.60 |
|
|
|
3.29 |
|
Nonperforming assets to total assets |
|
|
1.47 |
|
|
|
1.53 |
|
|
|
1.90 |
|
Net charge-offs to average loans (for the three months ended) (annualized) |
|
|
.81 |
|
|
|
.83 |
|
|
|
1.44 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses to total loans |
|
|
2.38 |
|
|
|
2.73 |
|
|
|
3.19 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses to nonperforming loans (f) |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more (g) |
|
$ |
2,609 |
|
|
$ |
2,973 |
|
|
$ |
2,645 |
|
(a) |
The Executive Summary and Consolidated Balance Sheet Review portions of the Financial Review section of this Report provide information regarding items impacting the
comparability of the periods presented. |
(b) |
Amounts include consolidated variable interest entities. See Consolidated Balance Sheet in Part I, Item 1 of this Report for additional information.
|
(c) |
Amounts include assets for which we have elected the fair value option. See Consolidated Balance Sheet in Part I, Item 1 of this Report for additional information.
|
(d) |
Amounts include our equity interest in BlackRock. |
(e) |
The minimum US regulatory capital ratios under Basel I are 4.0% for Tier 1 risk-based, 8.0% for Total risk-based, and 4.0% for Leverage. The comparable well-capitalized
levels are 6.0% for Tier 1 risk-based, 10.0% for Total risk-based, and 5.0% for Leverage. |
(f) |
The allowance for loan and lease losses includes impairment reserves attributable to purchased impaired loans. Nonperforming loans exclude certain government insured or
guaranteed loans, loans held for sale, loans accounted for under the fair value option and purchased impaired loans. |
(g) |
Excludes loans held for sale and purchased impaired loans. In the first quarter of 2012, we adopted a policy stating that home equity loans past due 90 days or more
would be placed on nonaccrual status. Prior policy required that these loans be past due 180 days before being placed on nonaccrual status. |
2 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
FINANCIAL REVIEW
THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
This Financial Review, including the Consolidated Financial Highlights, should be read together with our unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
and unaudited Statistical Information included elsewhere in this Report and with Items 6, 7, 8 and 9A of our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K as amended by Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (2011 Form 10-K). We have reclassified certain prior
period amounts to conform with the current period presentation, which we believe is more meaningful to readers of our consolidated financial statements. For information regarding certain business, regulatory and legal risks, see the following
sections as they appear in this Report and in our 2011 Form 10-K: the Risk Management section of the Financial Review portion of the respective report; Item 1A Risk Factors included in our 2011 Form 10-K; and the Legal Proceedings and
Commitments and Guarantees Notes of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the respective report. Also, see the Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information and Critical Accounting Estimates And Judgments sections
in this Financial Review for certain other factors that could cause actual results or future events to differ, perhaps materially, from historical performance and from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements included in this Report. See
Note 18 Segment Reporting in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Report for a reconciliation of total business segment earnings to total PNC consolidated net income as reported on a generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) basis.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PNC is one of the largest diversified financial services companies in the United States and is headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
PNC has businesses engaged in retail banking, corporate and institutional banking, asset management, and residential mortgage banking, providing many of
its products and services nationally and others in PNCs primary geographic markets located in Pennsylvania, Ohio, New Jersey, Michigan, Illinois, Maryland, Indiana, North Carolina, Florida, Kentucky, Washington, D.C., Alabama, Delaware,
Georgia, Virginia, Missouri, Wisconsin and South Carolina. PNC also provides certain products and services internationally.
KEY STRATEGIC GOALS
We manage our company for the long term and seek to manage risk in keeping with a moderate risk philosophy. We emphasize maintaining strong capital and liquidity positions, investing in our markets and
products, and embracing our corporate responsibility to the communities where we do business.
Our strategy to enhance shareholder value
centers on driving growth in pre-tax, pre-provision earnings by achieving growth in revenue from our balance sheet and diverse business mix that exceeds growth in expenses controlled through disciplined cost management.
The primary drivers of revenue are the acquisition, expansion and retention of customer relationships. We strive to expand our customer base by offering
convenient banking options and leading technology solutions, providing a broad range of fee-based and credit products and services, focusing on customer service, and managing a significantly enhanced branding initiative. This strategy is designed to
give our customers choices based on their needs. Rather than striving to optimize fee revenue in the short term, our approach is focused on effectively growing targeted market share and
share of wallet. We may also grow revenue through appropriate and targeted acquisitions and, in certain businesses, by expanding into new geographical markets.
We have made substantial progress in transitioning our balance sheet and managing our risks over the past several years. Our actions have resulted in a
strong capital position, created a well-positioned balance sheet, reduced credit risk, and helped us to maintain strong liquidity and investment flexibility to adjust, where appropriate and permissible, to changing interest rates and market
conditions. We remain committed to our moderate risk philosophy. We believe, however, that characterizing our view of our overall risk profile at a given time in a single word (as opposed to describing our efforts to seek to manage risk in keeping
with our moderate risk philosophy) is not meaningful to investors and, as a result, we will no longer make such characterizations in our public disclosures. PNC faces a variety of risks that may impact different aspects of our risk profile from time
to time, the extent of each varying depending on factors such as the current economic, political and regulatory environment, the impact of mergers and acquisition activity, and operational challenges. Many of these risks and our risk management
strategies are described in more detail in our 2011 Form 10-K and elsewhere in this Report.
We expect to build capital via retained earnings
while having opportunities to return capital to shareholders during 2012. See the 2012 Capital and Liquidity Actions section of this Executive Summary, the Funding and Capital Sources section of the Consolidated Balance Sheet Review section and the
Liquidity Risk Management section of this Financial Review and the Supervision and Regulation section in Item 1 of our 2011 Form 10-K.
RBC BANK (USA) ACQUISITION
On March 2, 2012, we acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding common stock of RBC Bank (USA), the US retail banking subsidiary of Royal Bank of Canada. As part of the
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 3
acquisition, PNC also purchased a credit card portfolio from RBC Bank (Georgia), National Association. PNC paid $3.6 billion in cash as the consideration for the acquisition of both RBC Bank
(USA) and the credit card portfolio, subject to certain post-closing adjustments that are considered normal course of business. The transaction added approximately $18.1 billion in deposits, $14.5 billion of loans and $1.1 billion of goodwill and
intangible assets to PNCs Consolidated Balance Sheet. Our Consolidated Income Statement includes the impact of business activity associated with the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition subsequent to March 2, 2012.
RBC Bank (USA), based in Raleigh, North Carolina, operated more than 400 branches in North Carolina, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Virginia and South
Carolina. The primary reasons for the acquisition of RBC were to enhance shareholder value, to improve PNCs competitive position in the financial services industry and to further expand PNCs existing branch network in the states where it
currently operates as well as expanding into new markets. When combined with PNCs existing network, PNC now has 2,900 branches across 17 states and the District of Columbia, ranking it fifth among U.S. banks in branches. See Note 2 Acquisition
and Divestiture Activity in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in this Report.
On April 20, 2012, PNC signed a purchase and
assumption agreement with Union Bank, N.A. pursuant to which Union Bank will assume the deposits and acquire certain assets of the Smartstreet business unit, which was acquired by PNC as part of the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition. Smartstreet is a
nationwide business focused on homeowner or community association managers and has approximately $1 billion of assets and deposits as of March 31, 2012. The transaction is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2012 and is subject to
certain closing conditions, including regulatory approval. Financial terms of the transaction have not been disclosed.
FLAGSTAR BRANCH ACQUISITION
Effective December 9, 2011, PNC acquired 27 branches in the northern metropolitan Atlanta, Georgia area from Flagstar Bank, FSB, a subsidiary of Flagstar Bancorp, Inc. We assumed approximately $210.5
million of deposits associated with these branches. No loans were acquired in the transaction. Our Consolidated Income Statement includes the impact of the branch activity subsequent to our December 9, 2011 acquisition. See Note 2 Acquisition
and Divestiture Activity in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in this Report.
BANKATLANTIC
BRANCH ACQUISITION
Effective June 6, 2011, PNC acquired 19 branches in the greater Tampa, Florida
area from BankAtlantic, a subsidiary of BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. We assumed approximately $324.5 million of deposits associated with these branches. No loans were acquired in the transaction. Our Consolidated
Income Statement includes the impact of the branch activity subsequent to our June 6, 2011 acquisition. See Note 2 Acquisition and Divestiture Activity in the Notes To Consolidated Financial
Statements in this Report.
2012 CAPITAL AND LIQUIDITY ACTIONS
Our ability to take certain capital actions, including plans to pay or increase common stock dividends or to repurchase shares under
current or future programs, is subject to the results of the supervisory assessment of capital adequacy undertaken by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Federal Reserve) and our primary bank regulators as part of the Comprehensive
Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) process. This capital adequacy assessment is based on a review of a comprehensive capital plan submitted to the Federal Reserve. In connection with the annual review process for 2012 (2012 CCAR), PNC filed its
capital plan with the Federal Reserve on January 9, 2012. As we announced on March 13, 2012, the Federal Reserve accepted the capital plan that we submitted for their review and did not object to our capital actions proposed as part of
that plan. The capital actions included recommendations to increase the quarterly common stock dividend and a modest share repurchase program. For additional information concerning the CCAR process and the factors the Federal Reserve takes into
consideration in evaluating capital plans, see Item 1 Business Supervision and Regulation included in our 2011 Form 10-K.
On
April 5, 2012, consistent with our capital plan submitted to the Federal Reserve in 2012, our Board of Directors approved an increase to PNCs quarterly common stock dividend from $.35 per common share to $.40 per common share. For the
second quarter of 2012, the increased dividend was payable to shareholders of record at the close of business on April 17, 2012 and the payment date was May 5, 2012. Additionally, also consistent with that capital plan, PNC plans to
purchase up to $250 million of common stock under our existing 25 million share repurchase program in open market or privately negotiated transactions during the remainder of 2012. We did not repurchase any shares under PNCs existing
common stock repurchase program in the first quarter of 2012. The discussion of capital within the Consolidated Balance Sheet Review section of this Financial Review includes additional information regarding our common stock repurchase program.
On March 8, 2012, PNC Funding Corp issued $1 billion of senior notes, unconditionally guaranteed by The PNC Financial Services Group,
Inc., due March 8, 2022. Interest is paid semi-annually at a fixed rate of 3.30%. The offering resulted in gross proceeds to us of $990 million before offering related expenses. We intend to use the net proceeds from this offering for general
corporate purposes, which may include: advances to PNC and its subsidiaries to finance their activities, repayment of outstanding indebtedness, and repurchases and redemptions of issued and outstanding securities of PNC and its subsidiaries.
4 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
On April 10, 2012, we announced that May 25, 2012 will be the redemption date of $500 million of
trust preferred securities issued by National City Capital Trust III with a current distribution rate of 6.625% and an original scheduled maturity date of May 25, 2047 and submitted a redemption notice to the trustee. The redemption price will
be $25 per trust preferred security plus any accrued and unpaid distributions to the redemption date of May 25, 2012. In addition, on April 25, 2012 we redeemed $300 million of trust preferred securities issued by PNC Capital Trust D with
a distribution rate of 6.125% and $6 million of trust preferred securities issued by Yardville Capital Trust III with a distribution rate of 10.18%. These redemptions together will result in a noncash charge for the unamortized discounts of
approximately $130 million in the second quarter of 2012. We have an additional $1 billion of securities that are redeemable at par beginning in the latter half of 2012, and if we call those securities, we expect that the related noncash charges
will be approximately $150 million.
On April 24, 2012, we issued 60 million depositary shares, each representing a 1/4,000th
interest in a share of our Fixed-to-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series P, in an underwritten public offering resulting in gross proceeds of $1.5 billion to us before commissions and expenses. We granted the underwriters
an option to purchase up to an additional 3 million depositary shares within 30 days after April 19, 2012 at the public offering price, less underwriting discounts and commissions, to cover overallotments, if any. We intend to use the net
proceeds from the sale of the depositary shares for general corporate purposes, which may include repurchases and redemptions of issued and outstanding securities of PNC and its subsidiaries, including trust preferred securities.
RECENT MARKET AND INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENTS
There have been numerous legislative and regulatory developments and dramatic changes in the competitive landscape of our industry over the last several
years.
The United States and other governments have undertaken major reform of the regulation of the financial services industry, including
engaging in new efforts to impose requirements designed to strengthen the stability of the financial system and protect consumers and investors from financial abuse. We expect to face further increased regulation of our industry as a result of
current and future initiatives intended to provide economic stimulus, financial market stability and enhanced regulation of financial services companies and to enhance the liquidity and solvency of financial institutions and markets. We also expect
in many cases more intense scrutiny from our bank supervisors in the examination process and more aggressive enforcement of regulations on both the federal and state levels. Compliance with new regulations will increase our costs and reduce our
revenue. Some new regulations may limit our ability to pursue
certain desirable business opportunities, place constraints on business activities we currently conduct, or have other adverse impacts on our operations or revenue.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank), enacted in July 2010, mandates the most wide-ranging overhaul of financial
industry regulation in decades. Many parts of the law are now in effect and others are now in the implementation stage, which is likely to continue for several years.
Until such time as the regulatory agencies issue final regulations implementing all of the numerous provisions of Dodd-Frank, PNC will not be able to fully assess the impact the legislation will have on
its businesses. However, we believe that the expected changes will be manageable for PNC and will have a smaller impact on us than on our larger peers.
Included in these recent legislative and regulatory developments are evolving regulatory capital standards for financial institutions. Dodd-Frank requires the Federal Reserve Board to establish capital
requirements that would, among other things, eliminate the Tier 1 treatment of trust preferred securities following a phase-in period expected to begin in 2013. Evolving standards also include the so-called Basel III initiatives that are
part of the effort by international banking supervisors to improve the ability of the banking sector to absorb shocks in periods of financial and economic stress and changes by the federal banking agencies to reduce the use of credit ratings in the
rules governing regulatory capital. The recent Basel III capital initiative, which has the support of US banking regulators, includes heightened capital requirements for major banking institutions in terms of both higher quality capital and higher
regulatory capital ratios. The Basel III accord provides for the new Basel III capital standards to become effective under a phase-in period beginning January 1, 2013 and to be in full effect on January 1, 2019. Basel III capital standards
require implementing regulations and standards by the U.S. banking regulators.
The Basel III initiatives also include new, quantitative
short-term liquidity standards (the Liquidity Coverage Ratio) and long-term funding standards (the Net Stable Funding Ratio). The Liquidity Coverage Ratio, which is scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2015, requires a banking organization to
maintain a sufficient level of unencumbered, high-quality liquid assets that could be converted to cash to meet projected cash outflows during a 30-day severe stress scenario. The Net Stable Funding Ratio, which is scheduled to take effect on
January 1, 2018, is designed to promote a stable maturity structure of assets and liabilities of banking organizations over a one-year time horizon. Accordingly, it measures the amount of longer-term, stable sources of funding available to
support the portion of a banking organizations assets (both on- and off-balance sheet) that could not be readily converted to cash over a stress period lasting one year. Like the Basel III capital standards, the Basel III liquidity standards
require implementing regulations by the U.S. banking regulators.
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 5
A number of reform provisions are likely to significantly impact the ways in which banks and bank holding
companies, including PNC, do business. We provide additional information on a number of these provisions (including new regulatory agencies (such as the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)), consumer protection regulation, enhanced capital
requirements, limitations on investment in and sponsorship of funds, risk retention by securitization participants, new regulation of derivatives, potential applicability of state consumer protection laws, and limitations on interchange fees) and
some of their potential impacts on PNC in Item 1 BusinessSupervision and Regulation and Item 1A Risk Factors included in our 2011 Form 10-K.
RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE MATTERS
Beginning
in the third quarter of 2010, mortgage foreclosure documentation practices among US financial institutions received heightened attention by regulators and the media. PNCs US market share for residential servicing is approximately 1.4%
according to the National Mortgage News. The vast majority of our servicing business is on behalf of other investors, principally the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC) and the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA).
There have been, and continue to be, numerous governmental, legislative and regulatory inquiries and investigations on this topic and other issues
related to mortgage lending and servicing. These inquiries and investigations may result in significant additional actions, penalties or other remedies.
For additional information, including with respect to some of these other ongoing governmental, legislative and regulatory inquiries, please see Item 1A Risk Factors and Note 22 Legal Proceedings in
Item 8 in our 2011 Form 10-K.
PNCS PARTICIPATION IN SELECT
GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS
FDIC Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (TLGP) Transaction Account
Guarantee Program
Part of the FDICs Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program involves providing full deposit insurance coverage for
non-interest bearing transaction accounts in FDIC-insured institutions, regardless of the dollar amount (TLGP-Transaction Account Guarantee Program).
Beginning January 1, 2010, PNC Bank, N.A. ceased participating in the FDICs TLGP-Transaction Account Guarantee Program. Dodd-Frank, however, extended for two years, beginning December 31,
2010, unlimited deposit insurance coverage for non-interest bearing transaction accounts held at all banks. Therefore, eligible accounts at PNC Bank, N.A. are again eligible for unlimited deposit insurance, through December 31, 2012. Coverage
under this extension is in addition to, and separate from, the coverage available under the FDICs general deposit insurance rules. We believe that
FDIC insurance has been an attraction for customers seeking to maintain liquidity during this prolonged period of low interest rates.
Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP)
As part of its effort to stabilize the US
housing market, in March 2009 the Obama Administration published detailed guidelines implementing HAMP, and authorized servicers to begin loan modifications under the program. PNC began participating in HAMP through its then subsidiary National City
Bank in May 2009 and directly through PNC Bank, N.A. in July 2009, and entered into an agreement on October 1, 2010 to participate in the Second Lien Program. HAMP was scheduled to terminate as of December 31, 2012; however, the
Administration has announced that the HAMP program deadline will be extended to December 31, 2013.
Home Affordable Refinance Program
(HARP)
Another part of its efforts to stabilize the US housing market is the Obama Administrations Home Affordable Refinance Program
(HARP), which provided a means for certain borrowers to refinance their mortgage loans. PNC began participating in HARP in May 2009. On October 24, 2011 the Obama Administration announced revisions to the program (HARP 2), increasing borrower
eligibility and extending the program for another twelve months with a new termination date of December 31, 2013. During the fourth quarter of 2011, both FNMA and FHLMC announced their respective HARP 2 provisions and in December 2011 PNC began
participating in HARP 2 with both entities. Under HARP 2 there is no limit on the borrowers loan-to-value (LTV) for fixed rate mortgages, which was a key change from the original programs 125% LTV limit. This change significantly
increased the number of borrowers eligible for a refinance under the program. During the first quarter of 2012, nearly 30% of PNCs mortgage loan originations were original HARP or HARP 2 refinancing transactions.
KEY FACTORS AFFECTING FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
Our financial performance is substantially affected by a number of external factors outside of our control, including the following:
|
|
|
General economic conditions, including the continuity, speed and stamina of the moderate economic recovery in general and on our customers in
particular, |
|
|
|
The level of, and direction, timing and magnitude of movement in, interest rates and the shape of the interest rate yield curve,
|
|
|
|
The functioning and other performance of, and availability of liquidity in, the capital and other financial markets, |
|
|
|
Loan demand, utilization of credit commitments and standby letters of credit, and asset quality, |
|
|
|
Customer demand for non-loan products and services,
|
6 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
|
|
|
Changes in the competitive and regulatory landscape and in counterparty creditworthiness and performance as the financial services industry
restructures in the current environment, |
|
|
|
The impact of the extensive reforms enacted in the Dodd-Frank legislation and other legislative, regulatory and administrative initiatives, including
those outlined elsewhere in this Report, and |
|
|
|
The impact of market credit spreads on asset valuations. |
In addition, our success will depend upon, among other things:
|
|
|
Further success in the acquisition, growth and retention of customers, |
|
|
|
Continued development of the geographic markets related to our recent acquisitions, including full deployment of our product offerings, and integration
of the acquired RBC Bank (USA) businesses into PNC, |
|
|
|
Revenue growth and our ability to provide innovative and valued products to our customers, |
|
|
|
Our ability to utilize technology to develop and deliver products and services to our customers, |
|
|
|
Our ability to manage and implement strategic business objectives within the changing regulatory environment, |
|
|
|
A sustained focus on expense management, |
|
|
|
Managing the non-strategic assets portfolio and impaired assets, |
|
|
|
Improving our overall asset quality, |
|
|
|
Continuing to maintain and grow our deposit base as a low-cost funding source, |
|
|
|
Prudent risk and capital management related to our efforts to operate in accordance with our moderate risk philosophy, and to meet evolving regulatory
capital standards, |
|
|
|
Actions we take within the capital and other financial markets, and |
|
|
|
The impact of legal and regulatory-related contingencies. |
For additional information, please see the Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information section in this Financial Review and Item 1A Risk Factors in our 2011 Form 10-K.
INCOME STATEMENT HIGHLIGHTS
|
|
|
Net income for the first quarter of 2012 of $811 million was down 3% compared to first quarter of 2011. Net income for the first quarter of 2012
included integration costs of $145 million, additions to legal reserves of $72 million, operating expenses of $40 million for the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition, and $38 million of residential mortgage foreclosure-related expenses. The impacts of these
items were not significant to net income for the first quarter of 2011.
|
|
|
|
Net interest income of $2.3 billion for the first quarter of 2012 increased 5 percent compared with the first quarter of 2011 driven by loans added
through the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition, organic loan growth and lower funding costs. Net interest margin declined to 3.90% for the first quarter of 2012 compared to 3.94% for the first quarter of 2011, primarily as loan growth and lower funding
costs were offset by lower yields on loans and securities. |
|
|
|
Noninterest income of $1.4 billion for the first quarter 2012 declined $14 million compared to first quarter 2011. Increases were reflected in higher
residential mortgage revenue, higher asset management fees, and an increase in corporate service fees. These increases were offset by various declines in other income and by lower consumer service fees primarily reflecting the regulatory impact of
lower interchange fees on debit card transactions. |
|
|
|
The provision for credit losses declined to $185 million for the first quarter of 2012 compared to $421 million for the first quarter of 2011 as
overall credit quality improved. |
|
|
|
Noninterest expense of $2.5 billion for the first quarter of 2012 increased $385 million compared with the first quarter of 2011 primarily due to
higher integration costs, additions to legal reserves, operating expense for the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition, and an increase in expense for residential mortgage foreclosure-related matters. |
CREDIT QUALITY HIGHLIGHTS
|
|
|
Overall credit quality remained stable during the first quarter of 2012 compared with year end. |
|
|
|
Nonperforming assets increased $205 million, or 5 percent, to $4.4 billion at March 31, 2012 compared with December 31, 2011. The increase
was primarily attributable to other real estate owned added in the acquisition of RBC Bank (USA) and higher nonperforming home equity loans from a change in policy which places home equity loans on nonaccrual status when past due 90 days or more
compared with 180 days under the prior policy. These increases were partially offset by a decline in nonperforming commercial real estate and commercial loans. Nonperforming assets to total assets were 1.47 percent at March 31, 2012 compared
with 1.53 percent at December 31, 2011. |
|
|
|
Accruing loans past due decreased by $275 million, or 6%, to $4.3 billion at March 31, 2012 from $4.5 billion at December 31, 2011. Accruing
loans past due 90 days or more declined $364 million due to the change in policy for home equity loans and improvements in commercial loans and government insured
|
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 7
|
delinquent residential real estate loans. Accruing loans past due 30 to 59 days increased $119 million in the linked quarter comparison due to an increase in commercial, residential real estate
and commercial real estate loans primarily related to the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition. |
|
|
|
Net charge-offs declined to $333 million in the first quarter of 2012 compared with $533 million in the first quarter of 2011. Net charge-offs declined
in the comparison with first quarter 2011 primarily due to lower commercial real estate, commercial and residential real estate loan net charge-offs. Net charge-offs for the first quarter of 2012 were .81 percent of average loans on an annualized
basis compared with 1.44 percent for the first quarter of 2011. |
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses declined to $185 million in the first quarter of 2012 compared with $421 million in the first quarter of 2011 driven by
overall credit quality improvement and continued actions to reduce exposure levels. |
|
|
|
The allowance for loan and lease losses (ALLL) was 2.38% of total loans and 117% of nonperforming loans as of March 31, 2012 compared with 2.73%
and 122% as of December 31, 2011. |
BALANCE SHEET HIGHLIGHTS
|
|
|
PNC continued to expand customer relationships and focus on quality growth. |
|
|
|
Retail banking checking relationships increased 517,000 in the first quarter of 2012, including 460,000 from the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition.
|
|
|
|
Total loans increased by $17 billion to $176 billion at March 31, 2012 compared to December 31, 2011. |
|
|
|
Loans of approximately $14.5 billion were added in the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition. |
|
|
|
Commercial loans grew organically by approximately 5 percent, reflecting PNCs focus on long-term, broad-based client relationships. The growth
was primarily in corporate banking, asset-based lending, and real estate finance. |
|
|
|
Total deposits were $206 billion at March 31, 2012 compared with $188 billion at December 31, 2011. |
|
|
|
Deposits of approximately $18.1 billion were added in the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition. |
|
|
|
Transaction deposits also grew organically during the first quarter of 2012 and increased to $165 billion, or 80 percent of deposits, at March 31,
2012. |
|
|
|
Higher rate retail certificates of deposit continued to decline.
|
|
|
|
PNCs balance sheet remained core funded with a loans to deposits ratio of 85 percent at March 31, 2012 and reflected a strong liquidity
position. |
|
|
|
PNC maintained strong capital levels with a Tier 1 common capital ratio of 9.3 percent at March 31, 2012 and 10.3 percent at December 31,
2011. The impact on the ratio of the acquisition of RBC Bank (USA) was a decrease of approximately 1.2 percentage points. |
|
|
|
In April 2012 the PNC board of directors raised the quarterly cash dividend on common stock to 40 cents per share, an increase of 5 cents per share, or
14 percent. PNC plans to purchase up to $250 million of common stock under its existing 25 million share repurchase program in open market or privately negotiated transactions during the remainder of 2012. |
Our Consolidated Income Statement and Consolidated Balance Sheet Review sections of this Financial Review describe in greater detail the various items
that impacted our results for the first three months of 2012 and 2011 and balances at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.
AVERAGE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET HIGHLIGHTS
Various seasonal and other factors impact our period-end balances whereas average balances are generally more indicative of underlying business trends apart from the impact of acquisitions and
divestitures. The Consolidated Balance Sheet Review section of this Financial Review provides information on changes in selected Consolidated Balance Sheet categories at March 31, 2012 compared with December 31, 2011.
Total average assets were $281.5 billion for the first three months of 2012 compared with $262.6 billion for the first three months of 2011. Average
interest-earning assets were $237.7 billion for the first three months of 2012, compared with $224.1 billion in the first three months of 2011. In both comparisons, the increases were primarily driven by a $14.4 billion increase in average total
loans. The overall increase in average loans reflected the impact of approximately $5 billion of average loans from the March 2, 2012 acquisition of RBC Bank (USA) and organic growth.
Average total loans increased $14.4 billion, to $164.6 billion for the first three months of 2012 compared with the first three months of 2011. The increase in average total loans primarily reflected an
increase in commercial loans of $13.0 billion and in consumer loans of $2.7 billion, partially offset by a $.7 billion decrease in commercial real estate loans.
Loans represented 69% of average interest-earning assets for the first three months of 2012 and 67% of average interest-earning assets for the first three months of 2011.
Average investment securities decreased $.6 billion, to $61.6 billion in the first three months of 2012 compared with the first three months of 2011.
8 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
Total investment securities comprised 26% of average interest-earning assets for the first three months of
2012 and 28% for the first three months of 2011.
Average noninterest-earning assets totaled $43.8 billion in the first three months of 2012
compared with $38.5 billion in the first three months of 2011. The increase over the comparable period was driven by several individually insignificant items.
Average total deposits were $192.1 billion for the first three months of 2012 compared with $180.8 billion for the first three months of 2011. The increase in average total deposits reflected the impact
of approximately $4.6 billion of average deposits from the March 2, 2012 acquisition of RBC Bank (USA). The period end increase of $11.3 billion resulted from increases in average noninterest-bearing deposits of $10.1 billion, average
interest-bearing demand deposits of $5.3 billion and average money market deposits of $2.6 billion, offset by a decrease in retail certificates of deposit of $7.5 billion. The growth also reflects customer preferences for liquidity in this prolonged
period of low interest rates. Total deposits at March 31, 2012 were $206.1 billion compared with $188.0 billion at December 31, 2011 and are further discussed within the Consolidated Balance Sheet Review section of this Report.
Average total deposits represented 68% of average total assets for the first three months of 2012 and 69% for the first three months of 2011.
Average transaction deposits were $150.7 billion for the first three months of 2012 compared with $132.6 billion for the first three months of 2011. The
continued execution of the retail deposit strategy and corporate and personal customer preference for liquidity, as well as the impact from the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition, contributed to the year-over-year increase in average balances.
Average borrowed funds were $40.2 billion for the first three months of 2012 compared with $38.4 billion for the first three months of 2011. Net
issuances of Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) borrowings during the first quarter of 2012 and an increase in commercial paper issued drove the increase compared with the first three months of 2011. Total borrowed funds at March 31, 2012 were $42.5
billion compared with $36.7 billion at December 31, 2011 and are further discussed within the Consolidated Balance Sheet Review section of this Financial Review. The Liquidity Risk Management portion of the Risk Management section of this
Financial Review includes additional information regarding our sources and uses of borrowed funds.
BUSINESS
SEGMENT HIGHLIGHTS
Total business segment earnings were $770 million for the first three months of 2012
and $639 million for the first three
months of 2011. Highlights of results for the first quarters of 2012 and 2011 are included below. The Business Segments Review section of this Financial Review includes a Results of
Businesses-Summary table and further analysis of our business segment results over the first three months of 2012 and 2011 including presentation differences from Note 18 Segment Reporting in our Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements of this
Report.
We provide a reconciliation of total business segment earnings to PNC total consolidated net income as reported on a GAAP basis in
Note 18 Segment Reporting in our Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements of this Report.
Retail Banking
Retail Banking earned $50 million in the first three months of 2012 compared with a loss of $18 million for the same period a year ago. Earnings increased
from the prior year as a result of a lower provision for credit losses and improved net interest income partially offset by higher noninterest expense and a decline in noninterest income. Retail Banking continued to maintain its focus on growing
core customers, selectively investing in the business for future growth, and disciplined expense management.
Corporate &
Institutional Banking
Corporate & Institutional Banking earned $470 million in the first three months of 2012 as compared with
$432 million in the first three months of 2011. The increase in earnings was primarily due to higher net interest income resulting from higher average loans and deposits. We continued to focus on adding new clients, increasing cross sales and
remaining committed to strong expense discipline.
Asset Management Group
Asset Management Group earned $28 million in the first three months of 2012 compared with $43 million in the first three months of 2011. Assets under administration were $219 billion at both
March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011. Earnings for the first quarter of 2012 reflected an increase in the provision for credit losses and an increase in noninterest expense partially offset by growth in net interest income and noninterest
income. Noninterest expense increased due to continued investments in the business including additional headcount. The core growth strategies for the business include: increasing channel penetration; investing in higher growth geographies; and
investing in differentiated client-facing technology.
Residential Mortgage Banking
Residential Mortgage Banking earned $61 million in the first three months of 2012 compared with $71 million in the first three months of 2011. Earnings
declined from the prior year period primarily as a result of higher noninterest expense, partially offset by higher noninterest income and lower provision for credit losses.
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 9
BlackRock
Our BlackRock business segment earned $90 million in the first three months of 2012 and $86 million in the first three months of 2011. The higher business segment earnings from BlackRock for the first
quarter of 2012 compared to the first quarter of 2011 was primarily due to PNCs higher equity earnings from BlackRock.
Non-Strategic
Assets Portfolio
This business segment consists primarily of acquired non-strategic assets that fall outside of our core business
strategy. Non-Strategic Assets Portfolio had earnings of $71 million for the first three months of 2012 compared with $25 million in the first three months of 2011. The increase was driven primarily by a lower provision for credit losses partially
offset by a decline in revenue.
Other
Other reported earnings of $41 million for the three months of 2012 compared with earnings of $193 million for the first three months of 2011. The decrease in earnings from the first three
months of 2011 primarily reflected the impact of integration costs incurred in the 2012 period.
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT REVIEW
Our Consolidated Income Statement is presented in Part I, Item 1 of this Report.
Net income for the first three months of 2012 was $811 million, down 3% compared with $832 million for the first three months of 2011. Net income for the first quarter of 2012 included integration costs
of $145 million, additions to legal reserves of $72 million, operating expenses of $40 million for the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition and $38 million of residential mortgage foreclosure-related expenses. The impacts of these items were not significant
to net income for the first quarter of 2011.
TABLE 2: NET
INTEREST INCOME AND NET INTEREST MARGIN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 Dollars in millions |
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
2,291 |
|
|
$ |
2,176 |
|
Net interest margin |
|
|
3.90 |
% |
|
|
3.94 |
% |
Changes in net interest income and margin result from the interaction of the volume and composition of interest-earning
assets and related yields, interest-bearing liabilities and related rates paid, and noninterest-bearing sources of funding. See the Statistical Information (Unaudited) Average Consolidated Balance Sheet And Net Interest Analysis section of
this Report for additional information.
Net interest income of $2.3 billion for the first quarter of 2012 increased 5 percent compared with the
first quarter of 2011 driven by loans from the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition, organic loan growth and lower funding costs.
The net interest
margin was 3.90% for the first three months of 2012 and 3.94% for the first three months of 2011. The following factors impacted the comparison:
|
|
|
Average loans increased $14.4 billion, or 10 percent. Average commercial loans grew $13.0 billion, or 23 percent, and average consumer loans increased
$2.7 billion, or 5 percent, partially offset by declines in average commercial real estate and residential real estate loans. |
|
|
|
A 26 basis point decrease in the yield on interest-earning assets. The yield on loans, the largest portion of our earning assets, decreased 31 basis
points. |
|
|
|
These factors were partially offset by a weighted-average 25 basis point decline in the rate accrued on interest-bearing liabilities. The rate accrued
on interest-bearing deposits, the largest component, decreased 24 basis points, and the rate on total borrowed funds decreased by 34 basis points. |
We expect our net interest income for full year 2012 to increase in percentage terms by high single digits compared to full year 2011, assuming the economic outlook for the remainder of 2012 will be a
continuation of the recent trends. Approximately $5 billion of higher-cost retail certificates of deposit are scheduled to mature during the second quarter of 2012 at a weighted-average rate of about 2.2%. We expect to retain about half of the
maturing retail certificates of deposit, and we expect those to re-price on average to approximately 30 basis points. In addition, we see future benefits to our funding costs relating to calling certain trust preferred securities. We redeemed $306
million of trust preferred securities with an average rate of 6.2% in April 2012, and in April 2012 we announced that we are calling another $500 million with a current distribution rate of 6.6%. We expect to replace these securities with lower cost
funding. We have an additional $1 billion of trust preferred securities at an average rate of almost 10% with par call dates later this year that potentially could be called.
NONINTEREST INCOME
Noninterest income totaled $1.4
billion for the first three months of 2012 and $1.5 billion for the first three months of 2011. Increases were reflected in higher residential mortgage revenue from higher loan sales revenue, higher asset management fees from improved equity
markets, and an increase in corporate service fees from higher merger and acquisition advisory fees and commercial mortgage banking revenue. These increases were offset by a decline in other income including a decrease in revenue from private and
other equity investments and lower gains on loan sales, and by lower consumer service fees reflecting the regulatory impact of lower interchange fees on debit card transactions.
10 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
Asset management revenue, including BlackRock, increased $21 million to $284 million in the first three
months of 2012 compared with the first three months of 2011. This increase was driven primarily by higher equity earnings from our BlackRock investment. Discretionary assets under management at March 31, 2012 totaled $112 billion compared with
$110 billion at March 31, 2011.
For the first three months of 2012, consumer services fees totaled $264 million compared with $311
million in the first three months of 2011. Lower consumer services fees for the first quarter 2012 reflected the regulatory impact of lower interchange fees on debit card transactions partially offset by higher volumes of customer-initiated
transactions. As further discussed in the Retail Banking section of the Business Segments Review portion of this Financial Review, the Dodd-Frank limits on interchange rates were effective October 1, 2011 and had a negative impact on
revenues of approximately $70 million in the first quarter of 2012. Based on 2012 projected transaction volumes, an additional incremental reduction of approximately $230 million in 2012 revenue is expected.
Corporate services revenue totaled $232 million in the first three months of 2012 and $217 million in the first three months of 2011. Higher merger and
acquisition advisory fees and commercial mortgage banking revenue led to the increase in corporate service fees in the first quarter of 2012.
Residential mortgage revenue totaled $230 million in the first three months of 2012 and $195 million in the first three months of 2011, driven by higher
loans sales revenue, higher net hedging gains on mortgage servicing rights and higher servicing fees.
Service charges on deposits totaled
$127 million for the first three months of 2012 and $123 million for the first three months of 2011. The slight increase in service charges on deposits during the first quarter 2012 related to the impact of the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition during the
quarter.
Net gains on sales of securities totaled $57 million for the first three months of 2012 and $37 million for the first three months
of 2011. The net credit component of OTTI of securities recognized in earnings was a loss of $38 million in the first three months of 2012 compared with a loss of $34 million in the first three months of 2011.
Other noninterest income totaled $285 million for the first three months of 2012 compared with $343 million for the first three months of 2011, largely
related to a decrease in revenue from private and other equity investments and lower gains on loan sales.
Other noninterest income typically
fluctuates from period to period depending on the nature and magnitude of transactions completed. Further details regarding our trading activities are
included in the Market Risk Management Trading Risk portion of the Risk Management section of this Financial Review, further details regarding private and other equity investments are
included in the Market Risk Management-Equity And Other Investment Risk section, and further details regarding gains or losses related to our equity investment in BlackRock are included in the Business Segments Review section.
The growth in our diverse revenue streams is an important component of driving positive operating leverage and should enable us to achieve a solid
performance in an environment that will continue to be affected by regulatory reform headwinds and implementation challenges. Looking to full year 2012, we see further opportunities for growth as a result of our larger franchise, our ability to
cross-sell our products and services to existing clients and our excellent progress in adding new clients. We expect noninterest income to increase in percentage terms by the mid-single digits despite further regulatory impacts on debit card
interchange fees, assuming the economic outlook for 2012 will be a continuation of the 2011 environment.
PRODUCT
REVENUE
In addition to credit and deposit products for commercial customers, Corporate & Institutional Banking
offers other services, including treasury management, capital markets-related products and services, and commercial mortgage banking activities for customers in all business segments. A portion of the revenue and expense related to these products is
reflected in the Corporate & Institutional Banking segment results and the remainder is reflected in the results of other businesses. The Other Information section in the Corporate & Institutional Banking table in the Business
Segments Review section of this Financial Review includes the consolidated revenue to PNC for these services. A discussion of the consolidated revenue from these services follows.
Treasury management revenue, which includes fees as well as net interest income from customer deposit balances, totaled $311 million for the first three months of 2012 and $301 million for the first three
months of 2011. Higher deposit related balances along with strong commercial card growth led to favorable results.
Revenue from capital
markets-related products and services totaled $156 million in the first three months of 2012 compared with $139 million in the first three months of 2011. The increase was primarily due to revenue from higher derivatives and foreign exchange sales
and higher merger and acquisition advisory fees which more than offset a lower level of loan sale activity.
Commercial mortgage banking
activities include revenue derived from commercial mortgage servicing (including net interest income and noninterest income from loan servicing and ancillary services, net of commercial mortgage servicing
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 11
rights amortization, and commercial mortgage servicing rights valuations), and revenue derived from commercial mortgage loans intended for sale and related hedges (including loan origination
fees, net interest income, valuation adjustments and gains or losses on sales).
Commercial mortgage banking activities resulted in revenue of
$43 million in the first three months of 2012 compared with $41 million in the first three months of 2011. Higher revenue from commercial mortgage servicing was partially offset by lower revenue from loan originations.
PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES
The provision for credit losses totaled $185 million for the first three months of 2012 compared with $421 million for the first three months of 2011. The
decline in the comparison was driven by overall credit quality improvement and continuation of actions to reduce exposure levels.
We expect
our provision for credit losses for full year 2012 to improve relative to full year 2011 assuming the economic outlook for the full year 2012 will be a continuation of the 2011 environment and excluding legal and regulatory-related contingencies to
the extent that the nature of the resolution of such contingencies causes us to recognize additional provision.
The Credit Risk Management
portion of the Risk Management section of this Financial Review includes additional information regarding factors impacting the provision for credit losses.
NONINTEREST EXPENSE
Noninterest expense was $2.5 billion for the first three months of 2012 and $2.1 billion for the first three months of 2011. First quarter 2012 expense
included integration costs of $145 million, additions to legal reserves of $72 million, operating expense for the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition of $40 million and $38 million of residential mortgage foreclosure-related expenses.
We expect that total noninterest expense for full year 2012 will increase in percentage terms by mid-to-high single-digits compared to full year 2011.
This expectation is based primarily due to increases in mortgage expenses as a result of higher volumes in the low rate environment and mortgage foreclosure-related matters. This guidance excludes legal and regulatory-related contingencies, charges
for trust preferred securities redemptions and integration expenses for both years.
EFFECTIVE INCOME
TAX RATE
The effective income tax rate was 25.7% in the first three months of 2012 compared with 27.0%
in the first three months of 2011. The lower rate in the first quarter of 2012 was primarily attributable to the impact of higher tax-exempt income and tax credits partially offset by higher levels of pretax income.
12 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
REVIEW
TABLE 3: SUMMARIZED BALANCE
SHEET DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
Mar. 31 2012 |
|
|
Dec. 31 2011 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
176,214 |
|
|
$ |
159,014 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
64,554 |
|
|
|
60,634 |
|
Cash and short-term investments |
|
|
10,256 |
|
|
|
9,992 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
2,456 |
|
|
|
2,936 |
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets |
|
|
11,188 |
|
|
|
10,144 |
|
Equity investments |
|
|
10,352 |
|
|
|
10,134 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
20,863 |
|
|
|
18,351 |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
295,883 |
|
|
$ |
271,205 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
206,127 |
|
|
$ |
187,966 |
|
Borrowed funds |
|
|
42,539 |
|
|
|
36,704 |
|
Other |
|
|
8,981 |
|
|
|
9,289 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
257,647 |
|
|
|
233,959 |
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
35,045 |
|
|
|
34,053 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
3,191 |
|
|
|
3,193 |
|
Total equity |
|
|
38,236 |
|
|
|
37,246 |
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
295,883 |
|
|
$ |
271,205 |
|
The summarized balance sheet data above is based upon our Consolidated Balance Sheet in this Report.
The increase in total assets of $24.7 billion at March 31, 2012 compared with December 31, 2011 was primarily due to the addition of assets
from the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition, loan growth and higher investment securities.
An analysis of changes in selected balance sheet
categories follows.
LOANS
A summary of the major categories of loans outstanding follows. Outstanding loan balances of $176.2 billion at March 31, 2012 and $159.0 billion at December 31, 2011 were net of unearned income,
net deferred loan fees, unamortized discounts and premiums, and purchase discounts and premiums of $3.3 billion at March 31, 2012 and $2.3 billion at December 31, 2011, respectively. The balances do not include future accretable net
interest (i.e., the difference between the undiscounted expected cash flows and the carrying value of the loan) on the purchased impaired loans.
Loans increased $17.2 billion as of March 31, 2012 compared with December 31, 2011. On March 2, 2012, our RBC Bank (USA) acquisition added $14.5 billion of loans, which included $6.4
billion of commercial, $2.5 billion of commercial real estate, $3.4 billion of consumer (including $3.0 billion of home equity loans and $.3 billion of credit card loans), $2.1 billion of residential real estate, and $.1 billion of equipment lease
financing loans. Excluding acquisition
activity, the growth in commercial loans was due to organic growth in the portfolio while the decline in consumer and residential real estate loans was due to loan demand being outpaced by
paydowns, refinancing, and charge-offs.
Loans represented 60% of total assets at March 31, 2012 and 59% of total assets at
December 31, 2011. Commercial lending represented 57% of the loan portfolio at March 31, 2012 and 56% at December 31, 2011. Consumer lending represented 43% at March 31, 2012 and 44% at December 31, 2011.
Commercial real estate loans represented 6% of total assets at both March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
Table 4: Details Of Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
Mar. 31 2012 |
|
|
Dec. 31 2011 |
|
Commercial Lending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail/wholesale trade |
|
$ |
12,983 |
|
|
$ |
11,539 |
|
Manufacturing |
|
|
12,684 |
|
|
|
11,453 |
|
Service providers |
|
|
11,215 |
|
|
|
9,717 |
|
Real estate related (a) |
|
|
10,091 |
|
|
|
8,488 |
|
Financial services |
|
|
8,273 |
|
|
|
6,646 |
|
Health care |
|
|
5,695 |
|
|
|
5,068 |
|
Other industries |
|
|
14,574 |
|
|
|
12,783 |
|
Total commercial |
|
|
75,515 |
|
|
|
65,694 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate projects |
|
|
12,589 |
|
|
|
10,640 |
|
Commercial mortgage |
|
|
5,945 |
|
|
|
5,564 |
|
Total commercial real estate |
|
|
18,534 |
|
|
|
16,204 |
|
Equipment lease financing |
|
|
6,594 |
|
|
|
6,416 |
|
TOTAL COMMERCIAL LENDING |
|
|
100,643 |
|
|
|
88,314 |
|
Consumer Lending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lines of credit |
|
|
24,668 |
|
|
|
22,491 |
|
Installment |
|
|
11,076 |
|
|
|
10,598 |
|
Total home equity |
|
|
35,744 |
|
|
|
33,089 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
15,287 |
|
|
|
13,885 |
|
Residential construction |
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
584 |
|
Total residential real estate |
|
|
16,212 |
|
|
|
14,469 |
|
Credit card |
|
|
4,089 |
|
|
|
3,976 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Education |
|
|
9,246 |
|
|
|
9,582 |
|
Automobile |
|
|
5,794 |
|
|
|
5,181 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,486 |
|
|
|
4,403 |
|
Total other consumer |
|
|
19,526 |
|
|
|
19,166 |
|
TOTAL CONSUMER LENDING |
|
|
75,571 |
|
|
|
70,700 |
|
Total loans (b) |
|
$ |
176,214 |
|
|
$ |
159,014 |
|
(a) |
Includes loans to customers in the real estate and construction industries. |
(b) |
Construction loans with interest reserves, and A/B Note restructurings are not significant to PNC.
|
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 13
Total loans above include purchased impaired loans of $8.4 billion, or 5% of total loans, at March 31,
2012, and $6.7 billion, or 4% of total loans, at December 31, 2011. The increase is related to the addition of purchased impaired loans from the RBC (USA) acquisition.
We are committed to providing credit and liquidity to qualified borrowers. Total loan originations and new commitments and renewals totaled $35 billion for the first three months of 2012.
Our loan portfolio continued to be diversified among numerous industries and types of businesses in our principal geographic markets.
Commercial lending is the largest category and is the most sensitive to changes in assumptions and judgments underlying the determination of the
allowance for loan and lease losses (ALLL). This estimate also considers other relevant factors such as:
|
|
|
Industry concentrations and conditions, |
|
|
|
Recent credit quality trends, |
|
|
|
Recent loss experience in particular portfolios, |
|
|
|
Recent macro economic factors,
|
|
|
|
Changes in risk selection and underwriting standards, and |
|
|
|
Timing of available information. |
Higher Risk Loans
Our loan portfolio includes certain loans deemed to be higher
risk and therefore more likely to result in credit losses. As of March 31, 2012, we established specific and pooled reserves on the total commercial lending category of $1.9 billion. This commercial lending reserve included what we believe to
be appropriate loss coverage on the higher risk commercial loans in the total commercial portfolio. The commercial lending reserve represented 46% of the total ALLL of $4.2 billion at that date. The remaining 54% of ALLL pertained to the total
consumer lending category, including loans with certain attributes that we would consider to be higher risk. We do not consider government insured or guaranteed loans to be higher risk as defaults are materially mitigated by payments of insurance or
guarantee amounts for approved claims. Additional information regarding our higher risk loans is included in Note 5 Asset Quality and Allowances for Loan and Lease Losses and Unfunded Loan Commitments and Letters of Credit in our Notes To
Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Report.
Purchase Accounting, Accretion
and Valuation for Purchased Impaired Loans
Table 5: RBC Acquired Loan Portfolio on March 2,
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased Impaired |
|
|
Other Purchased Loans (a) |
|
In millions |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Outstanding
Balance |
|
|
Net Investment |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Outstanding
Balance (b) |
|
|
Net Investment |
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
446 |
|
|
$ |
746 |
|
|
|
60 |
% |
|
$ |
6,002 |
|
|
$ |
6,328 |
|
|
|
95 |
% |
Commercial Real Estate |
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
836 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
2,067 |
|
|
|
2,310 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
Equipment Lease Financing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
3,203 |
|
|
|
3,731 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
Residential Real Estate |
|
|
896 |
|
|
|
1,214 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
|
1,202 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,974 |
|
|
$ |
3,011 |
|
|
|
66 |
% |
|
$ |
12,526 |
|
|
$ |
13,663 |
|
|
|
92 |
% |
(a) |
Other purchased loans includes revolving loans that are excluded from the purchased impaired loans. |
(b) |
The difference between total outstanding balance and total fair value will be accreted into net interest income on a constant effective yield over the life of the loans
unless future credit events cause the loans to be on nonaccrual. |
Information related to purchase accounting, accretion and valuation for purchased impaired loans for the
first three months of 2012 and 2011 follows.
Table 6: Accretion Purchased Impaired Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 In millions |
|
2012 (a) |
|
|
2011 (b) |
|
Impaired loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scheduled accretion |
|
$ |
158 |
|
|
$ |
160 |
|
Reversal of contractual interest on impaired loans |
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
(106 |
) |
Scheduled accretion net of contractual interest |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Excess cash recoveries |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
Total impaired loans |
|
$ |
101 |
|
|
$ |
135 |
|
(a) |
Represents National City and RBC acquisitions. |
(b) |
Represents National City acquisition.
|
Table 7: Accretable Net Interest Purchased Impaired Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In billions |
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
January 1 |
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
Addition due to RBC acquisition on March 2, 2012 |
|
|
.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion |
|
|
(.2 |
) |
|
|
(.2 |
) |
Excess cash recoveries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.1 |
) |
Net reclassifications to accretable from non-accretable and other
activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
.3 |
|
March 31 (a) |
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
(a) |
As of March 31, 2012, we estimate that the reversal of contractual interest on purchased impaired loans will total approximately $1.5 billion in future periods, of
which $250 million was associated with loans purchased in the RBC acquisition. This will offset the total net accretable interest in future interest income of $2.5 billion on purchased impaired loans.
|
14 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
Table 8: Valuation of Purchased Impaired Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2012 (a) |
|
|
December 31, 2011 (b) |
|
Dollars in billions |
|
Balance |
|
|
Net Investment |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Net Investment |
|
Commercial and commercial real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid principal balance |
|
$ |
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased impaired mark |
|
|
(.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Recorded investment |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net investment |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
63 |
% |
|
|
.7 |
|
|
|
70 |
% |
Consumer and residential mortgage loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid principal balance |
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased impaired mark |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Recorded investment |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net investment |
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
77 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
77 |
% |
Total purchased impaired loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid principal balance |
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased impaired mark |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Recorded investment |
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net investment |
|
$ |
7.4 |
|
|
|
73 |
% |
|
$ |
5.7 |
|
|
|
76 |
% |
(a) |
Represents National City and RBC acquisitions. |
(b) |
Represents National City acquisition. |
The unpaid principal balance of purchased impaired loans increased from $7.5 billion at December 31,
2011 to $10.1 billion at March 31, 2012 due to the acquisition of RBC Bank (USA) and related credit card portfolio, partially offset by payments, disposals, and charge-offs of amounts determined to be uncollectible. The remaining purchased
impaired mark at March 31, 2012 was $1.7 billion, which was an increase from $0.8 billion at December 31, 2011. The associated allowance for loan losses remained flat at March 31, 2012. The net investment of $5.7 billion at
December 31, 2011 also increased 30% to $7.4 billion at March 31, 2012. At March 31, 2012, our largest individual purchased impaired loan had a recorded investment of $21.8 million.
We currently expect to collect total cash flows of $9.9 billion on purchased impaired loans, representing the $7.4 billion net investment at
March 31, 2012 and the accretable net interest of $2.5 billion shown in the Accretable Net Interest-Purchased Impaired Loans table. These represent the net future cash flows on purchased impaired loans, as contractual interest will be reversed.
Net Unfunded Credit Commitments
Net unfunded credit commitments are comprised of the following:
Table 9: Net Unfunded Credit Commitments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
March 31 2012 |
|
|
December 31 2011 |
|
Commercial/commercial real estate (a) |
|
$ |
69,941 |
|
|
$ |
64,955 |
|
Home equity lines of credit |
|
|
20,751 |
|
|
|
18,317 |
|
Credit card |
|
|
17,610 |
|
|
|
16,216 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,152 |
|
|
|
3,783 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
112,454 |
|
|
$ |
103,271 |
|
(a) |
Less than 4% of these amounts at each date relate to commercial real estate. |
Commitments to extend credit represent arrangements to lend funds or provide liquidity subject to specified contractual conditions. Commercial commitments reported above exclude syndications, assignments
and participations, primarily to financial institutions, totaling $20.9 billion at March 31, 2012 and $20.2 billion at December 31, 2011.
Unfunded liquidity facility commitments and standby bond purchase agreements totaled $903 million at March 31, 2012 and $742 million at December 31, 2011 and are included in the preceding table
primarily within the Commercial / commercial real estate category.
In addition to the credit commitments set forth in the table above, our
net outstanding standby letters of credit totaled $10.9 billion at March 31, 2012 and $10.8 billion at December 31, 2011. Standby letters of credit commit us to make payments on behalf of our customers if specified future events occur.
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 15
INVESTMENT SECURITIES
Table 10: Details of Investment Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
March 31, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Treasury and government agencies |
|
$ |
2,567 |
|
|
$ |
2,842 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency |
|
|
28,493 |
|
|
|
29,298 |
|
Non-agency |
|
|
6,791 |
|
|
|
6,121 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency |
|
|
865 |
|
|
|
899 |
|
Non-agency |
|
|
2,805 |
|
|
|
2,943 |
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
5,417 |
|
|
|
5,283 |
|
State and municipal |
|
|
1,899 |
|
|
|
1,936 |
|
Other debt |
|
|
3,647 |
|
|
|
3,738 |
|
Corporate stocks and other |
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
298 |
|
Total securities available for sale |
|
$ |
52,782 |
|
|
$ |
53,358 |
|
SECURITIES HELD TO MATURITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Treasury and government agencies |
|
$ |
224 |
|
|
$ |
246 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed (agency) |
|
|
4,450 |
|
|
|
4,590 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency |
|
|
1,301 |
|
|
|
1,357 |
|
Non-agency |
|
|
3,223 |
|
|
|
3,334 |
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
967 |
|
|
|
977 |
|
State and municipal |
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
704 |
|
Other debt |
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
373 |
|
Total securities held to maturity |
|
$ |
11,196 |
|
|
$ |
11,581 |
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Treasury and government agencies |
|
$ |
3,369 |
|
|
$ |
3,717 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency |
|
|
26,081 |
|
|
|
26,792 |
|
Non-agency |
|
|
6,673 |
|
|
|
5,557 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency |
|
|
1,101 |
|
|
|
1,140 |
|
Non-agency |
|
|
2,693 |
|
|
|
2,756 |
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
3,854 |
|
|
|
3,669 |
|
State and municipal |
|
|
1,779 |
|
|
|
1,807 |
|
Other debt |
|
|
2,691 |
|
|
|
2,762 |
|
Corporate stocks and other |
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
Total securities available for sale |
|
$ |
48,609 |
|
|
$ |
48,568 |
|
SECURITIES HELD TO MATURITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Treasury and government agencies |
|
$ |
221 |
|
|
$ |
261 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed (agency) |
|
|
4,761 |
|
|
|
4,891 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency |
|
|
1,332 |
|
|
|
1,382 |
|
Non-agency |
|
|
3,467 |
|
|
|
3,573 |
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
1,251 |
|
|
|
1,262 |
|
State and municipal |
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
702 |
|
Other debt |
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
379 |
|
Total securities held to maturity |
|
$ |
12,066 |
|
|
$ |
12,450 |
|
The carrying amount of investment securities totaled $64.6 billion at March 31, 2012, an increase of
$3.9 billion, or 6%, from $60.6 billion at December 31, 2011. The increase reflected higher agency residential mortgage-backed securities from net purchase activity and asset-backed and other debt securities added in the RBC Bank (USA)
acquisition. Investment securities represented 22% of total assets at both March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
We evaluate our
portfolio of investment securities in light of changing market conditions and other factors and, where appropriate, take steps intended to improve our overall positioning. We consider the portfolio to be well-diversified and of high quality. US
Treasury and government agencies, agency residential mortgage-backed and agency commercial mortgage-backed securities collectively represented 60% of the investment securities portfolio at March 31, 2012.
At March 31, 2012, the securities available for sale portfolio included a net unrealized gain of $576 million, which represented the difference
between fair value and amortized cost. The comparable amount at December 31, 2011 was a net unrealized loss of $41 million. The fair value of investment securities is impacted by interest rates, credit spreads, market volatility and liquidity
conditions. The fair value of investment securities generally decreases when interest rates increase and vice versa. In addition, the fair value generally decreases when credit spreads widen and vice versa.
The improvement in the net unrealized gain as compared with a loss at December 31, 2011 was primarily due to the effect of higher valuations of
non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities. Net unrealized gains and losses in the securities available for sale portfolio are included in shareholders equity as accumulated other comprehensive income or loss from continuing operations,
net of tax.
Unrealized gains and losses on available for sale securities do not impact liquidity or risk-based capital. However, reductions
in the credit ratings of these securities could have an impact on the liquidity of the securities or the determination of risk-weighted assets which could reduce our regulatory capital ratios. In addition, the amount representing the credit-related
portion of OTTI on available for sale securities would reduce our earnings and regulatory capital ratios.
The expected weighted-average life
of investment securities (excluding corporate stocks and other) was 3.7 years at March 31, 2012 and 3.7 years at December 31, 2011.
We estimate that, at March 31, 2012, the effective duration of investment securities was 2.7 years for an immediate 50 basis points parallel
increase in interest rates and 2.5 years for an immediate 50 basis points parallel decrease in interest rates. Comparable amounts at December 31, 2011 were 2.6 years and 2.4 years, respectively.
16 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
The following table provides detail regarding the vintage, current credit rating, and FICO score of the
underlying collateral at origination, where available, for residential mortgage-backed, commercial mortgage-backed and other asset-backed securities held in the available for sale and held to maturity portfolios:
Table 11: Vintage, Current Credit Rating, and FICO Score for Asset-Backed Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2012 |
|
|
|
Agency |
|
|
Non-agency |
|
|
|
|
Dollars in millions |
|
Residential Mortgage- Backed Securities |
|
|
Commercial Mortgage- Backed Securities |
|
|
Residential Mortgage- Backed Securities |
|
|
Commercial Mortgage- Backed Securities |
|
|
Asset- Backed Securities |
|
Fair Value Available for Sale |
|
$ |
29,298 |
|
|
$ |
899 |
|
|
$ |
6,121 |
|
|
$ |
2,943 |
|
|
$ |
5,283 |
|
Fair Value Held to Maturity |
|
|
4,590 |
|
|
|
1,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,334 |
|
|
|
977 |
|
Total Fair Value |
|
$ |
33,888 |
|
|
$ |
2,256 |
|
|
$ |
6,121 |
|
|
$ |
6,277 |
|
|
$ |
6,260 |
|
% of Fair Value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By Vintage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
2009 |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
2008 |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
% |
2007 |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
2006 |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
2005 and earlier |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
53 |
% |
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
Not Available |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
71 |
% |
Total |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
By Credit Rating (at March 31, 2012) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
77 |
% |
|
|
57 |
% |
AA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
BBB |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
BB |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
% |
Lower than B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
% |
No rating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
Total |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
By FICO Score (at origination) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
% |
<720 and >660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
% |
<660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
% |
No FICO score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
% |
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
We conduct a comprehensive security-level impairment assessment quarterly on all securities in an
unrealized loss position to determine whether the loss represents OTTI. Our assessment considers the security structure, recent security collateral performance metrics, external credit ratings, failure of the issuer to make scheduled interest or
principal payments, our judgment and expectations of future performance, and relevant independent industry research, analysis and forecasts.
We also consider the severity of the impairment and the length of time that the security has been impaired in our assessment. Results of the periodic
assessment are reviewed by a cross-functional senior management team representing Asset &
Liability Management, Finance, and Market Risk Management. The senior management team considers the results of the assessments, as well as other factors, in determining whether the impairment is
other-than-temporary.
We recognize the credit portion of OTTI charges in current earnings for those debt securities where we do not intend to
sell and believe we will not be required to sell the securities prior to expected recovery. The noncredit portion of OTTI is included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Also see our Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income.
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 17
We recognized OTTI for the first three months of 2012 and 2011 as follows:
Table 12: Other-Than-Temporary Impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
|
|
In millions |
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Credit portion of OTTI losses (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-agency residential mortgage-backed |
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Other debt |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Total credit portion of OTTI losses |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
Noncredit portion of OTTI (recoveries) (b) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
Total OTTI losses |
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
(a) |
Reduction of noninterest income in our Consolidated Income Statement. |
(b) |
Included in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. Also see our Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income.
|
The following table summarizes net
unrealized gains and losses recorded on non-agency residential and commercial mortgage-backed and other asset-backed securities, which represent our most significant categories of securities not backed by the US government or its agencies. A summary
of all OTTI credit losses recognized for the first three months of 2012 by investment type is included in Note 7 Investment Securities in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in this Report.
Table 13: Net Unrealized Gains and Losses on Non-Agency Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2012 |
|
In millions |
|
Residential Mortgage- Backed Securities |
|
|
Commercial Mortgage- Backed Securities |
|
|
Asset-Backed
Securities (a) |
|
Available for Sale Securities (Non-Agency) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Net Unrealized Gain |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
|
Credit Rating Analysis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA |
|
$ |
91 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1,708 |
|
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
2,897 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
Other Investment Grade (AA, A, BBB) |
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
1,033 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
1,715 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
Total Investment Grade |
|
|
637 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
2,741 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
4,612 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
BB |
|
|
734 |
|
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B |
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Lower than B |
|
|
4,333 |
|
|
|
(557 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
(107 |
) |
Total Sub-Investment Grade |
|
|
5,451 |
|
|
|
(663 |
) |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
(112 |
) |
Total No Rating |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
Total |
|
$ |
6,121 |
|
|
$ |
(670 |
) |
|
$ |
2,943 |
|
|
$ |
138 |
|
|
$ |
5,280 |
|
|
$ |
(134 |
) |
OTTI Analysis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Grade: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTTI has been recognized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No OTTI recognized to date |
|
$ |
637 |
|
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
$ |
2,741 |
|
|
$ |
134 |
|
|
$ |
4,612 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
Total Investment Grade |
|
|
637 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
2,741 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
4,612 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Sub-Investment Grade: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTTI has been recognized |
|
|
3,565 |
|
|
|
(623 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
(125 |
) |
No OTTI recognized to date |
|
|
1,886 |
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Total Sub-Investment Grade |
|
|
5,451 |
|
|
|
(663 |
) |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
(112 |
) |
No Rating: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTTI has been recognized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
No OTTI recognized to date |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total No Rating |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
Total |
|
$ |
6,121 |
|
|
$ |
(670 |
) |
|
$ |
2,943 |
|
|
$ |
138 |
|
|
$ |
5,280 |
|
|
$ |
(134 |
) |
Securities Held to Maturity (Non-Agency) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Rating Analysis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,122 |
|
|
$ |
101 |
|
|
$ |
654 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
Other Investment Grade (AA, A, BBB) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Total Investment Grade |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,334 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
866 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
BB |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Lower than B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Sub-Investment Grade |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total No Rating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,334 |
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
971 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
(a) |
Excludes $3 million and $6 million of available for sale and held to maturity agency asset-backed securities, respectively. |
18 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities
At March 31, 2012, our residential mortgage-backed securities portfolio was comprised of $33.9 billion fair value of US government agency-backed securities and $6.1 billion fair value of non-agency
(private issuer) securities. The agency securities are generally collateralized by 1-4 family, conforming, fixed-rate residential mortgages. The non-agency securities are also generally collateralized by 1-4 family residential mortgages. The
mortgage loans underlying the non-agency securities are generally non-conforming (i.e., original balances in excess of the amount qualifying for agency securities) and predominately have interest rates that are fixed for a period of time, after
which the rate adjusts to a floating rate based upon a contractual spread that is indexed to a market rate (i.e., a hybrid ARM), or interest rates that are fixed for the term of the loan.
Substantially all of the non-agency securities are senior tranches in the securitization structure and at origination had credit protection in the form
of credit enhancement, over-collateralization and/or excess spread accounts.
During the first three months of 2012, we recorded OTTI credit
losses of $32 million on non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities. All of the losses were associated with securities rated below investment grade. As of March 31, 2012, the noncredit portion of OTTI losses recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive income for non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities totaled $623 million and the related securities had a fair value of $3.6 billion.
The fair value of sub-investment grade investment securities for which we have not recorded an OTTI credit loss as of March 31, 2012 totaled $1.9 billion, with unrealized net losses of $40 million.
The results of our security-level assessments indicate that we will recover the entire cost basis of these securities. Note 7 Investment Securities in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in this Report provides further detail regarding
our process for assessing OTTI for these securities.
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities
The fair value of the non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities portfolio was $6.3 billion at March 31, 2012 and consisted of fixed-rate,
private-issuer securities collateralized by non-residential properties, primarily retail properties, office buildings, and multi-family housing. The agency commercial mortgage-backed securities portfolio was $2.3 billion fair value at March 31,
2012 consisting of multi-family housing. Substantially all of the securities are the most senior tranches in the subordination structure.
There were no OTTI credit losses on commercial mortgage-backed securities during the first three months of 2012.
Asset-Backed Securities
The fair value
of the asset-backed securities portfolio was $6.3 billion at March 31, 2012 and consisted of fixed-rate and
floating-rate, private-issuer securities collateralized primarily by various consumer credit products, including residential mortgage loans, credit cards, automobile loans, and student loans.
Substantially all of the securities are senior tranches in the securitization structure and have credit protection in the form of credit enhancement, over-collateralization and/or excess spread accounts.
We recorded OTTI credit losses of $5 million on asset-backed securities during the first three months of 2012. All of the securities are collateralized
by first and second lien residential mortgage loans and are rated below investment grade. As of March 31, 2012, the noncredit portion of OTTI losses recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income for asset-backed securities totaled $144
million and the related securities had a fair value of $587 million.
For the sub-investment grade investment securities (available for sale
and held to maturity) for which we have not recorded an OTTI loss through March 31, 2012, the remaining fair value was $86 million, with unrealized net gains of $13 million. The results of our security-level assessments indicate that we will
recover the cost basis of these securities. Note 7 Investment Securities in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in this Report provides further detail regarding our process for assessing OTTI for these securities.
If current housing and economic conditions were to worsen, and if market volatility and illiquidity were to worsen, or if market interest rates were to
increase appreciably, the valuation of our investment securities portfolio could continue to be adversely affected and we could incur additional OTTI credit losses that would impact our Consolidated Income Statement.
Table 14: Loans Held For Sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
March 31 2012 |
|
|
December 31 2011 |
|
Commercial mortgages at fair value |
|
$ |
840 |
|
|
$ |
843 |
|
Commercial mortgages at lower of cost or fair value |
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
Total commercial mortgages |
|
|
1,014 |
|
|
|
1,294 |
|
Residential mortgages |
|
|
1,387 |
|
|
|
1,522 |
|
Other |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,456 |
|
|
$ |
2,936 |
|
We stopped originating certain commercial mortgage loans designated as held for sale in 2008 and continue pursuing
opportunities to reduce these positions at appropriate prices. We sold $10 million in unpaid principal balance of these commercial mortgage loans held for sale carried at fair value in the first three months of 2012 and sold $16 million in the first
three months of 2011.
We recognized total net losses of $3 million in the first three months of 2012 on the valuation and sale of commercial
mortgage loans held for sale, net of hedges. Net gains of $13
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 19
million on the valuation and sale of commercial mortgage loans held for sale, net of hedges, were recognized in the first three months of 2011.
Residential mortgage loan origination volume was $3.4 billion in the first three months of 2012 compared to $3.2 billion for the first three months of
2011. Substantially all such loans were originated under agency or Federal Housing Administration (FHA) standards.
We sold $3.5 billion of
loans and recognized related gains of $109 million during the first three months of 2012. The comparable amounts for the first three months of 2011 were $3.4 billion and $84 million, respectively.
Interest income on loans held for sale was $50 million in the first three months of 2012, and $69 million in the first three months of 2011. These
amounts are included in Other interest income on our Consolidated Income Statement.
GOODWILL AND
OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill and other intangible assets totaled $11.2 billion at
March 31, 2012 and $10.1 billion at December 31, 2011. During the first three months of 2012, PNC recorded goodwill of $954 million and other intangible assets of $180 million associated with the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition. See Note 2
Acquisition and Divestiture Activity and Note 9 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets included in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in this Report.
FUNDING AND CAPITAL SOURCES
Table 15: Details Of Funding Sources
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
March 31 2012 |
|
|
December 31 2011 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market |
|
$ |
99,481 |
|
|
$ |
89,912 |
|
Demand |
|
|
65,086 |
|
|
|
57,717 |
|
Retail certificates of deposit |
|
|
29,342 |
|
|
|
29,518 |
|
Savings |
|
|
9,945 |
|
|
|
8,705 |
|
Time deposits in foreign offices and other time |
|
|
2,273 |
|
|
|
2,114 |
|
Total deposits |
|
|
206,127 |
|
|
|
187,966 |
|
Borrowed funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements |
|
|
4,832 |
|
|
|
2,984 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings |
|
|
8,957 |
|
|
|
6,967 |
|
Bank notes and senior debt |
|
|
12,065 |
|
|
|
11,793 |
|
Subordinated debt |
|
|
8,221 |
|
|
|
8,321 |
|
Other |
|
|
8,464 |
|
|
|
6,639 |
|
Total borrowed funds |
|
|
42,539 |
|
|
|
36,704 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
248,666 |
|
|
$ |
224,670 |
|
Total funding sources increased $24.0 billion at March 31, 2012 compared with December 31, 2011.
Total deposits increased $18.2 billion, or 10%, at March 31, 2012 compared with December 31,
2011. On March 2, 2012, our RBC Bank (USA) acquisition added $18.1 billion of deposits, including $6.9 billion of money market, $6.7 billion of demand deposit, $4.1 billion of retail certificate of deposit, and $.4 billion of savings accounts.
Excluding acquisition activity, money market, demand deposits and savings accounts increased for the three months ended March 31, 2012, partially offset by the redemption of retail certificates of deposit. Interest-bearing deposits represented
70% of total deposits at March 31, 2012 compared to 69% at December 31, 2011. Total borrowed funds increased $5.8 billion since December 31, 2011. The change from December 31, 2011 was due to an increase in Federal funds
purchased and repurchase agreements along with an increase in FHLB borrowings and commercial paper, partially offset by repayments and maturities.
Capital
See 2012 Capital and Liquidity Actions in the Executive Summary section of
this Financial Review for additional information regarding our upcoming May 2012 redemption of trust preferred securities, our plans to purchase shares under PNCs existing common stock repurchase program (described below) during the remainder
of 2012, our April 2012 increase to PNCs quarterly common stock dividend, redemption of trust preferred securities and issuance of preferred securities, and our March 2012 issuance of senior notes.
We manage our capital position by making adjustments to our balance sheet size and composition, issuing debt, equity or hybrid instruments, executing
treasury stock transactions, managing dividend policies and retaining earnings.
Total shareholders equity increased $1.0 billion, to
$35.0 billion, at March 31, 2012 compared with December 31, 2011 as retained earnings increased $0.6 billion. Accumulated other comprehensive income increased $.4 billion, to $.3 billion, at March 31, 2012 compared with a loss of $.1
billion at December 31, 2011 due to net unrealized gains on securities and lower OTTI losses on debt securities. Common shares outstanding were 528 million at March 31, 2012 and 527 million at December 31, 2011.
Our current common stock repurchase program permits us to purchase up to 25 million shares of PNC common stock on the open market or in privately
negotiated transactions. This program will remain in effect until fully utilized or until modified, superseded or terminated. The extent and timing of share repurchases under this program will depend on a number of factors including, among others,
market and general economic conditions, economic and regulatory capital considerations, alternative uses of capital, regulatory and contractual limitations, and the potential impact on our credit ratings. We did not purchase any shares in the first
three months of 2012 under this program.
20 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
Table 16: Risk-Based Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars in millions |
|
March 31 2012 |
|
|
December 31 2011 |
|
Capital components |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
$ |
33,409 |
|
|
$ |
32,417 |
|
Preferred |
|
|
1,636 |
|
|
|
1,636 |
|
Trust preferred capital securities |
|
|
2,302 |
|
|
|
2,354 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
1,356 |
|
|
|
1,351 |
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets |
|
|
(10,036 |
) |
|
|
(9,027 |
) |
Eligible deferred income taxes on goodwill and other intangible assets |
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
431 |
|
Pension, other postretirement benefit plan adjustments |
|
|
724 |
|
|
|
755 |
|
Net unrealized securities (gains) losses, after-tax |
|
|
(365 |
) |
|
|
41 |
|
Net unrealized gains on cash flow hedge derivatives, after-tax |
|
|
(660 |
) |
|
|
(717 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(157 |
) |
|
|
(168 |
) |
Tier 1 risk-based capital |
|
|
28,587 |
|
|
|
29,073 |
|
Subordinated debt |
|
|
4,327 |
|
|
|
4,571 |
|
Eligible allowance for credit losses |
|
|
3,152 |
|
|
|
2,904 |
|
Total risk-based capital |
|
$ |
36,066 |
|
|
$ |
36,548 |
|
Tier 1 common capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 risk-based capital |
|
$ |
28,587 |
|
|
$ |
29,073 |
|
Preferred equity |
|
|
(1,636 |
) |
|
|
(1,636 |
) |
Trust preferred capital securities |
|
|
(2,302 |
) |
|
|
(2,354 |
) |
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(1,356 |
) |
|
|
(1,351 |
) |
Tier 1 common capital |
|
$ |
23,293 |
|
|
$ |
23,732 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-weighted assets, including off-balance sheet instruments and market risk equivalent assets |
|
$ |
250,873 |
|
|
$ |
230,705 |
|
Adjusted average total assets |
|
|
271,382 |
|
|
|
261,958 |
|
Capital ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 common |
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
|
10.3 |
% |
Tier 1 risk-based |
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
Total risk-based |
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
Leverage |
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
Federal banking regulators have stated that they expect all bank holding companies to have a level and composition of
Tier 1 capital well in excess of the 4% regulatory minimum, and they have required the largest US bank holding companies, including PNC, to have a capital buffer sufficient to withstand losses and allow them to meet credit needs of their customers
through estimated stress scenarios. They have
also stated their view that common equity should be the dominant form of Tier 1 capital. As a result, regulators are now emphasizing the Tier 1 common capital ratio in their evaluation of bank
holding company capital levels, although a formal ratio for this metric is not provided for in current regulations. We seek to manage our capital consistent with these regulatory principles, and believe that our March 31, 2012 capital levels
were aligned with them.
Dodd-Frank requires the Federal Reserve Board to establish capital requirements that would, among other things,
eliminate the Tier 1 treatment of trust preferred securities following a phase-in period expected to begin in 2013. Accordingly, PNC will evaluate its alternatives, including the potential for redemption on the first call date of some or all of its
trust preferred securities, based on such considerations it may consider relevant, including dividend rates, the specifics of the future capital requirements, capital market conditions and other factors. See 2012 Capital and Liquidity Actions in the
Executive Summary section of this Financial Review for additional information regarding our April 2012 and upcoming May 2012 redemptions of trust preferred securities. PNC is also subject to replacement capital covenants with respect to certain of
its trust preferred securities. See Note 13 Capital Securities of Subsidiary Trusts and Perpetual Trust Securities in Item 8 of our 2011 Form 10-K and Note 10 Capital Securities of Subsidiary Trusts and Perpetual Trust Securities in the Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements in this Report for additional information on trust preferred securities.
Our Tier 1 common capital ratio
was 9.3% at March 31, 2012, compared with 10.3% at December 31, 2011. Our Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio decreased 120 basis points to 11.4% at March 31, 2012 from 12.6% at December 31, 2011. Our total risk-based capital ratio
declined 140 basis points to 14.4% at March 31, 2012 from 15.8% at December 31, 2011. The decline in these ratios was primarily due to an increase in goodwill and risk-weighted assets as a result of the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition.
At March 31, 2012, PNC and PNC Bank, National Association (PNC Bank), our domestic bank subsidiary, were both considered well
capitalized based on US regulatory capital ratio requirements under Basel I. To qualify as well-capitalized, regulators currently require bank holding companies and banks to maintain capital ratios of at least 6% for Tier 1
risk-based, 10% for total risk-based, and 5% for leverage. We believe PNC and PNC Bank will continue to meet these requirements during the remainder of 2012.
The access to, and cost of, funding for new business initiatives including acquisitions, the ability to engage in expanded business activities, the ability to pay dividends, the level of deposit insurance
costs, and the level and nature of regulatory oversight depend, in part, on a financial institutions capital strength.
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 21
We provide additional information regarding enhanced capital requirements and some of their potential
impacts on PNC in Item 1A Risk Factors included in our 2011 Form 10-K.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS AND
VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
We engage in a variety of activities that involve unconsolidated
entities or that are otherwise not reflected in our Consolidated Balance Sheet that are generally referred to as off-balance sheet arrangements. Additional information on these types of activities is included in our 2011 Form 10-K and in
the following sections of this Report:
|
|
|
Commitments, including contractual obligations and other commitments, included within the Risk Management section of this Financial Review,
|
|
|
|
Note 3 Loan Sale and Servicing Activities and Variable Interest Entities in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements,
|
|
|
|
Note 10 Capital Securities of Subsidiary Trusts and Perpetual Trust Securities in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements, and
|
|
|
|
Note 17 Commitments and Guarantees in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements. |
PNC consolidates variable interest entities (VIEs) when we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is determined to be
the party that meets both of the following criteria: (1) has the power to make decisions that most significantly affect the economic performance of the VIE and (2) has the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that
in either case could potentially be significant to the VIE.
A summary of VIEs, including those that we have consolidated and those in which
we hold variable interests but have not consolidated into our financial statements, as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 is included in Note 3 of this Report.
Trust Preferred Securities
In connection with the $950 million in principal amount of junior subordinated debentures associated with the trust preferred securities issued by PNC Capital Trusts C, D and E, as well as in connection
with the obligations that remain outstanding assumed by PNC with respect to $1.7 billion in principal amount of junior subordinated debentures issued by acquired entities in association with trust preferred securities issued by various subsidiary
statutory trusts, we are subject to certain restrictions, including restrictions on dividend payments. Generally, if there is (i) an event of default under the debentures, (ii) PNC elects to defer interest on the debentures, (iii) PNC
exercises its right to defer payments on the related trust preferred securities issued by the statutory trusts, or (iv) there is a default under PNCs guarantee of such payment obligations, as specified in the applicable governing
documents, then PNC would be subject during the period of such default or deferral to restrictions on dividends and other provisions protecting the status of the debenture holders similar to or in some ways more restrictive than those potentially
imposed under the Exchange Agreements with Trust II and Trust III, as described in Note 13 Capital Securities of Subsidiary Trusts and Perpetual Trust Securities in our 2011 Form 10-K. See 2012 Capital and Liquidity Actions in the Executive Summary
section of this Financial Review for additional information regarding our April 2012 and upcoming May 2012 redemptions of trust preferred securities.
Also, in connection with the Trust E Securities sale, we are subject to a replacement capital covenant, which is described in Note 13 in our 2011 Form 10-K. Effective April 25, 2012, PNCs 6
7/8% Subordinated Notes due May 15, 2019 became the covered debt with respect to and in accordance with the terms of this replacement capital covenant because the 6.125% Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures issued by PNC to PNC
Capital Trust D, which had been the covered debt under this replacement capital covenant, were redeemed in connection with the redemption of the trust preferred securities issued by PNC Capital Trust D.
22 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
In addition to the following, see Note 8 Fair Value in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in this Report for further
information regarding fair value.
Assets recorded at fair value represented 24% of total assets at March 31, 2012 and 25% at
December 31, 2011. Liabilities recorded at fair value represented 3% of total liabilities at March 31, 2012 and 4% at December 31, 2011.
The following table includes the assets and liabilities measured at fair value and the portion of such assets and liabilities that are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.
Table 17: Fair Value Measurements Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2012 |
|
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
In millions |
|
Total Fair Value |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total Fair Value |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale |
|
$ |
53,358 |
|
|
$ |
7,264 |
|
|
$ |
48,568 |
|
|
$ |
6,729 |
|
Financial derivatives |
|
|
8,703 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
9,463 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
Residential mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
1,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities |
|
|
2,639 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
2,513 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Residential mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
724 |
|
|
|
724 |
|
|
|
647 |
|
|
|
647 |
|
Commercial mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
843 |
|
|
|
843 |
|
Equity investments |
|
|
1,522 |
|
|
|
1,522 |
|
|
|
1,504 |
|
|
|
1,504 |
|
Customer resale agreements |
|
|
688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
732 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
70,817 |
|
|
$ |
10,727 |
|
|
$ |
66,658 |
|
|
$ |
10,051 |
|
Level 3 assets as a percentage of total assets at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
% |
Level 3 assets as a percentage of consolidated assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
% |
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial derivatives |
|
$ |
6,961 |
|
|
$ |
334 |
|
|
$ |
7,606 |
|
|
$ |
308 |
|
Trading securities sold short |
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
7,501 |
|
|
$ |
334 |
|
|
$ |
8,625 |
|
|
$ |
308 |
|
Level 3 liabilities as a percentage of total liabilities at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
% |
Level 3 liabilities as a percentage of consolidated liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
<1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
<1 |
% |
The majority of Level 3 assets represent non-agency residential mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities in the
available for sale securities portfolio for which there was limited market activity.
An instruments categorization within the hierarchy
is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. PNC reviews and updates fair value hierarchy classifications quarterly. Changes from one quarter to the next related to the observability of inputs to a fair
value measurement may result in a reclassification (transfer) of assets or liabilities between hierarchy levels. During the first three months of 2012 there were transfers of assets and liabilities from Level 2 to Level 3 of $460 million consisting
primarily of mortgage-backed securities as a result of a ratings downgrade which reduced the observability of valuation inputs. During the first three months of 2012 and 2011 there were no other material transfers of assets or liabilities between
the hierarchy levels.
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 23
BUSINESS SEGMENTS REVIEW
We have six reportable business segments:
|
|
|
Corporate & Institutional Banking |
|
|
|
Residential Mortgage Banking |
|
|
|
Non-Strategic Assets Portfolio |
Business segment results, including inter-segment revenues, and a description of each business are included in Note 18 Segment Reporting included in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements of this
Report. Certain amounts included in this Financial Review differ from those amounts shown in Note 18 primarily due to the presentation in this Financial Review of business net interest revenue on a taxable-equivalent basis.
Results of individual businesses are presented based on our management accounting practices and management structure. There is no comprehensive,
authoritative body of guidance for management accounting equivalent to GAAP; therefore, the financial results of our individual businesses are not necessarily comparable with similar information for any other company. We refine our methodologies
from time to time as our management accounting practices are enhanced and our businesses and management structure change. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to reflect current methodologies and our current business and management
structure. Financial results are presented, to the extent practicable, as if each business operated on a stand-alone basis. We have aggregated the business results for certain similar operating segments for financial reporting purposes.
Assets receive a funding charge and liabilities and capital receive a funding credit based on a transfer pricing
methodology that incorporates product maturities, duration and other factors.
A portion of capital is intended to cover unexpected losses and is assigned to our business segments using
our risk-based economic capital model, including consideration of the goodwill and other intangible assets at those business segments, as well as the diversification of risk among the business segments.
We have allocated the allowances for loan and lease losses and for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit based on our assessment of risk in the
business segment loan portfolios. Our allocation of the costs incurred by operations and other shared support areas not directly aligned with the businesses is primarily based on the use of services.
Total business segment financial results differ from total consolidated net income. The impact of these differences is reflected in the Other
category. Other for purposes of this Business Segments Review and the Business Segment Highlights in the Executive Summary includes residual activities that do not meet the criteria for disclosure as a separate reportable business, such
as gains or losses related to BlackRock transactions including long-term incentive plan (LTIP) share distributions and obligations, integration costs, asset and liability management activities including net securities gains or losses,
other-than-temporary impairment of investment securities and certain trading activities, exited businesses, alternative investments, including private equity, intercompany eliminations, most corporate overhead, tax adjustments that are not allocated
to business segments, and differences between business segment performance reporting and financial statement reporting (GAAP), including the presentation of net income attributable to noncontrolling interests.
Table 18: Results Of Businesses Summary
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Average Assets (a) |
|
Three months ended March 31 in millions |
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Retail Banking |
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
(18 |
) |
|
$ |
1,285 |
|
|
$ |
1,247 |
|
|
$ |
69,709 |
|
|
$ |
66,670 |
|
Corporate & Institutional Banking |
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
1,226 |
|
|
|
1,098 |
|
|
|
92,896 |
|
|
|
76,980 |
|
Asset Management Group |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
6,566 |
|
|
|
6,917 |
|
Residential Mortgage Banking |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
11,989 |
|
|
|
11,619 |
|
BlackRock |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
5,565 |
|
|
|
5,530 |
|
Non-Strategic Assets Portfolio |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
12,124 |
|
|
|
14,121 |
|
Total business segments |
|
|
770 |
|
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
3,348 |
|
|
|
3,178 |
|
|
|
198,849 |
|
|
|
181,837 |
|
Other (b) (c) |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
82,693 |
|
|
|
80,717 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
811 |
|
|
$ |
832 |
|
|
$ |
3,732 |
|
|
$ |
3,631 |
|
|
$ |
281,542 |
|
|
$ |
262,554 |
|
(a) |
Period-end balances for BlackRock. |
(b) |
For our segment reporting presentation in this Financial Review, Other for the first three months of 2012 included $145 million of pretax integration costs
related to acquisitions. |
(c) |
Other average assets include securities available for sale associated with asset and liability management activities. |
24 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
RETAIL BANKING
(Unaudited)
Table 19: Retail Banking Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31
Dollars in millions, except as noted |
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
INCOME STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
895 |
|
|
$ |
818 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposits |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
Brokerage |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
Consumer services |
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
Other |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
Total noninterest income |
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
Total revenue |
|
|
1,285 |
|
|
|
1,247 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
1,070 |
|
|
|
1,001 |
|
Pretax earnings (loss) |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
Income taxes (benefit) |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
Earnings (loss) |
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
(18 |
) |
AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
$ |
26,591 |
|
|
$ |
26,064 |
|
Indirect auto |
|
|
4,433 |
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
Indirect other |
|
|
1,282 |
|
|
|
1,612 |
|
Education |
|
|
9,440 |
|
|
|
9,101 |
|
Credit cards |
|
|
3,928 |
|
|
|
3,731 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,072 |
|
|
|
1,823 |
|
Total consumer |
|
|
47,746 |
|
|
|
44,731 |
|
Commercial and commercial real estate |
|
|
10,682 |
|
|
|
10,786 |
|
Floor plan |
|
|
1,663 |
|
|
|
1,572 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
1,031 |
|
|
|
1,287 |
|
Total loans |
|
|
61,122 |
|
|
|
58,376 |
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets |
|
|
5,888 |
|
|
|
5,769 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
2,699 |
|
|
|
2,525 |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
69,709 |
|
|
$ |
66,670 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing demand |
|
$ |
18,764 |
|
|
$ |
18,103 |
|
Interest-bearing demand |
|
|
25,707 |
|
|
|
20,921 |
|
Money market |
|
|
43,601 |
|
|
|
40,387 |
|
Total transaction deposits |
|
|
88,072 |
|
|
|
79,411 |
|
Savings |
|
|
9,077 |
|
|
|
7,573 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
28,150 |
|
|
|
35,365 |
|
Total deposits |
|
|
125,299 |
|
|
|
122,349 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
629 |
|
|
|
1,147 |
|
Capital |
|
|
8,328 |
|
|
|
8,048 |
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
134,256 |
|
|
$ |
131,544 |
|
PERFORMANCE RATIOS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average capital |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
Return on average assets |
|
|
.29 |
|
|
|
(.11 |
) |
Noninterest income to total revenue |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
Efficiency |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
OTHER INFORMATION (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit-related statistics: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial nonperforming assets |
|
$ |
315 |
|
|
$ |
301 |
|
Consumer nonperforming assets |
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
409 |
|
Total nonperforming assets (b) |
|
$ |
965 |
|
|
$ |
710 |
|
Purchased impaired loans (c) |
|
$ |
903 |
|
|
$ |
869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31 Dollars in millions, except as noted |
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
OTHER INFORMATION (CONTINUED) (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial lending net charge-offs |
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
67 |
|
Credit card lending net charge-offs |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
Consumer lending (excluding credit card) net charge-offs |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
Total net charge-offs |
|
$ |
191 |
|
|
$ |
257 |
|
Commercial lending annualized net charge-off ratio |
|
|
.91 |
% |
|
|
2.20 |
% |
Credit card lending annualized net charge-off ratio |
|
|
5.12 |
% |
|
|
7.39 |
% |
Consumer lending (excluding credit card) annualized net charge-off ratio |
|
|
1.01 |
% |
|
|
1.17 |
% |
Total annualized net charge-off ratio |
|
|
1.26 |
% |
|
|
1.79 |
% |
Home equity portfolio credit statistics: (d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of first lien positions at origination (e) |
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
36 |
% |
Weighted-average loan-to-value ratios (LTVs) (e) |
|
|
81 |
% |
|
|
73 |
% |
Weighted-average updated FICO scores (f) |
|
|
739 |
|
|
|
731 |
|
Annualized net charge-off ratio |
|
|
1.11 |
% |
|
|
1.31 |
% |
Loans 30 59 days past due |
|
|
.56 |
% |
|
|
.47 |
% |
Loans 60 89 days past due |
|
|
.35 |
% |
|
|
.31 |
% |
Loans 90 days past due (g) |
|
|
1.24 |
% |
|
|
.99 |
% |
Other statistics: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ATMs |
|
|
7,220 |
|
|
|
6,660 |
|
Branches (h) |
|
|
2,900 |
|
|
|
2,446 |
|
Customer-related statistics: (in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail Banking checking relationships |
|
|
6,278 |
|
|
|
5,521 |
|
Retail online banking active customers |
|
|
3,823 |
|
|
|
3,226 |
|
Retail online bill payment active customers |
|
|
1,161 |
|
|
|
1,029 |
|
Brokerage statistics: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial consultants (i) |
|
|
693 |
|
|
|
700 |
|
Full service brokerage offices |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
Brokerage account assets (billions) |
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
$ |
35 |
|
(a) |
Presented as of March 31, except for net charge-offs and annualized net charge-off ratios, which are for the three months ended. |
(b) |
Includes nonperforming loans of $923 million at March 31, 2012 and $688 million at March 31, 2011. In the first quarter of 2012, we adopted a policy stating that Home
equity loans past due 90 days or more would be placed on nonaccrual status. The prior policy required that these loans be past due 180 days before being placed on nonaccrual status. |
(c) |
Recorded investment of purchased impaired loans related to acquisitions. |
(d) |
Lien position, LTV, FICO and delinquency statistics are based upon balances and other data that exclude the impact of accounting for acquired loans.
|
(e) |
Updated LTV is reported for March 31, 2012. For previous quarters, lien positions and LTV are based upon data from loan origination. Original LTV excludes certain
acquired portfolio loans where this data is not available. |
(f) |
Represents FICO scores that are updated monthly for home equity lines and quarterly for the home equity installment loans. |
(g) |
Includes non-accrual loans. |
(h) |
Excludes satellite offices (e.g., drive-ups, electronic branches, and retirement centers) that provide limited products and/or services. |
(i) |
Financial consultants provide services in full service brokerage offices and traditional bank branches. |
Retail Banking earned $50 million for the quarter compared with a loss of $18 million for a year ago quarter. Earnings increased from the prior year
quarter as improving credit quality, a more favorable interest rate environment, higher loan and transaction deposit balances, and higher volumes of customer-initiated transactions were partially offset by the regulatory impact of lower interchange
fees on debit card transactions and increased noninterest expense as a result of
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 25
additions to legal reserves and the operating expenses associated with RBC Bank (USA). The first quarter of 2012 results include the impact of the retail business associated with the March 2012
acquisition of RBC Bank (USA) and the credit card portfolio purchase from RBC Bank (Georgia), National Association. Retail Banking added approximately $12.1 billion in deposits, $4.9 billion in loans, 460,000 checking relationships, over 400
branches, and over 400 ATMs through this acquisition.
Retail Bankings core strategy is to grow consumer and small business checking
households, and to provide an experience that builds customer loyalty and creates opportunities to sell other products and services including loans, savings, investment products and money management services. Net new checking relationships grew
517,000 in the first quarter, including 460,000 from the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition. The growth reflects strong results and gains in all of our markets as well as strong customer retention in the overall network. The business is also focused on
expanding the use of technology, using services such as online banking and mobile deposit taking to improve customer service convenience and lower our service delivery costs. Active online banking customers and active online bill payment customers
grew by 19% and 13%, respectively, from the prior year first quarter. Retail Bankings footprint extends across 17 states and Washington, D.C. covering nearly half the US population and serving 5,546,000 consumers and 732,000 small businesses
with 2,900 branches and 7,220 ATMs.
Total revenue for the first quarter of 2012 was $1.3 billion compared with $1.2 billion for the
same period of 2011. Net interest income of $895 million increased $77 million compared with the first quarter of 2011. The increase resulted from higher loan and transaction deposit balances and lower rates paid on deposits.
Noninterest income declined $39 million compared to the first quarter 2011. The decline was driven by lower interchange rates on debit card transactions
due to Dodd-Frank and lower brokerage fees, partially offset by higher volumes of customer-initiated transactions including debit and credit cards and higher service charges on deposits. The Dodd-Frank limits related to interchange rates on debit
card transactions were effective October 1, 2011. In the first quarter of 2012, the negative impact on Retail Banking revenue from these limits was approximately $70 million. Based on 2012 projected transaction volumes, we expect an additional
incremental reduction in 2012 revenue of approximately $230 million.
The provision for credit losses was $135 million in the first quarter of
2012 compared with $276 million in prior year first quarter. Net charge-offs were $191 million for the first quarter 2012 compared with $257 million in the prior year first
quarter. Improvements in credit quality over the prior year were evident in the small business, home equity and credit card portfolios. The level of provisioning will be dependent on general
economic conditions, loan growth, utilization of credit commitments and asset quality.
Noninterest expense increased $69 million in the first
quarter of 2012 from same period of 2011. The increase was primarily attributable to additions to legal reserves and the operating expenses associated with RBC Bank (USA).
Growing core checking deposits is key to Retail Bankings growth. The deposit product strategy of Retail Banking is to remain disciplined on pricing, target specific products and markets for growth,
and focus on the retention and growth of balances for relationship customers. In the first quarter of 2012, average total deposits of $125.3 billion increased $3.0 billion, or 2%, compared with the same period in 2011.
|
|
|
The RBC Bank (USA) acquisition, customer preference for liquidity in the low rate environment, and customer growth resulted in period over period
growth in average transaction deposits of $8.7 billion, or 11% and growth in average savings deposit balances of $1.5 billion or 20%. In the first quarter of 2012, compared with the year-ago quarter, average demand deposits increased $5.5 billion,
or 14% to $44.5 billion; average money market deposits increased $3.2 billion, or 8% to $43.6 billion. |
|
|
|
Average consumer certificates of deposit decreased $7.2 billion or 20% from the same period in 2011 and was partially offset by the impact of the RBC
Bank (USA) acquisition. The decline in high-rate certificates of deposit is expected to continue through the second quarter of 2012. |
Retail Banking continues to focus on a relationship-based lending strategy that targets specific customer sectors including mass and mass affluent consumers, small businesses and auto dealerships. In the
first quarter of 2012, average total loans were $61.1 billion, an increase of $2.7 billion, or 5%, over the same quarter in 2011, of which $1.5 billion was attributable to the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition, primarily in the home equity portfolio.
|
|
|
Average indirect auto loans increased $2.0 billion, or 85%, over the same quarter in 2011. The increase was due to the expansion of our indirect sales
force and product introduction to acquired markets, as well as overall increases in auto sales. |
|
|
|
Average home equity loans increased $527 million, or 2%, compared with the same period in 2011. The increase was primarily due to the RBC Bank (USA)
acquisition. The remainder of the portfolio showed a decline as loan demand was outpaced by paydowns, refinancings, and charge-offs. Retail Bankings home
|
26 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
|
|
equity loan portfolio is relationship based, with 97% of the portfolio attributable to borrowers in our primary geographic footprint. A change in policy implemented in the first quarter of 2012
on home equity loans places them on nonaccrual status when past due 90 days or more compared with 180 days under the prior policy. |
|
|
|
Average education loans grew $339 million, or 4%, compared with the same period in 2011, primarily due to portfolio purchases in July 2011 and November
2011 of approximately $445 million and $560 million, respectively. |
|
|
|
Average auto dealer floor plan loans grew $91 million, or 6%, compared with the same quarter in 2011, primarily resulting from additional dealer
relationships. |
|
|
|
Average credit card balances increased $197 million, or 5%, over the same quarter in 2011. An increase in active accounts and the portfolio purchase
from RBC Bank (Georgia) National Association combined to increase credit card balances. |
|
|
|
Average commercial and commercial real estate loans declined $104 million, or 1%, compared with the same period in 2011. The decrease was primarily due
to refinancings, paydowns, and charge-offs, partially offset by the acquisition of RBC Bank (USA). |
|
|
|
Average indirect other and residential mortgages are primarily run-off portfolios and declined $330 million and $256 million, respectively, compared
with the same period in 2011. The indirect other portfolio is comprised of marine, RV, and other indirect loan products.
|
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 27
CORPORATE & INSTITUTIONAL BANKING
(Unaudited)
Table 20: Corporate & Institutional Banking Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31
Dollars in millions, except as noted |
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
INCOME STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
896 |
|
|
$ |
799 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate service fees |
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
Other |
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
Total revenue |
|
|
1,226 |
|
|
|
1,098 |
|
Provision for credit losses (benefit) |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
Noninterest expense |
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
445 |
|
Pretax earnings |
|
|
744 |
|
|
|
683 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
Earnings |
|
$ |
470 |
|
|
$ |
432 |
|
AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
42,919 |
|
|
$ |
33,194 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
14,388 |
|
|
|
14,347 |
|
Commercial real estate related |
|
|
4,971 |
|
|
|
3,463 |
|
Asset-based lending |
|
|
9,266 |
|
|
|
7,370 |
|
Equipment lease financing |
|
|
5,706 |
|
|
|
5,540 |
|
Total loans |
|
|
77,250 |
|
|
|
63,914 |
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets |
|
|
3,442 |
|
|
|
3,484 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
1,244 |
|
|
|
1,341 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
10,960 |
|
|
|
8,241 |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
92,896 |
|
|
$ |
76,980 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing demand |
|
$ |
37,225 |
|
|
$ |
27,843 |
|
Money market |
|
|
13,872 |
|
|
|
12,131 |
|
Other |
|
|
5,372 |
|
|
|
6,057 |
|
Total deposits |
|
|
56,469 |
|
|
|
46,031 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
15,987 |
|
|
|
12,205 |
|
Capital |
|
|
8,537 |
|
|
|
7,858 |
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
80,993 |
|
|
$ |
66,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31
Dollars in millions, except as noted |
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
PERFORMANCE RATIOS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average capital |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
Return on average assets |
|
|
2.03 |
|
|
|
2.28 |
|
Noninterest income to total revenue |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
Efficiency |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SERVICING PORTFOLIO
(in billions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period |
|
$ |
267 |
|
|
$ |
266 |
|
Acquisitions/additions |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Repayments/transfers |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
End of period |
|
$ |
268 |
|
|
$ |
266 |
|
OTHER INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated revenue from: (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Management |
|
$ |
311 |
|
|
$ |
301 |
|
Capital Markets |
|
$ |
156 |
|
|
$ |
139 |
|
Commercial mortgage loans held for sale (b) |
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
Commercial mortgage loan servicing income, net of amortization (c) |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
Commercial mortgage servicing rights impairment |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
Total commercial mortgage banking activities |
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
Total loans (d) |
|
$ |
84,329 |
|
|
$ |
64,368 |
|
Credit-related statistics: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming assets (d) (e) |
|
$ |
1,776 |
|
|
$ |
2,574 |
|
Purchased impaired loans (d) (f) |
|
$ |
1,177 |
|
|
$ |
659 |
|
Net charge-offs |
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
153 |
|
Net carrying amount of commercial mortgage servicing rights (d) |
|
$ |
428 |
|
|
$ |
645 |
|
(a) |
Represents consolidated PNC amounts. See the additional revenue discussion regarding treasury management, capital markets-related products and services, and commercial
mortgage banking activities in the Product Revenue section of the Consolidated Income Statement Review. |
(b) |
Includes valuations on commercial mortgage loans held for sale and related commitments, derivative valuations, origination fees, gains on sale of loans held for sale
and net interest income on loans held for sale. |
(c) |
Includes net interest income and noninterest income from loan servicing and ancillary services, net of commercial mortgage servicing rights amortization. Commercial
mortgage servicing rights impairment is shown separately. |
(e) |
Includes nonperforming loans of $1.6 billion at March 31, 2012 and $2.4 billion at March 31, 2011. |
(f) |
Recorded investment of purchased impaired loans related to acquisitions.
|
28 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
Corporate & Institutional Banking earned $470 million in the first quarter of 2012 and $432
million in the first quarter of 2011. The increase in earnings was primarily due to higher net interest and noninterest income which more than offset an increase in the provision for credit losses. We continued to focus on adding new clients,
increasing cross sales, and remaining committed to strong expense discipline.
The first quarter of 2012 included the impact of the RBC Bank
(USA) acquisition which added approximately $7.5 billion of loans and $4.8 billion of deposits.
Highlights of Corporate &
Institutional Bankings performance during first quarter 2012 include the following:
|
|
|
Overall results benefited from successful sales efforts to new clients and product penetration of the existing customer base.
|
|
|
|
New primary client acquisitions in corporate banking were 243 in the first quarter of 2012, consistent with growth in 2011.
|
|
|
|
Loan commitments increased 23% to $163 billion at March 31, 2012 compared to March 31, 2011, primarily due to the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition
and growth in our Corporate Finance, Public Finance, Healthcare, Real Estate and Business Credit businesses. |
|
|
|
Loan balances have increased for five consecutive quarters, including an increase in average loans for the first quarter of 2012 of $13.3 billion or
21%, compared to the first quarter of 2011. |
|
|
|
Our Treasury Management business, which ranks among the top providers in the country, continued to invest in markets, products and infrastructure as
well as major initiatives such as healthcare. |
|
|
|
Cross sales of treasury management and capital markets products to customers in PNCs markets continued to be successful and were ahead of both
target and 2011. |
|
|
|
Midland Loan Services, one of the leading third-party providers of servicing for the commercial real estate industry, received the highest U.S.
servicer and special servicer ratings from Fitch Ratings and Standard & Poors for the 11th consecutive year. |
|
|
|
Midland Loan Services was the number one servicer of FNMA and FHLMC multifamily and healthcare loans and was the second leading servicer of commercial
and multifamily loans by volume as of March 31, 2012 according to Mortgage Bankers Association. |
Net interest income in
the first quarter of 2012 was $896 million, a 12% increase from the first quarter of 2011,
reflecting higher average loans and deposits
including the impact of the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition.
Corporate service fees were $202 million in the first quarter of 2012, a increase of
$15 million from the first quarter of 2011, primarily due to higher commercial mortgage banking revenue
and merger and acquisition advisory fees. The increases more than offset a decrease in treasury management fees due to the impact of the prolonged low interest rate environment which has resulted
in customers leaving compensating balances in lieu of paying fees. The major components of corporate service fees are treasury management, corporate finance fees and commercial mortgage servicing revenue.
Other noninterest income was $128 million in the first three months of 2012 compared with $112 million in the first three months of 2011. The increase of
$16 million was primarily due to customer driven capital markets activity.
The provision for credit losses was $19 million in the first
quarter of 2012 compared with a benefit of $30 million in the first quarter of 2011. The increase reflected the impact of higher loan and commitment levels. There were net charge-offs of $43 million in the first quarter of 2012, which decreased $110
million, or 72%, compared with the first quarter of 2011. The decline was attributable primarily to the commercial real estate and aviation portfolios. Nonperforming assets declined for the eighth consecutive quarter, and at $1.8 billion represented
a 31% decrease from March 31, 2011.
Noninterest expense was $463 million in the first quarter of 2012, an increase of $18 million from
the first quarter of 2011. Higher compensation-related costs were driven by higher staffing including the impact of the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition.
Average loans were $77.3 billion in the first quarter of 2012 compared with $63.9 billion in the first quarter of 2011, an increase of 21%.
|
|
|
The Corporate Banking business provides lending, treasury management, and capital markets-related products and services to mid-sized corporations,
government and not-for-profit entities, and selectively to large corporations. Average loans for this business increased $7.9 billion or 25% in the first quarter of 2012 compared with the first quarter of 2011. Loan commitments have increased since
the second quarter of 2011 due to new customers and increased demand from existing customers. |
|
|
|
PNC Real Estate provides commercial real estate and real-estate related lending and is one of the industrys top providers of both conventional
and affordable multifamily financing. Average loans for this business increased $1.6 billion or 10% in the first quarter of 2012 compared to the first quarter of 2011 due to improved originations. |
|
|
|
PNC Business Credit is one of the top middle market asset-based lenders in the country. The loan portfolio is relatively high yielding, with moderate
risk, as the loans are mainly secured by short-term assets. Average loans increased $1.9 billion or 26% in the first quarter of 2012 compared with the first quarter of 2011 due to customers seeking stable lending
|
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 29
|
|
sources, loan usage rates, and market expansion. |
|
|
|
PNC Equipment Finance is the 4th largest bank-affiliated leasing company with over $9 billion in equipment finance assets.
|
Average deposits were $56.5 billion in the first quarter of 2012, an increase of $10.4 billion, or 23%, compared with the
first quarter of 2011.
|
|
|
Deposit growth has been very strong, and is an industry-wide trend as clients are holding record levels of cash and liquidity.
|
|
|
|
Deposit inflows into noninterest-bearing demand deposits continued as FDIC insurance has been an attraction for customers maintaining liquidity during
this prolonged period of low interest rates. |
|
|
|
The repeal of Regulation Q limitations on interest-bearing commercial demand deposit accounts became effective in the third quarter of 2011. As
expected, interest in this product has been muted due to the current rate environment and the limited amount of FDIC insurance coverage. |
The commercial mortgage servicing portfolio was $268 billion at March 31, 2012 compared with $266 billion March 31, 2011. Servicing additions were mostly offset by portfolio run-off.
See the additional revenue discussion regarding treasury management, capital markets-related products and services, and commercial mortgage banking
activities in the Product Revenue section of the Consolidated Income Statement Review.
ASSET MANAGEMENT GROUP
(Unaudited)
Table 21: Asset Management Group Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31
Dollars in millions, except as noted |
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
INCOME STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
63 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
Total revenue |
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
Provision for credit losses (benefit) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Noninterest expense |
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
Pretax earnings |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Earnings |
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
$ |
4,183 |
|
|
$ |
4,054 |
|
Commercial and commercial real estate |
|
|
1,126 |
|
|
|
1,503 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
692 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
Total loans |
|
|
6,001 |
|
|
|
6,272 |
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets |
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
374 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
6,566 |
|
|
$ |
6,917 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing demand |
|
$ |
1,575 |
|
|
$ |
1,161 |
|
Interest-bearing demand |
|
|
2,637 |
|
|
|
2,291 |
|
Money market |
|
|
3,651 |
|
|
|
3,591 |
|
Total transaction deposits |
|
|
7,863 |
|
|
|
7,043 |
|
CDs/IRAs/savings deposits |
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
676 |
|
Total deposits |
|
|
8,412 |
|
|
|
7,719 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
Capital |
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
8,830 |
|
|
$ |
8,132 |
|
PERFORMANCE RATIOS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average capital |
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
51 |
% |
Return on average assets |
|
|
1.72 |
|
|
|
2.52 |
|
Noninterest income to total revenue |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
Efficiency |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
OTHER INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets (a) (b) |
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
$ |
74 |
|
Purchased impaired loans (a) (c) |
|
$ |
126 |
|
|
$ |
143 |
|
Total net charge-offs (recoveries) |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
30 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31
Dollars in millions, except as noted |
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Assets Under Administration (in billions) (a) (d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal |
|
$ |
104 |
|
|
$ |
102 |
|
Institutional |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
219 |
|
|
$ |
219 |
|
Asset Type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
$ |
120 |
|
Fixed Income |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
Liquidity/Other |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
219 |
|
|
$ |
219 |
|
Discretionary assets under management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal |
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
$ |
71 |
|
Institutional |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
112 |
|
|
$ |
110 |
|
Asset Type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
$ |
58 |
|
|
$ |
57 |
|
Fixed Income |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
Liquidity/Other |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
112 |
|
|
$ |
110 |
|
Nondiscretionary assets under administration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal |
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
Institutional |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
107 |
|
|
$ |
109 |
|
Asset Type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
$ |
63 |
|
Fixed Income |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Liquidity/Other |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
107 |
|
|
$ |
109 |
|
(b) |
Includes nonperforming loans of $69 million at March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011. |
(c) |
Recorded investment of purchased impaired loans related to acquisitions. |
(d) |
Excludes brokerage account assets. |
Asset
Management Group earned $28 million in the first quarter of 2012 compared with $43 million in the first quarter of 2011. Assets under administration were $219 billion as of March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011. The decline in earnings
compared to the first quarter of 2011 resulted from higher noninterest expense from strategic business investments and higher provision for credit losses. First quarter 2012 net charge-offs were $2 million compared with net recoveries of $11 million
in the first quarter of 2011. Revenue increased $9 million or 4% in the year-over-year comparison as growth in discretionary assets under management drove higher noninterest income and higher average deposit balances increased net interest income.
The core growth strategies for the business include: increasing channel penetration; investing in higher growth geographies; and investing in
differentiated client-facing technology. During the first quarter of 2012, the business delivered strong sales production and benefited from significant referrals from other PNC lines of business. Over time and with stabilized market conditions, the
successful execution of these strategies and the accumulation of our strong sales performance are
expected to create meaningful growth in assets under management and noninterest income.
Highlights of Asset Management Groups performance during the first three months of 2012 include the following:
|
|
|
Positive net flows of approximately $0.2 billion in discretionary assets under management after adjustments to total net flows for cyclical client
activities; |
|
|
|
Strong sales production, up nearly 35% over the prior year first quarter; |
|
|
|
Significant referrals from other PNC lines of business, an increase of nearly 40% over first quarter 2011; and |
|
|
|
Continuing levels of new business investment and focused hiring to drive growth with nearly 65 external new hires. |
Assets under administration were $219 billion at March 31, 2012, comparable to the same amount at March 31, 2011. Discretionary assets under
management were $112 billion at March 31, 2012 compared with $110 billion at March 31, 2011. The increase in the year-over-year comparison was driven by higher equity markets, strong sales performance and successful client retention.
Total revenue for the first quarter was $231 million compared with $222 million for the same period in 2011. Net interest income was $63
million for the first quarter of 2012 compared with $60 million in the first quarter 2011. The increase was attributable to higher deposit balances. Noninterest income was $168 million for the first three months of 2012, up $6 million from the prior
year due to stronger average equity markets and strong sales.
Provision for credit losses was $10 million for the first quarter of 2012
compared to a benefit of $6 million in the first quarter of 2011.
Noninterest expense was $176 million in the first quarter of 2012, an
increase of $16 million or 10% from the prior year. The increase was attributable to investments in the business to drive growth including front-line sales staff, client-facing technology and aggressive marketing. Over the last 12 months, total
full-time headcount has increased by approximately 116 positions or 4%. Asset Management Group remains focused on disciplined expense management as it invests in these strategic growth opportunities.
Average deposits for the quarter increased $693 million, or 9%, over the prior year. Average transaction deposits grew 12% compared with 2011 and were
partially offset by the strategic run-off of higher rate certificates of deposit in the comparison. Average loan balances of $6.0 billion decreased $271 million, or 4%, from the prior year as portfolio repositioning and loan pay downs exceeded new
loan production.
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 31
RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE BANKING
(Unaudited)
Table 22: Residential Mortgage Banking Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31
Dollars in millions, except as noted |
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
INCOME STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
56 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan servicing revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing fees |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Net MSR hedging gains |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
Loan sales revenue |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
Other |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Total noninterest income |
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
Total revenue |
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
Provision for credit losses (benefit) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
Pretax earnings |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
Earnings |
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
$ |
71 |
|
AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio loans |
|
$ |
2,922 |
|
|
$ |
2,734 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
1,675 |
|
|
|
1,802 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights (MSR) |
|
|
645 |
|
|
|
1,048 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
6,747 |
|
|
|
6,035 |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
11,989 |
|
|
$ |
11,619 |
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
1,662 |
|
|
$ |
1,587 |
|
Borrowings and other liabilities |
|
|
4,353 |
|
|
|
4,144 |
|
Capital |
|
|
832 |
|
|
|
729 |
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
6,847 |
|
|
$ |
6,460 |
|
PERFORMANCE RATIOS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average capital |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
39 |
% |
Return on average assets |
|
|
2.05 |
|
|
|
2.48 |
|
Noninterest income to total revenue |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
Efficiency |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE SERVICING PORTFOLIO
THIRD-PARTY (in billions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period |
|
$ |
118 |
|
|
$ |
125 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Additions |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Repayments/transfers |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
End of period |
|
$ |
121 |
|
|
$ |
127 |
|
Servicing portfolio third-party statistics: (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate |
|
|
91 |
% |
|
|
90 |
% |
Adjustable rate/balloon |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
Weighted-average interest rate |
|
|
5.26 |
% |
|
|
5.53 |
% |
MSR capitalized value (in billions) |
|
$ |
.7 |
|
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
MSR capitalization value (in basis points) |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
Weighted-average servicing fee (in basis points) |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
OTHER INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan origination volume (in billions) |
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
|
$ |
3.2 |
|
Percentage of originations represented by: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency and government programs |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
Refinance volume |
|
|
82 |
% |
|
|
85 |
% |
Total nonperforming assets (a) (b) |
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
78 |
|
Purchased impaired loans (a) (c) |
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
158 |
|
(b) |
Includes nonperforming loans of $39 million at March 31, 2012 and $101 million at March 31, 2011. |
(c) |
Recorded investment of purchased impaired loans related to acquisitions. |
Residential Mortgage Banking earned $61 million in the first quarter of 2012 compared with $71 million in the first quarter of 2011. Earnings declined from the prior year first quarter primarily as a
result of higher noninterest expense, partially offset by increased loans sales revenue, lower provision for credit losses and higher net hedging gains on mortgage servicing rights and servicing fees.
Residential Mortgage Banking overview:
|
|
|
Total loan originations were $3.4 billion for 2012 compared with $3.2 billion in 2011. Loans continue to be originated primarily through direct
channels under FNMA, FHLMC and FHA/VA agency guidelines. |
|
|
|
Investors having purchased mortgage loans may request PNC to indemnify them against losses on certain loans or to repurchase loans that they believe do
not comply with applicable contractual loan origination covenants and representations and warranties we have made. At March 31, 2012, the liability for estimated losses on repurchase and indemnification claims for the Residential Mortgage
Banking business segment was $101 million compared with $83 million at December 31, 2011 and $124 million at March 31, 2011. See the Recourse And Repurchase Obligations section of this Financial Review and Note 17 Commitments and
Guarantees in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements of this Report for additional information. |
|
|
|
Residential mortgage loans serviced for others totaled $121 billion at March 31, 2012 compared with $127 billion at March 31, 2011 as payoffs
continued to outpace new direct loan origination volume. |
|
|
|
Noninterest income was $241 million in the first quarter of 2012 compared with $202 million in the first quarter of 2011. The increase resulted from
higher loan sales revenue driven by higher loan origination volume, higher net hedging gains on mortgage servicing rights and higher servicing fees. |
|
|
|
Net interest income was $51 million in the first quarter of 2012 compared with $56 million in the first quarter of 2011. The decrease in the
comparisons was primarily due to lower interest yields on loans held for sale. |
|
|
|
Noninterest expense was $203 million in the first quarter of 2012 compared with $137 million in the first quarter of 2011. The increase from the prior
year first quarter was primarily driven by higher residential mortgage foreclosure-related expenses and additions to legal reserves.
|
32 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
|
|
|
The fair value of mortgage servicing rights was $0.7 billion at March 31, 2012 compared with $1.1 billion at March 31, 2011. The decline was
due to lower mortgage rates at March 31, 2012 and a smaller mortgage servicing portfolio. |
BLACKROCK
(Unaudited)
Table 23: BlackRock Table
Information related to our equity investment in BlackRock follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 Dollars in millions |
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Business segment earnings (a) |
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
$ |
86 |
|
PNCs economic interest in BlackRock (b) |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
(a) |
Includes PNCs share of BlackRocks reported GAAP earnings and additional income taxes on those earnings incurred by PNC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In billions |
|
Mar. 31 2012 |
|
|
Dec. 31 2011 |
|
Carrying value of PNCs investment in BlackRock (c) |
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
Market value of PNCs investment in BlackRock (d) |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
(c) |
PNC accounts for its investment in BlackRock under the equity method of accounting, exclusive of a related deferred tax liability of $1.8 billion at March 31, 2012
and $1.7 billion at December 31, 2011. |
(d) |
Does not include liquidity discount. |
PNC
accounts for its BlackRock Series C Preferred Stock at fair value, which offsets the impact of marking-to-market the obligation to deliver these shares to BlackRock to partially fund BlackRock LTIP programs. The fair value amount of the BlackRock
Series C Preferred Stock is included on our Consolidated Balance Sheet in the caption Other assets. Additional information regarding the valuation of the BlackRock Series C Preferred Stock is included in Note 8 Fair Value in the Notes To
Consolidated Financial Statements of this Report.
At March 31, 2012, approximately 1.5 million shares of BlackRock Series C
Preferred Stock were available to fund a portion of awards under future BlackRock LTIP programs.
PNC accounts for its remaining investment in
BlackRock under the equity method of accounting. Our voting interest in BlackRock common stock (approximately 24% at March 31, 2012) is higher than our overall share of BlackRocks equity and earnings.
Our 2011 Form 10-K includes additional information about our investment in BlackRock, including the September 2011 transfer of 1.3 million shares of
BlackRock Series C Preferred Stock from PNC to BlackRock to satisfy a portion of our LTIP obligation.
NON-STRATEGIC ASSETS PORTFOLIO
(Unaudited)
Table 24: Non-Strategic Assets Portfolio Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 Dollars in millions |
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
INCOME STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
217 |
|
|
$ |
236 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
Total revenue |
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
Pretax earnings |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Earnings |
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Lending: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial/Commercial real estate |
|
$ |
1,004 |
|
|
$ |
1,582 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
757 |
|
Total commercial lending |
|
|
1,674 |
|
|
|
2,339 |
|
Consumer Lending: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
4,849 |
|
|
|
5,559 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
6,046 |
|
|
|
6,332 |
|
Total consumer lending |
|
|
10,895 |
|
|
|
11,891 |
|
Total portfolio loans |
|
|
12,569 |
|
|
|
14,230 |
|
Other assets (a) |
|
|
(445 |
) |
|
|
(109 |
) |
Total assets |
|
$ |
12,124 |
|
|
$ |
14,121 |
|
Deposits and other liabilities |
|
$ |
177 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
Capital |
|
|
1,176 |
|
|
|
1,371 |
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
1,353 |
|
|
$ |
1,530 |
|
PERFORMANCE RATIOS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average capital |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
Return on average assets |
|
|
2.36 |
|
|
|
.72 |
|
OTHER INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming assets (b) (c) |
|
$ |
1,192 |
|
|
$ |
1,208 |
|
Purchased impaired loans (b) (d) |
|
$ |
6,097 |
|
|
$ |
5,685 |
|
Net charge-offs (e) |
|
$ |
91 |
|
|
$ |
123 |
|
Annualized net charge-off ratio (e) |
|
|
2.91 |
% |
|
|
3.51 |
% |
LOANS (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Lending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial/Commercial real estate |
|
$ |
1,104 |
|
|
$ |
1,474 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
695 |
|
Total commercial lending |
|
|
1,775 |
|
|
|
2,169 |
|
Consumer Lending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
4,751 |
|
|
|
5,381 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
6,693 |
|
|
|
6,325 |
|
Total consumer lending |
|
|
11,444 |
|
|
|
11,706 |
|
Total loans |
|
$ |
13,219 |
|
|
$ |
13,875 |
|
(a) |
Other assets includes deferred taxes, ALLL and OREO. Other assets were negative in both periods due to the ALLL. |
(c) |
Includes nonperforming loans of $.7 billion at March 31, 2012 and $.9 billion at March 31, 2011. |
(d) |
Recorded investment of purchased impaired loans related to acquisitions. At March 31, 2012, this segment contained 72% of PNCs purchased impaired loans.
|
(e) |
For the three months ended March 31. |
This
business segment consists primarily of acquired non-strategic assets that fall outside of our core business strategy. Non-Strategic Assets Portfolio had earnings of $71 million in the first quarter of 2012 compared with $25 million
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 33
in the first quarter of 2011. The increase was primarily attributable to a lower provision for credit losses partially offset by a decline in revenue.
Non-Strategic Assets Portfolio overview:
|
|
|
Average loans declined to $12.6 billion in the first quarter of 2012 compared with $14.2 billion in the first quarter of 2011. The overall decline was
driven by customer payment activity and portfolio management activities to reduce under-performing assets partially offset by the addition of loans from the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition. |
|
|
|
The first quarter of 2012 included the impact of the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition which added approximately $1.0 billion of residential real estate
loans, $.2 billion of commercial/commercial real estate loans and $.2 billion of OREO assets. Of these assets, $1.0 billion were deemed purchased impaired loans. |
|
|
|
Net interest income was $217 million in the first three months of 2012 compared with $236 million in the first three months of 2011. The decrease
reflected lower loan balances and related purchase accounting accretion. |
|
|
|
Noninterest income was a loss of $19 million in the first quarter of 2012 compared with earnings of $9 million in the first quarter of 2011. The
decline was driven mainly by additions to the liability for estimated losses on repurchase and indemnification claims. |
|
|
|
The provision for credit losses was $18 million in the first three months of 2012 compared with $152 million in the first three months of 2011. The
decline was primarily due to overall improvement in credit quality across the portfolios. |
|
|
|
Noninterest expense in the first quarter of 2012 was $68 million compared with $53 million in the first quarter of 2011. The increase was due to higher
other real estate owned costs. |
|
|
|
Nonperforming loans decreased to $.7 billion at March 31, 2012 compared with $.9 billion at March 31, 2011. The consumer lending portfolio
comprised 68% of the nonperforming loans at March 31, 2012. Nonperforming consumer loans increased $19 million. |
|
|
|
Net charge-offs were $91 million in the first quarter of 2012 and $123 million in the first quarter of 2011. The decrease was due to lower net
charge-offs on residential real estate and commercial real estate loans. |
The majority of assets within this portfolio were
obtained through acquisitions and fall outside of our core business strategy. Consequently, the business activity of this segment is to manage the wind-down of the portfolio assigned to it while maximizing the value and mitigating risk. The fair
value marks taken upon acquisition of the assets, the team we have in place, and targeted asset resolution strategies help us to
manage these assets. Additionally, our capital and liquidity positions provide us flexibility in a challenging environment to optimize returns on this portfolio for our shareholders.
|
|
|
The $13.2 billion of loans held in this portfolio at March 31, 2012 are stated inclusive of a fair value adjustment on purchased impaired loans at
acquisition. Taking the adjustment and the ALLL into account, the net carrying basis of this loan portfolio is 79% of customer outstandings. |
|
|
|
The Commercial Lending portfolio within this segment is comprised of $1.1 billion in residential development loans (i.e. condominiums, townhomes,
developed and undeveloped land) and $.7 billion of performing cross-border leases. This portfolio has been reduced by 18% since March 31, 2011 driven by the decline in residential development loans. The cross-border lease portfolio has been
relatively stable. These assets are long-term and are of high credit quality. |
|
|
|
The performance of the Consumer Lending portfolio within this segment is dependent upon economic growth, unemployment rates, the housing market
recovery and the interest rate environment. The portfolios credit quality performance has stabilized through actions taken by management over the last three years. Approximately 75% of customers have been current with principal and interest
payments for the past 12 months. Consumer Lending consists of consumer loans, which are mainly brokered home equity loans and lines of credit, and residential real estate mortgages. The residential real estate mortgage portfolio is composed of jumbo
and ALT-A first lien mortgages, non-prime first and second lien mortgages and, to a lesser extent, residential construction loans. Management has implemented various refinance programs, line management programs, and loss mitigation programs to
mitigate risks within these portfolios while assisting borrowers to maintain homeownership when possible. |
|
|
|
When loans are sold, we may assume certain loan repurchase obligations associated with those loans primarily relating to situations where investors may
request PNC to indemnify them against losses or to repurchase loans that they believe do not comply with applicable contractual loan origination covenants and representations and warranties we have made. From 2005 to 2007, home equity loans were
sold with such contractual provisions. At March 31, 2012, the liability for estimated losses on repurchase and indemnification claims for the Non-Strategic Assets Portfolio business segment was $51 million compared to $128 million at
March 31, 2011. See the Recourse And Repurchase Obligations section of this Financial Review and Note 17 Commitments and Guarantees in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements included this Report for additional information.
|
34 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
AND JUDGMENTS
Note 1 Accounting Policies in Part II, Item 8 of our 2011 Form 10-K and in the Notes To
Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Report describe the most significant accounting policies that we use. Certain of these policies require us to make estimates or economic assumptions that may prove inaccurate
or be subject to variations that may significantly affect our reported results and financial position for the period or in future periods.
We
must use estimates, assumptions, and judgments when assets and liabilities are required to be recorded at, or adjusted to reflect, fair value.
Assets and liabilities carried at fair value inherently result in a higher degree of financial statement volatility. Fair values and the information used
to record valuation adjustments for certain assets and liabilities are based on either quoted market prices or are provided by independent third-party sources, including appraisers and valuation specialists, when available. When such third-party
information is not available, we estimate fair value primarily by using cash flow and other financial modeling techniques. Changes in underlying factors, assumptions, or estimates could materially impact our future financial condition and results of
operations.
We discuss the following critical accounting policies and judgments under this same heading in Item 7 of our 2011 Form 10-K:
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements |
|
|
|
Allowances For Loan And Lease Losses And Unfunded Loan Commitments And Letters of Credit |
|
|
|
Estimated Cash Flows on Purchased Impaired Loans |
|
|
|
Residential and Commercial Mortgage Servicing Rights |
|
|
|
Proposed Accounting Standards |
We provide additional information about many of these items in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part l, Item l of this Report, including in the case of Residential and Commercial
Mortgage Servicing Rights in Notes 8 and 9.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1 Accounting Policies in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of this Report regarding the impact of the adoption of new accounting
guidance issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board.
STATUS OF QUALIFIED
DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN
We have a noncontributory, qualified defined
benefit pension plan (plan or pension plan) covering eligible employees. Benefits are determined using a cash balance formula where earnings credits are a percentage of eligible compensation. Pension contributions are based on an actuarially
determined amount necessary to fund total benefits payable to plan participants. Consistent with our investment strategy, plan assets are primarily invested in equity investments and fixed income instruments. Plan fiduciaries determine and review
the plans investment policy, which is described more fully in Note 14 Employee Benefit Plans in our 2011 Form 10-K.
We calculate the
expense associated with the pension plan and the assumptions and methods that we use reflect trust assets at their fair market value. On an annual basis, we review the actuarial assumptions related to the pension plan. The primary assumptions used
to measure pension obligations and costs are the discount rate, compensation increase and expected long-term return on assets. Among these, the compensation increase assumption does not significantly affect pension expense.
The discount rate used to measure pension obligations is determined by comparing the expected future benefits that will be paid under the plan with
yields available on high quality corporate bonds of similar duration. In lower interest rate environments, the sensitivity of pension expense to the assumed discount rate increases. The impact on pension expense of a 0.5% decrease in discount rate
in the current environment is $23 million per year. In contrast, the sensitivity to the same change in discount rate in a higher interest rate environment is less significant.
The expected long-term return on assets assumption also has a significant effect on pension expense. The expected return on plan assets is a long-term assumption established by considering historical and
anticipated returns of the asset classes invested in by the pension plan and the asset allocation policy currently in place. For purposes of setting and reviewing this assumption, long term refers to the period over which the plans
projected benefit obligations will be disbursed. We review this assumption at each measurement date and adjust it if warranted. Our selection process references certain historical data and the current environment, but primarily utilizes qualitative
judgment regarding future return expectations. Accordingly, we generally do not change the assumption unless we modify our investment strategy or identify events that would alter our expectations of future returns.
To evaluate the continued reasonableness of our assumption, we examine a variety of viewpoints and data. Various studies have shown that portfolios
comprised primarily of US equity securities have historically returned approximately 10%
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 35
annually over long periods of time, while US debt securities have returned approximately 6% annually over long periods. Application of these historical returns to the plans allocation
ranges for equities and bonds produces a result between 7.25% and 8.75% and is one point of reference, among many other factors, that is taken into consideration. We also examine the plans actual historical returns over various periods. Recent
experience is considered in our evaluation with appropriate consideration that, especially for short time periods, recent returns are not reliable indicators of future returns. While annual returns can vary significantly (rates of return for 2011,
2010, and 2009 were +.11%, +14.87%, and +20.61%, respectively), the selected assumption represents our estimated long-term average prospective returns.
Acknowledging the potentially wide range for this assumption, we also annually examine the assumption used by other companies with similar pension investment strategies, so that we can ascertain whether
our determinations markedly differ from others. In all cases, however, this data simply informs our process, which places the greatest emphasis on our qualitative judgment of future investment returns, given the conditions existing at each annual
measurement date.
As more fully described in our 2011 Form 10-K, the expected long-term return on plan assets for determining net periodic
pension cost for 2011 was 7.75%. We are maintaining our expected long-term return on plan assets at 7.75% for determining pension cost for 2012.
Under current accounting rules, the difference between expected long-term returns and actual returns is accumulated and amortized to pension expense over future periods. Each one percentage point
difference in actual return compared with our expected return causes expense in subsequent years to increase or decrease by up to $8 million as the impact is amortized into results of operations.
We currently estimate a pretax pension expense of $92 million in 2012 compared with pretax expense of $3 million in 2011. This year-over-year expected
increase is primarily due to the amortization impact of the unfavorable 2011 investment returns as compared with the expected long-term return assumption and the increase in obligations due to the drop in the discount rate. In addition, the estimate
for 2012 includes approximately $1 million for employees expected to join the plan after the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition upon attainment of certain eligibility criteria.
The table below reflects the estimated effects on pension expense of certain changes in annual assumptions, using 2012 estimated expense as a baseline.
Table 25: Pension Expense Sensitivity Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Assumption (a) |
|
Estimated Increase to 2012 Pension Expense (In
millions) |
|
.5% decrease in discount rate |
|
$ |
23 |
|
.5% decrease in expected long-term return on assets |
|
$ |
18 |
|
.5% increase in compensation rate |
|
$ |
2 |
|
(a) |
The impact is the effect of changing the specified assumption while holding all other assumptions constant. |
Our pension plan contribution requirements are not particularly sensitive to actuarial assumptions. Investment performance has the most impact on
contribution requirements and will drive the amount of permitted contributions in future years. Also, current law, including the provisions of the Pension Protection Act of 2006, sets limits as to both minimum and maximum contributions to the plan.
We do not expect to be required by law to make any contributions to the plan during 2012.
We maintain other defined benefit plans that have a
less significant effect on financial results, including various nonqualified supplemental retirement plans for certain employees.
RECOURSE AND REPURCHASE OBLIGATIONS
As discussed in Note 3 Loan Sale and
Servicing Activities and Variable Interest Entities in our 2011 Form 10-K, PNC has sold commercial mortgage and residential mortgage loans directly or indirectly in securitizations and whole-loan sale transactions with continuing involvement. One
form of continuing involvement includes certain recourse and loan repurchase obligations associated with the transferred assets in these transactions.
Commercial Mortgage Loan Recourse Obligations
We originate, close, and service
certain multi-family commercial mortgage loans which are sold to FNMA under FNMAs Delegated Underwriting and Servicing (DUS) program. We participated in a similar program with the FHLMC.
Under these programs, we generally assume up to a one-third pari passu risk of loss on unpaid principal balances through a loss share arrangement. At
March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the unpaid principal balance outstanding of loans sold as a participant in these programs was $13.2 billion and $13.0 billion, respectively. The potential maximum exposure under the loss share
arrangements was $4.0 billion at both March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. We maintain a reserve for estimated losses based on our exposure. The reserve for losses under these programs totaled $50 million and $47 million as of
March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, and
36 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
is included in Other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. If payment is required under these programs, we would not have a contractual interest in the collateral underlying the mortgage
loans on which losses occurred, although the value of the collateral is taken into account in determining our share of such losses. Our exposure and activity associated with these recourse obligations are reported in the Corporate &
Institutional Banking segment.
Residential mortgage loan and home equity repurchase obligations
While residential mortgage loans are sold on a non-recourse basis, we assume certain loan repurchase obligations associated with mortgage loans we have
sold to investors. These loan repurchase obligations primarily relate to situations where PNC is alleged to have breached certain origination covenants and representations and warranties made to purchasers of the loans in the respective purchase and
sale agreements. Residential mortgage loans covered by these loan repurchase obligations include first and second-lien mortgage loans we have sold through Agency securitizations, Non-Agency securitizations, and whole-loan sale transactions. As
discussed in Note 3 in our 2011 Form 10-K, Agency securitizations consist of mortgage loans sale transactions with FNMA, FHLMC, and the Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) program, while Non-Agency securitizations and whole-loan sale
transactions consist of mortgage loans sale transactions with private investors. Our historical exposure and activity associated with Agency securitization repurchase obligations has primarily been related to transactions with FNMA and FHLMC, as
indemnification and repurchase losses associated with Federal Housing Agency (FHA) and Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)-insured and uninsured loans pooled in GNMA securitizations historically have been minimal. Repurchase obligation activity
associated with residential mortgages is reported in the Residential Mortgage Banking segment.
PNCs repurchase obligations also include
certain brokered home equity loans/lines that were sold to a limited number of private investors in the financial services industry by National City prior to our acquisition. PNC is no longer engaged in the brokered home equity lending business, and
our exposure under these loan repurchase obligations is limited to repurchases of the whole-loans sold in these transactions. Repurchase activity associated with brokered home equity lines/loans are reported in the Non-Strategic Assets Portfolio
segment.
Loan covenants and representations and warranties are established through loan sale agreements with various investors to provide
assurance that PNC has sold loans to investors of sufficient investment quality. Key aspects of such covenants and representations and warranties include the loans compliance with any applicable loan criteria established for the transaction,
including underwriting standards, delivery of all required loan documents to the investor or its designated party, sufficient collateral valuation, and the validity of the
lien securing the loan. As a result of alleged breaches of these contractual obligations, investors may request PNC to indemnify them against losses on certain loans or to repurchase loans.
Indemnifications for loss or loan repurchases typically occur when, after review of the claim, we agree insufficient evidence exists to
dispute the investors claim that a breach of a loan covenant and representation and warranty has occurred, such breach has not been cured, and the effect of such breach is deemed to have had a material and adverse effect on the value of the
transferred loan. Depending on the sale agreement and upon proper notice from the investor, we typically respond to such indemnification and repurchase requests within 60 days, although final resolution of the claim may take a longer period of time.
With the exception of the sales agreements associated with the Agency securitizations, most sale agreements do not provide for penalties or other remedies if we do not respond timely to investor indemnification or repurchase requests.
Investor indemnification or repurchase claims are typically settled on an individual loan basis through make-whole payments or loan repurchases; however,
on occasion we may negotiate pooled settlements with investors. In connection with pooled settlements, we typically do not repurchase loans and the consummation of such transactions generally results in us no longer having indemnification and
repurchase exposure with the investor in the transaction.
The following table details the unpaid principal balance of our unresolved
indemnification and repurchase claims at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
Table 26: Analysis
of Unresolved Asserted Indemnification and Repurchase Claims
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
Mar. 31 2012 |
|
|
Dec. 31 2011 |
|
Residential mortgages: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency securitizations |
|
$ |
337 |
|
|
$ |
302 |
|
Private investors (a) |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
Home equity loans/lines: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private investors (b) |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
Total unresolved claims |
|
$ |
479 |
|
|
$ |
485 |
|
(a) |
Activity relates to loans sold through Non-Agency securitization and whole-loan sale transactions. |
(b) |
Activity relates to brokered home equity loans/lines sold through whole-loan sale transactions which occurred during 2005-2007. |
To mitigate losses associated with indemnification and repurchase claims, we have established quality assurance programs designed to ensure loans sold
meet specific underwriting and origination criteria provided for in the investor sale agreements. In addition, we investigate every investor claim on a loan by loan basis to determine the existence of a legitimate claim, and that all other
conditions for indemnification or repurchase have been met prior to the settlement with an investor.
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 37
The table below details our indemnification and repurchase claim settlement activity during the first three
months of 2012 and 2011.
Table 27: Analysis of Indemnification and Repurchase Claim Settlement Activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Three months ended March 31 - In millions |
|
Unpaid Principal Balance (a) |
|
|
Losses Incurred (b) |
|
|
Fair Value of Repurchased Loans (c) |
|
|
Unpaid Principal Balance (a) |
|
|
Losses Incurred (b) |
|
|
Fair Value of Repurchased Loans (c) |
|
Residential mortgages (d): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency securitizations |
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
24 |
|
Private investors (e) |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity loans/lines: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private investors - Repurchases (f) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total indemnification and repurchase settlements |
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
102 |
|
|
$ |
56 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
(a) |
Represents unpaid principal balance of loans at the indemnification or repurchase date. Excluded from these balances are amounts associated with pooled settlement
payments as loans are typically not repurchased in these transactions. |
(b) |
Represents both i) amounts paid for indemnification/settlement payments and ii) the difference between loan repurchase price and fair value of the loan at the
repurchase date. These losses are charged to the indemnification and repurchase liability. |
(c) |
Represents fair value of loans repurchased only as we have no exposure to changes in the fair value of loans or underlying collateral when indemnification/settlement
payments are made to investors. |
(d) |
Repurchase activity associated with insured loans, government-guaranteed loans, and loans repurchased through the exercise of our removal of account provision (ROAP)
option are excluded from this table. Refer to Note 3 in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in this Report for further discussion of ROAPs. |
(e) |
Activity relates to loans sold through Non-Agency securitizations and whole-loan sale transactions. |
(f) |
Activity relates to brokered home equity loans/lines sold through whole-loan sale transactions which occurred during 2005-2007. |
During 2011 and the first three months of 2012, unresolved and settled investor indemnification and
repurchase claims were primarily related to one of the following alleged breaches in representations and warranties: 1) misrepresentation of income, assets or employment; 2) property evaluation or status issues (e.g., appraisal, title, etc.); 3)
underwriting guideline violations; or 4) mortgage insurance rescissions. During 2011, the volume of residential mortgage indemnification and repurchase claims increased reflecting the prolonged weak residential housing sector and the continuing
industry trend of Agency investors pursuing strategies to aggressively reduce their exposure to losses on purchased loans. This increase, along with an increase in the average time to resolve investor claims, has contributed to the higher balances
of unresolved claims for residential mortgages in agency securitizations at March 31, 2012. The extended period of time to resolve these investor claims coupled with higher claim rescission rates drove the decline in residential mortgage
indemnification and repurchase settlement activity in 2011 and the first three months of 2012. As the level of residential mortgage claims increased over the past couple of years, management focused its efforts on improving its process to review and
respond to these claims. The lower balance of unresolved indemnification and repurchase claims for home equity loans/lines at March 31, 2012 was primarily attributed to pooled settlement activity in the second quarter of 2011 and higher claim
rescission rates. Management also implemented enhancements to its process of reviewing and responding to investor claims for this sold portfolio. The lower first quarter 2012 indemnification and repurchase settlement activity was also impacted by
higher claim rescission rates coupled with managements prior year strategy to settle investor repurchase claims.
For the first and second-lien mortgage balances of unresolved and settled claims contained in the tables
above, a significant amount of these claims were associated with sold loans originated through correspondent lender and broker origination channels. For the home equity loans/lines sold portfolio, all unresolved and settled claims relate to loans
originated through the broker origination channel. In certain instances when indemnification or repurchase claims are settled for these types of sold loans, we have recourse back to the correspondent lenders, brokers and other third-parties (e.g.,
contract underwriting companies, closing agents, appraisers, etc.). Depending on the underlying reason for the investor claim, we determine our ability to pursue recourse with these parties and file claims with them accordingly. Our historical
recourse recovery rate has been insignificant as our efforts have been impacted by the inability of such parties to reimburse us for their recourse obligations (e.g., their capital availability or whether they remain in business) or factors that
limit our ability to pursue recourse from these parties (e.g., contractual loss caps, statutes of limitations). Broker recourse activities, to the extent material, as well as the trends in unresolved claim and indemnification and repurchase activity
described above are considered in the determination of our estimated indemnification and repurchase liability detailed below.
Origination and
sale of residential mortgages is an ongoing business activity and, accordingly, management continually assesses the need to recognize indemnification and repurchase liabilities pursuant to the associated investor sale agreements. We establish
indemnification and repurchase liabilities for estimated losses on sold first and second-lien mortgages and home equity loans/lines for which indemnification is expected to be provided or for loans that are expected to be
38 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
repurchased. For the first and second-lien mortgage sold portfolio, we have established an indemnification and repurchase liability pursuant to investor sale agreements based on claims made and
our estimate of future claims on a loan by loan basis. These relate primarily to loans originated during 2006-2008. For the home equity loans/lines sold portfolio, we have established indemnification and repurchase liabilities based upon this same
methodology for loans sold during 2005-2007.
Indemnification and repurchase liabilities, which are included in Other liabilities on the
Consolidated Balance Sheet, are initially recognized when loans are sold to investors and are subsequently evaluated by management. Initial recognition and subsequent adjustments to the indemnification and repurchase liability for the sold
residential mortgage portfolio are recognized in Residential mortgage revenue on the Consolidated Income Statement. Since PNC is no longer engaged in the brokered home equity lending business, only subsequent adjustments are recognized to the home
equity loans/lines indemnification and repurchase liability. These adjustments are recognized in Other noninterest income on the Consolidated Income Statement.
Managements subsequent evaluation of these indemnification and repurchase liabilities is based upon trends in indemnification and repurchase requests, actual loss experience, risks in the underlying
serviced loan portfolios, and current economic conditions. As part of its evaluation, management considers estimated loss projections over the life of the subject loan portfolio. We believe our indemnification and repurchase liabilities
appropriately reflect the estimated probable losses on investor indemnification and repurchase claims at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the liability for estimated losses on indemnification and repurchase claims for residential mortgages totaled $101 million and $83 million, respectively.
The first quarter 2012 increase resulted from the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition which added $26 million to this liability and related to repurchase obligations on RBC Bank (USA) sold loans. Excluding this impact, the liability decreased from
December 31, 2011, reflecting the continuing seasoning of the sold portfolio and higher claim rescission rates as described above. This decrease was related solely to the period ended March 31, 2012 and resulted despite higher levels of
investor indemnification and repurchase claim activity. The indemnification and repurchase liability for home equity loans/lines was $51 million and $47 million at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The increase in this
liability was primarily driven by managements projection that home equity repurchases will be higher in 2012.
RISK MANAGEMENT
We encounter risk as part of the normal course of operating our business and we design
risk management processes to help manage these risks.
The Risk Management section included in Item 7 of our 2011 Form 10-K describes our risk management
philosophy, principles, governance and various aspects of our corporate-level risk management program. Additionally, our 2011 Form 10-K provides an analysis of our primary areas of risk: credit, operational, model, liquidity, and market, as well as
a discussion of our use of financial derivatives as part of our overall asset and liability risk management process, and addresses historical performance in appropriate places within the Risk Management section of that report.
The following information updates our 2011 Form 10-K risk management disclosures.
CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT
Credit risk
represents the possibility that a customer, counterparty or issuer may not perform in accordance with contractual terms. Credit risk is inherent in the financial services business and results from extending credit to customers, purchasing
securities, and entering into financial derivative transactions and certain guarantee contracts. Credit risk is one of our most significant risks. Our processes for managing credit risk are embedded in PNCs risk culture and in our
decision-making processes using a systematic approach whereby credit risks and related exposures are: identified and assessed; managed through specific policies and processes; measured and evaluated against our risk tolerance limits; and reported,
along with specific mitigation activities, to management and the board through our governance structure.
Asset Quality Overview
Overall asset quality trends for the first quarter of 2012 were stable from December 31, 2011 and improved over March 31,
2011 and included the following:
|
|
|
Overall loan delinquencies have decreased $275 million, or 6%, from year-end 2011 levels. |
|
|
|
Nonperforming loans increased $21 million, less than 1%, to $3.6 billion as of March 31, 2012 compared with December 31, 2011 mainly
attributable to a change in policy for home equity loans past due 90 days being placed on nonaccrual status, compared to the prior policy of past due 180 days. The increase was partially offset by a decline in total nonperforming commercial lending.
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming assets increased $205 million, or 5%, to $4.4 billion as of March 31, 2012, compared with December 31, 2011 primarily driven by
OREO assets due to the acquisition of RBC Bank (USA). |
|
|
|
First quarter 2012 net charge-offs were $333 million, down 38% from first quarter 2011 net charge-offs of $533 million. |
|
|
|
Reflecting improvements in overall asset quality from March 31, 2011 and continued actions to reduce exposure levels, the provision for credit
losses declined to $185 million for the first three months of 2012 compared with $421 million for the first three months of 2011.
|
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 39
|
|
|
The level of ALLL has decreased to $4.2 billion at March 31, 2012 from $4.8 billion at March 31, 2011. |
NONPERFORMING ASSETS AND LOAN DELINQUENCIES
Nonperforming Assets, including OREO and Foreclosed Assets
Nonperforming assets include nonaccrual loans and leases for which ultimate collectability of the full amount of contractual principal and interest is not probable and include TDRs, OREO and foreclosed
assets. Loans held for sale, certain government insured or guaranteed loans, purchased impaired loans and loans accounted for under the fair value option are excluded from nonperforming loans. Additional information regarding our nonaccrual policies
is included in Note 1 Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this Report. A summary of nonperforming assets is presented in the table below.
Nonperforming assets increased $205 million from December 31, 2011, to $4.4 billion at March 31, 2012. The increase in nonperforming assets at March 31, 2012 compared with year end was
primarily attributable to OREO added in the acquisition of RBC Bank (USA) and higher nonperforming home equity loans from a change in policy which places home equity loans on nonaccrual status when past due 90 days or more compared with 180 days
under the prior policy. This increase was partially offset by a decline in nonperforming commercial and commercial real estate loans. Nonperforming loans increased $21 million to $3.6 billion while OREO and foreclosed assets increased $184 million
to $780 million. The ratio of nonperforming assets to total loans, OREO and foreclosed assets decreased to 2.46% at March 31, 2012 from 2.60% at December 31, 2011 primarily as the increase in nonperforming loans was more than offset by the
increase in loans due to the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition. The ratio of nonperforming loans to total loans declined to 2.03% at March 31, 2012, compared to 2.24% at December 31, 2011. Total nonperforming assets have declined $2.0 billion, or
31%, from their peak of $6.4 billion at March 31, 2010.
Management continues to evaluate nonaccrual and charge off policies for
second-lien consumer loans (residential mortgages and home equity loans and lines) pursuant to interagency supervisory guidance on practices for loans and lines of credit secured by junior liens on 1-4 family residential properties. This may result
in future classification of performing second-lien consumer loans as nonperforming where the first-lien loan is 90 days or more past due. Such change in classification should not have a material impact on our allowance for loan and lease losses or
provision in future periods as the credit loss for these loans is considered in our reserving process.
At March 31, 2012, TDRs included
in nonperforming loans was $1.1 billion or 31% of total nonperforming loans compared to $1.1 billion or 32% of nonperforming loans as of December 31, 2011. Within consumer nonperforming loans, residential real estate TDRs comprise 44% of total
residential real estate nonperforming loans at March 31, 2012, down from 51% at December 31, 2011. Similarly, home equity TDRs
comprise 55% of home equity nonperforming loans at March 31, 2012, down from 77% at December 31, 2011. The level of TDRs in these portfolios is expected to result in elevated
nonperforming loan levels for longer periods because TDRs remain in nonperforming status until a borrower has made at least six consecutive months of payments under the modified terms or ultimate resolution occurs.
At March 31, 2012, our largest nonperforming asset was $45 million in the Real Estate Rental and Leasing Industry and our average nonperforming
loans associated with commercial lending was under $1 million. Our ten largest outstanding nonperforming assets are all from the commercial lending portfolio and represent 12% and 6% of total commercial lending nonperforming loans and total
nonperforming assets, respectively, as of March 31, 2012.
Table 28: Nonperforming Assets By Type
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
Mar. 31 2012 |
|
|
Dec. 31 2011 |
|
Nonperforming loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial lending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail/wholesale trade |
|
$ |
108 |
|
|
$ |
109 |
|
Manufacturing |
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
Service providers |
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
Real estate related (a) |
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
Financial services |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
Health care |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Other industries |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
Total commercial |
|
|
839 |
|
|
|
899 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate projects |
|
|
977 |
|
|
|
1,051 |
|
Commercial mortgage |
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
Total commercial real estate |
|
|
1,251 |
|
|
|
1,345 |
|
Equipment lease financing |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Total commercial lending |
|
|
2,111 |
|
|
|
2,266 |
|
Consumer lending (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity (c) |
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
529 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage (d) |
|
|
684 |
|
|
|
685 |
|
Residential construction |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
Credit card (e) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
Total consumer lending |
|
|
1,470 |
|
|
|
1,294 |
|
Total nonperforming loans (f) |
|
|
3,581 |
|
|
|
3,560 |
|
OREO and foreclosed assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate owned (OREO) (g) |
|
|
749 |
|
|
|
561 |
|
Foreclosed and other assets |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Total OREO and foreclosed assets |
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
596 |
|
Total nonperforming assets |
|
$ |
4,361 |
|
|
$ |
4,156 |
|
Amount of commercial lending nonperforming loans contractually current as to remaining principal and interest |
|
$ |
667 |
|
|
$ |
632 |
|
Percentage of total commercial nonperforming loans |
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
28 |
% |
Amount of TDRs included in nonperforming loans |
|
$ |
1,095 |
|
|
$ |
1,141 |
|
Percentage of total nonperforming loans |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
32 |
% |
Nonperforming loans to total loans |
|
|
2.03 |
% |
|
|
2.24 |
% |
Nonperforming assets to total loans, OREO and foreclosed assets |
|
|
2.46 |
|
|
|
2.60 |
|
Nonperforming assets to total assets |
|
|
1.47 |
|
|
|
1.53 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses to total nonperforming loans (f) (h) |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
40 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
(a) |
Includes loans related to customers in the real estate and construction industries. |
(b) |
Excludes most consumer loans and lines of credit, not secured by residential real estate, which are charged off after 120 to 180 days past due and are not placed on
nonperforming status. |
(c) |
In the first quarter of 2012, we adopted a policy stating that Home equity loans past due 90 days or more would be placed on nonaccrual status. Prior policy required
that these loans be past due 180 days before being placed on nonaccrual status. |
(d) |
Nonperforming residential mortgage excludes loans of $55 million and $61 million accounted for under the fair value option as of March 31, 2012 and
December 31, 2011, respectively. |
(e) |
Effective in the second quarter 2011, the commercial nonaccrual policy was applied to certain small business credit card balances. This change resulted in loans being
placed on nonaccrual status when they become 90 days or more past due. We continue to charge off these loans at 180 days past due. |
(f) |
Nonperforming loans exclude certain government insured or guaranteed loans, loans held for sale, loans accounted for under the fair value option and purchased impaired
loans. |
(g) |
Other real estate owned excludes $252 million and $280 million at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, related to residential real estate that
was acquired by us upon foreclosure of serviced loans because they are insured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) or guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). |
(h) |
The allowance for loan and lease losses includes impairment reserves attributable to purchased impaired loans. See Note 5 Asset Quality and Allowances for Loan and
Lease Losses and Unfunded Loan Commitments and Letters of Credit in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in this Report for additional information. |
Table 29: OREO and Foreclosed Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
Mar. 31 2012 |
|
|
Dec. 31 2011 |
|
Other real estate owned (OREO): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential properties |
|
$ |
215 |
|
|
$ |
191 |
|
Residential development properties |
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
Commercial properties |
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
Total OREO |
|
|
749 |
|
|
|
561 |
|
Foreclosed and other assets |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Total OREO and foreclosed assets |
|
$ |
780 |
|
|
$ |
596 |
|
Total OREO and foreclosed assets increased $184 million during the first three months of 2012 from $596 million at
December 31, 2011, to $780 million at March 31, 2012, which represents 18% of total nonperforming assets. As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, 28% and 32%, respectively, of our OREO and foreclosed assets were comprised of
single family residential properties. The higher level of OREO and foreclosed assets was driven mainly by the acquisition of RBC Bank (USA). This was partially offset by lower additions and higher sales related to commercial OREO. Excluded from OREO
at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, was $252 million and $280 million of residential real estate that was acquired by us upon foreclosure of serviced loans because they are insured by the Federal Housing Administration
(FHA) or guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).
Table 30: Change in Nonperforming Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
January 1 |
|
$ |
4,156 |
|
|
$ |
5,123 |
|
New nonperforming assets |
|
|
1,186 |
|
|
|
1,003 |
|
Charge-offs and valuation adjustments |
|
|
(236 |
) |
|
|
(390 |
) |
Principal activity, including paydowns and payoffs |
|
|
(414 |
) |
|
|
(380 |
) |
Asset sales and transfers to loans held for sale |
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
(178 |
) |
Returned to performing status |
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
(238 |
) |
March 31 |
|
$ |
4,361 |
|
|
$ |
4,940 |
|
The table above presents nonperforming asset activity for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011. For the
three months ended March 31, 2012, nonperforming assets increased $205 million from $4.2 billion at December 31, 2011, to $4.4 billion at March 31, 2012, driven primarily by other real estate owned added in the acquisition of RBC Bank
(USA) and higher nonperforming home equity loans arising from a change in policy which places home equity loans on nonaccrual status when past due 90 days or more compared with 180 days under the prior policy. These increases were partially offset
by a decline in nonperforming commercial real estate and commercial loans. Approximately 82% of total nonperforming loans are secured by collateral which would be expected to reduce credit losses and require less reserves in the event of default,
and 32% of commercial lending nonperforming loans are contractually current as to principal and interest. As of March 31, 2012, commercial nonperforming loans are carried at approximately 60% of their unpaid principal balance, due to
charge-offs recorded to date, before consideration of the allowance for loan and lease losses.
Purchased impaired loans are considered
performing, even if contractually past due (or if we do not expect to receive payment in full based on the original contractual terms), as we are currently accreting interest income over the expected life of the loans. The accretable yield
represents the excess of the expected cash flows on the loans at the measurement date over the carrying value. Generally decreases, other than interest rate decreases for variable rate notes, in the net present value of expected cash flows of
individual commercial or pooled purchased impaired loans would result in an impairment charge to the provision for loan losses in the period in which the change is deemed probable. Generally increases in the net present value of expected cash flows
of purchased impaired loans would first result in a recovery of previously recorded allowance for loan losses, to the extent applicable, and then an increase to accretable yield for the remaining life of the purchased impaired loans. Total
nonperforming loans and assets in the tables above are significantly lower than they would have been due to this accounting treatment for purchased impaired loans. This treatment also results in a lower ratio of nonperforming loans to total loans
and a higher ratio of ALLL to nonperforming loans. See Note 6 Purchased Loans in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in this Report for additional information on these loans.
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 41
Loan Delinquencies
We regularly monitor the level of loan delinquencies and believe these levels may be a key indicator of loan portfolio asset quality. Measurement of delinquency status is based on the contractual terms of
each loan. Loans that are 30 days or more past due in terms of payment are considered delinquent. Loan delinquencies exclude loans held for sale and purchased impaired loans, but include government insured or guaranteed loans.
Total early stage loan delinquencies (accruing loans past due 30 to 89 days) increased by $89 million from December 31, 2011, to $1.7 billion at
March 31, 2012. Commercial lending early stage delinquencies increased by $136 million from December 31, 2011, while consumer lending delinquencies decreased by $47 million. Deterioration in early stage delinquency levels was primarily due
to increases in commercial, commercial real estate and non government insured residential real estate loan classes related to the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition.
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more are referred to as late stage delinquencies. These loans are not
included in nonperforming loans and continue to accrue interest because they are well secured by collateral, are in the process of collection and are reasonably expected to result in repayment or restoration to current status, or are managed in
homogenous portfolios with specified charge-off timeframes adhering to regulatory guidelines. These loans decreased $364 million, or 12%, from $3.0 billion at December 31, 2011, to $2.6 billion at March 31, 2012, mainly due to the change
in policy for home equity loans and improvements in commercial loans and government insured delinquent residential real estate loans. The following tables display the delinquency status of our loans at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
Additional information regarding accruing loans past due is included in Note 5 Asset Quality and Allowances for Loan and Lease Losses and Unfunded Loan Commitments and Letters of Credit in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in this
Report.
Table 31: Accruing Loans Past Due 30 To 59 Days
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent of Total Outstandings |
|
Dollars in millions |
|
Mar. 31 2012 |
|
|
Dec. 31 2011 |
|
|
Mar. 31 2012 |
|
|
Dec. 31 2011 |
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
195 |
|
|
$ |
122 |
|
|
|
.26 |
% |
|
|
.19 |
% |
Commercial real estate |
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
.78 |
|
|
|
.59 |
|
Equipment lease financing |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
.38 |
|
|
|
.34 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
.49 |
|
|
|
.52 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non government insured |
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
1.37 |
|
|
|
1.24 |
|
Government insured |
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
.75 |
|
|
|
.84 |
|
Credit card |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
.83 |
|
|
|
.96 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non government insured |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
.26 |
|
|
|
.30 |
|
Government insured |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
.88 |
|
|
|
1.08 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,137 |
|
|
$ |
1,018 |
|
|
|
.65 |
|
|
|
.64 |
|
Table 32: Accruing Loans Past Due 60 To 89 Days
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent of Total Outstandings |
|
Dollars in millions |
|
Mar. 31
2012 |
|
|
Dec. 31 2011 |
|
|
Mar. 31 2012 |
|
|
Dec. 31 2011 |
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
$ |
47 |
|
|
|
.07 |
% |
|
|
.07 |
% |
Commercial real estate |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
.24 |
|
|
|
.22 |
|
Equipment lease financing |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
.03 |
|
|
|
.08 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
.29 |
|
|
|
.34 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non government insured |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
.45 |
|
|
|
.50 |
|
Government insured |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
.62 |
|
|
|
.72 |
|
Credit card |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
.59 |
|
|
|
.63 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non government insured |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
.10 |
|
|
|
.11 |
|
Government insured |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
.50 |
|
|
|
.65 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
517 |
|
|
$ |
547 |
|
|
|
.29 |
|
|
|
.34 |
|
42 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
Table 33: Accruing Loans Past Due 90 Days Or More
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent of Total Outstandings |
|
Dollars in millions |
|
Mar. 31 2012 |
|
|
Dec. 31 2011 |
|
|
Mar. 31 2012 |
|
|
Dec. 31 2011 |
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
|
.04 |
% |
|
|
.07 |
% |
Commercial real estate |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
.03 |
|
|
|
.04 |
|
Equipment lease financing |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.67 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non government insured |
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
.86 |
|
|
|
1.05 |
|
Government insured |
|
|
2,012 |
|
|
|
2,129 |
|
|
|
12.41 |
|
|
|
14.71 |
|
Credit card |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
1.15 |
|
|
|
1.21 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non government insured |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
.11 |
|
|
|
.12 |
|
Government insured |
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
1.80 |
|
|
|
1.80 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,609 |
|
|
$ |
2,973 |
|
|
|
1.48 |
|
|
|
1.87 |
|
(a) |
In the first quarter of 2012, we adopted a policy stating that Home equity loans past due 90 days or more would be placed on nonaccrual status. Prior policy required
that these loans be past due 180 days before being placed on nonaccrual status. |
On a regular basis our Special Asset Committee closely monitors loans, primarily commercial loans, that are
not included in the nonperforming or accruing past due categories and for which we are uncertain about the borrowers ability to comply with existing repayment terms over the next six months. These loans totaled $334 million at March 31,
2012 and $438 million at December 31, 2011.
Home Equity Loan Portfolio
Our home equity loan portfolio totaled $35.7 billion as of March 31, 2012, or 20% of the total loan portfolio. Of that total, $24.6 billion, or 69%,
was outstanding under primarily variable-rate home equity lines of credit and $11.1 billion, or 31%, consisted of closed-end home equity installment loans. Approximately 2% of the home equity portfolio was on nonperforming status as of
March 31, 2012.
As of March 31, 2012, we are in an originated first lien position for approximately 31% of the total portfolio and,
where originated as a second lien, we currently hold or service the first lien position for approximately an additional 2% of the portfolio. Historically, we have originated and sold first mortgages which has resulted in a low percentage of home
equity loans where we hold the first lien mortgage position. The remaining 67% of the portfolio was secured by second liens where we do not hold the first lien position. For the majority of the home equity portfolio where we are in, hold or service
the first lien position, the credit performance of this portion of the portfolio is superior to the portion of the portfolio where we hold the second lien position but do not hold the first lien.
Subsequent to origination, PNC is not typically notified when a senior lien position that is not held by PNC is satisfied. Therefore, information about
the current lien status of the loans is limited, for loans that were originated in subordinated
lien positions where PNC does not also hold the senior lien, to what can be obtained from external sources.
PNC contracted with a third-party service provider to provide updated loan, lien and collateral data that is aggregated from public and private sources. We started receiving the data in late 2011 and we
are working with the third-party provider to enhance the information we are receiving. As we have made progress in our efforts, we have incrementally enhanced our risk management processes and reporting to incorporate this updated loan, lien, and
collateral data, and we anticipate being substantially complete by the end of second quarter 2012.
We track borrower performance monthly and
other credit metrics at least quarterly, including historical performance of any mortgage loans regardless of lien position that we may or may not hold, updated FICO scores and original and updated LTVs. This information is used for internal risk
management reporting and monitoring. We segment the population into pools based on product type (e.g., home equity loans, brokered home equity loans, home equity lines of credit, brokered home equity lines of credit). We also further segment certain
loans based upon the delinquency status of any mortgage loan with the same borrower (regardless of whether it is a first lien senior to our second lien).
In establishing our ALLL, we utilize a delinquency roll-rate methodology for pools of loans. In accordance with accounting principles, under this methodology, we establish our allowance based upon
incurred losses and not lifetime expected losses. The roll-rate methodology estimates transition/roll of loan balances from one delinquency state (e.g., 30-59 days past due) to another delinquency state (e.g., 60-89 days past due) and ultimately
charge-off. The roll through to charge-off is based on PNCs actual loss experience for each type of pool. Since a pool may consist of first and second liens, the charge-off amounts for
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 43
the pool are proportionate to the composition of first and second liens in the pool. Our experience has been that the ratio of first to second lien loans has been consistent over time and is
appropriately represented in our pools used for roll-rate calculations.
Generally, our variable-rate home equity lines of credit have either
a seven or ten year draw period, followed by a 20 year amortization term. During the draw period, we have home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay interest only and home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay principal and interest. Based
upon outstanding balances at March 31, 2012, the following table presents the periods when home equity lines of credit draw periods are scheduled to end.
Table 34: Home Equity Lines of Credit Draw Period End Dates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
Interest Only Product |
|
|
Principal and Interest Product |
|
Remainder of 2012 |
|
$ |
895 |
|
|
$ |
175 |
|
2013 |
|
|
1,323 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
2014 |
|
|
2,112 |
|
|
|
593 |
|
2015 |
|
|
2,152 |
|
|
|
747 |
|
2016 |
|
|
1,671 |
|
|
|
594 |
|
2017 and thereafter |
|
|
6,166 |
|
|
|
7,246 |
|
Total (a) |
|
$ |
14,319 |
|
|
$ |
9,650 |
|
(a) |
Includes approximately $197 million, $97 million, $162 million, $176 million, $16 million and $293 million of home equity lines of credit with balloon payments with
draw periods scheduled to end in the remainder of 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017 and thereafter, respectively. |
We view
home equity lines of credit where borrowers are paying principal and interest under the draw period as less risky than those where the borrowers are paying interest only, as these borrowers have a demonstrated ability to make some level of principal
and interest payments.
Based upon outstanding balances, and excluding purchased impaired loans, at March 31, 2012, for home equity lines
of credit for which the borrower can no longer draw (e.g., draw period has ended or borrowing privileges have been terminated), approximately 6.69% were 30-89 days past due and approximately 6.06% were greater than or equal to 90 days past due.
Generally, when a borrower becomes 60 days past due, we terminate borrowing privileges, and those privileges are not subsequently reinstated. At that point, we continue our collection/recovery processes, which may include a loss mitigation loan
modification resulting in a loan that is classified as a TDR.
See Note 5 Asset Quality and Allowances for Loan and Lease Losses and Unfunded
Loan Commitments and Letters of Credit in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in this Report for additional information.
LOAN MODIFICATIONS AND TROUBLED DEBT RESTRUCTURINGS
Consumer Loan Modifications
We modify loans under government and PNC-developed programs based upon our commitment to help eligible
homeowners and borrowers avoid foreclosure, where appropriate. Initially, a borrower is evaluated for a modification under a government program. If a borrower does not qualify under a government
program, the borrower is then evaluated under a PNC program. Our programs utilize both temporary and permanent modifications and typically reduce the interest rate, extend the term and/or defer principal. Temporary and permanent modifications under
programs involving a change to loan terms are generally classified as TDRs. Further, certain payment plans and trial payment arrangements which do not include a contractual change to loan terms may be classified as TDRs. Additional detail on TDRs is
discussed below as well as in Note 5 Asset Quality and Allowances for Loan and Lease Losses and Unfunded Loan Commitments and Letters of Credit in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in this Report.
A temporary modification, with a term between three and 60 months, involves a change in original loan terms for a period of time and reverts to the
original loan terms as of a specific date or the occurrence of an event, such as a failure to pay in accordance with the terms of the modification. Typically, these modifications are for a period of up to 24 months after which the interest rate
reverts to the original loan rate. A permanent modification, with a term greater than 60 months, is a modification in which the terms of the original loan are changed. Permanent modifications primarily include the government-created Home Affordable
Modification Program (HAMP) or PNC-developed HAMP-like modification programs.
For consumer loan programs, such as residential mortgages and
home equity loans and lines, we will enter into a temporary modification when the borrower has indicated a temporary hardship and a willingness to bring current the delinquent loan balance. Examples of this situation often include delinquency due to
illness or death in the family, or a loss of employment. Permanent modifications are entered into when it is confirmed that the borrower does not possess the income necessary to continue making loan payments at the current amount, but our
expectation is that payments at lower amounts can be made. Residential mortgage and home equity loans and lines have been modified with changes in terms for up to 60 months, although the majority involve periods of three to 24 months.
We also monitor the success rates and delinquency status of our loan modification programs to assess their effectiveness in serving our customers
needs while mitigating credit losses. The following tables provide the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified consumer real estate related loans as well as the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified loans
that were 60 days or more past due as of six months, nine months, twelve months and fifteen months after the modification date.
44 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
Table 35: Bank-Owned Consumer Real Estate Related Loan Modifications
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2012 |
|
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
Dollars in millions |
|
Number of Accounts |
|
|
Unpaid Principal Balance |
|
|
Number of Accounts |
|
|
Unpaid Principal Balance |
|
Home equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temporary Modifications |
|
|
12,345 |
|
|
$ |
1,111 |
|
|
|
13,352 |
|
|
$ |
1,215 |
|
Permanent Modifications |
|
|
3,062 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
1,533 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
Total home equity |
|
|
15,407 |
|
|
|
1,311 |
|
|
|
14,885 |
|
|
|
1,307 |
|
Residential Mortgages |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Permanent Modifications |
|
|
8,364 |
|
|
|
1,453 |
|
|
|
7,473 |
|
|
|
1,342 |
|
Non-Prime Mortgages |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Permanent Modifications |
|
|
4,417 |
|
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
4,355 |
|
|
|
610 |
|
Residential Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Permanent Modifications |
|
|
1,371 |
|
|
|
590 |
|
|
|
1,282 |
|
|
|
578 |
|
Total Bank-Owned Consumer Real Estate Related Loan Modifications |
|
|
29,559 |
|
|
$ |
3,974 |
|
|
|
27,995 |
|
|
$ |
3,837 |
|
Table 36: Bank-Owned Consumer Real Estate Related Loan Modifications Re-Default by
Vintage (a) (b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
Twelve Months |
|
|
Fifteen Months |
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2012
Dollars in millions, except as noted |
|
Number of Accounts Re-defaulted |
|
|
% of Vintage Re-defaulted |
|
|
Number of Accounts Re-defaulted |
|
|
% of Vintage Re-defaulted |
|
|
Number of Accounts Re-defaulted |
|
|
% of Vintage Re-defaulted |
|
|
Number of Accounts Re-defaulted |
|
|
% of Vintage Re-defaulted |
|
|
Unpaid Principal Balance (c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Permanent Modifications |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter 2011 |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
Second Quarter 2011 |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
First Quarter 2011 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Fourth Quarter 2010 (d) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
25.7 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
22.9 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
25.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter 2010 (d) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
16.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Mortgages |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter 2011 |
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
22.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47.8 |
|
Second Quarter 2011 |
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
27.8 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
34.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81.5 |
|
First Quarter 2011 |
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
497 |
|
|
|
30.4 |
|
|
|
562 |
|
|
|
34.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91.2 |
|
Fourth Quarter 2010 |
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
27.9 |
|
|
|
655 |
|
|
|
36.2 |
|
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
37.8 |
|
|
|
112.3 |
|
Third Quarter 2010 |
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
24.1 |
|
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
28.8 |
|
|
|
647 |
|
|
|
33.9 |
|
|
|
737 |
|
|
|
38.6 |
|
|
|
117.7 |
|
Non-Prime Mortgages |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter 2011 |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
Second Quarter 2011 |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
26.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.1 |
|
First Quarter 2011 |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
24.4 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
28.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
Fourth Quarter 2010 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
24.2 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
28.4 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
30.5 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Third Quarter 2010 |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
21.0 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
26.0 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
28.4 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
Residential Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter 2011 (d) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter 2011 (d) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter 2011 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
Fourth Quarter 2010 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
Third Quarter 2010 |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temporary Modifications |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter 2011 |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6.2 |
|
Second Quarter 2011 |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
First Quarter 2011 |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
Fourth Quarter 2010 |
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
36.3 |
|
Third Quarter 2010 |
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
366 |
|
|
|
18.3 |
|
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
23.5 |
|
|
|
40.6 |
|
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 45
(a) |
An account is considered in re-default if it is 60 days or more delinquent after modification. The data in this table represents loan modifications completed during the
quarter ending September 30, 2010 through September 30, 2011 and represents a vintage look at all quarterly accounts and the number of those modified accounts (for each quarterly vintage) 60 days or more delinquent at six, nine, twelve,
and fifteen months after modification. Account totals include active and inactive accounts that were delinquent when they achieved inactive status. |
(b) |
Vintage refers to the quarter in which the modification occurred. |
(c) |
Reflects March 31, 2012 unpaid principal balances of the re-defaulted accounts for the Third Quarter 2011 Vintage at Six Months, for the Second Quarter 2011
Vintage at Nine Months, for First Quarter 2011 at Twelve Months, and for the Fourth Quarter 2010 and prior Vintages at Fifteen Months. |
(d) |
The unpaid principal balance for this vintage totals less than $1 million. |
In addition to temporary loan modifications, we may make available to a borrower a payment plan or a HAMP
trial payment period. Under a payment plan or a HAMP trial payment period, there is no change to the loans contractual terms so the borrower remains legally responsible for payment of the loan under its original terms. A payment plan involves
the borrower making payments that differ from the contractual payment amount for a short period of time, generally three months, during which time a borrower is brought current. Our motivation is to allow for repayment of an outstanding past due
amount through payment of additional amounts over the short period of time. Due to the short term nature of the payment plan there is a minimal impact to the ALLL.
Under a HAMP trial payment period, we allow a borrower to demonstrate successful payment performance before establishing an alternative payment amount. Subsequent to successful borrower performance under
the trial payment period, we will change a loans contractual terms. As the borrower is often already delinquent at the time of participation in the HAMP trial payment period, upon successful completion, there is not a significant increase in
the ALLL. If the trial payment period is unsuccessful, the loan will be charged off at the end of the trial payment period to its estimated fair value of the underlying collateral less costs to sell.
Residential conforming and certain residential construction loans have been permanently modified under HAMP or, if they do not qualify for a HAMP
modification, under PNC-developed programs, which in some cases may operate similarly to HAMP. These programs first require a reduction of the interest rate followed by an extension of term and, if appropriate, deferral of principal payments. As of
March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, 2,996 accounts with a balance of $510 million and 2,701 accounts with a balance of $478 million, respectively, of residential real estate loans have been modified under HAMP and were still outstanding
on our balance sheet.
We do not re-modify a defaulted modified loan except for subsequent significant life events, as defined by the Office
of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). A re-modified loan continues to be classified as a TDR for the remainder of its term regardless of subsequent payment performance.
Commercial Loan Modifications and Payment Plans
Modifications of terms for large
commercial loans are based on individual facts and circumstances. Commercial loan modifications may involve reduction of the interest rate,
extension of the term of the loan and/or forgiveness of principal. Modified large commercial loans are usually already nonperforming prior to modification.
Beginning in 2010, we established certain commercial loan modification and payment programs for small business loans, Small Business Administration
loans, and investment real estate loans. As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, $82 million and $81 million, respectively, in loan balances were covered under these modification and payment plan programs. Of these loan balances, $28
million and $24 million have been determined to be TDRs as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
Troubled Debt
Restructurings
A TDR is a loan whose terms have been restructured in a manner that grants a concession to a borrower experiencing
financial difficulties. TDRs typically result from our loss mitigation activities and include rate reductions, principal forgiveness, postponement/reduction of scheduled amortization, and extensions, which are intended to minimize economic loss and
to avoid foreclosure or repossession of collateral. For the three months ended March 31, 2012, $740 million of loans held for sale, loans accounted for under the fair value option, pooled purchased impaired loans, as well as certain consumer
government insured or guaranteed loans which were evaluated for TDR consideration, are not classified as TDRs. The comparable amount for the three months ended March 31, 2011 was $515 million.
Table 37: Summary of Troubled Debt Restructurings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
Mar. 31 2012 |
|
|
Dec. 31 2011 |
|
Consumer lending: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate-related |
|
$ |
1,521 |
|
|
$ |
1,492 |
|
Credit card (a) |
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Total consumer lending |
|
|
1,821 |
|
|
|
1,798 |
|
Total commercial lending |
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
Total TDRs |
|
$ |
2,233 |
|
|
$ |
2,203 |
|
Nonperforming |
|
$ |
1,095 |
|
|
$ |
1,141 |
|
Accruing (b) |
|
|
865 |
|
|
|
771 |
|
Credit card (a) |
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
Total TDRs |
|
$ |
2,233 |
|
|
$ |
2,203 |
|
(a) |
Includes credit cards and certain small business and consumer credit agreements whose terms have been restructured and are TDRs. However, since our policy is to exempt
these loans from being placed on nonaccrual status as permitted by regulatory guidance as generally these loans are directly charged off in the period that they become 180 days past due, these loans are excluded from nonperforming loans.
|
(b) |
Accruing loans have demonstrated a period of at least six months of performance under the restructured terms and are excluded from nonperforming loans.
|
46 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
Total TDRs increased $30 million or 1% during the first three months of 2012 to $2.2 billion as of
March 31, 2012. Of this total, nonperforming TDRs totaled $1.1 billion, which represents approximately 31% of total nonperforming loans.
TDRs that have returned to performing (accruing) status are excluded from nonperforming loans. These loans have demonstrated a period of at least six
months of consecutive performance under the restructured terms. These TDRs increased $94 million or 12% during the first three months of 2012 to $865 million as of March 31, 2012. This increase reflects the further seasoning and performance of
the TDRs. See Note 5 Asset Quality and Allowances for Loan and Lease Losses and Unfunded Loan Commitments and Letters of Credit in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this Report for additional information.
ALLOWANCES FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES AND
UNFUNDED LOAN COMMITMENTS AND LETTERS OF CREDIT
We recorded $333 million in net charge-offs for the first three months of 2012, compared to $533 million in the first three months of 2011. Commercial lending net charge-offs fell from $248 million in the
first three months of 2011 to $96 million in the first three months of 2012. Consumer lending net charge-offs declined from $285 million in the first three months of 2011 to $237 million in the first three months of 2012.
Table 38: Loan Charge-Offs And Recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
March 31 Dollars in
millions |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
Recoveries |
|
|
Net Charge-offs |
|
|
Percent of Average Loans |
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
|
.23 |
% |
Commercial real estate |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
1.46 |
|
Equipment lease financing |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(.25 |
) |
Home equity |
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
1.40 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
.84 |
|
Credit card |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
5.10 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
.79 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
467 |
|
|
$ |
134 |
|
|
$ |
333 |
|
|
|
.81 |
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
179 |
|
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
99 |
|
|
|
.71 |
% |
Commercial real estate |
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
3.33 |
|
Equipment lease financing |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
.32 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
1.57 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
1.49 |
|
Credit card |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
7.21 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
.73 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
674 |
|
|
$ |
141 |
|
|
$ |
533 |
|
|
|
1.44 |
|
Total net charge-offs are lower than they would have been otherwise due to the accounting treatment for
purchased impaired loans. This treatment also results in a lower ratio of net charge-offs to average loans. See Note 6 Purchased Loans in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in this Report for additional information on net charge-offs
related to these loans.
We maintain an ALLL to absorb losses from the loan portfolio and determine this allowance based on quarterly
assessments of the estimated probable credit losses incurred in the loan portfolio. We maintain the ALLL at a level that we believe to be appropriate to absorb estimated probable credit losses incurred in the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet
date. While we make allocations to specific loans and pools of loans, the total reserve is available for all loan and lease losses. Although quantitative modeling factors as discussed below are constantly changing as the financial strength of the
borrower and overall economic conditions change, there were no significant changes during the first three months of 2012 to the methodology we follow to determine our ALLL.
We establish specific allowances for loans considered impaired using methods prescribed by GAAP. All impaired loans are subject to individual analysis, except leases and large groups of smaller-balance
homogeneous loans which may include, but are not limited to, credit card, residential mortgage, and consumer installment loans. Specific allowances for individual loans (including commercial and consumer TDRs) are determined based on an analysis of
the present value of expected future cash flows from the loans discounted at their effective interest rate, observable market price, or the fair value of the underlying collateral.
Reserves allocated to non-impaired commercial loan classes are based on probability of default (PD) and loss given default (LGD) credit risk ratings.
Our pool reserve methodology is sensitive to changes in key risk parameters such as PD, LGD and exposure at date of default (EAD). In general, a given
change in any of the major risk parameters will have a corresponding change in the pool reserve allocations for non-impaired commercial loans. Our commercial loans are the largest category of credits and are most sensitive to changes in the key risk
parameters and pool reserve loss rates.
The majority of the commercial portfolio is secured by collateral, including loans to asset-based
lending customers that continue to show demonstrably lower LGD. Further, the large investment grade or equivalent portion of the loan portfolio has performed well and has not been subject to significant deterioration.
Allocations to non-impaired consumer loan classes are based upon a roll-rate model which uses statistical relationships,
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 47
calculated from historical data that estimate the movement of loan outstandings through the various stages of delinquency and ultimately charge-off.
A portion of the ALLL related to qualitative and measurement factors has been assigned to loan categories. These factors include, but are not limited to,
the following:
|
|
|
Industry concentrations and conditions, |
|
|
|
Recent credit quality trends, |
|
|
|
Recent loss experience in particular portfolios, |
|
|
|
Recent macro economic factors, |
|
|
|
Changes in risk selection and underwriting standards, and |
|
|
|
Timing of available information. |
In addition to the ALLL, we maintain an allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit. We report this allowance as a liability on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. We maintain the allowance
for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit at a level we believe is appropriate to absorb estimated probable losses on these unfunded credit facilities. We determine this amount using estimates of the probability of the ultimate funding and
losses related to those credit exposures. This methodology is very similar to the one we use for determining our ALLL.
We refer you to Note 5
Asset Quality and Allowances for Loan and Lease Losses and Unfunded Loan Commitments and Letters of Credit in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in this Report for further information on key asset quality indicators that we use to
evaluate our portfolio and establish the allowances.
Table 39: Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars in millions |
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
January 1 |
|
$ |
4,347 |
|
|
$ |
4,887 |
|
Total net charge-offs |
|
|
(333 |
) |
|
|
(533 |
) |
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
421 |
|
Net change in allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of
credit |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
March 31 |
|
$ |
4,196 |
|
|
$ |
4,759 |
|
Net charge-offs to average loans (for the three months ended) (annualized) |
|
|
.81 |
% |
|
|
1.44 |
% |
Allowance for loan and lease losses to total loans |
|
|
2.38 |
|
|
|
3.19 |
|
Commercial lending net charge-offs |
|
$ |
(96 |
) |
|
$ |
(248 |
) |
Consumer lending net charge-offs |
|
|
(237 |
) |
|
|
(285 |
) |
Total net charge-offs |
|
$ |
(333 |
) |
|
$ |
(533 |
) |
Net charge-offs to average loans (for the three months ended) (annualized) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial lending |
|
|
.42 |
% |
|
|
1.25 |
% |
Consumer lending |
|
|
1.32 |
|
|
|
1.65 |
|
As further described in the Consolidated Income Statement Review section of this Report, the provision for
credit losses totaled $185 million for the first three months of 2012 compared to $421 million for the first three months of 2011. For the first three months of 2012, the provision for commercial lending credit losses declined by $83 million or 65%
from the first three months of 2011. Similarly, the provision for consumer lending credit losses decreased $153 million or 52% from the first three months of 2011.
Purchased impaired loans are recorded at fair value and applicable accounting guidance prohibits the carry over or creation of valuation allowances at acquisition. Because the initial fair values of
these loans already reflect a credit component, additional reserves are established when performance is expected to be worse than our expectations as of the acquisition date. At March 31, 2012, we had established reserves of $991 million
for purchased impaired loans. In addition, all loans (purchased impaired and non-impaired) acquired in the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition were recorded at fair value. No allowance for loan losses was carried over and no allowance was created at
acquisition. See Note 6 Purchased Loans for additional information.
At March 31, 2012, total ALLL to total nonperforming loans was 117%.
The comparable amount for December 31, 2011 was 122%. The allowance allocated to consumer loans and lines of credit not secured by residential real estate and purchased impaired loans, which are both excluded from nonperforming loans, totaled
$1.4 billion at both March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. See the Nonperforming Assets By Type table within this Credit Risk Management section for additional information. Excluding these balances, the allowance as a percent of
nonperforming loans was 79% and 84% as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.
See Note 5 Asset Quality and
Allowances for Loan and Lease Losses and Unfunded Loan Commitments and Letters of Credit and Note 6 Purchased Loans in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements of this Report regarding changes in the ALLL and in the allowance for unfunded loan
commitments and letters of credit.
CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS
From a credit risk management perspective, we use credit default swaps (CDS) as a tool to manage risk concentrations in the credit portfolio. That risk
management could come from protection purchased or sold in the form of single name or index products. When we buy loss protection by purchasing a CDS, we pay a fee to the seller, or CDS counterparty, in return for the right to receive a payment if a
specified credit event occurs for a particular obligor or reference entity.
When we sell protection, we receive a CDS premium from the buyer
in return for PNCs obligation to pay the buyer if a
48 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
specified credit event occurs for a particular obligor or reference entity.
We evaluate
the counterparty credit worthiness for all our CDS activities. Counterparty credit lines are approved based on a review of credit quality in accordance with our traditional credit quality standards and credit policies. The credit risk of our
counterparties is monitored in the normal course of business. In addition, all counterparty credit lines are subject to collateral thresholds and exposures above these thresholds are secured.
CDSs are included in the Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under GAAP table in the Financial Derivatives section of this Risk Management discussion.
LIQUIDITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Liquidity risk has two fundamental components. The first is potential loss assuming we were unable to meet our funding requirements at a reasonable cost. The second is the potential inability to operate
our businesses because adequate contingent liquidity is not available in a stressed environment. We manage liquidity risk at the consolidated company level (bank, parent company, and nonbank subsidiaries combined) to help ensure that we can obtain
cost-effective funding to meet current and future obligations under both normal business as usual and stressful circumstances, and to help ensure that we maintain an appropriate level of contingent liquidity.
Spot and forward funding gap analyses are used to measure and monitor consolidated liquidity risk. Funding gaps represent the difference in projected
sources of liquidity available to offset projected uses. We calculate funding gaps for the overnight, thirty-day, ninety-day, one hundred eighty-day and one-year time intervals. Management also monitors liquidity through a series of early warning
indicators that may indicate a potential market, or PNC-specific, liquidity stress event. Finally, management performs a set of liquidity stress tests and maintains a contingency funding plan to address a potential liquidity crisis. In the most
severe liquidity stress simulation, we assume that PNCs liquidity position is under pressure, while the market in general is under systemic pressure. The simulation considers, among other things, the impact of restricted access to both secured
and unsecured external sources of funding, accelerated run-off of customer deposits, valuation pressure on assets, and heavy demand to fund contingent obligations. Risk limits are established within our Liquidity Risk Policy. Managements Asset
and Liability Committee regularly reviews compliance with the established limits.
Parent company liquidity guidelines are designed to help
ensure that sufficient liquidity is available to meet our parent company obligations over the succeeding 24-month period. Risk limits for parent company liquidity are established within our Enterprise Capital and Liquidity Management Policy. The
Board of Directors Risk Committee regularly reviews compliance with the established limits.
Bank Level Liquidity Uses
Obligations requiring the use of liquidity can
generally be characterized as either contractual or discretionary. At the bank level, primary contractual obligations include funding loan commitments, satisfying deposit withdrawal requests and maturities and debt service related to bank
borrowings. As of March 31, 2012, there were approximately $14.8 billion of bank borrowings with maturities of less than one year. We also maintain adequate bank liquidity to meet future potential loan demand and provide for other business
needs, as necessary. See the Bank Level Liquidity Sources section below.
Bank Level Liquidity Sources
Our largest source of bank liquidity on a consolidated basis is the deposit base that comes from our retail and commercial businesses. Total deposits
increased to $206.1 billion at March 31, 2012 from $188.0 billion at December 31, 2011, primarily due to the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition. Liquid assets and unused borrowing capacity from a number of sources are also available to maintain
our liquidity position. Borrowed funds come from a diverse mix of short and long-term funding sources.
At March 31, 2012, our liquid
assets consisted of short-term investments (Federal funds sold, resale agreements, trading securities, and interest-earning deposits with banks) totaling $6.1 billion and securities available for sale totaling $53.4 billion. Of our total liquid
assets of $59.5 billion, we had $23.9 billion pledged as collateral for borrowings, trust, and other commitments. The level of liquid assets fluctuates over time based on many factors, including market conditions, loan and deposit growth and active
balance sheet management.
In addition to the customer deposit base, which has historically provided the single largest source of relatively
stable and low-cost funding and liquid assets, the bank also obtains liquidity through the issuance of traditional forms of funding including long-term debt (senior notes and subordinated debt and FHLB advances) and short-term borrowings (Federal
funds purchased, securities sold under repurchase agreements, commercial paper issuances, and other short-term borrowings).
PNC Bank, N.A.
has the ability to offer up to $20 billion in senior and subordinated unsecured debt obligations with maturities of more than nine months. Through March 31, 2012, PNC Bank, N.A. had issued $7.0 billion of debt under this program of which $100
million of senior bank notes were issued March 5, 2012 and due April 8, 2015 with interest paid semi-annually at a fixed rate of 1.07%. Total senior and subordinated debt increased to $4.2 billion at March 31, 2012 from $4.1 billion
at December 31, 2011 due to issuances.
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 49
PNC Bank, N.A. is a member of the FHLB-Pittsburgh and as such has access to advances from FHLB-Pittsburgh
secured generally by residential mortgage and other mortgage-related loans. At March 31, 2012, our unused secured borrowing capacity was $8.1 billion with FHLB-Pittsburgh. Total FHLB borrowings increased to $ 9.0 billion at March 31, 2012
from $ 7.0 billion at December 31, 2011 due to $3.5 billion in new borrowings partially offset by maturities.
PNC Bank, N.A. has the
ability to offer up to $3.0 billion of its commercial paper to provide additional liquidity. As of March 31, 2012, there was $1.5 billion outstanding under this program. Other borrowed funds on our Consolidated Balance Sheet also includes $5.3
billion of commercial paper issued by Market Street Funding LLC, a consolidated VIE.
PNC Bank, N.A. can also borrow from the Federal Reserve
Bank of Clevelands (Federal Reserve Bank) discount window to meet short-term liquidity requirements. The Federal Reserve Bank, however, is not viewed as the primary means of funding our routine business activities, but rather as a potential
source of liquidity in a stressed environment or during a market disruption. These potential borrowings are secured by securities and commercial loans. At March 31, 2012, our unused secured borrowing capacity was $29.3 billion with the Federal
Reserve Bank.
Parent Company Liquidity Uses
Obligations requiring the use of liquidity can generally be characterized as either contractual or discretionary. The parent companys contractual obligations consist primarily of debt service
related to parent company borrowings and funding non-bank affiliates. As of March 31, 2012, there were approximately $3.3 billion of parent company borrowings with maturities of less than one year.
Additionally, the parent company maintains adequate liquidity to fund discretionary activities such as paying dividends to PNC shareholders, share
repurchases, and acquisitions. See the Parent Company Liquidity Sources section below. In March 2012, we used approximately $3.6 billion of parent company cash to acquire both RBC Bank (USA) and a credit card portfolio from RBC Bank
(Georgia), National Association.
See 2012 Capital and Liquidity Actions in the Executive Summary section of this Financial Review for
information regarding the Federal Reserves 2012 CCAR process, including their acceptance of the capital plan filed by PNC on January 9, 2012 and their not objecting to our capital actions proposed as part of that plan, as well as
additional information regarding our April 2012 increase to PNCs quarterly common stock dividend, our plans to purchase shares under PNCs existing common stock repurchase program during the remainder of 2012, our March 2012 issuance of
senior notes, our upcoming May 2012 redemption of $500 million of trust preferred securities, our April 2012 redemption of $306
million of trust preferred securities, and our April 2012 issuance of $1.5 billion of preferred stock. We did not repurchase any shares under PNCs existing common stock repurchase program
in the first quarter of 2012.
Parent Company Liquidity Sources
The principal source of parent company liquidity is the dividends it receives from its subsidiary bank, which may be impacted by the following:
|
|
|
Bank-level capital needs, |
|
|
|
Contractual restrictions, and |
The amount
available for dividend payments by PNC Bank, N.A. to the parent company without prior regulatory approval was approximately $1.3 billion at March 31, 2012. There are statutory and regulatory limitations on the ability of national banks to pay
dividends or make other capital distributions or to extend credit to the parent company or its non-bank subsidiaries. See Note 21 Regulatory Matters in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of our 2011 Form 10-K for a further
discussion of these limitations. Dividends may also be impacted by the banks capital needs and by contractual restrictions. We provide additional information on certain contractual restrictions under the Trust Preferred Securities
section of the Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements And Variable Interest Entities section of this Financial Review and in Note 13 Capital Securities of Subsidiary Trusts and Perpetual Trust Securities in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in
Item 8 of our 2011 Form 10-K.
In addition to dividends from PNC Bank, N.A., other sources of parent company liquidity include cash and
short-term investments, as well as dividends and loan repayments from other subsidiaries and dividends or distributions from equity investments. As of March 31, 2012, the parent company had approximately $4.8 billion in funds available from its
cash and short-term investments.
We can also generate liquidity for the parent company and PNCs non-bank subsidiaries through the
issuance of debt securities and equity securities, including certain capital securities, in public or private markets and commercial paper. We have effective shelf registration statements pursuant to which we can issue additional debt and equity
securities, including certain hybrid capital instruments. Total senior and subordinated debt and hybrid capital instruments increased to $16.1 billion at March 31, 2012 from $16.0 billion at December 31, 2011 due to $1.0 billion in new
borrowings partially offset by maturities.
During 2012 we issued the following securities under our shelf registration statement:
|
|
|
$1.0 billion of senior notes issued March 8, 2012 and due March 2022. Interest is paid semi-annually at a
|
50 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
|
|
fixed rate of 3.30%. The offering resulted in gross proceeds to us, before offering related expenses, of $990 million, |
|
|
|
Sixty million depositary shares, each representing a 1/4,000th interest in a share of our Fixed-to-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred
Stock, Series P, issued April 24, 2012, resulting in gross proceeds to us, before commissions and expenses, of $1.5 billion. |
The parent company, through its subsidiary PNC Funding Corp, has the ability to offer up to $3.0 billion of commercial paper to provide additional liquidity. As of March 31, 2012, there were no
issuances outstanding under this program.
Note 18 Equity in Item 8 of our 2011 Form 10-K describes the 16,885,192 warrants we have
outstanding, each to purchase one share of PNC common stock at an exercise price of $67.33 per share. These warrants were sold by the US Treasury in a secondary public offering in May 2010 after the US Treasury exchanged its TARP Warrant. These
warrants will expire December 31, 2018.
Status of Credit Ratings
The cost and availability of short-term and long-term funding, as well as collateral requirements for certain derivative instruments, is influenced by PNCs debt ratings.
In general, rating agencies base their ratings on many quantitative and qualitative factors, including
capital adequacy, liquidity, asset quality, business mix, level and quality of earnings, and the current legislative and regulatory environment, including implied government support. In addition, rating agencies themselves have been subject to
scrutiny arising from the financial crisis and could make or be required to make substantial changes to their ratings policies and practices, particularly in response to legislative and regulatory changes, including as a result of provisions in
Dodd-Frank. Potential changes in the legislative and regulatory environment and the timing of those changes could impact our ratings, which as noted above, could impact our liquidity and financial condition. A decrease, or potential decrease, in
credit ratings could impact access to the capital markets and/or increase the cost of debt, and thereby adversely affect liquidity and financial condition.
Table 40: Credit ratings as of March 31, 2012 for PNC and PNC Bank, N.A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moodys |
|
|
Standard & Poors |
|
|
Fitch |
|
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior debt |
|
|
A3 |
|
|
|
A- |
|
|
|
A+ |
|
Subordinated debt |
|
|
Baa1 |
|
|
|
BBB+ |
|
|
|
A |
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
Baa3 |
|
|
|
BBB |
|
|
|
BBB- |
|
|
|
|
|
PNC Bank, N.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated debt |
|
|
A3 |
|
|
|
A- |
|
|
|
A |
|
Long-term deposits |
|
|
A2 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
AA- |
|
Short-term deposits |
|
|
P-1 |
|
|
|
A-1 |
|
|
|
F1+ |
|
Commitments
The following tables set forth contractual obligations and various other commitments as of March 31, 2012 representing required and potential cash
outflows.
Table 41: Contractual Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment Due By Period |
|
March 31, 2012 in millions |
|
Total |
|
|
Less than one year |
|
|
One to three years |
|
|
Four to five years |
|
|
After five years |
|
Remaining contractual maturities of time deposits (a) |
|
$ |
31,615 |
|
|
$ |
22,158 |
|
|
$ |
5,589 |
|
|
$ |
2,311 |
|
|
$ |
1,557 |
|
Borrowed funds (a) (b) |
|
|
42,539 |
|
|
|
23,556 |
|
|
|
4,688 |
|
|
|
4,603 |
|
|
|
9,692 |
|
Minimum annual rentals on noncancellable leases |
|
|
2,794 |
|
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
655 |
|
|
|
474 |
|
|
|
1,286 |
|
Nonqualified pension and postretirement benefits |
|
|
558 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
Purchase obligations (c) |
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Total contractual cash obligations |
|
$ |
78,150 |
|
|
$ |
46,558 |
|
|
$ |
11,222 |
|
|
$ |
7,549 |
|
|
$ |
12,821 |
|
(a) |
Includes purchase accounting adjustments. |
(b) |
Includes basis adjustment relating to accounting hedges. |
(c) |
Includes purchase obligations for goods and services covered by noncancellable contracts and contracts including cancellation fees. |
At March 31, 2012, unrecognized tax benefits totaled $220 million. This liability for unrecognized tax benefits represents an estimate of tax
positions that we have taken in our tax returns which ultimately may not be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. Since the ultimate amount and timing of any future cash settlements cannot be predicted with reasonable certainty, this
estimated liability has been excluded from the contractual obligations table. See Note 15 Income Taxes in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements of this Report for additional information.
Our contractual obligations totaled $72.0 billion at December 31, 2011. The increase in the comparison is primarily attributable to the increase in
borrowed funds. See the Funding and Capital Sources section in the Consolidated Balance Sheet Review section of this Financial Review for additional information.
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 51
Table 42: Other Commitments (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount Of Commitment Expiration By Period |
|
March 31, 2012 in millions |
|
Total Amounts Committed |
|
|
Less than one year |
|
|
One to three years |
|
|
Four to five years |
|
|
After five years |
|
Net unfunded credit commitments |
|
$ |
112,454 |
|
|
$ |
50,432 |
|
|
$ |
35,377 |
|
|
$ |
26,040 |
|
|
$ |
605 |
|
Standby letters of credit (b) |
|
|
10,897 |
|
|
|
4,736 |
|
|
|
4,723 |
|
|
|
1,362 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
Reinsurance agreements (c) |
|
|
6,177 |
|
|
|
2,822 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
3,214 |
|
Other commitments (d) |
|
|
706 |
|
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Total commitments |
|
$ |
130,234 |
|
|
$ |
58,369 |
|
|
$ |
40,443 |
|
|
$ |
27,524 |
|
|
$ |
3,898 |
|
(a) |
Other commitments are funding commitments that could potentially require performance in the event of demands by third parties or contingent events. Loan commitments are
reported net of syndications, assignments and participations. |
(b) |
Includes $7.1 billion of standby letters of credit that support remarketing programs for customers variable rate demand notes. |
(c) |
Reinsurance agreements are with third-party insurers related to insurance sold to our customers. Balances represent estimates based on availability of financial
information. |
(d) |
Includes unfunded commitments related to private equity investments of $234 million and other investments of $4 million that are not on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Also includes commitments related to tax credit investments of $437 million and other direct equity investments of $31 million that are included in Other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. |
MARKET RISK MANAGEMENT
Market risk is the risk of a loss in earnings or economic value due to adverse movements in market factors such as interest rates, credit spreads, foreign
exchange rates, and equity prices. We are exposed to market risk primarily by our involvement in the following activities, among others:
|
|
|
Traditional banking activities of taking deposits and extending loans, |
|
|
|
Equity and other investments and activities whose economic values are directly impacted by market factors, and |
|
|
|
Trading in fixed income products, equities, derivatives, and foreign exchange, as a result of customer activities and underwriting.
|
We have established enterprise-wide policies and methodologies to identify, measure, monitor, and report market risk.
Market Risk Management provides independent oversight by monitoring compliance with these limits and guidelines, and reporting significant risks in the business to the Risk Committee of the Board.
MARKET RISK MANAGEMENT INTEREST RATE RISK
Interest rate risk results primarily from our traditional banking activities of gathering deposits and extending loans. Many factors,
including economic and financial conditions, movements in interest rates, and consumer preferences, affect the difference between the interest that we earn on assets and the interest that we pay on liabilities and the level of our
noninterest-bearing funding sources. Due to the repricing term mismatches and embedded options inherent in certain of these products, changes in market interest rates not only affect expected near-term earnings, but also the economic values of these
assets and liabilities.
Asset and Liability Management centrally manages interest rate risk as set forth in our risk management policies
approved by managements Asset and Liability Committee and the Risk Committee of the Board.
Sensitivity results and market interest rate benchmarks for the first quarters of 2012 and 2011 follow:
Table 43: Interest Sensitivity Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter 2012 |
|
|
First Quarter 2011 |
|
Net Interest Income Sensitivity Simulation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on net interest income in first year from gradual interest rate change over following 12 months of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 basis point increase |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
100 basis point decrease (a) |
|
|
(1.7 |
)% |
|
|
(.9 |
)% |
Effect on net interest income in second year from gradual interest rate change over the preceding 12 months of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 basis point increase |
|
|
7.1 |
% |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
100 basis point decrease (a) |
|
|
(4.9 |
)% |
|
|
(3.4 |
)% |
Duration of Equity Model (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base case duration of equity (in years): |
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Key Period-End Interest Rates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-month LIBOR |
|
|
.24 |
% |
|
|
.24 |
% |
Three-year swap |
|
|
.76 |
% |
|
|
1.47 |
% |
(a) |
Given the inherent limitations in certain of these measurement tools and techniques, results become less meaningful as interest rates approach zero.
|
In addition to measuring the effect on net interest income assuming parallel changes in current interest rates, we routinely
simulate the effects of a number of nonparallel interest rate environments. The following Net Interest Income Sensitivity to Alternative Rate Scenarios table reflects the percentage change in net interest income over the next two 12-month periods
assuming (i) the PNC Economists most likely rate forecast, (ii) implied market forward rates, and (iii) Yield Curve Slope Flattening (a 100 basis point yield curve slope flattening between 1-month and ten-year rates superimposed
on current base rates) scenario.
52 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
Table 44: Net Interest Income Sensitivity to Alternative Rate Scenarios
(First Quarter 2012)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PNC Economist |
|
|
Market Forward |
|
|
Slope Flattening |
|
First year sensitivity |
|
|
.1 |
% |
|
|
.6 |
% |
|
|
(.9 |
)% |
Second year sensitivity |
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
(3.6 |
)% |
All changes in forecasted net interest income are relative to results in a base rate scenario where current market rates
are assumed to remain unchanged over the forecast horizon.
When forecasting net interest income, we make assumptions about interest rates and
the shape of the yield curve, the volume and characteristics of new business, and the behavior of existing on- and off-balance sheet positions. These assumptions determine the future level of simulated net interest income in the base interest rate
scenario and the other interest rate scenarios presented in the above table. These simulations assume that as assets and liabilities mature, they are replaced or repriced at then current market rates. We also consider forward projections of purchase
accounting accretion when forecasting net interest income.
The following graph presents the yield curves for the base rate scenario and each
of the alternate scenarios one year forward.
The first quarter 2012 interest sensitivity analyses indicate that our Consolidated Balance Sheet is positioned to
benefit from an increase in interest rates and an upward sloping interest rate yield curve. We believe that we have the deposit funding base and balance sheet flexibility to adjust, where appropriate and permissible, to changing interest rates and
market conditions.
MARKET RISK MANAGEMENT TRADING
RISK
Our trading activities are primarily customer-driven trading in fixed income securities, derivatives and foreign
exchange contracts, as well as the daily mark-to-market impact from the credit valuation adjustment (CVA) on the customer derivatives portfolio. They also include the underwriting of fixed income and equity securities.
We use value-at-risk (VaR) as the primary means to measure and monitor market risk in trading activities.
We calculate a diversified VaR at a 95% confidence interval. We believe a diversified VaR is a better representation of risk than a non-diversified VaR as it reflects empirical correlations across different asset classes. PNC began to include the
daily mark-to-market impact from the CVA in determining the diversified VaR measure during the first quarter of 2012 and comparative periods are stated on a comparable basis.
During the first three months of 2012, our 95% VaR ranged between $3.3 million and $4.6 million, averaging $4.0 million. During the first three months of 2011, our 95% VaR ranged between $3.5 million and
$4.8 million, averaging $4.2 million.
To help ensure the integrity of the models used to calculate VaR for each portfolio and
enterprise-wide, we use a process known as backtesting. The backtesting process consists of comparing actual observations of trading-related gains or losses against the VaR levels that were calculated at the close of the prior day. Over a normal
business cycle, we would expect an average of twelve to thirteen instances a year in which actual losses exceeded the prior day VaR measure at the enterprise-wide level at a 95% confidence interval. There was one such instance during the first three
months of 2012 under our diversified VaR measure. In comparison, there were no such instances during the first three months of 2011. We use a 500 day look back period for backtesting and include customer related revenue. Including customer revenue
helps to reduce trading losses and may reduce the number of instances of actual losses exceeding the prior day VaR measure.
The following
graph shows a comparison of enterprise-wide trading-related gains and losses against prior day diversified VaR for the period.
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 53
Total trading revenue was as follows:
Table 47: Trading Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 In millions |
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Total trading revenue |
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
Securities underwriting and trading (a) |
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
Foreign exchange |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Financial derivatives and other |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Total trading revenue |
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
(a) |
Includes changes in fair value for certain loans accounted for at fair value. |
The trading revenue disclosed above includes results from providing investing and risk management services to our customers as well as results from hedges of customer activity. Trading revenue excludes
the impact of economic hedging activities which we transact to manage risk primarily related to residential mortgage servicing rights, residential and commercial mortgage loans held-for-sale, and certain residential mortgage-backed agency securities
with embedded derivatives. Derivatives used for economic hedges are not designated as accounting hedges because the contracts they are hedging are typically also carried at fair value on the balance sheet, resulting in symmetrical accounting
treatment for both the hedging instrument and the hedged item. Economic hedge results, along with the associated hedged items, are reported in the respective income statement line items, as appropriate.
Trading revenue for the first quarter of 2012 increased $20 million compared with the first quarter of 2011 primarily due to higher derivative and
foreign exchange client sales revenues and, to a lesser extent, securities underwriting and improved customer-driven trading results.
MARKET RISK MANAGEMENT EQUITY AND OTHER
INVESTMENT RISK
Equity investment risk is the risk of potential losses associated with investing in both
private and public equity markets. PNC invests primarily in private equity markets. In addition to extending credit, taking deposits, and underwriting and trading financial instruments, we make and manage direct investments in a variety of
transactions, including management buyouts, recapitalizations, and growth financings in a variety of industries. We also have investments in affiliated and non-affiliated funds that make similar investments in private equity and in debt and
equity-oriented hedge funds. The economic and/or book value of these investments and other assets such as loan servicing rights are directly affected by changes in market factors.
The primary risk measurement for equity and other investments is economic capital. Economic capital is a
common measure of risk for credit, market and operational risk. It is an estimate of the potential value depreciation over a one year horizon commensurate with solvency expectations of an institution rated single-A by the credit rating agencies.
Given the illiquid nature of many of these types of investments, it can be a challenge to determine their fair values. See Note 8 Fair Value in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in this Report for additional information.
Various PNC business units manage our equity and other investment activities. Our businesses are responsible for making investment decisions within the
approved policy limits and associated guidelines.
A summary of our equity investments follows:
Table 48: Equity Investments Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
Mar. 31 2012 |
|
|
Dec. 31 2011 |
|
BlackRock |
|
$ |
5,324 |
|
|
$ |
5,291 |
|
Tax credit investments |
|
|
2,818 |
|
|
|
2,646 |
|
Private equity |
|
|
1,510 |
|
|
|
1,491 |
|
Visa |
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
456 |
|
Other |
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
10,352 |
|
|
$ |
10,134 |
|
BlackRock
PNC owned approximately 36 million common stock equivalent shares of BlackRock equity at March 31, 2012, accounted for under the equity method. The primary risk measurement, similar to other
equity investments, is economic capital. The Business Segments Review section of this Financial Review includes additional information about BlackRock.
Tax Credit Investments
Included in our equity investments are tax credit
investments which are accounted for under the equity method. These investments, as well as equity investments held by consolidated partnerships, totaled $2.8 billion at March 31, 2012 and $2.6 billion at December 31, 2011.
Private Equity
The private
equity portfolio is an illiquid portfolio comprised of mezzanine and equity investments that vary by industry, stage and type of investment.
Private equity investments carried at estimated fair value totaled $1.5 billion at both March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. As of
March 31, 2012, $865 million was invested directly in a variety of companies and $645 million was invested indirectly through various private equity funds. Included in direct investments are investment activities of two
54 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
private equity funds that are consolidated for financial reporting purposes. The noncontrolling interests of these funds totaled $241 million as of March 31, 2012. The indirect private
equity funds are not redeemable, but PNC receives distributions over the life of the partnership from liquidation of the underlying investments by the investee. See Item 1 Business Supervision and Regulation and Item 1A Risk Factors
included in our 2011 Form 10-K for discussion of potential impacts of the Volcker Rule provisions of Dodd-Frank on our holding interests in and sponsorship of private equity or hedge funds.
Our unfunded commitments related to private equity totaled $234 million at March 31, 2012 compared with $247 million at December 31, 2011.
Visa
At March 31, 2012, our
investment in Visa Class B common shares totaled approximately 23 million shares. As of March 31, 2012, our recognized Visa indemnification liability was zero. As we continue to have an obligation to indemnify Visa for judgments and
settlements for the remaining specified litigation, we may have additional exposure to the specified Visa litigation.
As of March 31,
2012, we had a recorded investment of $459 million in Visa. Based on the March 31, 2012 closing price of $118.00 for the Visa Class A shares, the market value of our total investment was approximately $1.2 billion at the current conversion
ratio which considers all litigation funding by Visa to date. The Visa Class B common shares we own generally will not be transferable, except under limited circumstances, until they can be converted into shares of the publicly traded class of
stock, which cannot happen until the settlement of all of the specified litigation. It is expected that Visa will continue to adjust the conversion ratio of Visa Class B to Class A shares in connection with any settlements in excess of any
amounts then in escrow for that purpose and will also reduce the conversion ratio to the extent that it adds any funds to the escrow in the future.
Our 2011 Form 10-K has additional information regarding the October 2007 Visa restructuring, our involvement with judgment and loss sharing agreements with Visa and certain other banks, the status of
pending interchange litigation and other 2011 developments in this area. See also Note 17 Commitments and Guarantees in our Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements of this Report for information on our Visa indemnification obligation.
Other Investments
We also make investments in affiliated and non-affiliated funds with both traditional and alternative investment strategies. The economic values could be driven by either the fixed-income market or the
equity markets, or both. At March 31, 2012, other investments totaled $241 million compared with $250 million at December 31, 2011. We recognized net gains related to these investments of $15 million during both the first three months of
2012 and 2011.
Given the nature of these investments, if market conditions affecting their valuation were to worsen, we could incur future
losses.
Our unfunded commitments related to other investments totaled $4 million at March 31, 2012 and $3 million at December 31,
2011.
FINANCIAL DERIVATIVES
We use a variety of financial derivatives as part of the overall asset and liability risk management process to help manage interest rate, market and credit risk inherent in our business activities.
Substantially all such instruments are used to manage risk related to changes in interest rates. Interest rate and total return swaps, interest rate caps and floors, swaptions, options, forwards and futures contracts are the primary instruments we
use for interest rate risk management. We also enter into derivatives with customers to facilitate their risk management activities.
Financial derivatives involve, to varying degrees, interest rate, market and credit risk. For interest rate swaps and total return swaps, options and
futures contracts, only periodic cash payments and, with respect to options, premiums are exchanged. Therefore, cash requirements and exposure to credit risk are significantly less than the notional amount on these instruments.
Further information on our financial derivatives is presented in Note 1 Accounting Policies in our Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements under
Item 8 of our 2011 Form 10-K and in Note 12 Financial Derivatives in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in this Report, which is incorporated here by reference.
Not all elements of interest rate, market and credit risk are addressed through the use of financial or other derivatives, and such instruments may be ineffective for their intended purposes due to
unanticipated market changes, among other reasons.
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 55
The following table provides the notional or contractual amounts and estimated net fair value of financial
derivatives at March 31,2012 and December 31, 2011.
Table 49: Financial Derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2012 |
|
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
In millions |
|
Notional/ Contractual Amount |
|
|
Estimated Net Fair Value |
|
|
Notional/ Contractual Amount |
|
|
Estimated Net Fair Value |
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under GAAP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset rate conversion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receive fixed swaps |
|
$ |
14,115 |
|
|
$ |
497 |
|
|
$ |
13,902 |
|
|
$ |
529 |
|
Pay fixed swaps (c) |
|
|
1,996 |
|
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
1,797 |
|
|
|
(116 |
) |
Liability rate conversion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receive fixed swaps |
|
|
11,469 |
|
|
|
1,214 |
|
|
|
10,476 |
|
|
|
1,316 |
|
Forward purchase commitments |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2,733 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
Total interest rate risk management |
|
|
27,830 |
|
|
|
1,626 |
|
|
|
28,908 |
|
|
|
1,772 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FX forward (d) |
|
|
609 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments (b) |
|
$ |
28,439 |
|
|
$ |
1,614 |
|
|
$ |
29,234 |
|
|
$ |
1,772 |
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under GAAP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives used for residential mortgage banking activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps |
|
$ |
97,165 |
|
|
$ |
464 |
|
|
$ |
98,406 |
|
|
$ |
454 |
|
Futures |
|
|
61,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
Future options |
|
|
31,600 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bond options |
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Swaptions |
|
|
8,286 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
10,312 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
Commitments related to residential mortgage assets |
|
|
17,770 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
14,773 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
Total residential mortgage banking activities |
|
$ |
217,196 |
|
|
$ |
581 |
|
|
$ |
196,991 |
|
|
$ |
565 |
|
Derivatives used for commercial mortgage banking activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps |
|
$ |
1,385 |
|
|
$ |
(30 |
) |
|
$ |
1,180 |
|
|
$ |
(34 |
) |
Swaptions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Commitments related to commercial mortgage assets |
|
|
1,062 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Credit contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit default swaps |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Total commercial mortgage banking activities |
|
$ |
2,542 |
|
|
$ |
(13 |
) |
|
$ |
2,720 |
|
|
$ |
(21 |
) |
Derivatives used for customer-related activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps |
|
$ |
116,738 |
|
|
$ |
(175 |
) |
|
$ |
122,088 |
|
|
$ |
(214 |
) |
Caps/floors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sold |
|
|
4,715 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
5,861 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Purchased |
|
|
4,460 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
5,601 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Swaptions |
|
|
1,667 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
1,713 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
Futures |
|
|
4,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments related to residential mortgage assets |
|
|
1,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
13,373 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
11,920 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Equity contracts (d) |
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Credit contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk participation agreements |
|
|
3,463 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3,259 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Total customer-related |
|
$ |
150,341 |
|
|
$ |
(107 |
) |
|
$ |
158,095 |
|
|
$ |
(132 |
) |
Derivatives used for other risk management activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps |
|
$ |
1,527 |
|
|
$ |
(13 |
) |
|
$ |
1,704 |
|
|
$ |
(34 |
) |
Swaptions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Futures |
|
|
1,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
Future options |
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments related to residential mortgage assets |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Equity contracts |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit default swaps |
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Other contracts (d) (e) |
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
(318 |
) |
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
(296 |
) |
Total other risk management |
|
$ |
5,235 |
|
|
$ |
(333 |
) |
|
$ |
4,289 |
|
|
$ |
(327 |
) |
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments |
|
$ |
375,314 |
|
|
$ |
128 |
|
|
$ |
362,095 |
|
|
$ |
85 |
|
Total Gross Derivatives |
|
$ |
403,753 |
|
|
$ |
1,742 |
|
|
$ |
391,329 |
|
|
$ |
1,857 |
|
56 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
(a) |
The floating rate portion of interest rate contracts is based on money-market indices. As a percent of notional amount, 54% were based on 1-month LIBOR and 46% on
3-month LIBOR at March 31, 2012 compared with 57% and 43%, respectively, at December 31, 2011. |
(b) |
Fair value amount includes net accrued interest receivable of $130 million at March 31, 2012 and $140 million at December 31, 2011. |
(c) |
Includes zero-coupon swaps. |
(d) |
The increases in the negative fair values from December 31, 2011 to March 31, 2012 for foreign exchange, equity contracts and other contracts were due to the
changes in fair values of the existing contracts along with new contracts entered into during the 2012 period and contracts terminated during that period. |
(e) |
Includes PNCs obligation to fund a portion of certain BlackRock LTIP programs and other contracts. |
INTERNAL CONTROLS AND
DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of March 31, 2012, we performed an
evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures and of changes in our internal control over financial reporting.
Based on that evaluation, our Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer and our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) were effective as
of March 31, 2012, and that there has been no change in PNCs internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the first quarter of 2012 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
control over financial reporting.
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
Accretable net interest (Accretable yield) The excess of cash flows expected to be collected on a purchased impaired
loan over the carrying value of the loan. The accretable net interest is recognized into interest income over the remaining life of the loan using the constant effective yield method.
Adjusted average total assets Primarily comprised of total average quarterly (or annual) assets plus (less) unrealized losses (gains) on investment securities, less goodwill and certain
other intangible assets (net of eligible deferred taxes).
Annualized Adjusted to reflect a full year of activity.
Assets under management Assets over which we have sole or shared investment authority for our customers/clients. We do not include these
assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Basis point One hundredth of a percentage point.
Carrying value of purchased impaired loans The net value on the balance sheet which represents the recorded investment less any valuation
allowance.
Cash recoveries Cash recoveries used in the context of purchased impaired loans represent cash payments from
customers that exceeded the recorded investment of the designated impaired loan.
Charge-off Process of removing a loan or portion of a loan from our balance sheet because it
is considered uncollectible. We also record a charge-off when a loan is transferred from portfolio holdings to held for sale by reducing the loan carrying amount to the fair value of the loan, if fair value is less than carrying amount.
Combined Loan-to-value ratio (CLTV) This is the aggregate principal balance(s) of the mortgages on a property divided by its appraised
value or purchase price.
Commercial mortgage banking activities Includes commercial mortgage servicing, originating commercial
mortgages for sale and related hedging activities. Commercial mortgage banking activities revenue includes commercial mortgage servicing (including net interest income and noninterest income from loan servicing and ancillary services, net of
commercial mortgage servicing rights amortization, and commercial mortgage servicing rights valuations), and revenue derived from commercial mortgage loans intended for sale and related hedges (including loan origination fees, net interest income,
valuation adjustments and gains or losses on sales).
Common shareholders equity to total assets Common shareholders
equity divided by total assets. Common shareholders equity equals total shareholders equity less the liquidation value of preferred stock.
Core net interest income Total net interest income less purchase accounting accretion.
Credit derivatives Contractual agreements, primarily credit default swaps, that provide protection against a credit event of one or more referenced credits. The nature of a credit event is
established by the protection buyer and protection seller at the inception of a transaction, and such events include bankruptcy, insolvency and failure to meet payment obligations when due. The buyer of the credit derivative pays a periodic fee in
return for a payment by the protection seller upon the occurrence, if any, of a credit event.
Credit spread The difference in
yield between debt issues of similar maturity. The excess of yield attributable to credit spread is often used as a measure of relative creditworthiness, with a reduction in the credit spread reflecting an improvement in the borrowers
perceived creditworthiness.
Derivatives Financial contracts whose value is derived from changes in publicly traded securities,
interest rates, currency exchange rates or market indices. Derivatives cover a wide assortment of financial contracts, including but not limited to forward contracts, futures, options and swaps.
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 57
Duration of equity An estimate of the rate sensitivity of our economic value of equity. A
negative duration of equity is associated with asset sensitivity (i.e., positioned for rising interest rates), while a positive value implies liability sensitivity (i.e., positioned for declining interest rates). For example, if the
duration of equity is +1.5 years, the economic value of equity declines by 1.5% for each 100 basis point increase in interest rates.
Earning assets Assets that generate income, which include: Federal funds sold; resale agreements; trading securities; interest-earning
deposits with banks; loans held for sale; loans; investment securities; and certain other assets.
Economic capital Represents
the amount of resources that a business or business segment should hold to guard against potentially large losses that could cause insolvency and is based on a measurement of economic risk. The economic capital measurement process involves
converting a risk distribution to the capital that is required to support the risk, consistent with our target credit rating. As such, economic risk serves as a common currency of risk that allows us to compare different risks on a
similar basis.
Effective duration A measurement, expressed in years, that, when multiplied by a change in interest rates, would
approximate the percentage change in value of on- and off- balance sheet positions.
Efficiency Noninterest expense divided by
total revenue.
Fair value The price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
FICO score A credit bureau-based industry standard score
created by Fair Isaac Co. which predicts the likelihood of borrower default. We use FICO scores both in underwriting and assessing credit risk in our consumer lending portfolio. Lower FICO scores indicate likely higher risk of default, while higher
FICO scores indicate likely lower risk of default. FICO scores are updated on a periodic basis.
Foreign exchange contracts
Contracts that provide for the future receipt and delivery of foreign currency at previously agreed-upon terms.
Funds transfer pricing
A management accounting methodology designed to recognize the net interest income effects of sources and uses of funds provided by the assets and liabilities of a business segment. We assign these balances LIBOR-based funding rates at
origination that represent the interest cost for us to raise/invest funds with similar maturity and repricing structures.
Futures and forward contracts Contracts in which the buyer agrees to purchase and the seller
agrees to deliver a specific financial instrument at a predetermined price or yield. May be settled either in cash or by delivery of the underlying financial instrument.
GAAP Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Home Price Index (HPI) A broad measure of the movement of single-family house prices in the U.S.
Interest rate floors and caps Interest rate protection instruments that involve payment from the protection seller to the protection buyer
of an interest differential, which represents the difference between a short-term rate (e.g., three-month LIBOR) and an agreed-upon rate (the strike rate) applied to a notional principal amount.
Interest rate swap contracts Contracts that are entered into primarily as an asset/liability management strategy to reduce interest rate
risk. Interest rate swap contracts are exchanges of interest rate payments, such as fixed-rate payments for floating-rate payments, based on notional principal amounts.
Intrinsic value The difference between the price, if any, required to be paid for stock issued pursuant to an equity compensation arrangement and the fair market value of the underlying
stock.
Investment securities Collectively, securities available for sale and securities held to maturity.
Leverage ratio Tier 1 risk-based capital divided by adjusted average total assets.
LIBOR Acronym for London InterBank Offered Rate. LIBOR is the average interest rate charged when banks in the London wholesale money market
(or interbank market) borrow unsecured funds from each other. LIBOR rates are used as a benchmark for interest rates on a global basis. PNCs product set includes loans priced using LIBOR as a benchmark.
Loan-to-value ratio (LTV) A calculation of a loans collateral coverage that is used both in underwriting and assessing credit risk in
our lending portfolio. LTV is the sum total of loan obligations secured by collateral divided by the market value of that same collateral. Market values of the collateral are based on an independent valuation of the collateral. For example, an LTV
of less than 90% is better secured and has less credit risk than an LTV of greater than or equal to 90%.
Loss Given Default (LGD)
An estimate of recovery based on collateral type, collateral value, loan exposure, or the guarantor(s) quality and guaranty type (full or partial). Each loan has its own LGD. The LGD risk rating measures the percentage of exposure of a
specific credit obligation that we expect to lose if default occurs. LGD is net of recovery,
58 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
through either liquidation of collateral or deficiency judgments rendered from foreclosure or bankruptcy proceedings.
Net interest margin Annualized taxable-equivalent net interest income divided by average earning assets.
Nonaccretable difference Contractually required payments receivable on a purchased impaired loan in excess of the cash flows expected to be collected.
Nondiscretionary assets under administration Assets we hold for our customers/clients in a non-discretionary, custodial capacity. We do not
include these assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Nonperforming assets Nonperforming assets include nonperforming loans,
TDRs, and OREO and foreclosed assets, but exclude certain government insured or guaranteed loans, loans held for sale, loans accounted for under fair value option and purchased impaired loans. We do not accrue interest income on assets classified as
nonperforming.
Nonperforming loans Loans for which we do not accrue interest income. Nonperforming loans include loans to
commercial, commercial real estate, equipment lease financing, home equity, residential real estate, credit card and other consumer customers as well as TDRs which have not returned to performing status. Nonperforming loans exclude certain
government insured or guaranteed loans, loans held for sale, loans accounted for under the fair value option and purchased impaired loans. Nonperforming loans exclude purchased impaired loans as we are currently accreting interest income over the
expected life of the loans.
Notional amount A number of currency units, shares, or other units specified in a derivative
contract.
Operating leverage The period to period dollar or percentage change in total revenue (GAAP basis) less the dollar or
percentage change in noninterest expense. A positive variance indicates that revenue growth exceeded expense growth (i.e., positive operating leverage) while a negative variance implies expense growth exceeded revenue growth (i.e.,
negative operating leverage).
Options Contracts that grant the purchaser, for a premium payment, the right, but not the
obligation, to either purchase or sell the associated financial instrument at a set price during a specified period or at a specified date in the future.
Other real estate owned (OREO) and foreclosed assets Assets taken in settlement of troubled loans primarily through surrender or foreclosure. Foreclosed assets include real and personal
property, equity interests in corporations, partnerships, and limited liability companies.
Other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) When the fair value of a security is less than its
amortized cost basis, an assessment is performed to determine whether the impairment is other-than-temporary. If we intend to sell the security or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis
less any current-period credit loss, an other-than-temporary impairment is considered to have occurred. In such cases, an other-than-temporary impairment is recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the investments
amortized cost basis and its fair value at the balance sheet date. Further, if we do not expect to recover the entire amortized cost of the security, an other-than-temporary impairment is considered to have occurred. However for debt securities, if
we do not intend to sell the security and it is not more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before its recovery, the other-than-temporary loss is separated into (a) the amount representing the credit loss, and
(b) the amount related to all other factors. The other-than-temporary impairment related to credit losses is recognized in earnings while the amount related to all other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income, net of tax.
Parent company liquidity coverage Liquid assets divided by funding obligations within a two year period.
Pretax earnings Income from continuing operations before income taxes and noncontrolling interests.
Pretax, pre-provision earnings Total revenue less noninterest expense.
Primary client relationship A corporate banking client relationship with annual revenue generation of $10,000 to $50,000 or more, and for Asset Management Group, a client relationship with
annual revenue generation of $10,000 or more.
Probability of Default (PD) An internal risk rating that indicates the likelihood
that a credit obligor will enter into default status.
Purchase accounting accretion Accretion of the discounts and premiums on
acquired assets and liabilities. The purchase accounting accretion is recognized in net interest income over the weighted-average life of the financial instruments using the constant effective yield method. Accretion for purchased impaired loans
includes any cash recoveries received in excess of the recorded investment.
Purchased impaired loans Acquired loans determined
to be credit impaired under FASB ASC 310-30 (AICPA SOP 03-3). Loans are determined to be impaired if there is evidence of credit deterioration since origination and for which it is probable that all contractually required payments will not be
collected.
Recorded investment The initial investment of a purchased impaired loan plus interest accretion and less any cash
payments and writedowns to date. The recorded investment
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 59
excludes any valuation allowance which is included in our allowance for loan and lease losses.
Recovery Cash proceeds received on a loan that we had previously charged off. We credit the amount received to the allowance for loan and lease losses.
Residential development loans Project-specific loans to commercial customers for the construction or development of residential real estate
including land, single family homes, condominiums and other residential properties. This would exclude loans to commercial customers where proceeds are for general corporate purposes whether or not such facilities are secured.
Residential mortgage servicing rights hedge gains/(losses), net We have elected to measure acquired or originated residential mortgage
servicing rights (MSRs) at fair value under GAAP. We employ a risk management strategy designed to protect the economic value of MSRs from changes in interest rates. This strategy utilizes securities and a portfolio of derivative instruments to
hedge changes in the fair value of MSRs arising from changes in interest rates. These financial instruments are expected to have changes in fair value which are negatively correlated to the change in fair value of the MSR portfolio. Net MSR hedge
gains/(losses) represent the change in the fair value of MSRs, exclusive of changes due to time decay and payoffs, combined with the change in the fair value of the associated securities and derivative instruments.
Return on average assets Annualized net income divided by average assets.
Return on average capital Annualized net income divided by average capital.
Return on average common shareholders equity Annualized net income less preferred stock dividends, including preferred stock discount
accretion and redemptions, divided by average common shareholders equity.
Risk-weighted assets Computed by the assignment
of specific risk-weights (as defined by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System) to assets and off-balance sheet instruments.
Securitization The process of legally transforming financial assets into securities.
Servicing rights An intangible asset or liability created by an obligation to service assets for others. Typical servicing rights include
the right to receive a fee for collecting and forwarding payments on loans and related taxes and insurance premiums held in escrow.
Swaptions Contracts that grant the purchaser, for a premium payment, the right, but not the obligation, to enter into an interest rate swap
agreement during a specified period or at a specified date in the future.
Taxable-equivalent interest The interest income earned on certain assets is completely or
partially exempt from Federal income tax. As such, these tax-exempt instruments typically yield lower returns than taxable investments. To provide more meaningful comparisons of yields and margins for all interest-earning assets, we use interest
income on a taxable-equivalent basis in calculating average yields and net interest margins by increasing the interest income earned on tax-exempt assets to make it fully equivalent to interest income earned on other taxable investments. This
adjustment is not permitted under GAAP on the Consolidated Income Statement.
Tier 1 common capital Tier 1 risk-based capital,
less preferred equity, less trust preferred capital securities, and less noncontrolling interests.
Tier 1 common capital ratio
Tier 1 common capital divided by period-end risk-weighted assets.
Tier 1 risk-based capital Total shareholders equity,
plus trust preferred capital securities, plus certain noncontrolling interests that are held by others; less goodwill and certain other intangible assets (net of eligible deferred taxes relating to taxable and nontaxable combinations), less equity
investments in nonfinancial companies less ineligible servicing assets and less net unrealized holding losses on available for sale equity securities. Net unrealized holding gains on available for sale equity securities, net unrealized holding gains
(losses) on available for sale debt securities and net unrealized holding gains (losses) on cash flow hedge derivatives are excluded from total shareholders equity for Tier 1 risk-based capital purposes.
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio Tier 1 risk-based capital divided by period-end risk-weighted assets.
Total equity Total shareholders equity plus noncontrolling interests.
Total return swap A non-traditional swap where one party agrees to pay the other the total return of a defined underlying asset (e.g., a loan), usually in return for
receiving a stream of LIBOR-based cash flows. The total returns of the asset, including interest and any default shortfall, are passed through to the counterparty. The counterparty is therefore assuming the credit and economic risk of the underlying
asset.
Total risk-based capital Tier 1 risk-based capital plus qualifying subordinated debt and trust preferred securities,
other noncontrolling interest not qualified as Tier 1, eligible gains on available for sale equity securities and the allowance for loan and lease losses, subject to certain limitations.
Total risk-based capital ratio Total risk-based capital divided by period-end risk-weighted assets.
Transaction deposits The sum of interest-bearing money market deposits, interest-bearing demand deposits, and noninterest-bearing deposits.
60 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
Troubled debt restructuring (TDR) A loan whose terms have been restructured in a manner that
grants a concession to a borrower experiencing financial difficulties.
Value-at-risk (VaR) A statistically-based measure of
risk that describes the amount of potential loss which may be incurred due to severe and adverse market movements. The measure is of the maximum loss which should not be exceeded on 95 out of 100 days for a 95% VaR.
Watchlist A list of criticized loans, credit exposure or other assets compiled for internal monitoring purposes. We define criticized
exposure for this purpose as exposure with an internal risk rating of other assets especially mentioned, substandard, doubtful or loss.
Yield curve A graph showing the relationship between the yields on financial instruments or market indices of the same credit quality with
different maturities. For example, a normal or positive yield curve exists when long-term bonds have higher yields than short-term bonds. A flat yield curve exists when yields are the same for short-term and
long-term bonds. A steep yield curve exists when yields on long-term bonds are significantly higher than on short-term bonds. An inverted or negative yield curve exists when short-term bonds have higher yields
than long-term bonds.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
We make statements in this Report, and we may from time to time
make other statements, regarding our outlook for earnings, revenues, expenses, capital levels and ratios, liquidity levels, asset levels, asset quality, financial position and other matters regarding or affecting PNC and its future business and
operations that are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by words such as believe, plan, expect,
anticipate, see, look, intend, outlook, project, forecast, estimate, goal, will, should and other similar words and
expressions. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties, which change over time.
Forward-looking
statements speak only as of the date made. We do not assume any duty and do not undertake to update forward-looking statements. Actual results or future events could differ, possibly materially, from those anticipated in forward-looking statements,
as well as from historical performance.
Our forward-looking statements are subject to the following principal risks and uncertainties.
|
|
Our businesses, financial results and balance sheet values are affected by business and economic conditions, including the following:
|
|
|
|
Changes in interest rates and valuations in debt, equity and other financial markets. |
|
|
|
Disruptions in the liquidity and other functioning of U.S. and global financial markets. |
|
|
|
The impact on financial markets and the economy of the downgrade by Standard & Poors of U.S. Treasury obligations and other U.S.
government-backed debt, as well as issues surrounding the level of U.S. and European government debt and concerns regarding the creditworthiness of certain sovereign governments, supranationals and financial institutions in Europe.
|
|
|
|
Actions by Federal Reserve, U.S. Treasury and other government agencies, including those that impact money supply and market interest rates.
|
|
|
|
Changes in customers, suppliers and other counterparties performance and creditworthiness. |
|
|
|
Slowing or failure of the current moderate economic recovery. |
|
|
|
Continued effects of aftermath of recessionary conditions and uneven spread of positive impacts of recovery on the economy and our counterparties,
including adverse impacts on levels of unemployment, loan utilization rates, delinquencies, defaults and counterparty ability to meet credit and other obligations. |
|
|
|
Changes in customer preferences and behavior, whether due to changing business and economic conditions, legislative and regulatory initiatives, or
other factors. |
|
|
Our forward-looking financial statements are subject to the risk that economic and financial market conditions will be substantially different than we
are currently expecting. These statements are based on our current view that the moderate economic expansion will persist in 2012 and interest rates will remain very low. |
|
|
Legal and regulatory developments could have an impact on our ability to operate our businesses, financial condition, results of operations,
competitive position, reputation, or pursuit of attractive acquisition opportunities. Reputational impacts could affect matters such as business generation and retention, liquidity, funding, and ability to attract and retain management. These
developments could include: |
|
|
|
Changes resulting from legislative and regulatory reforms, including major reform of the regulatory oversight structure of the financial services
industry and changes to laws and regulations involving tax, pension, bankruptcy, consumer protection, and other industry aspects, and changes in accounting policies and principles. We will be impacted by extensive reforms provided for in the
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the
Dodd- |
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 61
|
|
Frank Act) and otherwise growing out of the recent financial crisis, the precise nature, extent and timing of which, and their impact on us, remains uncertain. |
|
|
|
Changes to regulations governing bank capital and liquidity standards, including due to the Dodd-Frank Act and to Basel III initiatives.
|
|
|
|
Unfavorable resolution of legal proceedings or other claims and regulatory and other governmental investigations or other inquiries. In addition to
matters relating to PNCs business and activities, such matters may include proceedings, claims, investigations, or inquiries relating to pre-acquisition business and activities of acquired companies, such as National City. These matters may
result in monetary judgments or settlements or other remedies, including fines, penalties, restitution or alterations in our business practices, and in additional expenses and collateral costs, and may cause reputational harm to PNC.
|
|
|
|
Results of the regulatory examination and supervision process, including our failure to satisfy requirements of agreements with governmental agencies.
|
|
|
|
Impact on business and operating results of any costs associated with obtaining rights in intellectual property claimed by others and of adequacy of
our intellectual property protection in general. |
|
|
Business and operating results are affected by our ability to identify and effectively manage risks inherent in our businesses, including, where
appropriate, through effective use of third-party insurance, derivatives, and capital management techniques, and to meet evolving regulatory capital standards. In particular, our results currently depend on our ability to manage elevated levels of
impaired assets. |
|
|
Business and operating results also include impacts relating to our equity interest in BlackRock, Inc. and rely to a significant extent on information
provided to us by BlackRock. Risks and uncertainties that could affect BlackRock are discussed in more detail by BlackRock in its SEC filings. |
|
|
Our acquisition of RBC Bank (USA) presents us with risks and uncertainties related to the integration of the acquired businesses into PNC, including:
|
|
|
|
Anticipated benefits of the transaction, including cost savings and strategic gains, may be significantly harder or take longer to achieve than
expected or may not be achieved in their entirety as a result of unexpected factors or events. |
|
|
|
Our ability to achieve anticipated results from this transaction is dependent also on the extent of credit losses in the acquired loan portfolios and
the extent of deposit attrition, in part related to the state of
|
|
|
economic and financial markets. Also, litigation and regulatory and other governmental investigations that may be filed or commenced, relating to pre-acquisition business and activities of RBC
Bank (USA), could impact the timing or realization of anticipated benefits to PNC. |
|
|
|
Integration of RBC Bank (USA)s business and operations into PNC may take longer than anticipated or be substantially more costly than anticipated
or have unanticipated adverse results relating to RBC Bank (USA)s or PNCs existing businesses. PNCs ability to integrate RBC Bank (USA) successfully may be adversely affected by the fact that this transaction results in PNC
entering several geographic markets where PNC did not previously have any meaningful retail presence. |
|
|
In addition to the RBC Bank (USA) transaction, we grow our business in part by acquiring from time to time other financial services companies,
financial services assets and related deposits and other liabilities. These other acquisitions often present risks and uncertainties analogous to those presented by the RBC Bank (USA) transaction. Acquisition risks include those presented by the
nature of the business acquired as well as risks and uncertainties related to the acquisition transactions themselves, regulatory issues, and the integration of the acquired businesses into PNC after closing. |
|
|
Competition can have an impact on customer acquisition, growth and retention and on credit spreads and product pricing, which can affect market share,
deposits and revenues. Industry restructuring in the current environment could also impact our business and financial performance through changes in counterparty creditworthiness and performance and in the competitive and regulatory landscape. Our
ability to anticipate and respond to technological changes can also impact our ability to respond to customer needs and meet competitive demands. |
|
|
Business and operating results can also be affected by widespread disasters, dislocations, terrorist activities or international hostilities through
impacts on the economy and financial markets generally or on us or our counterparties specifically. |
We provide greater
detail regarding some of these factors in our 2011 Form 10-K and elsewhere in this Report, including in the Risk Factors and Risk Management sections and the Legal Proceedings and Commitments and Guarantees Notes of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements in those reports. Our forward-looking statements may also be subject to other risks and uncertainties, including those discussed elsewhere in this Report or in our other filings with the SEC.
62 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT
THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions, except per share data
Unaudited |
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Interest Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
1,951 |
|
|
$ |
1,884 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
578 |
|
Other |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
Total interest income |
|
|
2,597 |
|
|
|
2,583 |
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
Borrowed funds |
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
407 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
2,291 |
|
|
|
2,176 |
|
Noninterest Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset management |
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
263 |
|
Consumer services |
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
Corporate services |
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
Service charges on deposits |
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
Net gains on sales of securities |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
Other-than-temporary impairments |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
Less: Noncredit portion of other-than-temporary impairments (a) |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Net other-than-temporary impairments |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(34 |
) |
Other |
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
343 |
|
Total noninterest income |
|
|
1,441 |
|
|
|
1,455 |
|
Total revenue |
|
|
3,732 |
|
|
|
3,631 |
|
Provision For Credit Losses |
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
421 |
|
Noninterest Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel |
|
|
1,111 |
|
|
|
989 |
|
Occupancy |
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
Marketing |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Other |
|
|
911 |
|
|
|
681 |
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
2,455 |
|
|
|
2,070 |
|
Income before income taxes and noncontrolling interests |
|
|
1,092 |
|
|
|
1,140 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
308 |
|
Net income |
|
|
811 |
|
|
|
832 |
|
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Preferred stock dividends and discount accretion |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
766 |
|
|
$ |
833 |
|
Earnings Per Common Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
1.45 |
|
|
$ |
1.59 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
1.44 |
|
|
|
1.57 |
|
Average Common Shares Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
524 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
526 |
|
(a) |
Included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). |
See accompanying Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements.
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 63
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions Unaudited |
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
811 |
|
|
$ |
832 |
|
Other comprehensive income, before tax and net of reclassifications into Net income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains on OTTI debt securities |
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
Net unrealized gains on non-OTTI securities |
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Net unrealized losses on cash flow hedge derivatives |
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
(108 |
) |
Pension, other postretirement and postemployment benefit plan adjustments |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Other |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
Other comprehensive income, before tax and net of reclassifications into Net
income |
|
|
614 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
Income tax expense related to items of other comprehensive income |
|
|
(228 |
) |
|
|
(78 |
) |
Other comprehensive income, after tax and net of reclassifications into Net
income |
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
1,197 |
|
|
|
954 |
|
Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling
interests |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Comprehensive income attributable to PNC |
|
$ |
1,191 |
|
|
$ |
959 |
|
See accompanying Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements.
64 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions, except par value Unaudited |
|
March 31 2012 |
|
|
December 31 2011 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks (includes $7 and $7 for VIEs) (a) |
|
$ |
4,162 |
|
|
$ |
4,105 |
|
Federal funds sold and resale agreements (includes $688 and $732 measured at fair value) (b) |
|
|
1,371 |
|
|
|
2,205 |
|
Trading securities |
|
|
2,639 |
|
|
|
2,513 |
|
Interest-earning deposits with banks (includes $8 and $325 for VIEs) (a) |
|
|
2,084 |
|
|
|
1,169 |
|
Loans held for sale (includes $2,227 and $2,365 measured at fair value) (b) |
|
|
2,456 |
|
|
|
2,936 |
|
Investment securities (includes $109 and $109 for VIEs) (a) |
|
|
64,554 |
|
|
|
60,634 |
|
Loans (includes $7,032 and $6,096 for VIEs) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(includes $273 and $227 measured at fair value) (a) (b) |
|
|
176,214 |
|
|
|
159,014 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses (includes $(73) and $(91) for VIEs)
(a) |
|
|
(4,196 |
) |
|
|
(4,347 |
) |
Net loans |
|
|
172,018 |
|
|
|
154,667 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
9,169 |
|
|
|
8,285 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
2,019 |
|
|
|
1,859 |
|
Equity investments (includes $1,741 and $1,643 for VIEs) (a) |
|
|
10,352 |
|
|
|
10,134 |
|
Other (includes $1,231 and $1,205 for VIEs) (includes $241 and $210 measured at fair
value) (a) (b) |
|
|
25,059 |
|
|
|
22,698 |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
295,883 |
|
|
$ |
271,205 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing |
|
$ |
62,463 |
|
|
$ |
59,048 |
|
Interest-bearing |
|
|
143,664 |
|
|
|
128,918 |
|
Total deposits |
|
|
206,127 |
|
|
|
187,966 |
|
Borrowed funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements |
|
|
4,832 |
|
|
|
2,984 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings |
|
|
8,957 |
|
|
|
6,967 |
|
Bank notes and senior debt |
|
|
12,065 |
|
|
|
11,793 |
|
Subordinated debt |
|
|
8,221 |
|
|
|
8,321 |
|
Other (includes $5,546 and $4,777 for VIEs) (a) |
|
|
8,464 |
|
|
|
6,639 |
|
Total borrowed funds |
|
|
42,539 |
|
|
|
36,704 |
|
Allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit |
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
Accrued expenses (includes $173 and $155 for VIEs) (a) |
|
|
3,607 |
|
|
|
4,175 |
|
Other (includes $807 and $734 for VIEs) (a) |
|
|
5,131 |
|
|
|
4,874 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
257,647 |
|
|
|
233,959 |
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock (c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock ($5 par value, authorized 800 shares, issued 537 shares) |
|
|
2,685 |
|
|
|
2,683 |
|
Capital surplus preferred stock |
|
|
1,638 |
|
|
|
1,637 |
|
Capital surplus common stock and other |
|
|
12,074 |
|
|
|
12,072 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
18,834 |
|
|
|
18,253 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
(105 |
) |
Common stock held in treasury at cost: 9 and 10 shares |
|
|
(467 |
) |
|
|
(487 |
) |
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
35,045 |
|
|
|
34,053 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
3,191 |
|
|
|
3,193 |
|
Total equity |
|
|
38,236 |
|
|
|
37,246 |
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
295,883 |
|
|
$ |
271,205 |
|
(a) |
Amounts represent the assets or liabilities of consolidated variable interest entities (VIEs). |
(b) |
Amounts represent items for which the Corporation has elected the fair value option. |
(c) |
Par value less than $.5 million at each date. |
See accompanying Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements.
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 65
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions Unaudited |
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
811 |
|
|
$ |
832 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided (used) by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
421 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
Net gains on sales of securities |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
Net other-than-temporary impairments |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights valuation adjustment |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
Undistributed earnings of BlackRock |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net change in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities and other short-term investments |
|
|
1,131 |
|
|
|
(294 |
) |
Loans held for sale |
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
(291 |
) |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(411 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities |
|
|
2,764 |
|
|
|
727 |
|
Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
3,492 |
|
|
|
8,018 |
|
Loans |
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
590 |
|
Repayments/maturities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
1,994 |
|
|
|
1,590 |
|
Securities held to maturity |
|
|
836 |
|
|
|
506 |
|
Purchases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
(6,948 |
) |
|
|
(7,237 |
) |
Securities held to maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
Loans |
|
|
(388 |
) |
|
|
(417 |
) |
Net change in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold and resale agreements |
|
|
830 |
|
|
|
1,456 |
|
Interest-earning deposits with banks |
|
|
(626 |
) |
|
|
251 |
|
Loans |
|
|
(3,346 |
) |
|
|
458 |
|
Net cash paid for acquisition activity |
|
|
(3,329 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(80 |
) |
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities |
|
|
(7,108 |
) |
|
|
5,113 |
|
66 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
(continued on following page)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
(continued from previous page)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions Unaudited |
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
$ |
(757 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,266 |
) |
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
867 |
|
|
|
(88 |
) |
Federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
Other borrowed funds |
|
|
1,095 |
|
|
|
(1,361 |
) |
Sales/issuances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bank notes and senior debt |
|
|
1,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other borrowed funds |
|
|
4,336 |
|
|
|
2,201 |
|
Common and treasury stock |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Repayments/maturities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings |
|
|
(3,980 |
) |
|
|
(1,023 |
) |
Bank notes and senior debt |
|
|
(770 |
) |
|
|
(1,525 |
) |
Subordinated debt |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(480 |
) |
Other borrowed funds |
|
|
(3,792 |
) |
|
|
(2,068 |
) |
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of treasury stock |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
Preferred stock cash dividends paid |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
Common stock cash dividends paid |
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities |
|
|
4,401 |
|
|
|
(5,748 |
) |
Net Increase (Decrease) In Cash And Due From Banks |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period |
|
|
4,105 |
|
|
|
3,297 |
|
Cash and due from banks at end of period |
|
$ |
4,162 |
|
|
$ |
3,389 |
|
Supplemental Disclosures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
338 |
|
|
$ |
445 |
|
Income taxes paid |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
Income taxes refunded |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Non-cash Investing and Financing Items |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer from loans to loans held for sale, net |
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
Transfer from loans to foreclosed assets |
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
See accompanying Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements.
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 67
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES
GROUP, INC.
BUSINESS
PNC is one of the largest diversified financial services companies in the United States and is headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
PNC has businesses engaged in retail banking, corporate and institutional banking, asset management, and residential mortgage banking, providing many of its products and services nationally and others in
PNCs primary geographic markets located in Pennsylvania, Ohio, New Jersey, Michigan, Illinois, Maryland, Indiana, North Carolina, Florida, Kentucky, Washington, D.C., Alabama, Delaware, Georgia, Virginia, Missouri, Wisconsin and South
Carolina. PNC also provides certain products and services internationally.
NOTE 1 ACCOUNTING POLICIES
BASIS OF FINANCIAL STATEMENT PRESENTATION
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the parent company and its subsidiaries, most of which are wholly owned,
and certain partnership interests and variable interest entities.
We prepared these consolidated financial statements in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). We have eliminated intercompany accounts and transactions. We have also reclassified certain prior year amounts to conform to the 2012 presentation. These
reclassifications did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
As described in Note 2
Acquisition and Divestiture Activity, on March 2, 2012, PNC acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding common stock of RBC Bank (USA), the US retail banking subsidiary of Royal Bank of Canada. As part of the acquisition, PNC also purchased a
credit card portfolio from RBC Bank (Georgia), National Association. The transaction added approximately $18.1 billion of deposits and $14.5 billion of loans to PNCs Consolidated Balance Sheet.
In our opinion, the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements reflect all normal, recurring adjustments needed to present fairly our results
for the interim periods. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year or any other interim period.
When preparing these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements, we have assumed that you have read the audited consolidated financial statements included in our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K
as amended by Amendment
No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (2011 Form 10-K). Reference is made to Note 1 Accounting Policies in the 2011 Form 10-K for a detailed description of significant accounting policies. There have been no
significant changes to these policies in the first three months of 2012 other than as disclosed herein. These interim consolidated financial statements serve to update the 2011 Form 10-K and may not include all information and notes necessary to
constitute a complete set of financial statements.
We have considered the impact on these consolidated financial statements of subsequent
events.
USE OF ESTIMATES
We prepared these consolidated financial statements using financial information available at the time, which requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported. Our most
significant estimates pertain to our fair value measurements, allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit, and accretion on purchased impaired loans. Actual results may differ from the estimates and the
differences may be material to the consolidated financial statements.
INVESTMENT IN
BLACKROCK, INC.
We account for our investment in the common stock and Series B Preferred
Stock of BlackRock (deemed to be in-substance common stock) under the equity method of accounting. The investment in BlackRock is reflected on our Consolidated Balance Sheet in Equity investments, while our equity in earnings of BlackRock is
reported on our Consolidated Income Statement in Asset management revenue.
We also own approximately 1.5 million shares of Series C
Preferred Stock of BlackRock after delivery of approximately 1.3 million shares in September 2011 pursuant to our obligation to partially fund a portion of certain BlackRock LTIP programs. Since these preferred shares are not deemed to be
in-substance common stock, we have elected to account for these preferred shares at fair value and the changes in fair value will offset the impact of marking-to-market the obligation to deliver these shares to BlackRock. Our investment in the
BlackRock Series C Preferred Stock is included on our Consolidated Balance Sheet in Other assets.
As noted above, we mark-to-market our
obligation to transfer BlackRock shares related to certain BlackRock long-term incentive plan (LTIP) programs. This obligation is classified as a derivative not designated as a hedging instrument under GAAP as disclosed in Note 12 Financial
Derivatives.
68 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
NONPERFORMING ASSETS
Nonperforming assets include:
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans and leases, |
|
|
|
Troubled debt restructurings, and |
|
|
|
Other real estate owned and foreclosed assets. |
Nonperforming loans are those loans that have deteriorated in credit quality to the extent that full collection of contractual principal and interest is not probable. When a loan is determined to be
nonperforming (and as a result is impaired), the accrual of interest is ceased and the loan is classified as nonaccrual. The current year accrued and uncollected interest is reversed out of net interest income.
A loan acquired and accounted for under ASC 310-30 Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality is reported as an accruing
loan and a performing asset due to the accretion of interest income.
We generally classify Commercial Lending (Commercial, Commercial Real
Estate, and Equipment Lease Financing) loans as nonaccrual (and therefore nonperforming) when we determine that the collection of interest or principal is not probable or when delinquency of interest or principal payments has existed for 90 days or
more and the loans are not well-secured and in the process of collection. A loan is considered well-secured when the collateral in the form of liens on (or pledges of) real or personal property, including marketable securities, has a realizable
value sufficient to discharge the debt in full, including accrued interest. Such factors that would lead to nonperforming status and subject the loan to an impairment test would include, but are not limited to, the following:
|
|
|
Deterioration in the financial position of the borrower resulting in the loan moving from accrual to cash basis, |
|
|
|
The collection of principal or interest is 90 days or more past due unless the asset is both well-secured and in the process of collection,
|
|
|
|
Reasonable doubt exists as to the certainty of the borrowers future debt service ability, whether 90 days have passed or not,
|
|
|
|
Borrower has filed or will likely file for bankruptcy, |
|
|
|
The bank advances additional funds to cover principal or interest, |
|
|
|
We are in the process of liquidation of a commercial borrower, or |
|
|
|
We are pursuing remedies under a guaranty. |
We charge off commercial nonaccrual loans when we determine that a specific loan, or portion thereof, is uncollectible. This determination is based on the specific facts and circumstances of the
individual loans. In making this determination, we consider the viability of the business or project as a going concern, the past due status when the asset is not well-secured, the expected cash flows to repay the loan, the value of the collateral,
and the ability and willingness of any guarantors to perform.
Additionally, in general, for smaller dollar commercial loans of $1 million or less, a partial or full
charge-off will occur at 120 days past due for term loans and 180 days past due for revolvers.
A consumer loan is considered well-secured
when the collateral in the form of liens on (or pledges of) real or personal property, including marketable securities, has a realizable value sufficient to discharge the debt in full, including accrued interest. Starting in the first quarter of
2012, home equity installment loans and lines of credit, whether well-secured or not, are classified as nonaccrual at 90 days past due instead of the prior policy of nonaccrual classification at 180 days past due. Well-secured residential real
estate loans are classified as nonaccrual at 180 days past due.
Home equity installment loans, lines of credit, and residential real estate
loans that are not well-secured and/or are not in the process of collection are charged-off at 180 days past due to the estimated fair value of the collateral less costs to sell.
Most consumer loans and lines of credit, not secured by residential real estate, are charged off after 120 to 180 days past due. Generally, they are not placed on nonaccrual status as permitted by
regulatory guidance.
If payment is received on a nonperforming loan, the payment is first applied to the past due principal; once this
principal obligation has been fulfilled, payments are applied to recover any partial charge-off related to the impaired loan that might exist. Finally, if both past due principal and any partial charge-off have been recovered, then the payment will
be recorded as interest income. For TDRs, payments are applied based upon their contractual terms.
A TDR is a loan whose terms have been
restructured in a manner that grants a concession to a borrower experiencing financial difficulties. TDRs may include restructuring certain terms of loans, receipts of assets from debtors in partial satisfaction of loans, or a combination thereof.
TDRs are included in nonperforming loans until returned to performing status through the fulfilling of restructured terms for a reasonable period of time (generally 6 months).
See Note 5 Asset Quality and Allowances for Loan and Lease Losses and Unfunded Loan Commitments and Letters of Credit for additional TDR information.
Nonperforming loans are generally not returned to performing status until the obligation is brought current and the borrower has performed in accordance
with the contractual terms for a reasonable period of time and collection of the contractual principal and interest is no longer in doubt.
Foreclosed assets are comprised of any asset seized or property acquired through a foreclosure proceeding or acceptance of a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure.
Other real estate owned is comprised principally of commercial real estate and
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 69
residential real estate properties obtained in partial or total satisfaction of loan obligations. Following the obtaining of a foreclosure judgment, or in some jurisdictions the initiation of
proceedings under a power of sale in the loan instruments, the property will be sold. When we acquire the deed, we transfer the loan to other real estate owned included in Other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. Property obtained in
satisfaction of a loan is recorded at estimated fair value less cost to sell. Based upon the estimated fair value less cost to sell, the recorded investment of the loan is adjusted and, typically, a charge-off/recovery is recognized to the Allowance
for Loan and Lease Losses (ALLL). We estimate fair values primarily based on appraisals, or sales agreements with third parties. Anticipated recoveries and government guarantees are also considered in evaluating the potential impairment of loans at
the date of transfer.
Subsequently, foreclosed assets are valued at the lower of the amount recorded at acquisition date or estimated fair
value less cost to sell. Valuation adjustments on these assets and gains or losses realized from disposition of such property are reflected in Other noninterest expense.
See Note 5 Asset Quality and Allowances for Loan and Lease Losses and Unfunded Loan Commitments and Letters of Credit for additional information.
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES
We maintain the ALLL at a level that we believe to be appropriate to absorb estimated probable credit losses incurred in the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date. Our determination of the allowance
is based on periodic evaluations of the loan and lease portfolios and other relevant factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates, all of which may be susceptible to significant change, including, among others:
|
|
|
Probability of default (PD), |
|
|
|
Loss given default (LGD), |
|
|
|
Exposure at date of default (EAD), |
|
|
|
Movement through delinquency stages, |
|
|
|
Amounts and timing of expected future cash flows, |
|
|
|
Value of collateral, and |
|
|
|
Qualitative factors such as changes in current economic conditions that may not be reflected in historical results. |
While our reserve methodologies strive to reflect all relevant risk factors, there continues to be uncertainty associated with, but not limited to,
potential imprecision in the estimation process due to the inherent time lag of obtaining information and normal variations between estimates and actual outcomes. We provide additional reserves that are designed to provide coverage for losses
attributable to such risks. The ALLL also includes factors which may not be directly measured in the determination of specific or pooled reserves. Such qualitative factors may include:
|
|
|
Industry concentrations and conditions, |
|
|
|
Recent credit quality trends,
|
|
|
|
Recent loss experience in particular portfolios, |
|
|
|
Recent macro economic factors, |
|
|
|
Changes in risk selection and underwriting standards, and |
|
|
|
Timing of available information. |
In determining the appropriateness of the ALLL, we make specific allocations to impaired loans and allocations to portfolios of commercial and consumer loans. While allocations are made to specific loans
and pools of loans, the total reserve is available for all credit losses.
Nonperforming loans are considered impaired under ASC
310-Receivables and are allocated a specific reserve. Specific reserve allocations are determined as follows:
|
|
|
For commercial nonperforming loans and TDRs greater than or equal to a defined dollar threshold, specific reserves are based on an analysis of the
present value of the loans expected future cash flows, the loans observable market price or the fair value of the collateral. |
|
|
|
For commercial nonperforming loans and TDRs below the defined dollar threshold, the loans are aggregated for purposes of measuring specific reserve
impairment using the applicable loans LGD percentage multiplied by the balance of the loan. |
|
|
|
Consumer nonperforming loans are collectively reserved for unless classified as TDRs, for which specific reserves are based on an analysis of the
present value of the loans expected future cash flows. |
|
|
|
For purchased impaired loans, subsequent decreases to the net present value of expected cash flows will generally result in an impairment charge to the
provision for credit losses, resulting in an increase to the ALLL. |
When applicable, this process is applied across all the
loan classes in a similar manner. However, as previously discussed, certain consumer loans and lines of credit, not secured by residential real estate, are charged off instead of being classified as nonperforming.
Our credit risk management policies, procedures and practices are designed to promote sound lending standards and prudent credit risk management. We have
policies, procedures and practices that address financial statement requirements, collateral review and appraisal requirements, advance rates based upon collateral types, appropriate levels of exposure, cross-border risk, lending to specialized
industries or borrower type, guarantor requirements, and regulatory compliance.
See Note 5 Asset Quality and Allowances for Loan and Lease
Losses and Unfunded Loan Commitments and Letters of Credit for additional information.
70 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
ALLOWANCE FOR UNFUNDED LOAN
COMMITMENTS AND LETTERS OF CREDIT
We maintain the allowance
for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit at a level we believe is appropriate to absorb estimated probable credit losses on these unfunded credit facilities as of the balance sheet date. We determine the allowance based on periodic
evaluations of the unfunded credit facilities, including an assessment of the probability of commitment usage, credit risk factors, and, solely for commercial lending, the terms and expiration dates of the unfunded credit facilities. The allowance
for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit is recorded as a liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Net adjustments to the allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit are included in the provision for credit losses.
The reserve for unfunded loan commitments is estimated in a manner similar to the methodology used for determining reserves for similar
funded exposures. However, there is one important distinction. This distinction lies in the estimation of the amount of these unfunded commitments that will become funded. This is determined using a loan equivalency factor, which is a statistical
estimate of the amount of an unfunded commitment that will fund over a given period of time. Once the future funded amount is estimated, the calculation of the allowance follows similar methodologies to those employed for balance sheet exposure.
See Note 5 Asset Quality and Allowances for Loan and Lease Losses and Unfunded Loan Commitments and Letters of Credit for additional
information.
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
Basic earnings per common share is calculated using the two-class method to determine income attributable to common shareholders. Unvested share-based
payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are considered participating securities under the two-class method. Income attributable to common shareholders is then divided by the weighted-average common
shares outstanding for the period.
Diluted earnings per common share is calculated under the more dilutive of either the treasury method or
the two-class method. For the diluted calculation, we increase the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding by the assumed conversion of outstanding convertible preferred stock and debentures from the beginning of the year or
date of issuance, if later, and the number of shares of common stock that would be issued assuming the exercise of stock options and warrants and the issuance of incentive shares using the treasury stock method. These adjustments to the
weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding are made only when such adjustments will dilute earnings per common share. See Note 13 Earnings Per Share for additional information.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2011-11 Balance Sheet (Topic 210)
Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. This ASU applies to all entities that have financial instruments and derivative instruments that are either (1) offset in accordance with either ASC 210-20-45 or ASC 815-10-45 or
(2) subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement. Under this ASU, an entity is required to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the
effect of those arrangements on its financial position. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. The disclosures required by the ASU are to be
applied retrospectively for all comparative periods presented. We will adopt the new disclosure requirements on January 1, 2013. These disclosures should not affect our results of operations or financial position.
In December 2011, the FASB also finalized ASU 2011-10 Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360) Derecognition of in Substance Real Estate
a Scope Clarification (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). This ASU clarified that the guidance in ASC 360-20 applies to a parent that ceases to have a controlling financial interest (as described in ASC 810-10) in a
subsidiary that is in substance real estate as a result of default on the subsidiarys nonrecourse debt. The amendments within this update should be applied on a prospective basis and are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within
those years, beginning on or after June 15, 2012. The adoption of this new guidance is not expected to have a material effect on our results of operations or financial position.
In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08 Intangibles Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) Testing Goodwill for Impairment. The ASU permits an entity to first assess qualitative
factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If an entity qualitatively determines the fair value of a reporting unit is greater than its carrying amount, it is not
required to perform the step 1 quantitative goodwill impairment test for the reporting unit. ASU 2011-08 is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of
this new guidance is not expected to have a material effect on our results of operations or financial position.
In June 2011, the FASB issued
ASU 2011-05 Comprehensive Income (Topic 220), Presentation of Comprehensive Income. This ASU will require an entity to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with
total other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income either in a single
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 71
continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In both presentation options, the tax effect for each component must be presented in the statement in
which other comprehensive income is presented or disclosed in the notes to the financial statements. This ASU does not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be
reclassified to net income. In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-12 Comprehensive Income (Topic 220), Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income in ASU 2011-05. This ASU defers those changes in ASU 2011-05 that relate to the presentation of reclassification adjustments as the Board redeliberates this item. Entities should continue to report reclassifications out of accumulated other
comprehensive income consistent with the presentation requirements in effect before ASU 2011-05. We adopted ASU 2011-05 and ASU 2011-12 on January 1, 2012. See the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income and Note 14, Total Equity and
Other Comprehensive Income for additional information.
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04 Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820),
Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS. This ASU provides guidance to clarify the concept of highest and best use valuation premise, how a principal market is determined, and the
application of the fair value measurement for instruments with offsetting market or counterparty credit risks. It also extends the prohibition on blockage factors to all fair value hierarchy levels. This ASU will require additional disclosures for
the following: (1) quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used in all Level 3 financial instruments, (2) the valuation processes used by the reporting entity as well as a narrative description of the sensitivity
of the fair value measurement to changes in unobservable inputs, (3) a reporting entitys use of a nonfinancial asset in a way that differs from the assets highest and best use if the fair value of the asset is reported, (4) the
categorization by level of the fair value hierarchy for items that are not measured at fair value in financial statements and (5) any transfers between Level 1 and 2 and the reason for those transfers. ASU 2011-04 is effective for the first
interim or annual period beginning after December 15, 2011, and should be applied prospectively. The adoption of this new guidance is not expected to have a
material effect on our results of operations or financial position. We adopted ASU 2011-04 on January 1, 2012. See Note 8 Fair Value for additional information.
In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-03 Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860), Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements.
This ASU removes from the assessment of effective control (1) the criterion requiring the transferor to have the ability to repurchase or redeem the financial assets on substantially the agreed terms, even in the event of default by the
transferee, and (2) the collateral maintenance implementation guidance related to that criterion. Other criteria applicable to the assessment of effective control have not been changed by this ASU. The adoption of ASU 2011-03 on January 1,
2012 did not have a material effect on our results of operations or financial position.
NOTE 2 ACQUISITION AND DIVESTITURE
ACTIVITY
RBC BANK (USA) ACQUISITION
On March 2, 2012, PNC acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding common stock of RBC Bank (USA), the US retail banking subsidiary of Royal Bank of Canada. As part of the acquisition, PNC also
purchased a credit card portfolio from RBC Bank (Georgia), National Association. PNC paid $3.6 billion in cash as consideration for the acquisition of both RBC Bank (USA) and the credit card portfolio, subject to certain post-closing adjustments
that are considered normal course of business. The transactions added approximately $18.1 billion of deposits and $14.5 billion of loans to PNCs Consolidated Balance Sheet.
RBC Bank (USA), based in Raleigh, North Carolina, operated more than 400 branches in North Carolina, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Virginia and South Carolina. The primary reasons for the acquisition of RBC
were to enhance shareholder value, to improve PNCs competitive position in the financial services industry and to further expand PNCs existing branch network in the states where it currently operates as well as expanding into new
markets.
The RBC transactions noted above were accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting and, as such, assets acquired,
liabilities assumed and consideration exchanged were recorded at their estimated fair value on the acquisition date. All acquired loans were also recorded at fair value. No allowance for loan losses was carried over and no allowance was created at
acquisition. In connection with the acquisition,
72 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed were recorded at fair value on the date of acquisition, as summarized in the following table:
RBC PURCHASE ACCOUNTING
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
|
|
Purchase price as of March 2, 2012, subject to certain post-closing adjustments |
|
$ |
3,602 |
|
|
|
Recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and (liabilities assumed), at fair value (a) |
|
|
|
|
Cash due from banks |
|
|
305 |
|
Trading assets, interest-earning deposits with banks, and other short-term investments |
|
|
1,493 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
97 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
2,349 |
|
Net loans |
|
|
14,504 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
180 |
|
Equity investments |
|
|
33 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
3,392 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
(18,094 |
) |
Other borrowed funds |
|
|
(1,321 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
(290 |
) |
Total fair value of identifiable net assets |
|
|
2,648 |
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
$ |
954 |
|
(a) |
These items are considered as non-cash activity for the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. |
In many cases the determination of estimated fair values required management to make certain estimates about discount rates, future expected cash flows, market conditions and other future events that are
highly subjective in nature. The most significant of these determinations related to the fair valuation of acquired loans. See Note 6, Purchased Loans, for further discussion of the accounting for purchased impaired and purchased non-impaired loans,
including the determination of fair value for acquired loans.
The amount of goodwill recorded reflects the increased market share and related
synergies that are expected to result from the acquisition, and represents the excess purchase price over the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired by PNC. The goodwill was assigned primarily to PNCs Retail Banking and
Corporate & Institutional Banking segments, and is not deductible for income tax purposes. Other intangible assets acquired, as of March 2, 2012 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible Assets (in millions) |
|
Fair
Value |
|
|
Weighted
Life |
|
|
Amortization
Method |
|
Residential mortgage servicing rights |
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
|
68 months |
|
|
|
(a |
) |
Core deposits |
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
144 months |
|
|
|
Accelerated |
|
Total |
|
$ |
180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Intangible asset accounted for at fair value
|
See Note 9, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, for further discussion of the accounting for goodwill and
other intangible assets.
The amount of RBCs revenue and net income (excluding integration costs) included in PNCs consolidated
income statement for the three-months ended March 31, 2012 was $98 million and $43 million, respectively.
The following table presents
certain unaudited pro forma information for illustrative purposes only, for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 as if RBC had been acquired on January 1, 2011. The unaudited estimated pro forma information combines the
historical results of RBC with the Companys consolidated historical results and includes certain adjustments reflecting the estimated impact of certain fair value adjustments for the respective periods. The pro forma information is not
indicative of what would have occurred had the acquisition taken place on January 1, 2011. In particular, no adjustments have been made to eliminate the impact of other-than-temporary impairment losses and losses recognized on the sale of
securities that may not have been necessary had the investment securities been recorded at fair value as of January 1, 2011. The unaudited pro forma information does not consider any changes to the provision for credit losses resulting from
recording loan assets at fair value. Additionally, the pro forma financial information does not include the impact of possible business model changes and does not reflect pro forma adjustments to conform accounting policies between RBC Bank (USA)
and PNC. Additionally, PNC expects to achieve further operating cost savings and other business synergies, including revenue growth, as a result of the acquisition which are not reflected in the pro forma amounts that follow. As a result, actual
results will differ from the unaudited pro forma information presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Pro Forma (RBC & PNC) For
the Three Months Ended March 31 |
|
In millions |
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
3,941 |
|
|
$ |
4,006 |
|
Net income |
|
|
798 |
|
|
|
862 |
|
In connection with the RBC acquisition and other prior acquisitions, PNC recognized $145 million of integration charges.
The integration charges are included in the table above.
On April 20, 2012, PNC signed a purchase and assumption agreement with Union
Bank, N.A. pursuant to which Union Bank will assume the deposits and acquire certain assets of the Smartstreet business unit, which was acquired by PNC as part of the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition. Smartstreet is a
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 73
nationwide business focused on homeowner or community association managers and has approximately $1 billion of assets and deposits as of March 31, 2012. The transaction is expected to close
in the fourth quarter of 2012 and is subject to certain closing conditions, including regulatory approval. Financial terms of the transaction have not been disclosed.
FLAGSTAR BRANCH ACQUISITION
Effective
December 9, 2011, PNC acquired 27 branches in the northern metropolitan Atlanta, Georgia area from Flagstar Bank, FSB, a subsidiary of Flagstar Bancorp, Inc. The fair value of the assets acquired totaled approximately $211.8 million, including
$169.3 million in cash, $24.3 million in fixed assets and $18.2 million of goodwill and intangible assets. We also assumed approximately $210.5 million of deposits associated with these branches. No deposit premium was paid and no loans were
acquired in the transaction. Our Consolidated Income Statement includes the impact of the branch activity subsequent to our December 9, 2011 acquisition.
BANKATLANTIC BRANCH ACQUISITION
Effective June 6, 2011, we acquired 19 branches from BankAtlantic in the greater Tampa, Florida area from BankAtlantic, a subsidiary of BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. The fair value of the assets
acquired totaled $324.9 million, including $256.9 million in cash, $26.0 million in fixed assets and $42.0 million of goodwill and intangible assets. We also assumed approximately $324.5 million of deposits associated with these branches. A $39.0
million deposit premium was paid and no loans were acquired in the transaction. Our Consolidated Income Statement includes the impact of the branch activity subsequent to our June 6, 2011 acquisition.
NOTE 3 LOAN SALE AND SERVICING
ACTIVITIES AND VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
LOAN SALE AND SERVICING ACTIVITIES
We have transferred residential and commercial mortgage loans in securitization or sales transactions in which we have continuing involvement. These
transfers have occurred through Agency securitization, Non-Agency securitization, and whole-loan sale transactions. Agency securitizations consist of securitization transactions with Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA), Federal Home Loan
Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC), and Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) (collectively the Agencies). FNMA and FHLMC generally securitize our transferred loans into mortgage-backed securities for sale into the secondary market through
special purpose entities (SPEs) that they sponsor. We, as an authorized GNMA issuer/servicer, pool Federal Housing Administration (FHA) and Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) insured loans into mortgage-backed securities for sale into the secondary
market. In Non-Agency securitizations, we have transferred loans into securitization SPEs. Third-party investors have also purchased our loans in whole-loan sale transactions and in certain instances have
subsequently sold these loans into securitization SPEs. Securitization SPEs utilized in the Agency and Non-Agency securitization transactions are VIEs.
Our continuing involvement in the Agency securitizations, Non-Agency securitizations, and whole-loan sale transactions generally consists of servicing,
repurchases of previously transferred loans under certain conditions and loss share arrangements, and, in limited circumstances, holding of mortgage-backed securities issued by the securitization SPEs.
Depending on the transaction, we may act as the master, primary, and/or special servicer to the securitization SPEs or third-party investors. Servicing
responsibilities typically consist of collecting and remitting monthly borrower principal and interest payments, maintaining escrow deposits, performing loss mitigation and foreclosure activities, and, in certain instances, funding of servicing
advances. Servicing advances, which are reimbursable, are recognized in Other assets at cost and are made for principal and interest and collateral protection.
We earn servicing and other ancillary fees for our role as servicer and, depending on the contractual terms of the servicing arrangement, we can be terminated as servicer with or without cause. At the
consummation date of each type of loan transfer, we recognize a servicing asset at fair value. Servicing assets are recognized in Other intangible assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheet and almost all when subsequently accounted for at fair value
are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. See Note 8 Fair Value and Note 9 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets for further discussion of our residential and commercial servicing assets.
Certain loans transferred to the Agencies contain removal of account provisions (ROAPs). Under these ROAPs, we hold an option to repurchase at par
individual delinquent loans that meet certain criteria. When we have the unilateral ability to repurchase a delinquent loan, effective control over the loan has been regained and we recognize an asset (in either Loans or Loans held for sale) and a
corresponding liability (in Other borrowed funds) on the balance sheet regardless of our intent to repurchase the loan. At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the balance of our ROAP asset and liability totaled $202 million and $265
million, respectively.
The Agency and Non-Agency mortgage-backed securities issued by the securitization SPEs that are purchased and held on
our balance sheet are typically purchased in the secondary market. PNC does not retain any credit risk on its Agency mortgage-backed security positions as FNMA, FHLMC, and the US Government (for GNMA) guarantee losses of principal and interest.
Substantially all of the non-agency mortgage-backed securities acquired and held on our balance sheet are senior tranches in the securitization structure.
We also have involvement with certain Agency and Non-Agency commercial securitization SPEs where we have
74 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
not transferred commercial mortgage loans. These SPEs were sponsored by independent third-parties and the loans held by these entities were purchased exclusively from other third-parties.
Generally, our involvement with these SPEs is as servicer with servicing activities consistent with those described above. In certain instances, we can be terminated as servicer in these commercial securitization structures without cause by the
controlling class of mortgage-backed security holders of the SPE.
We recognize a liability for our loss exposure associated with contractual
obligations to repurchase previously transferred
loans due to breaches of representations and warranties and also for loss sharing arrangements (recourse obligations) with the Agencies. Other than providing temporary liquidity under servicing
advances and our loss exposure associated with our repurchase and recourse obligations, we have not provided nor are we required to provide any type of credit support, guarantees, or commitments to the securitization SPEs or third-party investors in
these transactions. See Note 17 Commitments and Guarantees for further discussion of our repurchase and recourse obligations.
The following table provides
information related to certain financial information associated with PNCs loan sale and servicing activities:
Certain Financial
Information and Cash Flows Associated with Loan Sale and Servicing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
Residential Mortgages |
|
|
Commercial Mortgages (a) |
|
|
Home Equity Loans/ Lines (b) |
|
FINANCIAL INFORMATION March 31, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing portfolio (c) |
|
$ |
121,129 |
|
|
$ |
152,320 |
|
|
$ |
5,584 |
|
Carrying value of servicing assets (d) |
|
|
724 |
|
|
|
428 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Servicing advances (e) |
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
503 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Servicing deposits (f) |
|
|
2,466 |
|
|
|
3,522 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Repurchase and recourse obligations (g) |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Carrying value of mortgage-backed securities held (h) |
|
|
5,124 |
|
|
|
1,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCIAL INFORMATION December 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing portfolio (c) |
|
$ |
118,058 |
|
|
$ |
155,813 |
|
|
$ |
5,661 |
|
Carrying value of servicing assets (d) |
|
|
647 |
|
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Servicing advances (e) |
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Servicing deposits (f) |
|
|
2,264 |
|
|
|
3,861 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Repurchase and recourse obligations (g) |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
Carrying value of mortgage-backed securities held (h) |
|
|
4,654 |
|
|
|
1,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
Residential Mortgages |
|
|
Commercial Mortgages (a) |
|
|
Home Equity Loans/ Lines (b) |
|
CASH FLOWS Three months ended March 31, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of loans (i) |
|
$ |
3,509 |
|
|
$ |
481 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchases of previously transferred loans (j) |
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
Contractual servicing fees received |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Servicing advances recovered/(funded), net |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows on mortgage-backed securities held (h) |
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS Three months ended March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of loans (i) |
|
$ |
3,385 |
|
|
$ |
483 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchases of previously transferred loans (j) |
|
|
444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
Contractual servicing fees received |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Servicing advances recovered/(funded), net |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
Cash flows on mortgage-backed securities held (h) |
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Represents financial and cash flow information associated with both commercial mortgage loan transfer and servicing activities. |
(b) |
These activities were part of an acquired brokered home equity business in which PNC is no longer engaged. See Note 17 Commitments and Guarantees for further
information. |
(c) |
For our continuing involvement with residential mortgages and home equity loan/line transfers, amount represents outstanding balance of loans transferred and serviced.
For commercial mortgages, amount represents the portion of the overall servicing portfolio in which loans have been transferred by us or third parties to VIEs. |
(d) |
See Note 8 Fair Value and Note 9 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets for further information. |
(e) |
Pursuant to certain contractual servicing agreements, represents outstanding balance of funds advanced (i) to investors for monthly collections of borrower
principal and interest, (ii) for borrower draws on unused home equity lines of credit, and (iii) for collateral protection associated with the underlying mortgage collateral. |
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 75
(f) |
Represents balances in custodial and escrow demand deposit accounts held at PNC on behalf of investors. Borrowers loan payments including escrows are deposited in
these accounts prior to their distribution. |
(g) |
Represents liability for our loss exposure associated with loan repurchases for breaches of representations and warranties for our Residential Mortgage Banking and
Non-Strategic Assets Portfolio segments, and our commercial mortgage loss share arrangements for our Corporate & Institutional Banking segment. See Note 17 Commitments and Guarantees for further information. |
(h) |
Represents securities held where PNC transferred to and/or services loans for a securitization SPE and we hold securities issued by that SPE. |
(i) |
There were no gains or losses recognized on the transaction date for sales of residential mortgage and certain commercial mortgage loans as these loans are recognized
on the balance sheet at fair value. For transfers of commercial mortgage loans not recognized on the balance sheet at fair value, gains/losses recognized on sales of these loans were insignificant for the periods presented. |
(j) |
Includes repurchases of government insured, and government guaranteed loans, repurchased through the exercise of our ROAP option. |
VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES (VIES)
As discussed in our 2011 Form 10-K, we are involved with various entities in the normal course of business that are deemed to be VIEs. The following
provides a summary of VIEs, including those that we have consolidated and those in which we hold variable interests but have not consolidated into our financial statements as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
Consolidated VIEs Carrying Value (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2012 In millions |
|
Market Street |
|
|
Credit Card Securitization Trust |
|
|
Tax Credit Investments |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
Interest-earning deposits with banks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Investment securities |
|
$ |
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109 |
|
Loans |
|
|
5,220 |
|
|
$ |
1,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,032 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(73 |
) |
Equity investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,741 |
|
|
|
1,741 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
807 |
|
|
|
1,231 |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
5,753 |
|
|
$ |
1,739 |
|
|
$ |
2,563 |
|
|
$ |
10,055 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other borrowed funds |
|
$ |
5,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
217 |
|
|
$ |
5,546 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
807 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
5,749 |
|
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
$ |
709 |
|
|
$ |
6,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2011 In millions |
|
Market Street |
|
|
Credit Card Securitization Trust |
|
|
Tax Credit Investments |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
Interest-earning deposits with banks |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
317 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
Investment securities |
|
$ |
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109 |
|
Loans |
|
|
4,163 |
|
|
|
1,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,096 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(91 |
) |
Equity investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,643 |
|
|
|
1,643 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
838 |
|
|
|
1,205 |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,632 |
|
|
$ |
2,166 |
|
|
$ |
2,496 |
|
|
$ |
9,294 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other borrowed funds |
|
$ |
4,272 |
|
|
$ |
287 |
|
|
$ |
218 |
|
|
$ |
4,777 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
734 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
4,627 |
|
|
$ |
337 |
|
|
$ |
702 |
|
|
$ |
5,666 |
|
(a) |
Amounts represent carrying value on PNCs Consolidated Balance Sheet. |
76 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
Assets and Liabilities of Consolidated VIEs (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
Aggregate Assets |
|
|
Aggregate Liabilities |
|
March 31, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Street |
|
$ |
6,728 |
|
|
$ |
6,730 |
|
Credit Card Securitization Trust |
|
|
1,817 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
Tax Credit Investments |
|
|
2,572 |
|
|
|
730 |
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Street |
|
$ |
5,490 |
|
|
$ |
5,491 |
|
Credit Card Securitization Trust |
|
|
2,175 |
|
|
|
494 |
|
Tax Credit Investments |
|
|
2,503 |
|
|
|
723 |
|
(a) |
Amounts in this table differ from total assets and liabilities in the preceding Consolidated VIEs Carrying Value table due to the elimination of
intercompany assets and liabilities in the preceding table. |
Non-Consolidated VIEs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
Aggregate Assets |
|
|
Aggregate Liabilities |
|
|
PNC
Risk of Loss |
|
|
Carrying Value of Assets |
|
|
Carrying Value of Liabilities |
|
March 31, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Credit Investments (a) |
|
$ |
5,965 |
|
|
$ |
2,225 |
|
|
$ |
909 |
|
|
$ |
909 |
(c) |
|
$ |
370 |
(d) |
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securitizations (b) |
|
|
74,280 |
|
|
|
74,280 |
|
|
|
1,927 |
|
|
|
1,927 |
(e) |
|
|
|
|
Residential Mortgage-Backed Securitizations (b) |
|
|
46,904 |
|
|
|
46,904 |
|
|
|
5,140 |
|
|
|
5,140 |
(e) |
|
|
90 |
(d) |
Collateralized Debt Obligations |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
(c) |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
127,164 |
|
|
$ |
123,409 |
|
|
$ |
7,977 |
|
|
$ |
7,977 |
|
|
$ |
460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
Aggregate Assets |
|
|
Aggregate Liabilities |
|
|
PNC Risk of Loss |
|
|
Carrying Value of Assets |
|
|
Carrying Value of Liabilities |
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Credit Investments (a) |
|
$ |
5,382 |
|
|
$ |
2,384 |
|
|
$ |
836 |
|
|
$ |
836 |
(c) |
|
$ |
352 |
(d) |
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securitizations (b) |
|
|
75,961 |
|
|
|
75,961 |
|
|
|
2,079 |
|
|
|
2,079 |
(e) |
|
|
|
|
Residential Mortgage-Backed Securitizations (b) |
|
|
44,315 |
|
|
|
44,315 |
|
|
|
4,667 |
|
|
|
4,667 |
(e) |
|
|
99 |
(d) |
Collateralized Debt Obligations |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
(c) |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
125,671 |
|
|
$ |
122,660 |
|
|
$ |
7,583 |
|
|
$ |
7,583 |
|
|
$ |
451 |
|
(a) |
Aggregate assets and aggregate liabilities are based on limited availability of financial information associated with certain acquired partnerships.
|
(b) |
Amounts reflect involvement with securitization SPEs where PNC transferred to and/or services loans for a SPE and we hold securities issued by that SPE. Asset amounts
equal outstanding liability amounts of the SPEs due to limited availability of SPE financial information. We also invest in other mortgage and asset-backed securities issued by third-party VIEs with which we have no continuing involvement. Further
information on these securities is included in Note 7 Investment Securities and values disclosed represent our maximum exposure to loss for those securities holdings. |
(c) |
Included in Equity investments on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. |
(d) |
Included in Other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. |
(e) |
Included in Trading securities, Investment securities, Other intangible assets, and Other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. |
MARKET STREET
Market Street Funding LLC (Market Street), owned by an independent third-party, is a multi-seller asset-backed commercial paper conduit that primarily
purchases assets or makes loans secured by interests in pools of receivables from US corporations. Market Street funds the purchases of assets or loans by issuing commercial paper. Market Street is supported by pool-specific credit enhancements,
liquidity facilities, and a program-level credit enhancement. Generally, Market Street mitigates its potential interest rate risk by entering into agreements with its borrowers that reflect interest rates based upon its weighted-average commercial
paper cost of funds. During 2011 and the first three months of 2012, Market Street met all of its funding needs through the issuance of commercial paper.
PNC Bank, N.A. provides certain administrative services, the program-level credit enhancement and a
liquidity facility to Market Street in exchange for fees negotiated based on market rates. The program-level credit enhancement covers net losses in the amount of 10% of commitments, excluding explicitly rated AAA/Aaa facilities. Coverage is the
form of a cash collateral account funded by a loan facility. This facility expires in June 2016. At March 31, 2012, $974 million was outstanding on this facility.
Although the commercial paper obligations at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 were supported by Market Streets assets, PNC Bank, N.A. may be obligated to fund Market Street under the
$9.5 billion of liquidity facilities for events such as commercial paper market disruptions, borrower
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 77
bankruptcies, collateral deficiencies or covenant violations. Our credit risk under the liquidity facility is secondary to the risk of first loss absorbed by Market Street borrowers through
over-collateralization of assets and losses absorbed by deal-specific credit enhancement provided by a third party. The deal-specific credit enhancement is generally structured to cover a multiple of expected losses for the pool of assets and is
sized to meet rating agency standards for comparably structured transactions.
Through the credit enhancement and liquid facility
arrangements, PNC Bank, N.A. has the power to direct the activities of Market Street that most significantly affect its economic performance and these arrangements expose PNC Bank, N.A. to expected losses or residual returns that are potentially
significant to Market Street. Therefore, PNC Bank, N.A. consolidates Market Street. PNC Bank, N.A. is not required to nor have we provided additional financial support to Market Street and Market Street creditors have no direct recourse to PNC Bank,
N.A.
CREDIT CARD SECURITIZATION TRUST
We were the sponsor of several credit card securitizations facilitated through a trust. This bankruptcy-remote SPE or VIE was established to purchase
credit card receivables from the sponsor and to issue and sell asset-backed securities created by it to independent third-parties. The SPE was financed primarily through the sale of these asset-backed securities. These transactions were originally
structured as a form of liquidity and to afford favorable capital treatment.
Our continuing involvement in these securitization transactions
consisted primarily of holding certain retained interests and acting as the primary servicer. For each securitization series that was outstanding, our retained interests held were in the form of a pro-rata undivided interest, or sellers
interest, in the transferred receivables, subordinated tranches of asset-backed securities, interest-only strips, discount receivables, and subordinated interests in accrued interest and fees in securitized receivables. We consolidated the SPE as we
were deemed the primary beneficiary of the entity based upon our level of continuing involvement. Our role as primary servicer gave us the power to direct the activities of the SPE that most significantly affect its economic performance and our
holding of retained interests gave us the obligation to absorb or receive expected losses or residual returns that are significant to the SPE. The underlying assets of the consolidated SPE were restricted only for payment of the beneficial interest
issued by the SPE. We were not required to nor did we provide additional financial support to the SPE. Additionally, creditors of the SPE have no direct recourse to PNC.
During the first quarter of 2012, the last series issued by the SPE, Series 2007-1, matured. At March 31, 2012, the SPE remained outstanding and we consolidated the entity as we continued to be the
primary beneficiary of the SPE through
our holding of sellers interest and our role as the primary servicer.
TAX CREDIT INVESTMENTS
We make certain equity investments in various limited partnerships or limited liability companies (LLCs). The purpose of these investments is to achieve a satisfactory return on capital, and to assist us
in achieving goals associated with the Community Reinvestment Act.
Also, we are a national syndicator of affordable housing equity. In these
syndication transactions, we create funds in which our subsidiaries are the general partner or managing member and sell limited partnership or non-managing member interests to third parties. In some cases PNC may also purchase a limited partnership
or non-managing member interest in the fund and/or provide mezzanine financing to the fund. The purpose of this business is to generate income from the syndication of these funds, generate servicing fees by managing the funds, and earn tax credits
to reduce our tax liability. General partner or managing member activities include selecting, evaluating, structuring, negotiating, and closing the fund investments in operating limited partnerships or LLCs, as well as oversight of the ongoing
operations of the fund portfolio.
Typically, the general partner or managing member will be the party that has the right to make decisions
that will most significantly impact the economic performance of the entity. However, certain partnership or LLC agreements provide the limited partner or non-managing member the ability to remove the general partner or managing member without cause.
This results in the limited partner or non-managing member being the party that has the right to make decisions that will most significantly impact the economic performance of the entity. The primary sources of losses and benefits for these
investments are the tax credits, tax benefits due to passive losses on the investments, and development and operating cash flows. We have consolidated investments in which we are the general partner or managing member and have a limited partnership
interest or non-managing member interest that could potentially absorb losses or receive benefits that are significant. The assets are primarily included in Equity investments and Other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheet with the liabilities
classified in Other borrowed funds, Accrued expenses, and Other liabilities and third party investors interests included in the Equity section as Noncontrolling interests. Neither creditors nor equity investors in these investments have any
recourse to our general credit. We have not provided financial or other support to the limited partnership or LLC that we are not contractually obligated to provide. The consolidated aggregate assets and liabilities of these investments are provided
in the Consolidated VIEs table and reflected in the Other business segment.
For tax credit investments in which we do not have
the right to make decisions that will most significantly impact the
78 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
economic performance of the entity, we are not the primary beneficiary and thus they are not consolidated. These investments are disclosed in the Non-Consolidated VIEs table. The table also
reflects our maximum exposure to loss. Our maximum exposure to loss is equal to our legally binding equity commitments adjusted for recorded impairment and partnership results. We use the equity method to account for our investment in these entities
with the investments reflected in Equity investments on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. In addition, we increase our recognized investments and recognize a liability for all legally binding unfunded equity commitments. These liabilities are
reflected in Other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.
RESIDENTIAL AND
COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIZATIONS
In connection with each Agency
and Non-Agency securitization discussed above, we evaluate each SPE utilized in these transactions for consolidation. In performing these assessments, we evaluate our level of continuing involvement in these transactions as the nature of our
involvement ultimately determines whether or not we hold a variable interest and/or are the primary beneficiary of the SPE. Factors we consider in our consolidation assessment include the significance of (1) our role as servicer, (2) our
holdings of mortgage-backed securities issued by the securitization SPE, and (3) the rights of third-party variable interest holders.
Our first step in our assessment is to determine whether we hold a variable interest in the securitization SPE. We hold a variable interest in an Agency
and Non-Agency securitization SPE through our holding of mortgage-backed securities issued by the SPE and/or our repurchase and recourse obligations. Each SPE in which we hold a variable interest is evaluated to determine whether we are the primary
beneficiary of the entity. For Agency securitization transactions, our contractual role as servicer does not give us the power to direct the activities that most significantly affect the economic performance of the SPEs. Thus, we are not the primary
beneficiary of these entities. For Non-Agency securitization transactions, we would be the primary beneficiary to the extent our servicing activities give us the power to direct the activities that most significantly affect the economic performance
of the SPE and we hold a more than insignificant variable interest in the entity. At March 31, 2012, our level of continuing involvement in Non-Agency securitization SPEs did not result in PNC being deemed the primary beneficiary of any of
these entities. Details about the Agency and Non-Agency securitization SPEs where we hold a variable interest and are not the primary beneficiary are included in the table above. Our maximum exposure to loss as a result of our involvement with these
SPEs is the carrying value of the mortgage-backed securities, servicing assets, servicing advances, and our liabilities associated with our repurchase and recourse obligations. Creditors of the securitization SPEs have no recourse to PNCs
assets or general credit.
NOTE 4 LOANS AND COMMITMENTS TO
EXTEND CREDIT
Loans outstanding were as follows:
LOANS OUTSTANDING
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
March 31 2012 |
|
|
December 31 2011 |
|
Commercial lending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
75,515 |
|
|
$ |
65,694 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
18,534 |
|
|
|
16,204 |
|
Equipment lease financing |
|
|
6,594 |
|
|
|
6,416 |
|
TOTAL COMMERCIAL LENDING |
|
|
100,643 |
|
|
|
88,314 |
|
Consumer lending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
|
35,744 |
|
|
|
33,089 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
16,212 |
|
|
|
14,469 |
|
Credit card |
|
|
4,089 |
|
|
|
3,976 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
19,526 |
|
|
|
19,166 |
|
TOTAL CONSUMER LENDING |
|
|
75,571 |
|
|
|
70,700 |
|
Total loans (a) (b) |
|
$ |
176,214 |
|
|
$ |
159,014 |
|
(a) |
Net of unearned income, net deferred loan fees, unamortized discounts and premiums, and purchase discounts and premiums totaling $3.3 billion and $2.3 billion at
March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. |
(b) |
Future accretable yield related to purchased impaired loans is not included in loans outstanding. |
At March 31, 2012, we pledged $22.9 billion of commercial loans to the Federal Reserve Bank and $31.4 billion of residential real estate and other
loans to the Federal Home Loan Bank as collateral for the contingent ability to borrow, if necessary. The comparable amounts at December 31, 2011 were $21.8 billion and $27.7 billion, respectively.
Net Unfunded Credit Commitments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
March 31 2012 |
|
|
December 31 2011 |
|
Commercial and commercial real estate |
|
$ |
69,941 |
|
|
$ |
64,955 |
|
Home equity lines of credit |
|
|
20,751 |
|
|
|
18,317 |
|
Credit card |
|
|
17,610 |
|
|
|
16,216 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,152 |
|
|
|
3,783 |
|
Total (a) |
|
$ |
112,454 |
|
|
$ |
103,271 |
|
(a) |
Excludes standby letters of credit. See Note 17 Commitments and Guarantees for additional information on standby letters of credit. |
Commitments to extend credit represent arrangements to lend funds or provide liquidity subject to specified contractual conditions. At March 31,
2012, commercial commitments reported above exclude $20.9 billion of syndications, assignments and participations, primarily to financial institutions. The comparable amount at December 31, 2011 was $20.2 billion.
Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates, may require payment of a fee, and contain termination clauses in the event the customers credit
quality deteriorates. Based on our historical experience, most commitments expire unfunded, and therefore cash requirements are substantially less than the total commitment.
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 79
NOTE 5 ASSET QUALITY AND
ALLOWANCES FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES AND UNFUNDED LOAN COMMITMENTS AND
LETTERS OF CREDIT
ASSET QUALITY
We closely monitor economic conditions and loan performance trends to manage and evaluate our exposure to credit risk. Trends in delinquency rates are a key indicator, among other considerations, of
credit risk within the loan portfolios. The measurement of delinquency status is based on the contractual terms of each loan. Loans that are 30 days or more past due in terms of payment are considered delinquent. Loan delinquencies exclude loans
held for sale and purchased impaired loans, but include government insured or guaranteed loans.
The trends in nonperforming assets represent another key indicator of the potential for future credit
losses. Nonperforming assets include nonperforming loans, TDRs, and other real estate owned (OREO) and foreclosed assets, but exclude certain government insured or guaranteed loans, loans held for sale, loans accounted for under the fair value
option and purchased impaired loans. See Note 6 Purchased Loans for further information.
See Note 1 Accounting Policies for additional
delinquency, nonperforming, and charge-off information.
The following tables display the delinquency status of our loans and our
nonperforming assets at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
Age Analysis of Past Due
Accruing Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
Current or Less Than 30 Days Past Due |
|
|
30-59 Days Past Due |
|
|
60-89 Days Past Due |
|
|
90 Days Or More Past Due |
|
|
Total Past Due (a) |
|
|
Nonperforming Loans |
|
|
Purchased Impaired |
|
|
Total
Loans |
|
March 31, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
73,832 |
|
|
$ |
195 |
|
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
276 |
|
|
$ |
839 |
|
|
$ |
568 |
|
|
$ |
75,515 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
15,962 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
1,251 |
|
|
|
1,128 |
|
|
|
18,534 |
|
Equipment lease financing |
|
|
6,541 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,594 |
|
Home equity (b) |
|
|
31,946 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
2,836 |
|
|
|
35,744 |
|
Residential real estate (c) |
|
|
8,929 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
2,152 |
|
|
|
2,669 |
|
|
|
728 |
|
|
|
3,886 |
|
|
|
16,212 |
|
Credit card |
|
|
3,972 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,089 |
|
Other consumer (d) |
|
|
18,767 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
711 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
19,526 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
159,949 |
|
|
$ |
1,137 |
|
|
$ |
517 |
|
|
$ |
2,609 |
|
|
$ |
4,263 |
|
|
$ |
3,581 |
|
|
$ |
8,421 |
|
|
$ |
176,214 |
|
Percentage of total loans |
|
|
90.77 |
% |
|
|
.65 |
% |
|
|
.29 |
% |
|
|
1.48 |
% |
|
|
2.42 |
% |
|
|
2.03 |
% |
|
|
4.78 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
December 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
64,437 |
|
|
$ |
122 |
|
|
$ |
47 |
|
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
$ |
218 |
|
|
$ |
899 |
|
|
$ |
140 |
|
|
$ |
65,694 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
14,010 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
1,345 |
|
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
16,204 |
|
Equipment lease financing |
|
|
6,367 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,416 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
29,288 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
2,764 |
|
|
|
33,089 |
|
Residential real estate (c) |
|
|
7,935 |
|
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
2,281 |
|
|
|
2,759 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
3,049 |
|
|
|
14,469 |
|
Credit card |
|
|
3,857 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,976 |
|
Other consumer (d) |
|
|
18,355 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
778 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
19,166 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
144,249 |
|
|
$ |
1,018 |
|
|
$ |
547 |
|
|
$ |
2,973 |
|
|
$ |
4,538 |
|
|
$ |
3,560 |
|
|
$ |
6,667 |
|
|
$ |
159,014 |
|
Percentage of total loans |
|
|
90.72 |
% |
|
|
.64 |
% |
|
|
.34 |
% |
|
|
1.87 |
% |
|
|
2.85 |
% |
|
|
2.24 |
% |
|
|
4.19 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
(a) |
Past due loan amounts exclude purchased impaired loans as they are considered performing, even if contractually past due (or if we do not expect to receive payment in
full based on the original contractual terms), as we are currently accreting interest income over the expected life of the loans. |
(b) |
In the first quarter 2012, we adopted a policy stating that Home equity loans past due 90 days or more would be placed on nonaccrual status. Prior policy required that
these loans be past due 180 days before being placed on nonaccrual status. |
(c) |
Past due loan amounts at March 31, 2012, include government insured or guaranteed residential real estate mortgages, totaling $.1 billion for 30 to 59 days past
due, $.1 billion for 60 to 89 days past due and $2.0 billion for 90 days or more past due. Past due loan amounts at December 31, 2011, include government insured or guaranteed residential real estate mortgages, totaling $.1 billion for 30 to 59
days past due, $.1 billion for 60 to 89 days past due and $2.1 billion for 90 days or more past due. |
(d) |
Past due loan amounts at March 31, 2012, include government insured or guaranteed other consumer loans, totaling $.2 billion for 30 to 59 days past due, $.1
billion for 60 to 89 days past due and $.4 billion for 90 days or more past due. Past due loan amounts at December 31, 2011, include government insured or guaranteed other consumer loans, totaling $.2 billion for 30 to 59 days past due, $.1
billion for 60 to 89 days past due and $.3 billion for 90 days or more past due. |
80 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
Nonperforming Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars in millions |
|
March 31,
2012 |
|
|
December 31,
2011 |
|
Nonperforming loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial lending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
839 |
|
|
$ |
899 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
1,251 |
|
|
|
1,345 |
|
Equipment lease financing |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
TOTAL COMMERCIAL LENDING |
|
|
2,111 |
|
|
|
2,266 |
|
Consumer lending (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity (b) |
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
529 |
|
Residential real estate (c) |
|
|
728 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
Credit card (d) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
TOTAL CONSUMER LENDING |
|
|
1,470 |
|
|
|
1,294 |
|
Total nonperforming loans (e) |
|
|
3,581 |
|
|
|
3,560 |
|
OREO and foreclosed assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate owned (OREO) (f) |
|
|
749 |
|
|
|
561 |
|
Foreclosed and other assets |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
TOTAL OREO AND FORECLOSED ASSETS |
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
596 |
|
Total nonperforming assets |
|
$ |
4,361 |
|
|
$ |
4,156 |
|
Nonperforming loans to total loans |
|
|
2.03 |
% |
|
|
2.24 |
% |
Nonperforming assets to total loans, OREO and foreclosed assets |
|
|
2.46 |
|
|
|
2.60 |
|
Nonperforming assets to total assets |
|
|
1.47 |
|
|
|
1.53 |
|
(a) |
Excludes most consumer loans and lines of credit, not secured by residential real estate, which are charged off after 120 to 180 days past due and are not placed on
nonperforming status. |
(b) |
In the first quarter 2012, we adopted a policy stating that Home equity loans past due 90 days or more would be placed on nonaccrual status. Prior policy required that
these loans be past due 180 days before being placed on nonaccrual status. |
(c) |
Nonperforming residential real estate excludes loans of $55 million and $61 million accounted for under the fair value option as of March 31, 2012 and
December 31, 2011, respectively. |
(d) |
Effective in the second quarter 2011, the commercial nonaccrual policy was applied to certain small business credit card balances. This change resulted in loans being
placed on nonaccrual status when they become 90 days or more past due. We continue to charge off these loans at 180 days past due. |
(e) |
Nonperforming loans exclude certain government insured or guaranteed loans, loans held for sale, loans accounted for under the fair value option and purchased impaired
loans. |
(f) |
Other real estate owned excludes $252 million and $280 million at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, related to residential real estate that
was acquired by us upon foreclosure of serviced loans because they are insured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) or guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). |
Nonperforming loans also include loans whose terms have been restructured in a manner that grants a
concession to a borrower experiencing financial difficulties. In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, these loans are considered TDRs. See Note 1 Accounting Policies and the TDR section of this Note 5 for additional information. For the
three months ended March 31, 2012, $740 million of loans held for sale, loans accounted for under the fair value option, pooled purchased impaired loans, as well as certain consumer government insured or guaranteed loans which were evaluated
for TDR consideration, are not classified as TDRs. The comparable amount for the three months ended March 31, 2011 was $515 million.
Total nonperforming loans in the nonperforming assets table above include TDRs of $1.1 billion at both March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
TDRs returned to performing (accruing) status totaled $865 million and $771 million at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, and are excluded from nonperforming loans. These loans have demonstrated a period of at least six
months of consecutive performance under the restructured terms. At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, remaining commitments to lend additional funds to debtors in a commercial or consumer TDR were immaterial.
Additional Asset Quality Indicators
We have two overall portfolio segments Commercial Lending and Consumer Lending. Each of these two segments is comprised of one or more loan classes. Classes are characterized by similarities in
initial measurement, risk attributes and the manner in which we monitor and assess credit risk. The commercial segment is comprised of the commercial, commercial real estate, equipment lease financing, and commercial purchased impaired loan classes.
The consumer segment is comprised of the home equity, residential real estate, credit card, other consumer, and consumer purchased impaired loan classes. Asset quality indicators for each of these loan classes are discussed in more detail below.
Commercial Loan Class
For commercial loans, we monitor the performance of the borrower in a disciplined and regular manner based upon the level of credit risk inherent in the
loan. To evaluate the level of credit risk, we assign an internal risk rating reflecting the borrowers PD and LGD. This two-dimensional credit risk rating methodology provides risk granularity in the monitoring process on an ongoing basis. At
least annually, we update PDs based upon market data. Additionally, when statistically significant historical data exists, we update our LGDs. The
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 81
combination of the PD and LGD ratings assigned to a commercial loan, capturing both the combination of expectations of default and loss severity in event of default, reflects the relative
estimated likelihood of loss for that loan at the reporting date. Loans with better PD and LGD have the lowest likelihood of loss. Conversely, loans with worse PD and LGD have the highest likelihood of loss. The loss amount also considers EAD, which
we update when statistically significant historical data exists.
Based upon the amount of the lending arrangement and our risk rating
assessment, we follow a formal schedule of written periodic review. On a quarterly basis, we conduct formal reviews of a markets or business units entire loan portfolio, focusing on those loans which we perceive to be of higher risk,
based upon PDs and LGDs, or weakening credit quality. If circumstances warrant, it is our practice to review any customer obligation and its level of credit risk more frequently. We attempt to proactively manage our loans by using various procedures
that are customized to the risk of a given loan, including ongoing outreach, contact, and assessment of obligor financial conditions, collateral inspection and appraisal.
Commercial Real Estate Loan Class
We manage credit risk associated with our
commercial real estate projects and commercial mortgage activities similar to commercial loans by analyzing PD and LGD. However, due to the nature of the collateral, for commercial real estate projects and commercial mortgages, the LGDs tend to be
significantly lower than those seen in the commercial class. Additionally, risks connected with commercial real estate projects and commercial mortgage activities tend to be correlated to the loan structure and collateral location, project progress
and business environment. As a result, these attributes are also monitored and utilized in assessing credit risk.
As with the commercial class, a formal schedule of periodic review is performed to also assess
market/geographic risk and business unit/industry risk. Often as a result of these overviews, more in-depth reviews and increased scrutiny is placed on areas of higher risk, including adverse changes in risk ratings, deteriorating operating trends,
and/or areas that concern management. The goal of these reviews is to assess risk and take actions to mitigate our exposure to such risks.
Equipment Lease Financing Loan Class
We manage credit risk associated with our equipment lease financing class similar to commercial loans by analyzing PD and LGD.
Based upon the dollar amount of the lease and of the level of credit risk, we follow a formal schedule of periodic review. Generally, this occurs on a quarterly basis, although we have established
practices to review such credit risk more frequently, if circumstances warrant. Our review process entails analysis of the following factors: equipment value/residual value, exposure levels, jurisdiction risk, industry risk, guarantor requirements,
and regulatory compliance.
Commercial Purchased Impaired Loans Class
The credit impacts of purchased impaired loans are primarily determined through the estimation of expected cash flows. Commercial cash flow estimates are influenced by a number of credit related items,
which include but are not limited to: estimated collateral value, receipt of additional collateral, secondary trading prices, circumstances of possible and/or ongoing liquidation, capital availability, business operations and payment patterns.
We attempt to proactively manage these factors by using various procedures that are customized to the risk of a given loan. These procedures
include a review by our Special Asset Committee (SAC), ongoing outreach, contact, and assessment of obligor financial conditions, collateral inspection and appraisal.
See Note 6 Purchased Loans for additional information.
Commercial Lending Asset Quality Indicators (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Criticized Commercial Loans |
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
Pass Rated (b) |
|
|
Special Mention (c) |
|
|
Substandard (d) |
|
|
Doubtful (e) |
|
|
Total Loans |
|
March 31, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
69,268 |
|
|
$ |
2,254 |
|
|
$ |
3,208 |
|
|
$ |
217 |
|
|
$ |
74,947 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
13,022 |
|
|
|
1,124 |
|
|
|
2,876 |
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
17,406 |
|
Equipment lease financing |
|
|
6,410 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
6,594 |
|
Purchased impaired loans |
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
755 |
|
|
|
753 |
|
|
|
1,696 |
|
Total commercial lending (f) |
|
$ |
88,847 |
|
|
$ |
3,456 |
|
|
$ |
6,981 |
|
|
$ |
1,359 |
|
|
$ |
100,643 |
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
60,649 |
|
|
$ |
1,831 |
|
|
$ |
2,817 |
|
|
$ |
257 |
|
|
$ |
65,554 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
11,478 |
|
|
|
791 |
|
|
|
2,823 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
15,492 |
|
Equipment lease financing |
|
|
6,210 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
6,416 |
|
Purchased impaired loans |
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
542 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
852 |
|
Total commercial lending (f) |
|
$ |
78,444 |
|
|
$ |
2,705 |
|
|
$ |
6,335 |
|
|
$ |
830 |
|
|
$ |
88,314 |
|
(a) |
Based upon PDs and LGDs. |
(b) |
Pass Rated loans include loans not classified as Special Mention, Substandard, or Doubtful. |
82 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
(c) |
Special Mention rated loans have a potential weakness that deserves managements close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in
deterioration of repayment prospects at some future date. These loans do not expose us to sufficient risk to warrant a more adverse classification at this time. |
(d) |
Substandard rated loans have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the collection or liquidation of debt. They are characterized by the distinct
possibility that we will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. |
(e) |
Doubtful rated loans possess all the inherent weaknesses of a Substandard loan with the additional characteristics that the weakness makes collection or liquidation in
full improbable due to existing facts, conditions, and values. |
(f) |
Loans are included above based on their contractual terms as Pass, Special Mention, Substandard or Doubtful.
|
Home Equity and Residential Real Estate Loan Classes
We use several credit quality indicators, including delinquency information, nonperforming loan information, updated credit scores, originated and updated
LTV ratios, and geography, to monitor and manage credit risk within the home equity and residential real estate loan classes. We evaluate mortgage loan performance by source originators and loan servicers. A summary of asset quality indicators
follows:
Delinquency/Delinquency Rates: We monitor trending of delinquency/delinquency rates for home equity and residential real
estate loans. See the Asset Quality section of this Note 5 for additional information.
Nonperforming Loans: We monitor trending of
nonperforming loans for home equity and residential real estate loans. See the Asset Quality section of this Note 5 for additional information.
Credit Scores: We use a national third-party provider to update FICO credit scores for home equity loans and lines of credit and residential real
estate loans on at least a quarterly basis. The updated scores are incorporated into a series of credit management reports, which are utilized to monitor the risk in the loan classes.
LTV (inclusive of combined loan-to-value (CLTV) ratios for second lien positions): At least annually, we update the property values of real estate collateral and calculate an updated LTV ratio. For
open-end credit lines secured by real estate in regions experiencing significant declines in property values, more frequent valuations may occur. We examine LTV migration and stratify LTV into categories to monitor the risk in the loan classes.
Historically, we used, and we continue to use, a combination of original LTV and updated LTV for internal risk management reporting and risk
management purposes (e.g., line management, loss mitigation strategies). In addition to the fact that estimated property values by their nature are
estimates, given certain data limitations it is important to note that updated LTVs may be based upon managements assumptions (e.g., if an updated LTV is not provided by the third-party
service provider, home price index (HPI) changes will be incorporated in arriving at managements estimate of updated LTV).
Geography: Geographic concentrations are monitored to evaluate and manage exposures. Loan purchase programs are sensitive to, and focused within,
certain regions to manage geographic exposures and associated risks.
A combination of updated FICO scores, originated and updated LTV ratios
and geographic location assigned to home equity loans and lines of credit and residential real estate loans are used to monitor the risk in the loan classes. Loans with higher FICO scores and lower LTVs tend to have a lower level of risk.
Conversely, loans with lower FICO scores, higher LTVs, and in certain geographic locations tend to have a higher level of risk.
In the table
below, we provide information on home equity and residential real estate outstanding balances and recorded investment. See Note 4 Loans and Commitments to Extend Credit for additional information.
Home Equity and Residential Real Estate Balances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
March 31 2012 |
|
|
December 31 2011 |
|
Home equity and residential real estate loans excluding purchased impaired loans (a) |
|
$ |
45,275 |
|
|
$ |
41,014 |
|
Home equity and residential real estate loans purchased impaired loans (a) |
|
|
7,676 |
|
|
|
6,533 |
|
Government insured or guaranteed residential real estate mortgages (a) |
|
|
2,656 |
|
|
|
2,884 |
|
Purchase accounting, deferred fees and other accounting adjustments |
|
|
(3,651 |
) |
|
|
(2,873 |
) |
Total home equity and residential real estate loans (b) |
|
$ |
51,956 |
|
|
$ |
47,558 |
|
(a) |
Represents outstanding balance. |
(b) |
Represents recorded investment.
|
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 83
Consumer Real Estate Secured Asset Quality Indicators Excluding Purchased Impaired Loans
(a) (b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home Equity |
|
|
Residential Real Estate |
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2012 in millions |
|
1st Liens |
|
|
2nd Liens |
|
|
1st Liens |
|
|
Total |
|
Current estimated LTV ratios (c) (d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than or equal to 125% and updated FICO scores: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than 660 |
|
$ |
709 |
|
|
$ |
3,007 |
|
|
$ |
1,091 |
|
|
$ |
4,807 |
|
Less than or equal to 660 (e) (f) |
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
1,322 |
|
Missing FICO |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
Greater than or equal to 100% to less than 125% and updated FICO scores: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than 660 |
|
|
924 |
|
|
|
2,920 |
|
|
|
1,052 |
|
|
|
4,896 |
|
Less than or equal to 660 (e) (f) |
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
1,061 |
|
Missing FICO |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
Greater than or equal to 90% to less than 100% and updated FICO scores: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than 660 |
|
|
813 |
|
|
|
1,609 |
|
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
3,322 |
|
Less than or equal to 660 |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
567 |
|
Missing FICO |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
Less than 90% and updated FICO scores: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than 660 |
|
|
9,092 |
|
|
|
9,436 |
|
|
|
5,050 |
|
|
|
23,578 |
|
Less than or equal to 660 |
|
|
1,317 |
|
|
|
1,356 |
|
|
|
956 |
|
|
|
3,629 |
|
Missing FICO |
|
|
704 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
Missing LTV and updated FICO scores: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than 660 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Less than or equal to 660 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Missing FICO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
678 |
|
|
|
678 |
|
Total home equity and residential real estate loans |
|
$ |
14,041 |
|
|
$ |
20,030 |
|
|
$ |
11,204 |
|
|
$ |
45,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home Equity |
|
|
Residential Real Estate |
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2011 in millions |
|
1st Liens |
|
|
2nd Liens |
|
|
1st Liens |
|
|
Total |
|
Current estimated LTV ratios (c) (d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than or equal to 125% and updated FICO scores: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than 660 |
|
$ |
1,448 |
|
|
$ |
3,488 |
|
|
$ |
1,845 |
|
|
$ |
6,781 |
|
Less than or equal to 660 (e) (f) |
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
713 |
|
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
1,389 |
|
Missing FICO |
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
918 |
|
Greater than or equal to 100% to less than 125% and updated FICO scores: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than 660 |
|
|
1,017 |
|
|
|
2,864 |
|
|
|
1,336 |
|
|
|
5,217 |
|
Less than or equal to 660 (e) (f) |
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
1,038 |
|
Missing FICO |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
Greater than or equal to 90% to less than 100% and updated FICO scores: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than 660 |
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
1,350 |
|
|
|
760 |
|
|
|
2,797 |
|
Less than or equal to 660 |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
516 |
|
Missing FICO |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Less than 90% and updated FICO scores: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than 660 |
|
|
7,190 |
|
|
|
7,888 |
|
|
|
3,152 |
|
|
|
18,230 |
|
Less than or equal to 660 |
|
|
1,080 |
|
|
|
1,102 |
|
|
|
799 |
|
|
|
2,981 |
|
Missing FICO |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
Missing LTV and updated FICO scores: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than 660 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
Less than or equal to 660 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
Missing FICO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
731 |
|
|
|
731 |
|
Total home equity and residential real estate loans |
|
$ |
12,626 |
|
|
$ |
18,367 |
|
|
$ |
10,021 |
|
|
$ |
41,014 |
|
(a) |
Excludes purchased impaired loans of approximately $7.7 billion and $6.5 billion in outstanding balances, certain government insured or guaranteed residential real
estate mortgages of approximately $2.7 billion and $2.9 billion, and loans held for sale at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. See the Consumer Real Estate Secured Asset Quality Indicators Purchased Impaired Loans
table below for additional information on purchased impaired loans. |
(b) |
Amounts shown represent outstanding balance. |
(c) |
Based upon updated LTV (inclusive of CLTV for second lien positions). |
(d) |
Updated LTV (inclusive of CLTV for second lien positions) are estimated using modeled property values. These ratios are updated at least annually. The
related estimates and inputs are based upon an approach that uses a combination of third-party automated valuation models (AVMs), HPI indices, property location, internal and external balance information, origination data and management assumptions.
In cases where we are in an originated second lien position, we generally utilize origination balances provided by a third-party which |
84 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
|
do not include an amortization assumption when calculating updated LTV. Accordingly, the results of these calculations do not represent actual appraised loan level collateral or updated LTV based
upon a current first lien balance, and as such, are necessarily imprecise and subject to change as we enhance our methodology. |
(e) |
Higher risk loans are defined as loans with both an updated FICO score of less than or equal to 660 and an updated LTV greater than or equal to 100%.
|
(f) |
The following states have the highest percentage of higher risk loans at March 31, 2012: New Jersey 12%, Illinois 10%, Florida 10%, California 10%, Pennsylvania
9%, Ohio 9%, Maryland 6%, and Michigan 5%. The remainder of the states have lower than 5% of the high risk loans individually, and collectively they represent approximately 29% of the higher risk loans. At December 31, 2011, the states with the
highest percentage of higher risk loans were as follows: Pennsylvania 13%, New Jersey 13%, Illinois 10%, Ohio 9%, Florida 8%, California 8%, Maryland 5%, and Michigan 5%. The remainder of the states had lower than 3% of the high risk loans
individually, and collectively they represented approximately 29% of the higher risk loans. |
Consumer Real Estate Secured
Asset Quality Indicators Purchased Impaired Loans (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home Equity (b) |
|
|
Residential Real Estate (b) |
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2012 in millions |
|
1st Liens (c) |
|
|
2nd Liens (c) |
|
|
1st Liens (c) |
|
|
Total |
|
Current estimated LTV ratios (d) (e) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than or equal to 125% and updated FICO scores: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than 660 |
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
868 |
|
|
$ |
664 |
|
|
$ |
1,553 |
|
Less than or equal to 660 |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
474 |
|
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
1,251 |
|
Missing FICO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than or equal to 100% to less than 125% and updated FICO scores: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than 660 |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
576 |
|
|
|
1,116 |
|
Less than or equal to 660 |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
772 |
|
Missing FICO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than or equal to 90% to less than 100% and updated FICO scores: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than 660 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
Less than or equal to 660 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
Missing FICO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 90% and updated FICO scores: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than 660 |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
807 |
|
Less than or equal to 660 |
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
843 |
|
|
|
1,341 |
|
Missing FICO |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Missing LTV and updated FICO scores: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than 660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Less than or equal to 660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Total home equity and residential real estate loans |
|
$ |
334 |
|
|
$ |
3,125 |
|
|
$ |
4,217 |
|
|
$ |
7,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home Equity (b) |
|
|
Residential Real Estate (b) |
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2011 in millions |
|
1st Liens (c) |
|
|
2nd Liens (c) |
|
|
1st Liens (c) |
|
|
Total |
|
Current estimated LTV ratios (d) (e) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than or equal to 125% and updated FICO scores: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than 660 |
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
871 |
|
|
$ |
361 |
|
|
$ |
1,253 |
|
Less than or equal to 660 |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
532 |
|
|
|
681 |
|
|
|
1,241 |
|
Missing FICO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than or equal to 100% to less than 125% and updated FICO scores: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than 660 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
738 |
|
Less than or equal to 660 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
669 |
|
Missing FICO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than or equal to 90% to less than 100% and updated FICO scores: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than 660 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
Less than or equal to 660 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
Missing FICO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 90% and updated FICO scores: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than 660 |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
854 |
|
Less than or equal to 660 |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
1,103 |
|
Missing FICO |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Missing LTV and updated FICO scores: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than 660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Less than or equal to 660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Missing FICO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Total home equity and residential real estate loans |
|
$ |
268 |
|
|
$ |
3,137 |
|
|
$ |
3,128 |
|
|
$ |
6,533 |
|
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 85
(a) |
Amounts shown represent outstanding balance. See Note 6 Purchased Loans for additional information. |
(b) |
For the estimate of cash flows utilized in our purchased impaired loan accounting, other assumptions and estimates are made, including amortization of first lien
balances, pre-payment rates, etc., which are not reflected in this table. |
(c) |
The following states have the highest percentage of loans at March 31, 2012: California 21%, Florida 21%, Illinois 8%, Ohio 6%, North Carolina 5%, and Michigan 4%.
The remainder of the states have lower than a 4% concentration of purchased impaired loans individually, and collectively they represent approximately 35% of the purchased impaired portfolio. At December 31, 2011, the states with the highest
percentage of loans were as follows: California 22%, Florida 13%, Illinois 12%, Ohio 9%, Michigan 5% and New York 4%. The remainder of the states have lower than a 4% concentration of purchased impaired loans individually, and collectively they
represent approximately 35% of the purchased impaired portfolio. |
(d) |
Based upon updated LTV (inclusive of CLTV for second lien positions). |
(e) |
Updated LTV (inclusive of CLTV for second lien positions) are estimated using modeled property values. These ratios are updated at least annually. The related estimates
and inputs are based upon an approach that uses a combination of third-party AVMs, HPI indices, property location, internal and external balance information, origination data and management assumptions. In cases where we are in an originated second
lien position, we generally utilize origination balances provided by a third-party which do not include an amortization assumption when calculating updated LTV. Accordingly, the results of these calculations do not represent actual appraised loan
level collateral or updated LTV based upon a current first lien balance, and as such, are necessarily imprecise and subject to change as we enhance our methodology. |
Credit Card and Other Consumer Loan Classes
We monitor a variety of asset quality information in the management of the credit card and other consumer loan classes. Other consumer loan classes
include education, automobile, and other secured and unsecured lines and loans. Along with the trending of delinquencies and losses for each class, FICO credit score updates are generally obtained on a monthly basis, as well as a variety of credit
bureau attributes. Loans with high FICO scores tend to have a lower likelihood of loss. Conversely, loans with low FICO scores tend to have a higher likelihood of loss.
Consumer Purchased Impaired Loans Class
Estimates of the expected cash flows primarily determine the credit impacts of consumer purchased impaired loans. Consumer cash flow estimates are
influenced by a number of credit related items, which include, but are not limited to: estimated real estate values, payment patterns, updated FICO scores, the current economic environment, updated LTV ratios and the date of origination. These key
factors are monitored to help ensure that concentrations of risk are mitigated and cash flows are maximized.
See Note 6 Purchased Loans for
additional information.
Credit Card and Other Consumer
Loan Classes Asset Quality Indicators
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Card (a) |
|
|
Other Consumer (b) |
|
Dollars in millions |
|
Amount |
|
|
% of Total Loans Using FICO Credit Metric |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% of Total Loans Using FICO Credit Metric |
|
March 31, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FICO score greater than 719 |
|
$ |
2,043 |
|
|
|
50 |
% |
|
$ |
5,941 |
|
|
|
60 |
% |
650 to 719 |
|
|
1,147 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
2,393 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
620 to 649 |
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Less than 620 |
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
No FICO score available or required (c) |
|
|
421 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Total loans using FICO credit metric |
|
|
4,089 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
9,904 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
Consumer loans using other internal credit metrics (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total loan balance |
|
$ |
4,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
19,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average updated FICO score (d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
738 |
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FICO score greater than 719 |
|
$ |
2,016 |
|
|
|
51 |
% |
|
$ |
5,556 |
|
|
|
61 |
% |
650 to 719 |
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
2,125 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
620 to 649 |
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Less than 620 |
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
548 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
No FICO score available or required (c) |
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Total loans using FICO credit metric |
|
|
3,976 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
9,173 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
Consumer loans using other internal credit metrics (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total loan balance |
|
$ |
3,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
19,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average updated FICO score (d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
739 |
|
86 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
(a) |
At March 31, 2012, we had $47 million of credit card loans that are higher risk (i.e., loans with both updated FICO scores less than 660 and in late stage (90+
days) delinquency status). The majority of the March 31, 2012 balance related to higher risk credit card loans is geographically distributed throughout the following areas: Ohio 19%, Michigan 14%, Pennsylvania 13%, Illinois 8%, Indiana 7%,
Florida 5%, Kentucky 4%, and New Jersey 4%. All other states, none of which comprise more than 3%, make up the remainder of the balance. At December 31, 2011, we had $49 million of credit card loans that are higher risk. The majority of the
December 31, 2011 balance related to higher risk credit card loans is geographically distributed throughout the following areas: Ohio 20%, Michigan 14%, Pennsylvania 13%, Illinois 7%, Indiana 7%, Florida 6%, and Kentucky 5%. All other states,
none of which comprise more than 4%, make up the remainder of the balance. |
(b) |
Other consumer loans for which updated FICO scores are used as an asset quality indicator include non-government guaranteed or insured education loans, automobile loans
and other secured and unsecured lines and loans. Other consumer loans for which other internal credit metrics are used as an asset quality indicator include primarily government guaranteed or insured education loans, as well as consumer loans to
high net worth individuals. Other internal credit metrics may include delinquency status, geography or other factors. |
(c) |
Credit card loans and other consumer loans with no FICO score available or required refers to new accounts issued to borrowers with limited credit history, accounts for
which we cannot obtain an updated FICO (e.g., recent profile changes), cards issued with a business name, and/or cards secured by collateral. Management proactively assesses the risk and size of this loan portfolio and, when necessary, takes actions
to mitigate the credit risk. |
(d) |
Weighted-average updated FICO score excludes accounts with no FICO score available or required. |
TROUBLED DEBT RESTRUCTURINGS (TDRS)
A TDR is a loan whose terms have been restructured in a manner that grants a concession to a borrower experiencing financial
difficulties. TDRs typically result from our loss mitigation activities and include rate reductions, principal forgiveness, postponement/reduction of scheduled amortization, and extensions, which are intended to minimize economic loss and to avoid
foreclosure or repossession of collateral. In those situations where principal is forgiven, the amount of such principal forgiveness is immediately charged off.
Some TDRs may not ultimately result in the full collection of principal and interest, as restructured, and result in potential incremental losses. These potential incremental losses have been factored
into our overall ALLL estimate. The level of any subsequent defaults will likely be affected by future economic conditions. Once a loan becomes a TDR, it will continue to be reported as a TDR until it is ultimately repaid in full, the collateral is
foreclosed upon, or it is fully charged off. We held specific reserves in the ALLL of $571 million and $580 million at March 31, 2012, and December 31, 2011, respectively, for the total TDR portfolio.
Summary of Troubled Debt Restructurings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
Mar. 31 2012 |
|
|
Dec. 31 2011 |
|
Total consumer lending |
|
$ |
1,821 |
|
|
$ |
1,798 |
|
Total commercial lending |
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
Total TDRs |
|
$ |
2,233 |
|
|
$ |
2,203 |
|
Nonperforming |
|
$ |
1,095 |
|
|
$ |
1,141 |
|
Accruing (a) |
|
|
865 |
|
|
|
771 |
|
Credit card (b) |
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
Total TDRs |
|
$ |
2,233 |
|
|
$ |
2,203 |
|
(a) |
Accruing loans have demonstrated a period of at least six months of performance under the restructured terms and are excluded from nonperforming loans.
|
(b) |
Includes credit cards and certain small business and consumer credit agreements whose terms have been restructured and are TDRs. However, since our policy is to exempt
these loans from being placed on nonaccrual status as permitted by regulatory guidance as generally these loans are directly charged off in the period that they become 180 days past due, these loans are excluded from nonperforming loans.
|
The table below quantifies the number of loans that were classified as TDRs during the three months ended
March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011. The change in the recorded investments as a result of the TDR is also provided below.
FINANCIAL IMPACT OF TDRS (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2012
Dollars in millions |
|
Number of Loans |
|
|
Pre-TDR Recorded Investment (b) |
|
|
Post-TDR Recorded Investment (c) |
|
Commercial lending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
104 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
Equipment lease financing |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
TOTAL COMMERCIAL LENDING |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
Consumer lending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
|
1,103 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
Credit card |
|
|
2,501 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
TOTAL CONSUMER LENDING |
|
|
4,138 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
Total TDRs |
|
|
4,268 |
|
|
$ |
249 |
|
|
$ |
228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2011 (d)
Dollars in millions |
|
Number of Loans |
|
|
Pre-TDR Recorded Investment (b) |
|
|
Post-TDR Recorded Investment (c) |
|
Commercial lending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
150 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
Total commercial lending (e) |
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
Consumer lending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
|
1,070 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
Credit card |
|
|
4,117 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Total consumer lending |
|
|
5,582 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
Total TDRs |
|
|
5,752 |
|
|
$ |
298 |
|
|
$ |
282 |
|
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 87
(a) |
Impact of partial charge offs at TDR date are included in this table. |
(b) |
Represents the recorded investment of the loans as of the quarter end prior to the TDR designation, and excludes immaterial amounts of accrued interest receivable.
|
(c) |
Represents the recorded investment of the TDRs as of the quarter end the TDR occurs, and excludes immaterial amounts of accrued interest receivable.
|
(d) |
Includes loans modified during the three months ended March 31, 2011 that were determined to be TDRs under the requirements of ASU 2011-02, which was adopted on
July 1, 2011 and prospectively applied to all modifications entered into on and after January 1, 2011. |
(e) |
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, there were no loans classified as TDRs in the Equipment lease financing loan class. |
TDRs may result in charge-offs and interest income not being recognized. At or around the time of modification, there was $1 million in recorded
investment of commercial TDRs, $2 million in recorded investment of commercial real estate TDRs, and $5 million in recorded investment of equipment lease financing TDRs charged off during the three months ended March 31, 2012. Comparable
amounts for the three months ended March 31, 2011 were $2 million, $2 million, and zero respectively. For residential real estate, the amount of recorded investment that was charged off during the three months ended March 31, 2012, related
to modifications in which principal was partially deferred and deemed uncollectible, was immaterial. The comparable amount for the three months ended March 31, 2011 was $8 million. There were no charge offs around the time of modification
related to home equity, credit card, and other consumer TDR portfolios for either periods.
A financial effect of rate reduction TDRs is that interest income not recognized. Interest income not
recognized that otherwise would have been earned in the three months ended March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011 related to both commercial TDRs and consumer TDRs was not material.
The table below provides additional TDR information. The Principal Forgiveness TDR category includes principal forgiveness and accrued interest forgiveness. These types of TDRs result in a write down of
the recorded investment and a charge-off if such action has not already taken place. The Rate Reduction TDR category includes reduced interest rate and interest deferral. The TDRs within this category would result in reductions to future interest
income. The Other TDR category primarily includes postponement/reduction of scheduled amortization, as well as contractual extensions.
In
some cases, there have been multiple concessions granted on one loan. When there have been multiple concessions granted, the principal forgiveness TDR was prioritized for purposes of determining the inclusion in the table below. For example, if
there is principal forgiveness in conjunction with lower interest rate and postponement of amortization, the type of concession will be reported as Principal Forgiveness. Second in priority would be rate reduction. For example, if there is an
interest rate reduction in conjunction with postponement of amortization, the type of concession will be reported as a Rate Reduction.
TDRS BY TYPE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2012
Dollars in millions |
|
Post-TDR Recorded Investment |
|
|
Principal Forgiveness |
|
|
Rate Reduction |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Commercial lending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
Equipment lease financing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
TOTAL COMMERCIAL LENDING |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
Consumer lending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
Credit card |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
TOTAL CONSUMER LENDING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
Total TDRs |
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
123 |
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
$ |
228 |
|
88 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2011 (a)
Dollars in millions |
|
Post-TDR Recorded Investment |
|
|
Principal Forgiveness |
|
|
Rate Reduction |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Commercial lending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
TOTAL COMMERCIAL LENDING (b) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
Consumer lending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
Credit card |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
TOTAL CONSUMER LENDING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
Total TDRs |
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
231 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
282 |
|
(a) |
Includes loans modified during the three months ended March 31, 2011 that were determined to be TDRs under the requirements of ASU 2011-02, which was adopted on
July 1, 2011 and prospectively applied to all modifications entered into on and after January 1, 2011. |
(b) |
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, there were no loans classified as TDRs in the Equipment lease financing loan class. |
After a loan is determined to be a TDR, we continue to track its performance under its most recent
restructured terms. In the table below, we consider a TDR to have subsequently defaulted when it becomes 60 days past due after the most recent date the loan was restructured. The following table
presents the recorded investment of loans that were classified as TDRs during a 12-month period within 2010, 2011 and 2012 and subsequently defaulted during the three months ended March 31,
2012 and March 31, 2011.
TDRs which have Subsequently
Defaulted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2012
Dollars in millions |
|
Number of Contracts |
|
|
Recorded Investment |
|
Commercial lending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
31 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
TOTAL COMMERCIAL LENDING (a) |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Consumer lending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Credit card |
|
|
1,685 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
TOTAL CONSUMER LENDING |
|
|
2,090 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
Total TDRs |
|
|
2,129 |
|
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2011 (b)
Dollars in millions |
|
Number of Contracts |
|
|
Recorded Investment |
|
Commercial lending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
4 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
TOTAL COMMERCIAL LENDING (a) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
Consumer lending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Credit card |
|
|
2,806 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
TOTAL CONSUMER LENDING (c) |
|
|
3,102 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
Total TDRs |
|
|
3,111 |
|
|
$ |
112 |
|
(a) |
During both the three months ended March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011, there were no loans classified as TDRs in the Equipment lease financing loan class that
have subsequently defaulted. |
(b) |
Includes loans modified during the three months ended March 31, 2011 that were determined to be TDRs under the requirements of ASU 2011-02, which was adopted on
July 1, 2011 and prospectively applied to all modifications entered into on and after January 1, 2011. |
(c) |
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, there were no loans classified as TDRs in the Other consumer loan class that have subsequently defaulted.
|
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 89
The impact to the ALLL for commercial lending TDRs is the effect of moving to the specific reserve
methodology from the quantitative reserve methodology for those loans that were not already put on nonaccrual status. There is an impact to the ALLL as a result of the concession made, which generally results in the expectation of fewer future cash
flows. The decline in expected cash flows, as well as the application of a present value discount rate, when compared to the recorded investment, results in a charge-off or increased ALLL. Subsequent defaults of commercial lending TDRs do not have a
significant impact on the ALLL as these TDRs are individually evaluated under the specific reserve methodology.
For consumer lending TDRs the
ALLL is calculated using a discounted cash flow model, which leverages subsequent default, prepayment, and severity rate assumptions based upon historically observed data. Similar to the commercial lending specific reserve methodology, the reduced
expected cash flows resulting from the concessions granted impact the consumer lending ALLL. The decline in expected cash flows, as well as the application of a present value discount rate, when compared to the recorded investment, results in a
charge-off or increased ALLL.
ALLOWANCES FOR LOAN AND LEASE
LOSSES AND UNFUNDED LOAN COMMITMENTS AND LETTERS OF CREDIT
We maintain the ALLL and the Allowance for Unfunded Loan Commitments and Letters of Credit at levels that we believe to be appropriate to absorb estimated
probable credit losses incurred in the portfolios as of the balance sheet date. We use the two main portfolio segments Commercial Lending and Consumer Lending and we develop and document the ALLL under separate methodologies for each
of these segments as further discussed and presented below.
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses Components
For all loans, except purchased impaired loans, the ALLL is the sum of three components: (1) asset specific/individual impaired reserves,
(2) quantitative (formulaic or pooled) reserves, and (3) qualitative (judgmental) reserves. See Note 6 Purchased Loans for additional ALLL information. While we make allocations to specific loans and pools of loans, the total reserve is
available for all loan and lease losses. Although quantitative modeling factors as discussed below are updated as the financial strength of the borrower and overall economic conditions change, there were no significant changes to our ALLL
methodology during the first three months of 2012.
Asset Specific/Individual Component
Commercial nonperforming loans and all TDRs are considered impaired and are allocated a specific reserve. See Note 1 Accounting Policies for additional
information.
Commercial Lending Quantitative Component
The estimates of the quantitative component of ALLL for incurred losses within the commercial lending portfolio
segment are determined through statistical loss modeling utilizing PD, LGD, and EAD. Based upon loan risk ratings we assign PDs and LGDs. Each of these statistical parameters is determined based
on historical data, including market data. PD is influenced by such factors as liquidity, industry, obligor financial structure, access to capital, and cash flow. LGD is influenced by collateral type, original and/or updated LTV, and guarantees by
related parties.
Consumer Lending Quantitative Component
Quantitative estimates within the consumer lending portfolio segment are calculated using a roll-rate model based on statistical relationships, calculated from historical data that estimate the movement
of loan outstandings through the various stages of delinquency and ultimately charge-off.
Qualitative Component
While our reserve methodologies strive to reflect all relevant risk factors, there continues to be uncertainty associated with, but not limited to,
potential imprecision in the estimation process due to the inherent time lag of obtaining information and normal variations between estimates and actual outcomes. We provide additional reserves that are designed to provide coverage for losses
attributable to such risks. The ALLL also includes factors which may not be directly measured in the determination of specific or pooled reserves. Such qualitative factors include:
|
|
|
Industry concentrations and conditions, |
|
|
|
Recent credit quality trends, |
|
|
|
Recent loss experience in particular portfolios, |
|
|
|
Recent macro economic factors, |
|
|
|
Changes in risk selection and underwriting standards, and |
|
|
|
Timing of available information. |
Allowance for Purchased Impaired Loans
ALLL for purchased impaired loans is
determined in accordance with ASC 310-30 by comparing the net present value of the cash flows expected to be collected to the Recorded Investment for a given loan (or pool of loans). In cases where the net present value of expected cash flows is
lower than Recorded Investment, ALLL is established. Cash flows expected to be collected represent managements best estimate of the cash flows expected over the life of a loan (or pool of loans). For large balance commercial loans, cash flows
are separately estimated and compared to the Recorded Investment at the loan level. For smaller balance pooled loans, cash flows are estimated using cash flow models and compared at the risk pool level, which was defined at acquisition based on risk
characteristics of the loan. Our cash flow models use loan data including, but not limited to, delinquency status of the loan, updated borrower FICO credit scores, geographic information, historical loss experience, and updated LTVs, as well as best
estimates for unemployment rates, home prices and other economic factors to determine estimated cash flows.
90 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
Rollforward of Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses and Associated Loan Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
Commercial Lending |
|
|
Consumer Lending |
|
|
Total |
|
March 31, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1 |
|
$ |
1,995 |
|
|
$ |
2,352 |
|
|
$ |
4,347 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
(267 |
) |
|
|
(467 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
(237 |
) |
|
|
(333 |
) |
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
Net change in allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of
credit |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
March 31 |
|
$ |
1,937 |
|
|
$ |
2,259 |
|
|
$ |
4,196 |
|
TDRs individually evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
536 |
|
|
$ |
571 |
|
Other loans individually evaluated for impairment |
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
455 |
|
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment |
|
|
1,211 |
|
|
|
968 |
|
|
|
2,179 |
|
Purchased impaired loans |
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
755 |
|
|
|
991 |
|
March 31 |
|
$ |
1,937 |
|
|
$ |
2,259 |
|
|
$ |
4,196 |
|
LOAN PORTFOLIO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TDRs individually evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
412 |
|
|
$ |
1,821 |
|
|
$ |
2,233 |
|
Other loans individually evaluated for impairment |
|
|
1,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,736 |
|
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment |
|
|
96,799 |
|
|
|
67,025 |
|
|
|
163,824 |
|
Purchased impaired loans |
|
|
1,696 |
|
|
|
6,725 |
|
|
|
8,421 |
|
March 31 |
|
$ |
100,643 |
|
|
$ |
75,571 |
|
|
$ |
176,214 |
|
Portfolio Segment ALLL as a percentage of total ALLL |
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
54 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
Ratio of the allowance for loan and lease losses to total loans |
|
|
1.92 |
% |
|
|
2.99 |
% |
|
|
2.38 |
% |
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1 |
|
$ |
2,567 |
|
|
$ |
2,320 |
|
|
$ |
4,887 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(351 |
) |
|
|
(323 |
) |
|
|
(674 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
(248 |
) |
|
|
(285 |
) |
|
|
(533 |
) |
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
421 |
|
Net change in allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of
credit |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
March 31 |
|
$ |
2,455 |
|
|
$ |
2,304 |
|
|
$ |
4,759 |
|
TDRs individually evaluated for impairment (a) |
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
502 |
|
|
$ |
529 |
|
Other loans individually evaluated for impairment |
|
|
776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
776 |
|
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment |
|
|
1,355 |
|
|
|
1,223 |
|
|
|
2,578 |
|
Purchased impaired loans |
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
579 |
|
|
|
876 |
|
March 31 |
|
$ |
2,455 |
|
|
$ |
2,304 |
|
|
$ |
4,759 |
|
LOAN PORTFOLIO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TDRs individually evaluated for impairment (a) |
|
$ |
260 |
|
|
$ |
1,575 |
|
|
$ |
1,835 |
|
Other loans individually evaluated for impairment |
|
|
2,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,848 |
|
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment |
|
|
75,581 |
|
|
|
61,601 |
|
|
|
137,182 |
|
Purchased impaired loans |
|
|
1,261 |
|
|
|
6,261 |
|
|
|
7,522 |
|
March 31 |
|
$ |
79,950 |
|
|
$ |
69,437 |
|
|
$ |
149,387 |
|
Portfolio segment ALLL as a percentage of total ALLL |
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
Ratio of the allowance for loan and lease losses to total loans |
|
|
3.07 |
% |
|
|
3.32 |
% |
|
|
3.19 |
% |
(a) |
Includes only TDRs individually evaluated for impairment prior to the adoption of ASU 2011-02. |
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 91
Impaired Loans
Impaired loans include commercial nonperforming loans and consumer and commercial TDRs, regardless of nonperforming status. Excluded from impaired loans are nonperforming leases, loans held for sale,
smaller balance homogeneous type loans and purchased impaired loans. See Note 6 Purchased Loans for additional information. Nonperforming equipment lease financing loans of $21 million and $22 million at March 31, 2012, and December 31,
2011, respectively, are excluded from impaired loans pursuant to authoritative lease
accounting guidance. We did not recognize any interest income on impaired loans that have not returned to performing status, while they were impaired during the three months ended March 31,
2012 and March 31, 2011. The following table provides further detail on impaired loans individually evaluated for impairment and the associated ALLL. Certain commercial impaired loans do not have a related ALLL as the valuation of these
impaired loans exceeded the recorded investment.
Impaired Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
Unpaid Principal Balance |
|
|
Recorded Investment (a) |
|
|
Associated Allowance (b) |
|
|
Average Recorded Investment (a) |
|
March 31, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans with an associated allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
1,058 |
|
|
$ |
691 |
|
|
$ |
204 |
|
|
$ |
737 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
1,415 |
|
|
|
927 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
985 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
806 |
|
|
|
794 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
778 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
878 |
|
|
|
727 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
729 |
|
Credit card |
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
Total impaired loans with an associated allowance |
|
$ |
4,457 |
|
|
$ |
3,439 |
|
|
$ |
1,026 |
|
|
$ |
3,532 |
|
Impaired loans without an associated allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
373 |
|
|
$ |
167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
146 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
598 |
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353 |
|
Total impaired loans without an associated allowance |
|
$ |
971 |
|
|
$ |
530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
499 |
|
Total impaired loans |
|
$ |
5,428 |
|
|
$ |
3,969 |
|
|
$ |
1,026 |
|
|
$ |
4,031 |
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans with an associated allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
1,125 |
|
|
$ |
785 |
|
|
$ |
241 |
|
|
$ |
979 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
1,452 |
|
|
|
1,043 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
1,247 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
774 |
|
|
|
762 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
702 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
853 |
|
|
|
730 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
609 |
|
Credit card |
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
281 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Total impaired loans with an associated allowance |
|
$ |
4,510 |
|
|
$ |
3,626 |
|
|
$ |
1,100 |
|
|
$ |
3,857 |
|
Impaired loans without an associated allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
347 |
|
|
$ |
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
104 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
413 |
|
Total impaired loans without an associated allowance |
|
$ |
939 |
|
|
$ |
467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
517 |
|
Total impaired loans |
|
$ |
5,449 |
|
|
$ |
4,093 |
|
|
$ |
1,100 |
|
|
$ |
4,374 |
|
(a) |
Recorded investment in a loan includes the unpaid principal balance plus accrued interest and net accounting adjustments, less any charge-offs. Recorded investment does
not include any associated valuation allowance. Average recorded investment is for the three months ended March 31, 2012, and year ended December 31, 2011. |
(b) |
Associated allowance amounts include $571 million and $580 million for TDRs at March 31, 2012, and December 31, 2011, respectively. |
ALLOWANCE FOR UNFUNDED LOAN
COMMITMENTS AND LETTERS OF CREDIT
We maintain the allowance
for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit at a level we believe is appropriate to absorb estimated probable credit losses on these unfunded credit facilities. See Note 1 Accounting Policies for additional information.
Rollforward of Allowance for Unfunded Loan Commitments and Letters of Credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
January 1 |
|
$ |
240 |
|
|
$ |
188 |
|
Net change in allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of
credit |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
March 31 |
|
$ |
243 |
|
|
$ |
204 |
|
92 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
NOTE 6 PURCHASED LOANS
Loans acquired as part of the RBC acquisition on March 2, 2012 had an outstanding balance of $16.7 billion. At purchase, acquired
loans were recorded at fair value. No separate valuation allowance was carried over and no allowance was created at acquisition. Fair values were determined by discounting both principal and interest cash flows expected to be collected using a
market discount rate for similar instruments with adjustments that management believes a market participant would consider in determining fair value. Cash flows expected to be collected as of the acquisition date were estimated using internal models
and third party data that incorporate managements best estimate of key assumptions, such as default rates, loss severity, prepayment speeds, and timing of disposition upon default. In addition, each loan was reviewed to determine if it should
be classified as a purchased impaired loan accounted for under ASC 310-30. Loans with evidence of credit quality deterioration since origination and for which it is probable at purchase that PNC will be unable to collect all contractually required
payments were considered purchased impaired. Several factors were considered when evaluating whether a loan was considered a purchased impaired loan, including the delinquency status of the loan, updated borrower credit status, geographic
information, and updated loan-to-values (LTV). In accordance with ASC 310-30, excluded from the purchased impaired loans were leases, revolving credit arrangements and loans held for sale.
As of March 2, 2012, loans were classified as impaired or non-impaired and had a fair value of $2.0 billion and $12.5 billion and an outstanding balance of $3.0 billion and $13.7 billion,
respectively.
RBC Acquisition Purchased Loans Balances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased Impaired Loans |
|
|
Other Purchased Loans |
|
In millions |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Outstanding
Balance |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Outstanding
Balance |
|
Commercial Lending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
446 |
|
|
$ |
746 |
|
|
$ |
6,002 |
|
|
$ |
6,328 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
836 |
|
|
|
2,067 |
|
|
|
2,310 |
|
Equipment lease financing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
Total Commercial Lending |
|
|
927 |
|
|
|
1,582 |
|
|
|
8,155 |
|
|
|
8,730 |
|
Consumer Lending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
2,827 |
|
|
|
3,346 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
896 |
|
|
|
1,214 |
|
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
|
1,202 |
|
Credit card and other consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
Total Consumer Lending |
|
|
1,047 |
|
|
|
1,429 |
|
|
|
4,371 |
|
|
|
4,933 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,974 |
|
|
$ |
3,011 |
|
|
$ |
12,526 |
|
|
$ |
13,663 |
|
Purchased Impaired Loans
Purchased impaired loans are accounted for under ASC 310-30, which addresses accounting for differences between contractual cash flows and cash flows expected to be collected from the initial investment
in loans if those differences are attributable, at least in part, to credit quality. GAAP allows purchasers to aggregate purchased impaired loans acquired in the same fiscal quarter into one or more pools, provided that the loans have common risk
characteristics. A pool is then accounted for as a single asset with a single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows. Purchased impaired loans with homogeneous consumer, residential real estate and smaller balance
commercial loans with common risk characteristics are aggregated into pools where appropriate. Commercial loans with a total commitment greater than a defined threshold are accounted for individually. The excess of cash flows expected at acquisition
over the estimated fair value is referred to as the accretable yield and is recognized as interest income over the remaining life of the loan using the constant effective yield method. The difference between contractually required payments at
acquisition and the cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition is referred to as the nonaccretable difference. Subsequent changes in the expected cash flows of individual or pooled purchased impaired loans from the date of acquisition will
either impact the accretable yield or result in an impairment charge to provision for credit losses in the period in which the changes become probable. Decreases to the net present value of expected cash flows will generally result in an impairment
charge recorded as a provision for credit losses, resulting in an increase to the allowance for loan and lease losses, and a reclassification from accretable yield to nonaccretable difference. Prepayments and interest rate decreases for variable
rate notes are treated as a reduction of cash flows expected to be collected and a reduction of projections of contractual cash flows such that the nonaccretable difference is not affected.
Thus, for decreases in cash flows expected to be collected resulting from prepayments and interest rate decreases for variable rate notes, the effect will be to reduce the yield prospectively. The table
below details the contractually required payments, non-accretable difference, accretable yield, and fair value for purchased impaired loans acquired in the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition as of March 2, 2012.
Purchased Impaired Loans RBC Acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
March 2, 2012 |
|
Contractually required payments including interest |
|
$ |
3,769 |
|
Less: Nonaccretable difference |
|
|
1,211 |
|
Cash flows expected to be collected |
|
|
2,558 |
|
Less: Accretable yield |
|
|
584 |
|
Fair value of loans acquired |
|
$ |
1,974 |
|
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 93
The following table provides purchased impaired loans at March 31, 2012 and at December 31, 2011:
Purchased Impaired Loans Balances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2012 (a) |
|
|
December 31, 2011 (b) |
|
In millions |
|
Recorded Investment |
|
|
Outstanding
Balance |
|
|
Recorded Investment |
|
|
Outstanding
Balance |
|
Commercial Lending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
568 |
|
|
$ |
947 |
|
|
$ |
140 |
|
|
$ |
245 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
1,128 |
|
|
|
1,465 |
|
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
743 |
|
Total Commercial Lending |
|
|
1,696 |
|
|
|
2,412 |
|
|
|
852 |
|
|
|
988 |
|
Consumer Lending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
2,839 |
|
|
|
3,459 |
|
|
|
2,766 |
|
|
|
3,405 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
3,886 |
|
|
|
4,217 |
|
|
|
3,049 |
|
|
|
3,128 |
|
Total Consumer Lending |
|
|
6,725 |
|
|
|
7,676 |
|
|
|
5,815 |
|
|
|
6,533 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
8,421 |
|
|
$ |
10,088 |
|
|
$ |
6,667 |
|
|
$ |
7,521 |
|
(a) |
Represents National City and RBC acquisitions. |
(b) |
Represents National City acquisition. |
As of
December 31, 2011, the allowance for loan and lease losses related to purchased impaired loans was $998 million. During the first three months of 2012, $13 million of provision and $20 million of charge-offs were recorded on purchased impaired
loans. At March 31, 2012, the allowance for loan and lease losses was $991 million on $6.3 billion of purchased impaired loans while the remaining $2.1 billion of
purchased impaired loans required no allowance as net present value of expected cash flows improved or remained the same. Subsequent increases in the net present value of cash flows will result
in a recovery of any previously recorded allowance for loan and lease losses, to the extent applicable, and/or a reclassification from non-accretable difference to accretable yield, which is recognized prospectively. Disposals of loans, which may
include sales of loans or foreclosures, result in removal of the loan from the purchased impaired loan portfolio. The cash flow re-estimation process is completed quarterly to evaluate the adequacy of the allowance associated with the purchased
impaired loans.
Activity for the accretable yield for the first three months of 2012 follows:
Accretable Yield
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
2012 |
|
January 1 |
|
$ |
2,109 |
|
Accretion due to RBC acquisition on March 2, 2012 |
|
|
584 |
|
Accretion (including excess cash recoveries) |
|
|
(198 |
) |
Net reclassifications to accretable from non-accretable (a) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
Disposals |
|
|
(3 |
) |
March 31 |
|
$ |
2,469 |
|
(a) |
The net reclass includes the impact of improvements in the excess cash expected to be collected from credit improvements, as well as accretable differences related to
cash flow extensions. |
Purchased Non-Impaired Loans
Other purchased loans acquired from RBC were recorded at fair value as provided in the table below. The difference between the
acquisition date fair value and the outstanding balance represents the fair value adjustment for a loan and includes both credit and interest rate considerations. Fair values were determined by discounting both principal and interest cash flows
expected to be collected using a market discount rate for similar instruments with adjustments that management believes a market participant would consider in determining fair value. Cash flows expected to be collected as of the acquisition date
were estimated using internal models and third party data that incorporate managements best estimate of key assumptions, such as default rates, loss severity, prepayment speeds, and timing of undiscounted expected principal, interest and other
cash flows. Fair value adjustments may be discounts (or premiums) to a loans cost basis and are accreted (or amortized) to net interest income (or expense) over the loans remaining life in accordance with ASC 310-20. Fair value
adjustments for revolving loans are accreted (or amortized) using a straight line method. Term loans are accreted (or amortized) using the constant effective yield method.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 2, 2012 In millions |
|
Commercial |
|
|
Commercial Real Estate |
|
|
Equipment Lease Finance |
|
|
Home Equity |
|
|
Residential Real Estate |
|
|
Credit Card and other consumer |
|
|
Total |
|
Outstanding Balance |
|
$ |
6,328 |
|
|
$ |
2,310 |
|
|
$ |
92 |
|
|
$ |
3,346 |
|
|
$ |
1,202 |
|
|
$ |
385 |
|
|
$ |
13,663 |
|
Less: Fair value adjustment |
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
1,137 |
|
Fair value of loans acquired |
|
$ |
6,002 |
|
|
$ |
2,067 |
|
|
$ |
86 |
|
|
$ |
2,827 |
|
|
$ |
1,168 |
|
|
$ |
376 |
|
|
$ |
12,526 |
|
The table below details contractually required payments, cash flows not expected to be collected and cash flows expected
to be collected on other purchased loans acquired from RBC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 2, 2012 In millions |
|
Commercial |
|
|
Commercial Real Estate |
|
|
Equipment Lease Finance |
|
|
Home Equity |
|
|
Residential Real Estate |
|
|
Credit Card and other consumer |
|
|
Total |
|
Contractually required repayments including interest (a) |
|
$ |
6,864 |
|
|
$ |
2,466 |
|
|
$ |
101 |
|
|
$ |
5,003 |
|
|
$ |
1,869 |
|
|
$ |
414 |
|
|
$ |
16,717 |
|
Less: Contractual cash flows not expected to be collected |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1,501 |
|
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
2,451 |
|
Cash flows expected to be collected |
|
$ |
6,778 |
|
|
$ |
2,335 |
|
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
$ |
3,502 |
|
|
$ |
1,331 |
|
|
$ |
225 |
|
|
$ |
14,266 |
|
(a) |
Denotes required payments based on a loans contractual schedule assuming no loss or prepayment. |
94 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
NOTE 7 INVESTMENT SECURITIES
Investment Securities Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
In millions |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
March 31, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Treasury and government agencies |
|
$ |
2,567 |
|
|
$ |
275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,842 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency |
|
|
28,493 |
|
|
|
836 |
|
|
$ |
(31 |
) |
|
|
29,298 |
|
Non-agency |
|
|
6,791 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
(882 |
) |
|
|
6,121 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency |
|
|
865 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
899 |
|
Non-agency |
|
|
2,805 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
2,943 |
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
5,417 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
|
5,283 |
|
State and municipal |
|
|
1,899 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
1,936 |
|
Other debt |
|
|
3,647 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
3,738 |
|
Total debt securities |
|
|
52,484 |
|
|
|
1,706 |
|
|
|
(1,130 |
) |
|
|
53,060 |
|
Corporate stocks and other |
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
298 |
|
Total securities available for sale |
|
$ |
52,782 |
|
|
$ |
1,706 |
|
|
$ |
(1,130 |
) |
|
$ |
53,358 |
|
SECURITIES HELD TO MATURITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Treasury and government agencies |
|
$ |
224 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
246 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed (agency) |
|
|
4,450 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,590 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency |
|
|
1,301 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,357 |
|
Non-agency |
|
|
3,223 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
|
3,334 |
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
967 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
977 |
|
State and municipal |
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
704 |
|
Other debt |
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
373 |
|
Total securities held to maturity |
|
$ |
11,196 |
|
|
$ |
388 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
11,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Treasury and government agencies |
|
$ |
3,369 |
|
|
$ |
348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,717 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency |
|
|
26,081 |
|
|
|
772 |
|
|
$ |
(61 |
) |
|
|
26,792 |
|
Non-agency |
|
|
6,673 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
(1,268 |
) |
|
|
5,557 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency |
|
|
1,101 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,140 |
|
Non-agency |
|
|
2,693 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
2,756 |
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
3,854 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
3,669 |
|
State and municipal |
|
|
1,779 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
1,807 |
|
Other debt |
|
|
2,691 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
2,762 |
|
Total debt securities |
|
|
48,241 |
|
|
|
1,580 |
|
|
|
(1,621 |
) |
|
|
48,200 |
|
Corporate stocks and other |
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
368 |
|
Total securities available for sale |
|
$ |
48,609 |
|
|
$ |
1,580 |
|
|
$ |
(1,621 |
) |
|
$ |
48,568 |
|
SECURITIES HELD TO MATURITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Treasury and government agencies |
|
$ |
221 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
261 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed (agency) |
|
|
4,761 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
|
4,891 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency |
|
|
1,332 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,382 |
|
Non-agency |
|
|
3,467 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
3,573 |
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
1,251 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
1,262 |
|
State and municipal |
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
702 |
|
Other debt |
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
379 |
|
Total securities held to maturity |
|
$ |
12,066 |
|
|
$ |
390 |
|
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
$ |
12,450 |
|
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 95
The fair value of investment securities is impacted by interest rates, credit spreads, market volatility
and liquidity conditions. Net unrealized gains and losses in the securities available for sale portfolio are included in shareholders equity as accumulated other comprehensive income or loss, net of tax, unless credit-related. Securities held
to maturity are carried at amortized cost. At March 31, 2012, accumulated other comprehensive income included pretax gains of $90 million from derivatives used to hedge the purchase of investment securities classified as held to maturity. The
gains will be accreted into interest income as an adjustment of yield on the securities.
The gross unrealized loss on debt securities held to
maturity was $3 million at March 31, 2012 and $6 million at December 31, 2011, with $.2 billion and $.5 billion of
positions in a continuous loss position for less than 12 months at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The gross unrealized loss and fair value on debt securities held
to maturity that were in a continuous loss position for 12 months or more were not significant at both March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
The following table presents gross unrealized loss and fair value of securities available for sale at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. The securities are segregated between investments that
have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than twelve months and twelve months or more based on the point in time the fair value declined below the amortized cost basis. The table includes debt securities where a portion of
other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) has been recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss.
Gross Unrealized Loss and Fair
Value of Securities Available for Sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
Unrealized loss position less than 12 months |
|
|
Unrealized loss position 12 months or more |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Unrealized Loss |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Unrealized Loss |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Unrealized Loss |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
March 31, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency |
|
$ |
(25 |
) |
|
$ |
4,204 |
|
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
$ |
(31 |
) |
|
$ |
4,300 |
|
Non-agency |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
(847 |
) |
|
|
4,569 |
|
|
|
(882 |
) |
|
|
4,858 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-agency |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
275 |
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
1,435 |
|
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
734 |
|
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
|
2,169 |
|
State and municipal |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
821 |
|
Other debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
(80 |
) |
|
$ |
6,719 |
|
|
$ |
(1,050 |
) |
|
$ |
5,717 |
|
|
$ |
(1,130 |
) |
|
$ |
12,436 |
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Treasury and government agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency |
|
$ |
(24 |
) |
|
$ |
2,165 |
|
|
$ |
(37 |
) |
|
$ |
408 |
|
|
$ |
(61 |
) |
|
$ |
2,573 |
|
Non-agency |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
(1,242 |
) |
|
|
4,378 |
|
|
|
(1,268 |
) |
|
|
4,651 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-agency |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
483 |
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
1,355 |
|
|
|
(203 |
) |
|
|
764 |
|
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
2,119 |
|
State and municipal |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
830 |
|
Other debt |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
529 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
(91 |
) |
|
$ |
5,028 |
|
|
$ |
(1,530 |
) |
|
$ |
6,157 |
|
|
$ |
(1,621 |
) |
|
$ |
11,185 |
|
EVALUATING INVESTMENT SECURITIES FOR
OTHER-THAN-TEMPORARY IMPAIRMENTS
For the securities in the preceding
table, as of March 31, 2012 we do not intend to sell and believe we will not be required to sell the securities prior to recovery of the amortized cost basis.
On at least a quarterly basis, we conduct a comprehensive security-level assessment on all securities in an unrealized loss
position to determine if OTTI exists. An unrealized loss exists when the current fair value of an individual security is less than its amortized cost basis. An OTTI loss must be recognized for a
debt security in an unrealized loss position if we intend to sell the security or it is more likely than not we will be required to sell the security prior to recovery of its amortized cost basis. In this situation, the amount of loss recognized in
income is equal to the difference between the
96 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
fair value and the amortized cost basis of the security. Even if we do not expect to sell the security, we must evaluate the expected cash flows to be received to determine if we believe a credit
loss has occurred. In the event of a credit loss, only the amount of impairment associated with the credit loss is recognized in income. The portion of the unrealized loss relating to other factors, such as liquidity conditions in the market or
changes in market interest rates, is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss.
The security-level assessment is performed on each
security, regardless of the classification of the security as available for sale or held to maturity. Our assessment considers the security structure, recent security collateral performance metrics if applicable, external credit ratings, failure of
the issuer to make scheduled interest or principal payments, our judgment and expectations of future performance, and relevant independent industry research, analysis and forecasts. We also consider the severity of the impairment in our assessment.
Results of the periodic assessment are reviewed by a cross-functional senior management team representing Asset & Liability Management, Finance, and Market Risk Management. The senior management team considers the results of the
assessments, as well as other factors, in determining whether the impairment is other-than-temporary.
For debt securities, a critical
component of the evaluation for OTTI is the identification of credit-impaired securities, where management does not expect to receive cash flows sufficient to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security. The paragraphs below describe our
process for identifying credit impairment for our most significant categories of securities not backed by the US government or its agencies.
Non-Agency Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities and Asset-Backed Securities Collateralized by First-Lien and Second-Lien Residential Mortgage
Loans
Potential credit losses on these securities are evaluated on a security by security basis. Collateral performance assumptions
are developed for each security after reviewing collateral composition and collateral performance statistics. This includes analyzing recent delinquency roll rates, loss severities, voluntary prepayments, and various other collateral and performance
metrics. This information is then combined with general expectations on the housing market, employment, and other economic factors to develop estimates of future performance.
Security level assumptions for prepayments, loan defaults, and loss given default are applied to every security using a third-party cash flow model. The third-party cash flow model then generates
projected cash flows according to the structure of
each security. Based on the results of the cash flow analysis, we determine whether we will recover the amortized cost basis of our security.
The following table provides detail on the significant assumptions used to determine credit impairment for non-agency residential mortgage-backed and
asset-backed securities collateralized by first-lien and second-lien residential mortgage loans:
Credit Impairment Assessment
Assumptions Non-Agency Residential Mortgage-Backed and Asset-Backed Securities (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2012 |
|
Range |
|
|
Weighted- average (b) |
|
Long-term prepayment rate (annual CPR) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime |
|
|
7-20 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
Alt-A |
|
|
5-12 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Option ARM |
|
|
3-6 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Remaining collateral expected to default |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime |
|
|
1-45 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
Alt-A |
|
|
3-61 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
Option ARM |
|
|
13-83 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
Loss severity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime |
|
|
25-65 |
% |
|
|
47 |
% |
Alt-A |
|
|
30-85 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
Option ARM |
|
|
44-76 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
(a) |
Collateralized by first and second-lien non-agency residential mortgage loans. |
(b) |
Calculated by weighting the relevant assumption for each individual security by the current outstanding cost basis of the security. |
Non-Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities
Credit losses on these securities are measured using property-level cash flow projections and forward-looking property valuations. Cash flows are projected using a detailed analysis of net operating
income (NOI) by property type which, in turn, is based on the analysis of NOI performance over the past several business cycles combined with PNCs economic outlook for the current cycle. Loss severities are based on property price projections,
which are calculated using capitalization rate projections. The capitalization rate projections are based on a combination of historical capitalization rates and expected capitalization rates implied by current market activity, our outlook and
relevant independent industry research, analysis and forecasts. Securities exhibiting weaker performance within the model are subject to further analysis. This analysis is performed at the loan level, and includes assessing local market conditions,
reserves, occupancy, rent rolls and master/special servicer details.
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 97
During the first quarter of 2012 and 2011, the OTTI credit losses recognized in noninterest income related
to estimated credit losses on securities that we do not expect to sell were as follows:
Summary of OTTI Credit Losses Recognized in
Earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31
In millions |
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Available for sale securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-agency residential mortgage-backed |
|
$ |
(32 |
) |
|
$ |
(28 |
) |
Asset-backed |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Other debt |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Total |
|
$ |
(38 |
) |
|
$ |
(34 |
) |
Summary of OTTI Noncredit (Losses) Recoveries Included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31
In millions |
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
The following table presents a rollforward of the cumulative OTTI credit losses recognized in earnings for all debt
securities for which a portion of an OTTI loss was recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss:
Rollforward of Cumulative OTTI
Credit Losses Recognized in Earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
Non-agency
residential mortgage-backed |
|
|
Non-agency
commercial mortgage-backed |
|
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
Other debt |
|
|
Total |
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
(828 |
) |
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
$ |
(244 |
) |
|
$ |
(13 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,091 |
) |
Loss where impairment was not previously recognized |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Additional loss where credit impairment was previously recognized |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
Reduction due to credit impaired securities sold |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
March 31, 2012 |
|
$ |
(859 |
) |
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
$ |
(249 |
) |
|
$ |
(14 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,128 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
Non-agency residential mortgage-backed |
|
|
Non-agency commercial mortgage-backed |
|
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
Other debt |
|
|
Total |
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
(709 |
) |
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
(223 |
) |
|
$ |
(12 |
) |
|
$ |
(955 |
) |
Loss where impairment was not previously recognized |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
Additional loss where credit impairment was previously recognized |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
Reduction due to credit impaired securities sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
(737 |
) |
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
$ |
(228 |
) |
|
$ |
(13 |
) |
|
$ |
(984 |
) |
Information relating to gross realized securities gains and losses from the sales of securities is set forth in the
following table.
Gains (Losses) on Sales of Securities Available for Sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
Proceeds |
|
|
Gross Gains |
|
|
Gross Losses |
|
|
Net Gains |
|
|
Tax Expense |
|
For the three months ended March 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012 |
|
$ |
3,553 |
|
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
|
$ |
57 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
2011 |
|
|
8,178 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
The following table presents, by remaining contractual maturity, the amortized cost, fair value and weighted-average
yield of debt securities at March 31, 2012.
98 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
Contractual Maturity of Debt Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2012 Dollars in millions |
|
1 Year or Less |
|
|
After 1 Year through 5 Years |
|
|
After 5 Years through 10 Years |
|
|
After 10 Years |
|
|
Total |
|
SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Treasury and government agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
910 |
|
|
$ |
1,253 |
|
|
$ |
404 |
|
|
$ |
2,567 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
810 |
|
|
|
27,648 |
|
|
|
28,493 |
|
Non-agency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
6,766 |
|
|
|
6,791 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
865 |
|
Non-agency |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
2,560 |
|
|
|
2,805 |
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
1,206 |
|
|
|
1,204 |
|
|
|
2,939 |
|
|
|
5,417 |
|
State and municipal |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
1,531 |
|
|
|
1,899 |
|
Other debt |
|
|
655 |
|
|
|
1,933 |
|
|
|
615 |
|
|
|
444 |
|
|
|
3,647 |
|
Total debt securities available for sale |
|
$ |
762 |
|
|
$ |
5,061 |
|
|
$ |
4,369 |
|
|
$ |
42,292 |
|
|
$ |
52,484 |
|
Fair value |
|
$ |
766 |
|
|
$ |
5,236 |
|
|
$ |
4,565 |
|
|
$ |
42,493 |
|
|
$ |
53,060 |
|
Weighted-average yield, GAAP basis |
|
|
1.93 |
% |
|
|
2.42 |
% |
|
|
2.87 |
% |
|
|
3.65 |
% |
|
|
3.44 |
% |
SECURITIES HELD TO MATURITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Treasury and government agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
224 |
|
|
$ |
224 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed (agency) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,450 |
|
|
|
4,450 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
162 |
|
|
$ |
1,134 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1,301 |
|
Non-agency |
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,141 |
|
|
|
3,223 |
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
591 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
967 |
|
State and municipal |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
671 |
|
Other debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
360 |
|
Total debt securities held to maturity |
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
$ |
832 |
|
|
$ |
1,740 |
|
|
$ |
8,560 |
|
|
$ |
11,196 |
|
Fair value |
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
$ |
848 |
|
|
$ |
1,814 |
|
|
$ |
8,855 |
|
|
$ |
11,581 |
|
Weighted-average yield, GAAP basis |
|
|
2.59 |
% |
|
|
2.63 |
% |
|
|
3.34 |
% |
|
|
4.39 |
% |
|
|
4.08 |
% |
Based on current interest rates and expected prepayment speeds, the weighted-average expected maturity of mortgage and
other asset-backed debt securities were as follows as of March 31, 2012:
Weighted-Average Expected Maturity of Mortgage and Other
Asset-Backed Debt Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2012 |
|
Agency residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
3.2 years |
|
Non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
4.9 years |
|
Agency commercial mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
5.0 years |
|
Non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
2.6 years |
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
2.8 years |
|
Weighted-average yields are based on historical cost with effective yields weighted for the contractual maturity of each
security. At March 31, 2012, there were no securities of a single issuer, other than FNMA and FHLMC, that exceeded 10% of total shareholders equity.
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 99
The following table presents the fair value of securities that have been either pledged to or accepted from
others to collateralize outstanding borrowings.
Fair Value of Securities Pledged and Accepted as Collateral
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
March 31 2012 |
|
|
December 31 2011 |
|
Pledged to others |
|
$ |
23,858 |
|
|
$ |
20,109 |
|
Accepted from others: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Permitted by contract or custom to sell or repledge |
|
|
1,215 |
|
|
|
1,796 |
|
Permitted amount repledged to others |
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
892 |
|
The securities pledged to others include positions held in our portfolio of investment securities, trading securities,
and securities accepted as collateral from others that we are permitted by contract or custom to sell or repledge, and were used to secure public and trust deposits, repurchase agreements, and for other purposes. The securities accepted from others
that we are permitted by contract or custom to sell or repledge are a component of Federal funds sold and resale agreements on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.
NOTE 8 FAIR VALUE
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT
Fair value is defined in GAAP as the price that would be received to sell an asset or the price paid to transfer a liability on the measurement date. The
standard focuses on the exit price in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. GAAP establishes a fair value reporting hierarchy to maximize the use of observable
inputs when measuring fair value and defines the three levels of inputs as noted below.
Level 1
Fair value is determined using a quoted price in an active market for identical assets or liabilities. Level 1 assets and liabilities may include debt
securities, equity securities and listed derivative contracts that are traded in an active exchange market and certain US Treasury securities that are actively traded in over-the-counter markets.
Level 2
Fair value is estimated using
inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for assets or liabilities, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 assets and liabilities may include debt securities, equity securities and listed derivative contracts with
quoted prices that are traded in markets that are not active, and certain debt and equity securities and over-the-counter derivative contracts whose fair
value is determined using a pricing model without significant unobservable inputs. This category generally includes US government agency debt securities, agency residential and commercial
mortgage-backed debt securities, asset-backed debt securities, corporate debt securities, residential mortgage loans held for sale, and derivative contracts.
Level 3
Fair value is estimated using unobservable inputs that are significant to the fair
value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities may include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing services, pricing models with internally developed assumptions, discounted cash flow methodologies, or
similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation. This category generally includes certain available for sale and trading securities, commercial mortgage
loans held for sale, private equity investments, residential mortgage servicing rights, BlackRock Series C Preferred Stock and certain financial derivative contracts. The available for sale and trading securities within Level 3 include non-agency
residential mortgage-backed securities, auction rate securities, certain private-issuer asset-backed securities and corporate debt securities. Nonrecurring items, primarily certain nonaccrual and other loans held for sale, commercial mortgage
servicing rights, equity investments and other assets are also included in this category.
We characterize active markets as those where
transaction volumes are sufficient to provide objective pricing information, with reasonably narrow bid/ask spreads and where dealer quotes received do not vary widely and are based on current information. Inactive markets are typically
characterized by low transaction volumes, price quotations that vary substantially among market participants or are not based on current information, wide bid/ask spreads, a significant increase in implied liquidity risk premiums, yields, or
performance indicators for observed transactions or quoted prices compared to historical periods, a significant decline or absence of a market for new issuance, or any combination of the above factors. We also consider nonperformance risks including
credit risk as part of our valuation methodology for all assets and liabilities measured at fair value.
Any models used to determine fair
values or to validate dealer quotes based on the descriptions below are subject to review and independent testing as part of our model validation and internal control testing processes. Our Model Validation Committee reviews significant models on at
least an annual basis. In addition, we have teams, independent of the traders, verify marks and assumptions used for valuations at each period end.
100 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value, by their nature, result in a higher degree of financial
statement volatility. Assets and liabilities classified within Level 3 inherently require the use of various assumptions, estimates and judgments when measuring their fair value. As observable market activity is commonly not available to use when
estimating the fair value of Level 3 assets and liabilities, we must estimate fair value using various modeling techniques. These techniques include the use of a variety of inputs/assumptions including credit quality, liquidity, interest rates or
other relevant inputs across the entire population of our Level 3 assets and liabilities. Changes in the significant underlying factors or assumptions (either an increase or a decrease) in any of these areas underlying our estimates may result in a
significant increase/decrease in the Level 3 fair value measurement of a particular asset and/or liability from period to period.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS ACCOUNTED FOR AT FAIR
VALUE ON A RECURRING BASIS
Securities Available for
Sale and Trading Securities
Securities accounted for at fair value include both the available for sale and trading portfolios. We
primarily use prices obtained from pricing services, dealer quotes, or recent trades to determine the fair value of securities. As of March 31, 2012, 84% of the positions in these portfolios were priced by using pricing services provided by
third-party vendors. The third-party vendors use a variety of methods when pricing securities that incorporate relevant market data to arrive at an estimate of what a buyer in the marketplace would pay for a security under current market conditions.
One of the vendors prices are set with reference to market activity for highly liquid assets such as U.S. Treasury and agency securities and agency residential mortgage-backed securities, and matrix pricing for other asset classes, such as
commercial mortgage and other asset-backed securities. Another vendor primarily uses discounted cash flow pricing models considering adjustments for spreads and prepayments for the instruments we value using this service, such as non-agency
residential mortgage-backed securities, agency adjustable rate mortgage securities, agency collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs), commercial mortgage-backed securities and municipal bonds. The vendors we use provide pricing services on a global
basis and have quality management processes in place to monitor the integrity of the valuation inputs and the prices provided to users, including procedures to consider and incorporate information received from pricing service users who may
challenge a price. We monitor and validate the reliability of vendor pricing on an ongoing basis through pricing methodology reviews, by performing detailed reviews of the assumptions and inputs used by the vendor to price individual securities, and
through price validation testing. Price validation testing is performed independent of the risk-taking function and involves corroborating the prices received from third-party vendors with prices from another
third-party source, by reviewing valuations of comparable instruments, by comparison to internal valuations, or by reference to recent sales of similar securities. Securities not priced by one of
our pricing vendors may be valued using a dealer quote. Dealer quotes received are typically non-binding. Securities priced using a dealer quote are subject to corroboration either with another dealer quote, by comparison to similar securities
priced by either a third-party vendor or another dealer, or through internal valuation in order to validate that the quote is representative of the market. Security prices are also validated through actual cash settlement upon sale of a security.
A cross-functional team comprised of representatives from Asset & Liability Management, Finance, and Market Risk Management oversees
the governance of the processes and methodologies used to estimate the fair value of securities and the price validation testing that is performed. This management team reviews pricing sources and trends and the results of validation testing on a
monthly basis.
Securities are classified within the fair value hierarchy after giving consideration to the activity level in the market for
the security type and the observability of the inputs used to determine the fair value. When a quoted price in an active market exists for the identical security, this price is used to determine fair value and the security is classified within
Level 1 of the hierarchy. Level 1 securities include certain U.S. Treasury securities and exchange traded equities. When a quoted price in an active market for the identical security is not available, fair value is estimated using either an
alternative market approach, such as a recent trade or matrix pricing, or an income approach, such as a discounted cash flow pricing model. If the inputs to the valuation are based primarily on market observable information then the security is
classified within Level 2 of the hierarchy. Level 2 securities include agency debt securities, agency residential mortgage-backed securities, agency and non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities collateralized by
non-mortgage related consumer loans, municipal securities, and other debt securities. Level 2 securities are predominantly priced by third parties, either a pricing vendor or dealer.
In certain cases where there is limited activity or less transparency around the inputs to the valuation, securities are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy. Securities classified as Level 3
consist primarily of non-agency residential mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities collateralized by first- and second-lien residential mortgage loans. Fair value for these securities is primarily estimated using pricing obtained from
third-party vendors. In some cases, fair value is estimated using a dealer quote, by reference to prices of securities of a similar vintage and collateral type or by reference to recent sales of similar securities. Market activity for these security
types is limited with little price transparency. As a result, these securities are generally valued by the third-party vendor using a discounted cash flow
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 101
approach that incorporates observable market activity where available. Significant inputs to the valuation include prepayment projections and credit loss assumptions (default rate and loss
severity) and discount rates that are deemed representative of current market conditions. The discount rates used incorporate a spread over the benchmark curve that takes into consideration liquidity risk and potential credit risk not already
included in the credit loss assumptions. Significant increases (decreases) in any of those assumptions in isolation would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement. Prepayment estimates generally increase when market interest
rates decline and decrease when market interest rates rise. Credit loss estimates are driven by the ability of borrowers to pay their loans and housing market prices and are impacted by changes in overall macroeconomic conditions, typically
increasing when economic conditions worsen and decreasing when conditions improve. An increase in the estimated prepayment rate typically results in a decrease in estimated credit losses and vice versa. Discount rates typically increase when market
interest rates increase and/or credit and liquidity risks increase and decrease when market interest rates decline and/or credit and liquidity conditions improve. Price validation procedures are performed and the results reviewed on a monthly basis
for these Level 3 securities by a cross-functional Asset & Liability Management, Finance, and Market Risk Management team. Specific price validation procedures performed for these securities include comparing current prices to historical
pricing trends by collateral type and vintage, comparing prices by product type to indicative pricing grids published by market makers, and by obtaining corroborating dealer prices for a sample of securities.
Certain infrequently traded debt securities within the State and Municipal and Other Debt Available-for-sale and Trading securities categories are also
classified in Level 3. The significant unobservable inputs used to estimate the fair value of these securities include an estimate of expected credit losses and a discount for liquidity risk. These inputs are incorporated into the fair value
measurement by either increasing the spread over the benchmark curve or by applying a credit and liquidity discount to the par value of the security. Significant increases (decreases) in credit and/or liquidity risk could result in a significantly
lower (higher) fair value estimate.
Financial Derivatives
Exchange-traded derivatives are valued using quoted market prices and are classified as Level 1. However, the majority of derivatives that we enter into are executed over-the-counter and are valued using
internal models. These derivatives are primarily classified as Level 2 as the readily observable market inputs to these models are validated to external sources. The external sources for these inputs include industry pricing services, or are
corroborated through recent trades, dealer quotes, yield curves, implied volatility or other market-related data. Level 2 financial derivatives are primarily estimated using a combination of Eurodollar future prices and
observable benchmark interest rate swaps to construct projected discounted cash flows. Financial derivatives that are priced using significant management judgment or assumptions are classified as
Level 3.
Fair value information for Level 3 financial derivatives is presented separately for interest rate contracts and other contracts.
Interest rate contracts include residential and commercial mortgage interest rate lock commitments and certain interest rate options. Other contracts include risk participation agreements, certain equity options and other types of contracts.
Significant unobservable inputs for residential mortgage loan commitments include the probability of funding and embedded servicing. The fair
value of residential mortgage loan commitments assets as of March 31, 2012 was $50 million compared with liabilities of $1 million. The probability of funding for residential mortgage loan commitments represents the expected proportion of loan
commitments in the pipeline that will fund. Additionally, embedded in the market price of the underlying loan is a value for retaining servicing of the loan once it is sold. Significant increases (decreases) in the fair value of a residential
mortgage loan commitment asset (liability) result when the probability of funding increases (decreases). Significant increases (decreases) in the fair value of a residential mortgage loan commitment result when the embedded servicing value increases
(decreases).
The fair value of commercial mortgage loan commitments assets as of March 31, 2012 was $23 million compared to liabilities
of $8 million. Significant unobservable inputs for commercial mortgage loan commitments include spread over the benchmark curve U.S. Treasury interest rate and embedded servicing value. The spread over the benchmark curve reflects management
assumptions regarding credit and liquidity risks. Embedded servicing value reflects the estimated value for retaining the right to service the underlying loan once it is sold. Significant increases (decreases) in the fair value of commercial
mortgage loan commitments result when the spread over the benchmark curve decreases (increases) or the embedded servicing value increases (decreases).
The fair value of interest rate options assets as of March 31, 2012 was $5 million compared to liabilities of $3 million. The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of the
interest rate options is expected interest rate volatility. Significant increases (decreases) in interest rate volatility would result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement.
The fair value of risk participation agreement assets as of March 31, 2012 was $6 million compared to liabilities of $4 million. The significant
unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of risk participation agreements are probability of default and loss severity. Significant increases
102 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
(decreases) in probability of default and loss severity would result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement.
The fair value of the other contracts liabilities as of March 31, 2012 was $77 million. The significant unobservable inputs for the other contracts for derivative liabilities include credit and
liquidity discount and spread over the benchmark curve that are deemed representative of current market conditions. Significant increases (decreases) in these assumptions would result in significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement.
The fair values of our derivatives are adjusted for nonperformance risk through the calculation of our Credit Valuation Adjustment (CVA). Our
CVA is computed using new loan pricing and considers externally available bond spreads, in conjunction with internal historical recovery observations.
Residential Mortgage Loans Held for Sale
We account for certain residential
mortgage loans originated for sale on a recurring basis at fair value. We have elected to account for certain RBC Bank (USA) residential mortgage loans held for sale at fair value. The election of the fair value option aligns the accounting for the
residential mortgages with related hedges.
Residential mortgage loans are valued based on quoted market prices, where available, prices for
other traded mortgage loans with similar characteristics, and purchase commitments and bid information received from market participants. These loans are regularly traded in active markets and observable pricing information is available from market
participants. The prices are adjusted as necessary to include the embedded servicing value in the loans and to take into consideration the specific characteristics of certain loans that are priced based on the pricing of similar loans. These
adjustments represent unobservable inputs to the valuation but are not considered significant given the relative insensitivity of the value to changes in these inputs to the fair value of the loans. Accordingly, residential mortgage loans held for
sale are classified as Level 2.
Residential Mortgage Servicing Rights
Residential mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) are carried at fair value on a recurring basis. Assumptions incorporated into the residential MSRs valuation model reflect managements best estimate of
factors that a market participant would use in valuing the residential MSRs. Although sales of residential MSRs do occur, residential MSRs do not trade in an active, open market with readily observable prices so the precise terms and conditions of
sales are not available. As a benchmark for the reasonableness of its residential MSRs fair value, PNC obtains opinions of value from independent parties (brokers). These brokers provided a range (+/- 10 bps) based upon their
own discounted cash flow calculations of our portfolio that reflect conditions in the secondary market, and any recently executed servicing
transactions. PNC compares its internally-developed residential MSRs value to the ranges of values received from the brokers. If our residential MSRs fair value falls outside of the brokers
ranges, management will assess whether a valuation adjustment is warranted. For the periods presented, PNCs residential MSRs value did not fall outside of the brokers ranges. We consider our residential MSRs value to represent a
reasonable estimate of fair value. Due to the nature of the valuation inputs, residential MSRs are classified as Level 3.
The significant
unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of residential MSRs are constant prepayment rates and spread over the benchmark curve. Significant increases (decreases) in prepayment rates and spread over the benchmark curve would result in
lower (higher) fair market value of residential MSRs.
Commercial Mortgage Loans Held for Sale
We account for certain commercial mortgage loans classified as held for sale at fair value. The election of the fair value option aligns the accounting
for the commercial mortgages with related hedges.
We determine the fair value of commercial mortgage loans held for sale by using a
discounted cash flow model. Fair value is determined using sale valuation assumptions that management believes a market participant would use in pricing the loans. When available, valuation assumptions include observable inputs based on the
benchmark LIBOR interest rate swap curve and whole loan sales. The significant unobservable input is managements assumption of the spread applied to the benchmark rate. The spread over the benchmark curve includes managements assumptions
of the impact of credit and liquidity risk. Significant increases (decreases) in the spread applied to the benchmark would result in a significantly lower (higher) asset value. The wide range of the spread over the benchmark curve is due to the
varying risk and underlying property characteristics within our portfolio. Based on the significance of unobservable inputs, we classified this portfolio as Level 3.
Equity Investments
The valuation of direct and indirect private equity investments
requires significant management judgment due to the absence of quoted market prices, inherent lack of liquidity and the long-term nature of such investments. The carrying values of direct and affiliated partnership interests reflect the expected
exit price and are based on various techniques including multiples of adjusted earnings of the entity, independent appraisals, anticipated financing and sale transactions with third parties, or the pricing used to value the entity in a recent
financing transaction. A multiple of adjusted earnings calculation is the valuation technique utilized most frequently and the multiple of earnings is the primary and most significant unobservable input used in such calculation. The multiple of
earnings is utilized in conjunction with portfolio
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 103
company financial results and our ownership interest in portfolio company securities to determine PNCs interest in the enterprise value of the portfolio company. Significant decreases
(increases) in the multiple of earnings could result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement. The magnitude of the change in fair value is dependent on the significance of the change in the multiple of earnings and the significance
of portfolio company adjusted earnings. Valuation inputs or analysis are supported by portfolio company or market documentation. Due to the size, private and unique nature of each portfolio company, lack of liquidity and the long-term nature of
investments, relevant benchmarking is not always feasible. A Valuation Committee reviews the portfolio company valuations on a quarterly basis and oversight is provided by senior management of the business.
We value indirect investments in private equity funds based on net asset value as provided in the financial statements that we receive from their
managers. Due to the time lag in our receipt of the financial information and based on a review of investments and valuation techniques applied, adjustments to the manager-provided value are made when available recent portfolio company information
or market information indicates a significant change in value from that provided by the manager of the fund. These investments are classified as Level 3.
Customer Resale Agreements
We have elected to account for structured resale
agreements, which are economically hedged using free-standing financial derivatives, at fair value. The fair value for structured resale agreements is determined using a model that includes observable market data such as interest rates as inputs.
Readily observable market inputs to this model can be validated to external sources, including yield curves, implied volatility or other market-related data. These instruments are classified as Level 2.
BlackRock Series C Preferred Stock
We have elected to account for the shares of BlackRock Series C Preferred Stock received in a stock exchange with BlackRock at fair value. We own
approximately 1.5 million of these shares after delivery of approximately 1.3 million shares in September 2011 pursuant to our obligation to partially fund a portion of certain BlackRock LTIP programs. The Series C Preferred Stock
economically hedges the BlackRock LTIP liability that is accounted for as a derivative. The fair value of the Series C Preferred Stock is determined using a third-party modeling approach, which includes both observable and unobservable inputs. This
approach considers expectations of a default/liquidation event and the use of liquidity discounts based on our inability to sell the security at a fair, open market price in a timely manner. Although dividends are equal to common shares and other
preferred series, significant transfer restrictions exist on our Series C shares for any purpose other
than to satisfy the LTIP obligation. Due to the significance of unobservable inputs, this security is classified as Level 3. Significant increases (decreases) in the liquidity discount would
result in a significantly lower (higher) asset value for the BlackRock Series C and vice versa for the BlackRock LTIP.
Loans
Loans accounted for at fair value include residential mortgage loans held for sale which were subsequently reclassified to portfolio
loans. These loans are transferred to portfolio loans if they are deemed unsaleable. These loans are valued similarly to residential mortgage loans held for sale and are classified as Level 2. This category also includes repurchased brokered home
equity loans. These loans are repurchased due to a breach of representations or warranties in the loan sales agreements and occur typically after the loan is in default. The fair value price is based on bids and market observations of transactions
of similar vintage. Because transaction details regarding the credit and underwriting quality are often unavailable, bid information from brokers and investors is heavily relied upon. Accordingly, these loans are classified as Level 3. A significant
input to the valuation includes a credit and liquidity discount that is deemed representative of current market conditions. Significant increases (decreases) in this assumption would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement.
Other assets
We have
entered into a prepaid forward contract with a financial institution to mitigate the risk of offsetting a portion of the Companys deferred compensation and supplemental incentive savings plan liabilities which are based on the Companys
stock price and are subject to market risk. The prepaid forward contract is initially valued at the transaction price and is subsequently valued by reference to the market price of the Companys stock in Other Assets at fair value. In addition,
deferred compensation and supplemental incentive savings plan participants may also invest in fixed income and equity-based funds. The Company utilizes a Rabbi Trust to hedge the returns by purchasing the same funds on which the participant returns
are based. The Rabbi Trust balances are recorded in Other Assets at fair value using the quoted market price. These assets are generally classified as Level 2. The asset category also includes FHLB interests and the retained interest only related to
the Small Business Administration (SBA) securitizations which are classified as Level 3. The fair value of the FHLB interests as of March 31, 2012 was $5 million. The fair value of the SBA securitization as of March 31, 2012 was $2
million. The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of these types of assets are constant prepayment rates and spread over the benchmark curve. Significant increases (decreases) in prepayment rates and spread over the
benchmark curve would result in lower (higher) fair market value of these assets.
104 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, including instruments for which PNC has
elected the fair value option, follow.
Fair Value Measurements Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2012 |
|
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
In millions |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total Fair Value |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total Fair Value |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Treasury and government agencies |
|
$ |
1,878 |
|
|
$ |
964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,842 |
|
|
$ |
1,659 |
|
|
$ |
2,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,717 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,792 |
|
Non-agency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,121 |
|
|
|
6,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,557 |
|
|
|
5,557 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,140 |
|
Non-agency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,756 |
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,531 |
|
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
5,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,882 |
|
|
|
787 |
|
|
|
3,669 |
|
State and municipal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
1,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,471 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
1,807 |
|
Other debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,683 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
3,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,713 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
2,762 |
|
Total debt securities |
|
|
1,878 |
|
|
|
43,918 |
|
|
|
7,264 |
|
|
|
53,060 |
|
|
|
1,659 |
|
|
|
39,812 |
|
|
|
6,729 |
|
|
|
48,200 |
|
Corporate stocks and other |
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
368 |
|
Total securities available for sale |
|
|
2,176 |
|
|
|
43,918 |
|
|
|
7,264 |
|
|
|
53,358 |
|
|
|
2,027 |
|
|
|
39,812 |
|
|
|
6,729 |
|
|
|
48,568 |
|
Financial derivatives (a) (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
8,454 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
8,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,150 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
9,210 |
|
Other contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
Total financial derivatives |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
8,607 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
8,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,396 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
9,463 |
|
Residential mortgage loans held for sale (c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,522 |
|
Trading securities (d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt (e) (f) |
|
|
969 |
|
|
|
1,581 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
2,589 |
|
|
|
1,058 |
|
|
|
1,371 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
2,468 |
|
Equity |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
Total trading securities |
|
|
1,016 |
|
|
|
1,584 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
2,639 |
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
1,374 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
2,513 |
|
Residential mortgage servicing rights (g) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
724 |
|
|
|
724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
647 |
|
|
|
647 |
|
Commercial mortgage loans held for sale (c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
843 |
|
|
|
843 |
|
Equity investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
865 |
|
|
|
865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
856 |
|
|
|
856 |
|
Indirect investments (h) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
648 |
|
Total equity investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,522 |
|
|
|
1,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,504 |
|
|
|
1,504 |
|
Customer resale agreements (i) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
732 |
|
Loans (j) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BlackRock Series C Preferred Stock (k) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
Total other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
639 |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
3,204 |
|
|
$ |
56,886 |
|
|
$ |
10,727 |
|
|
$ |
70,817 |
|
|
$ |
3,127 |
|
|
$ |
53,480 |
|
|
$ |
10,051 |
|
|
$ |
66,658 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial derivatives (b) (l) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
6,457 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
6,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,065 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
7,071 |
|
BlackRock LTIP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
Other contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
Total financial derivatives |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
6,619 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
6,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,298 |
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
7,606 |
|
Trading securities sold short (m) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt (e) |
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
$ |
997 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,016 |
|
Total trading securities sold short |
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
997 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,016 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
401 |
|
|
$ |
6,766 |
|
|
$ |
334 |
|
|
$ |
7,501 |
|
|
$ |
997 |
|
|
$ |
7,320 |
|
|
$ |
308 |
|
|
$ |
8,625 |
|
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 105
(a) |
Included in Other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. |
(b) |
Amounts at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are presented gross and are not reduced by the impact of legally enforceable master netting agreements that
allow PNC to net positive and negative positions and cash collateral held or placed with the same counterparty. At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, the net asset amounts were $2.1 billion and $2.4 billion and the net
liability amounts were $.6 billion and $.7 billion. |
(c) |
Included in Loans held for sale on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. PNC has elected the fair value option for certain commercial and residential mortgage loans held for
sale. |
(d) |
Fair value includes net unrealized gains of $53 million at March 31, 2012 compared with net unrealized gains of $102 million at December 31, 2011.
|
(e) |
Approximately 47% of these securities are residential mortgage-backed securities and 37% are US Treasury and government agencies securities at March 31, 2012.
Comparable amounts at December 31, 2011 were 57% and 34%, respectively. |
(f) |
At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, $.1 billion and $1.1 billion of residential mortgage-backed agency securities with embedded derivatives
were carried in Trading securities. |
(g) |
Included in Other intangible assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. |
(h) |
The indirect equity funds are not redeemable, but PNC receives distributions over the life of the partnership from liquidation of the underlying investments by the
investee. |
(i) |
Included in Federal funds sold and resale agreements on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. PNC has elected the fair value option for these items. |
(j) |
Included in Loans on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. |
(k) |
PNC has elected the fair value option for these shares. |
(l) |
Included in Other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. |
(m) |
Included in Other borrowed funds on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. |
Reconciliations of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using Level 3 inputs for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 follow.
Three Months Ended March 31, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total realized / unrealized
gains or losses for the period (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) Unrealized
gains (losses) on
assets and liabilities held on Consolidated Balance Sheet
at March 31,
2012 |
|
Level 3 Instruments Only In millions |
|
Fair Value Dec. 31, 2011 |
|
|
Included in
Earnings (*) |
|
|
Included in other
comprehensive
income |
|
|
Purchases |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
Issuances |
|
|
Settlements |
|
|
Transfers into Level 3 (b) |
|
|
Transfers out of Level 3 (b) |
|
|
Fair Value March 31, 2012 |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage- backed non-agency |
|
$ |
5,557 |
|
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
$ |
520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(163 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(242 |
) |
|
$ |
458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,121 |
|
|
$ |
(32 |
) |
Commercial mortgage- backed non-agency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
787 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
State and municipal |
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other debt |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Total securities available for sale |
|
|
6,729 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(201 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(278 |
) |
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,264 |
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
Financial derivatives |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
Trading securities - Debt |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Residential mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
647 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
724 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Commercial mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
843 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Equity investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct investments |
|
|
856 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
865 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Indirect investments |
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Total equity investments |
|
|
1,504 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,522 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Loans |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BlackRock Series C Preferred Stock |
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
Other |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets |
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
10,051 |
|
|
$ |
165 |
|
|
$ |
564 |
|
|
$ |
128 |
|
|
$ |
(293 |
) |
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
(377 |
) |
|
$ |
461 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
10,727 |
|
|
$ |
137 |
|
Total liabilities (c) |
|
$ |
308 |
|
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(50 |
) |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
334 |
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
106 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total realized / unrealized gains or losses for the period (a) |
|
|
Purchases |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
Issuances |
|
|
Settlements |
|
|
Fair Value
March 31,
2011 |
|
|
(*) Unrealized
gains (losses) on
assets and liabilities held on Consolidated Balance Sheet at
March 31,
2011 |
|
Level 3 Instruments Only In millions |
|
Fair Value Dec. 31, 2010 |
|
|
Included in Earnings (*) |
|
|
Included in other
comprehensive
income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage- backed non-agency |
|
$ |
7,233 |
|
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
$ |
255 |
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(353 |
) |
|
$ |
7,171 |
|
|
$ |
(28 |
) |
Asset-backed |
|
|
1,045 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
1,024 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
State and municipal |
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other debt |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Corporate stocks and other |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available for sale |
|
|
8,583 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(433 |
) |
|
|
8,610 |
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
Financial derivatives |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Trading securities - Debt |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Residential mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
1,033 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
1,109 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Commercial mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
877 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
858 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Equity investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct investments |
|
|
749 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
794 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Indirect investments |
|
|
635 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
Total equity investments |
|
|
1,384 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,457 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
Loans |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BlackRock Series C Preferred Stock |
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Other |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets |
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
12,428 |
|
|
$ |
166 |
|
|
$ |
313 |
|
|
$ |
265 |
|
|
$ |
(50 |
) |
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
$ |
(560 |
) |
|
$ |
12,601 |
|
|
$ |
132 |
|
Total liabilities (c) |
|
$ |
460 |
|
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(51 |
) |
|
$ |
476 |
|
|
$ |
64 |
|
(a) |
Losses for assets are bracketed while losses for liabilities are not. |
(b) |
PNCs policy is to recognize transfers in and transfers out as of the end of the reporting period. |
(c) |
Financial derivatives. |
Net gains (realized and unrealized) included in earnings relating to Level 3 assets and liabilities were
$88 million for the first three months of 2012 compared with net gains of $102 million for the first three months of 2011. These amounts included net unrealized gains of $116 million for the first three months of 2012 compared with net unrealized
gains of $68 million for the first three months of 2011. These amounts were included in noninterest income on the Consolidated Income Statement. These amounts also included amortization and accretion of $33 million for the first three months of 2012
compared with $24 million for the first three months of 2011. The amortization and accretion amounts were included in Interest income on the Consolidated Income Statement.
An instruments categorization within the hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is
significant to the fair value measurement. PNC reviews and updates fair value hierarchy classifications quarterly. Changes from one quarter to the next related to the observability of inputs to a fair value measurement may result in a
reclassification (transfer) of assets or liabilities between hierarchy levels. During the first three months of 2012 there were transfers of assets and liabilities from Level 2 to Level 3 of $460 million consisting primarily of mortgage-backed
securities as a result of a ratings downgrade which reduced the observability of valuation inputs. During the first three months of 2012 and 2011 there were no other material transfers of assets or liabilities between the hierarchy levels.
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 107
Quantitative Information about the significant unobservable inputs within Level 3 Recurring Assets and
Liabilities follow.
Fair Value Measurement Recurring Quantitative Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Instruments Only
In millions |
|
Fair Value March 31 2012 |
|
|
Valuation Techniques |
|
Unobservable Inputs |
|
Range (Weighted Average) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage - backed non-agency |
|
$ |
6,121 |
|
|
Priced by a third-party vendor |
|
Constant prepayment rate (CPR) |
|
1.0% - 32.0% (6.0%) |
|
|
(a |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
using a discounted cash flow |
|
Constant default rate (CDR) |
|
0.0% - 19.0% (6.0%) |
|
|
(a |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
pricing model (a) |
|
Loss Severity |
|
10.0% - 85.0% (48.0%) |
|
|
(a |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spread over the benchmark curve (b) |
|
525bps weighted average |
|
|
(a |
) |
Asset-backed |
|
|
752 |
|
|
Priced by a third-party vendor |
|
Constant prepayment rate (CPR) |
|
1.0% - 13.0% (3.0%) |
|
|
(a |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
using a discounted cash flow |
|
Constant default rate (CDR) |
|
1.0% - 25.0% (10.0%) |
|
|
(a |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
pricing model (a) |
|
Loss Severity |
|
10.0% - 100.0% (70.0%) |
|
|
(a |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spread over the benchmark curve (b) |
|
711bps weighted average |
|
|
(a |
) |
State and municipal |
|
|
153 |
|
|
Discounted cash flow |
|
Spread over the benchmark curve (b) |
|
125bps -310bps (183bps) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
Consensus pricing (c) |
|
Credit and Liquidity discount |
|
0.0% - 40.0% (9.0%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other debt |
|
|
55 |
|
|
Consensus pricing (c) |
|
Credit and Liquidity discount |
|
7.0% - 95.0% (52.0%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt securities |
|
|
7,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial derivatives assets Interest rate contracts |
|
|
50 |
|
|
Discounted cash flow |
|
Probability of funding |
|
61.3% - 75.2% (67.6%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Embedded servicing value |
|
0.0% - 2.0% (0.9%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
Discounted cash flow |
|
Spread over the benchmark curve (b) |
|
65bps - 360bps (144bps) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Embedded servicing value |
|
0.8% - 2.6% (1.6%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
Option model |
|
Interest rate volatility |
|
24.0% - 33.0% (29.0%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other contracts |
|
|
6 |
|
|
Discounted cash flow |
|
Probability of default |
|
4.0% - 100.0% (32.0%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Severity |
|
28.0% - 40.0% (32.0%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities - Debt |
|
|
39 |
|
|
Consensus pricing (c) |
|
Credit and Liquidity discount |
|
8.0% - 40.0% (19.0%) |
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
724 |
|
|
Discounted cash flow |
|
Constant prepayment rate |
|
4.1% - 54.9% (18.6%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spread over the benchmark curve (b) |
|
939bps - 1,948bps (1,168bps) |
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
840 |
|
|
Discounted cash flow |
|
Spread over the benchmark curve (b) |
|
440bps - 2,780bps (864bps) |
|
|
|
|
Equity investments - Direct investments |
|
|
865 |
|
|
Multiple of adjusted earnings |
|
Multiple of earnings |
|
4.5 - 11.0 (7.1) |
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
6 |
|
|
Consensus pricing (c) |
|
Credit and Liquidity discount |
|
40.0% - 97.0% (66.0%) |
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BlackRock Series C Preferred Stock |
|
|
241 |
|
|
Consensus pricing (c) |
|
Liquidity discount |
|
22.5% |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
5 |
|
|
Discounted cash flow |
|
Constant prepayment rate |
|
8.5% - 11.0% (10.0%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Discounted cash flow |
|
Constant prepayment rate |
|
13.7% - 13.7% (13.7%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spread over the benchmark curve (b) |
|
650bps - 650bps (650bps) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets (d) |
|
$ |
10,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial derivative liabilities Interest rate contracts |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
Discounted cash flow |
|
Spread over the benchmark curve (b) |
|
65bps - 360bps (116bps) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Embedded servicing value |
|
0.8% - 2.6% (1.7%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Discounted cash flow |
|
Probability of funding |
|
61.3% - 75.2% (67.6%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Embedded servicing value |
|
0.0% - 2.0% (0.9%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
Option model |
|
Interest rate volatility |
|
24.0% - 33.0% (29.0%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BlackRock LTIP |
|
|
241 |
|
|
Consensus pricing (c) |
|
Liquidity discount |
|
22.5% |
|
|
|
|
Other contracts |
|
|
77 |
|
|
Discounted cash flow |
|
Credit and Liquidity discount |
|
39.0% - 99.0% (48.0%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spread over the benchmark curve (b) |
|
(132bps) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
Discounted cash flow |
|
Probability of default |
|
1.0% - 100.0% (22.0) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Severity |
|
5.0% - 40.0% (30.0%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
$ |
334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
(a) |
Level 3 residential mortgage-backed non-agency and asset-backed securities with fair values as of March 31, 2012 totaling $5,343 million and $724 million,
respectively, were priced by a third-party vendor using a discounted cash flow pricing model, that incorporates consensus pricing, where available. The significant unobservable inputs for these securities were provided by the third-party vendor and
are disclosed in the table. Our procedures to validate the prices provided by the third-party vendor related to these securities are discussed further in the fair value measurement section of this Note 8. Certain level 3 residential mortgage-backed
non-agency and asset-backed securities with fair value as of March 31, 2012 of $778 million and $28 million, respectively, were valued using a pricing source, such as, a dealer quote or comparable security price, for which the significant
unobservable inputs used to determine the price were not reasonably available. |
(b) |
The assumed yield spread over the benchmark curve for each instrument is generally intended to incorporate non-interest-risks such as credit and liquidity risks.
|
(c) |
Consensus pricing refers to fair value estimates that are generally internally developed using information such as dealer quotes or other third-party provided
valuations or comparable asset prices. |
(d) |
Total assets exclude the amount of indirect investments of $657 million which are scoped out of this disclosure because the fair value is estimated using the net asset
value per share of the investments. |
OTHER FINANCIAL ASSETS ACCOUNTED
FOR AT FAIR VALUE ON A NONRECURRING BASIS
We may be required to measure certain other financial assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These adjustments to fair value usually result from the application of lower-of-cost-or-fair value
accounting or write-downs of individual assets due to impairment.
Nonaccrual Loans
The amounts below for nonaccrual loans represent the carrying value of loans for which adjustments are primarily based on the appraised value of the
collateral or the net book value of the collateral from the borrowers most recent financial statements if no appraisal is available. As part of the appraisal process, persons ordering or reviewing appraisals are independent of the asset
manager. Appraisals must be provided by licensed or certified appraisers and conform to the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. For loans secured by commercial properties where the underlying collateral is in excess of $250,000,
appraisals are obtained at least annually. In certain instances (e.g., physical changes in the property), a more recent appraisal is obtained. Additionally, borrower ordered appraisals are not permitted, and PNC ordered appraisals are regularly
reviewed. For loans secured by commercial properties where the underlying collateral is $250,000 and less, there is no requirement to obtain an appraisal. In instances where an appraisal is not obtained, the collateral value is determined consistent
with external third-party appraisal standards, by an internal person independent of the asset manager. We have a real estate valuation services group whose sole function is to manage the real estate appraisal solicitation and evaluation process for
commercial loans. All third-party appraisals are reviewed by this group, including consideration of comments/questions on the appraisal by the reviewer, customer relationship manager, credit officer, and underwriter. Upon resolving these
comments/questions through discussions with the third-party appraiser, adjustments to the initial appraisal may occur and be incorporated into the final issued appraisal report.
If an appraisal is outdated due to changed project or market conditions, or if the net book value is utilized, management uses a Loss Given Default (LGD) percentage which represents the exposure PNC
expects to lose in the event a borrower defaults on an obligation. Accordingly, LGD is a function of
collateral recovery rates and loan-to-value. Collateral recovery rates can vary widely (15% 76% at March 31, 2012) based upon collateral type and represent the expected recovery
amount on defaulted loans from the collateral after workout costs. Those rates are established based upon actual PNC loss experience and external market data. In instances where we have agreed to sell the property to a third party, the fair value is
based on the contractual sales price adjusted for costs to sell. In these instances, the most significant unobservable input is the appraised value or the sales price. The estimated costs to sell are incremental direct costs to transact a sale such
as broker commissions, legal, closing costs and title transfer fees. The costs must be essential to the sale and would not have been incurred if the decision to sell had not been made. The cost to sell is based on costs associated with our actual
sales of commercial and residential OREO and other foreclosed assets which are assessed annually.
Loans Held for Sale
The amounts below for loans held for sale represent the carrying value of commercial mortgage loans which are intended to be sold with
servicing retained. The fair value is determined using discounted cash flows. Significant observable market data includes the applicable benchmark U.S. Treasury interest rates. Significant unobservable inputs include a spread over the benchmark
curve and the embedded servicing value. Significant increases (decreases) to the spread over the benchmark curve would result in a significantly lower (higher) carrying value of the assets. Significant increases (decreases) in the embedded servicing
value would result in significantly higher (lower) carrying value.
Equity Investments
The amounts below for equity investments represent the carrying value of Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) investments held for sale calculated using
a discounted cash flow model. The significant unobservable input is managements estimate of required market rate of return. The market rate of return is based on comparison to recent LIHTC sales in the market. Significant increases (decreases)
in this input would result in a significantly lower (higher) carrying value of the investments.
Commercial Mortgage Servicing Rights
The amounts below for commercial MSRs are periodically evaluated for impairment and reflect an impairment of three strata at
March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. For purposes of impairment, the commercial MSRs are
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 109
stratified based on asset type, which characterizes the predominant risk of the underlying financial asset. The fair value of commercial MSRs is estimated by using a discounted cash flow model
incorporating unobservable inputs for assumptions as to constant prepayment rates, discount rates and other factors. Significant increases (decreases) in constant prepayment rates and discount rates would result in significantly lower (higher)
commercial MSR value determined based on current market conditions and expectations.
OREO and Foreclosed Assets
The amounts below for OREO and foreclosed assets represent the carrying value of OREO and foreclosed assets for which valuation adjustments were recorded
subsequent to the transfer to OREO. Valuation adjustments are based on the fair value less cost to sell of the property. Fair value is based on appraised value or sales price. As part of the appraisal process, persons ordering or reviewing
appraisals are independent of the asset manager. The ongoing performance of appraisers is regularly reviewed. Additionally, appraisals must be provided by licensed or certified appraisers and conform to the Uniform Standards of Professional
Appraisal Practice. For commercial properties in excess of $250,000 appraisals are obtained at least annually. In certain instances (e.g., physical changes in the property), a more recent appraisal is obtained. For commercial properties of $250,000
and less, there is no requirement to obtain an appraisal. In instances where an appraisal is not obtained, the collateral value is determined consistent with external third party appraisal standards, by an internal person independent of the asset
manager. In instances where we have agreed to sell the property to a third party, the fair value is based on the contractual sale price adjusted for costs to sell. The significant unobservable inputs for OREO and foreclosed assets are the appraised
value or the sales price. The estimated costs to sell are incremental directs costs to transact a sale such as broker commissions, legal, closing costs and title transfer fees. The costs must be essential to the
sale and would not have been incurred if the decision to sell had not been made. The costs to sell are based on costs associated with our actual sales of commercial and residential OREO which are
assessed annually. We have a real estate valuation services group whose sole function is to manage the real estate appraisal solicitation and evaluation process for commercial loans. All third-party appraisals are reviewed by this group, including
consideration of comments/questions on the appraisal by the reviewer, asset manager, and credit officer. Upon resolving these comments/questions through discussions with the third-party appraiser, adjustments to the initial appraisal may occur and
be incorporated into the final issued appraisal report.
Long-Lived Assets Held for Sale
The amounts below for Long-lived assets held for sale represent the carrying value of the asset for which valuation adjustments were recorded during the
current year and subsequent to the transfer to Long-lived assets held for sale. Valuation adjustments are based on the fair value of the property less an estimated cost to sell. Fair value is determined either by a recent appraisal, recent sales
offer or changes in market or property conditions. Appraisals are provided by licensed or certified appraisers. Where we have agreed to sell the property to a third party, the fair value is based on the contractual sale price. The significant
unobservable inputs for long-lived assets held for sale are the appraised value, the sales price or the changes in market or property conditions. Changes in market or property conditions are subjectively determined by management through observation
of the physical condition of the property along with the condition of properties in the surrounding market place. The availability and recent sales of similar properties is also considered. The range of fair values vary significantly as this
category often includes smaller properties such as offsite ATM locations and smaller rural branches up to large commercial buildings, operation centers or urban branches.
FAIR
VALUE MEASUREMENTS NONRECURRING (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Gains
(Losses) Three months ended |
|
In millions |
|
March 31 2012 |
|
|
December 31 2011 |
|
|
March 31 2012 |
|
|
March 31 2011 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans |
|
$ |
223 |
|
|
$ |
253 |
|
|
$ |
(86 |
) |
|
$ |
(71 |
) |
Loans held for sale |
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Equity investments |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
OREO and foreclosed assets |
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
Long-lived assets held for sale |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,006 |
|
|
$ |
1,081 |
|
|
$ |
(124 |
) |
|
$ |
(137 |
) |
(a) |
All Level 3, except for $15 million included in Loans held for sale which is categorized as Level 2 as of March 31, 2012. |
110 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
Quantitative Information about the significant unobservable inputs within Level 3 Nonrecurring Assets
follow.
Fair Value Measurements Nonrecurring Quantitative Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Instruments Only
In millions |
|
Fair Value March 31 2012 |
|
|
Valuation Techniques |
|
Unobservable Inputs |
|
Range (Weighted Average)
(a) |
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans |
|
$ |
223 |
|
|
Fair value of collateral |
|
Loss Severity |
|
9.0% - 83.0% (45.0%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appraised value |
|
$.2 - $16.5 ($4.4) |
Loans held for sale |
|
|
116 |
|
|
Discounted cash flow |
|
Spread over the benchmark curve (b) |
|
68bps - 293bps (214bps) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Embedded servicing value |
|
0.80% - 2.55% (1.62%) |
Equity investments |
|
|
4 |
|
|
Discounted cash flow |
|
Market rate of return |
|
6.0% |
Commercial mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
418 |
|
|
Discounted cash flow |
|
Constant prepayment rate (CPR) |
|
13.0% - 30.00% (21.95%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate |
|
6.00% - 9.00% (7.88%) |
OREO and foreclosed assets |
|
|
223 |
|
|
Fair value of collateral |
|
Appraised value |
|
$0 - $11.0 ($0.5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales price |
|
$0 - $5.0 ($0.2) |
Long-lived assets held for sale |
|
|
7 |
|
|
Market Comparables |
|
Appraised value |
|
$0.0 - $0.9 ($0.3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales price |
|
$0.1 - $1.3 ($0.4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments for market/property conditions |
|
$0.0 - $0.1 ($0.0) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
991 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Where dollar amounts are disclosed, the amounts represent the lowest and highest fair value of the respective assets in the population except for adjustments for
market/property conditions which represents the range of adjustments to individual properties. |
(b) |
The assumed yield spread over benchmark curve for each instrument is generally intended to incorporate non-interest-rate risks such as credit and liquidity risks.
|
FINANCIAL ASSETS ACCOUNTED FOR
UNDER FAIR VALUE OPTION
Refer to the Fair Value Measurement section of
this Note 8 regarding the fair value of commercial mortgage loans held for sale, residential mortgage loans held for sale, certain portfolio loans, customer resale agreements, and BlackRock Series C Preferred Stock.
Commercial Mortgage Loans Held for Sale
Interest income on these loans is recorded as earned and reported on the Consolidated Income Statement in Other interest income. The impact on earnings of
offsetting economic hedges is not reflected in these amounts. Changes in fair value due to instrument-specific credit risk for both the first three months of 2012 and 2011 were not material.
Residential Mortgage Loans Held for Sale and in Portfolio
Interest income on these loans
is recorded as earned and reported on the Consolidated Income Statement in Other interest income. Throughout 2011 and the first three months
of 2012, certain residential mortgage loans for which we elected the fair value option were subsequently reclassified to portfolio loans. Changes in fair value due to instrument-specific credit
risk for the first three months of 2012 and 2011 were not material.
Customer Resale Agreements
Interest income on structured resale agreements is reported on the Consolidated Income Statement in Other interest income. Changes in fair value due to
instrument-specific credit risk for both the first three months of 2012 and 2011 were not material.
Residential Mortgage-Backed Agency
Securities with Embedded Derivatives
Interest income on securities is reported on the Consolidated Income Statement in Interest income.
The changes in fair value included in noninterest income for items for which we elected the fair value option follow.
Fair Value Option
Changes in Fair Value (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains (Losses) Three months ended |
|
In millions |
|
March 31 2012 |
|
|
March 31 2011 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer resale agreements |
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
Residential mortgage-backed agency securities with embedded derivatives (b) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
Residential mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
Residential mortgage loans portfolio |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
BlackRock Series C Preferred Stock |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
(a) |
The impact on earnings of offsetting hedged items or hedging instruments is not reflected in these amounts. |
(b) |
These residential mortgage-backed agency securities with embedded derivatives were carried as trading securities. |
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 111
Fair values and aggregate unpaid principal balances of items for which we elected the fair value option
follow.
Fair Value Option Fair Value and Principal Balances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Aggregate Unpaid Principal Balance |
|
|
Difference |
|
March 31, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer resale agreements |
|
$ |
688 |
|
|
$ |
648 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed agency securities with embedded derivatives (a) |
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Residential mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performing loans |
|
|
1,360 |
|
|
|
1,320 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Loans 90 days or more past due |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
Nonaccrual loans |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Total |
|
|
1,387 |
|
|
|
1,360 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
Commercial mortgage loans held for sale (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performing loans |
|
|
828 |
|
|
|
963 |
|
|
|
(135 |
) |
Nonaccrual loans |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Total |
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
(141 |
) |
Residential mortgage loansportfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performing loans |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
Loans 90 days or more past due (c) |
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
Nonaccrual loans |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
(116 |
) |
Total |
|
$ |
273 |
|
|
$ |
427 |
|
|
$ |
(154 |
) |
December 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer resale agreements |
|
$ |
732 |
|
|
$ |
686 |
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed agency securities with embedded derivatives (a) |
|
|
1,058 |
|
|
|
864 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
Residential mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performing loans |
|
|
1,501 |
|
|
|
1,439 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
Loans 90 days or more past due |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Nonaccrual loans |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Total |
|
|
1,522 |
|
|
|
1,468 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Commercial mortgage loans held for sale (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performing loans |
|
|
829 |
|
|
|
962 |
|
|
|
(133 |
) |
Nonaccrual loans |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
Total |
|
|
843 |
|
|
|
989 |
|
|
|
(146 |
) |
Residential mortgage loansportfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performing loans |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
Loans 90 days or more past due (c) |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Nonaccrual loans |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
(113 |
) |
Total |
|
$ |
227 |
|
|
$ |
368 |
|
|
$ |
(141 |
) |
(a) |
These residential mortgage-backed agency securities with embedded derivatives were carried as Trading securities. |
(b) |
There were no loans 90 days or more past due within this category at March 31, 2012 or December 31, 2011. |
(c) |
The majority of these loans are government insured loans, which positively impacts the fair value. |
112 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
ADDITIONAL FAIR VALUE INFORMATION
RELATED TO FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2012 |
|
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
Carrying Amount |
|
|
Fair Value Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
In millions |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from bank |
|
$ |
4,162 |
|
|
$ |
4,162 |
|
|
$ |
4,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,105 |
|
|
$ |
4,105 |
|
Short-term assets |
|
|
4,630 |
|
|
|
4,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,462 |
|
|
|
4,462 |
|
Trading securities |
|
|
2,639 |
|
|
|
2,639 |
|
|
|
1,016 |
|
|
|
1,584 |
|
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
|
2,513 |
|
|
|
2,513 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
64,554 |
|
|
|
64,939 |
|
|
|
2,422 |
|
|
|
55,219 |
|
|
|
7,298 |
|
|
|
60,634 |
|
|
|
61,018 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
2,456 |
|
|
|
2,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,387 |
|
|
|
1,070 |
|
|
|
2,936 |
|
|
|
2,939 |
|
Net loans (excludes leases) |
|
|
165,426 |
|
|
|
167,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
167,207 |
|
|
|
148,254 |
|
|
|
151,167 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
4,255 |
|
|
|
4,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,485 |
|
|
|
1,770 |
|
|
|
4,019 |
|
|
|
4,019 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
1,152 |
|
|
|
1,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,167 |
|
|
|
1,115 |
|
|
|
1,118 |
|
Financial derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Designated as hedging instruments under GAAP |
|
|
1,732 |
|
|
|
1,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,888 |
|
|
|
1,888 |
|
Not designated as hedging instruments under GAAP |
|
|
6,971 |
|
|
|
6,971 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
6,875 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
7,575 |
|
|
|
7,575 |
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
257,977 |
|
|
$ |
260,426 |
|
|
$ |
7,612 |
|
|
$ |
74,179 |
|
|
$ |
178,635 |
|
|
$ |
237,501 |
|
|
$ |
240,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand, savings and money market deposits |
|
$ |
174,512 |
|
|
$ |
174,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
174,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
156,335 |
|
|
$ |
156,335 |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
31,615 |
|
|
|
31,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,632 |
|
|
|
31,882 |
|
Borrowed funds |
|
|
42,821 |
|
|
|
45,029 |
|
|
$ |
393 |
|
|
|
43,768 |
|
|
$ |
868 |
|
|
|
36,966 |
|
|
|
39,064 |
|
Financial derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Designated as hedging instruments under GAAP |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
Not designated as hedging instruments under GAAP |
|
|
6,843 |
|
|
|
6,843 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
6,501 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
7,490 |
|
|
|
7,490 |
|
Unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit |
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
Total Liabilities |
|
$ |
256,137 |
|
|
$ |
258,568 |
|
|
$ |
401 |
|
|
$ |
256,737 |
|
|
$ |
1,430 |
|
|
$ |
232,762 |
|
|
$ |
235,110 |
|
The aggregate fair values in the table above do not represent the total market value of PNCs assets
and liabilities as the table excludes the following:
|
|
|
real and personal property, |
|
|
|
loan customer relationships, |
|
|
|
deposit customer intangibles, |
|
|
|
retail branch networks, |
|
|
|
fee-based businesses, such as asset management and brokerage, and |
|
|
|
trademarks and brand names. |
We used the following methods and assumptions to estimate fair value amounts for financial instruments.
GENERAL
For
short-term financial instruments realizable in three months or less, the carrying amount reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheet approximates fair value. Unless otherwise stated, the rates used in discounted cash flow analyses are based on market
yield curves.
CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS
The carrying amounts reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheet for cash and due from banks approximate fair values.
For purposes of this disclosure only, cash and due from banks include the following:
|
|
|
interest-earning deposits with banks. |
Cash and due from banks are classified as Level 1.
SHORT-TERM ASSETS
The carrying amounts reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheet for short-term investments approximate fair values primarily due to their short-term nature. For purposes of this disclosure only,
short-term assets include the following:
|
|
|
federal funds sold and resale agreements, |
|
|
|
customers acceptances, and |
|
|
|
accrued interest receivable. |
Short-term assets are classified as Level 2.
SECURITIES
Securities include both the investment securities (comprised of available for sale and held to maturity securities) and trading portfolios. We primarily
use prices obtained from pricing services, dealer quotes or recent trades to determine the fair value of securities. As of March 31, 2012, 86% of the
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 113
positions in these portfolios were priced by pricing services provided by third party vendors. The third-party vendors use a variety of methods when pricing securities that incorporate relevant
market data to arrive at an estimate of what a buyer in the marketplace would pay for a security under current market conditions. One of the vendors prices are set with reference to market activity for highly liquid assets such as U.S.
Treasury and agency securities and agency mortgage-backed securities, and matrix pricing for other asset classes, such as commercial mortgage and other asset-backed securities. Another vendor primarily uses pricing models considering adjustments for
ratings, spreads, matrix pricing and prepayments for the instruments we value using this service, such as non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities, agency adjustable rate mortgage securities, agency CMOs, commercial mortgage-backed
securities, and municipal bonds. Management uses various methods and techniques to validate prices obtained from pricing services and dealers, including reference to another third-party source, by reviewing valuations of comparable instruments, or
by comparison to internal valuations.
NET LOANS AND LOANS
HELD FOR SALE
Fair values are estimated based on the discounted value of expected net
cash flows incorporating assumptions about prepayment rates, net credit losses and servicing fees. For purchased impaired loans, fair value is assumed to equal PNCs carrying value, which represents the present value of expected future
principal and interest cash flows, as adjusted for any ALLL recorded for these loans. See Note 6 Purchased Loans for additional information. For revolving home equity loans and commercial credit lines, this fair value does not include any amount for
new loans or the related fees that will be generated from the existing customer relationships. Nonaccrual loans are valued at their estimated recovery value. Also refer to the Fair Value Measurement and Fair Value Option sections of this Note 8
regarding the fair value of commercial and residential mortgage loans held for sale. Loans are presented net of the ALLL and do not include future accretable discounts related to purchased impaired loans.
OTHER ASSETS
Other assets as shown in the preceding table include the following:
|
|
|
equity investments carried at cost and fair value, and |
|
|
|
BlackRock Series C Preferred Stock. |
Investments accounted for under the equity method, including our investment in BlackRock, are not included in the preceding table.
Refer to the Fair Value Measurement section of this Note 8 regarding the fair value of equity investments.
The aggregate carrying value of our investments that are carried at cost and FHLB and FRB stock was $2.1
billion at March 31, 2012 and $1.9 billion as of December 31, 2011, both of which approximate fair value at each date.
MORTGAGE SERVICING ASSETS
Fair value is based on the present value of the estimated future cash flows, incorporating assumptions as to prepayment rates, discount rates, default rates, escrow balances, interest rates, cost to
service and other factors.
The key valuation assumptions for commercial and residential mortgage loan servicing assets at March 31, 2012
and December 31, 2011 are included in Note 9 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.
CUSTOMER RESALE
AGREEMENTS
Refer to the Fair Value Measurement section of this Note 8 regarding the fair value of customer resale
agreements.
DEPOSITS
The carrying amounts of noninterest-bearing demand and interest-bearing money market and savings deposits approximate fair values. For time deposits, which include foreign deposits, fair values are
estimated based on the discounted value of expected net cash flows assuming current interest rates. All deposits are classified as Level 2.
BORROWED FUNDS
The carrying amounts of Federal funds purchased, commercial paper, repurchase agreements, trading securities sold short, cash collateral, other short-term borrowings, acceptances outstanding and accrued
interest payable are considered to be their fair value because of their short-term nature. For all other borrowed funds, fair values are estimated primarily based on dealer quotes or discounted cash flow analysis.
UNFUNDED LOAN COMMITMENTS AND LETTERS OF
CREDIT
The fair value of unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit is determined from a market participants
view including the impact of changes in interest rates, credit and other factors. Because our obligation on substantially all unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit varies with changes in interest rates, these instruments are subject to
little fluctuation in fair value due to changes in interest rates. We establish a liability on these facilities related to their creditworthiness. These instruments are classified as Level 3.
FINANCIAL DERIVATIVES
Refer to the Fair Value
Measurement section of this Note 8 regarding the fair value of financial derivatives.
114 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
NOTE 9 GOODWILL AND OTHER
INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Changes in goodwill by business segment during the first three months of 2012 follow:
Changes in Goodwill by Business Segment (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
Retail Banking |
|
|
Corporate & Institutional Banking |
|
|
Asset Management Group |
|
|
Residential Mortgage Banking |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
5,394 |
|
|
$ |
2,763 |
|
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
8,285 |
|
RBC Bank (USA) Acquisition |
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
954 |
|
Other |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(70 |
) |
March 31, 2012 |
|
$ |
5,795 |
|
|
$ |
3,214 |
|
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
9,169 |
|
(a) |
The Non-Strategic Assets Portfolio business segment does not have any goodwill allocated to it. |
Changes in goodwill and other intangible assets during the first three months of 2012 follow:
Summary of Changes in Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
Customer- Related |
|
|
Servicing Rights |
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
8,285 |
|
|
$ |
742 |
|
|
$ |
1,117 |
|
Additions/adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RBC Bank (USA) Acquisition |
|
|
954 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Other (a) |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage and other loan servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
|
Net impairment charge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
Amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
March 31, 2012 |
|
$ |
9,169 |
|
|
$ |
866 |
|
|
$ |
1,153 |
|
(a) |
Primarily related to correction of amount for an acquisition affecting prior periods. |
Assets and liabilities of acquired entities are recorded at estimated fair value as of the acquisition date.
The gross carrying amount, accumulated amortization and net carrying amount of other intangible assets by major category consisted of the following:
Other Intangible Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
March 31 2012 |
|
|
December 31 2011 |
|
Customer-related and other intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amount |
|
$ |
1,689 |
|
|
$ |
1,525 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(823 |
) |
|
|
(783 |
) |
Net carrying amount |
|
$ |
866 |
|
|
$ |
742 |
|
Mortgage and other loan servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amount |
|
$ |
2,082 |
|
|
$ |
2,009 |
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
|
(197 |
) |
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(737 |
) |
|
|
(695 |
) |
Net carrying amount |
|
$ |
1,153 |
|
|
$ |
1,117 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,019 |
|
|
$ |
1,859 |
|
Our other intangible assets have finite lives and are amortized primarily on a straight-line basis. Core
deposit intangibles are amortized on an accelerated basis.
For customer-related and other intangibles, the estimated remaining useful lives
range from 1 year to 12 years, with a weighted-average remaining useful life of 9 years.
Amortization expense on existing intangible assets
follows:
Amortization Expense on Existing Intangible Assets
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
Three months ended March 31, 2012 |
|
$ |
71 |
|
Three months ended March 31, 2011 |
|
|
70 |
|
Remainder of 2012 |
|
|
205 |
|
2013 |
|
|
243 |
|
2014 |
|
|
217 |
|
2015 |
|
|
204 |
|
2016 |
|
|
175 |
|
2017 |
|
|
139 |
|
Changes in commercial mortgage servicing rights follow:
Commercial Mortgage Servicing Rights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
January 1 |
|
$ |
468 |
|
|
$ |
665 |
|
Additions (a) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
Net impairment charge |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
Amortization expense |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
March 31 |
|
$ |
428 |
|
|
$ |
645 |
|
Valuation allowance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1 |
|
$ |
(197 |
) |
|
$ |
(40 |
) |
Provision |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Other (b) |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
|
(75 |
) |
(a) |
Additions for the first three months of 2012 and first three months of 2011 included $9 and $15 million, respectively, from loans sold with servicing
retained. Additions |
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 115
|
for the first three months of 2011 included $28 million from purchases of servicing rights from third parties. |
(b) |
Represents impairment of servicing rights considered to be permanent. |
We recognize as an other intangible asset the right to service mortgage loans for others. Commercial MSRs are purchased and originated when loans are sold with servicing retained. Commercial MSRs are
initially recorded at fair value. These rights are subsequently accounted for at the lower of amortized cost or fair value, and are substantially amortized in proportion to and over the period of estimated net servicing income of 5 to 10 years.
Commercial MSRs are periodically evaluated for impairment. For purposes of impairment, the commercial MSRs are stratified based on asset
type, which characterizes the predominant risk of the underlying financial asset. If the carrying amount of any individual stratum exceeds its fair value, a valuation reserve is established with a corresponding charge to Corporate services on our
Consolidated Income Statement.
The fair value of commercial MSRs is estimated by using a discounted cash flow model incorporating
unobservable inputs for assumptions as to constant prepayment rates, discount rates and other factors determined based on current market conditions and expectations.
Changes in the residential MSRs follow:
Residential Mortgage Servicing Rights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
January 1 |
|
$ |
647 |
|
|
$ |
1,033 |
|
Additions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From loans sold with servicing retained |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
RBC Bank (USA) Acquisition |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
Changes in fair value due to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time and payoffs (a) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
Other (b) |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
March 31 |
|
$ |
724 |
|
|
$ |
1,109 |
|
Unpaid principal balance of loans serviced for others at March 31 |
|
$ |
121,129 |
|
|
$ |
127,246 |
|
(a) |
Represents decrease in MSR value due to passage of time, including the impact from both regularly scheduled loan principal payments and loans that were paid down or
paid off during the period. |
(b) |
Represents MSR value changes resulting primarily from market-driven changes in interest rates.
|
We recognize mortgage servicing right assets on residential real estate loans when we retain the obligation
to service these loans upon sale and the servicing fee is more than adequate compensation. MSRs are subject to declines in value principally from actual or expected prepayment of the underlying loans and defaults. We manage this risk by
economically hedging the fair value of MSRs with securities and derivative instruments which are expected to increase (or decrease) in value when the
value of MSRs declines (or increases).
The fair value of residential MSRs is estimated by using a cash flow valuation model which calculates
the present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows, taking into consideration actual and expected mortgage loan prepayment rates, discount rates, servicing costs, and other economic factors which are determined based on current market
conditions.
The fair value of residential and commercial MSRs and significant inputs to the valuation models as of March 31, 2012 are
shown in the tables below. The expected and actual rates of mortgage loan prepayments are significant factors driving the fair value. Management uses a third party model to estimate future residential mortgage loan prepayments and internal
proprietary models to estimate future commercial mortgage loan prepayments. These models have been refined based on current market conditions. Future interest rates are another important factor in the valuation of MSRs. Management utilizes market
implied forward interest rates to estimate the future direction of mortgage and discount rates. The forward rates utilized are derived from the current yield curve for U.S. dollar interest rate swaps and are consistent with pricing of capital
markets instruments. Changes in the shape and slope of the forward curve in future periods may result in volatility in the fair value estimate.
A sensitivity analysis of the hypothetical effect on the fair value of MSRs to adverse changes in key assumptions is presented below. These sensitivities
do not include the impact of the related hedging activities. Changes in fair value generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in the assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, the effect of a
variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of the MSRs is calculated independently without changing any other assumption. In reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another (for example, changes in mortgage interest
rates, which drive changes in prepayment rate estimates, could result in changes in the interest rate spread), which could either magnify or counteract the sensitivities.
116 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
The following tables set forth the fair value of commercial and residential MSRs and the sensitivity
analysis of the hypothetical effect on the fair value of MSRs to immediate adverse changes of 10% and 20% in those assumptions:
Commercial Mortgage Loan Servicing Assets Key Valuation Assumptions
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars in millions |
|
March 31 2012 |
|
December 31 2011 |
Fair value |
|
$433 |
|
$471 |
Weighted-average life (years) |
|
5.8 |
|
5.9 |
Prepayment rate range |
|
13%-30% |
|
13%-28% |
Decline in fair value from 10% adverse change |
|
$5 |
|
$6 |
Decline in fair value from 20% adverse change |
|
$9 |
|
$11 |
Effective discount rate range |
|
6%-9% |
|
6%-9% |
Decline in fair value from 10% adverse change |
|
$8 |
|
$9 |
Decline in fair value from 20% adverse change |
|
$16 |
|
$18 |
Residential Mortgage Loan Servicing Assets Key Valuation Assumptions
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars in millions |
|
March 31 2012 |
|
December 31 2011 |
Fair value |
|
$724 |
|
$647 |
Weighted-average life (years) |
|
4.3 |
|
3.6 |
Weighted-average constant prepayment rate |
|
18.60% |
|
22.10% |
Decline in fair value from 10% adverse change |
|
$47 |
|
$44 |
Decline in fair value from 20% adverse change |
|
$90 |
|
$84 |
Weighted-average option adjusted spread |
|
11.68% |
|
11.77% |
Decline in fair value from 10% adverse change |
|
$29 |
|
$25 |
Decline in fair value from 20% adverse change |
|
$57 |
|
$48 |
Fees from mortgage and other loan servicing comprised of contractually specified servicing fees, late fees, and ancillary
fees follows:
Fees from Mortgage and Other Loan Servicing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
$ |
154 |
|
|
$ |
159 |
|
We also generate servicing fees from fee-based activities provided to others.
Fees from commercial MSRs, residential MSRs and other loan servicing are reported on our Consolidated
Income Statement in the line items Corporate services, Residential mortgage, and Consumer services, respectively.
NOTE 10 CAPITAL SECURITIES OF
SUBSIDIARY TRUSTS AND PERPETUAL TRUST SECURITIES
Capital Securities of Subsidiary Trusts
Our capital securities of subsidiary trusts (Trusts) are described in Note 13 Capital Securities of Subsidiary Trusts and Perpetual Trust Securities in our 2011 Form 10-K. All of these Trusts
are wholly owned finance subsidiaries of PNC. In the event of certain changes or amendments to regulatory requirements or federal tax rules, the capital securities are redeemable. The financial statements of the Trusts are not included in PNCs
consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP.
Due to the April 25, 2012 redemption of trust preferred securities issued by
PNC Capital Trust D and the related junior subordinated note, effective April 25, 2012, the beneficiaries of the replacement capital covenant for PNC Capital Trust E described in Note 13 of our 2011 Form 10-K are the holders of our 6 7/8%
Subordinated Notes due May 15, 2019.
The obligations of the respective parent of each Trust, when taken collectively, are the equivalent
of a full and unconditional guarantee of the obligations of such Trust under the terms of the capital securities. Such guarantee is subordinate in right of payment in the same manner as other junior subordinated debt. There are certain restrictions
on PNCs overall ability to obtain funds from its subsidiaries. For additional disclosure on these funding restrictions, including an explanation of dividend and intercompany loan limitations, see Note 21 Regulatory Matters in our 2011 Form
10-K.
PNC is also subject to restrictions on dividends and other provisions potentially imposed under the Exchange Agreements with Trust II
and Trust III, as described in Note 13 in our 2011 Form 10-K in the Perpetual Trust Securities section, and to other provisions similar to or in some ways more restrictive than those potentially imposed under those agreements.
PERPETUAL TRUST SECURITIES
Our perpetual trust securities are described in Note 13 in our 2011 Form 10-K. Our 2011 Form 10-K also includes additional information regarding the Trust I and Trust II Securities, including descriptions
of replacement capital and dividend restriction covenants. The Trust III Securities include dividend restriction covenants similar to those described for Trust II Securities.
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 117
NOTE 11 CERTAIN EMPLOYEE BENEFIT
AND STOCK BASED COMPENSATION PLANS
PENSION AND POSTRETIREMENT PLANS
As described in Note 14 Employee Benefit Plans in our 2011 Form 10-K, we have a noncontributory, qualified defined benefit pension plan covering eligible
employees. Benefits are determined using a cash balance formula where earnings credits are a percentage of eligible compensation. Pension contributions are based on an actuarially determined amount necessary to fund total benefits payable to plan
participants.
We also maintain nonqualified supplemental retirement plans for certain employees and provide certain health care and life
insurance benefits for qualifying retired employees (postretirement benefits) through various plans. The nonqualified pension and postretirement benefit plans are unfunded. PNC reserves the right to terminate or make plan changes at any time.
PNC acquired RBC Bank (USA) during the first quarter of 2012. RBC employees will become eligible to participate in PNCs pension and
postretirement medical benefits upon attainment of certain criteria.
The components of our net periodic pension and post-retirement benefit
cost for the first three months of 2012 and 2011 were as follows:
Net Periodic Pension and Postretirement Benefits Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualified Pension Plan |
|
|
Nonqualified Retirement Plans |
|
|
Postretirement Benefits |
|
Three months ended March 31 In millions |
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Net periodic cost consists of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Amortization of actuarial losses |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Net periodic cost (benefit) |
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
STOCK BASED COMPENSATION PLANS
As more fully described in Note 15 Stock Based Compensation Plans in our 2011 Form 10-K, we have long-term incentive award plans
(Incentive Plans) that provide for the granting of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, incentive shares/performance units, restricted stock, restricted share units, other share-based awards and
dollar-denominated awards to executives and, other than incentive stock options, to non-employee directors. Certain Incentive Plan awards may be paid in stock, cash or a combination of stock and cash. We typically grant a substantial portion of our
stock-based compensation awards during the first quarter of the year. As of March 31, 2012, no stock appreciation rights were outstanding.
Total compensation expense recognized related to all share-based payment arrangements during the first three months of 2012 and 2011 was $31 million and
$30 million, respectively.
NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTIONS
Options are granted at exercise prices not less than the market value of common stock on the grant date. Generally, options become exercisable in
installments after the grant date. No option may be exercisable after 10 years from its grant date. Payment of the option exercise price may be in cash or by surrendering shares of common stock at market value on the exercise date. The exercise
price may be paid in previously owned shares.
For purposes of computing stock option expense, we estimated the fair value of stock options
primarily by using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Option pricing models require the use of numerous assumptions, many of which are very subjective.
Option Pricing Assumptions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average for the three months ended
March 31 |
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Volatility |
|
|
35.1 |
|
|
|
34.7 |
|
Expected life |
|
|
5.9 yrs. |
|
|
|
5.9 yrs. |
|
Grant-date fair value |
|
$ |
16.22 |
|
|
$ |
22.82 |
|
118 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
Stock Option Rollforward
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PNC |
|
|
PNC Options Converted From National City Options |
|
|
Total |
|
In thousands, except weighted-average data |
|
Shares |
|
|
Weighted- Average Exercise Price |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Weighted- Average Exercise Price |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Weighted- Average Exercise Price |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2011 |
|
|
17,490 |
|
|
$ |
54.48 |
|
|
|
949 |
|
|
$ |
684.40 |
|
|
|
18,439 |
|
|
$ |
86.90 |
|
Granted |
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
60.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
60.70 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(1,114 |
) |
|
|
49.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,114 |
) |
|
|
49.92 |
|
Cancelled |
|
|
(409 |
) |
|
|
61.77 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
390.97 |
|
|
|
(424 |
) |
|
|
73.84 |
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2012 |
|
|
16,428 |
|
|
$ |
54.78 |
|
|
|
934 |
|
|
$ |
689.29 |
|
|
|
17,362 |
|
|
$ |
88.90 |
|
Exercisable at March 31, 2012 |
|
|
13,303 |
|
|
$ |
53.23 |
|
|
|
934 |
|
|
$ |
689.29 |
|
|
|
14,237 |
|
|
$ |
94.94 |
|
During the first three months of 2012, we issued approximately 1.1 million shares from treasury stock
in connection with stock option exercise activity. As with past exercise activity, we currently intend to utilize treasury stock primarily for any future stock option exercises.
INCENTIVE/PERFORMANCE UNIT SHARE AWARDS AND RESTRICTED
STOCK/UNIT AWARDS
The fair value of nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and
restricted stock/unit awards is initially determined based on prices not less than the market value of our common stock price on the date of grant. The value of certain incentive/performance unit share awards is subsequently remeasured based on the
achievement of one or more financial and other performance goals over a three-year period. The Personnel and Compensation Committee (P&CC) of the Board of Directors approves the final award payout with respect to
incentive/performance unit share awards. Restricted stock/unit
awards have various vesting periods generally ranging from 36 months to 60 months.
Beginning in 2012, we incorporated several risk-related performance changes to certain incentive performance unit awards made under our long-term
incentive compensation programs. In addition to achieving certain financial performance metrics relative to our peers, the final payout amount will be subject to a negative adjustment if PNC fails to meet certain risk-related performance metrics as
specified in the award agreement. However, the P&CC has the discretion to reduce any or all of this negative adjustment under certain circumstances. These awards have a three-year performance period and are payable in either stock or a
combination of stock and cash. Additionally, performance-based restricted share units were granted in 2012 to certain of our executives in lieu of stock options, with generally the same terms and conditions as the 2011 awards of the same.
Nonvested Incentive/Performance
Unit Share Awards and Restricted Stock/Unit Awards Rollforward
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares in thousands |
|
Nonvested Incentive/ Performance Unit Shares |
|
|
Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value |
|
|
Nonvested Restricted Stock/ Unit Shares |
|
|
Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value |
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
|
830 |
|
|
$ |
61.68 |
|
|
|
2,512 |
|
|
$ |
54.87 |
|
Granted |
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
60.70 |
|
|
|
1,251 |
|
|
|
60.60 |
|
Vested/Released |
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
64.21 |
|
|
|
(767 |
) |
|
|
45.43 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
58.51 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
58.51 |
|
March 31, 2012 |
|
|
1,192 |
|
|
$ |
61.11 |
|
|
|
2,973 |
|
|
$ |
59.68 |
|
In the chart above, the unit shares and related weighted-average grant date fair value of the
incentive/performance awards exclude the effect of dividends on the underlying shares, as those dividends will be paid in cash.
At
March 31, 2012, there was $123 million of unrecognized deferred compensation expense related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Incentive Plans. This cost is expected to be recognized as expense over a period
of no longer than five years.
LIABILITY AWARDS
We granted cash-payable restricted share units to certain executives. The grants were made primarily as part of an annual bonus incentive deferral plan.
While there are time-based and service-related vesting criteria, there are no market or performance criteria associated with these awards. Compensation expense recognized related to these awards was recorded in prior periods as part of annual cash
bonus criteria. As of March 31, 2012, there were 823,002 of these cash-payable restricted share units outstanding.
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 119
A summary of all nonvested, cash-payable restricted share unit activity follows:
Nonvested Cash-Payable Restricted Share Unit Rollforward
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands |
|
Nonvested Cash-Payable Restricted Unit Shares |
|
|
Aggregate Intrinsic Value |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2011 |
|
|
1,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
543 |
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and Released |
|
|
(629 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2012 |
|
|
966 |
|
|
$ |
62,326 |
|
NOTE 12 FINANCIAL DERIVATIVES
We use derivative financial instruments (derivatives) primarily to help manage exposure to interest rate, market and credit risk and
reduce the effects that changes in interest rates may have on net income, fair value of assets and liabilities, and cash flows. We also enter into derivatives with customers to facilitate their risk management activities.
Derivatives represent contracts between parties that usually require little or no initial net investment and result in one party delivering cash or
another type of asset to the other party based on a notional amount and an underlying as specified in the contract. Derivative transactions are often measured in terms of notional amount, but this amount is generally not exchanged and it is not
recorded on the balance sheet. The notional amount is the basis to which the underlying is applied to determine required payments under the derivative contract. The underlying is a referenced interest rate (commonly LIBOR), security price, credit
spread or other index. Residential and commercial real estate loan commitments associated with loans to be sold also qualify as derivative instruments.
All derivatives are carried on our Consolidated Balance Sheet at fair value. Derivative balances are presented on a net basis taking into consideration the effects of legally enforceable master netting
agreements. Cash collateral exchanged with counterparties is also netted against the applicable derivative fair values.
Further discussion on
how derivatives are accounted for is included in Note 1 Accounting Policies in our 2011 Form 10-K.
Derivatives Designated in Hedge
Relationships
Certain derivatives used to manage interest rate risk as part of our asset and liability risk management activities are
designated as accounting hedges under GAAP. Derivatives hedging the risks associated with changes in the fair value of assets or liabilities are considered fair value hedges, derivatives hedging the variability of expected future cash flows are
considered cash flow hedges, and derivatives
hedging a net investment in a foreign subsidiary are considered net investment hedges. Designating derivatives as accounting hedges allows for gains and losses on those derivatives, to the extent
effective, to be recognized in the income statement in the same period the hedged items affect earnings.
Fair Value Hedges
We enter into receive-fixed, pay-variable interest rate swaps to hedge changes in the fair value of outstanding fixed-rate debt and
borrowings caused by fluctuations in market interest rates. The specific products hedged may include bank notes, Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings, and senior and subordinated debt. We also enter into pay-fixed, receive-variable interest rate swaps,
and zero-coupon swaps to hedge changes in the fair value of fixed rate and zero-coupon investment securities caused by fluctuations in market interest rates. The specific products hedged include US Treasury, government agency and other debt
securities. For these hedge relationships, we use statistical regression analysis to assess hedge effectiveness at both the inception of the hedge relationship and on an ongoing basis. There were no components of derivative gains or losses excluded
from the assessment of hedge effectiveness.
The ineffective portion of the change in value of our fair value hedge derivatives resulted in
net losses of $20 million for the first three months of 2012 compared with net losses of $7 million for the first three months of 2011.
Cash Flow Hedges
We enter into
receive-fixed, pay-variable interest rate swaps to modify the interest rate characteristics of designated commercial loans from variable to fixed in order to reduce the impact of changes in future cash flows due to market interest rate changes. For
these cash flow hedges, any changes in the fair value of the derivatives that are effective in offsetting changes in the forecasted interest cash flows are recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income and are reclassified to interest income in
conjunction with the recognition of interest receipts on the loans. In the 12 months that follow March 31, 2012, we expect to reclassify from the amount currently reported in Accumulated other comprehensive income net derivative gains of $357
million pretax, or $232 million after-tax, in association with interest receipts on the hedged loans. This amount could differ from amounts actually recognized due to changes in interest rates, hedge de-designations, and the addition of other hedges
subsequent to March 31, 2012. The maximum length of time over which forecasted loan cash flows are hedged is 9 years. We use statistical regression analysis to assess the effectiveness of these hedge relationships at both the inception of the
hedge relationship and on an ongoing basis.
We also periodically enter into forward purchase and sale contracts to hedge the variability of
the consideration that will be paid or received related to the purchase or sale of investment securities. The forecasted purchase or sale is
120 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
consummated upon gross settlement of the forward contract itself. As a result, hedge ineffectiveness, if any, is typically minimal. Gains and losses on these forward contracts are recorded in
Accumulated other comprehensive income and are recognized in earnings when the hedged cash flows affect earnings. In the 12 months that follow March 31, 2012, we expect to reclassify from the amount currently reported in Accumulated other
comprehensive loss, net derivative gains of $66 million pretax, or $43 million after-tax, as adjustments of yield on investment securities. The maximum length of time we are hedging forecasted purchases is four months. There were no amounts in
Accumulated other comprehensive income related to the forecasted sale of securities at March 31, 2012.
There were no components of
derivative gains or losses excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness related to either cash flow hedge strategy.
During the first
three months of 2012 and 2011, there were no gains or losses from cash flow hedge derivatives reclassified to earnings because it became probable that the original forecasted transaction would not occur. The amount of cash flow hedge ineffectiveness
recognized in income for the first three months of 2012 and 2011 was not material to PNCs results of operations.
Net Investment
Hedges
We enter into foreign currency forward contracts to hedge non-U.S. Dollar (USD) net investments in foreign subsidiaries
against adverse changes in foreign exchange rates. We assess whether the hedging relationship is highly effective in achieving offsetting changes in the value of the hedge and hedged item by qualitatively verifying that the critical terms of the
hedge and hedged item match at the inception of the hedging relationship and on an ongoing basis. There were no components of derivative gains or losses excluded from the assessment of the hedge effectiveness.
At March 31, 2012, there was no net investment hedge ineffectiveness.
Further detail regarding the notional amounts, fair values and gains and losses recognized related to derivatives used in fair value, cash flow, and net investment hedge strategies is presented in the
tables that follow.
DERIVATIVES NOT DESIGNATED IN HEDGE
RELATIONSHIPS
We also enter into derivatives that are not designated as accounting hedges under GAAP.
The majority of these derivatives are used to manage risk related to residential and commercial mortgage banking activities and are considered economic
hedges. Although these derivatives are used to hedge risk, they are not designated as accounting hedges because the contracts they are hedging are typically also carried at fair value on the balance sheet,
resulting in symmetrical accounting treatment for both the hedging instrument and the hedged item.
Our residential mortgage banking activities consist of originating, selling and servicing mortgage loans. Residential mortgage loans that will be sold in the secondary market, and the related loan
commitments, which are considered derivatives, are accounted for at fair value. Changes in the fair value of the loans and commitments due to interest rate risk are hedged with forward loan sale contracts as well as US Treasury and Eurodollar
futures and options. Gains and losses on the loans and commitments held for sale and the derivatives used to economically hedge them are included in Residential mortgage noninterest income on the Consolidated Income Statement.
We typically retain the servicing rights related to residential mortgage loans that we sell. Residential mortgage servicing rights are accounted for at
fair value with changes in fair value influenced primarily by changes in interest rates. Derivatives used to hedge the fair value of residential mortgage servicing rights include interest rate futures, swaps, options (including caps, floors, and
swaptions), and forward contracts to purchase mortgage-backed securities. Gains and losses on residential mortgage servicing rights and the related derivatives used for hedging are included in Residential mortgage noninterest income.
Certain commercial mortgage loans are also sold into the secondary market as part of our commercial mortgage banking activities and the loans, and the
related loan commitments, which are considered derivatives, are accounted for at fair value. Derivatives used to economically hedge these loans and commitments from changes in fair value due to interest rate risk and credit risk include forward loan
sale contracts, interest rate swaps, and credit default swaps. Gains and losses on the commitments, loans and derivatives are included in Other noninterest income.
The residential and commercial loan commitments associated with loans to be sold which are accounted for as derivatives are valued based on the estimated fair value of the underlying loan and the
probability that the loan will fund within the terms of the commitment. The fair value also takes into account the fair value of the embedded servicing right.
We offer derivatives to our customers in connection with their risk management needs. These derivatives primarily consist of interest rate swaps, interest rate caps, floors, swaptions, foreign exchange
contracts, and equity contracts. We primarily manage our market risk exposure from customer transactions by entering into a variety of hedging transactions with third-party dealers. Gains and losses on customer-related derivatives are included in
Other noninterest income.
The derivatives portfolio also includes derivatives used for other risk management activities. These derivatives
are entered into based on stated risk management objectives.
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 121
This segment of the portfolio includes credit default swaps (CDS) used to mitigate the risk of economic
loss on a portion of our loan exposure. We also sell loss protection to mitigate the net premium cost and the impact of mark-to-market accounting on CDS purchases to hedge the loan portfolio. The fair values of these derivatives typically are based
on related credit spreads. Gains and losses on the derivatives entered into for other risk management are included in Other noninterest income.
Included in the customer, mortgage banking risk management, and other risk management portfolios are written interest-rate caps and floors entered into
with customers and for risk management purposes. We receive an upfront premium from the counterparty and are obligated to make payments to the counterparty if the underlying market interest rate rises above or falls below a certain level designated
in the contract. The fair value of the written caps and floors liability on our Consolidated Balance Sheet was $6 million at both March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. Our ultimate obligation under written options is based on future market
conditions and is only quantifiable at settlement.
Further detail regarding the derivatives not designated in hedging relationships is
presented in the tables that follow.
DERIVATIVE COUNTERPARTY CREDIT RISK
By entering into derivative contracts we are exposed to credit risk. We seek to minimize credit risk through internal credit
approvals, limits, monitoring procedures, executing master netting agreements and collateral requirements. We generally enter into transactions with counterparties that carry high quality credit ratings. Nonperformance risk including credit risk is
included in the determination of the estimated net fair value.
We generally have established agreements with our major derivative dealer
counterparties that provide for exchanges of marketable securities or cash to collateralize either partys positions. At March 31, 2012, we held cash, US government securities and mortgage-backed securities totaling $1.2 billion under
these agreements. We pledged cash and US government securities of $845 million under these agreements. To the
extent not netted against derivative fair values under a master netting agreement, the receivable for cash pledged is included in Other assets and the obligation for cash held is included in
Other borrowed funds on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.
The credit risk associated with derivatives executed with customers is essentially
the same as that involved in extending loans and is subject to normal credit policies. We may obtain collateral based on our assessment of the customers credit quality.
We periodically enter into risk participation agreements to share some of the credit exposure with other counterparties related to interest rate derivative contracts or to take on credit exposure to
generate revenue. We will make/receive payments under these agreements if a customer defaults on its obligation to perform under certain derivative swap contracts. Risk participation agreements are included in the derivatives table that follows. Our
exposure related to risk participations where we sold protection is discussed in the Credit Derivatives section below.
CONTINGENT FEATURES
Some of PNCs derivative instruments contain provisions that require PNCs debt to maintain an investment grade credit rating from each of the major credit rating agencies. If PNCs debt
ratings were to fall below investment grade, it would be in violation of these provisions, and the counterparties to the derivative instruments could request immediate payment or demand immediate and ongoing full overnight collateralization on
derivative instruments in net liability positions.
The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent
features that were in a net liability position on March 31, 2012 was $983 million for which PNC had posted collateral of $831 million in the normal course of business. The maximum amount of collateral PNC would have been required to post if the
credit-risk-related contingent features underlying these agreements had been triggered on March 31, 2012, would be an additional $152 million.
122 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
Derivatives Total Notional or Contractual Amounts and Estimated Net Fair Values
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
March 31, 2012 |
|
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2012 |
|
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
In millions |
|
Notional/ Contract Amount |
|
|
Fair Value (a) |
|
|
Notional/ Contract Amount |
|
|
Fair Value (a) |
|
|
|
|
Notional/ Contract Amount |
|
|
Fair Value (b) |
|
|
Notional/ Contract Amount |
|
|
Fair Value (b) |
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under GAAP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow hedges |
|
$ |
14,190 |
|
|
$ |
499 |
|
|
$ |
16,542 |
|
|
$ |
572 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
175 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
93 |
|
|
$ |
116 |
|
Fair value hedges |
|
|
10,549 |
|
|
|
1,233 |
|
|
|
10,476 |
|
|
|
1,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,916 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
1,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment hedge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
609 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments |
|
$ |
24,739 |
|
|
$ |
1,732 |
|
|
$ |
27,018 |
|
|
$ |
1,888 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,700 |
|
|
$ |
118 |
|
|
$ |
2,216 |
|
|
$ |
116 |
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under GAAP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives used for residential mortgage banking activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage servicing Interest rate contracts |
|
$ |
126,934 |
|
|
$ |
3,143 |
|
|
$ |
122,395 |
|
|
$ |
3,390 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
77,756 |
|
|
$ |
2,609 |
|
|
$ |
63,226 |
|
|
$ |
2,854 |
|
Loan sales Interest rate contracts |
|
|
8,533 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
7,394 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
3,973 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
3,976 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Subtotal |
|
$ |
135,467 |
|
|
$ |
3,202 |
|
|
$ |
129,789 |
|
|
$ |
3,458 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
81,729 |
|
|
$ |
2,621 |
|
|
$ |
67,202 |
|
|
$ |
2,893 |
|
Derivatives used for commercial mortgage banking activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
$ |
1,580 |
|
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
$ |
1,476 |
|
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
867 |
|
|
$ |
84 |
|
|
$ |
1,149 |
|
|
$ |
80 |
|
Credit contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit default swaps |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
$ |
1,675 |
|
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
$ |
1,571 |
|
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
867 |
|
|
$ |
84 |
|
|
$ |
1,149 |
|
|
$ |
80 |
|
Derivatives used for customer-related activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
$ |
64,623 |
|
|
$ |
3,532 |
|
|
$ |
73,751 |
|
|
$ |
3,804 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
68,703 |
|
|
$ |
3,644 |
|
|
$ |
68,981 |
|
|
$ |
3,943 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
7,058 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
6,088 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
|
|
6,315 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
5,832 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
Equity contracts |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Credit contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk participation agreements |
|
|
1,874 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1,691 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,588 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1,568 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Subtotal |
|
$ |
73,675 |
|
|
$ |
3,684 |
|
|
$ |
81,648 |
|
|
$ |
4,046 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
76,666 |
|
|
$ |
3,791 |
|
|
$ |
76,447 |
|
|
$ |
4,178 |
|
Derivatives used for other risk management activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
$ |
2,970 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
2,190 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,754 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
1,479 |
|
|
$ |
39 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Equity contracts |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit default swaps |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other contracts (c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
Subtotal |
|
$ |
3,039 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
2,399 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,196 |
|
|
$ |
347 |
|
|
$ |
1,890 |
|
|
$ |
339 |
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments |
|
$ |
213,856 |
|
|
$ |
6,971 |
|
|
$ |
215,407 |
|
|
$ |
7,575 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
161,458 |
|
|
$ |
6,843 |
|
|
$ |
146,688 |
|
|
$ |
7,490 |
|
Total Gross Derivatives |
|
$ |
238,595 |
|
|
$ |
8,703 |
|
|
$ |
242,425 |
|
|
$ |
9,463 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
165,158 |
|
|
$ |
6,961 |
|
|
$ |
148,904 |
|
|
$ |
7,606 |
|
Less: Legally enforceable master netting agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,052 |
|
Less: Cash collateral |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
843 |
|
Total Net Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
711 |
|
(a) |
Included in Other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. |
(b) |
Included in Other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. |
(c) |
Includes PNCs obligation to fund a portion of certain BlackRock LTIP programs and other contracts. |
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 123
Gains (losses) on derivative instruments and related hedged items follow:
Derivatives Designated in GAAP Hedge Relationships Fair Value Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2012 |
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
Three months ended In millions |
|
Hedged Items |
|
Hedged Items Location |
|
Gain (Loss)
on Derivatives Recognized in Income |
|
|
Gain (Loss) on
Related Hedged Items Recognized in Income |
|
|
Gain (Loss)
on Derivatives Recognized in Income |
|
|
Gain (Loss) on Related Hedged Items Recognized in Income |
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amount |
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
US Treasury and Government Agencies Securities |
|
Investment securities (interest income) |
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
(24 |
) |
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
(14 |
) |
Interest rate contracts |
|
Other Debt Securities |
|
Investment securities (interest income) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Interest rate contracts |
|
Subordinated debt |
|
Borrowed funds (interest expense) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
51 |
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
Bank notes and senior debt |
|
Borrowed funds (interest expense) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
50 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(70 |
) |
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
(90 |
) |
|
$ |
83 |
|
Derivatives Designated in GAAP Hedge Relationships Cash Flow Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
In millions |
|
Gain (Loss) on Derivatives Recognized in OCI (Effective
Portion) |
|
|
Gain Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective
Portion) |
|
|
Gain Recognized
in Income on Derivatives (Ineffective Portion) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location |
|
Amount |
|
|
Location |
|
Amount |
|
March 31, 2012 Interest rate contracts |
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
116 |
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 Interest rate contracts |
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
88 |
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives Designated in GAAP Hedge Relationships Net Investment Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended In millions |
|
|
|
Gain (Loss) on Derivatives Recognized in OCI (Effective
Portion) |
|
March 31, 2012 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
$ |
12 |
|
124 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
Gains (losses) on derivative instruments not designated in hedge relationships:
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments under GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
In millions |
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Derivatives used for residential mortgage banking activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage servicing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
$ |
83 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
Loan sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Gains (losses) included in residential mortgage banking activities (a) |
|
$ |
105 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
Derivatives used for commercial mortgage banking activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
Credit contracts |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
Gains (losses) from commercial mortgage banking activities (b) |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
Derivatives used for customer-related activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Equity contracts |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Credit contracts |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gains (losses) from customer-related activities (b) |
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
Derivatives used for other risk management activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Credit contracts |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Other contracts (c) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
Gains (losses) from other risk management activities (b) |
|
$ |
(54 |
) |
|
$ |
(52 |
) |
Total gains (losses) from derivatives not designated as hedging
instruments |
|
$ |
102 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
(a) |
Included in residential mortgage noninterest income. |
(b) |
Included in other noninterest income. |
(c) |
Relates to BlackRock LTIP and other contracts. |
CREDIT DERIVATIVES
The credit derivative underlying is based on the credit risk of a specific entity, entities, or an index. As discussed above, we enter into credit derivatives, specifically credit default swaps and risk
participation agreements, as part of our commercial mortgage banking hedging activities and for customer and other risk management purposes. Detail regarding credit default swaps and risk participations sold follows:
Credit Default Swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
March 31, 2012 |
|
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
Dollars in millions |
|
Notional Amount |
|
|
Estimated Net Fair Value |
|
|
Weighted-Average Remaining Maturity In Years |
|
|
Notional Amount |
|
|
Estimated Net Fair Value |
|
|
Weighted-Average Remaining Maturity In Years |
|
Credit Default Swaps Sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single name |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
Index traded |
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
Credit Default Swaps Purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single name |
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
$ |
150 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
Index traded |
|
|
60 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
36.9 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
37.2 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
160 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
$ |
210 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
209 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
$ |
304 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 125
The notional amount of these credit default swaps by credit rating follows:
Credit Ratings of Credit Default Swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars in millions |
|
March 31 2012 |
|
|
December 31 2011 |
|
Credit Default Swaps Sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment grade (a) |
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
$ |
84 |
|
Subinvestment grade (b) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
Credit Default Swaps Purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment grade (a) |
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
$ |
145 |
|
Subinvestment grade (b) |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
160 |
|
|
$ |
210 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
209 |
|
|
$ |
304 |
|
(a) |
Investment grade with a rating of BBB-/Baa3 or above based on published rating agency information. |
(b) |
Subinvestment grade with a rating below BBB-/Baa3 based on published rating agency information. |
The referenced/underlying assets for these credit default swaps follow:
Referenced/Underlying Assets of Credit Default Swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Debt |
|
|
Commercial mortgage- backed securities |
|
|
Loans |
|
March 31, 2012 |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
31 |
% |
December 31, 2011 |
|
|
59 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
We enter into credit default swaps under which we buy loss protection from or sell loss protection to a counterparty for
the occurrence of a credit event related to a referenced entity or index. The maximum amount we would be required to pay under the credit default swaps in which we sold protection, assuming all referenced underlyings experience a credit event at a
total loss, without recoveries, was $49 million at March 31, 2012 and $94 million at December 31, 2011.
Risk Participation Agreements
We have sold risk participation agreements with terms ranging from less than 1 year to 25 years. We will be required to make payments under these agreements if a customer defaults on its obligation to
perform under certain derivative swap contracts with third parties.
Risk Participation Agreements Sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars in millions |
|
Notional Amount |
|
|
Estimated Net Fair Value |
|
|
Weighted-Average Remaining Maturity In Years |
|
March 31, 2012 |
|
$ |
1,588 |
|
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
|
7.4 |
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
1,568 |
|
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
|
7.5 |
|
Based on our internal risk rating process of the underlying third parties to the swap contracts, the percentages of the
exposure amount of risk participation agreements sold by internal credit rating follow:
Internal Credit Ratings of Risk Participation
Agreements Sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2012 |
|
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
Pass (a) |
|
|
99 |
% |
|
|
99 |
% |
Below pass (b) |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
(a) |
Indicates the expected risk of default is currently low. |
(b) |
Indicates a higher degree of risk of default. |
Assuming all underlying swap counterparties defaulted at March 31, 2012, the exposure from these agreements would be $129 million based on the fair
value of the underlying swaps, compared with $145 million at December 31, 2011.
126 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
NOTE 13 EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic and Diluted Earnings per Common Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 In millions, except per share data |
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
811 |
|
|
$ |
832 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Dividends distributed to common shareholders |
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
Dividends distributed to preferred shareholders |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Dividends distributed to nonvested restricted shares |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock discount accretion |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed net income |
|
$ |
580 |
|
|
$ |
781 |
|
Percentage of undistributed income allocated to common shares (a) |
|
|
99.65 |
% |
|
|
99.68 |
% |
Undistributed income allocated to common shares |
|
$ |
578 |
|
|
$ |
779 |
|
Plus: common dividends |
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
Net income attributable to basic common shares |
|
$ |
762 |
|
|
$ |
831 |
|
Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
524 |
|
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
1.45 |
|
|
$ |
1.59 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to basic common shares |
|
$ |
762 |
|
|
$ |
831 |
|
Less: BlackRock common stock equivalents |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Net income attributable to diluted common shares |
|
$ |
759 |
|
|
$ |
826 |
|
Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
524 |
|
Dilutive potential common shares (b) (c) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
526 |
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
1.44 |
|
|
$ |
1.57 |
|
(a) Excludes unvested shares issued for Restricted Stock plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Excludes stock options considered to be anti-dilutive |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
(c) Excludes warrants considered to be anti-dilutive |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 127
NOTE 14 TOTAL EQUITY AND OTHER
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Activity in total equity for the first three months of 2011 and 2012 follows.
Rollforward of Total Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity |
|
In millions |
|
Shares Outstanding Common Stock |
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Capital Surplus Preferred Stock |
|
|
Capital Surplus Common Stock and Other |
|
|
Retained Earnings |
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
Non- controlling Interests |
|
|
Total Equity |
|
Balance at January 1, 2011 |
|
|
526 |
|
|
$ |
2,682 |
|
|
$ |
647 |
|
|
$ |
12,057 |
|
|
$ |
15,859 |
|
|
$ |
(431 |
) |
|
$ |
(572 |
) |
|
$ |
2,596 |
|
|
$ |
32,838 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
832 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122 |
|
Cash dividends declared |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common ($.10 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
Preferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Preferred stock discount accretion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock activity (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Treasury stock activity (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
Balance at March 31, 2011 (b) |
|
|
526 |
|
|
$ |
2,682 |
|
|
$ |
647 |
|
|
$ |
12,056 |
|
|
$ |
16,640 |
|
|
$ |
(309 |
) |
|
$ |
(584 |
) |
|
$ |
2,585 |
|
|
$ |
33,717 |
|
Balance at January 1, 2012 |
|
|
527 |
|
|
$ |
2,683 |
|
|
$ |
1,637 |
|
|
$ |
12,072 |
|
|
$ |
18,253 |
|
|
$ |
(105 |
) |
|
$ |
(487 |
) |
|
$ |
3,193 |
|
|
$ |
37,246 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
811 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
386 |
|
Cash dividends declared |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common ($.35 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(185 |
) |
Preferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
Preferred stock discount accretion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock activity |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
Balance at March 31, 2012 (b) |
|
|
528 |
|
|
$ |
2,685 |
|
|
$ |
1,638 |
|
|
$ |
12,074 |
|
|
$ |
18,834 |
|
|
$ |
281 |
|
|
$ |
(467 |
) |
|
$ |
3,191 |
|
|
$ |
38,236 |
|
(a) |
Common and net treasury stock activity totaled less than .5 million shares. |
(b) |
The par value of our preferred stock outstanding was less than $.5 million at each date and , therefore, is excluded from this presentation. |
128 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
Other Comprehensive Income
Details of other comprehensive income (loss) are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax |
|
|
Tax |
|
|
After-tax |
|
Net unrealized securities gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
95 |
|
2011 activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in net unrealized gains for non-OTTI securities |
|
$ |
65 |
|
|
$ |
(24 |
) |
|
|
41 |
|
Less: net gains realized in net income |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
24 |
|
Net unrealized gains on non-OTTI securities |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
17 |
|
Balance at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
112 |
|
Balance at December 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
696 |
|
2012 activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in net unrealized gains for non-OTTI securities |
|
$ |
301 |
|
|
$ |
(111 |
) |
|
|
190 |
|
Less: net gains realized in net income |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
40 |
|
Net unrealized gains on non-OTTI securities |
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
150 |
|
Balance at March 31, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
846 |
|
Net OTTI losses on debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(646 |
) |
2011 activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in OTTI losses on debt securities |
|
$ |
197 |
|
|
$ |
(72 |
) |
|
|
125 |
|
Less: Net OTTI losses realized in net income |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
Net unrealized gains (losses) on OTTI securities |
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
147 |
|
Balance at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(499 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(738 |
) |
2012 activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in OTTI losses on debt securities |
|
$ |
362 |
|
|
$ |
(133 |
) |
|
|
229 |
|
Less: Net losses realized on sales of securities |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Less: Net OTTI losses realized in net income |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
Net unrealized gains (losses) on OTTI securities |
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
257 |
|
Balance at March 31, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(481 |
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax |
|
|
Tax |
|
|
After-tax |
|
Net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedge derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
522 |
|
2011 activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in net unrealized gains on cash flow hedge derivatives |
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
Less: net gains realized in net income |
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
77 |
|
Net unrealized gains on cash flow hedge derivatives |
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
(68 |
) |
Balance at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
454 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
717 |
|
2012 activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in net unrealized gains on cash flow hedge derivatives |
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
$ |
(19 |
) |
|
|
34 |
|
Less: net gains realized in net income |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
91 |
|
Net unrealized gains on cash flow hedge derivatives |
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
Balance at March 31, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
660 |
|
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax |
|
|
Tax |
|
|
After-tax |
|
Pension and other postretirement benefit plan adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(380 |
) |
2011 Activity |
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
Balance at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(370 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(755 |
) |
2012 Activity |
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
|
|
31 |
|
Balance at March 31, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(724 |
) |
Other (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(22 |
) |
2011 Activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adj. |
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
|
|
16 |
|
Total 2011 activity |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
16 |
|
Balance at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(25 |
) |
2012 Activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adj. |
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
BlackRock deferred tax adj. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Total 2012 activity |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
Balance at March 31, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(20 |
) |
(a) |
Consists of foreign currency translation adjustments and deferred tax adjustments on BlackRocks other comprehensive income in 2012. |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Components
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2012 |
|
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
In millions |
|
Pretax |
|
|
After-tax |
|
|
Pretax |
|
|
After-tax |
|
Net unrealized securities gains |
|
$ |
1,336 |
|
|
$ |
846 |
|
|
$ |
1,098 |
|
|
$ |
696 |
|
OTTI losses on debt securities |
|
|
(760 |
) |
|
|
(481 |
) |
|
|
(1,166 |
) |
|
|
(738 |
) |
Net unrealized gains on cash flow hedge derivatives |
|
|
1,041 |
|
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
1,131 |
|
|
|
717 |
|
Pension and other postretirement benefit plan adjustments |
|
|
(1,143 |
) |
|
|
(724 |
) |
|
|
(1,191 |
) |
|
|
(755 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
435 |
|
|
$ |
281 |
|
|
$ |
(179 |
) |
|
$ |
(105 |
) |
NOTE 15 INCOME TAXES
The net operating loss carryforwards at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 follow:
Net Operating Loss Carryforwards and Tax Credit Carryforwards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
March 31, 2012 |
|
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
Net Operating Loss Carryforwards: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
1,668 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
State |
|
|
2,693 |
|
|
|
1,460 |
|
Valuation allowance State |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Tax Credit Carryforwards: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
$ |
112 |
|
State |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
The federal net operating loss carryforwards expire from 2027 to 2028. The state net operating loss carryforwards will
expire from 2012 to 2031. The majority of the tax credit carryforwards expire in 2031. The large increases in the net operating loss carryforwards are primarily attributable to the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition.
Examinations are complete for PNCs consolidated federal income tax returns through 2006 having no outstanding unresolved issues. The Internal
Revenue Service (IRS) is currently examining PNCs 2007 and 2008 returns. National Citys consolidated federal income tax returns through 2007 have been audited by the IRS. Certain adjustments remain under review by the IRS Appeals
division for years 2003 through 2007. The IRS is currently examining National Citys 2008 return. PNC also continues to be under examination with several state taxing authorities.
We had unrecognized tax benefits of $220 million at March 31, 2012 and $209 million at December 31, 2011. At March 31, 2012, $107 million of unrecognized tax benefits, if recognized, would
favorably impact the effective income tax rate.
It is reasonably possible that the liability for unrecognized tax benefits could increase or
decrease in the next twelve months due to completion of tax authorities exams or the expiration of statutes of limitations. Management estimates that the liability for unrecognized tax benefits could decrease by $83 million within the next
twelve months.
130 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
NOTE 16 LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We establish accruals for legal proceedings, including litigation and regulatory and governmental investigations and inquiries, when
information related to the loss contingencies represented by those matters indicates both that a loss is probable and that the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. Any such accruals are adjusted thereafter as appropriate to reflect changed
circumstances. When we are able to do so, we also determine estimates of possible losses or ranges of possible losses, whether in excess of any related accrued liability or where there is no accrued liability, for disclosed legal proceedings
(Disclosed Matters, which are those matters disclosed in this Note 16 and also those matters disclosed in Note 22 Legal Proceedings in Part II, Item 8 of our 2011 Form 10-K (such prior disclosure referred to as Prior
Disclosure) that are still pending). For Disclosed Matters where we are able to estimate such possible losses or ranges of possible losses, as of March 31, 2012, we estimate that it is reasonably possible that we could incur losses in an
aggregate amount of up to approximately $550 million. The estimates included in this amount are based on our analysis of currently available information and are subject to significant judgment and a variety of assumptions and uncertainties. As new
information is obtained we may change our estimates. Due to the inherent subjectivity of the assessments and unpredictability of outcomes of legal proceedings, any amounts accrued or included in this aggregate amount may not represent the ultimate
loss to us from the legal proceedings in question. Thus, our exposure and ultimate losses may be higher, and possibly significantly so, than the amounts accrued or this aggregate amount.
The aggregate estimated amount provided above does not include an estimate for every Disclosed Matter, as we are unable, at this time, to estimate the losses that it is reasonably possible that we could
incur or ranges of such losses with respect to some of the matters disclosed for one or more of the following reasons. In our experience, legal proceedings are inherently unpredictable. In many legal proceedings, various factors exacerbate this
inherent unpredictability, including, among others, one or more of the following: the proceeding is in its early stages; the damages sought are unspecified, unsupported or uncertain; it is unclear whether a case brought as a class action will be
allowed to proceed on that basis or, if permitted to proceed as a class action, how the class will be defined; the plaintiff is seeking relief other than or in addition to compensatory damages; the matter presents meaningful legal uncertainties,
including novel issues of law; we have not engaged in meaningful settlement discussions; discovery has not started or is not complete; there are significant facts in dispute; and there are a large number of parties named as defendants (including
where it is uncertain how liability, if any, will be shared among multiple defendants). Generally, the less progress that has been made in the proceedings or the broader the range of potential results, the harder it is for us to estimate losses or
ranges of losses that it is reasonably
possible we could incur. Therefore, as the estimated aggregate amount disclosed above does not include all of the Disclosed Matters, the amount disclosed above does not represent our maximum
reasonably possible loss exposure for all of the Disclosed Matters. The estimated aggregate amount also does not reflect any of our exposure to matters not so disclosed, as discussed below under Other.
We include in some of the descriptions of individual Disclosed Matters certain quantitative information related to the plaintiffs claim against us
alleged in the plaintiffs pleadings or otherwise publicly available. While information of this type may provide insight into the potential magnitude of a matter, it does not necessarily represent our estimate of reasonably possible loss or our
judgment as to any currently appropriate accrual.
Some of our exposure in Disclosed Matters may be offset by applicable insurance coverage.
We do not consider the possible availability of insurance coverage in determining the amounts of any accruals (although we record the amount of related insurance recoveries that are deemed probable up to the amount of the accrual) or in determining
any estimates of possible losses or ranges of possible losses.
SECURITIES AND
STATE LAW FIDUCIARY CASES AGAINST NATIONAL CITY
|
|
|
In January 2008, a lawsuit (In re National City Corporation Securities, Derivative & ERISA Litigation (The Securities Case) (MDL
No. 2003, Case No: 1:08-nc-70004-SO)) was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio against National City and certain officers and directors of National City. As amended, this lawsuit was brought as a class
action on behalf of purchasers of National Citys stock during the period April 30, 2007 to April 21, 2008 and also on behalf of everyone who acquired National City stock pursuant to a registration statement filed in connection with
its acquisition of MAF Bancorp in 2007. The amended complaint alleged violations of federal securities laws regarding public statements and disclosures relating to, among other things, the nature, quality, performance, and risks of National
Citys non-prime, residential construction, and National Home Equity portfolios, its loan loss reserves, its financial condition, and related allegedly false and misleading financial statements. In the amended complaint, the plaintiffs sought,
among other things, unspecified damages and attorneys fees. In August 2011, the parties entered into a memorandum of understanding providing for the settlement of the lawsuit for $168 million and in November filed formal settlement papers with
the district court. In March 2012, the court granted final approval of the settlement. The expected financial impact of this settlement has been fully accrued.
|
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 131
Overdraft Litigation
As a result of the acquisition of RBC Bank (USA), we are subject to two additional pending lawsuits brought as class actions relating to the manner in which overdraft fees were charged on ATM and debit
transactions to customers and related matters. Together with other similar lawsuits pending against PNC Bank, National City Bank and other banks, these lawsuits have been consolidated for pre-trial proceedings in the United States District Court for
the Southern District of Florida (the MDL Court) under the caption In re Checking Account Overdraft Litigation (MDL No. 2036, Case No. 1:09-MD-02036-JLK ). One of these cases (Dasher v. RBC Bank (10-cv-22190-JLK))
was filed in July 2010 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The other case (Avery v. RBC Bank (Case No. 1-cv-329)) was originally filed in North Carolina state court in July 2010 and was removed to
the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina before being transferred to the MDL Court. An amended complaint was filed in Avery in August 2010.
The customer agreements with the RBC Bank (USA) plaintiffs contain arbitration provisions. RBC Bank (USA)s original motion in Dasher to compel arbitration under these provisions was denied by
the MDL Court. This denial was appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. While this appeal was pending, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion, following which the
court of appeals vacated the MDL Courts denial of the arbitration motion and remanded to the MDL Court for further consideration in light of the Concepcion decision. RBC Bank (USA) has renewed its motion to compel arbitration, now
covering both Dasher and Avery. This motion is still pending.
The complaints in these cases generally make the same allegations
as made in the other cases against PNC Bank and National City Bank pending in the MDL Court, as described in Prior Disclosure, except that the state consumer protection statutory claims relate to the North Carolina statute and the Avery
complaint does not make claims for breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing or for conversion. These cases seek to certify multi-state classes of customers for the common law claims described in Prior Disclosure (covering all states
in which RBC Bank (USA) had retail branch operations during the class period), and subclasses of RBC Bank (USA) customers with accounts in North Carolina branches, with the subclass being asserted for purposes of claims under that states
consumer protection statute. No class periods are stated in either of the complaints, other than for the applicable statutes of limitations, which vary by state and claim.
In their complaints, the plaintiffs in Dasher and Avery seek substantially similar relief to that described in Prior Disclosure with respect to the other cases pending in the MDL Court.
Weavering Macro Fixed Income Fund
In March 2012, the plaintiff in the lawsuit pending in the High Court, Dublin, Ireland against a European subsidiary of PNC Global Investment Servicing (sold to Bank of New York Mellon Corporation in July
2010) appealed the judgment of the court ordering a hearing on certain preliminary issues (a modular trial) to the Supreme Court of Ireland.
365/360 Litigation
In PNC Bank, National Association v. St. Louis PET Centers,
LLC, et al. (Case no. 10SL-CC01076), pending in the Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis, Missouri, the borrower dismissed its counterclaim against PNC Bank without prejudice in April 2012.
False Claims Act Lawsuit
PNC
Bank has reached an agreement in principle with the plaintiffs to settle United States ex rel. Bibby & Donnelly v. Wells Fargo, et al. (1:06-CV-0547-AT), pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. This
settlement is subject to, among other things, final documentation and the consent of the United States. The amount of the settlement is not material to PNC.
Captive Mortgage Reinsurance Litigation
In White, et al. v. The
PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., et al. (Civil Action No. 11-7928)), pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the court granted a stay of proceedings in March 2012 pending the decision
of the United States Supreme Court in First American Financial Corporation v. Edwards, which could address issues related to the standing of plaintiffs to pursue their claims.
Other Regulatory and Governmental Inquiries
PNC is the subject of investigations, audits and other forms of regulatory and governmental inquiry covering a broad range of issues in our banking, securities and other financial services businesses, in
some cases as part of reviews of specified activities at multiple industry participants. Over the last few years, we have experienced an increase in regulatory and governmental investigations, audits and other inquiries. Areas of current regulatory
or governmental inquiry with respect to PNC include consumer financial protection, fair lending, mortgage origination and servicing, mortgage-related insurance and reinsurance, municipal finance activities, and participation in government insurance
or guarantee programs, some of which are described in Prior Disclosure. These inquiries, including those described in Prior Disclosure, may lead to administrative, civil or criminal proceedings, and possibly result in remedies including fines,
penalties, restitution, alterations in our business practices, and in additional expenses and collateral costs. Our practice is to cooperate fully with regulatory and governmental investigations, audits and other inquiries, including those described
in this paragraph or in Prior Disclosure.
132 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
Other
In addition to the proceedings or other matters described above and in Prior Disclosure, PNC and persons to whom we may have indemnification obligations, in the normal course of business, are subject to
various other pending and threatened legal proceedings in which claims for monetary damages and other relief are asserted. We do not anticipate, at the present time, that the ultimate aggregate liability, if any, arising out of such other legal
proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our financial position. However, we cannot now determine whether or not any claims asserted against us or others to whom we may have indemnification obligations, whether in the proceedings or other
matters described above or in Prior Disclosure or in other legal proceedings, will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in any future reporting period, which will depend on, among other things, the amount of the loss resulting
from the claim and the amount of income otherwise reported for the reporting period.
***
See Note 17 Commitments and Guarantees for additional information regarding the Visa indemnification and our other obligations to provide indemnification,
including to current and former officers, directors, employees and agents of PNC and companies we have acquired, including National City.
NOTE 17 COMMITMENTS AND GUARANTEES
Equity Funding and Other Commitments
Our unfunded commitments at March 31, 2012 included private equity investments of $234 million, and other investments of $4 million.
Standby Letters of Credit
We issue standby letters of credit and have risk
participations in standby letters of credit and bankers acceptances issued by other financial institutions, in each case to support obligations of our customers to third parties, such as remarketing programs for customers variable rate
demand notes. Net outstanding standby letters of credit and internal credit ratings were as follows:
Net Outstanding Standby Letters of
Credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars in billions |
|
March 31 2012 |
|
|
December 31 2011 |
|
Net outstanding standby letters of credit |
|
$ |
10.9 |
|
|
$ |
10.8 |
|
Internal credit ratings (as a percentage of portfolio): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass (a) |
|
|
94 |
% |
|
|
94 |
% |
Below pass (b) |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
(a) |
Indicates that expected risk of loss is currently low. |
(b) |
Indicates a higher degree of risk of default. |
If the customer fails to meet its financial or performance obligation to the third party under the terms of the contract or there is a need to support a
remarketing program, then upon the request of the guaranteed party, we would be obligated to make payment to them. The standby letters of credit and risk
participations in standby letters of credit and bankers acceptances outstanding on March 31, 2012 had terms ranging from less than 1 year to 7 years. The aggregate maximum amount of
future payments PNC could be required to make under outstanding standby letters of credit and risk participations in standby letters of credit and bankers acceptances was $14.3 billion at March 31, 2012, of which $7.1 billion support
remarketing programs.
As of March 31, 2012, assets of $1.7 billion secured certain specifically identified standby letters of credit.
Recourse provisions from third parties of $3.4 billion were also available for this purpose as of March 31, 2012. In addition, a portion of the remaining standby letters of credit and letter of credit risk participations issued on behalf of
specific customers is also secured by collateral or guarantees that secure the customers other obligations to us. The carrying amount of the liability for our obligations related to standby letters of credit and risk participations in standby
letters of credit and bankers acceptances was $248 million at March 31, 2012.
Standby Bond Purchase Agreements and Other
Liquidity Facilities
We enter into standby bond purchase agreements to support municipal bond obligations. At March 31, 2012, the
aggregate of our commitments under these facilities was $705 million. We also enter into certain other liquidity facilities to support individual pools of receivables acquired by commercial paper conduits. At March 31, 2012, our total
commitments under these facilities were $199 million.
Indemnifications
As further described in our 2011 Form 10-K, we are a party to numerous acquisition or divestiture agreements under which we have purchased or sold, or agreed to purchase or sell, various types of assets.
These agreements generally include indemnification provisions under which we indemnify the third parties to these agreements against a variety of risks to the indemnified parties as a result of the transaction in question. When PNC is the seller,
the indemnification provisions will generally also provide the buyer with protection relating to the quality of the assets we are selling and the extent of any liabilities being assumed by the buyer. Due to the nature of these indemnification
provisions, we cannot quantify the total potential exposure to us resulting from them.
We provide indemnification in connection with
securities offering transactions in which we are involved. When we are the issuer of the securities, we provide indemnification to the underwriters or placement agents analogous to the indemnification provided to the purchasers of businesses from
us, as described above. When we are an underwriter or placement agent, we provide a limited indemnification to the issuer related to our actions in connection with the offering
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 133
and, if there are other underwriters, indemnification to the other underwriters intended to result in an appropriate sharing of the risk of participating in the offering. Due to the nature of
these indemnification provisions, we cannot quantify the total potential exposure to us resulting from them.
In the ordinary course of
business, we enter into certain types of agreements that include provisions for indemnifying third parties. We also enter into certain types of agreements, including leases, assignments of leases, and subleases, in which we agree to indemnify third
parties for acts by our agents, assignees and/or sublessees, and employees. We also enter into contracts for the delivery of technology service in which we indemnify the other party against claims of patent and copyright infringement by third
parties. Due to the nature of these indemnification provisions, we cannot calculate our aggregate potential exposure under them.
We engage in
certain insurance activities that require our employees to be bonded. We satisfy this bonding requirement by issuing letters of credit, which were insignificant in amount at March 31, 2012.
In the ordinary course of business, we enter into contracts with third parties under which the third parties provide services on behalf of PNC. In many
of these contracts, we agree to indemnify the third party service provider under certain circumstances. The terms of the indemnity vary from contract to contract and the amount of the indemnification liability, if any, cannot be determined.
We are a general or limited partner in certain asset management and investment limited partnerships, many of which contain indemnification
provisions that would require us to make payments in excess of our remaining unfunded commitments. While in certain of these partnerships the maximum liability to us is limited to the sum of our unfunded commitments and partnership distributions
received by us, in the others the indemnification liability is unlimited. As a result, we cannot determine our aggregate potential exposure for these indemnifications.
In some cases, indemnification obligations of the types described above arise under arrangements entered into by predecessor companies for which we become responsible as a result of the acquisition.
Pursuant to their bylaws, PNC and its subsidiaries provide indemnification to directors, officers and, in some cases, employees and agents
against certain liabilities incurred as a result of their service on behalf of or at the request of PNC and its subsidiaries. PNC and its subsidiaries also advance on behalf of covered individuals costs incurred in connection with certain claims or
proceedings, subject to written undertakings by each such individual to repay all amounts advanced if it is ultimately determined that the individual is not entitled to indemnification. We generally are responsible
for similar indemnifications and advancement obligations that companies we acquire had to their officers, directors and sometimes employees and agents at the time of acquisition. We advanced such
costs on behalf of several such individuals with respect to pending litigation or investigations during the first three months of 2012. It is not possible for us to determine the aggregate potential exposure resulting from the obligation to provide
this indemnity or to advance such costs.
In connection with the sale of PNC Global Investment Servicing Inc. (GIS), and in addition to
indemnification provisions as part of the divestiture agreements, PNC agreed to continue to act for the benefit of GIS as securities lending agent for certain of GISs clients. In such role, we provided indemnification to those clients against
the failure of the borrowers to return the securities. The market value of the securities lent was fully secured on a daily basis; therefore, the exposure to us was limited to temporary shortfalls in the collateral as a result of short-term
fluctuations in trading prices of the loaned securities. In addition, the purchaser of GIS, BNY-Mellon, has entered into an agreement to indemnify PNC with respect to such exposure on the terms set forth in such indemnification agreement. Effective
July 18, 2011, PNC Bank, National Association assigned its securities lending agent responsibilities to BNY-Mellon and no longer acts as securities lending agent for any of GISs clients. Also in connection with the GIS divestiture, PNC
has agreed to indemnify the buyer generally as described above.
VISA Indemnification
Our payment services business issues and acquires credit and debit card transactions through Visa U.S.A. Inc. card association or its affiliates (Visa).
Our 2011 Form 10-K has additional information regarding the October 2007 Visa restructuring, our involvement with judgment and loss sharing agreements with Visa and certain other banks, the status of pending interchange litigation and other 2011
developments in this area.
As of March 31, 2012, our recognized Visa indemnification liability was zero. As we continue to have an
obligation to indemnify Visa for judgments and settlements for the remaining specified litigation, we may have additional exposure to the specified Visa litigation.
Recourse and Repurchase Obligations
As discussed in Note 3 Loans Sale and Servicing
Activities and Variable Interest Entities, PNC has sold commercial mortgage and residential mortgage loans directly or indirectly in securitizations and whole-loan sale transactions with continuing involvement. One form of continuing involvement
includes certain recourse and loan repurchase obligations associated with the transferred assets in these transactions.
Commercial
Mortgage Loan Recourse Obligations
We originate, close and service certain multi-family commercial mortgage loans which are sold to FNMA
under FNMAs DUS program. We participated in a similar program with the FHLMC.
134 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
Under these programs, we generally assume up to a one-third pari passu risk of loss on unpaid principal
balances through a loss share arrangement. At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the unpaid principal balance outstanding of loans sold as a participant in these programs was $13.2 billion and $13.0 billion, respectively. The potential
maximum exposure under the loss share arrangements was $4.0 billion at both March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. We maintain a reserve for estimated losses based upon our exposure. The reserve for losses under these programs totaled $50
million and $47 million as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, and is included in Other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. The comparable reserve as of March 31, 2011 was $56 million. If payment is
required under these programs, we would not have a contractual interest in the collateral underlying the mortgage loans on which losses occurred, although the value of the collateral is taken into account in determining our share of such losses. Our
exposure and activity associated with these recourse obligations are reported in the Corporate & Institutional Banking segment.
Analysis of Commercial Mortgage Recourse Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
January 1 |
|
$ |
47 |
|
|
$ |
54 |
|
Reserve adjustments, net |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
March 31 |
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
56 |
|
Residential Mortgage Loan and Home Equity Repurchase Obligations
While residential mortgage loans are sold on a non-recourse basis, we assume certain loan repurchase obligations associated with mortgage loans we have
sold to investors. These loan repurchase obligations primarily relate to situations where PNC is alleged to have breached certain origination covenants and representations and warranties made to purchasers of the loans in the respective purchase and
sale agreements. Residential mortgage loans covered by these loan repurchase obligations include first and second-lien mortgage loans we have sold through Agency securitizations, Non-Agency securitizations, and whole-loan sale transactions. As
discussed in Note 3 in our 2011 Form 10-K, Agency securitizations consist of mortgage loans sale transactions with FNMA, FHLMC, and GNMA, while Non-Agency securitizations and whole-loan sale transactions consist of mortgage loans sale transactions
with private investors. Our historical exposure and activity associated with Agency securitization repurchase obligations has primarily been related to transactions with FNMA and FHLMC, as indemnification and repurchase losses associated with FHA
and VA-insured and uninsured loans pooled in GNMA securitizations historically have been minimal. Repurchase obligation activity associated with residential mortgages is reported in the Residential Mortgage Banking segment.
PNCs repurchase obligations also include certain brokered home equity loans/lines that were sold to a
limited number of private investors in the financial services industry by National City prior to our acquisition. PNC is no longer engaged in the brokered home equity lending business, and our exposure under these loan repurchase obligations is
limited to repurchases of whole-loans sold in these transactions. Repurchase activity associated with brokered home equity loans/lines is reported in the Non-Strategic Assets Portfolio segment.
Loan covenants and representations and warranties are established through loan sale agreements with various investors to provide assurance that PNC has
sold loans to investors of sufficient investment quality. Key aspects of such covenants and representations and warranties include the loans compliance with any applicable loan criteria established by the investor, including underwriting
standards, delivery of all required loan documents to the investor or its designated party, sufficient collateral valuation, and the validity of the lien securing the loan. As a result of alleged breaches of these contractual obligations, investors
may request PNC to indemnify them against losses on certain loans or to repurchase loans.
These investor indemnification or repurchase claims
are typically settled on an individual loan basis through make-whole payments or loan repurchases; however, on occasion we may negotiate pooled settlements with investors.
Indemnifications for loss or loan repurchases typically occur when, after review of the claim, we agree insufficient evidence exists to dispute the investors claim that a breach of a loan covenant
and representation and warranty has occurred, such breach has not been cured, and the effect of such breach is deemed to have had a material and adverse effect on the value of the transferred loan. Depending on the sale agreement and upon proper
notice from the investor, we typically respond to such indemnification and repurchase requests within 60 days, although final resolution of the claim may take a longer period of time. With the exception of the sales agreements associated with the
Agency securitizations, most sale agreements do not provide for penalties or other remedies if we do not respond timely to investor indemnification or repurchase requests.
Origination and sale of residential mortgages is an ongoing business activity and, accordingly, management continually assesses the need to recognize indemnification and repurchase liabilities pursuant to
the associated investor sale agreements. We establish indemnification and repurchase liabilities for estimated losses on sold first and second-lien mortgages and home equity loans/lines for which indemnification is expected to be provided or for
loans that are expected to be repurchased. For the first and second-lien mortgage sold portfolio, we have established an indemnification and repurchase liability pursuant to investor sale agreements based
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 135
on claims made and our estimate of future claims on a loan by loan basis. These relate primarily to loans originated during 2006-2008. For the home equity loans/lines sold portfolio, we have
established indemnification and repurchase liabilities based upon this same methodology for loans sold during 2005-2007.
Indemnification and
repurchase liabilities are initially recognized when loans are sold to investors and are subsequently evaluated by management. Initial recognition
and subsequent adjustments to the indemnification and repurchase liability for the sold residential mortgage portfolio are recognized in Residential mortgage revenue on the Consolidated Income
Statement. Since PNC is no longer engaged in the brokered home equity lending business, only subsequent adjustments are recognized to the home equity loans/lines indemnification and repurchase liability. These adjustments are recognized in Other
noninterest income on the Consolidated Income Statement.
Managements subsequent
evaluation of these indemnification and repurchase liabilities is based upon trends in indemnification and repurchase requests, actual loss experience, risks in the underlying serviced loan portfolios, and current economic conditions. As part of its
evaluation, management considers estimated loss projections over the life of the subject loan portfolio. At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the total indemnification and repurchase liability for estimated losses on indemnification
and repurchase claims totaled $152 million and $130 million, respectively, and was included in Other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The balance at March 31, 2012 includes $26 million from the RBC Bank (USA) acquisition for
repurchase obligations related to RBC Bank (USA) sold loans. The comparable reserve as of March 31, 2011 was $252 million. An analysis of the changes in this liability during the first three months of 2012 and 2011 follows:
Analysis of Indemnification and Repurchase Liability for Asserted Claims and Unasserted Claims
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
In millions |
|
Residential Mortgages (a) |
|
|
Home Equity Loans/ Lines (b) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Residential Mortgages (a) |
|
|
Home Equity Loans/ Lines (b) |
|
|
Total |
|
January 1 |
|
$ |
83 |
|
|
$ |
47 |
|
|
$ |
130 |
|
|
$ |
144 |
|
|
$ |
150 |
|
|
$ |
294 |
|
Reserve adjustments, net |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
RBC Bank (USA) acquisition |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses loan repurchases and settlements |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(56 |
) |
March 31 |
|
$ |
101 |
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
152 |
|
|
$ |
124 |
|
|
$ |
128 |
|
|
$ |
252 |
|
(a) |
Repurchase obligation associated with sold loan portfolios of $126.0 billion and $134.2 billion at March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011, respectively.
|
(b) |
Repurchase obligation associated with sold loan portfolios of $4.4 billion and $6.3 billion at March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011, respectively. PNC is no
longer engaged in the brokered home equity business, which was acquired with National City. |
Management believes our indemnification and repurchase liabilities appropriately reflect the estimated
probable losses on investor indemnification and repurchase claims at March 31, 2012 and 2011. While management seeks to obtain all relevant information in estimating the indemnification and repurchase liability, the estimation process is
inherently uncertain and imprecise and, accordingly, it is reasonably possible that future indemnification and repurchase losses could be more or less than our established liability. Factors that could affect our estimate include the volume of valid
claims driven by investor strategies and behavior, our ability to successfully negotiate claims with investors, housing prices, and other economic conditions. At March 31, 2012, we estimate that it is reasonably possible that we could incur
additional losses in excess of our indemnification and repurchase liability of up to $104 million. This estimate of
potential additional losses in excess of our liability is based on assumed higher investor demands, lower claim rescissions, and lower home prices than our current assumptions.
REINSURANCE AGREEMENTS
We have two wholly-owned captive insurance subsidiaries which provide reinsurance to third-party insurers related to insurance sold to our customers. These subsidiaries enter into various types of
reinsurance agreements with third-party insurers where the subsidiary assumes the risk of loss through either an excess of loss or quota share agreement up to 100% reinsurance. In excess of loss agreements, these subsidiaries assume the risk of loss
for an excess layer of coverage up to specified limits, once a defined first loss percentage is met. In quota share agreements, the subsidiaries and third-party insurers share the responsibility for payment of all claims.
136 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
These subsidiaries provide reinsurance for accidental death & dismemberment, credit life,
accident & health, lender placed hazard, and borrower and lender paid mortgage insurance with an aggregate maximum exposure up to the specified limits for all reinsurance contracts as follows:
REINSURANCE AGREEMENTS EXPOSURE
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
March 31, 2012 |
|
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
Accidental Death & Dismemberment |
|
$ |
2,183 |
|
|
$ |
2,255 |
|
Credit Life, Accident & Health |
|
|
932 |
|
|
|
951 |
|
Lender Placed Hazard (b) |
|
|
2,768 |
|
|
|
2,899 |
|
Borrower and Lender Paid Mortgage Insurance |
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
Maximum Exposure |
|
$ |
6,177 |
|
|
$ |
6,432 |
|
|
|
|
Percentage of reinsurance agreements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess of Loss - Mortgage Insurance |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
Quota Share |
|
|
96 |
% |
|
|
96 |
% |
Maximum Exposure to Quota Share Agreements with 100% Reinsurance |
|
$ |
931 |
|
|
$ |
950 |
|
(a) |
Reinsurance agreements exposure balances represent estimates based on availability of financial information from insurance carriers. |
(b) |
Through the purchase of catastrophe reinsurance connected to the Lender Placed Hazard Exposure, should a catastrophic event occur PNC will benefit from this
reinsurance. No credit for the catastrophe reinsurance protection is applied to the aggregate exposure figure. |
A rollforward of
the reinsurance reserves for probable losses for the first three months of 2012 and 2011 follows:
REINSURANCE
RESERVES ROLLFORWARD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
January 1 |
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
$ |
150 |
|
Paid Losses |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
Net Provision |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
March 31 |
|
$ |
76 |
|
|
$ |
119 |
|
Changes to agreements only represent entering into a new relationship or exiting an existing agreement entirely. The
impact of changing the terms of existing agreements is reflected in the net provision.
There is a reasonable possibility that losses could be
more than or less than the amount reserved due to on-going uncertainty in various economic, social and other factors that could impact the frequency and severity of claims covered by these reinsurance agreements. At March 31, 2012, the
reasonably possible loss above our accrual was not material.
REPURCHASE AND RESALE
AGREEMENTS
We enter into repurchase and resale agreements where we transfer investment securities to/from a third party
with the agreement to repurchase/resell those investment securities at a future date for a specified price. These transactions are accounted for as collateralized borrowings/financings.
NOTE 18 SEGMENT REPORTING
We have six reportable business segments:
|
|
|
Corporate & Institutional Banking |
|
|
|
Residential Mortgage Banking |
|
|
|
Non-Strategic Assets Portfolio |
Results of individual businesses are presented based on our management accounting practices and management structure. There is no comprehensive, authoritative body of guidance for management accounting
equivalent to GAAP; therefore, the financial results of our individual businesses are not necessarily comparable with similar information for any other company. We refine our methodologies from time to time as our management accounting practices are
enhanced and our businesses and management structure change.
Financial results are presented, to the extent practicable, as if each business
operated on a stand-alone basis. Additionally, we have aggregated the results for corporate support functions within Other for financial reporting purposes.
Assets receive a funding charge and liabilities and capital receive a funding credit based on a transfer pricing methodology that incorporates product maturities, duration and other factors.
A portion of capital is intended to cover unexpected losses and is assigned to our business segments using our risk-based economic capital model,
including consideration of the goodwill and other intangible assets at those business segments, as well as the diversification of risk among the business segments.
We have allocated the allowances for loan and lease losses and for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit based on our assessment of risk in each business segments loan portfolio. Our
allocation of the costs incurred by operations and other shared support areas not directly aligned with the businesses is primarily based on the use of services.
Total business segment financial results differ from total consolidated net income. The impact of these differences is reflected in the Other category in the business segment tables.
Other includes residual activities that do not meet the criteria for disclosure as a separate reportable business, such as gains or losses related to BlackRock transactions, integration costs, asset and liability management activities
including net securities gains or losses, other-than-temporary impairment of investment securities and certain trading activities, exited businesses, alternative investments, including private equity, intercompany eliminations, most corporate
overhead, tax adjustments that are not allocated to business segments, and differences between business segment
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 137
performance reporting and financial statement reporting (GAAP), including the presentation of net income attributable to noncontrolling interests as the segments results exclude their
portion of net income attributable to noncontrolling interests. Assets, revenue and earnings attributable to foreign activities were not material in the periods presented for comparative purposes.
BUSINESS SEGMENT PRODUCTS AND SERVICES
Retail Banking provides deposit, lending, brokerage, investment management, and cash management services to consumer and small business
customers within our primary geographic markets. Our customers are serviced through our branch network, call centers and online banking channels. The branch network is located primarily in Pennsylvania, Ohio, New Jersey, Michigan, Illinois,
Maryland, Indiana, North Carolina, Florida, Kentucky, Washington, D.C., Alabama, Delaware, Georgia, Virginia, Missouri, Wisconsin, and South Carolina.
Corporate & Institutional Banking provides lending, treasury management, and capital markets-related products and services to mid-sized corporations, government and not-for-profit
entities, and selectively to large corporations. Lending products include secured and unsecured loans, letters of credit and equipment leases. Treasury management services include cash and investment management, receivables management, disbursement
services, funds transfer services, information reporting, and global trade services. Capital markets-related products and services include foreign exchange, derivatives, loan syndications, mergers and acquisitions advisory and related services to
middle-market companies, our multi-seller conduit, securities underwriting, and securities sales and trading. Corporate & Institutional Banking also provides commercial loan servicing, and real estate advisory and technology solutions for
the commercial real estate finance industry. Corporate & Institutional Banking provides products and services generally within our primary geographic markets, with certain products and services offered nationally and internationally.
Asset Management Group includes personal wealth management for high net worth and ultra high net worth clients and
institutional asset management. Wealth management products and services include financial and retirement planning, customized investment management, private banking, tailored credit solutions and trust management and administration for individuals
and their families. Institutional asset management provides investment management, custody, and retirement planning services. The institutional clients include corporations, unions,
municipalities, non-profits, foundations and endowments located primarily in our geographic footprint.
Residential Mortgage Banking directly originates primarily first lien residential mortgage loans on a nationwide basis with a significant presence within the retail banking footprint, and
also originates loans through majority owned affiliates. Mortgage loans represent loans collateralized by one-to-four-family residential real estate. These loans are typically underwritten to government agency and/or third-party standards, and sold,
servicing retained, to secondary mortgage conduits FNMA, FHLMC, Federal Home Loan Banks and third-party investors, or are securitized and issued under the GNMA program. The mortgage servicing operation performs all functions related to servicing
mortgage loans primarily those in first lien position for various investors and for loans owned by PNC. Certain loans originated through majority owned affiliates are sold to others.
BlackRock is a leader in investment management, risk management and advisory services for institutional and retail
clients worldwide. BlackRock provides diversified investment management services to institutional clients, intermediary and individual investors through various investment vehicles. Investment management services primarily consist of the management
of equity, fixed income, multi-asset class, alternative investment and cash management products. BlackRock offers its investment products in a variety of vehicles, including open-end and closed-end mutual funds, iShares® exchange-traded funds (ETFs), collective investment trusts and separate accounts. In addition, BlackRock
provides market risk management, financial markets advisory and enterprise investment system services to a broad base of clients. Financial markets advisory services include valuation services relating to illiquid securities, dispositions and
workout assignments (including long-term portfolio liquidation assignments), risk management and strategic planning and execution. At March 31, 2012, our economic interest in BlackRock was 21%.
PNC received cash dividends from BlackRock of $56 million during the first three months of 2012 and $53 million during the first three months of 2011.
Non-Strategic Assets Portfolio (formerly, Distressed Assets Portfolio) includes commercial residential development loans,
cross-border leases, consumer brokered home equity loans, retail mortgages, non-prime mortgages, and residential construction loans. We obtained the majority of these non-strategic assets through acquisitions of other companies, and most of these
assets fall outside of our core business strategy.
138 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
Results Of Businesses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
March 31 In millions |
|
Retail Banking |
|
|
Corporate & Institutional Banking |
|
|
Asset Management Group |
|
|
Residential Mortgage Banking |
|
|
BlackRock |
|
|
Non-Strategic Assets Portfolio |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Statement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
894 |
|
|
$ |
874 |
|
|
$ |
63 |
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
217 |
|
|
$ |
192 |
|
|
$ |
2,291 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
$ |
116 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
1,441 |
|
Total revenue |
|
|
1,284 |
|
|
|
1,204 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
3,732 |
|
Provision for credit losses (benefit) |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
Other noninterest expense |
|
|
1,024 |
|
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
2,288 |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling interests |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
722 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
1,092 |
|
Income taxes (benefit) |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
281 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
470 |
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
811 |
|
Inter-segment revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Average Assets (a) |
|
$ |
69,709 |
|
|
$ |
92,896 |
|
|
$ |
6,566 |
|
|
$ |
11,989 |
|
|
$ |
5,565 |
|
|
$ |
12,124 |
|
|
$ |
82,693 |
|
|
$ |
281,542 |
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Statement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
818 |
|
|
$ |
782 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
236 |
|
|
$ |
224 |
|
|
$ |
2,176 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
$ |
108 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
1,455 |
|
Total revenue |
|
|
1,247 |
|
|
|
1,081 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
3,631 |
|
Provision for credit losses (benefit) |
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
421 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
Other noninterest expense |
|
|
954 |
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
1,898 |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
1,140 |
|
Income taxes (benefit) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
308 |
|
Net Income (loss) |
|
$ |
(18 |
) |
|
$ |
432 |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
$ |
86 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
193 |
|
|
$ |
832 |
|
Inter-segment revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Average Assets (a) |
|
$ |
66,670 |
|
|
$ |
76,980 |
|
|
$ |
6,917 |
|
|
$ |
11,619 |
|
|
$ |
5,530 |
|
|
$ |
14,121 |
|
|
$ |
80,717 |
|
|
$ |
262,554 |
|
(a) |
Period-end balances for BlackRock. |
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 139
NOTE 19 SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On April 10, 2012, we announced that May 25, 2012 will be the redemption date of $500 million of trust preferred securities
issued by National City Capital Trust III with a current distribution rate of 6.625% and an original scheduled maturity date of May 25, 2047 and submitted a redemption notice to the trustee. The redemption price will be $25 per trust preferred
security plus any accrued and unpaid distributions to the redemption date of May 25, 2012. In addition, on April 25, 2012 we redeemed $300 million of trust preferred securities issued by PNC Capital Trust D with a distribution rate of
6.125% and $6 million of trust preferred securities issued by Yardville Capital Trust III with a distribution rate of 10.18%. These redemptions together will result in a noncash charge for the unamortized discounts of approximately $130 million in
the second quarter of 2012.
On April 24, 2012, we issued 60 million depositary shares, each representing a 1/4,000th interest
in a share of our Fixed-to-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series P, in an underwritten public offering resulting in gross proceeds of $1.5 billion to us before commissions and expenses. We granted the underwriters an option
to purchase up to an additional 3 million depositary shares within 30 days after April 19, 2012 at the public offering price, less underwriting discounts and commissions, to cover overallotments, if any. We intend to use the net proceeds
from the sale of the depositary shares for general corporate purposes, which may include repurchases and redemptions of issued and outstanding securities of PNC and its subsidiaries, including trust preferred securities.
140 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
STATISTICAL INFORMATION
(UNAUDITED)
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
Average Consolidated Balance Sheet And Net Interest Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter 2012 |
|
|
Fourth Quarter 2011 |
|
Taxable-equivalent basis
Dollars in millions |
|
Average Balances |
|
|
Interest Income/ Expense |
|
|
Average Yields/ Rates |
|
|
Average Balances |
|
|
Interest Income/ Expense |
|
|
Average Yields/ Rates |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency |
|
$ |
27,031 |
|
|
$ |
212 |
|
|
|
3.14 |
% |
|
$ |
25,691 |
|
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
|
3.11 |
% |
Non-agency |
|
|
6,577 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
5.38 |
|
|
|
6,859 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
5.44 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed |
|
|
3,774 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
4.42 |
|
|
|
3,640 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
4.43 |
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
4,329 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
2.24 |
|
|
|
3,832 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
2.39 |
|
US Treasury and government agencies |
|
|
3,123 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
1.80 |
|
|
|
3,376 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
2.61 |
|
State and municipal |
|
|
1,770 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
5.13 |
|
|
|
1,767 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
4.58 |
|
Other debt |
|
|
2,996 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
2.55 |
|
|
|
2,731 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
2.75 |
|
Corporate stocks and other |
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.03 |
|
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.04 |
|
Total securities available for sale |
|
|
49,947 |
|
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
3.38 |
|
|
|
48,342 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
3.46 |
|
Securities held to maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed |
|
|
4,576 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
3.58 |
|
|
|
4,658 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
3.39 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed |
|
|
4,635 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
4.62 |
|
|
|
4,794 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
4.57 |
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
1,170 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1.68 |
|
|
|
1,353 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1.98 |
|
State and municipal |
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
4.18 |
|
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
4.19 |
|
Other |
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3.19 |
|
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3.23 |
|
Total securities held to maturity |
|
|
11,636 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
3.82 |
|
|
|
12,059 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
3.74 |
|
Total investment securities |
|
|
61,583 |
|
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
3.47 |
|
|
|
60,401 |
|
|
|
531 |
|
|
|
3.51 |
|
Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
69,286 |
|
|
|
789 |
|
|
|
4.51 |
|
|
|
63,483 |
|
|
|
755 |
|
|
|
4.66 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
16,818 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
5.19 |
|
|
|
16,413 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
5.33 |
|
Equipment lease financing |
|
|
6,377 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
4.74 |
|
|
|
6,233 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
4.84 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
57,148 |
|
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
4.78 |
|
|
|
55,556 |
|
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
4.81 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
14,927 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
5.59 |
|
|
|
14,474 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
5.35 |
|
Total loans |
|
|
164,556 |
|
|
|
1,973 |
|
|
|
4.78 |
|
|
|
156,159 |
|
|
|
1,922 |
|
|
|
4.85 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
2,910 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
6.89 |
|
|
|
2,673 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
5.96 |
|
Federal funds sold and resale agreements |
|
|
1,821 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1.58 |
|
|
|
2,035 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1.48 |
|
Other |
|
|
6,864 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
3.71 |
|
|
|
7,138 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
3.45 |
|
Total interest-earning assets/interest income |
|
|
237,734 |
|
|
|
2,628 |
|
|
|
4.41 |
|
|
|
228,406 |
|
|
|
2,562 |
|
|
|
4.44 |
|
Noninterest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
|
(4,314 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,472 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
3,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
44,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
281,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
270,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market |
|
$ |
61,162 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
.23 |
|
|
$ |
58,897 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
.25 |
|
Demand |
|
|
31,599 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
.04 |
|
|
|
29,338 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
.05 |
|
Savings |
|
|
9,183 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
.10 |
|
|
|
8,545 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
.16 |
|
Retail certificates of deposit |
|
|
29,011 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
.80 |
|
|
|
30,888 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
1.16 |
|
Time deposits in foreign offices and other time |
|
|
3,238 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
.49 |
|
|
|
2,869 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
.53 |
|
Total interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
134,193 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
.31 |
|
|
|
130,537 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
.42 |
|
Borrowed funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements |
|
|
4,551 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
.22 |
|
|
|
3,714 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
.15 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings |
|
|
8,967 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
.80 |
|
|
|
6,090 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
.93 |
|
Bank notes and senior debt |
|
|
11,138 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
2.48 |
|
|
|
11,463 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
2.11 |
|
Subordinated debt |
|
|
7,719 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
5.09 |
|
|
|
8,463 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
4.91 |
|
Other |
|
|
7,837 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
.75 |
|
|
|
5,935 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
.93 |
|
Total borrowed funds |
|
|
40,212 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
2.01 |
|
|
|
35,665 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
2.17 |
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities/interest expense |
|
|
174,405 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
.70 |
|
|
|
166,202 |
|
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
.80 |
|
Noninterest-bearing liabilities and equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
|
57,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit |
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
11,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
37,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
281,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
270,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.64 |
|
Impact of noninterest-bearing sources |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.22 |
|
Net interest income/margin |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,322 |
|
|
|
3.90 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,227 |
|
|
|
3.86 |
% |
Nonaccrual loans are included in loans, net of unearned income. The impact of financial derivatives used in interest rate
risk management is included in the interest income/expense and average yields/rates of the related assets and liabilities. Basis adjustments related to hedged items are included in noninterest-earning assets and noninterest-bearing liabilities.
Average balances of securities are based on amortized historical cost (excluding adjustments to fair value, which are included in other assets). Average balances for certain loans and borrowed funds accounted for at fair value, with changes in fair
value recorded in trading noninterest income, are included in noninterest-earning assets and noninterest-bearing liabilities. The interest-earning deposits with the Federal Reserve are included in the Other interest-earning assets
category.
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter 2011 |
|
|
Second Quarter 2011 |
|
|
First Quarter 2011 |
|
Average
Balances |
|
|
Interest
Income/
Expense |
|
|
Average
Yields/
Rates |
|
|
Average
Balances |
|
|
Interest
Income/
Expense |
|
|
Average
Yields/
Rates |
|
|
Average
Balances |
|
|
Interest
Income/
Expense |
|
|
Average
Yields/
Rates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$22,822 |
|
|
$ |
190 |
|
|
|
3.34 |
% |
|
$ |
25,993 |
|
|
$ |
241 |
|
|
|
3.70 |
% |
|
$ |
29,134 |
|
|
$ |
263 |
|
|
|
3.61 |
% |
|
7,135 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
5.13 |
|
|
|
7,618 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
5.47 |
|
|
|
8,057 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
5.23 |
|
|
3,623 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
4.41 |
|
|
|
3,278 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
4.73 |
|
|
|
3,298 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
4.74 |
|
|
3,817 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
2.38 |
|
|
|
3,185 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
2.43 |
|
|
|
2,757 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
2.70 |
|
|
3,699 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
3.01 |
|
|
|
4,505 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
2.46 |
|
|
|
5,682 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
2.51 |
|
|
1,929 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
4.27 |
|
|
|
2,234 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
4.37 |
|
|
|
2,081 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
4.95 |
|
|
3,113 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
2.42 |
|
|
|
3,578 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
2.58 |
|
|
|
3,994 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
2.58 |
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.04 |
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.04 |
|
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.06 |
|
|
46,587 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
3.54 |
|
|
|
50,767 |
|
|
|
478 |
|
|
|
3.77 |
|
|
|
55,446 |
|
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
3.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,840 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
3.45 |
|
|
|
1,130 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
3.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,520 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
4.95 |
|
|
|
4,215 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
5.11 |
|
|
|
4,239 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
5.22 |
|
|
1,863 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
1.87 |
|
|
|
2,276 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
2.20 |
|
|
|
2,463 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
2.53 |
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4.48 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.10 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.10 |
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3.20 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2.95 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.80 |
|
|
11,101 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
3.82 |
|
|
|
7,779 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
4.01 |
|
|
|
6,711 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
4.24 |
|
|
57,688 |
|
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
3.59 |
|
|
|
58,546 |
|
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
3.80 |
|
|
|
62,157 |
|
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
3.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,951 |
|
|
|
744 |
|
|
|
4.86 |
|
|
|
57,932 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
4.88 |
|
|
|
56,300 |
|
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
5.04 |
|
|
16,347 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
5.25 |
|
|
|
16,779 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
5.51 |
|
|
|
17,545 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
4.63 |
|
|
6,150 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
5.11 |
|
|
|
6,189 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
4.86 |
|
|
|
6,307 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
|
|
54,632 |
|
|
|
664 |
|
|
|
4.82 |
|
|
|
54,014 |
|
|
|
665 |
|
|
|
4.94 |
|
|
|
54,460 |
|
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
4.99 |
|
|
14,717 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
5.90 |
|
|
|
15,001 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
6.22 |
|
|
|
15,518 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
6.15 |
|
|
151,797 |
|
|
|
1,923 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
|
|
|
149,915 |
|
|
|
1,922 |
|
|
|
5.11 |
|
|
|
150,130 |
|
|
|
1,901 |
|
|
|
5.09 |
|
|
2,497 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
7.31 |
|
|
|
2,719 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
5.62 |
|
|
|
3,193 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
8.77 |
|
|
2,030 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1.55 |
|
|
|
2,321 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
1.39 |
|
|
|
2,813 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1.19 |
|
|
10,060 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
2.43 |
|
|
|
7,241 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
2.60 |
|
|
|
5,802 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
3.06 |
|
|
224,072 |
|
|
|
2,557 |
|
|
|
4.52 |
|
|
|
220,742 |
|
|
|
2,572 |
|
|
|
4.64 |
|
|
|
224,095 |
|
|
|
2,607 |
|
|
|
4.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,592 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,728 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,835 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$266,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
261,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
262,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$59,009 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
.31 |
|
|
$ |
58,594 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
.34 |
|
|
$ |
58,556 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
.35 |
|
|
27,654 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
.08 |
|
|
|
26,912 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
.10 |
|
|
|
26,313 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
.10 |
|
|
8,305 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
.19 |
|
|
|
8,222 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
.19 |
|
|
|
7,656 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
.19 |
|
|
33,607 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
1.26 |
|
|
|
35,098 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
1.32 |
|
|
|
36,509 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
1.28 |
|
|
2,191 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
.72 |
|
|
|
2,250 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
.75 |
|
|
|
3,967 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
.54 |
|
|
130,766 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
.51 |
|
|
|
131,076 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
.55 |
|
|
|
133,001 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,685 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
.15 |
|
|
|
4,138 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
.17 |
|
|
|
6,376 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
.16 |
|
|
5,015 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
.99 |
|
|
|
5,021 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
1.02 |
|
|
|
5,088 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
1.02 |
|
|
10,480 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
2.01 |
|
|
|
11,132 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
2.40 |
|
|
|
11,745 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
2.31 |
|
|
8,982 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
4.76 |
|
|
|
8,981 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
5.24 |
|
|
|
9,353 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
5.46 |
|
|
5,736 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
.92 |
|
|
|
5,713 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
1.12 |
|
|
|
5,847 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
.98 |
|
|
33,898 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
2.20 |
|
|
|
34,985 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
2.46 |
|
|
|
38,409 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
2.35 |
|
|
164,664 |
|
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
.86 |
|
|
|
166,061 |
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
.95 |
|
|
|
171,410 |
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$266,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
261,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
262,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,202 |
|
|
|
3.89 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,175 |
|
|
|
3.93 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,200 |
|
|
|
3.94 |
% |
Loan fees for the three months ended March 31, 2012, December 31, 2011, September 30,
2011, June 30, 2011, and March 31, 2011 were $49 million, $46 million, $44 million, $47 million, and $38 million, respectively.
Interest income includes the effects of taxable-equivalent adjustments using a marginal federal income tax rate of 35% to increase tax-exempt interest
income to a taxable-equivalent basis. The taxable-equivalent adjustments to interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2012, December 31, 2011, September 30, 2011, June 30, 2011, and March 31, 2011
were $31 million, $28 million, $27 million, $25 million, and $24 million, respectively.
142 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
See the information set forth in Note 16 Legal Proceedings in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements under Part I, Item 1
of this Report, which is incorporated by reference in response to this item.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
There are no material changes from any of the risk factors previously disclosed in PNCs 2011 Form 10-K as amended by Amendment
No. 1 on Form 10-K/A in response to Part I, Item 1A.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF
EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
(c) Details of our repurchases of PNC common stock during the first quarter of 2012 are included in the following table:
In thousands, except per share data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012 period |
|
Total shares purchased (a) |
|
|
Average price paid per share |
|
|
Total shares purchased as part
of publicly announced programs (b) |
|
Maximum number of
shares that may yet be purchased under the programs (b) |
|
January 1 31 |
|
|
276 |
|
|
$ |
59.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
24,710 |
|
February 1 29 |
|
|
151 |
|
|
$ |
59.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
24,710 |
|
March 1 31 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
$ |
63.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
24,710 |
|
Total |
|
|
431 |
|
|
$ |
59.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Reflects PNC common stock purchased in connection with our various employee benefit plans. No shares were purchased under the program referred to in note (b) to
this table during the first quarter of 2012. Effective January 2011, employer matching contributions to the PNC Incentive Savings Plan were no longer made in PNC common stock, but rather in cash. Note 14 Employee Benefit Plans and Note 15 Stock
Based Compensation Plans in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K as amended by Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (2011 Form 10-K) include additional information regarding our employee
benefit plans that use PNC common stock. |
(b) |
Our current stock repurchase program allows us to purchase up to 25 million shares on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. This program was
authorized on October 4, 2007 and will remain in effect until fully utilized or until modified, superseded or terminated. The extent and timing of share repurchases under this program will depend on a number of factors including, among others,
market and general economic conditions, economic capital and regulatory capital considerations, alternative uses of capital, the potential impact on our credit ratings, and contractual and regulatory limitations, including the impact of the Federal
Reserves supervisory assessment of capital adequacy program. |
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 143
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
The following exhibit index lists Exhibits filed, or in the case of Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 furnished, with this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q:
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
3.4 and 4.23 |
|
Statement with respect to Shares of Fixed-to-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series P dated April 19, 2012. |
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 of PNCs Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 24, 2012. |
|
|
10.77 |
|
2012 forms of employee stock option, restricted stock and restricted share unit agreements |
|
|
10.78 |
|
Forms of employee stock option, restricted stock and restricted share unit agreements with varied vesting, payment and other circumstances |
|
|
12.1 |
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
|
|
12.2 |
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends |
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
|
|
101 |
|
Interactive Data File (XBRL) |
You can obtain copies of these Exhibits electronically at the SECs website at www.sec.gov or by mail from the
Public Reference Section of the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549 at prescribed rates. The Exhibits are also available as part of this Form 10-Q on PNCs corporate website at www.pnc.com/secfilings. Shareholders and bondholders
may also obtain copies of Exhibits, without charge, by contacting Shareholder Relations at 800-843-2206 or via e-mail at investor.relations@pnc.com. The interactive data file (XBRL) exhibit is only available electronically.
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on May 9, 2012 on its behalf
by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
|
/s/ Richard J. Johnson |
Richard J. Johnson |
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
(Principal Financial Officer) |
144 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q
CORPORATE INFORMATION
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
One PNC Plaza, 249 Fifth Avenue
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222-2707
412-762-2000
STOCK
LISTING The common stock of The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol PNC.
INTERNET INFORMATION The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.s financial reports and information about its products and services are
available on the internet at www.pnc.com. We provide information for investors on our corporate website under About PNC Investor Relations, such as Investor Events, Quarterly Earnings, SEC Filings, Financial Information, Financial
Press Releases and Message from the Chairman. Under Investor Relations, we will from time to time post information that we believe may be important or useful to investors. We generally post the following shortly before or promptly
following its first use or release: financially-related press releases (including earnings releases), various SEC filings, presentation materials associated with earnings and other investor conference calls or events, and access to live and taped
audio from such calls or events. When warranted, we will also use our website to expedite public access to time-critical information regarding PNC in advance of distribution of a press release or a filing with the SEC disclosing the same
information. You can also find the SEC reports and corporate governance information described in the sections below in the Investor Relations section of our website.
Where we have included web addresses in this Report, such as our web address and the web address of the SEC, we have included those web addresses as inactive textual references only. Except as
specifically incorporated by reference into this Report, information on those websites is not part hereof.
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION We are subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), and, in accordance with the Exchange Act, we file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy
statements, and other information with the SEC. Our SEC File Number is 001-09718. You can obtain copies of these and other filings, including exhibits, electronically at the SECs internet website at www.sec.gov or on PNCs corporate
internet website at www.pnc.com/secfilings. Shareholders and bond holders may also obtain copies of these filings without charge by contacting Shareholder Services at 800-982-7652 or via the online contact form at www.computershare.com/contactus for
copies without exhibits, and by contacting Shareholder Relations at 800-843-2206 or via email at
investor.relations@pnc.com for copies of exhibits, including financial statement and schedule exhibits where applicable. The interactive data file (XBRL) exhibit is only available electronically.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AT PNC Information about our Board of Directors and its
committees and corporate governance at PNC is available on PNCs corporate website at www.pnc.com/corporategovernance. Shareholders who would like to request printed copies of PNCs Code of Business Conduct and Ethics or our Corporate
Governance Guidelines or the charters of our Boards Audit, Nominating and Governance, Personnel and Compensation, or Risk Committees (all of which are posted on the PNC corporate website) may do so by sending their requests to George P. Long,
III, Chief Governance Counsel and Corporate Secretary, at corporate headquarters at the above address. Copies will be provided without charge to shareholders.
INQUIRIES For financial services call 888-PNC-2265.
Individual
shareholders should contact Shareholder Services at 800-982-7652.
Analysts and institutional investors should contact William H. Callihan,
Senior Vice President, Director of Investor Relations, at 412-762-8257 or via email at investor.relations@pnc.com.
News media representatives
and others seeking general information should contact Fred Solomon, Vice President, Corporate Communications, at 412-762-4550 or via email at corporate.communications@pnc.com.
COMMON STOCK PRICES/DIVIDENDS DECLARED The table below sets forth by quarter the range of high and low sale and
quarter-end closing prices for The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. common stock and the cash dividends declared per common share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
|
Close |
|
|
Cash Dividends Declared (a) |
|
2012 Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
|
$ |
64.79 |
|
|
$ |
56.88 |
|
|
$ |
64.49 |
|
|
$ |
.35 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
.35 |
|
2011 Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
|
$ |
65.19 |
|
|
$ |
59.67 |
|
|
$ |
62.99 |
|
|
$ |
.10 |
|
Second |
|
|
64.37 |
|
|
|
55.56 |
|
|
|
59.61 |
|
|
|
.35 |
|
Third |
|
|
61.21 |
|
|
|
42.70 |
|
|
|
48.19 |
|
|
|
.35 |
|
Fourth |
|
|
58.70 |
|
|
|
44.74 |
|
|
|
57.67 |
|
|
|
.35 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.15 |
|
(a) |
Our Board approved a second quarter 2012 cash dividend of $.40 per common share, which was payable on the next business day after the payment date of May 5, 2012.
|
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q 145
DIVIDEND POLICY Holders of PNC common stock are entitled to
receive dividends when declared by the Board of Directors out of funds legally available for this purpose. Our Board of Directors may not pay or set apart dividends on the common stock until dividends for all past dividend periods on any series of
outstanding preferred stock have been paid or declared and set apart for payment. The Board presently intends to continue the policy of paying quarterly cash dividends. The amount of any future dividends will depend on economic and market
conditions, our financial condition and operating results, and other factors, including contractual restrictions and applicable government regulations and policies (such as those relating to the ability of bank and non-bank subsidiaries to pay
dividends to the parent company and regulatory capital limitations).
DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT AND STOCK
PURCHASE PLAN
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan
enables holders of our common and preferred Series B stock to conveniently purchase additional shares of common stock. You can obtain a prospectus and enrollment form by contacting Shareholder Services at 800-982-7652.
REGISTRAR AND STOCK TRANSFER AGENT
Computershare Trust Company, N.A.
250 Royall
Street
Canton, MA 02021
800-982-7652
146 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Form 10-Q